Whilst in a self-induced trance, e.tedeschi happened to blather:
>Scott Walde wrote:
While I fully agree with what Scott wrote in his (admittedly longwinded :-)
post, I'm not sure if it was stated simply enough....
>> Back to the religion thing again... If I was giving something away, and a
>> person wanted it to use it for some purpose which I am 'religiously'
>> opposed to (I can't think of a good example off hand) I would probably try
>> to find someone else to take the item. I think that this should be my
>> right. (I do have the right to practice my religion, don't I?) I hope
>> you can see how this applies directly to the computer issue.
To put it in 4 words, I believe Scott is saying: "Live and let live."
>So now the problem is clear...notwithstanding all the previous
>declaration to the contrary THERE IS a problem of someone being opposed
>to some other use (and possibly location) of the stuff. I think it is
>only fair that it is so.
If the problem is clear to you... could you explain it to me? My mind is
still dizzy from all this... :-) (Oh, and BTW, would you mind not yelling?)
>What is NOT fair is to try to hide it and find other excuses like...too
>difficult to pack... to expensive to be worth bothering with it....too
>much paperwork etc. Ain't we all in the same passion? If not then I
>would rather not be here.
Personally, I had no idea that they still "shipped" (pun intended) things
on "the Big Pond." I would not have even thought to look for something
other than airmail, and I can attest (as I live on the Canada-US border)
that Customs can be a right pain in the behind.
>See what I mean? (is this too much cultural for someone?)
Well, no.
Enrico, I do have one question: Are you waiting for someone to say to you:
"You're right?" If so, I don't believe you've presented enough evidence to
us to judge whether or not you are. I can say that several of the "points"
you've tried to make have been very vague and could be interpreted a number
of different ways. I've noticed that several people on this list has tried
to explain what they percieve to be going on, and I readily admit that I
don't know enough about what's going on. However, one thing I do know very
well is communication, and there does seem to be a major miscommunication
problem here.
I for one, would like to see you stay with the list, and yes, there might
be the occasional twit on the list as well, but I'm on 5-6 lists (two of
which I run), and I must say that I've seen fewer twits on this list than
on my others.
I have several friends I've met thru e-mail all over the world (and yes,
including the U.K... ;-) and I will say that I was offended with you're
insistance that this was a "foriegner" issue... This is called the "World
Wide Web" not the "U.S. Web." I can also guarantee that no matter what
country you visit, you *will* find at least one twit living there. Guaranteed.
Enrico, if you can clearly explain your position (with examples, if
necessary) to me in private e-mail, I would be more than glad to help you
out and would even be glad to act as intermediary between you and anyone
else with which there may be a communication problem. Otherwise, I'll go
back lurking and I will have no more to say about this thread. (I
promise!!! ;^> )
Just my tuppence worth,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger
--
Roger Merchberger | If at first you don't succeed,
Programmer, NorthernWay | nuclear warhead disarmament should *not*
zmerch(a)northernway.net | be your first career choice.
> > There is the matter of customs which many americans have little experien
> > with.
> I accept that....but you are such a big country. Isn't it about time you
> start looking outside and try to understand other cultures? (no offence
> meant)
I worked for several companies that was very good in that respect, Japanese
and European. I did exchange information and material on a very regular
basis however, it was another person in shipping that took care of details
of getting it there. AS an engineer the machanics of those transactions
were an inpediment to doing the work!
In short you are confusing the mechanics of transaction with cultural
interaction.
I have had only on case where I got something for the shipping cost and
depite care in packaging by the shipper a s100 box was received severely
bent! Over a certain weight crating is a must it would appear. I don't
have the resources to crate a machine.
For me save for that one long distance transaction other than for a floppy,
a board or paper/books(small under 2kg) to strictly local transactions
withing the driving distance of my old toyota pickup truck. As is, that
can prove difficult!
Allison
Just by coincidence here is an example I have just received just now
(there have been more before I started this debate; I don't that I am
paranoid, there is definetely something in this group which is
(generally speaking):
a) against "displays" (pulling out bits to display etc.)
b) Against shipping overseas (cost is no problem as is paid by the
recipient)
It took my some four e-mail messages to get to this message enclosed
here. See what I mean?
enrico
--
================================================================
Enrico Tedeschi, 54, Easthill Drive, BRIGHTON BN41 2FD, U.K.
tel/fax +(0)1273 701650 (24 hours) or 0850 104725 mobile
website <http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~e.tedeschi>
================================================================
visit Brighton: <http://www.brighton.co.uk/tourist/welcome.htm>
Subject: Mint Commodore PET FOR Sale
From: "Stephen McCoy and Charmiane Barr"
<mrsmrx(a)efni.com>
Date: 1997/06/17Message-Id:
<01bc7b43$fddee5c0$b8933dcf@charmaine>
Newsgroups: aus.computers.amiga[More Headers]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_01BC7B1A.15107EE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hey all If you are in the market for antique computers and
accessories I got one
for you--Commodore PET (Slim 25) with a working tape drive and
cable. The
unit works at its factory best standards as well as the tape
drive. If
anyone is collecting antique Commodore computer from the
seventies/eighties
this is a classic machine and there are few left in North
America.
If you wish to bid on this unit (only serious bids will
be
received/answered) please write an email to me at the below
address and I
will get back to you.Thanks for reading and have a good day.--
Stephen McCoy
"Quiet"mrsmrx(a)efni.comWise men are those with an open mind to
subjects others are not :]
I would suggest subscribing to the list in Digest form. One big email message per
day and you can skim through to the ones you want to read. Or just delete the
whole thing if you're not in the mood (heaven forbid!)
> > I just subscribed to this mailing list yesterday and am amazed at the
> > traffic. Just today, I seem to have received more than 80 messages!
>
> Which is why I'm dropping it.
>
References: <199706200702.AAA08312(a)lists.u.washington.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sorry to burst your bubbles, but the Commodore drives ARE 300 RPM like
most of the others, many 1541 flywheels have the speed-calibaration
diagram on them (use fluorecent light to determine correct RPM).
154s and the lot have software&hardware to adjust the density on
tracks so more data can be stuffed in inner tracks and allow the outer
ones to spread out. No special speed involved here.
It is because of this that many computers with dumb drives can't read
the 1541 format (including Amiga!) the controller cards seem to be
limited in this fasion. Thus there is quite a demand for 1541 drivess
and (pre-converted) .d64 files in the 64 emulator community. ;)
I think all the 5.25" Commodore drives were based on the variable
density initiated in the 2040 DOS. My Complete Commodore Inner Space
Anthology has differing sector counts on tracks on all the models (4040,
2031, 1541, 8050, 8250/SFD-1001) The hard drives (9060 & 9090) seem to
be uniform thoough.
Things changed with the 1581 disk (3.5") which uses a variation of the
MFM format, and can be readable with PC/Amiga computers (with the proper
software, of course.)
--
Taking quotes from that LA article on collecting:
> Most of these early machines and programs, which didn't work very
>well when they were new [IBM PC,MS/DOS], are even more troublesome to maintain now
>[Windows 95]--and have been rendered obsolete by wave after wave of new equipment.
>[Macintosh, Amiga, NeXT, etc., etc.]
Yep, translates to modern-day very well.
> Greelish, a computer repairman, has spent about $2,600 in recent
>years building a collection of 35 computers, mostly by trolling for
>bargains on the Internet.
$2,600 for only 35 machines???? Anyone have his address, I have some
64s for him!
--
"Altairless" Larry Anderson
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Visit our web page at: http://www.goldrush.com/~foxnhare/
Call our BBS (Silicon Realms BBS 300-2400 baud) at: (209) 754-1363
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Here's some TI/99 stuff that might interest some people.
Sam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Hole In The Wall now offers a small (but growing) selection of TI99/4A
parts and equipment as a service to the TI community. Our Web site
should be up within 10 days.
TI Peripheral Expansion Boxes - $40
TI99/4A consoles (black and silver) - $27.50 (orig. box, manuals, RF)
TI RS232 Cards - $40
TI Disk Controller Cards (SSSD) - $20
TI 32x8 Memory Expansion - $25
TI Writer (orig. cart, disk and manual in binder) - $10
Much more to come! Email for more info.
--
<= KEITH BERGMAN =>
The Glass Eye / Hole In the Wall Enterprises
PIT Magazine / Chicken Dog
kbergman(a)toltbbs.com
"just want a way not to be what gets sold to me" - Jawbox
--
Sam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
In a message dated 97-06-20 18:10:08 EDT
> Kai Kaltenbach wrote:
> > > > I'm kind of curious how many Altairs we have on this list. I've got
> > > > 3...
I suggest that a Classic Computer Rescue team head out to Kai's house and
rescue two of those Altairs. They could them be put up for adoption and
ultimately be given a loving home where they will be receive the INDIVIDUAL
care and nurturing that they deserve. :-)
Lou
In a message dated 97-06-20 03:16:54 EDT, Tim Shoppa wrote:
> Hmm. One of my friends got a LOT of apple II stuff from a business that
> > went under. One of the things he got was an 8" CP/M disk. I'm gonna go
> > try to get my hands on it. (It said CP/M on it). It may be
> > destroyed/gone by now. This was a year or two ago, before I got
> > interested in old stuff... Any way to tell what system it's for without
> > being able to read it?
The disk could be for an Apple system. 8" drive controllers where offered for
the Apple II line back in 1980 because of the huge (for the time) capacity of
DSDD 8" disks. I had a Lobo controller hooked up to a Franklin 1000 and two 8
inchers and it was pretty impressive. I eventually replaced the drives with a
10 meg Corvus hard drive (cost $5000). I've been trying to locate an 8"
controller for my Franklin 1000 for quite a while but haven't had any luck.
Lou
At 12:36 AM 6/20/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Gee, then I have an Apple bonanza worth $2000 in my garage. Whatever.
>This is what I am dreading of this hobby, that assholes like this Haddock
>guy start trying to price things out.
I think it's as someone said; at the time the book was written, Apple II's
were still in strong demand, esp. from the school market. My girlfriend's
school still uses and maintains a fleet of II's. (Schools simply cannot
afford to buy lots of new computers.) (Ask me, if you're interested, about
how macs ended up in her classroom.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)crl.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
In a message dated 97-06-18 02:16:46 EDT, you write:
<< His e-mail address is Mikeooo1(a)aol.com and he left his phone number for
me:
(201) 331-1313.
Please reply if you are interested in going in together on this.
Sam
>>
I would be interested in this.
Kelly Fergason
KFergason(a)aol.com
I'd like to buy. Can I reserve it? Please e-mail me with your address and
I'll send you a check. (woukd you prefer money order? some sort of trade? I
have scads of old computer stuff.)
Manney
----------
> From: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
> To: Manney
> Subject: FS: BOOK The History of Computers
> Date: Friday, June 20, 1997 1:52 PM
>
> For Sale:
>
> The History of Computers -A Family Alubum of Computer Genealogy-
> by Les Freed
> ZD press
> ISBN 1-56276-275-3
> all color and lots of pictures and illustrations
>
> $12 (shipping included within the United States, original price is
$24.95)
>
Sam,
I don't own any computers that use EBCDIC, but I use them every day at
work. EBCDIC - extended binary coded decimal interchange code is the
character set used on most (if not all) IBM mainframes and midrange
systems. (IBM S/390, S/36, S/38, AS/400 etc.) This set has its roots
in punched cards (and prior) and really makes more sense when viewed
>from that perspective vs. that of the way things are today. ASCII -
American National Standard Code for Information Interchange.
Back when I was in college, an instructor stated it this way:
(Speaking about the need for a uniform way to share info across
machines.)
"There are two ways to obtain a standard in the industry. The first
is to get a big committee together and have all parties involved agree
on what it should be (ASCII). Or, be the largest company in the
industry, do it your own way and force everyone else to adopt your way
of thinking.
Dan
---Sam Ismail <dastar(a)crl.com> wrote:
>
>
> DOes anyone have a computer which uses the EBCDIC character set,
rather
> than ASCII (did I get the acronym right? what does it stand for
anyway)?
>
> Just curious.
>
>
> Sam
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete,
Writer, Jackass
>
>
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________
Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com
> Today it would look a LOT different. Let's see, what WOULD it look like?
> Start with a PAL to generate the oddball clocks, and some misc decoding, f
> it, then throw a 32k skinnydip SRAM at it (OK, you can tie one address li
> to ground to limit it to 16K), an 8K EPROM (since that's what I've got in
> stock), say, an 8251 for serial I/O, and you've got a basic machine.
Actually a 8ksram and a 8kprom would do it. Or better yet a 2 or 8k EEprom.
That this is slow enough you could use the EEprom for sram! (the slow parts
was 20us and the real fast one was 10us (single byte instruction).
The real annoying part is capturing all the muxed status and syncing it.
Making the front pannel logic is the real work, it wouldn't be right without
the FP!
> What do ya think?
Tim, your a sick puppy. It's got style!
Allison
At 06:30 PM 6/18/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, Kai Kaltenbach wrote:
>> | ----------
>> | From: James Willing
>> | Subject: Re: Mark 8
>> |
>> | On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, Marvin wrote:
>> |
>> | > I need another project :) and I was thinking about building the Mark
>> | > 8 computer. Somewhere, I seem to recall that someone was having the
>> | > board sets for this computer made up, does anyone out there know
>> | > or remember who might be doing this?
>> |
>> | That would be me...
>>
>> If you get one of these up and running, I have a Scelbi book, "Space
>> Wars for the 8008 Microprocessor" with full hex code listings...
>
>I also have the three books -
>
> An 8008 Editor Program
> Machine Language Programming for the 8008
> Assembler Programs for the 8008
>
>I am such a packrat 8-)
>
>BC
>
>
Here I go volunteering again. Could those books be scanned/ocr'd? I'm sure
that the original authors wouldn't care, even if they did admit to writing
them. I have all the hardware and software to do that.
I have a softspot in my heart (and my head) for the 8008. That was my first
computer. I couldn't afford to buy something like the Mark 8, so I designed,
and built it, myself. By the time I was ready to retire it, I had an S100
video card (SSM), and a 9-track tape drive, running one track serial at 5k
baud. Used my own designed r/w amps, even. It ran great, just real slow.
I still have the CPU chip from that machine, holding down a piece of foam.
Seing these posts about the Mark 8 made me nastolgic. If I could get enough
data, I might consider building a new machine with that old "first CPU" chip.
Today it would look a LOT different. Let's see, what WOULD it look like?
Start with a PAL to generate the oddball clocks, and some misc decoding, for
it, then throw a 32k skinnydip SRAM at it (OK, you can tie one address line
to ground to limit it to 16K), an 8K EPROM (since that's what I've got in
stock), say, an 8251 for serial I/O, and you've got a basic machine.
What do ya think?
Tim Olmstead
timolmst(a)cyberramp.net
At 06:57 19/06/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>On Sat, 14 Jun 1997, steve wrote:
>
>> At 06:10 13/06/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>> >Of course this all assumes that I *have* a PC.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
><snip>
>
>
>Besides, I was talking about CP/M for the Commodore 1541 drive. That's a
>multi-speed drive that uses GCR encoding, not MFM. Try writing THAT with
>22DISK on your PC-clone.
>I used to know that only C=1570 and C=1571 were capable to read and write
CP/M disks in a proper way. (GCR+MFM)
By the way anyone else apart me owning a C=1570 here?
Ciao
> The oldest CPU type I have is an NEC 8080A. Still trying to figure out
> how to make use of it. The legs are pretty corroded (used to live in
> humid climates).
I could give you a dozen of them (all pre '80 date code or older!). You
need other parts to build a system using it. Minimally you need 8224 clock
chip and a 8bit latch or 8228 to get the status signals off the buss. The
rest if perpherals and memory.
Others from that (pre 1980) era I have:
IMSAI IMP-48 (works but, I really need a manual or schematic!!!) circa '79
If you've never seen one it's a small board with relays and opto IO for
control use, tty interface, cassette IO led display and keyboard for
programming(in hex!).
National SC/MP 8a500 cpu(late '78)
RCA1802(base cosmac elf 1979, board from the first PE article)
6502(old part)
TI9900 chip on board(technico super starter system)
moto 6800D1 kit('75-76)
LSI-11/03 card that's a tad older them most of those (functional too).
I also have a small system using the National nibbleBASIC (8070) chip in
1980.
Allison
> I know - this will be something I do in Electronics class next year.
> While everyone else makes an oscillator or something stupid, I'll build
> an Imsai!
You laugh, I did something along that line (1971) only it was a solidstate
Oscope of my own design. I wanted the class for acces to the tinshop so I
could fabricate the steel shields(for the crt) and chassis. If it were
three years later it would have been a mark-8!
While off the subject...
I had a Horizon up in '78 and put the NS* version of the pascal P-system.
Since I knew zip about pascal I decided to take a course that used pascal,
so happens it was data structures. Blew the proffessors mind when after
going on about the 1180 the class would use for assignments I asked if I
could use my own system if it conformed to Niklus&wirth. Seems he didn't
believe me until I brough the whole mess (left the printer behind) with me
the next class and set it up! It was the begining of the revolution as
Apples were also just starting to be seen. A year later that declaration of
I happen to have a suitable system was no longer an item of skepticism.
Sorta like the pocket calc in my EE junior year.... ;-)
Allison
> Define "plans". I have full sets of the schematics for the units in my
> collection (as I suspect many do), but if you are talking about the
> mechanical drawings for things like the case, boards, etc., I am not awar
> of those ever being made available.
The case was a standard box available at the time. Some of the inside
brackets were custom as were the layouts. I've never seen a full printset,
and I wonder if there really was.
Allison
For Sale:
The History of Computers -A Family Alubum of Computer Genealogy-
by Les Freed
ZD press
ISBN 1-56276-275-3
all color and lots of pictures and illustrations
$12 (shipping included within the United States, original price is $24.95)
| Does anyone still have the PLANS for one?
If you mean schematics, yes. The Altair was built from a kit, not
plans. You may be thinking of the Scelbi Mark 8, which was built from
plans.
Kai
> Does anyone still have the PLANS for one?
Yes but I'd build an imsai!
The altair was first but not that nice technically. Also the case, front
pannel and many componenets would have to be fabricated.
I happen to have a spare case and power transformer.
I'd love to get an imsai or 8800b box so I could fully retire(not sell) the
altair I have.
Allison
I'm kind of curious how many Altairs we have on this list. I've got
3... I know that Jim has at least 2. Who else?
| From: Marvin
| Someone that
| contacted me recently said that they had sold their Altair for
$3000.
Whom?
| Another story I heard (true?, I don't know) was that someone
advertised
| their Altair on the net for $4000. This person was flamed for
asking so
| much, and his only comeback was that it had already sold.
If this happened, it had to have been before 3/95, since there is no
reference to it in DejaNews.
| There was a
| reference in TCJ by one of the editors(?) that they wouldn't
be
| surprised by the price reaching $10,000.
I agree, though it's going to take a few years. People tend to acquire
items that they wanted when they were in high school or college. Those
people are now in their early forties, and that syndrome doesn't really
get going full steam until 50-60 (my father, with 7 Corvettes, is a
perfect example). I'd put the Altairs at $10K+ in 10 years. They sky's
the limit in 20 years, maybe $100K (all in today's money of course).
One reason for the expected price skyrocket is the number of people like
me (and several others on this list) who acquire them and will never
sell them, thus depleting the market.
Kai
Does anyone know where I can find equipment accessories for the PC8500
(NEC) laptop?
Thanks!
Mike
----------
From: Sam Ismail
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: Collector Article
Date: Friday, June 20, 1997 3:36AM
On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, Uncle Roger wrote:
> At 03:31 PM 6/19/97 -0500, you wrote:
> >prices listed for Apple equipment in "A Collector's Guide to Personal
> >Computers and Pocket Calculators" are quite high, possibly since the
book
>
> Apple II+ is quoted as $100-$200, the IIe $125-250. The Disk II is
listed
> as $75-150. Haddock's book is way high on some things, (seems) way low
on
> others, and, occassionally, is right on the money. Nonetheless, it *is*
> interesting, has some nice pictures, and is probably a good reference to
have.
Gee, then I have an Apple bonanza worth $2000 in my garage. Whatever.
This is what I am dreading of this hobby, that assholes like this
Haddock
guy start trying to price things out.
Sam
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
----
----
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer,
Jackass
>> I managed to get DOS 3.3 by finding a game or something that ran on
>> DOS 3.3, halting it with Control-C to get to the Applesoft BASIC
>> prompt, then using the file commands such as INIT to make a new disk.
>> I can't remember if DOS 3.3 has a built-in command that will copy a
>> disk... There's probably a way to do it.
>
>It's not built-in, but the DOS 3.3 distributions have the Intbasic
>program COPY which will do what you want. If you've got one of
>these crippled II+'s or later that only have Applesoft, you can
>still use COPYA.
I'm wondering if there's a way to hack code to get it to copy without
any System Master programs. I don't remember. I know the easy way out
would be just to get the System Master, but now I'm just curious. :)
--
Andy Brobston brobstona(a)wartburg.edu ***NEW URL BELOW***
http://www.wartburg.edu/people/docs/personalPages/BrobstonA/home.html
My opinions do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Wartburg College
as a whole.
At 18:08 09/06/97 -0400, you wrote:
>
>On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, George Lin wrote:
>
>> At 11:24 PM 6/1/97 -0700, you wrote:
>> ><...>
>> >> accessories including a CP/M cartridge for C64
>> >
>> >A CP/M _carthridge_? Awesome.
>>
>> I just tried it yesterday. Pretty cool. The Z80 is in the cartridge. The
>> package comes with a CP/M 2.2 diskette for 1541 and a condensed CP/M manual
>> by Commodore (copyright 1983). There is a K-Mart price tag on the original
>> box that reads $54. Not bad.
>
>This reminds me... I also have a Z80 cartridge for the C64. But it's not
>the one from Commodore. It's from a company called DATA 20 Corporation.
>
>I haven't been able to get it to work. It has what looks like a connector
>for a power supply on the back, but I didn't get the PS with it. It also
>came without any disks, though it did have a cassette in the box with it,
>which says "Use side A for Commodore 64/Use side B for VIC 20".
>
>It's a Z-80 Video Pak, that combines the Z80 processor AND an 80-column
>display adapter into one (big fat) cartridge.
>
>To quote from the box:
>
> The Z-80 Video Pak brings the convenience of an 80 column screen and
> the power of a CP/M compatible operating system to the Commodore 64.
>
> Designed to be used with a monitor, the Z-80 Video Pak lets the
> Commodore 64 owner switch to a 40 or 80 column screen in black and
> white, or back to the standard color screen. All switching is done
> through software and no cables need to be moved.
>
> The Z-80 Video Pak has its own Z-80 microprocessor and operating
> system which allows the 64 to run CP/M software formatted for the
> Commodore 1541 disk drive. A Terminal mode which brings communication
> with central data bases is included at no extra cost. The Z-80 Video
> Pak also supports the advanced screen handling features of all Video
> Pak models such as erase to the end of line, erase to end of screen,
> and dump screen to printer.
>
>
>If anyone out there knows this thing's power requirements (AAAGH! Another
>wall-wart!) and where to get CP/M disks in 1541 format, please tell. :)
>
>
>Doug Spence
>ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
>
>CPM DISKS Easy Download em from the net, make a 1541 lead to connect the
1541 to PC its in the DOX on C64s Emulator, Use a util on the PC called
Star Commander and copy stright to a real 1541. Easy!!! If you need more
info Mail ME..
Steve
Emulator BBS
01284 760851
Keeping 8-Bit ALIVE
Ok, here's the deal. Marvin & I are both in contact with a guy who says
he has 14 AIM65 units. Hopefully you all have been paying attention and
have read the messages describing what this is. Marvin & I are of course
both interested in buying one, and we dicussed the possibility that
others in the discussion would be interested as well. We feel that if
enough of us get together and offer this guy a bulk buy-out, we can get a
good price from him. Marvin & I are talking about $20 a piece as of
now. If this is of interest to anyone, I can give you his e-mail address
and you can ask specific questions, but make sure you mention you are a
part of this one-shot buyout so that we get a good deal. I think first
we should get a count of who is all interested and then approach the
guy. He's in New Jersey, and I don't think shipping should be more than
$5 per unit.
His e-mail address is Mikeooo1(a)aol.com and he left his phone number for me:
(201) 331-1313.
Please reply if you are interested in going in together on this.
Sam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
Huw Davies wrote:
----------
> From: Huw Davies <H.Davies(a)latrobe.edu.au>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: Altairs (was RE: Collector Article)
> Date: Friday, June 20, 1997 1:19 PM
snip
>
> Are there any other Australians on the list, and if so, any pointers to
> getting an Altair down under? In addition, I'm looking for an Epson PX-8
> (aka Geneva).
>
I'm in Australia (Sydney), been collecting for about 3 years and have never
seen or indeed even heard of an Altair existing in Australia.
To get one?, obviously offer $10,000 on this list and import it from the
USA.
Hans
You need a disk to boot, called "Catalyst" so you still boot from floppy,
but the disk initialized the Profile and that's what comes up. I have a
working profile, and its missing some of the directories on the menu,
anyone know how to edit the menu and stuff?
For merely a pre-paid envelop and a disk mailed to me, i'd be wiling to
copie the catalyst disk for you.
----------
> From: Kai Kaltenbach <kaikal(a)MICROSOFT.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Apple /// booting and Franklin question
> Date: Tuesday, June 17, 1997 6:35 PM
>
> I think I saw this go by once before on the group, but -
>
> - How do you get an Apple /// to boot from the ProFile?
>
> Also:
>
> - Does anyone consider the Franklin Ace 1000 Apple II clone very
> collectible?
>
> thanks
>
> Kai
Yes they made and External Disk ///, a joystick /// as well, I have both :)
----------
> From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)crl.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Re: Apple /// stuff (was: Re: This weekend's haul)
> Date: Thursday, June 19, 1997 9:31 PM
>
> On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, Doug Spence wrote:
>
> > > My internal floppy seems to be hosed. I can't boot any disks off of
it.
> > > Some bgin to boot but then go to error, others invoke this horrendous
> > > recalibration that never ends. I assume the drive head is dirty and
the
> > > speed needs calibrating. I wonder if I can calibrate this drive like
one
> > > can the Disk ][?
> >
> > Bummer. Is it not possible to use a Disk ]['s drive mechanism with the
> > ///? Internally or externally? Obviously trying to do so internally
> > would bring form factor problems, but I'm wondering if it could be done
> > anyway.
>
> I would guess that the controller is compatible with Disk ][ drives,
> although it would not surprised me if Apple purposely changed the pinouts
> or used a different connector to thwart anyone attempting to use a ][
> drive with the ///.
>
> > Thankfully my internal drive works, but I wouldn't mind hooking up a
> > second drive to it... and the chances of finding a Disk /// lying
around
> > are practically nil.
>
> I don't think they made such a beast...did they?
>
> > > Doug, if you want I can e-mail NuFX (ShrinkIt) images to you. This
would
> > > be the quickest way for you to get them. You'd need an Apple //
running
> > > shrinkit of course. The disk format between the // and /// is
identical.
> >
> > That would be great, thanks! I've never used ShrinkIt, but I can at
least
> > get stuff to and from my //e, and I've got two Disk ][s and a 512K RAM
> > card in it. I'll get ShrinkIt via FTP.
>
> ShrinkIt is easy to use. You'll do fine. I'll try to e-mail the images
> to you in uuencoded format sometime within the next few days (I am busy).
>
> > I don't suppose the /// disks are available at some anonymous FTP site
> > already? It'd be especially cool in .dsk format, as that's how I
transfer
> > all of my ][ software. (I never had a decent terminal program for my
> > Micromodem IIe, so I wrote a whole disk transfer program and extract
> > individual files when I have to once the disk image is on my Amiga.)
>
> I doubt it. It would be a good thing to do though.
>
>
> Sam
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer,
Jackass
At 11:50 PM 6/15/97 -0400, you wrote:
>So what exactly is a Victor 9000???
>Just another PC clone?
Not a clone, but similar. Max RAM was 768K, came with a Floppy Drive as
standard (IIRC). Was the first computer to use variable speed disk drives
(as the early Mac's did as well.) Ran an early version of MS-DOS, I think.
And, IIRC, it pre-dated the IBM PC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)crl.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 03:31 PM 6/19/97 -0500, you wrote:
>prices listed for Apple equipment in "A Collector's Guide to Personal
>Computers and Pocket Calculators" are quite high, possibly since the book
Apple II+ is quoted as $100-$200, the IIe $125-250. The Disk II is listed
as $75-150. Haddock's book is way high on some things, (seems) way low on
others, and, occassionally, is right on the money. Nonetheless, it *is*
interesting, has some nice pictures, and is probably a good reference to have.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)crl.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 07:49 PM 6/19/97 BST, you wrote:
>> I thought the idea of variable speed drives was to have the same
>> number/sized sectors on each track? Perhaps I goofed there too...
>
>Let's go through this logically.
Doh! It makes perfect sense the way you explain it. Thanks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)crl.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 07:36 PM 6/19/97 BST, you wrote:
>Oh, come on, an ST is _tiny_ compared to the sort of machines I run. I'd
>have no problem fitting another one into my 'machine room'. Now, if
>somebody offered me a PDP12, I'd start having problems..
There's a reason I'm concentrating on portable computers... 8^) But
seriously, I know a lot of people who have small studio apartments, where
they *truly* have room for only one computer.
>Why is the PSU a problem? I guess it's easier over here, where we have
Just that it takes up room... Sometimes every little bit counts!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)crl.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
Those of you who own systems that use SMD drives, take note!
RE-PC, Seattle, WA, has turned up a quantity (6 or 7) of Seagate 'Elite'
series SMD disk drives. These are small ones (physically speaking), in the
form of 5.25" full-height. They're brand new, still in their original
boxes, and appear to be unused.
I know these will go cheap, since SMD is useless to the PC world (thank
God!). If these are of interest to you, either drop by RE-PC (if you're in
the Seattle or nearby areas -- 1565 6th Ave. S, near the Kingdome), or give
them a call at (206) 623-9151. Ask for Steve Hess or Mark Dabek, ask
specifically about the Seagate SMD drives, tell them I sent you, and make
them a decent offer.
Enjoy!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)wizards.net)
http://www.wizards.net/technoid
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
>2) 80-Micro, TRS-80 Microcomputing News, Computer News 80, and 80-US
>Journal magazines, etc.
I think we have every issue of 80-Micro from Issue 1 to sometime
in 1989(?) when it became 100% PC based and we let the subscription
lapse. We even still have the 1982 (or was it 1983?) special 500+
page Christmas special.
I can see if we are willing to part with it if you are interested.
Later,
--John
At 10:53 PM 6/19/97 -0400, Mr. Self Destruct wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, Marvin wrote:
>
>> Kai Kaltenbach wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm kind of curious how many Altairs we have on this list. I've got
>> > 3... I know that Jim has at least 2. Who else?
>> >
>>
>> I have three.
>>
>
>I have none. :(
Me too :-(
OK, so I've always wanted to post a "Me too" response, and I've finally
done it :-)
Are there any other Australians on the list, and if so, any pointers to
getting an Altair down under? In addition, I'm looking for an Epson PX-8
(aka Geneva).
Huw Davies | e-mail: Huw.Davies(a)latrobe.edu.au
Information Technology Services | Phone: +61 3 9479 1550 Fax: +61 3 9479
1999
La Trobe University | "My Alfas keep me poor in a monetary
Melbourne Australia 3083 | sense, but rich in so many other ways"
Here's an article Doug Coward forwarded to me. You guys will get a kick
out of it, especially the price list at the end. $200-$400 for an Apple
][...yeah right. I have some property on the moon...
Sam
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Historian, Programmer, Musician, Philosopher, Athlete, Writer, Jackass
02490420 60320 THE CUTTING EDGE A Byte of History
Techies Taking a Scroll Down Memory Lane
Los Angeles Times (LT) - MONDAY August 12, 1996 By: GREG MILLER; TIMES
STAFF WRITER Edition: Home Edition Section: Business Page: 1 Pt. D
Story Type: Main Story; Infobox Word Count: 1,797
TEXT:
The nerds are getting nostalgic.
Barely 20 years into the personal computer revolution, techies
across the country are growing increasingly sentimental about the
machines and programs that changed their lives and ushered in the
Information Age.
For them, booting up a vintage Commodore PET computer can conjure
misty-eyed memories. Toggling the switches of an Altair 8800 is better
than gripping the gearshift of a first car. And a shrink-wrapped copy of
VisiCalc software beats a mint-condition Mickey Mantle baseball card any
day.
This is the memorabilia of the PC generation, and after spending
much of the last decade or two collecting dust in suburban garages from
Silicon Valley to Boston's Route 128, it's starting to make a comeback.
Virtual museums of vintage hardware and software are sprouting up
all over the Internet's World Wide Web, as are online classified ads
placed by collectors desperate to reacquire the technological wonders of
their youth. Some rare PCs are fetching much higher prices now than they
did when they were brand-new, and even revered institutions such as the
Smithsonian are bolstering their computer collections.
"The amount of activity that I see is amazing," said Kip Crosby,
president of the Computer History Assn. of California in Palo Alto.
"People are always asking me: 'Can you find me an Altair? Can you find
this or that?' I get 10 to 20 phone calls and e-mails a month, twice as
many as a year ago."
Most of these early machines and programs, which didn't work very
well when they were new, are even more troublesome to maintain now--and
have been rendered obsolete by wave after wave of new equipment.
But like certain cars or baseball cards, high-tech relics are
somehow enhanced by the passage of time. Collectors see them as the
symbols of a more colorful computer age populated by legendary
personalities who became billionaires--or, in some cases, went bust.
"That's why I'm interested in computer history," said Co Ho, 30, an
Internet administrator at Fullerton College. "Many people could have
made it big, but they fell asleep and ended up having somebody else
eating their cake."
Ho collects vintage software, especially programs that changed the
computing landscape but somehow faltered. One of his favorite pieces is
CP/M, an early operating system created by Digital Research.
CP/M might have become the operating system had Digital Research's
founder, the late Gary Kildall, been more hospitable when IBM came
calling to license his software. In a legendary blunder, Kildall and his
wife refused to sign IBM's confidentiality agreement, and IBM executives
took their business to a then-tiny company known as Microsoft.
"CP/M missed the boat because of casual behavior," Ho said. "It's
really a sad story."
Ho is one of the few people who collect software. More collect
hardware, and one of the most sought-after machines is the Altair 8800,
introduced by MITS Inc. of Albuquerque in 1975. It didn't have a
keyboard or a monitor, only rows of switches on the front of the box.
The Altair kit sold for $395 when it was new, but one in good
condition today can fetch as much as $1,500 because of the exalted
position it holds in computer history. Widely regarded as the first
mass-market personal computer, it launched a craze when it appeared on
the cover of the January 1975 issue of Popular Electronics. Bill Gates
even dropped out of Harvard to develop an early version of the Basic
programming language for the Altair.
The Altair "established Bill Gates in business," said Gwen Bell,
founder of the Computer Museum, a Boston mecca for computer lovers. "One
of our prize treasures is the original Basic tape that Bill Gates
developed on the Altair."
Collectors tend to pass over some of the most popular early
machines, such as the original IBM PC and the 1984 Apple Macintosh,
because there are just too many of them. Scarcity counts, which helps
explain why the most valuable collectible is the Apple I.
Introduced by Steven Jobs and Stephen Wozniak in 1976, the Apple I
was nothing more than a circuit board. It had no keyboard, no monitor,
not even a case. It sold for $666, and only a few hundred were produced.
A well-preserved Apple I can fetch as much as $12,000 today,
sometimes more. An Apple I signed by Jobs and Wozniak sold for $22,000
at a fund-raiser auction for the Computer Museum several months ago,
Bell said.
That kind of appreciation has attracted the attention of even
non-techie collectors.
"I got a call from an investment advisor for a Wall Street banker,"
Bell said. "He asked: 'Should I get him into collecting old computers?
Will they increase in value more than art?' I said, 'I don't know--I'm
not a dealer.' "
In fact, there aren't any prominent dealers of antique computers, at
least not yet. But a few collectors are hoping to change that, including
David Greelish, founder of the Historical Computer Society in
Jacksonville, Fla.
Greelish, a computer repairman, has spent about $2,600 in recent
years building a collection of 35 computers, mostly by trolling for
bargains on the Internet. He uses search engines such as Yahoo to root
out online classified ads for Altairs and other vintage machines, and he
keeps an eye on alt.folklore.computers, a newsgroup where history buffs
hang out.
"Ultimately, I would like to see (the Historical Computer Society)
grow and publish magazines and books," he said. "I'd like to start
displaying our collection and even restoring computers for sale."
Greelish and others said would-be collectors should look for
machines that look clean, have all the original equipment and
documentation and still run. A number of guidebooks are available,
including Stan Veit's "History of the Personal Computer," published by
WorldComm in Asheville, N.C., and "A Collector's Guide to Personal
Computers and Pocket Calculators," published by Krause Publications in
Iola, Wis.
Experts urge caution, however. There's no guarantee that old
computers will grow in value, and they are very difficult to maintain.
"If you've never opened up your computer and looked inside, this is
probably not the collectible for you," Bell said.
Instead, experts say, this is a hobby better left to people who were
enthralled by the recent PBS documentary "Triumph of the Nerds," people
who still have a soft spot for monochrome terminals, "Chiclet" keyboards
and the odd shapes of the early machines.
But even among techies, there are plenty of people who scoff at this
new fad, including Kim Nelson, service manager at ACP Superstore in
Santa Ana. Founded 20 years ago, ACP is one of the oldest computer
stores in Southern California, holds swap meets that attract legions of
collectors, and might be one of the region's best unofficial museums.
The store's top shelves are crammed with artifacts of computer history,
although Nelson calls it junk.
"Isn't it amazing that we have computer folklore now," he said,
walking with a reporter along rows of vintage Commodores, Imsais and
Tandys. "That's kind of sad when you think about it. Seems to me there
are things that are a lot more important."
But as he uttered those words, service technician John Krill walked
by and surveyed the line of creaky machines. Almost against his will,
Nelson was sucked into an episode of technology reverie.
"Look at that Kaypro," Krill said. "That company grew so fast they
were warehousing their inventory in tents."
"Weren't they the ones that had the fire too?" asked Nelson, perking
up just a bit and eager to demonstrate his techno-trivia prowess.
The conversation drifted from machine to machine.
"When I was in college, I would just leave my Osborne up in the
library," Krill said with a laugh, recalling the immobility of the first
portable computer. "The damned thing weighed 27 pounds. I didn't want to
lug it around."
Fifteen minutes passed before the two realized that their walk down
memory lane might have strained the attention span of their guest.
"That's enough, John," Nelson finally said with an embarrassed grin.
"You're boring him."
Greg Miller can be reached via e-mail at greg.miller
atimes.com
(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX / INFOGRAPHIC)
Computer Collectibles
Here are some of the PCs attracting the attention of nostalgic
techies:
Model: Apple I
Year introduced: 1976
Original price: $666
Current value: $10,000-$12,000
*
Model: Mark-8
Year introduced: 1974
Original price: $250
Current value: $3,500-$4,000
*
Model: Scelbi 8H
Year introduced: 1973
Original price: $440
Current value: $1,200-$1,500
*
Model: Altair 8800
Year introduced: 1975
Original price: $395
Current value: $1,200-$1,500
*
Model: Imsai 8080
Year introduced: 1975
Original price: $440
Current value: $400-$600
*
Model: Apple II
Year introduced: 1977
Original price: $1,195
Current value: $200-$400
*
Model: Osborne I
Year introduced: 1981
Original price: $1,795
Current value: $200-$300
Descriptions:
Apple I: With no monitor, no keyboard and no case, the Apple I was
little more than a circuit board. Only a few hundred were produced.
Mark-8: A kit computer that was the subject of the first magazine
article describing how to build a computer. The article appeared in
Radio
Electronics Magazine in 1974.
Scelbi: Predated the Altair and was the first computer based on a
microprocessor advertised for sale. Only a small number was made.
Altair 8800: Programmed by switches, the Altair 8800 had no
keyboard,
no monitor and just 256 bytes of memory. But it is widely regarded as
the
first mass-market personal computer. The Altair, based on an Intel
processor, started a craze when it appeared on the cover of Popular
Electronics magazine in January 1975.
Imsai 8080: Modeled on the Altair, the Imsai had several
technological
advances and a more polished look. Had no keyboard or monitor but was
briefly the fastest-selling personal computer.
Apple II: This is the machine that launched the company--and the
personal computer industry. Apple II computers came with a keyboard,
monitor and two disk drives. Most important, they ran VisiCalc, the
original spreadsheet program that was the personal computer's "killer
application."
Osborne I: Considered the first portable computer, even though it
weighed about 30 pounds and was the size of a suitcase. It had a 5-inch
screen, two floppy disk drives and 64K of RAM.
Sources: Stan Veit's "History of the Personal Computer," published
by
WorldComm, Asheville, N.C.; David Greelish, president, Historical
Computer
Society, Jacksonville, Fla.; "A Collector's Guide to Personal Computers
and
Pocket Calculators," published by Krause Publications in Iola, Wis.
AL SCHABEN / Los Angeles Times
At 05:10 PM 6/19/97 BST, you wrote:
>I really don't see the interest in emulators if the real hardware still
>exists. I'd much rather have the real thing, and have all the fun of
>maintaining it, than have a piece of software (probably without source)
>running on a PC that I can't get spare chips for. Perhaps it's because I'm
>a hardware hacker, but emulators seem to lack so much compared to the
>phyusical machine.
Perhaps it's because you have a bigger apartment? I know a lot of folks
running ST emulators on PC's because they wanted both, but didn't have the
room...
"lack so much compared to the physical machine..." yeah, 2nd ps, 2nd
keyboard, 2nd monitor... 8^)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)crl.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
At 07:38 AM 6/19/97 -0400, you wrote:
>> standard (IIRC). Was the first computer to use variable speed disk drives
Okay, I dug up where I got that idea from (ACM/Computer Museum Computer
Bowl, 1994, Round 3, Toss up question #6):
"6. The Victor 9000 computer featured an innovative design in its disk
drives. What was unique about the disk drives?"
and the answer was:
"6. Variable speed"
So in between reading that, and now, "innovative" transmogrified into "first
of its kind". Sorry about that!
>That's how it gets 21 sectors on tracks 1 to 17, 20 sectors on tracks 18
>to 24, 18 sectors on tracks 24 to 30, and 17 sectors on tracks 31 to 35.
I thought the idea of variable speed drives was to have the same
number/sized sectors on each track? Perhaps I goofed there too...
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)crl.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
Marvin <marvin(a)rain.org> writes:
> It seems every time I turn around, I find something else I either
> haven't seen in a while, or don't know anything about it. In this case,
> I picked up a brand new Digilog 1500 some number of years ago. It is
> not on the "Big List" so does anyone know anything about this? I seem
I wonder if this is the same Digilog that made the Digilog 600 that is
sitting in my office at work. It is not a general-purpose computer,
but instead a serial line analyzer: one of those things that you plug
in between two uncooperative serial communications devices to divine
the nature of their uncooperativeness. It's also got a breakout box
built in, and you can tell it's portable because it's got a handle
(think Osborne 1 for some idea of its arm-lengthening properties,
though). And a 3.5" stiffy drive for saving and replaying traces.
I last used it in 1995, and have moved it along with me to different
offices because no-one else wants it. It works well enough for what
it is, but it doesn't understand IP, SLIP or PPP-in-HDLC at all. That
is the sort of stuff we need to look at these days and we have better
tools for doing that.
-Frank McConnell
dseagrav @ bsdserver.tek-star.net wrote:
>I like my real PDP better than the emulated one. The real one has one
>feature that E11, and Supnik 2.2, and all the rest can NEVER have that
>annoys my family to no end - THE EAR-SPLITTING NOISE! :) It drives them
>Nuts, and I can't get enough of it! There's nothing like powering up the
>11/23 and hearing that "Bwaaaaa!" as it all spins up - then it becomes a
>gentle roar (I don't have a rack or case of it, so it sits out on a
>table). Everyone leaves, and I'm free to hack alone. Not to mention the
>emotional satisfaction that you own a piece of history - No matter how big
>or inefficient the piece! Which was the primary reason I went out of my
>way to get one. And the reason I kept my CoCo, and my C64.
Has anyone who has their mini collection displayed on a web page
put the *sound* of their machines on the net? I especially love the sound
of those big fans and hard drives powering up.
Whenever I get around to fixing up my 11/730, I'll definitely have to get
a recording of it powering up: from the turn of the key, to the ratcheting
sound
of the TU58 microcode boot tape, to the sound of the LA-120 printing
terminal
printing the 'enter date and time' prompt.
Actually, I don't have the LA-120, but remember the sounds.
Clark Geisler
Test Engineer
Nortel
Due to massive amounts of caffeine & sleep deprivation, Kai Kaltenbach said:
>Tandy 600
>
>Introduced:
> October 28, 1985
FYI: Mine was built in September, 1985, so I would imagine they would need
some time to ramp up production for the introduction.
>Storage:
> Internal 3.5" 360K floppy
> (storage only, not bootable)
Not bootable, 'cause it boots from ROM. BTW, SSDD 80 Track, 9SPT.
>Ports:
> RS-232 and Centronics parallel
>Bus:
> Proprietary for external floppy or "other peripherals"
I'm at work, 600 at home (awaiting new internal nicads...) but unless Tandy
or Zenith (OEM) designed a floppy-port-based whatever, the external floppy
port is a 1-for-1 pinout of a standard floppy interface... so you can hook
up either a 3.5" or 5.25" floppy, provided it's 80 tracks or more. (That
means I could hook up my 2" floppy, if I designed an interface cable, as it
only has a 22-pin cable (all standard signals, plus power... just need to
align the signals.)
> One option ROM socket (accessible by removing
> Multiplan) that holds BASIC or other ROMs
>Power:
> AC adapter, and built-in NiCd batteries
AC adapter is 8V DC, 1.5A, IIRC. (hafta look when I get home...)
>Modem:
> Internal 300 baud
>Operating System:
> Proprietary ROM
It's called HH/OS, (Hand-Held Operating System... tho I doubt you'd call
the 600 a hand-held!) and it was produced by MicroSoft.
>Applications:
> Built-in System Manager, Word, Calendar, File,
> Telcom and Multiplan
>BASIC:
> Optional ROM cartridge
>Keyboard:
> 72-key
>
>Pricing:
> Base system $1599
> BASIC ROM $129
> 96K RAM upgrade $399
Didn't the Basic ROM originally cost $139.95, or did it go up from
original? (I'll have to look that one up in my '89 catalog...) Tandy still
sells the ROM, and they still want $120 for it!!!!! :-(
HTH,
"Merch"
--
Roger Merchberger | If at first you don't succeed,
Programmer, NorthernWay | nuclear warhead disarmament should
zmerch(a)northernway.net | *not* be your first career choice.
>You do need the system disks in order to make copies of disks.
Maybe. For the longest time, I didn't have a DOS 3.3 System Master for
my IIGS. I thought DOS 3.3 was a neat OS because you could make your
own bootable disks easily. (You can with ProDOS too, but I didn't know
that at the time.)
I managed to get DOS 3.3 by finding a game or something that ran on
DOS 3.3, halting it with Control-C to get to the Applesoft BASIC
prompt, then using the file commands such as INIT to make a new disk.
I can't remember if DOS 3.3 has a built-in command that will copy a
disk... There's probably a way to do it.
--
Andy Brobston brobstona(a)wartburg.edu ***NEW URL BELOW***
http://www.wartburg.edu/people/docs/personalPages/BrobstonA/home.html
My opinions do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Wartburg College
as a whole.