Hello;
I have here my first Sinclair ZX81 Computer with 16K Ram extension.
To check if the Ram extension works properly i want to write an small
Basic program to check each byte.
The first thing i struggle on is that 1 could not type in a for next
statement.
10 FOR I = 17000 TO 32768
if I type in this line, the ZX81 mark an inverted "S" just before "TO".
10 FOR I = 17000 "S"TO 32768
I found out that the ZX81 "think" that there is an Sytax Error with the TO.
So i tryed all combinations with and without spaces in that basic line....
Nothing matters.
Is there someone who knows about that behaviour?
Marco
* Englisch - erkannt
* Englisch
* Deutsch
* Englisch
* Deutsch
<javascript:void(0);><#>
Hi,
I have a bunch of PCB's from a HP3000 series 52 computer. Is some one
interested in those?
The machine itself was still working when it was taken out of service in
the late 1990's. No guaranties are given though.
The location is in south of Sweden, but I'll guess I can pack them and
send them elsewhere.
There is also a power supply available. A disk station and some kind of a
tape drive, each sitting in a cabinet of their own. Free for pickup.
Don't know more than this, but I can find out more details if anyone is
interested.
/Anders
Hi,
I have an broken DEC PC05 puncher unit here.
It seems the shaft which transfers motor power to the excenter mechanism
is broken in the inside.
So i need to dissassemble the whole unit, but have no idea where to start.
I've read somewhere the mechanical puncher unit is not made by DEC but
by some other company.
Is there any known documentation about the DEC PC05 puncher ?
Thanks,
J?rg
On 15 June 2015 at 22:55, Mark J. Blair <nf6x at nf6x.net> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 15, 2015, at 13:46 , Pontus Pihlgren <pontus at Update.UU.SE> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:55:57PM +0000, tony duell wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately I believe you. Use at least a thousand times more components than
>>> you need to.
>>
>> Actually it's just two, a Teensy and a usb cable. (Sorry, I couldn't
>> resist).
>
> LOL! I must admit that I used to scorn those durned kids using Arduinos to do the job of a 555. But then I pulled my head out of my ass and realized that times change, nowadays a microcontroller is as cheap and common component as a 555 was[..]
I think I'm reasonably well into the pragmatic camp (ref. Chuck G.'s
post). But one point about 555s and Arduinos is that I couldn't build
a 555 more easily than I could build the MCU on an Arduino board (a
more relevant comparision might be a 555 vs a Propeller chip) -
they're all black boxes to me. Even a transistor, to some extent - I
know exactly how it works, well, as much as any other EE anyway, but I
couldn't build one. Or a vacuum tube..
Clearing out the phone collection as well
1 Western Electric 551B PBX Switchboard. Fully Functional with a 24V
Power Supply- Switch calls like a BOSS
1 Panasonic 616 PBX
1 Plexus by BBS Telecom PBX- Highly programmable with IVR
About 100 vintage telephones, all kinds, 500 sets, trimlines,
princesses, explosion proof, australian phones you name it its here.
3 totes of telecom cable, over 500ft of 25pair wire with 66 blocks
1000ft of aerial wire and outside network stuff.
1 Asterisk Server with TDM400p Card
About 10 Analog Telephone adapters.
You name it I have it.
Make an offer on it
I picked this up last year, sat in the closet ever since.. Its an HP
9836C, In perfect condition with Owners Manual, Some software, Long HP
IB Cable and some sort of weird network interface. The disk drives need
lubed to work.
Make an offer on it
Its a heavy beast, Id prefer not to ship it, but I can if need be.. I
live near Mount Pleasant Michigan, but could meet anywhere in Michigan
for the cost of gas.
Id like to see this go to someone who would appreciate it and use it.
Thanks
Steve
I had acquired an IBM 5120 a few months ago but I didn?t have time to really check it out.
It?s a fairly pristine example (32KB) with dual 8? floppies. It also came with a few manuals
including the Maintenance Information Manual as well as the Computing System Logic
Manual (still shrink wrapped). It also has a serial I/O diskette and a diagnostic diskette.
It also came with a printer but I have not yet unboxed that yet.
When I originally unboxed the 5120 I was a bit disappointed in that the shipper didn?t pack
it as well as I would have liked (styrofoam peanuts) but there was other packing material
so it wasn?t a complete disaster.
Since it was a working unit prior to shipment, after an initial inspection, I powered it up only
to have nothing happen. :-( I proceeded to take the covers off and noticed that the fuse
for the display had blown. It was likely vibration related since I didn?t see nor smell any
burnt components. Replacing the fuse, I saw that the cathode filament was lit but still nothing
on the display. :-(
After removing the logic chassis and removing all of the foam ?gunk?, I noticed that a couple
of the boards as well as the connectors for two of the boards were loose. After reseating
everything, success!
I haven?t yet done a complete checkout yet, but I did enter a small BASIC program and it
ran successfully. Now I have to find some IBM formatted 2D diskettes for this so that I can
save what ever programs I enter. ;-)
TTFN - Guy
> From: tony duell
> I find [RL0x's] easier than RK05s
Try taking out an RA81!
(Somewhere I have pictures of the rig I built to take a couple of RA81's out
of some racks I was sent. I should post them...)
Noel
Last week while bored and browsing eBay looking at things that are ending soon something I had never heard of caught my eye: an Altos ACS 8000-15A. I looked at the pictures and googled the brand and model and it didn?t seem to be a very common computer and there were no bids on the item so I put in a fairly low bid. I ended up winning! :-)
The seller asked if it would be ok to bring the item to me the next time he was in my area. I figured that was fine since I was concerned that since it has a large 8? hard drive in it that it would be more likely to be damaged in shipping. I actually didn?t even need to wait very long! Friday he set out to drive across 2 states and dropped off the computer at my front door on Saturday morning. Talk about excellent service!
I buy lots of untested items on eBay and usually they work just fine. But luck hasn?t held for me this time and so far the Altos doesn?t work. I can hear the drives spin up and all the voltages from the DC power supply are perfect. But nothing spits out on the Console 1 RS232 port. From what I understand the serial ports are wired DTE (which seems odd since you use it with terminals) and so I?m using a null modem adapter. Although with the null modem or without I get nothing.
Anyways, I posted an album with lots of pictures here:
http://imgur.com/a/9X8Gh
Yay another project for me to fix! :-)
--
Follow me on twitter: @FozzTexx
Check out my blog: http://insentricity.com
J. Victor Nahigian donated some M221 and M222 boards for the processor and
TC12 LINCtape controller. They are in pretty bad condition, but are
repairable. Warren wrote a test program for the M222 boards, and some of
the just donated boards actually work OK. It will be nice to have some
spares.
Dan (the donor) brought over the now lubricated top of cabinet fan. He had
to make some special tools to disassembled it but was able to lubricate the
dry bearings. We will reinstall it next week. He also dropped off the
system logbook and more diagnostic manuals. More scanning for Bitsavers! It
is really interesting to see the service history of this system since it
was new.
The LICM scanned some of the missing MAINDEC documentation so we were able
to run:
MAINDEC-12-D1AC-D Extended Memory Control (EXTMC12)
MAINDEC-12-D8CC-D_KW12A_Clock_Test Fails test #11 where the AC should be
0000 and is 7777 on the CLRB instruction.
MAINDEC-12-D8CA-D-(D) KW12 Real Time Clock Diagnostic (KW12TST) shows the
same failure mode as D8CC.
MAINDEC-12-D6BA VR12 Display Test Runs, but we have no display connected.
We connected the 'scope to the outputs of the VC12 display controller when
MAINDEC-12-D6BA was running. Without a way to interpret the intensify
signal, and no persistence in the phosphor, the resulting image was not too
good. At least we know that the display controller is responding to
commands and outputs signals that look reasonable.
We reran MAINDEC-12-D3AD-D-D Tape Control Test Part 1 of 2.
It still fails at 3400 with the error message "LGP GP=GPC PRESET" printed.
We reran MAINDEC-12-D3GA-D-D Tape Control Test part 2 of 2.
That runs fine.
I bought the matching terminator for my current probe and was able to give
it a try today. The normal setting for PDP-12, PDP-8/I, and PDP-8/L core is
320mA. When we debugged the core we set the voltage regulator to the middle
of the high and low voltage settings that caused periodic errors. The low
going part is the read current and the high going is the rewrite current.
The result turned out to be 316mV for the read. Not too bad!
--
Michael Thompson
I bought the two old Macs there this morning, but there's *years* of 80s
magazines still there: BYTE, nibbles, MacUser, Softalk, Creative Computing,
Personal Computing, Call-A.P.P.L.E, a few Macworld and PC Magazine issues,
probably some others I'm forgetting.
Only one more day for the sale, they'll probably let you haul them away for
(close to) nothing on Saturday.
Also there's a Toshiba T1000 and Apple II+ probably still there.
http://www.estatesales.net/CA/Huntington-Beach/92646/931308
Brendan
Following the recent discussion here on the 'DEC logo' topic, I've been mucking about with my own efforts to produce a replica PDP11 masthead panel for the DEC H960 rack.
The idea is basically to make an SVG for a vinyl stencil which looks 'good enough' until I can find an orignal one. I've drawn CAD (vectors and arcs only - no splines)
over images I've found on the web, from scratch, without relying on the Batchelder examples. So far the output is virtually complete but I need some help from the list,
if possible - I would like the dimensions of the width and height. I know it's larger than a DEC filler panel. With thise I can adjust the drawing to the final size and
continue on the project.
As I need to mix a blurb with example images I've placed it under a blog entry on the VCF board at
http://www.vintage-computer.com/vcforum/entry.php?544-A-good-enough-replica…
Please take a look, and thanks for any help or comments,
Steve.
Im just trying to clear out some excess stuff to make room for the SxS Telephone switch im getting. Everything listed
below just make an offer on. Ill more than likely accept it :) I just want this stuff to go to someone who will use it.
Plus i need space in my basement as an SxS Telephone switch is huge.
IBM AT Clone. 640KB RAM 40MB MFM Hard Drive. Ethernet Card, set up
with mTCP. 1.44 3.5 HD Drive and 5.25 HD Drive. Has ATI VGA/EGA Card as
well Make A Fair Offer
Toshiba Satellite 4010 CDS 32MB RAM 2GB HDD.. Has 3.5 drive, CD-ROM and
Ethernet Card. Make a Fair offer
Dell Dimension M233a. 32MB RAM 8GB HDD. Ethernet. This is running
OpenStep 4.2 with fully supported video, networking and sound. 233Mhz
Pentium MMX Processor. It runs it really nicely.
Hp Pavilion 6630 500mhz Celeron 64MB RAM 10GB HDD. Runs OpenStep 4.2 with Networking and video fully supported.
Dell Dimension XPS T450. Pentium 3 450mhz 128MB RAM 10GB HDD, ATI Rage 8MB Graphics, SB Awe32 Sound, 3C905
networking. And A USB Card.. All Fully Supported in OpenStep 4.2. This is a beast of an OpenStep 4.2 and with the
8mb graphics card, It does 1280x1024 at 32 bit color on any LCD you throw at it. It Looks great.
Microsoft Systems and Development CD-ROM Circa 1994
Windows For Workgroups 3.11 Disk Set
Windows NT For PowerPC, Intel, MIPS 6000, Alpha
MS-DOS 6.22 Disk Set
IBM Cartridge Basic for PCJr
Windows 95 Original Release on CD-ROM and Floppies with Book and Key Code
Thanks.
eBay feedback upon request and I accept PayPal. Or if you are in
Michigan and want to come pick it up you are more than welcome to
come. I am in Central Michigan, North of Mount Pleasant
Thanks
Steve
I think we've got a few active list members in Brasil, and somebody's
got a nicely configured SGI Indy available for collection in Sao Paolo.
> it has irix 6.2 installed (maybe) and (may still have) Maya and
> Photoshop 1 with licenses. and medias for irix only. two hdds inside.
> maxed ram. external cd rom. camera. 24 bit graphics card. (i may be
> able to find the 8bit card). all cables (scsi, monitor, ...)
>
> if anyone want it, must pick it up in sao paulo soon. [...] oh and
> everything is very, very clean.
Original post is at: http://forums.nekochan.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=16729781
Please check the original post for contact details - I have nothing to
do with this except for the re-posting.
Hope somebody manages to rescue the beast,
--S.
> From: Pete Turnbull
> z = about 0.5mm - you're trying to measure the taper on the edge of
> the flange? Not easy to be accurate.
Ah, I've just realized I made a mistake in a previous message.
I thought 'z' was calling for the distance between the inner edge of what I'm
calling 'the flange' (i.e. the edge the left-hand arrow of 'x' is pointing
to), and the upright at the right end of what I'll call the 'bottom plate'
(when the piece is mounted on the H960, the bottom plate is in a plane
parallel to the ground - i.e. it's in a plane perpendicular to what I'm
calling 'the flange'). That upright is the vertical (in this picture) axis at
one end of 'z'.
Having called up a flat plate, and a square, to help measure accurately, the
width of the flange ('x') is 1.26 cm, and the distance from the outer edge of
the flange to the vertical at one end of 'z' (i.e. the end of the 'bottom
plate') is 1.57 cm at the 'bottom' of the plate (i.e. in this image), making
the distance from the inner edge of the flange to the vertical edge of the
bottom plate 3.1 mm - at the 'bottom' of the bottom plate.
At the _top_ of the bottom plate (i.e. the inner edge, when the unit is
mounted on an H960), the distance to the outer edge of the flange is 1.62cm,
making the 'flange inner edge' to 'bottom plate side' distance 3.6 mm, at the
'top' of the bottom plate.
So 'z', the variance between the two, is indeed 0.5 mm. Pete's spot on!
Noel
a 486 jump to p5~ impressive!!
now to find one....
Collecting microprocessors is fun, and I am,trying to figure a way
display the entire array in one large glass panel over it. Perhaps use a
half of a sliding glass door as a cover over the display rack.frame.
Any other ideas>> Ed # _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 7/10/2015 9:56:24 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
scaron at umich.edu writes:
There absolutely was a P5 Overdrive from Intel for 486 motherboards ... I
saw a few of them in the wild back in the day...
good for searching... but if you want sharp images... get them on paper!
In a message dated 7/10/2015 9:52:40 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
rdawson16 at hotmail.com writes:
Most of the Byte magazines are here:
http://www.americanradiohistory.com/Byte_Magazine.htm
> Subject: Re: 80s magazines at Huntington Beach, CA estate sale
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> From: jws at jwsss.com
> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 21:33:39 -0700
>
>
>
> On 7/10/2015 7:45 PM, Brent Hilpert wrote:
> > On 2015-Jul-10, at 5:39 PM, jwsmobile wrote:
> >> <snip>
> >> Gizmo
> >> http://pictures.estatesales.net/931308/21760158/1.jpg
> > That's the rear of a 70s colour TV, the stuff on the side looks like
either/both convergence control or an early electronic tuning system with
individual channel tuning.
> >
> > Actually, it looks like a Heathkit with the plug-in modules along the
rear chassis, the manuals on top look like the right colour with the little
title window cut in the cover of Heathkit manuals.
> >
> > Here we go, compare:
> > https://www.flickr.com/photos/34737609 at N07/sets/72157613423708701
> >
> > I think the estate one is an earlier model, probably early 70s, with
the flickr-pics one probably a couple years later.
> The thing that made me ask was that the grey thing was possibly a 1/4 or
> larger motor, and maybe it was some oddly skinned disk drive. Now I see
it.
>
> My cousin built one of those and had the best workshop TV in full color
> till his wife made him put it in a box in the living room. Great fun
> with the controls that pulled out after that, but not near as fun as a
> 25" or so color tv on your bench.
>
> thanks for the info.
>
> I will try to get there tomorrow, may call you, Brendan and let you
> distribute the Bytes. I'm looking for a particular ad in the 70s thru
> 80's magazines and if I find it that would be all I want to keep.
>
> thanks
> Jim
=
PS: To clarify (if needed) what I mean by 'the flange': orient the piece as
it would be if it were on the H960 (i.e. with the little interior tabs at the
top, and the coloured panel on the front); the 'flange' runs down one side,
along the bottom, and up the other side: it's a continuous piece, towards the
back of the unit, in a plane parallel to the plane of the coloured front
panel. HTH.
Noel
> From: Steven Malikoff
> I'm not sure I interpret Pete's measurement of 33.1mm from the back of
> the flange to the front of the box, correctly. Noel also says the same
> 'from the back of the flange' so I must be missing something here.
Hmm. I thought for a moment I'd misread my calipers, but I checked again, and
3.80 is correct for the thing I measured, which is (on your IMG_3161) from the
lower end of i/j to the upper edge of d/g. So clearly we must be using
different definitions of 'flange', or something - or maybe his unit is
somewhat different from mine?
Here are the rest of the measurements from that image:
'k' = 'm' on mine, at 1.15 cm. That downward projecting flat (at one end of
'l' and 'm', which is at 90 degrees to the thing I'm calling the 'flange', the
thing with thickness 'i', which is completely horizontal - along two axes - in
that image) is cut back a bit, in the direction normal to the screen, from the
end of the upper part (at the left edge of 'k'), which is why they look, from
the slight angle in that image, like they aren't in a common vertical plane
(normal to the screen) - but they are.
'l' = 2.6mm; 'h' is 10.64 cm; 'd' is 5.73 cm; 'i' is 2.70 mm.
'g' looks to be about 4.6 mm; I should mention that the corner below it (at
the upper end of 'i') is not a right-angle, but a rounded thing with a fairly
considerable radius - something on the order of 3.5 mm. 'j' is 3.35 cm.
The edge labelled 'flush with bottom edge' is indeed flush with the left-hand
end of the horizontal flange.
On IMG_3162, 'q' is 1.16 cm; note that the left edge of 'q' is almost, but
not quite, in a plane with the right hand edge of 's'. The left edge of 'q'
is about 3.4 mm to the left of the right edge of 's'. 'u' is 1.13 cm. (This
turns out to be 'z' in the third image.)
Note that the little tab (the thing you're measuring 's' on) projects up
under the 'plate' which you're measuring 'u' on; i.e. the maximum width of
that tab, 't', is up underneath that plate. I can't measure it because it's
not a sharp angle where it meets the vertical surface (i.e. in the plane
normal to the screen) up under there; rather, it's a radiused corner (which
you can see in the next picture).
On IMG_3144, 'y' is about 1.56 cm (bit hard to measure that one; I should
have used a flat to give me good end point at the RHS to measure to); 'x' is
1.25 cm; 'v' is 9.1 mm (ditto); 'w' is 2.85 mm. 'a' I can't really give you
directly, but I can give you the distance from the upper end of a, to the
upper end of 'w', which is 7.96 cm; add that to 'w' and 'v' and that will
give you 'a'.
Noel
I'm just going to toss a feeler out there. One of my more recent most
sought after machines was the Yamaha C1, a 286-12mhz MS-DOS "laptop" with
11 midi ports.
I picked one up off of ebay, not cheap in it's non-working condition. I'm
now working on getting it running.
I'm looking for schematics or service manual. It's a long shot :-) I
contacted Yamaha of USA already and they said they don't have
documentation going back that far. Both paper or digital.
My unit when powered on never seems to do a floppy seek, or boot. Caps
lock and num lock don't trigger the LEDs. And it has an internal or
external display dip switch. The unit always comes up set for external
display, even though dip switch is set internal. I hunted inside and found
9 electrolytic caps were leaking. I cleaned up the mess and replaced them,
but still no go. The traces I can see that look on the fence all
continuity test okay.
I have more caps on the way to replace all of the capacitors, and next
step will be to look at the power supply output on an oscope to see how
good or bad it looks.
I have already archived the eprom data, and will be scanning all the
documentation and archiving the floppies. I will make it all available
online. I have some of the programming docs, some dip switch info, pinouts
for the expansion connector (but unfortunatly no hard drive controller
connector afaik) and more.
Schematics would be good to go with that, as the mainboard has more than 2
layers.
--
Ethan O'Toole
Hey. I'm sorry for the off topic post, but I couldn't think of another
forum to ask my question. I'm just looking for information as to whether
there are different sizes Pentium processor dependent upon whether the
processor is for a desktop or laptop. I want to see if I can give my old
Hewlett Packard OmniBook a little more juice.
I asked for advice a while back on what to expect with moving a pdp 11, I
was told to lock the heads in the rx01 and rx02 drives. I'M getting pretty
lost in all the information about the drives, are there any good guides or
sites with lots of pictures of the drives taken from different angles apart
so i can get a better idea of what im going to be working with? Also,
people tell me getting the drives off the rails and out of the rack is a
pain, where would i find the appropriate information on how to do that? I
really don't want to take the drives out of the rack, but if it comes to
it, i would like to know how. I am scheduled to pick this stuff up in 5
days.
--Devin
> But with an rdbms and a nice front then it could encompass all makes and
models.
Linux, a web page form, some PHP scripts and MySQL and we're done. Any
volunteers ??? :-)
One problem is going to be authentication. If it has any contact
information (and it seems like it would need to in order to be useful) then
it's gonna become a target for SPAM.
Bob
> From: devin davison
> I was told to lock the heads in the rx01 and rx02 drives.
Err, I think we told you to lock the heads the RL0x's, not RX0x's; the former
use large rigid packs, the latter are 8" floppy drives. AFAIK, there is no
need to lock RX heads when moving them - there is nothing in the manual about
RX drives being shipped from DEC with the heads locks.
> are there any good guides or sites with lots of pictures of the drives
> taken from different angles apart so i can get a better idea of what im
> going to be working with?
Not that I know of, but the DEC manuals (mostly available online) are adequate.
> Also, people tell me getting the drives off the rails and out of the
> rack is a pain, where would i find the appropriate information on how
> to do that?
See above.
> I really don't want to take the drives out of the rack, but if it comes
> to it, i would like to know how.
That's very wise - my last removal, it _really_ helped that I had read the
DEC manuals before-hand, as I wound up performing a removal I hadn't planned
on, and that had a tricky step I probably never would have found on my own,
but which I had luckily read about in the manuals.
Good luck on the move!
Noel
via The Rescue List
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Aaron Browne <gopodge at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:43 PM
Subject: [SunRay-Users] Surplus SunRay 2 and SunRay 3 Units -
Victoria/Australia
To: SunRay-Users mailing list <sunray-users at filibeto.org>
The company I work for is about to undertake a total endpoint replacement.
We are replacing all of our SunRay 2 and SunRay 3 devices - hundreds of
units of both types.
All units are in working order.
Is anyone interested in providing a new home for any of these devices?
Otherwise, they are going to be recycled.
Victoria/Australia is preferred destination but we can talk other parts of
Australia if required.
Cheers,
Aaron
_______________________________________________
SunRay-Users mailing list
SunRay-Users at filibeto.orghttp://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
--
raspberry-python.blogspot.com - www.pyptug.org - www.3DFutureTech.info -
@f_dion
_______________________________________________
rescue list - http://www.sunhelp.org/mailman/listinfo/rescue
> From: Steven Malikoff
> It appears the top edge projects further than the bottom by a tiny bit
> leading to a tapered appearance, but I assume the plane of the printed
> inset panel is parallel to the exterior mounting surfaces.
By top edge I assume you mean the top edge of the unit (we need a common term
for the entire injection-molded plastic thingy), as it would be when mounted
on the rack? And the distance you're talking about is the distance from the
very front of the unit to the flange that projects out around the unit on
three sides (sides and bottom), right?
OK, I'm measuring mine (with calipers :-), and from the back of the flange to
the front of the rim around the coloured insert, it is 3.80 cm at the top,
and... 3.80 cm at the bottom. So no tapering. (And it's the same on both
sides.)
> A common method of determining radii is to use an engineers radius
> guage.
Which I don't happen to have... something to add to my tool wish-list! :-)
> Failing that, try fitting a series of circular objects (coins etc.)
> which can then be measured with calipers or micrometer.
I did try with the butt ends of a number of large drill bits, but I didn't
get really good results. I mean, you can tell when it's way off (too small,
and the object 'lifts' off the surface at the outer edges of the object, too
large, and you get a gap in the middle), but there's a range in the middle
where it's hard to tell - it all depends on where you decide the ends of the
curved part are.
Oh, one note: when I gave the gap between the coloured insert, and the sides
of depression it sits in ("it's slightly smaller than the inset in the
plastic housing, by about .5 mm"), that .5 mm is on each side, not total.
Noel
I have requests from several list members to stop b y and do some shopping/
trading. I'm still on the mend from my latest replacement shoulder and will
be out of commission for quite a while yet. While not quite up to the show,
I have no problem with members stopping by. But I still have doctors
appointments, PT, etc.
I can see I-74 from my house and am about 10 miles west of I-57 by
Champaign, IL. There are several good routes to Chicago from here, which is
about a 3 hour drive.
If anyone wants to stop by I only ask that you make a ball park appointment
that will not interfere with my medical appointments. If I have an idea of
what you want (LA120s, monitors, other large things) I can have it out and
ready. I should be able to have some of my high school helpers to help pack
and load.
I'm not a morning person, but can make it work. Nighttime doesn't bother
me at all.
If I missed anything or have general comments, please reply. If you want to
set up a time or have specific questions, please contact me off list.
Many Thanks, Paul
found in the archives of CERN, this image is beautiful! but what IBM
system is this.
https://cds.cern.ch/record/1847692
--
Met vriendelijke Groet,
Simon Claessen
drukknop.nl
During my mid- to late-80s tenure at Georgia Tech, we had 2 x Cyber
180/855, 2 x Cyber 180/830 and 1 x Cyber 180/990. I'll have to ask around
for someone with better memory than me as to how many, but we had quite an
ocean of disks.
KJ
will this include micro vax also? Ed#
In a message dated 7/6/2015 8:03:25 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
aperry at snowmoose.com writes:
Is there any interest in starting a VAX-11/750 registry? I wouldn't
mind knowing who else out there has one and where they are now. If you
are interested, send me e-mail (vax11-750 at snowmoose.com).
alan
On 7/4/15 1:40 PM, Toby Thain wrote:
> On 2015-07-04 4:35 PM, Mattis Lind wrote:
>> Well. Despite all recent VAX-11/750 bashing it actually booted both
>> VMS 6.1
>> and Ultrix-32 4.0 today. ...
>>
>> BTW. The CPU of the 11/750 is contained on five extended HEX boards,
>> (L0002, L0003, L0004, L0008, L0011/L0016/L0022). Then there is the
>> optional
>> RMD (L0006) module and possible MBA and extra unibus adapters.
>>
>> I used a SCSI2SD card connected to a Emulex UC17 board.
>>
>> A booting 750:
>> ...
>>
>> ULTRIX V4.0 (Rev. 161) (vax)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> login: root
>>
>> Password:
>>
>
>
> As a fellow 11/750 owner (sadly, not yet restored), I salute you!
>
> --Toby
>
> From: Steven Malikoff
> a replica PDP11 masthead panel for the DEC H960 rack.
That would be great! (I'd buy one! Or more!) But how are you going to produce
the plastic housing? I suspect that's going to be harder than the inset
coloured panel.
> I need some help from the list, if possible - I would like the
> dimensions of the width and height.
The inset (the coloured part) is 8.45 cm high (it's slightly smaller than the
inset in the plastic housing, by about .5 mm); alas, I don't have a metric
ruler long enough to measure the width directly, but in Imperial it's
3-21/64" by 18-9/16".
I don't have a good way to accurately measure the radius in the corners, but
it seems to be about 8.5 to 9.5 mm.
> I also would like to know of the outer edge of the masthead is a beige
> colour, or even silver.
The raised edge around the inset panel is painted a dull silver - like the old
silver paint, but with a touch of grey in it. The edge itself is 4.1mm wide,
according to my calipers.
> The panel would be the inner bit with the radiused corners, the edges
> being a seperately cut panel which is in front of the the detailed one.
Not sure I follow this? The entire top unit, including the raised edge around
the coloured inset, is a moderately complex injection moulded plastic piece;
behind the front, it's kind of like a box that's open at the back, and there's
a ridge around the back edge on three sides; the bottom edge is shorter, and
the top edge is extended further back. Finally, there are a couple of internal
tabs where it actually connects to the H960.
If you want an original to copy, TopLine has one for sale on eBay (ignore the
ridiculous price they've got on it, they are very reasonable).
> I would also like to know how deep the recess is for the front. I
> suspect the same as the filler panel bezel edge, about 3mm.
4.0 mm by my 0.5 mm ruler.
> And also the depth of the plastic backing.
You mean, how thick is the plastic in the housing? 2.7 mm in one place, 2.8
mm in another, 2.3 mm in a third?
Interestingly, IYWR, in previous thread we'd mentioned how other people
produced their own insets; one for a terminal server, and one for the LISP
Machine. I looked at my LISP Machine one, which I had assumed was in a
similar housing, but it's not! It does indeed fit on an H960 (the early LISP
Machines were built in H960's), but it's quite different.
It's in an extruded aluminium unit (of constant cross-section), with no end
pieces (although the bottom plate has small squared cut out of the corners);
the extrusion's cross-section is exact a capital 'F', but upside down. There
are little square 'serifs' on the 'back' of the 'F' (the front side, when
installed), and the printed panel fits in between them.
Now that I look at it, it looks very similar to me to some things I seem to
vaguely recall being used on earlier DEC machines (either a PDP-6, or a
KA-10, I don't recall where it looks familar from). It being a more-expensive
aluminium extrusion makes sense; that was back when that sort of thing (along
with lots of lights! :-) was acceptable.
Noel
>Liam Proven wrote:
>>On 3 July 2015 at 18:22, Jerome H. Fine <jhfinedp3k at compsys.to> wrote:
>
>
>>I understand that Netscape has been replaced by Mozilla. HOWEVER,
>>since CHROME seems to be the most widely used, would CHROME
>>be able to support the retention of ALL of my old e-mails and posts
>>from usenet? Over the past 15 years, I probably have accumulated
>>over 100,000 e-mails and posts in about 130 folders! So I would like
>>an easy upgrade path which supports being able to view and modify those
>>old e-mails and usenet posts. Can CHROME support that?
>>
>>
>
>
>Chrome is just a web browser. It does not do email at all.
>
>However, the program that was called Netscape 6.x & 7.x is alive and
>well. It was the "Mozilla Internet Suite" -- the final Netscape
>releases were Mozilla, rebadged. As Mozilla Inc now focuses on
>Firefox, the old Internet Suite was forked and is now called
>SeaMonkey.
>
>http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
>
>SeaMonkey will run fine on Windows 7.
>
>What you may have to do is this:
>
>[1] Use an old version of Thunderbird (Mozilla's standalone email
>client) to import your Netscape 7 profile. Details here:
>
>http://kb.mozillazine.org/Migrate_from_Mozilla_Suite_or_Netscape_to_Thunder…
>
>[2] Use a newer version of Thunderbird to import the profile from old
>Thunderbird:
>
>http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_migration_-_SeaMonkey
>
>This should import your entire Netscape profile and continue to work just fine.
>
>However, in the first instance, copy your whole Netscape 7.2 profile
>from the Win98 machine to your unused Win7 machine. Reinstall Netscape
>7.2 on the new machine and check it works.
>
>You can download it here:
>http://sillydog.org/narchive/full67.php
>
>Then install SeaMonkey. It *should* notice and import your profile.
>
>It is very important to install Netscape *before* SeaMonkey.
>
Check
>Jerome H. Fine wrote:
> >Terry Stewart wrote:
>
>> I'm engaged in a Retrochallenge project where I'm recoding my
>> classic-computers.org.nz site to make it suitable for mobile
>> platforms. I
>> want to modernise the code as well, making it as close to HTML5
>> standard as
>> I can
>>
>> The RetroChallenge blog site is here.
>> http://www.classic-computers.org.nz/blog/2015-06-29-recoding-classic-comput…
>
>
> I checked this site under WinXP and found no problems. The software
> is very old, but a quick search did not locate the version.
As I mentioned, I backup up my Win98SE system, then accessed all
of the links under Netscape 7.2 without any problems.
>> In doing this, I will probably need to say goodbye to old browser
>> compatibility. As in old I mean Netscape 4 or earlier, and other
>> pre-2000
>> browsers (and possibly IE 6, as it's not very standard).
>
> As I noted in the statistics, I am one of the VERY, VERY, VERY few
> still using 32-bit Win98SE and Netscape 7.2 for e-mail and sending this
> reply. While I prefer to stay with Win98SE, I may upgrade to 64-bit Win7
> so I can use a faster computer to run the emulator that I use: Ersatz-11.
I understand that Netscape has been replaced by Mozilla. HOWEVER,
since CHROME seems to be the most widely used, would CHROME
be able to support the retention of ALL of my old e-mails and posts
>from usenet? Over the past 15 years, I probably have accumulated
over 100,000 e-mails and posts in about 130 folders! So I would like
an easy upgrade path which supports being able to view and modify those
old e-mails and usenet posts. Can CHROME support that?
>> The website does have a few articles and resources of interest to
>> vintage
>> computer hobbyists, which I wouldn't want to make inaccessible. The
>> question is, how many guys like us, those who dabble with old tech, are
>> likely to use ancient browsers as their ONLY source of web content. I
>> suspect not many. Should I worry about it? Any comments welcome.
>>
>> On a related note, I'd be interested if anyone on the list CAN'T read
>> this
>> page properly:
>> http://www.classic-computers.org.nz/blog/temp.html
>
> This link also found no problems under WinXP.
>
> I have not checked out either of the links under Netscape 7.2 since
> any problems might be difficult to correct. After I perform a backup
> of my C: drive and it will be possible to easily restore my system, I
> will try them.
As I mentioned, I backup up my C: drive, then accessed all of the
links via Netscape 7.2 and found then all without any problems.
>> It's a new blog page template I've developed using HTML5 and is mobile
>> friendly. If it doesn't show up properly I'll be interested to know
>> what
>> browser you're using.
>>
>> Please be kind about the HTML5 and CCS code. I don't do this for a job,
>> and it's a big learning curve for me.
>>
>> P.S. Here are some interesting stats. For myself, I've been a Chrome
>> user
>> for a number of years now.
>> http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
>>
>> Terry (Tez)
>
> Obviously, I am in the negligible category for still using Win98SE and
> Netscape 7.2 along with 1280 by 1024 for my video display. However,
> at least I upgraded to a flat screen monitor after both of my previous
> tube monitors died a few years ago. As I mentioned above, I will access
> the 3 links you provide after I backup my C: drive. I normally avoid any
> links to the internet on this Win98SE system and always restore the
> C: drive after I do so. If there is a link that looks interesting, I
> send
> an e-mail to the WinXP system and check the link there.
And just in case, I did perform a restore to my C: drive again. However,
under Netscape 7.2, I am able to CLEAN CACHE and that did seem
to restore everything back to before I accessed the links. At the very
least, all of the files that were placed into the \cache\ sub-driectory
were removed and the total number of files and sub-directories
reduced to the original value from before the links were accessed.
I don't know if making sure that there are no extra files and sub-
directories around after I use Netscape 7.2 to download my e-mail,
but I use that criteria to determine if anything that should not be
present has been added to the C: drive. I realize that pre-existing
files could have been corrupted, but I can't monitor everything.
Also, after I download the incoming e-mails, I physically disconnect
the cable to the router so that any e-mails with links that could be
activated to files that might cause a problem can't be completed
without the internet being available.
If anyone who has read this far has any comments or suggestions,
they would be very much appreciated!
> Under WinXP, I looked over your page on emulators. I don't know
> if you consider the PDP-11 and the VAX as classic, but they were not
> included. The PDP-11 has many emulators including Ersatz-11 produced
> by John Wilson at dbit. The SimH emulator also supports the PDP-11 along
> with the VAX and a number of other hardware platforms.
>
> Do you not consider the PDP-11 a classic system? I realize that most of
> the software is still legally proprietary, but hobby users are allowed to
> legally use early versions of the software under SimH. Mentec, who
> acquired most of the frequently used software from DEC, is no longer
> active with the PDP-11. The software IP seems to be with another,
> but that is difficult to verify, let alone to confirm whom to contact.
Terry, I have not seem any response yet. Did you see my reply?
Jerome Fine
>
> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:25:01 +0100
> From: Antonio Carlini <a.carlini at ntlworld.com>
> Subject: Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving a VAX-11/750)
>
> If the intention is to avoid a huge list then excluding MicroVAXes and
> VAXstations should produce a list of VAXen
> that you probably cannot easily simply carry home on the bus.
>
> That would unfortunately exclude the VAXstation 8000, which is pretty
> rare AFAIK. It would also exclude the VAXstation I,
> which I imagine is also relatively rare these days.
>
> I don't think you can easily come up with a simple set of criteria based
> on power connectors or buses or similar.
>
> Perhaps "too big to hug" is what you really want :-)
>
> Antonio
>
My VAXstation 8000 (Missing the E&S chassis) is too big and heavy to carry
home on a bus.
--
Michael Thompson
>Perhaps SDI is a typo for SBI, as in the 11/780?
Yeah, exactly. Sometimes the fingers are faster than the brain :-)
Synchronous Backplane Interconnect - the system bus used on the 78x and
some of the 8000 machines.
Bob
>Johnny Billquist bqt at update.uu.se wrote:
>some of the 8000-series stuff are probably the biggest ...
Not all of them. The 82xx/83xx family was just one 10-1/2" chassis for
the CPU - the same physical size as a 11/730, yet they were genuine single
or dual CPU BI bus VAXen. Of course, many of their brothers were quite a
bit bigger.
And don't forget the VAXstation-8000...
Bob
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 1:00 PM, <cctech-request at classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Having the primary CPU just stall, and have the second CPU normally just
> be idle until a page fault happens on the other hand is something I can see
> how it could be done.
?Indeed that is exactly how it was done on the Masscomp MC-500 and I
believe the original Apollo - this was know as "Forest Baskett Mode" - who
wrote up the idea in a letter/comment to one of the architecture groups in
the late 1970s when the chip was first released.
The primary processor is called the "executor" and the second ?is called
the "fixer." The fixer is either halted or runs a small loop keeping the
translation buffer (TB) full. When the TB logic detects a fault for the
executor, it is put in wait state and the fixer is restarted (if ned be)
and refills the TB. When it's valid the executor is allowed to come out
of wait state (a very slow memory fill).
When the 68010 was released we make a small change the CPU board (a couple
of PALs) and allowed the executor to actually fault. But the fixer still
did the TB fill. But the executor could do a task switch and run some
other code, while the fill was taking place.
I'm not sure if Apollo updated their original CPU board or just designed a
new one with the 68010, I would have to ask some one like Les Crudele to
find out for sure. And Sun never did the Forest Baskett dual 68K trick.
Sun-1's with 68000 ran a V7 version of swapping Unix (originally from
Unisoft) until the 68010 came out when they could support VM on the "SUN-2"
and Joy et all moved BSD 4.1 to it.
One other note about the MC-500. If was the first commercial
Multiprocessor UNIX (predating the 386 bases symmetric boxes but a few
years) as well as being the first real time UNIX box. I still have working
one in my basement. It has 4 CPU boards in it with a 68010 and 68000 on
each, plus a 68000 in the display processor, a number of 29000's in the FP
and APP's units, more 29000 logic in the Data Acq Unit, as well as 80186 in
the network processor. All in all, a pretty neat federation of processors
each doing their thing.
Pretty cool for early 1980s'
Clem
Well, I am once again re-subscribed to this list. Why it or its moderators
decide to unceremoniously unsubscribe me every few months without warning
is beyond me. Especially annoying when subscription requests always take
2-3 days to process. It would be _really_ nice to do a warning message to
people who haven't broken any list rules and haven't asked to be removed
before dumping them, especially if this is an automatically-triggered event
based on the member's lack of posting activity.
Just my two cents.
I have the docs and the ROM images from Nigel, but not the source.
I did my share of googling, nothing but a piece or two, and not the whole thing.
Anybody have this?
Thanks,
Randy
I recently picked up a full rack (
https://instagram.com/p/4yEZlYNSxx/?taken-by=tr1nitr0n)
It was an awesome project, now that I have a home where I can install 220v.
Unfortunately, one of the 4x R4400 @ 150mhz boards is shot, and the System
Controller is shot. I borrowed the latter from another Onyx system, but
don't like leaving systems in inoperable states.
Does anyone have these or other ONYX parts they'd be willing to part with
or sell?
Thanks!
- Ian
--
Ian Finder
(206) 395-MIPS
ian.finder at gmail.com
On 7/7/2015 5:43 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2015, at 3:43 PM, jwsmobile <jws at jwsss.com> wrote:
>
>> If there were a technical reason to keep it in a simple format that would be fine, but as Al K pointed out quite some time ago, Google already indexes all of this quite fine as it and most search engines do, so the list is text searchable.
> There are (at least) two fallacies here:
>
> 1) The entire planet has 24x7 ubiquitous and effectively free internet connectivity, and
>
> 2) All the visually impaired have software that can cleanly, accurately, and efficiently scrape the browser results these various web search pages display, and can articulate them clearly in an alternate format. This also goes for figuring out how to use the search pages to begin with.
>
> --lyndon
>
Not sure what fallacy you see here. The list goes to a location online
that is searchable. Search engines index the information from there.
Near as I can tell Jay plans on it being online 24/7 and there are no
blocks to search engines reading the information and including it in
their indexes.
Nothing about html format prevents search engines from capturing the
information as accurately as text formatting. My point is, that keeping
it in text format is not a requirement to make put it in a form that it
can be indexed.
And I pointed out that some people had warned that all of our
discussions were being included in search engines <Google>, as a
possible source of objection. I only included that point because the
same people lobbying for text form may also be the ones who may not want
list traffic in search engines, and I conceded that is a separate
point. Apologies to Al for dragging his name into the thread.
Not sure where your 2 points came from.
thanks
Jim
>P Gebhardt p.gebhardt at ymail.com wrote:
> wonder how the ratio of VAX 6000s and 7000s in enthusiasts' hands
> compared of VAX 11's in terms of numbers is? I guess that /780 and
> larger systems are rare, but I'd guess that there are some more /730
> and /750 around. No idea if my gut feeling reflects facts, though.
I know there are several people around with the larger VAXes in storage.
That's why I asked about the "working condition" - I'm sure the number of
big VAXes that could be switched on, say, this afternoon, is quite a bit
smaller.
FWIW, most 6000 machines weren't even that big. They're smaller than a
780 by quite a bit. I don't know about a 7000 or 10000 - I never actually
used one of those in real life.
Bob
Dwight, yes I think so as I am on many lists and some hate the
aol address more than others do
Ed#
In a message dated 7/7/2015 7:29:43 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
dkelvey at hotmail.com writes:
As providers get more crowded, they will have more bounces.
They tend to happen at times when a lot of messages are being
handled.
It seems that the list parameters were set when only a few bounces
happened. Times have changed.
I've only been back on the list for about a week and already it has
determined that my address has too many bounces.
There must be a parameter that can be set to adjust the sensitivity.
Dwight
=
I was contacted by a chap in South Africa (Pretoria area) who has the
following kit available. If interested, please reply to me directly and
I'll put you in touch.
* PDP-11/23, with dual RL02 drives and 9 disks
* 2x VT100, one modified to VT125
* DecPrinter III
* HP 70470A plotter
* RSX11-M 4 with manuals
* RSX11-M 3.2 (I think manuals only)
* Fortran 77 with manuals
* IBM portable (ca. 1982)
--
Steve Maddison
http://www.cosam.org/
Great idea! ? Ed#
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Christian Gauger-Cosgrove <captainkirk359 at gmail.com>
Date: 07/06/2015 8:17 PM (GMT-07:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: VAX-11/750 registry (Was: Reviving a VAX-11/750)
On 6 July 2015 at 23:03, Alan Perry <aperry at snowmoose.com> wrote:
> Is there any interest in starting a VAX-11/750 registry?? I wouldn't mind
> knowing who else out there has one and where they are now.? If you are
> interested, send me e-mail (vax11-750 at snowmoose.com).
>
Sorry for the scope creep; but perhaps it might be more
useful/interesting to make it a registry of any VAX that has a name of
the form "VAX-11/7xx"? (Which could also include the VAX 8600 and VAX
8650, since were originally to be called the VAX-11/790 and
VAX-11/795.)
Thoughts on that idea?
Regards,
Christian
--
Christian M. Gauger-Cosgrove
STCKON08DS0
Contact information available upon request.
Clearing out some excess stuff here
I have an ISA IBM 5250 Terminal Emulator Card. Comes with the DOS
software on a CD. Make A Fair Offer
IBM AT Clone. 640KB RAM 40MB MFM Hard Drive. Ethernet Card, set up
with mTCP. 1.44 3.5 HD Drive and 5.25 HD Drive. Has ATI VGA/EGA Card as
well Make A Fair Offer
Toshiba Satellite 4010 CDS 32MB RAM 2GB HDD.. Has 3.5 drive, CD-ROM and
Ethernet Card. Make a Fair offer
Dell Dimension M233a. 32MB RAM 8GB HDD. Ethernet. This is running
OpenStep 4.2 with fully supported video, networking and sound. 233Mhz
Pentium MMX Processor. It runs it really nicely. Make a fair offer
Everything here is 15 bucks each shipped in the USA
Microsoft Systems and Development CD-ROM Circa 1994
Windows For Workgroups 3.11 Disk Set
Windows NT For PowerPC, Intel, MIPS 6000, Alpha
MS-DOS 6.22 Disk Set
IBM Cartridge Basic for PCJr
Windows 95 Original Release on CD-ROM and Floppies with Book and Key Code
Thanks.
eBay feedback upon request and I accept PayPal. Or if you are in
Michigan and want to come pick it up you are more than welcome to
come. I am in Central Michigan, North of Mount Pleasant
Hi,
I'm engaged in a Retrochallenge project where I'm recoding my
classic-computers.org.nz site to make it suitable for mobile platforms. I
want to modernise the code as well, making it as close to HTML5 standard as
I can
The RetroChallenge blog site is here.
http://www.classic-computers.org.nz/blog/2015-06-29-recoding-classic-comput…
.
In doing this, I will probably need to say goodbye to old browser
compatibility. As in old I mean Netscape 4 or earlier, and other pre-2000
browsers (and possibly IE 6, as it's not very standard).
The website does have a few articles and resources of interest to vintage
computer hobbyists, which I wouldn't want to make inaccessible. The
question is, how many guys like us, those who dabble with old tech, are
likely to use ancient browsers as their ONLY source of web content. I
suspect not many. Should I worry about it? Any comments welcome.
On a related note, I'd be interested if anyone on the list CAN'T read this
page properly:
http://www.classic-computers.org.nz/blog/temp.html
It's a new blog page template I've developed using HTML5 and is mobile
friendly. If it doesn't show up properly I'll be interested to know what
browser you're using.
Please be kind about the HTML5 and CCS code. I don't do this for a job,
and it's a big learning curve for me.
P.S. Here are some interesting stats. For myself, I've been a Chrome user
for a number of years now.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
Terry (Tez)
OP (about the 68000 box) here ? thanks for all the informative comments!
I did spend some time using the 68010-based Apollo workstations, and as I understood it they were equipped with two processors, one shadowing the other, because not enough information was saved to completely restart an instruction ? particularly a block transfer ? if a memory paging operation was required. Apparently the 68020 somehow fixed this problem. (The 68008, BTW, was just a 68000 with limited address space and an 8-bit data bus. It was primarily targeted at deeply embedded systems, not ?general purpose computing? applications.)
Thanks for the clarification about V7 Unix not requiring demand paging; this makes complete sense, since it was never mentioned in any of the documentation I read. And yes, it it was Unix V7, not ?System 7? (sorry, it was a while ago...).
Thanks for the pointer to the Convergent Technologies boxes. This wasn?t them (the case was different: it was black, and horizontal-profile), but the functionality looks very similar; they could easily have had the same motherboard or other guts. Also, I forgot to mention in my original post that there was a 5-1/4? floppy on this thing, too.
~~
Mark Moulding
In the late 80?s, I bought from a surplus/junk shop a (by then somewhat obsolete) Unix computer, branded UniSys, I think. It had 10 serial ports; one was the primary console, one was intended for a printer, and the other 8 were regular user TTYs. The processor was a 68000 (not 010, 020, or anything else), I don?t remember how much memory, and it had an integral full-height hard drive as well (60 mB, maybe?).
When I say Unix, I mean real System-7 Unix ? not Linux or any other *nix. I thought it was really a pretty neat system ? 8 (or 9) users and a printer, just perfect for a small office ? or my apartment at the time, which had a terminal or two in every room. I learned how to program in Unix on that machine, since it matched exactly the System 7 manuals I had. Sadly, time moved on, I got married, and got rid of a bunch of ?useless junk?, like that computer.
Recently, I?ve been reminiscing and poking around some on the Web to try to find information about it, but it seems to have vanished completely with nary a ripple. Has anyone else stumbled across this unit, or at least have any knowledge of it? It was a black case, about the size of a standard IBM-PC, with ten serial ports on the back and not much else. I?d sure be interested to know where I might locate data about that unit, or (gasp!) possibly even an existing one...
~~
Mark Moulding