At 08:13 PM 6/10/98 -0500, you wrote:
>It's not even classic yet:
>
>GRID INTROS FIRST MS-DOS LAPTOP WITH BUILT-IN POINTER
>BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, U.S.A., 1990
>AUG 16 (NB)
> -- Grid Systems Corporation has introduced the GridCase 1550sx, the first
>PC-compatible lapto...
Well, that just means it won't be priced outragiouslt on ebay. 8^)
Definitely significant, though.
>a mouse. I hate mice, and hate track-balls and other stationary pointers
>only slightly less, but I *love* IBM's eraser head. Some people see this
I agree in theory, but disagree with your conclusion. (Can't stand the
eraser.)
>A mouse requires you to remove your hands from the keyboard and switch
[...]
>if I have to move a stupid pointer across the screen, the eraser head
>let's me keep most of my fingers on keys where they belong.
Yes, but so does a trackball or trackpad centered below the keyboard (which
is one of the main reasons I bought my current laptop.) Best of all, IMO
is the tootsie-roll from the Outbound.
Mostly, however, I stick to keyboard commands (my one complaint about the
MacOS -- you can't pull down menus and such from the keyboard). I strongly
feel that anything you want to do should be doable from the keyboard -- if
you're willing to remember how. (Example: in MS Word, there is a keyboard
command to set bold/underline/etc. If I used Word a lot, and used
bold/underline/etc a lot, I would remember it. Instead, for the few times
I do that, I don't mind using the mouse. On the other hand, I can do just
about anything in Eudora without using a mouse-thingie.)
I do use a trackball -- a Logitech Trackman Marble. It's comfortable,
accurate, and simply works great. The advantage of a trackball/other over
a mouse is that on a mouse, when you click, you are also moving (however
slight) the moving part. With a trackball, you can take your thumb
completely off the ball before clicking.
And I'll shut up now lest I get flames for mumbling off-topic too much.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 12:57 AM 6/11/98 +0000, you wrote:
>> nice servers for their time, with great cases.
>
>As for the rest.. smile when you say it, some of us still run IIx's and
>IIfx's. :-)
Sorry, what I meant was, at the time they came out, they were
top-of-the-line. Today, with the advances since, they are simply great
servers. (And, when I get the time to set it up, I fully intend to put one
to use as a server for the Macs in Rachel's classroom.)
>Seriously, though, there is an article on one of the MacTimes sites
>which argues for using an older system as a server. Basically, it
Also, if all you're doing is internet stuff, an older IIci or basic '486 is
just fine. But that sort of thing that got a lot of us on this list in the
first place.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Hej allesammen;
What's a 'bit slice'? Are they served with a twist of lemon?
I suppose a better way of asking that is how is a 'bit sliced' processor
or ALU differentiated from a 'normal' one?
ok
r.
At 10:26 PM 6/10/98 -0400, William Donzelli wrote:
>> Packard Bell: Today's headache, tomorrow's obscure collectible. Hey, you
>> never know: People might start collecting only the badly designed systems.
>> It could happen.
>
>OK, enough Packard-Bell bashing. Send me every PB model 250 you can get
>your hands on - I will even pay shipping (and for the crate).
Heh heh. I thought that comment would flush out a PB person or two. :)
They have actually gotten alot better, but I don't think you'll ever see
any in the Smithsonian like some classic systems.
-
- john higginbotham ____________________________
- webmaster www.pntprinting.com -
- limbo limbo.netpath.net -
Mac XTs where the first as far as I know Mac clones.............
bascailly a Mac in a IBM 5150 case.........
Desie
-----Original Message-----
From: nerdware(a)laidbak.com <nerdware(a)laidbak.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, June 08, 1998 1:47
Subject: Re: Early Mac Clones
Date sent: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 13:46:25 -0400
Send reply to: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
From: Ward Donald Griffiths III <gram(a)cnct.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Early Mac Clones
> Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
> > I think that's the same book I've got a copy of around here.
Interesting
> > reading, but I've basically never seen any of that stuff anywhere.
Though
> > I found it really interesting, has anyone ever seen a Mac Plus or
simular
> > system recased into a PC case? It would be a fun project, but I've got
to
> > many other projects :^)
> >
> > The closest I've got to a Mac clone (I'm writting this on a PowerMac
> > 8500/180) is a Amiga 3000 with emulation software. The Amiga is
actually
> > about as fast as the real thing.
>
> I had a coworker in the late 80s who had his Mac and his Amiga 2000
> recased and rack-mounted, sharing a rack with a lot of _serious_
> video editing gear.
> --
IIRC, NewTek (makers of the Video Toaster) decided that since they were
having some trouble getting the Toaster accepted in the mainstream because
most people thought the Amiga was only a toy, they created an interface card
for a Mac that would allow the Mac user to run the Toaster-equipped A2000
(private-labeled for NewTek) from his Mac, thereby making it 'legit'.
I had to laugh at the thought of paying a grand or more just to see the
Amiga
Workbench come up on a Mac screen instead of the "toy" Amiga screen. Of
course, this 'toy' made multimedia possible before Uncle Bill said it was ok
to
use it.....too many people forget that. Not you guys, though. (I hope.)
One of my other favorite Amiga stories was something I swear I read in
AmigaWorld or Byte -- right after the A1000 came out, Gates had a press
conference to talk about Windows. Some reporter asked him about
multitasking, and Gates replied that multitasking really wasn't possible in
anything under 8 megs of ram. To which the same reporter replied, "But
doesn't
your own Amiga Basic multitask nicely on a 512k Amiga?"
A question which Gates promptly ignored and moved on.........
Paul Braun
NerdWare -- The History of the PC and the Nerds who brought it to you.
nerdware(a)laidbak.com
www.laidbak.com/nerdware
In general, file systems seem to fit into several simple categories.
Let's say UNIX-like, DOS-like, simple (just data), and that's about it
I've looked at Apple manuals, and the Apple ][ format is kinda like
DOS in terms of having an array of blocks and stuff. Except Apple's
is quite a bit more elegant. Since some people here are fond of
praising the VAX, how does its file system work (typically)?
>
>That used to be one of my interview questions for Unix programmers:
your
>buggy program just created a filename with {control characters, leading
>dash (-), leading slash (/), '*', etc} in it. How do you delete it?
>
>Does anybody collect file systems? That would be semi-useful for
somebody
>doing data recovery. I have no idea what the Newton "soup", for
example,
>looks like. One of my favorites was the Regulus (unix-like)
filesystem.
>It maintained a bitmap of free blocks and could easily allocate a
best-fit
>contiguous region for your file (I think they had an option to creat()
for
>contiguity). This made file access *fast* when you needed it. I still
>find fragmentation a nightmare even on Linux.
>
>-- Doug
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
IF you mean the AC adaptor, you can use later ones (powerbook). This
is actually beneficial because later ones are strong enough to power the
machine alone, while the Mac Portable one needed the battery to be
inside and working. I powered my mac portable for a few months w/two
adaptors. The I put the battery in. Happily, it recharged fully from
that high current (it was dead otherwise; I got the portable because it
wouldn't start up because of the battery. I got it to run by hooking the
battery up to mains AC long enough to "recharge" it).
>I was wondering if anyone had a Mac Portable power supply, and wanted
to
>sell it cheap.
> Thanks :),
> Mike Sheflin
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
How do UNIX files work? Is there a header of some sort?
BTW, I think it's an incredible pain that the Mac has no built in
way to change file types. If they get lost, I have to used DiskEdit
or some such thing to restore them.
>
>Even the Mac or its apps seemed to be confused about the nature of
>what should be in the resource fork - some apps stored all their
>data there, using it as a sort of mini-database of tagged chunks
>of data. If there's anything classic about today's computers,
>it's the nearly universal recognition that a file's a file.
>Departures from this are interesting but rare.
>
>The other non-file info such as the filename itself, the date stamp,
>attributes, etc. are treated in an incidental fashion. The Amiga
>file system, for example, had a "file comment" of about 80 characters
>of extra text to describe the file that wasn't always preserved.
>This may have been inherited from Tripos.
>
>And then there's the way something like the effects of Radix-50
>(packing three chars into two bytes) has percolated through the
>years as three-character filename extensions from RT-11 (or
>earlier?) to CP/M to DOS and Windows, which are overused and
>abused in many ways.
>
>One of my latest three-great-ideas-before-breakfast ideas is
>to write a program for Windows that sniffs and identifies files
>in the manner of Unix's "file". That's the problem with files as
>files: you can easily lose track of what's in them, especially
>if you lose that three-char extension, or it gets wrapped in
>an archive format or attachment, etc.
>
>- John
>Jefferson Computer Museum <http://www.threedee.com/jcm>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Before we go any further, which Packard Bells are we talking about?
I don't know the old ones (I rescued a 286 PB still in the box from a
compactor about a year ago and hid it where I thought it would be
safe; I doubt they will ever get that ceramic off the dumpster's ram),
but the new ones are ugly and had that stupid navigator thing that
looked like screenshots from Myst (do they still?). But, how bad
can a design get (am I asking for it?)?
>You mean there's a difference? :)
>
>Packard Bell: Today's headache, tomorrow's obscure collectible. Hey,
you
>never know: People might start collecting only the badly designed
systems.
>It could happen.
>
>
>-
>- john higginbotham ____________________________
>- webmaster www.pntprinting.com -
>- limbo limbo.netpath.net -
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I was wondering if anyone had a Mac Portable power supply, and wanted to
sell it cheap.
Thanks :),
Mike Sheflin
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Bit slice processors are designed so that they can be ganged together with
suitable interconnection, making an 8 bit ALU out of 2 - 4 bit units, etc.
Generally good for accumulators etc with more complex instruction decoding
outboard.
My 2 cents...
Kevin
At 02:39 PM 11/06/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>Hej allesammen;
>
>What's a 'bit slice'? Are they served with a twist of lemon?
>
>I suppose a better way of asking that is how is a 'bit sliced' processor
>or ALU differentiated from a 'normal' one?
>
>ok
>r.
>
>
>
On Jun 11, 3:36, Doug Yowza wrote:
> That used to be one of my interview questions for Unix programmers: your
> buggy program just created a filename with {control characters, leading
> dash (-), leading slash (/), '*', etc} in it. How do you delete it?
Quickest general method is "rm -i *", though you may sometimes need
"rm -i .*" instead/as well.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Guys:
I would address this to Ward directly, rather than to the list, but
our jerked-around mail system now removes the original senders
address. My apologies.
Ward:
Please e-mail me at: jeff.kaneko(a)ifrsys.com
There's something I'd like to discuss with you.
Thanks!
Jeff
We now return you to our regularly scheduled programme . . . .
At 12:47 AM 6/11/98 +0100, you wrote:
>That makes me wonder if they're going to attempt to rewrite history
>_again_... After all the Altair (it was the Altair, wasn't it) was hardly
Well, possibly, but the optimist in me says that maybe, just maybe, they'll
do it right, what with all that money they have laying around.... (Pardon
me, while I go kill said optimist. Feel free to continue laughing...)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 11:18 PM 6/10/98 +0000, you wrote:
>> >Dash '030 from (iirc) 68000 systems. It's an actual Mac II-type
>
>Apparently very popular (at one time, at least) with prepress houses.
Yes; one of mine came from a company called Landor Associates that was
responsible for recent Olympic Logos, Radio Shack's latest logo, Most (if
not all) of McDonald's packaging and branding, and a lot of Microsoft's
packaging/branding.
Great company, and good at what they do. (In addition to the Dash, they
had an outbound running around, but I don't know what happened to it.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 02:48 PM 6/10/98 PDT, you wrote:
>Is this device better than a mouse, in your opinion? Is it an ADB
>device?
Is it better than a mouse? Is Ben & Jerry's Phish Food better than a
rotten banana? Is a Jaguar XK8 better than totalled Ford Aspire? Yes,
it's better.
Unfortunately, it's an integral part of the Outbound case, and therefore
not applicable to any other computer.
The outbound, if you're unfamiliar with it, is a Mac Clone laptop. There
are two models; mine sports a 68030, and uses a standard 2.5" IDE laptop
hard drive. Great machine. (If my screen wasn't ferschimmled I'd be using
it all the time.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 02:48 PM 6/10/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Actually, the ad was for auctions at Haggle Online, http://www.haggle.com.
(nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more, say no more...) 8^)
For them not familiar with it, Haggle is kinda like ebay, though less
crowded. More importantly, it is also building an online museum of classic
computers. This is probably due to our own Doug Salot somehow being
involved in the whole mess...
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 01:37 PM 6/10/98 EDT, you wrote:
>This is NOT a flame, but i'm just wondering the point of posting items that
>have been put up for sale on ebay, et al. all that means is every item will
The point is that you thereby inform a whole passel of people that the
items are for sale, including many who might not otherwise know. Gets the
seller potentially higher prices. And, someone here might find out about
something they really want. On the other hand, it may annoy some folks
here.
btw, it seems to me that prices on Haggle are not quite as wild as on ebay.
(Though I do check ebay regularly too.)
>is announced as being for sale, the subscribers to this group should get
>first crack.
Well, tyhat would be nice, but the collective "we" can't force anyone to do
anything. This has come up before, and the consensus seems to be that it's
a tough decision whether to offer things here (and be a hero) or on ebay
(and get rich.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 08:26 PM 6/10/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Or the $1500 Lisa 2? That one went from $300 to $1500 in one bid, but it
>only takes one sucker, err, collector.
The auction sites are just like any other web site: you don't
know what's really happening, such as if the transaction actually
takes place at that price. Certainly the auction sites do not
list their failure and debt-collection rates.
I think the auction offers and supposed final bids are interesting
to hear - they're at least as interesting as the brag-of-the-week
>from those lucky Silicon Valley and Redmond thrift-store cruisers
who appear to be filling a U-Haul for $50 every weekend.
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Ward Donald Griffiths III wrote:
> Hell, I'd rather fix rams with my teeth the way the old Basque herders
> used to than a Packard-Bell computer.
At least us sheep ranchers understand your jokes.
- John
But there's a difference between a Z-80 running a text-mode interface,
and an 8088 running a GUI. Also, remember that Bill Gates didn't know
very much about operating systems, as opposed to languages. MS Windows
is the only OS MS programmed ground up, something they only started
after the A1000. And, I've never seen Windows multitask under 8MB in the
way the Amiga or a UNIXoid computer can.
>> and Gates replied that multitasking really wasn't possible in
>> anything under 8 megs of ram. To which the same reporter replied,
>>"But
>> doesn't
>> your own Amiga Basic multitask nicely on a 512k Amiga?"
>>
>> A question which Gates promptly ignored and moved on.........
>
>Especially since the TRS-80 Model 16, with the Xenix OS partly done
>by Microsoft, multitasked (and multiusered) quite nicely even with
>only 256K of RAM. Not to mention the Color Computer running OS-9 in
>64K.
>--
>Ward Griffiths
>They say that politics makes strange bedfellows.
>Of course, the main reason they cuddle up is to screw somebody else.
> Michael Flynn, _Rogue Star_
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
At 10:13 PM 6/10/98 -0400, Ward Donald Griffiths III wrote:
>Hell, I'd rather fix rams with my teeth the way the old Basque herders
>used to than a Packard-Bell computer.
You mean there's a difference? :)
Packard Bell: Today's headache, tomorrow's obscure collectible. Hey, you
never know: People might start collecting only the badly designed systems.
It could happen.
-
- john higginbotham ____________________________
- webmaster www.pntprinting.com -
- limbo limbo.netpath.net -
On Jun 11, 4:20, Ward Donald Griffiths III wrote:
> Unix started with a 14-char filename limit (and allowed [still does]
> characters in filenames tricky to get at from the shell).
I still have two disks with filenames which include DEL and NUL characters.
> I always figured if you couldn't describe
> what a file was for in 14 characters, you should be in a different
> profession. The current fashion for doing things like including
> things like extended version numbers in filenames does not change my
> opinion.
Nor mine :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Ok you DEC-heads. What baud rate does the Digital DF02 modem jog along
at?
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 06/07/98]
Hi. I just got a shwrink wrapped copy of this, and wanted to know if anyone
wanted it before I used it...
I'll either sell it or trade it for PC/Apple ][ stuff.
Ciao,
Tim D. Hotze
At 07:14 AM 6/10/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Does "Mac II-type motherboard" mean its a genuine Apple motherboard, or
>do you just mean its similiar to the Mac II motherboards?
Sorry... By "Mac II-type" I meant that size mb. Both that I have use real
Apple motherboards. One is (iirc) a Mac IIx, the other is a IIfx. Very
nice servers for their time, with great cases.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
On Jun 10, 11:10, Allison J Parent wrote:
> <word. I do not know if ODS-1 (RSX FILES-11) or the RSTS filesystems
> <precede RT-11, but if I had to guess, I would say yes. IIRC, both use
> <9.3.
>
> Did you mean 8.3? RT-11, RSTS and RSX-11 were 8.3 as was early VMS and
> unice.
RT-11 has always been 6.3, RSX-11 is 9.3 IIRC, and UNIX doesn't have any
fixed format - though early versions had a fairly small limit on name
length (12 chars?). All versions of UNIX allow as many dots as you can fit
in the length.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
@Get this for humor. The funny thing is, he'll probably get this price
for it!
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 06/07/98]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Shadow303(a)my-dejanews.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2.marketplace
Subject: FS: Apple Lisa Vintage Computer! Very rare!
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 14:39:20 GMT
Apple Lisa computer for sale! Looks a bit used but in excellent condition! Has
tons of extra software! I want 2,000 dollars or best offer. E mail me.
Cliff
--
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 06/07/98]
Hi. Just heard about this, so I dunno really what I'm talking about...
Appearantly, this company is (was) selling liscences for DOS 3.3. I'm
guessing that this is from a deal with MS. Has anyone ever seen this? Is
it available with another product, such as early Windows releases?
Ciao,
Tim D. Hotze
OK, to aviod confusion the first system in question is a SMS-1000, with a
PDP-11/73 board, 2MW RAM, RL02 Controller (DL), TK50 Controller (MU), Dilog
DQ606 Floppy Controller (DY). The SMS-1000 has an internal Floppy and HD,
which it thinks are a RD51 (DU) and RX50 (DU). The boot ROMs support DU
(DSA, the HD and Floppy), MU (TK50), and MS (TS).
I'm able to boot off of RL02 by entering in the bootstrap from ODT.
I've got RSX-11M and XXDP RL02 packs, and can boot from either. I've
managed to make a bootable XXDP floppy diskette. I can boot the machine
directly off of the XXDP floppy on power up. I can boot the XXDP floppy
>from the XXDP RL02 pack, and then boot the XXDP RL02 pack from floppy.
However, if I power up and boot from floppy, I can not boot the XXDP RL02
pack. Is this because the Boot ROMs don't support RL02's?
Does anyone have any instructions for a Dilog DQ606 controller? I gather
that it can be configured to act as several different floppy drives. The
drives that came with it are labeled as being a RX-50 and a RX-33, yet
RSX-11M sees both as RX-02's. I'd like to get these changed back to RX-50
and RX-33.
What does the device name 'MS', device type 'TS' stand for? My guess is a
9-Track tape drive.
I've also got a PDP-11/44 that I'm slowly working on restoring. It's in
two racks, one has a pair of RL02's which have been cleaned up. The other
has the CPU, 2 RX-02's, 2 TU-58's, and a battery backup. In looking at the
CPU, it looks as if it has a LED for the battery backup. Does that battery
need to be in the system? I would just as soon remove them and not have
anything to do with them since they are old lead-acid batteries, and I'm
not very fond of such things (spent 3 1/2 years of my time in the Navy
working on UPS's). Is there any reason that I can't just plug the whole
thing into a power source outside of the rack. I'm asking since for all I
know the battery and powersuppy in the bottom of the rack are some kind of
power conditioning circuit.
Also does anyone have any recommendations on how to go about testing out
the power supplies on the 11/44? I'd just as soon not blow anything up. I
have powered up the RL02's, but that is all so far. I'm waiting to test
the power supplies before I get the remaining boards that I need for the
system.
Thanks,
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
| For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |
Hey, not to mention those guys that unpackage their CoCo III's and put them
into PeeCee cabinets to add SCSI, more disk drives, extra memory, etc. etc.
etc.
Jeff
At 05:45 PM 6/8/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>bit hard getting a mac into a pc case though, remember that macs have all
>>the connectors on board,
>>
>>desie
>
>
>Can't be any worse than the people that put Atari's or Amiga's in a PC
>case. I've seen a Atari TT030 in a PC Tower, and it's quite popular among
>Amiga people to tower their A1200's. All it takes is some creative cabling.
>
> Zane
>| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
>| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
>| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
>+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
>| For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
>| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
>| For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. |
>| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |
>
>
>
I'm trying my darndest not to get too involved in this thread, even though
I started it, but I need to set the record straight: The URLs I sent
weren't from ebay, they were from Haggle Online. An online auction that is
totally free to buyers and sellers, unlike ebay, that charges a fee to
sellers. Not that it really matters, since online auctions seem to be the
new "great satan" on this list. I would like to point out though that if
you don't know the true value of an item, why not let the public decide?
What's wrong with making a little bit of money off a hobby? I know this
probably isn't over, but I'll try to stay out of it, regardless.
At 07:15 PM 6/10/98 -0700, Sam Ismail wrote:
>I and others have said in the past that there's no wrong reason for
>wanting to collect computers, but this craze I see going on at eBay is in
>the very least stupid.
-
- john higginbotham ____________________________
- webmaster www.pntprinting.com -
- limbo limbo.netpath.net -
<One of the smallest multitasking systems I've seen was the I/O processor
<on the PERQ 2's. It was a Z80 with 4K ROM and 16K RAM, but said ROM
<contained essentially a cooperatively multitasking kernel. Some tasks
<were in ROM, others were loaded into RAM. OK, so the user never realised
<what was going on, but that doesn't alter the fact that it was there :-)
The smallest I've seen run on 8080 and fits in some 100 or so bytes. It
was published in Kilobaud April 1978 page 102 and yes it was real.
To multitask on most anything all you need is an interrupt and save the
context of the current task and start some new task... the order, where
the tasks are and memory allocation can be somewhat tricky but, for
small tasks its pretty trivial. I've done it in 8048 MCUs where the
resources were 64byts of ram and 1k of rom and the tasks were keyscan,
display, serial IO and code conversion. The timer provided the
interrupt.
Allison
bit hard getting a mac into a pc case though, remember that macs have all
the connectors on board,
desie
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)wco.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, June 08, 1998 5:41
Subject: Re: Early Mac Clones
>On Sun, 7 Jun 1998, Tom Owad wrote:
>
>> What edition do you have? My 2nd edition book says a listing of clones
>> is given in edition 1, as oppose to just saying they exist. I'd love to
>> get a list of old Mac clones.
>
>I made a timely find today of the first edition of _Build Your Own
>Macintosh and Save a Bundle_. In Chapter 2 it has a price comparison
>between the clone "Cat" Mac and the real Mac. The computers it lists are:
>
>Cat Mac SE
>Cat Mac SE 30
>Cat Mac II
>Cat Mac IIfx
>Cat Mac IIcx
>Cat Mac IIci
>
>It will indeed be interesting if I ever find one of these homebrew clones
>(For the curious, the book basically tells you to buy Mac motherboards and
>parts from third-party suppliers and stick them in a PC case. That's it.)
>They would be hard to spot since I don't even give a first look to PC
>clone boxes. There's not really anything special about them anyway, other
>than the fact that it is novel.
>
>Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>Ever onward.
>
> September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
> [Last web page update: 05/30/98]
>
>> The MC68010 is the heart of my favorite computer ever, the AT&T Unix PC
>> (built by Convergent Technologies). I've got three, two work fine, one
>> is for parts. _Still_ the prettiest machines in my collection.
Do you mean the NCR Tower series? Or was this some other offering by
AT&T? I seem to remember that the old Tower 400's had 68010's - I've
still got a few boards somewhere for one (system board was about 1 metre
long and half a metre high!). I've got a complete Tower 700 with a 68030
as main CPU, and performance still rates really highly even these
days...)
Jules
On Jun 10, 14:56, Max Eskin wrote:
> How do UNIX files work? Is there a header of some sort?
Not really. Certainly not consistently across all file types. Often
command scripts have a comment at the top, and some versions of unix (eg,
Irix) embed a "tag" number into executables so they can distinguish
individual programs/versions quickly, but other than that, filetype
determination is done by looking at various parts of a file and comparing
what's found ("magic numbers") to a database (the "magic" file).
So, for example, my system "knows" a certain file is a command script
because the first 256 characters are all ASCII (which means it's probably a
text file of some sort) and the file permissions are set such that it's
executable (not merely readable).
It also knows that a certain file is an ELF-format executable for a 32-bit
little-endian MIPS processor with a version 1 architecture (ie it will run
on *old* MIPS cpus as well as newer ones) because the bytes at offset 1 are
"ELF", at offset 4 there's a binary "1" (which in this context means 32-bit
not 64-bit), at offset 5 there's another "1" (little-endian), at offset 16
"2" means "executable", and at offset 18 "0" means "MIPS" (not Sparc,
80x86, 68000, etc).
Some magic numbers are much simpler to decode, of course: a file that
begins with "GIF89a" is a GIF file, surprise, surprise. And the more you
dig, the more detail you can work out.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
<And another point. There are a lot of ways to make (say) an oscillator.
<If you're designing something you probably only need to know a couple of
<them. But if you're repairing it, you'd better understand the one that
<was used.
True! I have the advantage that I see designs and immediatly see the
core of the design with all the fluff removed. But it's years of
experience and a good basic grounding in circuit theory that allows me to
look st stuff I've never seen and synthsize the elements of the design in
my head and troubleshoot it, right down to seeing it's weak points of
likely failure.
Allison
<Related to this, there's a myth that design is difficult, but
design is easy, it's a process. The initial creative thought is hard.
<faultfinding/repair can be done by almost anybody. Well, having done
<both, I personally find them equally difficult. Perhaps that means I'm
<no good at it, but...
Troubleshooting is a very complex process that I've never been able to
teach to anyone but those that naturally could. For me troubleshooting
is something that I find natural and easy. I carry that to design as
just a different problem to solve (cheaper, faster, better; pick any two).
But working with field circus underscored that thinking is not something
you can mandate.
Allison
At 07:58 PM 6/10/98 -0500, Doug Yowza wrote:
>auctions. I'd suggest that the exact opposite is true. Whenever somebody
>asks this list "how much is this thing worth", the answer is invariably
>"whatever somebody is willing to pay". Basically, valuation of
>collectibles is a democratic process not an analytical one belonging to
>some exclusive domain of experts.
Exactly, hence the value of an auction environment. That is what "whatever
someone is willing to pay" means, isn't it?
-
- john higginbotham ____________________________
- webmaster www.pntprinting.com -
- limbo limbo.netpath.net -
Thanks for the advice -- it worked just fine!. Now...Windows (3.1) setup hangs when loading...when it's still in the DOS screens (before starting the Windows part.) Any ideas?
manney(a)lrbcg.com
"Un sot trouve toujours un plus sot qui l'admire."
>Most (all?) GRiDs allow the boot device to be selected by holding down a
>key at boot time:
>'F': floppy
>'H': hard disk
>'B': bubble disk
>'R': ROM disk
>etc.
I'm also hav
manney(a)lrbcg.com
"Un sot trouve toujours un plus sot qui l'admire."
This is NOT a flame, but i'm just wondering the point of posting items that
have been put up for sale on ebay, et al. all that means is every item will
already be overbid on for an insane price. it is my opinion that if anything
is announced as being for sale, the subscribers to this group should get first
crack.
david
In a message dated 98-06-10 13:21:21 EDT, you write:
<< Some items on auction:
Apple Portable, currently at $53.00
http://www.haggle.com/cgi/getitem.cgi?id=201635376
TI-99/4A, complete with about 15 games
http://www.haggle.com/cgi/getitem.cgi?id=201639758
Also, looking for cheap Type I PCMCIA/JEIDA RAM cards. 1mb-4mb range. >>
Well, apparently we need to demolish the existing one-story building where
the current museum is located, and it's always been a bit cramped for big
school tours, so a new larger location was pretty much de rigeur. I don't
know if anything will be added, and no, I'm not on the museum staff.
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Yowza [mailto:yowza@yowza.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 1998 6:17 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: Ack, not again (RE: Cross listing auction items)
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Kai Kaltenbach wrote:
> Please stop this, we've been over it a million times.
We've been over the "is it OK to sell stuff here" question a million
times. The auction thing adds a nice twist because they address the
all-important valuation issue.
Anyway, did you have anything to do with the Microsoft Museum
announcement, and do you know what Bill is looking for and how much he'll
pay?
-- Doug
Please stop this, we've been over it a million times.
It ALWAYS generates MORE traffic on the list to argue about it than it does
to simply ignore the auction posts if you don't like 'em.
Kai
At 12:58 AM 6/10/98 -0500, you wrote:
>The first DOS laptop with a pointing device was the GRiD 1550SX, and it
>had an isopoint (tootsie-roll) similar to the Outbound Mac-clone.
What year did the 1550sx come out? I'll have to watch for it... 8^)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
> On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Zane H. Healy wrote:
>
> > Was this one of the ones from about '92? If it's the one I'm thinking of,
> > it would be the first with the 'pencil' pointer in the keyboard. For all I
> > know, the first built in pointer (I'd not seen any prior to this). Of
> > course I really remember it running AIX and OS/2 at the same time (I hate
> > AIX, but sure wish they had released that product).
>
> That must be it. The TP700 was the first with the TrackPoint (eraser
> head).
Interestingly enough there was a thread recently on comp.sys.ibm.ps2 re the
collectiveity of PS2 s. Most mentioned the 700. Some quotes :
"The Thinkpad 710T (IBMs first Trackpad). I have one - without the 5MB
TP-File. There were two different model-lines out: one has a 2.5" IDE HD,
the other has a 5,10 or 20MB PCMCIA Solid State disk. The SSD-models have a
different planar and cannot be converted into IDE-models. I have a
SSD-model (2523-AY9) but no TP-Filecard. Too bad."
" 9552 Thinkpad 700 C, one of the last microchannel Thinkpads"
ciao larry
>
> The first DOS laptop with a pointing device was the GRiD 1550SX, and it
> had an isopoint (tootsie-roll) similar to the Outbound Mac-clone.
>
> -- Doug
>
>
>
lwalker(a)interlog.com
At 10:28 PM 6/9/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Was this one of the ones from about '92? If it's the one I'm thinking of,
>it would be the first with the 'pencil' pointer in the keyboard. For all I
>know, the first built in pointer (I'd not seen any prior to this). Of
That's probably it. Though not the first with a built-in pointer. As Doug
mentioned, GRiD had one, as did the Mac Portable (1989) and the Atari STacy
(year?). Not sure what year the Outbound came out but I'm pretty sure it
was pre-thinkpad (maybe '89ish?).
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Looks like I made a real splash with my first post since resubscribing! In
my defense, all I have to say is this: If don't really know the current
street value for an item and I want to get rid of it, the best thing to do
IS put it on auction and post to similar lists and newsgroups. I'm sorry if
I offended anyone. During my hiatus, I was spending alot of time on usenet,
a place where this is done all the time. Guess I got a little brainwashed.
If it's gonna cause a problem, I won't let it happen again.
At 01:37 PM 6/10/98 EDT, SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com wrote:
>This is NOT a flame, but i'm just wondering the point of posting items that
>have been put up for sale on ebay, et al. all that means is every item will
>already be overbid on for an insane price. it is my opinion that if anything
>is announced as being for sale, the subscribers to this group should get
first
>crack.
-
- john higginbotham ____________________________
- webmaster www.pntprinting.com -
- limbo limbo.netpath.net -
>A (very!) non-portable Mac "Clone" that I haven't seen mentioned yet is the
>Dash '030 from (iirc) 68000 systems. It's an actual Mac II-type
>motherboard in a huge server case. Ports were accessable on the top, and
>has about 6 or 7 drive bays up front. The front covers the drives and can
>be locked closed. Huge P/S, with filter on the back. Very serious
>systems. I've got two, actually.
Does "Mac II-type motherboard" mean its a genuine Apple motherboard, or
do you just mean its similiar to the Mac II motherboards?
Tom Owad
Is this device better than a mouse, in your opinion? Is it an ADB
device?
>At 12:25 PM 6/8/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>>Outbound
>>
>>Anybody have any of these? Any experience with them. I would love
some
>>further information.
>
>I have an Outbound. Fantastic machine. The pointing device alone is
worth
>getting the computer for. (Imagine a pencil tucked up against the
bottom
>edge of your keyboard. Roll it towards the screen and away to move the
>cursor up and down. Slide it left and right to move the cursor left
and
>right. Wonderful!) Unfortunately, mine has a problem with the screen;
if
>anyone has any spare parts, or knows anything about them, I'd love to
hear
>from you! (I'd really like to put this machine to use!)
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
O-
>
>Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
>roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen
know."
>Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
>San Francisco, California
http://www.sinasohn.com/
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
After reading Doug's message, I checked at my favorite trift store and
found a pile of manuals for a Wang PC. NOT Personal Computer but
Professional computer! The manuals seem to be sort of generic to all Wang
PCs. None of the manuals mentioned a model number of the computers
themselves but they did list the model numbers of the various options and
accessories.
I also found three Wang computers. They were under a pile of stuff so I
didn't get a good luck at them and I don't know if they were Wang PCs or a
different model but they looked like the PCs. Two looked like 8 slot
electronics units (that's what Wang calls them) and the other looked like a
5 slot unit.
Joe
At 02:18 PM 6/9/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>Greetings,
>
>I saw a very large Wang box at a thrift store yesterday, I *think* the
>little sticker on it said "PC-002". I didn't see the keyboard, but I
>didn't look.
>
>The machine was really big, I think about twice the height of an old
>IBM-PC and about the same width. It was longer than it was wide.
>
>It had two full-height 5.25" floppy drives.
>
>>From the back it looked like it had several large horizontally-mounted
>cards inside, including one with two coaxial cable connectors and another
>with two female DIN connectors.
>
>I would have paid close attention to it had my arms not already been full.
>
>I didn't see the keyboard, but it was probably stacked up in the pile with
>all the normal PC crap keyboards.
>
>If I am to go back for it, I'll have to take the car as I doubt I'd be
>able to survive the walk to the bus while trying to carry that thing.
>
>Does anyone know what this thing is?
>
>
>Doug Spence
>ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
>http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
>
>