I slight curiosity I've hit upon, and was wondering if anyone might have
the docs on this board at hand to help sort it out.
I've got a couple of Godbout 'Econorom' 2708 boards, which from the legend
and markings on the board seem to imply that it is intended to be used
with 2708 Eproms.
The oddity becomes, I've got one that is full of 2732 Eproms (it came that
way). And of course, if I've got the docs on it they are buried in the
warehouse somewhere... (sigh)
So, I'm wondering if this board is actually configurable for different
Eproms, and if so, does anyone have the specs at hand? (ideally, I'd like
to know how to configure it for 2716 Eproms)
Thanks!
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
I'm pretty sure I have those docs, let me check tonight. I know for sure I
have the docs for the CompuPro labeled one, which may or may not be a later
version.
I've been entering all my docs in a database the past few days, and I'm
about 2/3 done. Already at 350+! I'm finding all sorts of interesting
tidbits stuck into the binders, such as the original brochure for the IMSAI,
copies of Ohio Scientific's magazine/newsletter, etc.
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: James Willing [mailto:jimw@agora.rdrop.com]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 1998 9:23 AM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Info needed on Godbout Econorom 2708
I slight curiosity I've hit upon, and was wondering if anyone might have
the docs on this board at hand to help sort it out.
I've got a couple of Godbout 'Econorom' 2708 boards, which from the legend
and markings on the board seem to imply that it is intended to be used
with 2708 Eproms.
The oddity becomes, I've got one that is full of 2732 Eproms (it came that
way). And of course, if I've got the docs on it they are buried in the
warehouse somewhere... (sigh)
So, I'm wondering if this board is actually configurable for different
Eproms, and if so, does anyone have the specs at hand? (ideally, I'd like
to know how to configure it for 2716 Eproms)
Thanks!
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
< I've got a couple of Godbout 'Econorom' 2708 boards, which from the lege
< and markings on the board seem to imply that it is intended to be used
< with 2708 Eproms.
If it says Econorom and 2708 that is true.
< So, I'm wondering if this board is actually configurable for different
< Eproms, and if so, does anyone have the specs at hand? (ideally, I'd li
< to know how to configure it for 2716 Eproms)
It was not. That board was likely hacked for 2732 as the basic board was
2708 only. Fyi: the hack would be significant as 2708 was a three volage
part! Or it could simple be filled with 2732s for no good reason.
Allison
< >> By my faulty memory, the actual computer is about 2.5'W x 1'H x 2.5L
< >> Warning, they are HEAVY!
The PDP-8I was about that size and that was a year or two later than
the -9. The -9 has to be bigger.
< You sure about that?? We had a PDP-9 running some Radio station Automat
< equipment and the actual PDP unit was that one 'silver' box in the pictu
< Our other racks were the tape players and interface boards.
Everyone thought the 8I was 13" high(size of front pannel) but the
box/backplane was nearly three times that. Anyhow the size of front
pannels are often deceptive.
Allison
Servus,
back home, and back to the list.
Thanks to all for VCF 2.0. It was just fun. And Sam, maybe
you should offer another T-shirt next year for the 'day after':
I survived VCF 3.0
(but my wallet didn't survive the flea market)
:))
And the worst of all - my wish list is expanding: I've
seen some real neat things out there (Teachers PET,
SWTP 6800, Black Apple ][, Timex Coco's ...), and of
coure now I need any material from / for 'The Digital
Group' computers (Hi Chuck). And, And, And ...
--------------------
And now something of topic:
I need some help for_actual_ SUN HW. We have (want) to
order a Desktop unit, but I have no idea, so I need
independent info (not form a sales man trying to sell
his leftovers). If anyone is into the matter, pls.
send me an e-mail for further info. I would apreciate
any help.
Servus
Hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Please send me info about how to remove addresses from your list serve. I need to remove to addresses OTHER that the one that this mail is being sent from.
Daniel:
I would be willing to help!
William R. Buckley
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel A. Seagraves <DSEAGRAV(a)toad.xkl.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 01, 1998 12:01 PM
Subject: KL-10 Emulation Underway
>This message was supposed to have gotten here a while ago, but it never
did.
>Myself and a few other individuals are actively working on a KL-10
emulation.
>The project is named e10, and is 3.99% finished. I'm busy confusing myself
>with 36-bit math right now. Anyway, help would be nice to complete this
>fscker. It's being written in C for Unix platforms, it's under the GPL.
>Please don't email me and tell me how stupid this is, or how I'm never
>going to finish, I'm trying my damndest to maintain the Never-Give-Up
>attitude. I plan to be winning by Y2K. Anyway, does anyone want to help
out?
>
>I generated a web page (Using vi, of course...) at bony.umtec.com, and
>the current source can be had from there via FTP in /pub/ka10/*.
>Any help at all would be appreciated.
>-------
Yup, I bought 10 decks. I'm taking them to a conference too see if I can
generate some clever lads into a new card game or two...
--Chuck
(Who only ever found Bridge to be an interesting card game)
At 09:15 PM 10/4/98 -0700, you wrote:
>On Sun, 4 Oct 1998, Doug Yowza wrote:
>
>> If it was on the same table as the Digital Group Z80, then that was Hal
>> Layer's table (although it was Chuck McManis' Z80).
>
>I still don't know what computer we are talking about.
>
>Did anyone actual check out Hal's Z-Byte cards? I think they are
>incredibly clever.
>
>Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>Ever onward.
>
> Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>
The discussions of Xeroxing and de-acidifying are interesting, but
I'd like to hear any experiences of preserving documents by
electronic means - scanning, OCRing, and tools for doing that,
problems encountered, workable means of viewing and reprinting, etc.
The guys at <http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~itda/frames.html> have
made an admirable effort. They've converted a number of documents
to Adobe PDF format. They're waiting on permission from DEC
to post some old docs - wasn't there a mention on this list recently
>from someone who received permission to redistribute old docs?
- John
Appearing quite stylish at work this week in my 'Geek' t-shirt from the
VCF, someone approached with a somewhat unexpected question:
"So, what does 'Geek' mean anyway?"
Ummmm.... (nervous pause)...
G enuinely
E nthuastic
E lectronics
K eeper
(best I could come up with on short notice)
Any other 'takes' on a definition for this? (word rather than concept)
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
< Didn't Motorola make a 1-bit cmos microcomputer? Cannot remember it's pa
< number. I remember Turning machine articles in various places. One is "T
Yes the 14500 industrial control unit. It did not do serial arithmetic
but did do logical operation based on two single bit operands. It was
intended to be a controller to replace simple relay trees.
That however, is far different from systems that were bit serial as that
was done to reduce the number of redundant logic elements needed (at the
expense of speed) and often these serial machines had very long
instruction and data words with 31bits not unheard of.
Allison
Hi Tim and all,
At 04:51 PM 10/3/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Why not go for a bit-serial (aka 1-bit) CPU? It's an extremely classic
>design, and is certainly the way to go to minimize total transistor
>count.
Didn't Motorola make a 1-bit cmos microcomputer? Cannot remember it's part
number. I remember Turning machine articles in various places. One is "The
Armchair Universe" by A.K. Dewdney. It is a collection of "Computer
Recreations from the pages of Scientific American Magazine".
>
>>I've got some plans of designing a computer this year. I'll probably
>>get my feet wet with a simple 4-bit design, but I'd like to do a 12-bit
>>computer (since my "inspiration" is a PDP-8).
>
>The PDP-8/S is a -8 done in a bit-serial implementation. 78 microseconds
>for some instructions!
>
>If you don't mind making about a 15-year advance in the electronics
>you'll be using, you might also seriously consider making a CPU via the
>state machine route, using an EPROM and some counters. All math and logic
>operations can very easily be done via table look-up in the EPROM. This
>is a rather common assignment in lower-level computer engineering courses,
>as it's something that can be easily wire-wrapped in an afternoon or two,
>and it is extremely easy to try new microcode revisions.
Do you recommend any texts that did a neat state machine computer with a EPROM?
This sounds like fun, but would like to see some examples of what people
actually did first to help start a design.
-Dave
>
>--
> Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
> Trailing Edge Technology Voice: 301-767-5917
> 7328 Bradley Blvd Fax: 301-767-5927
> Bethesda, MD, USA 20817
>
>
Here are the questions & answers that were used in Nerd Trivia Challenge
at the VCF this year.
The three contestants did a very good job of answering 90%+ of the
questions correctly. The final question had the answer displayed along
with it by accident, so we had to choose the second one, which none of the
contestants got.
Also, one of the questions here has an incorrect answer which one of the
contestants (Kip Crosby of the Computer History Association of California)
corrected on the spot. I forgot which one that was. Sorry.
Otherwise, every question and answer was researched thoroughly, and the
Nerd Trivia Challenge committee did a great job of coming up with a good
mix of questions. The intent was to come up with challenging questions
that would also serve to educate the audience on computer history.
Think you have what it takes to win at next year's VCF? Start boning up
on your computer history and come on out and give it a try!
Note: NERD in Round 1 and SUPER NERD in Round 2 designate a wagering
question (i.e. like Jeopardy and Double Jeopardy).
Round 1
COMPUTING PIONEERS
These two guys started their company
in a Silicon Valley garage too, but
way before Jobs & Wozniak.
William Hewlett and David Packard
started Hewlett-Packard in 1938 at
367 Addison Avenue in Palo Alto,
California
--
Before their operating system became
the de facto standard for the PC,
these two early pioneers of micro-
computer software founded Traf-O-Data.
Paul Allen and Bill Gates
--
He wrote the technical manual for
the Intel 4004 processor. His
publishing company was later merged
with McGraw Hill.
Adam Osborne
--
NERD
Two of the three engineers who are
credited with the invention of the
transistor.
Dr. John Bardeen, Dr. Walter Brattain,
and Dr. William Shockley
--
Which German is now recognized as
having invented the first stored
program computer in 1937.
Konrad Zuse
-----
PORTABLE COMPUTING
Although not the first to market a
portable IBM PC compatible computer,
this company is best known for it.
Compaq
--
This portable computer, while not the
first notebook, was very popular among
members of the press.
Tandy Model 100
--
The only portable computer ever sold
by Commodore International.
The Commodore SX-64
--
This relatively unknown portable
computer, which integrated the display,
keyboard and storage unit into one
luggable case, beat the widely regarded
"first" portable by almost 5 years.
THINK!
IBM 5100, released 1975, included a
CRT, tape drive, and featured BASIC and
APL interpreters
--
This computer is regarded as the first
notebook computer.
Epson HX-20, released November 1981
-----
ACRONYMS
The "TRS" in TRS-80 stands for this.
Tandy-Radio Shack
--
Xerox PARC is not a place where you go
to have picnics, but actually stands
for this.
Palo Alto Research Center
--
The Sun company name is derived from
this college acronym.
Stanford University Network
--
What does the PDP in PDP-8 and PDP-11
stand for?
Programmed Data Processor
--
What the "KIM" of the MOS Technologies
KIM-1 single board computer stands
for.
"Keyboard Input Monitor"
-----
LANGUAGES COMPUTERS SPEAK
This language is named after a great
16th century philosopher and
mathematician.
Pascal
--
Dr. Grace Murray Hopper was involved
in the development of this still widely
utilized business programming language.
COBOL
--
The cursor in this graphically
oriented language was replaced
by a "turtle".
LOGO
--
This language is stack based. Its name
does not designate what order it came
in.
FORTH
--
APL stands simply for this.
A Programming Language
-----
COMPUTERS IN THE MOVIES
What computer system did the character
David Lightman use in the movie
War Games?
IMSAI 8080
--
What palm-top computer did John Conner
in Terminator 2 use to hack the bank's
ATM and then later the Skynet door
locks?
Atari Portfolio
--
What computer did Flynn use to hack
into Encom in the movie Tron?
An Apple ///
--
The computer that was used to render
the graphics in The Last Star Fighter.
Cray 1
--
The computer that was used to render
the graphics in Tron.
PDP-10
-----
Round 2
KILLER APPS
Dan Bricklin and Bob Frankson invented
this killer app.
VisiCalc, released December 1979
--
It usurped VisiCalc's grip on the
spreadsheet market by riding on the
success of the IBM PC.
Lotus 123
--
This was the first in Infocom's long
line of text-based adventure games.
Zork
--
This popular program by Broderbund
allowed you to print your own greeting
cards, posters and banners.
Print Shop
--
SUPER NERD
Broderbund means this in Norwegian.
"Brother bond" (the company was founded
by two brothers, Doug and Gary
Carlston).
-----
OLD IRON
The computer game "Space War" was first
programmed on this old iron.
DEC PDP-1
--
When it was introduced in 1976, this
legendary supercomputer was the fastest
computer the world had ever seen.
Cray 1
--
The first English computer to implement
the stored program concept.
The EDSAC, completed in 1949
[Note from Sam: This was the one. The correct answer was, um, er, uh,
"BABY" in Manchester...right? :) ]
--
After their involvement on the ENIAC
project, J. Presper Eckert and John
Mauchly went on to build this early
dinosaur of computing.
UNIVAC, 1951
--
This system developed by IBM and
derived from the SAGE project was used
by the airline industry to handle
reservations.
SABRE (Semi-Automatic Business-Related
Environment), developed for American
Airlines
-----
HISTORICAL UNIX
Korn, Bourne and C are all versions of
this.
Unix command shells
--
Bill Joy authored this (in)famous Unix
text editor.
vi
--
These two programmers developed Unix
on a PDP-7.
Dan Thompson and David Ritchie
--
What does the "BSD" in the BSD flavor
of Unix stand for?
Berkeley Software Distribution
--
This was the first computer not
manufactured by DEC that Unix was
ported to.
Interdata 8/32
-----
OPERATING SYSTEMS
This was the first computer to feature
a graphical user interface.
The Xerox Alto, created in 1973 at the
Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, or
PARC.
--
Before being acquired and modified by
Microsoft for the then nascent IBM PC
in 1980, MS-DOS was formerly known as
this.
QDOS (Quick and Dirty Operating System)
by Seatle Computer Products.
Also 86-DOS and SCP DOS
--
Multiplexing Information and Computing
Service is better known as this early
operating system.
Multics
--
The policy of this operating system was
"No advertising, no support, no bug
fixes, payment in advance".
Unix
--
The first microprocessor-based computer
to run Unix.
The Z8000-based Onyx C8002 in 1980
-----
NERDPOURRI
This first mass-marketed kit computer
was named after the planet the crew of
the starship Enterprise were visiting
in that week's episode of Star Trek.
Altair 8800
--
Apple's GUI-based predecessor to the
Mac. While advanced for its time, it
was extremely expensive, costing
upwards of $10,000.
Apple Lisa, released in 1982
--
Of the Apple ][, the Commdore PET and
the TRS-80 Model 1, the computer which
was not exhibited at the first West
Coast Computer Faire.
TRS-80 Model 1, introduced in August
of 1977
--
This computer measured 12" wide by 12"
high by 12" deep and was all black,
except for the multi-colored logo.
NeXT
--
SUPER NERD
The year and month the IBM PC was first
introduced.
August 1981
-----
FINAL QUESTION (voided due to technical foul-up :)
COMPUTER INNOVATIONS
Originally invented by IBM as a way to transfer microcode updates, this
medium can be either hard-sectored or soft-sectored.
Floppy disk
-
FINAL QUESTION (actual)
SERIAL NUMBERS
It was the serial number of the first Apple ][ off the assembly line.
2001
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 09/21/98]
< But neither the 11/10 nor the /34 nor the /44 were, by any stretch
< of the imagination, "microcomputers". Definitely minis.
Since you put it that way true, but I see that as marginally significant
as they are still PDP-11.
Sorta like running OS8 on a 6100... Smaller CMOS and still a PDP-8 for all
intents.
What would be the first NON-PDP-11 micro to run unix? that would be
significant as it's a truly distinct port.
Allison
< Actually, there is some value in experimenting with strange CPU
< architectures, parallel machines, reconfigurable hardware, etc. Not
< everything has been done before.
Sometimes things that have been done before can be done more cleverly
or economically making it worth doing again.
< > No, I'm not. How many people are there in Boston who do this stuff?
< > 5? That's not much information. And a web site inspires no one.
More likely 100 times that. First off you have all those nutty MIT
students. The those like me and I've met a few people that are in the
running the last few months.
Web site that provice inforation, tools, tricks abound and are not to
inspire but to assist. Inspiration is is an internal event.
< dispute this. It's a lot easier to get information now than it was 10
< years ago. I've had to try to convince a semiconductor company that they
< should send me a data sheet on a microprocessor. Now I just grab it off
Information was always available, just had to get off ones bottom and go
look. I was in the local library and picked up three books on VAX
archetecture and left another few behind regarding VMS. Books on
electronics and circuits easily filled 20 linear feet of shelves. All
free.
Allison
>>In fact, when I was a student at WPI in the mid-70's, we had a version
>>of Unix running on an 11/10 in the CS department (off RK05s)...
>
>But neither the 11/10 nor the /34 nor the /44 were, by any stretch
>of the imagination, "microcomputers". Definitely minis.
Sorry, I was actually responding to the 11/34 vs. 11/44, since they
were later computers than the 11/05,10... I wasn't responding to the
question of the first microcomputer. I should have made that clear...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
D
David:
I am short on time now, and much of what you have is not known to me,
so I can not now be of much help. I will try later.
Still, I would be interested in the CDC equipment you mention.
Where are you located, etc. I am in Southern California.
William R. Buckley
-----Original Message-----
From: SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com <SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, September 24, 1998 11:16 AM
Subject: new DEC additions
>drove out to the country the other day and picked up this load of dec
stuff.
>some of you dec hotshots can tell me if it was worth the trip. lol
>
>i already have a microvax II, but in a tower unit form factor, almost like
a
>pc. (ba123 i think) the 3 i got are shaped different. two of them are big,
>probably over 200lbs each easy. the first one has a sticker on it showing
>model 63006. its a big unit, with a hood that opens up top and a big tape
>drive <?> that slides forward. the machine says TS05 on the front. one
model
>came with two hard drives. the other unit 'named pugsly' is the same,
except
>it has a small tape drive and the backplane has cables going everywhere and
>the side panels are off. thankfully they have wheels. the 3rd uvax is a
much
>smaller unit but wider than the one i have here in the computer room. it
has a
>dual vertical floppy drive and two hard drives.
>i also got two vt220 terminals
>about 40 orange binders about vax/vms. programmer's guide, reference, and
who
>know what else!
>a letterwriter 100
>external drive RD54
>a tape drive (tk50?)
>a rat's nest of cables to hook everything up.
>some blank dec 5.25 disks
>about 20 compactapes. half are backups. last bu was nov94.
>also got these system tapes:
>microvms 4.6 full bin
>vax fortran 4.5 bin
>decnet mvms v4 net bnd/n
>tsv05 driver bin
>microvms v4.7 bin
>vhs lic key bin
>microvms 4.6 bin mand update
>mvII diag cust
>rel:1.2.1 install microvax II (handwritten)
>
>
>heh, if anyone can explain all this, that would be most welcome. it was
hard
>work having to unload those off a truck by myself. i might keep the smaller
of
>the 3 i got, but the two big monstors, i'm unsure of. the people i got
these
>from also want to give me a CDC machine that's even bigger...
>
>david
>>< I believe the first microcomputer to run Unix was the DEC PDP11/03 and
>>< 11/23 at At&T's Bell Labs (see the papers on mini-unix).
>>
>>I believe that is wrong. Unix was running on PDP-11s long before the
>>LSI-11 or the 11/23 by many years. I think the 34, and 44s were teh
>>popular hosts.
>In fact, when I was a student at WPI in the mid-70's, we had a version
>of Unix running on an 11/10 in the CS department (off RK05s)...
But neither the 11/10 nor the /34 nor the /44 were, by any stretch
of the imagination, "microcomputers". Definitely minis.
Tim.
>< I believe the first microcomputer to run Unix was the DEC PDP11/03 and
>< 11/23 at At&T's Bell Labs (see the papers on mini-unix).
>
>I believe that is wrong. Unix was running on PDP-11s long before the
>LSI-11 or the 11/23 by many years. I think the 34, and 44s were teh
>popular hosts.
In fact, when I was a student at WPI in the mid-70's, we had a version
of Unix running on an 11/10 in the CS department (off RK05s)...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
On Oct 4, 22:05, Tony Duell wrote:
> Subject: Gemini Galaxy 2
> I am sure this thing is over 10 years old... I am also almost certain
> that only UK people will have heard of this machine.
>
> I am currently repairing a UK Z-80 machine called a Gemini Galaxy 2. It's
> basically a much-enhanced NASCOM, and uses the same bus pinout but with 3
> more address lines (there's some RAM on the CPU board to handle memory
> mapping).
>
> I have 3 boards in the cardcage - the CPU (Z80 + 64K RAM + boot ROM), an
> IVT (a video card with a Z80 on it) and a floppy controller/SASI
> interface. The latter is linked to a single floppy drive and to a Xebec
> SASI->MFM interface. And that, in turn is linked to a Rodime hard disk.
>
> At the moment, those boards seem to be working. It powers up and asks for
> a boot disk. Which I don't have. Alas the hard disk is not working - it
> starts to spin up and then spins down, and stops with the LED flashing (I
> can get the exact sequence of flashes if anyone has the error code
table).
A common fault on Rodime drives was losing the index sensor output, which
it uses to check the speed as it spins up. I've never found a way of
fixing that completely, since it's a Hall Effect sensor inside the spindle
motor. It generates two pulses per revolution, and the micro uses a
special data pattern on track -2 to decide which is the real index pulse
(it only needs it for formatting, really).
At power-up, the micro checks the RAM and ROM, and then starts the motor
and looks for index pulses. If it sees some, it then checks the speed --
there's a PLL that compares the sensor output to the reference clock
(11MHz, divided down to 120Hz). If the micro doesn't see the index pulses,
it generates "Fault 10" and shuts the system down.
The manual for my RO350 notes that there is one jumper near the
microprocessor which can be removed to circumvent the problem caused by
loss of the special index info on track -2. You could try removing it, if
you have an RO350 or similar.
The two LEDs are for Power and Select; the Power LED flashes for fault
codes. A long flash = 1, short flash = 0.
1 no index track data pattern
2 no flag 0,0 (didn't find Trk0 after 350 steps)
3 motor speed outside 1% (one!) tolerance at end of power-up sequence
4 motor speed outside 10% (ten!) tolerance in normal operation
5 flag zero stays true
6 not used
7 static Write Fault
8 RAM self test failed
9 ROM self test failed
10 no index
11 motor not up to speed
I don't know if these codes are the same on other Rodime drives.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
[LINK]
______________________________________________________________________
Sunday October 4
Gates pushes hometown to Linux
Linux-based document system costs 10% of Windows NT solution
By Christine Burns - FRAMINGHAM
It's ironic that in his zeal to equip his new $US53 million home with
the latest and greatest technology - not to mention every modern
convenience known to man, woman and child - Microsoft mogul Bill Gates
drove his hometown into the arms of another operating system.
The official paperwork filed with the city clerk in Medina,
Washington, (pop. 3,082) concerning the Gates homestead had the city's
file cabinets bursting at the seams. Of the 10 file cabinets housed in
the old ferry terminal-turned-town hall set on the shores of Lake
Washington, four were completely filled with upward of 40,000 pages of
building permits, blueprints and change work orders all pertaining to
the Gates estate.
Factoring in future growth and recognising that they physically had no
more room for storing municipal paperwork, the town fathers had to
decide on whether to spring for a new town hall or a document
management system. The latter being the more prudent choice, the town
looked into NT document management systems that might fit in nicely
with the town's Microsoft LAN. But what the town came up with was a
product that runs on Caldera's version of Linux. This product rang in
at less than 10% of the price of its NT counterparts, says Ray Jones,
president of Archive Retrieval, a Kirkland, Washington, systems
integrator. Archive Retrieval last month built and installed the
city's new document management system, called The Archive.
"When I asked the guys at town hall if they minded that the idle
screen would display a big Caldera logo, they told me I could point it
toward the window so everybody walking by could see it," Jones says.
Sorry, Bill. No hometown advantage here.
Back for more News
_________________________________________________________________
@IDG Home | News Wire | @PC World | Industry Directory | Industry
Events | PR Wire | About IDG | About Our Site | Help |
(c) Copyright, IDG Communications Ltd, 1998. All rights reserved.
>
>>
In the 1950's, this stuff was new. Now, it's all for fun. I agree it
must be a lot of fun, but there's no scientific/practical value.
>Yes, but was there a 'point' to building a CPU from relays in the
1950's
>? Other than the fun of doing it, of course.
>
Companies can make more money otherwise. If a kid buys $300 worth of
parts and shares all of his homebrew apps with friends ala GPL, no
one makes any money. If a kid buys $2000 worth of plastic and then
keeps on buying $50 apps, it's a lot of money! It didn't happen like
this on purpose, by the way. When stuff started to get bundled and
kids started to play around with the computers their parent bought
them...
>Yes, but why not? Some of us would like to reverse that trend.
>
No, I'm not. How many people are there in Boston who do this stuff?
5? That's not much information. And a web site inspires no one.
>Are you kidding? The web is full of sites with data sheets and
>application notes. Just about every major (and many not-so-major) IC
>manufacturer is there. When I started out you had to phone the
>distributors and convince them to send you a data sheet. This wasn't
>always easy if they realised you were a hobbyist who would probably buy
a
>couple of chips at most.
>
>>
>> I'm curious why the HPCC would be interested in homebrew? Or is HPCC
>
>Well, it used a calculator, right..... Why should any computer club be
>interested in homebrew. This project started as a replacement for the
>much-missed HP-IL interface on the HP71 and sort of grew...
>
>-tony
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Heads up all you homebrew hackers!
Next year we'd like to help revive the homebrew ethic by featuring YOUR
homebrew projects in the exhibit section of the VCF. There will be awards
presented for best homebrew project in different categories. Get out
those soldering irons!
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 09/21/98]
>< Take a look at the PICs as well. The programmer for those is very simple
>< and Microchip do document the programming algorithms. A 16C84 programmer
>< is 2 cheap TTL chips, a few discretes and a PC printer port.
>I've looked at them and like most single chips MCUs they are bizzare.
>They also offer a windows emulator that pretty neat.
>Allison
What you find "bizarre" is almost certainly what I like about them. 12-,
13-, and 14-bit wide instruction words, Harvard architecture so that
I-space and D-space are completely different concepts, remarkabably
efficient interrupt handling, remarkably low-power quiet modes,
etc. A refreshing change from the bland uniformity of the
8080/8086/6800-derived microcomputers that dominate much of the world.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology Voice: 301-767-5917
7328 Bradley Blvd Fax: 301-767-5927
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817
Eric:
This is just the kind of restoration that interests me. Also, I noted that
in another
message, you refered to a PDP-10 simulator, the kx10. Where can I get a
copy
of the simulator? If you have information about the availability of
hardware, I
would very much like to receive same.
William R. Buckley
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, September 21, 1998 10:38 PM
Subject: PDP-10 (was Re: EDSAC on your desk.)
>Huw Davies <H.Davies(a)latrobe.edu.au> wrote:
>> It's just that there are so many circuits in a -10 that getting one to
run
>> (even when new) required a full time field service engineer
>
>As I recall, the 2060 I used to use ran for months at a time without
needing
>repair (i.e., just scheduled PM).
>
>> (our -10 was delivered in 1973 so if it were still here it'd be 25 years
>> old)
>
>Must have been a KI, then. I'm told that those were relatively easy to
keep
>running (at least compared to the KL).
>
>> I'd expect the probability of it running would be close to zero. The
>> maintenance fiche is about a foot deep....
>
>A former DEC field service engineer has told me that I'm a madman for
wanting
>to try, but he didn't put the probability anywhere near that low. The
>system was in perfect working order when it was decommissioned, and not
>much has happened to it since. Aside from testing the power supplies and
>checking for oxidation on the connectors, I'm not really expecting that
>much to be wrong with it. And I think I know where to find spare modules
>if it is necessary.
>
>Cheers,
>Eric
>
On Sat, 3 Oct 1998 Zane H. Healy wrote:
>>Anyway, the URL given was http://www.jshoenfeld.com/eindex.html
>
>I just tried and got told there was no DNS entry.
Hmmm, looks like there was a misprint in the magazine I copied that URL from.
On Sat, 3 Oct 1998 Lawrence Walker wrote:
> beyond 720k. Many of the old ST Format 'zine's free disks used to be
> formatted with extra sectors so that they could cram more PD on disks. There
Same applies to some Amiga coverdisks from the Amiga User International mag;
these used the diskspare.device 12-sectors-per-track format.
> When I get a Workbench disk for my newly acquired Amiga 2000 I'm going to
> see if FCpro will copy the Amiga 880k format. Would be a solution to transfer
> problems from the net. Now if I could only find an easy way around the
If you have an Amiga with a workable amount of RAM or a hard disk, it is quite
easy to transfer files using PC-formatted (720K) floppy disks.
Contact me privately if you want a copy of the Workbench disk etc., or more
info on 1541-to-Amiga connection.
>> You can make a cable to hook up a 1541 disk drive to a PC or Amiga and read
>> files or disk images using this.
>
> I take it you're referring to the X1541 cable. I wasn't aware that it could
> be used with Amigas. That looks promising.
I wasn't. Perhaps I should have written "you can make cables..." instead.
I only have experience with this on an Amiga, but there are at least two types
of cable you can make, one extremely simple the other using a 7406 IC.
There are several Amiga programs for reading C64 disks, the Easy1541 package
being the nicest. You can read and write 1541 files and disk images, send
commands (e.g. to format a disk) and using the supplied iec.library control any
IEC bus device.
-- Mark
< What you find "bizarre" is almost certainly what I like about them. 12-
< 13-, and 14-bit wide instruction words, Harvard architecture so that
< I-space and D-space are completely different concepts, remarkabably
Check some of the 4bitters done over 18 years ago... nothing new to me.
< etc. A refreshing change from the bland uniformity of the
< 8080/8086/6800-derived microcomputers that dominate much of the world.
Everything is a refreshing change from wintel. ;)
Allison
Jamie:
Would you please enlighten me as to how you came into possesion of
the Xerox. Also, I wonder if this computer has any relationship with the
Xerox Sigma series of processors. Can you obtain serial numbers, etc?
William R. Buckley
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamie Bixby <jbixby(a)labwest.northatlantic.nf.ca>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, October 01, 1998 4:45 PM
Subject: Xerox 16/8
>I have recently came into position of an old Xerox computer that I
>really do not know much about and was wondering if anyone out there
>would be able to send me via e-mail any info that they may have on it.
>The computer works and all but all that comes up is something about
>tables and something about invalid drives. If anyone out there has any
>info on this computer I would greatly appreciate it.
>
Joe:
I learned APL as my first language, at Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa
California (Orange county, in So Cal) in 1972. We had an IBM 370/155H at
the time, 1MB of RAM (as I understood it, the RAM was semiconductor), and
the version of APL was from STSC, called APL PLUS. What a step down to
then learn Cobol, Fortran, and RPG, though Assembly (ALC) was a lot of fun.
We have come a long way since then.
William R. Buckley
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, September 22, 1998 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: IBM 1130 Was: Re: Linux on S/370? Was: Re: printer socket (Off
topic)
>Chris,
>
> I learned to program in APL on one in 1968 or 1969. We didn't have to use
>punch cards, we were THE PROGRAMMERS, the machine was turned over to us
>when we walked in the door. At that time it was the only computer in
>central Florida. Not bad for a kid that was still in high school!
>
> Around 1979 I worked for a third party company in Virginia that
>maintained 1130s and also upgraded them with third party hardware. I well
>remember adding boxs with core memory made by someone else (not IBM and not
>us). I think it upgraded them to a whapping 32K! One of the 1130s that I
>upgraded was owned by Gallop in Princeton, NJ. They're the people that do
>the Gallop polls. Another one was owned by Virginia Military Institute in
>Lexington, Va.
>
> Those machines seem to last forever, I'll bet there's still some of them
>in use!
>
> Joe
>
>At 09:55 AM 9/22/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>At 22:33 21-09-98 +0000, Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net> wrote:
>>>At 09:35 PM 9/21/98 -0400, Christian Fandt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Ever hear much of an IBM 1130? Any info on the web, etc. on that
machine?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I learned to program on one. Many years later I worked on them.
>>
>>That's where my interest lies as this was my first exposure to computing.
>>In college I learned Fortran IV/66 in 1972/73. I've always been curious
>>about those machines since then. Never heard of them anymore over the past
>>25 (!!) years.
>>
>>At least I can tell stories to the youngsters, like other "old time"
>>computer folks here, about spending hours in the noisy keypunch room on an
>>IBM 026 (I think) keypunch machine punching out my programs onto the
>>Hollerith cards, hauling the stack of cards (without dropping the danged
>>things!) over to the Computer Operator Guru to be run together in a batch
>>with all the other students' Fortran and Cobol programs overnite and
coming
>>back the next morning to be greeted with several pages of compiler errors
>>typically generated by a very simple syntax error in the early part of my
>>program. No fancy-a** GUI there!! :-)
>>
>>That machine was "huge" by some standards then: it had 32K of core memory!
>>The technical faculty at this rather small junior college was quite
>>impressed.
>>
>>Ahhh, those were the days....
>>
>>Of course, I would LOVE to have one! Anybody got one laying around they
>>want to get shed of?? <g!>
>>
>>Have any technical/interesting facts or anecdotes about the 1130 to share
>>with us big iron folk Joe?
>>
>>Thanks, Chris
>>-- --
>>
>>
>>
>>Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
>>Jamestown, NY USA
>>Member of Antique Wireless Association
>> URL: http://www.ggw.org/freenet/a/awa/
>>
>
Christian:
I have been monitoring this group for some time now, and though I find the
microcomputer material not particularly interesting, there is much here to
be enjoyed. Thank you for pointing the way.
I remain interested in the PDP-11 you have.
William R. Buckley
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Fandt <cfandt(a)servtech.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, September 22, 1998 6:55 AM
Subject: IBM 1130 Was: Re: Linux on S/370? Was: Re: printer socket (Off
topic)
>At 22:33 21-09-98 +0000, Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net> wrote:
>>At 09:35 PM 9/21/98 -0400, Christian Fandt wrote:
>>>
>>>Ever hear much of an IBM 1130? Any info on the web, etc. on that machine?
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, I learned to program on one. Many years later I worked on them.
>
>That's where my interest lies as this was my first exposure to computing.
>In college I learned Fortran IV/66 in 1972/73. I've always been curious
>about those machines since then. Never heard of them anymore over the past
>25 (!!) years.
>
>At least I can tell stories to the youngsters, like other "old time"
>computer folks here, about spending hours in the noisy keypunch room on an
>IBM 026 (I think) keypunch machine punching out my programs onto the
>Hollerith cards, hauling the stack of cards (without dropping the danged
>things!) over to the Computer Operator Guru to be run together in a batch
>with all the other students' Fortran and Cobol programs overnite and coming
>back the next morning to be greeted with several pages of compiler errors
>typically generated by a very simple syntax error in the early part of my
>program. No fancy-a** GUI there!! :-)
>
>That machine was "huge" by some standards then: it had 32K of core memory!
>The technical faculty at this rather small junior college was quite
>impressed.
>
>Ahhh, those were the days....
>
>Of course, I would LOVE to have one! Anybody got one laying around they
>want to get shed of?? <g!>
>
>Have any technical/interesting facts or anecdotes about the 1130 to share
>with us big iron folk Joe?
>
>Thanks, Chris
>-- --
>
>
>
>Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
>Jamestown, NY USA
>Member of Antique Wireless Association
> URL: http://www.ggw.org/freenet/a/awa/
If it isn't one problem it's another. Last night I left the PDP-11/23+
(still haven't gotten it to work with a /73 CPU board) running for about 4
hours to see how it handled being left on. The only thing running was
"show mem" on the console since I was working on some other stuff.
Much to my terror/irritation, about 10pm I noticed a buzzing or sparking
sound. I quickly moved it away from the sofa, and started investigating.
It sounds as if something in the area where you've got the breaker and the
powercord plugs in is 'arcing and sparking'. I've got to take off in a
little while, but I plan on looking into this later this afternoon or
tonite.
Unfortunatly I don't have any docs on the BA123 (just the BA23), so will be
having a fun time figuring out how to get it apart.
Does this problem sound familiar to anyone, and does anyone have any
suggestions?
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
WICO Command Control (circa 1982)
WICO Trackball 72-4545
For use with:
Atari Home Video Game
Sears Arcade Game
Atari 400 and 800 Home Computers
Commodore VIC-20 Home Computer.
I have several of these available, and they're unused. They're built
like a tank. I was going to adapt them to other uses many moons ago,
but never got around to it. $10/each, $25/3. Plus shipping.
Or trade for DEC Rainbow, Pro-3xx, or PDP-11 stuff.
Dave Jenner
djenner(a)halcyon.com
I have some PDP-11 references up for grabs. These are all either
small paperback books from DEC, small pamphlets, or foldout reference
"cards." If you need any more specific information about any of these,
let me know.
- Microcomputer Interfaces Handbook, 1980 (quantity 1)
- Microcomputers and Memories, 1981 (1)
- RSX-11 Handbook, 1984-85 (1)
- RT-11 Pocket Guide, V04.00, 1980 (1)
- TECO Pocket Guide, 1978 (1)
- PDP-11 Programming Card, 1975 (3)
I'll give priority to anyone who has something to trade, but even
if you don't have anything, let me know what you'd like.
I'd like to find a "Mini-Reference to RT-11, V5.3" (or a complete
set of docs, of course!)
Dave Jenner
djenner(a)halcyon.com
>The "TRS" in TRS-80 stands for this.
>
>Tandy-Radio Shack
What does the "80" in TRS-80 stand for?
Tom
--
Sysop of Caesarville Online
Client software at: <http://home.earthlink.net/~tomowad/>
< In the process of doing so, of course, you'd end up building an S-100
< to {ISA|PCI} converter :-). These "modern" interface chips tend to
< assume that they're going straight into a PC-clone.
Been there done that and also wrote and article about subsetting ISA
to get a bus more usable on non isa machines.
A typical homebrew app would be grafting a WD1002WX to a z80 homebrew
to provide a MFM hardisk. The example is the core of home brewing as it
takes common cheap components to make a usable or improved system but is
not a plug in mod.
< And I think an S-100 Ethernet interface is substantially less weird
< than an S-100 ARCnet board, and I've had several of those!
Eithernet was done for S100 commercially. S100 took longer to die than
most people thought.
Allison
entertainment. But there is no real point in getting a high score, right
< Building a CPU should be like that. It's entertaining. It's a hobby. And
< for me, the feeling I get when it runs its first instruction almost
< certainly exceeds any feeling I would get from a video game (OK, so I
< don't like games much, but you get the point).
Not so fast... There are good reasons to design your own cpu. Assuming
your doing an existing cpu, speed and added features are some.
For example doing a FPGA version of z80 that runs at 30mhz and also uses
not more than 2-6 clocks per instruction. Tough you bet but, it would be
faster than any z80! Practical maybe not. but that was a trivial example.
Another could be a simple PDP-8 using modern parts and no core that can
easily run at several MIPs (8Es were several hundred thousand instructions
per second). Just some exercises. ;)
Allison
< Most Xilinx FPGAs can be configured by a serial bitstream from a
< microcontroller or a PC printer port. Not too hard to do, and a lot
< easier to modify than an EPROM.
I use EEproms... easier still. They can also take a serial bit stream
but in some apps the controller isn't operable until the FPGA is up.
< The problem with most of these devices is that the format of the
< bitstream is not documented (in fact some companies actively prevent it
< being documented) and that you have to use their expensive software
< (which often runs under an OS that I don't have...). However, take a loo
< at the Xilinx 6000 chips - they are 100% documented. It's possible to
< write your own compiler and downloader for these. They also look
< interesting devices...
Most the serial format is easy and a loader is not much but the compiler
is not trivial as you have to do route maps and that's not trivial.
< Take a look at the PICs as well. The programmer for those is very simple
< and Microchip do document the programming algorithms. A 16C84 programmer
< is 2 cheap TTL chips, a few discretes and a PC printer port.
I've looked at them and like most single chips MCUs they are bizzare.
They also offer a windows emulator that pretty neat.
Allison
< I believe the first microcomputer to run Unix was the DEC PDP11/03 and
< 11/23 at At&T's Bell Labs (see the papers on mini-unix).
I believe that is wrong. Unix was running on PDP-11s long before the
LSI-11 or the 11/23 by many years. I think the 34, and 44s were teh
popular hosts.
Allison
< > I doubt it. The homebrew/hobbyist movement had a very compelling driv
< > force: just about the only way to get your own computer was to built i
< > yourself. That's no longer true. But there is a pretty strong homebr
< > aircraft movement, and it also still makes sense for robotics.
< ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<
< Speaking as degreed Enginerd, a home-brewer from childhood, and a
< private pilot.... when one's homemade *computer* crashes, one is at
You called? Good description of me. ;)
< least spared the attention of the NTSB and the EyeWitness News Team...
You bet.
Allison
On Sat, 3 Oct 1998, Jim Strickland wrote:
> Ahh. I see. :) So if you took that same chip and built, say, an ethernet
> board for an s100 bus or something equally wierd, that would qualify?
In the process of doing so, of course, you'd end up building an S-100
to {ISA|PCI} converter :-). These "modern" interface chips tend to
assume that they're going straight into a PC-clone.
And I think an S-100 Ethernet interface is substantially less weird
than an S-100 ARCnet board, and I've had several of those!
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology Voice: 301-767-5917
7328 Bradley Blvd Fax: 301-767-5927
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817
Is there a device that would allow _any_ disk, independently of
format, including Apple ][ disks, to be read? I know Teledisk can do
this for all conventional formats, but not Apple disks. It would be
nice to connect one of these and read the disk image into a file.
The main reason why I ask is for rescuing messed up floppies...
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Doing something like a straight-8 is not trivial due to the shear number
of parts and interconnects needed. A ttl version is manageable.
The big thing is to experiment. I've considered doing a PDP-8E design
and each time I take out a fresh sheet of paper it ends up being a
16bit or even 24bit machine. a 24bit machine with the same format as
an 8 as some appeal.
<the past 20 years. It is true that some of today's tools of the trade
< for example, a good PAL/GAL programmer - are
< more expensive than many of tools of 1975. But in real dollars,
< today's $800 device programmer is much cheaper than, say, an 8080A
< CPU, which had a street price of US$250 or so in 1975.
There are Xilinx FPGAs (use an eprom for the pattern and it soft loads)
saving the expensive programmer. Or the Lattice ISP parts also using
minimally expensive interface cord (I think). Even if the parts cost
some the lack of programmer lowers the cost. The expense is the
software tools and the knowledge to write the VHDL/Xable code as
needed to define the parts function.
Check the TCJ web page for info about alta engienering for a cheap GAL
programmer.
There are parts like 8748/9 and 68705 that make programming pretty easy
and the programmer can be homebrew. Their advantage is that assemblers
can be had for free and the parts are cheap(or even salvaged).
There are lots of options.
Allison
HI Gary and all,
At 10:27 AM 10/3/98 -0700, you wrote:
>To start things, I'd like to offer that I'm in the process of recreating
>a copy of Edmund Berkeley's "Simon" computer designed and built by him
>in the 50's as a demonstration "show and tell" of how a "real" computer
>works. It's a collection of 100+ relays, two paper tape readers and
>some blinkey lights. Version 1 was a "two bit" computer with the
>ability to scale to 4 bits, while version 2 scaling to multiple precision
>using a real CARRY! It's a small machine - "almost" a "laptop". Right
>now I'm collecting parts - specifically looking for the two paper tape
>readers (solenoid operated - not motor driven - so if anyone out there
>has one or two of these...)
>
>For a reference to Simon, see the thirteen part series in Radio Electronics
>magazine (US publication) from October 1950 through October 1951.
>"Constructing Electronic Brains" by Edmund C. Berkeley and Robert A. Jensen.
>There was also a cover article in Scientific American around that time -
>sorry I don't have the issue handy with an overview of the project.
>
This sounds interesting. I will try to find the Radio Electronics articles
you mentioned. Can you describe the paper tape, was it 5 bits? Maybe
something else
could be used to simulate it, maybe a mechanical drum or a diode matrix =
rom if the number of bits isn't too large.
My first "computer" project was the game of "life" using TTL logic, for
example a 7490 decade counter to count the cell's neighbors as other
counters moved through the 8 neighbor's x, y addresses.
-Dave
Could someone please cc: me on the list files #539 to #546. I had another
run-in with installing Windows NT5 Beta, so I lost most of my C: drive,
including my e-mail files.
Thanks in advance!
Rich Cini/WUGNET
- ClubWin!/CW7
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
- Collector of "classic" computers
<========= reply separator ==========>
At 08:00 PM 10/3/98 -0500, Doug wrote:
>On Sat, 3 Oct 1998, Sam Ismail wrote:
>
>> We start a little movement, people fall in behind it, it grows, and BAM!,
>> homebrew is chic again!
>
>I doubt it. The homebrew/hobbyist movement had a very compelling driving
>force: just about the only way to get your own computer was to built it
>yourself. That's no longer true. But there is a pretty strong homebrew
>aircraft movement, and it also still makes sense for robotics.
Do remember however, to a large extent a 'robot' is just a computer on
wheels with some very unusual peripherals... B^}
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
I have a few questions:
1)
Does anyone have the voltage for the backlight on a Toshiba TLX-1342-G3B1
CGA LCD? It was pulled from a Tandy 1400HD laptop.
2)
Is there any way to connect a non-Apple monitor to the RGB port on an Apple
//c? It's a 15-pin connector, like a PC joystick/MIDI connector. Being a
15-pin connector, would a VGA monitor work with it? Or would it just need
to be a CGA, or would I just have to get an Apple monitor?
3)
I know it's pretty rare, but does anyone have an LCD panel for the //c?
ThAnX,
--
-Jason
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#-1730318