Kai Kaltenbach wrote:
>Other front panels... hmm.
>
>The Ithaca InterSystems DPS-1 had one.
>
I still have a DPS-1 in (mostly) good shape. Unlike the IMSAI flat toggle
switches it had the triangular ones like DEC PDP-15s. Personally I
preferred the IMSAI ones (memories of bloody fingers after toggling in a
long binary on an Altair front panel with it's knife edged switches). The
DPS-1 works but the motherboard connectors are shot...I got it from a
plating/foundry company, covered with crud from the sufuric acid vats next
to it. Now if anyone has a nice new pristine Morrow 20 slot motherboard to
replace the "etched" one...
The other nice feature of the DPS-1 was an o-scope trigger mode on the front
panel, sort of a poor man's one channel logic analyzer. If I remember
correctly, it also knew something about 24-bit addresses.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yowza! [SMTP:yowza@yowza.com]
> Besides the Apple 1, does anybody know of a computer system that has
> actually appreciated in value? :-)
>
I assume you mean machines that are worth more than their original purchase
price. That would be a pretty short list... notably:
- IMSAI 8080 (assuming a base system; a fully configured setup would have
cost thousands)
- MOSTech KIM-1 (it was so cheap originally it can hardly avoid appreciating
since it's a significant historical piece)
- Rockwell AIM-65 (ditto)
- RCA COSMAC VIP (ditto)
If we adjust 1970s dollars to today's rate, not even the Altairs go for more
than the purchase price. That leaves only the Apple I in the appreciating
column.
The only other micro systems (besides the Altair 8800s & Apple I) that fetch
significant money, but are nowhere near appreciating from original cost,
are:
- IBM 5100
- Altair 680
- Processor Technology SOL
- Commodore PET (chiclet version)
- Apple Lisa
- Unproduced prototypes of Atari 8-bit or Commodore equipment
Kai
Regarding the three Altair machines that were recently posted
to the net auction at ebay.com - they went from $1525 to $2025.
Mind you, these weren't complete systems. The software, extra
drives, etc. were auctioned separately.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Sam Ismail Replied:
>> I also had one homebrew S-100 with the Wameco front panel, which used hex
>> displays for address and data but otherwise was identical to the IMSAI
front
>> panel. Does anyone remember other front panel S-100 cards besides MITS,
>> IMSAI, Ithaca, and Wameco? Wasn't there a Byte-8 sold by Olson
Electronics
>> for a while that also had a front panel?
>Yes, the Byte-8 had a front panel with, I believe, a hex keypad and a two
>digit 7-segment LED display.
Was that just a display driven from a boot ROM or was it a real front panel,
with displays directly driven from the bus, examine/deposit, single step,
etc.? Usually a hex keypad meant a simulated front panel (CPU actually
running a debug program in the boot ROM). A true front panel needed 16 LEDs
or 4 hex digits for address, 8 LEDs or 2 hex digits for data, and at least 8
status LEDs for bus signals (SINP, SOUT, MEMR, INTA, etc.). All the panels
I have seen also had an extra 8 LED latched output port and sense switch
input port.
>From cad at Mon Feb 23 17:06:14 1998
From: cad at (Charles A. Davis)
Date: Sun Feb 27 18:32:11 2005
Subject: front panels
References: <61AC5C9A4B9CD11181A200805F57CD54D09C92(a)red-msg-44.dns.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <34F200E6.40C2(a)gamewood.net>
And then there is the Astral 2000.
Full front panel (16 address/data switches, 16 leds) and a 4 digit hex
display also. Switches to 'load' address or data, run/step, int. etc.
When the machine is running normaly, the hex display is used as a
'clock'
This machine uses a MC6800 chip.
Chuck
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
He, who will not reason, is a bigot; William Drumond,
he, who cannot, is a fool; Scottish writer
and he, who dares not, is a slave. (1585-1649)
While he that does, is a free man! Joseph P. 1955-
-----------------------------------------------------------
(be sure to correct the return address when using 'reply')
Chuck Davis / Sutherlin Industries FAX # (804) 799-0940
1973 Reeves Mill Road E-Mail -- cad(a)gamewood.net
Sutherlin, Virginia 24594 Voice # (804) 799-5803
>Yes, the Byte-8 had a front panel with, I believe, a hex keypad and
a two
>digit 7-segment LED display.
The Byte Systems' BYT-8 didn't have a keypad or LED display, just 24 toggle
switches and the usual binary LEDs. The front panel plugs directly into the
backplane.
> On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Jack Peacock wrote:
> Does anyone remember other front panel S-100 cards besides MITS,
> IMSAI, Ithaca, and Wameco? Wasn't there a Byte-8 sold by Olson
Electronics
> for a while that also had a front panel?
Other front panels... hmm.
The Ithaca InterSystems DPS-1 had one.
Somewhere kicking around I do have another "front panel" card that could
hardly have been used as a literal front panel... I believe it was made by
Jameco or somesuch. It's a full-and-a-half-length S-100 Z80 single board
computer card (it's so long, it couldn't have fit in any case) with several
segments of alpha display, and a 24- or 30-key keyboard-style keypad.
Kai
I was just given a Panasonic Exec. Partner. It looks like a laptop on
stearoids. It should have been called a lugtop. It has a red plasma
display, full keyboard, twin 5 1/4" floppy drives and a built-in
printer. It comes with a convenient folding handle that swings out of
the way (so as to not destroy its sleek lines presumeably) and boots
fine. Unfortunately no paper came with it so I'd appreciate any
information on when this was marketed. It's PC DOS compatible so that
dates it post 1981 at least.
Marty Mintzell
<From: "Daniel A. Seagraves" <DSEAGRAV(a)toad.xkl.com>
<KL0: 176510 300 <<< What is that?
real time clock or line time clock
<DM0: 170500 440 DH0
DM is the DH mux and is 8lines
<KB9:KB24 disabled - no DH0: controller
You have to have 3 controllers for that many lines I believe and it only
found one.
<And wasn't DM0: a disk controller? Am I supposed to reset the CSRs to th
Its that DH muxed serial line thing you looking for. you may have set
CSRs though Tim S may know the specifics for U-bus.
Allison
Roger Ivie <IVIE(a)cc.usu.edu> wrote:
>On the other hand, CP/M-68K is available from http://cdl.uta.edu/cpm/.
>A lot of it is written in C; with some work, it can be modernized and
>updated. What could be more retro than building the ability to port
>CP/M to anything with a C compiler?
Darn, I had this idea, too. I was going to port it to the Palm Pilot.
I looked at the code, and discovered a few things that the owner of
that page (Tim Olmstead) hadn't found.
I think CP/M-68K was cross-compiled under Alcyon C on a VAX 11/780.
(Alcyon also produced an OS called Regulus that was available
for Smoke Signal Broadcasting's 68000 systems.)
The source contains the name "Tom Saulpaugh", and a web search
turned up a book "The JavaOS? Design and Architecture" he wrote.
He's at Sun as the architect of JavaOS for Network Computers.
Tom Mason also works at Sun, and he worked at DRI on CPM-86,
Concurrent CPM-86, and CP/M-86+.
Novell appears willing to release source, but Tim suspects that
there's no one around willing to discover or document what's
available - if anything. For example, the source to CBASIC
should be around, but they haven't released it.
- John
Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
<No, it's just something about REALLY LARGE frontpanel boxes that rules.
<The KA-10 is plain awesome. It's not only a real good hack, but it's
<the foundation of timesharing and the ARPAnet. I'll probably never see o
<in action, so I'm amassing as much information as I can - maybe it can b
I have and it's more than awesome.
<re-built? Who knows, they used discrete components...
Half the problem is finding one that is complete enough with minimim
peripherals. The peripherals also eat power. just the cpu with a hack
to use modern disks for power and space savings wouldn't be out of line.
As to being discrete, the answer is mostly not completely. It's a
hackable machine.
<Of course, this is WAY out of my league, but if I keep docs around...
You never know.
Allison
On the subject of BBC video problems, it occurs to me that the BBC micro
does scrolling by moving the pointer to the start of the screen (under
some conditions?). If you can get it to do this, and see how the
display behaves, you may be able to determine easily if it's an
addressing problem.
Just a thought.
Philip.
>Oh, and as per a previous mail by someone that you had replied to with
a
>hotmail.com account (so this isn't at you directly, but I cannot find
the
>intermediate mail): Last I checked, Russians don't use dollars, they
use
>Rubles. I have a 1990 5 Ruble proof coin I purchased in East Berlin
while I
>was there in my collection. (25 years ago, most coins were cheaper than
>computers -- now it's the other way around!) So I was making a
statement
>about the pitiful (IMHO) status of the American dollar, just to clear
>things up.
Not to go too much off topic, but I made the russia comment, because I
was born in the USSR, and it is very apparent to me. They DO use rubles,
but before they artificially deflated it (with a clone case :), the
xchng rate was something like 5000 Rubles to a US Dollar. I was watching
a Russian comedy program a few days ago, and they mentioned that Russia
has more dollars than the US, discussing the aid US gives them :)
Actually, dollars are pretty much common there now, with slightly
greater value.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
And I was losing bidder in one on the net recently, consisting of an 8800a
and two 8" drives.
It went for $1800
A
-----Original Message-----
From: John Foust <jfoust(a)threedee.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, February 24, 1998 2:34 AM
Subject: Altair price check
>
>Regarding the three Altair machines that were recently posted
>to the net auction at ebay.com - they went from $1525 to $2025.
>Mind you, these weren't complete systems. The software, extra
>drives, etc. were auctioned separately.
>
>- John
>Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
>
>
William Donzelli quoted me as having written:
>> All 3090 models are indeed water machines. The 3090 was IBM's large
>> mainframe of the late 1980s.
>
> Are you sure that there were not a few air cooled models towards the end?
> I have an air-TCM from, I believe, a late 3090. I paid two bucks for it.
> In hindsight, I should have purchased all of them in the chassis (25 or
> 16, I do not remember offhand.
OK. To be strictly accurate, all 3090 models of which I am aware are
water cooled machines. I was a student when I worked at IBM - a year
before going to university, and two summer vacations - after which I
somewhat lost touch with them. My last job with IBM was in 1988, and
not at the marketing location where I had worked before, but in a
factory building cash dispensers. My last real knowledge of IBM was
>from 1987, then.
>> involved!) to replace the strange 400Hz thingies. And a little circuit
>> to provide a 400Hz heartbeat if the machine uses this at all...
>
> This is probably the best solution.
>
> It probably does monitor the 400 Hz, and machine check if it goes away.
> Remember, these machine monitor EVERYTHING (like the earthquake sensor in
> some of them - give them a good kick and they will report a seismic
> check).
Ouch! But you may get away with providing a fake "ac good" signal,
rather than ac for it to monitor.
> The "Mill" was chopped up into smaller rooms - our room just happens not
> to have mice power, but the one next door does.
Strange - I shouldn't have thought it took much to power a mouse :-)
Still, this means you shouldn't have much difficulty with the upgrade.
Philip.
fyi, interesting time line of the microcomputer: "Chronology of Events in
the History of Microcomputers"
http://www1.islandnet.com/~kpolsson/comphist.htm
- glenn
+=========================================================+
| Glenn F. Roberts, Falls Church, VA
| Comments are my own and not the opinion of my employer
| groberts(a)mitre.org
<Is it possible for a RQDX3 to be bad, and trash a RD53 (Yes, I know what
<terrible drives they are) to the extent they can't be formated in a VS200
Yes and no. Yes I've had drives a VS2k would not touch but the drives
were otherwise ok. The PDP-11 formatter would however format them. Most
of the drives I have that the VS2k didn't like were formatted on my CP/M
crate using a teltek card(oddball format) or the older PC mfm controllers.
You could have an incorrect hookup, power problems or other things going
on. Are the RD5x's powered from the same powersupply as the rest of the
system (in the same box)?
RQDX3s do fail though the failure modes can be vary varied as they have
their own PDP-11/memory/eprom on board. If it passes self diagnostics
it's a 98% safe bet, if it's self testable it's ok. That does mean there
are parts that selftest cannot verify.
<So my question is, am I just having very bad luck or is the controller m
<problem?
I think your suffering from a multitude of things and with an apparent
lack of docs to reference too. Your trying to attack it was if it were
a PC and it's not even close. Those drives generally don't fail that
suddenly and my expereince is they are generally reliable. But when you
start with a box of junk it's hard to get to a know working point.
Me I have Q-bus PDP-11s that can boot faster and off a wider variety of
devices so any testing is done that using good old RT-11. I also have a
set of diags for that platform so testing things like disks, tapes and
interfaces is doable either with diags or by using them. At some point
I have know good boards and questionable seperated and can move the known
good to the uvax. PDP-11 and uvax Qbus commonality can be handy.
Allison
The person I've been getting a bunch of DEC stuff off of has a whole pile
of TU-58 tapes that he would like to get transfered over to something he
can read. I'm wondering if there is anyway I can attach the TU58 drive
I've got for my PDP-11/44 to my MicroVAX II and copy these tapes for him.
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
| For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |
<I'd say it's not so much a matter of there being "no need for them"
<(front panels), so much as the fact that machines are so fast any more
<that I'm not sure how much use they'd be, especially with
<multi-tasking operating systems. Before the address and data LEDs
<stabilized with any useful information, it would be somewhere else.
In some respects that is true even back then when instruction cycle
time were in the 2-10uS bracket. You did get to see the average
addresses that were freqently accessed. However, front pannels also
posessed the ability to stop the cpu, and single step or single
instruction advance it. A true front panel on a PC would have to be able
to do that and that is no small trick considering the caches, Dram refresh
and other dynamic timings.
< -Bill Richman
< http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bill_r
< (Home of the COSMAC Elf Simulator!)
Cosmac ELF sim? Humm, I still rin one of those chips for fun.
Allison
Hi!
Anyone know what a HP 935 is? I assume it to be a Hewlett Packard laptop
of some sort, with an LCD display, but I don't know if it is MS-DOS,
CPM/M, a full laptop or one of the Tandy Model 100 computers, or what. :(
A mining company just offered me a pile of them (along with my choice of
their old computers), but I figure I should know something about them
before I make the journey.
Thanks heaps,
Adam.
Is it possible for a RQDX3 to be bad, and trash a RD53 (Yes, I know what
terrible drives they are) to the extent they can't be formated in a VS2000?
I'm still trying to get my VAXstation II/RC up and running, and I was
trying to load it with a questionable tape today. I booted with a
standalone backup tape and started reloading. I then proceeded to get a
parity error, which I told it to ignore. It sat around for a couple of
hours not doing much of anything, so I halted the system and unloaded the
tape.
Then later on today I went to load it from a known good system tape, only
this time standalone backup wouldn't see the disk. Thinking the drive
needed reformated I pulled it out, and put it in my VS2000, and when I go
to format it I get the following.
>>> t 70
KA410-A RDRXfmt
VSfmt_QUE_unitno (0-2) ? 0
VSfmt_STS_Siz .??
VSfmt_RES_ERR #2
84 FAIL
>>>
I had formated this same drive in this same system early last week with no
problem. I just hadn't had time until today to try loading it. This is
the second Hard Drive that has quite working and I've been unable to format
after placing it in this system. I have yet to actually get the system to
work with a Hard Drive (although the standalone backup recognized the one
earlier today).
So my question is, am I just having very bad luck or is the controller my
problem?
Thanks,
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
| For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |
I have two counterpoint unix boxen. I've had these things for years but
have never got around to fixing them up. They both have the IO
subsystem, but they are also both missing many parts. I was wondering
if anyone has experience with these things and mebbe some
documentation. I _do_ have an original 60M QIC of counterpoint unix
that I could dupe if anyone is interested (although I haven't checked
its reliability recently)
Cheers,
Dan
sorry about that rus is the game still, avail.
At 06:43 PM 22/02/98 -0800, you wrote:
>where are you at dan i live in castlegar bc canada i will take it if it
>doesent cost to much
>At 12:22 PM 22/02/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>any body want my coin op pong machine
>>
>>
>
>
>
Well kids and kiddies I got it functioning. The int. fdd wasn't
positioning the heads close enough to the disk to read them.
Fired up the various OS -- TRSdos 2.0 A , TRSdos 4.2 , CP/M
2.25 and the apps. Scripsit, Profile+, Visicalc, several terminal
programs and some CP/M apps. including MBasic and the C asm.
Wheeee !! What fun !! BTW, it says has 64k . Don't know
about that upgrade tho. Next step is to check out these HDD s.
Thanks to all who contributed.
ciao larry
lwalkerN0spaM(a)interlog.com
where are you at dan i live in castlegar bc canada i will take it if it
doesent cost to much
At 12:22 PM 22/02/98 -0800, you wrote:
>any body want my coin op pong machine
>
>
found a homepage for the last home computer ti ever produced it wascalled
the ti 99/8 it can be seen at
http://w3.gwis.com/~polivka/998.html
At 10:01 AM 22/02/98 -0500, you wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Jun 1997, Sam Ismail wrote:
>> On a scarcely related note, has anyone ever seen (or does anyone have) a
>> TI-99/4 (no "a")?
>Andrew Gurudata has a page devoted entirely to the TI-99/4 at:
>
>http://www.vex.net/~guru/ti/ti994nota.htm
>
>
>--------------------------------------
>Rich Polivka
>Alternate e-mail: copguy(a)geocities.com or ti994a(a)technologist.com
>TI Home Computer Page: http://w3.gwis.com/~polivka/994apg.html
>My Ohio Police Pages: http://www.cop-spot.com/~OhioBlue
>------------------------------------
>
>
>
MSX was a "standard" that allowed machines to share mostly BASIC source
code, it was popular in Europe for about 3 tears then died. I don't know the
involvement of MS in that atempted "standard" but since it was crappy from
the start I would believe they originated it ;). I think it was followed by
MSX2, it was enhanced to keep up with the increase in computing power.
>So many Z-80 CP/M machines... were they compatible, to a reasonable
>extent? (I heard that MS had some standard in Japan for the purpose
>called MSX. More info on that?)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fran?ois
Visit the Sanctuary at: http://home.att.net/~francois.auradon
PS what's the deal with that hotmail stuff?
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Found this post in misc.forsale.computers.other.systems. Thought I'd
copy it here in case anyone was interested and hadn't seen it. I know
nothing about the person or the systems.
>From: dmanley(a)cdsnet.net (Darrel Manley)
>Newsgroups: misc.forsale.computers.other.systems
>Subject: Free antique computers!
>Date: 22 Feb 1998 17:36:01 GMT
>Organization: MegaNews!
>Lines: 3
>Message-ID: <6cpnm1$9ma$6(a)news-02.meganews.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: d01a852f.dip.cdsnet.net
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
>X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (16bit)
>Xref: news.inetnebr.com misc.forsale.computers.other.systems:34283
>
>2 Osbourne OCC-1 computers, modems installed, all documentation and software
>included. You pay shipping. Otherwise - landfill!
-Bill Richman
bill_r(a)inetnebr.com
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bill_r
(Home of the COSMAC Elf Simulator!)
>Uh, really? Last I knew, Aceropen was a division of Acer, which
everything
>I've seen is some of the nastiest junk in the world (read: worse than
>Packard Bell)...
I've had an Acer. It was nice, except very hard to open. It always
jammed.
>Just my $0.00002,
Come ON, stop making fun of Russian money! Just because it's
inflated doesn't mean it's worth less ;)
>Roger Merchberger | If at first you don't succeed,
>Owner, MerchWare | nuclear warhead disarmament should
>zmerch(a)northernway.net | *not* be your first career choice.
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This sounds about right.
If I counted the number of characters before the repeat, couldn't I then
identify the stuck line?
Then, perhaps... I could go to the hardware? Am I making sense?
A
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, February 22, 1998 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: BBC Model B - video help
>Unlikely but possible. More likely is a memory address error. A stuck
>address line will cause data to repeat 2*n times in the display memory.
Hey!
I just landed pieces to an 1802 kit! I've got everything but
the hex keypoad and power supply (though I'm sure +12, +5, -5 would
do the trick). This is not one of those single board computers like
the ELF-II, it's made up of several boards which connect to the main
unit via ribbon cables. Here are descriptions of the boards:
Primary board with 1802
labled "Infinite"
Part Number UCE100001
dated 1976
This board has a rather large crystal which appears to run at
135khz (if I'm reading the markings right). A large blue 3000 MFD
capacitor, some smaller disk .01 uf capacitors, and these chips:
4) RCA 701 CD4001AE
1) RCA 631 4049AE
2) 2606B (I think this is the 256 bytes of RAM)
The board also has a two sided 36 connector per side edge
card, which connects to nothing. Next to the 1802 is a red ribbon
cable which attaches to another board containing four LED readouts and
a singfle LED light (attached to the Q bit I suppose). Each LED (but
the Q light) has F9368DC 7705 - one for each LED). The second board
is listed as INFINITE 1976, UCE30004.
On an unattached board are two LED's, four chips and a 24 pin
socket (empty - I guess for a monitor ROM). This chips are:
2) RCA 701 CD4001AE
1) M1-0110-5 (7649)
1) MC14013CP (7438)
The last unattached board contains three switches and three
buttons, with a metal faceplate labeled UC 1800. The buttons are
labeled Reset, Start/EF1, and Enter, the switched are labeled ON/OFF,
STNDBY Power, and Load Mode. This board also has four chips:
3) MC14013CP (7438)
1) RCA 636 CD4011AE
Both of the unattached boards connect to the primary board via
a ribbon cable terminated by a 14 pin DIP; there are two 14 pin DIP
sockets on the primary board. It's unclear which board should be
plugged into which socket.
I also snagged pices to an SC/MP kit, along with a bunch of
DOCS and old COMPUTE newsletters dating from 1978 or so (WOW!). Also
got a COSMAC Microprocessor Product Guide (think I could call up RCA
and order any of the things listed therein????? - HA!), and an
original RCA 1800 Users manual (WOW!), in almost pristine condition.
As a kid I put together an ELF-II in 1980 (I was 12), so I
have some familiararity with this line of processors (could never get
over the gethi instruction yuck yuck yuck). Looks like I need to put
together a hex keypad and P/S to get this up and running. Anyone have
any ideas? Also, this things is missing the CDP 1861 video driver
which my old ELF-II used to have - what's up with this? I wonder what
happened to all those old late 70's kit manufacturers... I don't see
any FAQs out on the net for those old ELF's, KIMS, SYMS, and AIMS. Oh
well, relpies by the curious and knowledgeable would be most
appriciated.
Thanks!
J. Maynard Gelinas
Well, at the hamfest yesterday I got a VT220 terminal, an HP-IL/HP-IB
converter(maybe now I can use my HP 2225B...), a Laser 128 with two
monitors(broken Zenith and working Apple Monitor III) two disk drives(Apple
Disk II and a clone) a box of Apple II cards(mostly printer cards), a Hayes
Micromodem II(110/300bps switchable, Apple II card and a box that sits
outside the computer), two huge 9600bps leased line modems(kinda useless,
but they were free!), an IBM 3180 terminal keyboard(but no terminal...),
and of course I couldn't leave without getting a battery for my TH-205
radio. Everything seems to work except the VT220 keyboard and the Zenith
monitor, and I have no way of testing the modems but they ligth up when
plugged in, and I'm hoping that the 3180 keyboard will work with my 3191...
-JR http://members.tripod.com/~jrollins/index.html - Computers
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/1681/ - Star Trek
I have a non-working Radio Shack Model 12 computer, some software, and some
documentation that I would gladly give to someone who could use them. I
don't think that the unit would be worth the cost of shipping as the
computer is probably useful only for parts for someone who has one already.
I know that one disk drive (it has two 8-inch drives) is bad. It was
physically ruining diskettes by scraping off the coating in a ring toward
the center of the diskette. In the process of inspecting the unit to check
out the drives, I managed to break off a nub of glass near the CRT socket
and the vacuum seal was broken. If someone wanted to fix this unit, he
would need one good 8-inch, half height drive and a new CRT. So far as I
know it has one good drive, a good motherboard, power supply, keyboard, and
whatever other electronic boards as might exist (I don't remember). The
computer was working at the time I finished it off mechanically except for
the bad disk drive.
I also have the Model 12 Owner's Manual and TRSDOS-II Reference Manual, a
brand new copy of TRSDOS 2.0B Version 02.0B.00 from Radio Shack special
orders dept., a copy of Pickles and Trout CP/M for the Model 12, and a copy
of SuperCalc 2 with P&T CP/M. I also have a plastic dust cover for the
Model 12.
I live in the Chicago area. If anyone is interested in picking up the unit,
send me an email, and we'll make arrangements. If someone wants the unit
enough to pay the cost of packing and shipping via Mailboxes Etc., I'll
check into costs, but I doubt that it would be a good investment. Let me
know of any interest.
Gerald
At 02:11 AM 2/22/98 -0500, you wrote:
>> <No, it's just something about REALLY LARGE frontpanel boxes that rules.
>> <The KA-10 is plain awesome.
>
>Yes, frontpanels do. It is a shame that no computer has had one since the
>1970s. There just is no need for them anymore.
>
>What was the last machine to have a switch register and lights? The oldest
>I can think of is one of the HP1000s (help me with the model number!).
HP1000s with front panels:
2114
2116
2108
2112
2109
2113
2111
2117
The 2117 was the last of the family. Its also known as the 21MX F series.
The 2114 was the first. A huge 4K of Core memory...
2108 and 2112 were the original MX family
2109 and 2113 were the MX-E series
2111 and 2117 were the MX-F series.
There were a few more flavors as well used in combination with instruments
like
the 2105A.
Regards,
Don
>Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 00:41:45 -0500
>Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
>From: Ward Donald Griffiths III <gram(a)cnct.com>
>To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
>Subject: Re: Future Computing Trends
>
>Max Eskin wrote:
>>
>> I agree wholeheartedly with all you say with one exception. I have a
>> Pentium 75 overclocked to 100, 16MB ram. It runs Word 95 just fine,
>> and ran it fine when it had 8MB. Visual Basic and IE4 (I don't use
>> it regulary, Opera at www.operasoftware.com is much better: 1MB
>> download!)
>> work fine too. I can only imagine how Linux would run. But to put
>> this in a classical context, I agree that old computers are still
>> useful, but I so wish that they had better displays :)
>
>I defy _anybody_ to say that a "better" display would improve any
>Big Five Software arcade games as they ran on the 128x48 monochrome
>graphics of the TRS-80 1/3. And I defy anybody to find a better
>batch of arcade games, unless you really want to see the blood from
>kicked-in faces, a fetish I outgrew 25 or so years ago.
>--
Who says I want it for arcades? I don't play games much anyway.
Whatever happened to desktop publishing, CAD, photoediting?
What mostly annoys me is how little I can fit on an 80X25 text mode
screen compared to 1280X1024 resolution and small font.
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
On Tue, 3 Jun 1997, Sam Ismail wrote:
> On a scarcely related note, has anyone ever seen (or does anyone have) a
> TI-99/4 (no "a")?
Andrew Gurudata has a page devoted entirely to the TI-99/4 at:
http://www.vex.net/~guru/ti/ti994nota.htm
--------------------------------------
Rich Polivka
Alternate e-mail: copguy(a)geocities.com or ti994a(a)technologist.com
TI Home Computer Page: http://w3.gwis.com/~polivka/994apg.html
My Ohio Police Pages: http://www.cop-spot.com/~OhioBlue
------------------------------------
I went to a trift store and found an interesting looking 5 1/4" disk. It's
copy righted to Vector Graphics and Digital Research and is labeled Vector
4 CP/M Version 1.0 Release 2. Does anyone know what it's for?
Joe
the 9533 i had was preloaded with os2 but now i'm running pcdos7 and win3.11
just fine. i trying to get a pcmcia nic to work but having problems. the nic
worked in my thinkpad but i dont remember how i had my autoexec.bat and
config.sys set up.
i do not remember the memory inclusions and exclusions that need to be set up.
david
<< What kind of networking problems are you having? Do you have the PCMCIA
model? Some of them had a token ring card instead of PCMCIA.
Obligatory 10-year-old-plus story: HSC also has a DG/One (I think they
want $45 for it) and an odd-looking Morrow portable that wasn't in very
good shape. I passed on both, so if anybody is looking for these things,
check with these guys:
http://www.halted.com/
-- Doug >>
I asked about this one a little while back.
Nobody knows what it is, apparently.
Datanumerics DL8A. It is 8080 based,
comes in a 19" rack mount case, has 4k 600ns ram, 1 current loop (I
think) port, and obviously a full front panel.
I ended up paying about US$150 for the DL8A, a Compucolor 2, and a PET 2032
A log? Maybe, but I'm curious about the DL8A. If there's any interest,
I'll place images on my website when it arrives.
A.
ah, the 9533! i bought two nonworking ones for $30 and fixed them both! i gave
one to my brother that is still in warranty for two more months. these
machines have 3 year warranty and some are still under warranty. Im having
problems getting a nic to work, but a cute little machine nonetheless. i love
the keyboard too. i have never seen the matching lcd though.
david
In a message dated 98-02-20 01:06:49 EST, you write:
<< > All PS/2 starts with 85aa-yyy,
Not all of them. One of my favorite odd-ball computers is the IBM PS/2e
(9533). It's a very small low-power desktop model with 4 PCMCIA slots.
One of mine even has an external flat panel VGA display. Because of the
low power consumption, I use one as my home LAN internet gateway.
BTW, does anybody have an extra floppy and cable for one of these things?
It uses a notebook floppy drive and a notebook-like cable (mylar?). >>
We are looking to convert a PCjr computer into a serial terminal
emulator, and our limiting factor is finding how to adapting its serial
connector to a DB-9. Has anyone done this? We do not want to spend money
on this, this is a student project. I apoligize for butting into this
list as I can't find how to subscribe, so please reply by personal email.
Also, if anyone knows of a good dos program to use for this project,
please let me know
Jeff DeMaagd
jdemaa17 !at! calvin.eduhttp://www.calvin.edu/~jdemaa17
64-bit Alpha Linux OS user.
So many Z-80 CP/M machines... were they compatible, to a reasonable
extent? (I heard that MS had some standard in Japan for the purpose
called MSX. More info on that?)
>To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
>Subject: Re: NorthStar Advantage Question
>
>Joe wrote:
>>
>> At 07:05 PM 2/20/98 -0500, you wrote:
>> >I just bought a Northstar Advantage.
>>
>> Ok what's a NorthStar Advantade?
>
>
>They started as Kentucky Fried Computers and were later forced to
>change their name to North Star Computers....according to Stan
>Veit. The Advantage was a 64k Z80A running at 4MHz. It had two
>built-in floppy drives...ran CP/M. Late 70's I believe.
>
>Win
>
>--
>Win Heagy
>wheagy(a)erols.com
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
At 02:46 PM 2/20/98 PST, you wrote:
>and ran it fine when it had 8MB. Visual Basic and IE4 (I don't use
>it regulary, Opera at www.operasoftware.com is much better: 1MB
>download!)
If you think that's cool, you need to check out what they are doing with QNX:
http://www.qnx.com/iat/createdemo.html
QNX is a very small micro-kernel OS that has the look of Windows 95, has
builtin TCP/IP networking, a notepad, a few other little doodads, and to
top it off, a fully functional HTML 3.2 compliant web browser. Also
supports graphics modes up to 1024x768 in millions of colors.
Okay, not amazing enough for you already? How about if I told you it all
ran off a 1.44mb floppy disk? Hmmmm? :)
Everyone owes to themselves to go grab this FREE (yes, FREE) OS and try it
for themselves.
-John Higginbotham-
-limbo.netpath.net-
<This is a CP/M master for a Vector Graphics Vector 4 CP/M machine. Was
<the Vector 4 S-100 based btw anyone?
<
<Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar@sicon
Yes it was. One of my s100 boxen is a Vector MX (s100 crate only none of
the original boards). The MX was z80 powered byt the Vector 4 may
have been 8088(cpm-86 V1).
Allison
<> > 4 CP/M Version 1.0 Release 2. Does anyone know what it's for?
<>
<Hard sector agrees with my information also. But I have a note
<indicating that the Vector 4 was/is a CP/M-86 machine. Any other inputs
<
Don, I think your right.
The CP/M Version1.0 Release 2 could only be cpm-86 as CP/M-80 would ahve
been more likely 1.4 or 2.2.
Allison
Chance for smoeone to save some documentation, and perhaps a machine...
--
Hans B. Pufal : <mailto:hansp@digiweb.com>
Comprehensive Computer Catalogue : <http://www.digiweb.com/~hansp/ccc/>
_-_-__-___--_-____-_--_-_-____--_---_-_---_--__--_--_--____---_--_--__--_
At the risk of reviving at least two discussions better left dead, I
have dug out some more IBM documents.
I have a 4361 marketing leaflet - the 4361 was the entry level 370
system between the withdrawal of the 4341/4321 and the introduction of
the 9370. I have practically no technical info so it won't contribute
to the debate on power requirements, but it was a self contained,
air-cooled unit often described as looking like a chest freezer.
I also have the following pocket reference cards/books.
IBM System/34 Command and OCL Statements Reference Summary (9th edition,
April 1983), 170 pages
IBM System/34 COBOL Reference Summary (4th edition, January 1982), 90
pages
IBM System/34 Assembler Reference Summary (3rd edition, July 1979), 26
pages
IBM System/32 SCP Command Statement Reference Summary (6th edition, May
1980), 23 pages
It seems I have a second copy of the Command and OCL statements and
Cobol reference summaries. *** IF ONE OF YOU OUT THERE WITH A SYSTEM/34
NEEDS EITHER OF THESE I WILL SEND IT/THEM TO YOU *** I might also
photocopy the Assembler reference if you ask nicely.
If anyone out there has a System/32 I shall be so amazed I might even
send you my only copy of the reference card.
The instruction set of the System/34 looks CISC and 8-bit-ish, although
it handled 16 bit and (I think) 32 bit data. Typical speed seems to
have been 0.1 to 0.3 MIPS. Someone on this list some months ago
described it as "a room-sized 8088" which is probably about right,
performance-wise...
Philip.
[Power Consumption of 3090]
> Are these all water machines? There are some air-cooled versions that are
> probably reasonable.
All 3090 models are indeed water machines. The 3090 was IBM's large
mainframe of the late 1980s.
There were other 370-derived machines around at the time. In particular
there was the 4300 series, of which the 4361 and 4381 remained at that
time (I think if you tried to buy a 4321 or 4341 you got a 4361. The
price was the same, anyway.) I cannot remember whether these were air
or water cooled, but they were much less powerful than the 3090
>> These figures are not even for a minimum system - you have to add disk
>> drives and that awful 400Hz motor generator set - which can consume up
>> to 7kW in itself.
>
> Yes, the 400 Hz would be a problem, almost as much as a cooling system (if
> one went with a water machine - probably too big of a headache).
I wonder. I have never seen inside the PSU of any of these machines,
but it seems to me that the outputs are all going to be low voltage dc
at a few hundred amps - so conventional switching power supplies could
be contrived (tho' probably not purchased new if there are tens of kW
involved!) to replace the strange 400Hz thingies. And a little circuit
to provide a 400Hz heartbeat if the machine uses this at all...
>> So, as I said, a typical system based around, say, a model 200 might
>> consume 50kW, but even that needn't cripple you financially.
>
> No. Around me, electricity is not very cheap - 11 cents/kWh - but running
Much the same here.
> a 50kW computer is not a financial burden if done in moderation. What
> might be a burden is getting the service entrance of the house to a point
> where it could handle 50kW nicely.
Yes. Although the elctricity company may do a lot of the work free of
charge if they think you're going to use a lot of the stuff. (My
parents achieved this. They wanted to move the meter board, so the
electrician doing the wiring told the electricity company, they're going
to use so much electricity thy'll need 3-phase and there won't be room
in the existing location. Result: new 3-phase connection and new meter
board, all free of charge.)
> I suppose that is the good thing about RCS/RI - we are in a factory, and
> are looking to get real 3-phase installed!
Nice. I'm surprised you don't have this already if you're in a factory.
Here we have 240V (now officially 230V but I've not noticed any change)
single phase up to around 20kW peak demand, 415V 3 phase (now officially
400V, ditto) up to a megawatt or so, 11kV 3 phase above that. Some
factories have their own supply at 33kV or even higher.
Philip.