That's good, the Sphere works better unassembled :)
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: William Donzelli [mailto:william@ans.net]
My unbuilt Sphere-1 is getting donated to RCS/RI, with the understanding
that the boards will never see an iron.
I belong to the Mid-Atlantic Antique Radio Club which has established
the Radio History Society, a non-profit musuem, which is located at
George Washington University in Washington, D.C.
The Radio History Society http://www.radiohistory.org/ is an IRS
501(c)(3) organization which can provide donors with a tax deduction.
A single friend of mine has decided that he will donate much of his
collection to RHS when he passes on as nobody in his family is
interested in old radio.
Anyway, I'd imagine CHAC and other organizations can offer help in
directing people to good homes for their gear.
Marty
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Eventual fate of our machines
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 10/7/98 11:09 AM
Has there been any discussion about the eventual fate of our collections
after we are gone?
My wife and I have discussed this at some length. I see three phases to
my collection.
Phase one: Active procurement (Present state)
My collection currently exists in a very unorganized state in my
basement. I have no real inventory list.
Phase two: Active display
Fully inventoried with a list of what works and what doesn't.
We've discussed the possiblity of setting up some sort of cybercafe to
help pay for maintaining the collection.
Phase three: Finding the collection a new home (After I'm gone)
This is the tough one. In the wrong hands the collection might
just go to a landfill and that would be a real shame. I have no kids so
there is no one to carry on the tradition. I shudder to think about the
eventual fate of all of our collections. Do we need a national repository
for all of this stuff?
Thoughts to ponder,
George
=========================================================
George L. Rachor george(a)racsys.rt.rain.com
Beaverton, Oregon http://racsys.rt.rain.com
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Oct07.110957.1767.68258; Wed, 07 Oct 1998 11:10:00 -0400
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with SMTP
id IAA02277; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 08:07:26 -0700
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP
id IAA36360 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Wed, 7 Oct 1998
08:07:17 -0700
Received: from racsys.rt.rain.com (racsys.rt.rain.com [199.2.210.34])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.1+UW98.09) with ESMTP id IAA12
828
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 08:07:15 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.rdrop.com [127.0.0.1])
by racsys.rt.rain.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA24650
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 08:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from george(a)racsys.rt.rain.com)
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981007080210.24636A-100000(a)racsys.rt.rain.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 08:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: George Rachor <george(a)racsys.rt.rain.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Eventual fate of our machines
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.981007072916.6874A-100000(a)shell1.ncal.verio.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
< I meant, what was the proportion of each media at the time?
No idea, seems biased to tape where I lived (LI NY).
< Back in the days of my IMSAI experience, we had both an ASR-33 and
< a cassette interface card. I don't remember the relative costs,
< though. A cassette interface and deck were less costly than
< an ASR-33, even at ham radio prices?
1975-76 time frame a used ASR33 was 500-900$US. The only machines at the
ham meets were BAUDOT with 5level tape (and slower), they ran 75-150$US
for a good working one.
The ACR and a cassette tape were like 199$US and 35-45$US and faster as
well.
The third choice was an optical PTreader homebrew or commercial and they
required a parallel port (cheap or trivial build) and inexpensive.
Punching was again a cost thing and the old teletype BPRE punches were a
good find at 100-200$.
The point being things we take for granted as cheap or available now (or
during the 80s) were less common and expensive in the mid to late 70s.
Back in '76 showing up with some kind of terminal storage and more than
4-8k of ram and Basic generally put one in the fortunate class.
My altair by late '75 had a home made ascii keyboard attached to a
MITS-PIO and a modified (for 64char, 16line) SWTP CT1024 and a MITS
88-ACR and 12k of very flaky (solder plated edge connector rot) 88-S4k
ram. I was able to run MITS 4kbasic, 8kbasic and Programming package II.
That for its time was a power system.
A bit more history... the other systems seen at the time that were
pretty neat were the AMI EVK series (6800 SBC with decent amount of ram
and rom) and the SWTP 6800. I havent seen either one in years. Both
were pretty nice systems and less hardware intensive for the user. It
seemed to me at the time that the 6800 camp were doing more software work
and the 8080/s100 camp were into hardware.
Anyone remember the Viatron systems that were turning up surplus around
'75-78 time frame? It used tape and had a multichip LSI cpu.
Allison
< I would do that is I knew how. My memory board has several
< jumpers and a couple of 8-switch dip switches but I have no doc on
< the board so don't know memory settings. It is a 64K board so I
< would assume I have a full address space. It is a N* RAM board
< BTW.
Can't help on that no docs for that board.
< > Are they personalized for the machine and are all the port headers don
< > the mother board set up correctly? Are the media the correct density
< > the controller in use?
<
< Good question. These were sent to me by someone on the list.
< The disks are 10 sectored (hard) double sided double density. The
< controller is an N* Micro Disk Controller MDS-AD or that is all I can
< see on it.
The MDS-AD is a double density controller...ok there.
Now the disks can be formatted as 48tpi or 96 tpi as the controller will
support most 5.25 drives and if the drive is wrong...
Personalizing, if they were set up for different IO they may not work on
you NS*.
< Any other tips to help out?
Get docs! Your working blind without them.
Allison
OK, all of the stuff is now spoken for. I had to flip a few coins on some
of it, as there was demand for some of the things. Sorry to anyone that
lost the coin toss - I wish I had more.
I am still looking for those IBM 5103 ribbons.
William Donzelli
william(a)ans.net
< >How do you know it was paper tape... MITS basic that was "pirated" was
< >often supplied on MITS ACR format audio tape. Still have one!
<
< At the time, were ASR-33s or cassettes the more common media for exchang
Yes!
ASR33 was expensive so many people used terminals or VDM1/parallel port
keyboard or other combinations.
Also ASR33 was 10 cps and ACR was 300baud... considering the 4k basic was
a 8-9 minute load on the tty and about 3 on the ACR it should be obvious
tape was a better way to go.
Allison
< 4) 'The original' paper tape of BASIC that was pirated from Bill Gates.
How do you know it was paper tape... MITS basic that was "pirated" was
often supplied on MITS ACR format audio tape. Still have one!
Allison
Regarding Tron and the recollection of friend-of-a-friend-who-worked
there anecdotes, it reminds me of what's still happening in the
computer graphics business today: everyone wants to take credit
for what's on the screen.
For example, the company I work for, Viewpoint DataLabs
<http://www.viewpoint.com>, did the modelling for the recent
movies Godzilla and ANTZ. What does this mean?
It means our artists and 3D modelers created some of the data used
by some other company's animators. Of course, our PR people
trumpet the fact that Viewpoint made Godzilla. Well, we made
the computer model by digitizing and finesse-ing some big rubber
scale models made by someone else. And it goes on and on...
some other company does the animating, someone else does the
rendering, someone else does the compositing of real and fake
images, someone else produced it, someone else funded this or
that, someone else's 3D software was used to render it.
At Siggraph, the industry's big trade show, the Kingston memory chip
booth wasn't far from our booth, and they spent the week telling
people to buy their memory because it was used in the machines
that rendered scenes from Titanic.
Back to Tron, though - three-four years ago, I remember meeting
someone at a Siggraph who claimed to have worked on Tron, and who
still had a copy of the original computer 3D models. I think he was
a Caucasian wearing a robe and Sikh-like turban, but my memory
may be faulty. If the truth is ever documented, I'm sure Tron
was assembled using what equipment they could afford, and whatever
could get the job done to the satisfaction of those paying the bills.
- John
I have the drive but no adaptor and when i took mine apart, it appears to be
just a standard seagate mfm type drive, i think mine was an st-225.
In a message dated 10/6/98 11:00:22 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
fauradon(a)pclink.com writes:
> It's a Host adapter for the SIDER hard drive. I believ it is SCSI type. I
> have the manual and software if you ever get your hands on a sider Hard
> drive.
> Francois
You might be able to use any 10Mb (or so) external SCSI drive, I'm not sure
about that though.
I can get the connector pinout from mine, I haven't taken it apart yet so I
don't know what Hard drive it takes. I could chek if nobody else has the
answer ready.
Experts please?
Francois
-------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the desperately in need of update
Sanctuary at: http://www.pclink.com/fauradon
-----Original Message-----
From: David Williams <dlw(a)trailingedge.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, October 06, 1998 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: Unknown Apple II Card
Ok, guess I'll have to look for a SIDER if that's what this is. Wish
I'd know that when I was at the thrift where I picked it up.
Unfortunately they recently threw everything out and became a
$0.99 store. Shame because they still had a bunch of computer
stuff I wanted to pick up.
On 6 Oct 98, at 23:01, Francois wrote:
> It's a Host adapter for the SIDER hard drive. I believ it is SCSI type. I
> have the manual and software if you ever get your hands on a sider Hard
> drive. Francois
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
> - Panasonic JR-200 (I think this may exist)
Exists, I have one.
> - Sanyo PCH20/PHC25 (Z80, 4K/16K, $99/$199)
Exists (at least acording to some web sites.
> - STM Pied Piper (CP/M portable, 64K, $1295)
Never heared of.
> - TI 99/2 (Supposedly $100, including 4.2K RAM)
Never heared of.
> - TI CC-40 (Compact Computer 40, laptop like Epson HX-20, 4 AA cells, 31
> character LCD display, $249)
Exists - I miss it in my collection, but have seen several
> - Unisonic Futura 8300 (Z80, 2K, Sinclair BASIC, $90)
I have one, originaly boxed, althrough the box name is
different (Your Computer). But almost any Exemplar I
know has a different name.
> - Video Technology VZ200 (Z80, 4K, MS BASIC, $99)
I own two of them. They have been somewhat popular for
a very short time.
> By the way, has anyone actually seen an TI 99/4 (not 4a)?
Shure, have one, barebone :(
Gruss
H.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa. I have sinned. I am retireing after 10 yrs of reselling
computer, test and laboratory equipment. It was with interest and dismay that
I read the top 10 Holy Grails and the following threads. After ballooning up
to 16,000 sq. Ft of warehouse my partner insisted on scrapping large parts of
the inventory. I was an accumulator, he was a scrapper. Needless to say we
didn't last.
Unfortunitely during that time we destroyed a lot of older computers including
a Xerox Alto, I recognized it later on Revenge of the Nerds
several Xerox Stars, I have some of the factory software left and maybe a
mouse.
a Magnolia
Jaquard 100 Word Processor Used the 4004 computer chip
Unknown SBC with an 8008 chip, I saved the chip (Std bus I believe)
3 IBM 5100s
Scores of early Intel development systems including several Prompt-48 and
MCS-8, we bought large lots from Intel
Chameleon, I may have a manual or two.
Litton 1251, Dual drum memory 400K, punch tape programmed
PDP-8
Several Teraks
Cincinatti Millichron 2000, I may have a programming card left
I'm sure some of the big iron counts but I didn't know that field well.
OK so this is more than 10.
Where were you guys 4 years ago? I'm really sorry for my part.It is really
hard to figure out what is collectable, particularly if you don't recognize
it. I felt really bad when I finally recognized that that funny looking Drive
with Xerox on it.
Is there any interest in a DEC VAX 730, a General Automation Zebra 5500 (a
Pick machine), DEC RA60 & RA81s, Tektronix 4113, NCR 1000. These need to go
very soon.
I enjoy the list. Thanks a lot.
Paxton
I have gotten lots of requests for details on this system. So I am posting a
list of Chieftain systems and their board count that I have for sale. I am
open to all offers, of course I am looking for the best one. Please reply to
whoagiii(a)aol.com not to the list. I and the equipment are in Portland, Oregon.
Smoke Signal Broadcasting System
1) Chieftain with a wood top.
with 2 5 1/4" FHFD and the following boards
LMB-1A 9 slot Backplane with 8 slots IO
6809 CPU OS9-SCB69
CIMIX 64K Static Ram
M512X populated with 128K
2X M32-X 1 fully populated, the other 6 of 8 banks full
M16-X Fully populated
DCB 4A Drive Controller
4 2 port serial cards
2) Dual 8" DSDD with a wood top. Qumetrack 242s, attaches to #1
3) Chieftain with wood top
with a 5 1/4" FH MFM Hard Drive with an attached Omti 20C
Controller
LMB-1A 9 slot Backplane with 8 slots IO
CPU 50719, 68B09, OS9 SCB-69
M512X with 128K
2X CIMIX 64K Static Ram
M16-X Fully populated
M32-X Fully populated
HDA-P/STA-A/HDA-S
4X 2 port Serial Cards
It is interesting that the unit with the hard drive has no floppy. There is
wiring that leads me to believe that one power switch turned on all three
units at
the same time. This is cut now.
Paxton
I have gotten lots of requests for details on the systems. So I am posting a
list of Cromemco systems and boards that I have FS. I am open to all offers,
of course I am looking for the best one. Please reply to whoagiii(a)aol.com not
to the list. Portland, Oregon 97214 is home.
Cromemco
C 10 Computer with evternal 5 1/4" Floppy and Kbd
I think this system was the controller for the Computer
following
System 2
in a dual height wood cabinet 30"X24"X36" with a 5 1/4 FHFD
and the following cards :
UUX 68020 CPU wi 68881 - 16 mhz
64FDC
PRI
STDC
SFLSH
2 2048 MSU
MCU
SVID
SDMB
1024 KTD
SDCM
SDMA
The following software in 6 boxes of 5 1/4 disks containing
Fortran IV, Ptr., Com, WP, Proprint, Procall, backup and Data
and 68000 Fortran 77. Most of the disks are copies and not
originals.
The following Books
a Binder of Program data, Cromix-plus users manual, Intro to C+,
Baseline Graphics Inst., S Series Board Family Inst., SDD Camera
Digitizer Board Manual, SDCM Color Monitor Board Manual, C-%
Tech Reference, Cromix+ Programming, 68020 Cromix Admin.
This system may not be complete. The boards appear to be out of order
and the cables pulled off the cards. All of the cables may not be there.
System 3 with 2 8" 1/2 Ht Floppys and a 5 1/4" hard drive (I would have
to remove it to identify it) and the following cards
4X 256KZ Memory
DPU 68000/8
Octart
16FDC
WDI-II
System 1, CS-1H, 6/13/83, 8 Slot MF with the following cards
WDI-II
4X 256K Memory
DPU Z80 & 68000/8
Octart
16FDC
This Octart brake3out cable is homemade. It breaks out to 8 serial
connectors mounted on a wood board. One of the cables has
been damaged by it being ripped out of its plug.
Extra Cards and Parts, please bid each.
3X 64KZ-I
2X 256KTP
ZPU
ZCPU
SCC
64FDC
TU-ART
Quadart attached to a
IOP
Keyboard
All are untested. After reading the threads about starting old systems I
decided to sell them as-is untested.
Thank you,
Paxton
At 19:38 6/10/98 -0700, Uncle Roger <sinasohn(a)ricochet.net> wrote:
>At 08:24 PM 10/5/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>I've always wanted to know which machines have only a single instance
>>represented on this list.
>
>If I've got any that aren't duplicated, I'd guess them to be:
>
>NEC PC-8201 (not the PC-8201A)
[Snip]
What is the difference between the PC-8201 and the PC-8201A? I've got two
PC-8201As, and what *seems* to be an PC-8201. It's a different, bronze,
colour and has "NEC PC-8201" printed on the top left-hand corner. However,
the silver sticker on the bottom of the computer says it is a PC-8201A.
How can I tell for sure which I have?
Regards,
| Scott McLauchlan |E-Mail: scott(a)cts.canberra.edu.au |
| Network Services Team |Phone : +61 2 6201 5544 (Ext.5544)|
| Client Services Division |Post : University of Canberra, |
| University of Canberra, AUSTRALIA | ACT, 2601, AUSTRALIA. |
At 17:07 6/10/98 -0700, Kai Kaltenbach <kaikal(a)MICROSOFT.com> wrote:
>New computers announced at the 1983 CES:
>
>Vaporware? Please respond if you KNOW any of these exist for SURE.
>
[Snip]
>- Video Technology VZ200 (Z80, 4K, MS BASIC, $99)
Not only do these exist, they were very popular in Australia in the mid-80s.
They were marketed as the Dick Smith VZ-200 (Dick Smith is *the* major
electronics retailer in Australia). Not only that, but there was also a
VZ-300 (also known as the Video Technology Laser 310). For details, please
see the following URLs:
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~alexios/MACHINE-ROOM/Video,Technology_Laser_200.
html
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~alexios/MACHINE-ROOM/Dick,Smith,Electronics_VZ-2
00.html
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~alexios/MACHINE-ROOM/Dick,Smith,Electronics_VZ-3
00.html
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~alexios/MACHINE-ROOM/Video,Technology_Laser_310.
html
>By the way, has anyone actually seen an TI 99/4 (not 4a)?
Yes, I've got one, Unfortunatly I have no power supply for it. Not only
that, but I don't know what the power supply pinout is, nor where I could get
a plug to suit the strange power supply socket (it's just like the one for
the TI-99/4a, except one of the pins is bigger, so a TI-99/4a socket won't
fit).
For details on the TI-99/4, see http://99er.interspeed.net/994.html
Regards,
| Scott McLauchlan |E-Mail: scott(a)cts.canberra.edu.au |
| Network Services Team |Phone : +61 2 6201 5544 (Ext.5544)|
| Client Services Division |Post : University of Canberra, |
| University of Canberra, AUSTRALIA | ACT, 2601, AUSTRALIA. |
It's a Host adapter for the SIDER hard drive. I believ it is SCSI type. I
have the manual and software if you ever get your hands on a sider Hard
drive.
Francois
-------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the desperately in need of update
Sanctuary at: http://www.pclink.com/fauradon
-----Original Message-----
From: David Williams <dlw(a)trailingedge.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, October 06, 1998 6:40 PM
Subject: Unknown Apple II Card
I have an unknown interface card for the Apple ][. At least I think it
is for a II. It has a 50 pin connector down the front of the card.
"REV E" and "SCI Typ. 1A" dated "Jan 24 '85" printed on the card.
An EPROM with
8443EPP
AM2732ADC
Copyright 1983 AMD
printed on it. That's all I can find printed on the card. Any ideas?
For those who can handle images, there are a couple at:
http://www.trailingedge.com/~dlw/comp/images/acard1.jpghttp://www.trailingedge.com/~dlw/comp/images/acard2.jpg
Not the best pictures but I have the camera here right now and may
take some closeups of the board and chips.
Thanks.
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
< Nope, no manuals except a copy of the N* DOS manual and a
< monitor manual I believe. The system has a CPU board, disk
< controller and a 64K RAM board so I'd guess N*DOS should load
< fine. Opened it back up but don't see any DIPs near the back.
< There are a couple of switchs outside the case which are labeled
< for different baud rates for the video and printer port.
The dips are on the mother board at the rear of the machine inside.
They set up all of the IO charateristics including the sense of pins two
and three in the serial connectors.
I know of no Horizon that has switches for baud rates, that was a user
mod.
Allison
< Ok, I have a few minutes now to play around with the N* Horizon
< I've been fixing up. I've tried to power it up and it seems to hit the
< disk drive and then nothing. I've plugged some spare terminals into
< the port marked "Video Terminal Port" and played with baud rates
< and other comm settings but get nothing on any of my terminals.
There is no resident monitor or software other than a disk boot in
a standard horizon. It will not say anything to a terminal untill
it boots (assuming the booted code has something to say). If the boot
fails likley the only signals you get is disk activity or the lack of
it.
Make sure you have at least 32k of ram starting at 0000 for CPM or
16k starting at 2000h for NSdos.
< Also tried straight through and flipped comm cables. Can
< someone give me some info on these and maybe walk me through
< getting it set up and running so I can check and see if I've missed
< something? Oh, I'm trying both N*DOS 5.2 and N* CP/M 2.2.
Are they personalized for the machine and are all the port headers don on
the mother board set up correctly? Are the media the correct density for
the controller in use?
I have and still run one.
it occurs to me, if you have DOCS for it the setup and checkout procedure
is in there.
Allison
< >For example why is it that prople are hunting for MARK-8 and Kenbec's
< >when the most likely find (greatest quantity) for 8008 machines is a
< >MCS-8 from intel?!?!
<
< I disagree - an even *more* likely find is a 11/34a with an 8008
< running the front panel!
Tim,
That would be the case if I were looking for anything with an 8008.
I was thinking more of a SBC or Evaluation board when I wrote that.
Allison
< Also, I seem to recall that North Star DOS was generated for a specific
< size -- I believe it's top-resident. A DOS set up for 16K would work on
< or 48K, but not vice versa.
No it isn't. The controller fills the e800h to efffh space but NSdos
is ORGed for 2000h and up. CPM is top resident and for the NS* that
usually means a 58k maximum system unless there are some tricks appled.
Allison
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998 21:12:07 -0500 (CDT) Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com>
writes:
>On 7 Oct 1998, Eric Smith wrote:
>
>> > The Heathkit people have pretty much set a precedence with unbuilt
>kits -
>> > if you build one, your name turns to mud. Then they kill you.
>>
>> Why would the Heathkit people care whether I assemble a Cromemco
>Dazzler
>> kit? :-)
>
>The Heathkit People can't see very well, they carry hot soldering
>irons,
>and they kill first and ask questions later. Certain areas near
>Benton
>Harbor are *very* dangerous at night. Be carefull out there.
>
>BTW, after getting my H-8 chassis last week, I found a complete H-8
>today.
>Yet another data-point supporting Rax's "bait" theory.
Damn. I wish I'd known this a zillion years ago when I could have
grabbed an
H-11 shell I saw in an L.A. scrapyard.
I'd be using it for trolling right about now . . .
Jeff
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
I picked up a cartridge at a flea market. It says PARTNER 128, Cat. No.
7361, (C)1985 TIMEWORKS, INC. What is this thing?
--Alan
--
Computing since: 1982, VIC-20, CoCo, PC, CP/M
Military Computers: COMTRAN 10, Nida 250
Amateur Radio since: 1971, WN8JEF, KA6EXR, N8BGR, AA4ZI
BASIC, dBASE, Assembly, C++
mailto: oajones(a)bright.net
< Tony Duell wrote:
< > Agreed. If I ever get an unbuilt kit my first reaction is to build the
< > thing. Examples of 1970's packaging are not very interesting to me :-
<
< I disagree. I have three unassembled Cromemco Dazzler kits. I plan to
< assemble one. But if I only had one unassembled kit I think I'd leave i
< that way. I personally do find the packaging to be of interest.
I'm with tony as the early altairs were not packaged other than needed for
shipping. Mine was very early and mostly poly bags of stuff like screws,
nuts washers wires and non esd sensitive parts, MOS parts in black foam
and sockets in pink foam. The PC card were between sheets of cardboard and
it was all in a box with a xeroxed 4th generation manual with atleast two
erata sheets for each board. Not much to look at. Some of the later
8800a and the 8800b machine had some nice bent corrigated and all.
Allison
< The only thing on the board is what's on the handle; "M8186". There is
< circular sticker on the underside of one handle that says "mpg jun/81"
< it. There are four 40-pin sockets (individual pin sockets on the board)
< with the following configuration:
<
< 1) AMI 303D & AMI 302F on 8048 DEC
< 2) AMI 303D & AMI 303D on 8117 DEC
< 3) Empty
< 4) AMI 304E
What's th3 point it's a m8186 kdf-11, aka 11/23? the only thing I can add
about it is it appears to have the FIS (floating point extended
instruction set)
that should run most anything in the way of DEC OSs with the only
question being is it limited to 18bit or 22bit able. The latter being
less of an issue unless your using more than 256k of ram or certaion
backplanes/periperals.
< One of my problems is that 4 8" drives are my only storage devices. Any
< advice on getting RT-11 or RSX on 8" floppies? I have a bunch of disks,
< though I have no way of knowing if they're any good, but no way to writ
< to them.
RT-11 was nominally supplied on rx01 (8" single density) or rx02 (8"
double density) floppies. RSX-11 wants a hard disk for swapping and all.
< As far as the Multifunction board, I checked the pins of the console
< port with a scope but I can't seem to get anything from it at boot. I
< checked the scope on another serial output source and it seems to be
< working OK, so I'm assuming that the port on the PDP just isn't giving m
1 which port there are two?
2 is one of the ports set up as a console?
3 is the rom on the MXV setup for the correct boot and is the rom
installed?
4 can you hit break and get console ODT prompt and actions?
There is a good possibility you have a improperly configured MXV-11
and there is a sea of jumpers on it and it must have the correct proms
installed as well.
< any console messages immediately on power up? Does it display the POST
< procedure, like my Vaxstation? One Sun 3/50 I had with 12 megs of ram to
No! The BDV11 if you had it does.
< around a minute to display a console message; should there be a long del
< like that when booting a PDP-11?
If there is a few hundred K maybe 10-20 sec. usually you hear some disk
activity before that and then it boots.
You vax and Sun knowledge is not helping you as this isn't them.
Allison
At 08:24 PM 10/5/98 -0500, you wrote:
>I've always wanted to know which machines have only a single instance
>represented on this list.
If I've got any that aren't duplicated, I'd guess them to be:
NEC PC-8201 (not the PC-8201A)
Datavue 25
Iasis Computer-in-a-Book (I think Hal Layer has one, but I don't think he's
on the list)
Symbolics 3600
Seequa Chameleon?
Sanyo MBC-8000
Zenith ZP-150?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 08:38 PM 10/5/98 -0700, you wrote:
>How many people have a Chameleon? A friend of mine gave it to me probably 5
>or so years ago when he was cleaning out his garage.
Bzzzt... Got three. Also have some scans (from a former employee of
Seequa) of one of the brochures. (Gotta remember to get back to him to get
more info.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
At 03:44 PM 10/5/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Just for the hell of it, I thought I'd make a list of the Top 10 Holy Grails
>of classic microcomputer computer collecting. This is the "Rembrandt in the
Hmmm... Seems like your list got garbled in transmission... Here's what
it should have looked like, I think:
Canon FlatCat
STM Systems Baby! 1
Teleram Model 4000 and 5000
Atari ST Book and ST Pad
Apricot Portable
Dynalogic Hyperion
Osborne "Encore" and "Vixen"
Gavilan
GRiD Compass 1100
Toshiba T1100
Unfortunately, I've only got one of those so far.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.sinasohn.com/
Although it's certainly interesting, I doubt my new-found knowledge
of the first microprocessor is going to radically change any of my
view of the world. F14CADC doesn't mean anything different than
4004. But, what I guess might be significant is that this shows how
major an impact the military has played on computers. The ENIAC,
F14CADC, DEC Alpha, and other stuff I'm sure can all be attributed
to the pentagon.
And _that_ is significant because instead of saying that the computer
is a triumph of enterpreneurs and daring capitalists, we can _also_
say that it is a triumph of America's great war machine.
>
>the F14 CADC was the first microcomputer system that made fly by wire
>practical. The 4004 was the first commercially viable single chip CPU.
>Clear statments that do not conflict but do make a statment that points
>to their significance.
>
>< I'm not denying that Holt produced a CPU, and it may be important in
th
>< history of military computers. It is irrelevant in the history of
the
>< personal computer unless there was a personal computer designed that
>< included it or a direct descendant.
>
>Or the technology that made the silicon possible for later commercial
>designs. It doesn't have to be the same design.
>
>< I think it's great that Holt got his story out. Footnotes always add
>< depth, but no chapters need to be rewritten.
>
>The assuption is they are accurate chapters. ;) the depth is needed to
>see how the later chapters are significant.
>
>
>Allison
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>>There's some evidence to suggest that the Lisa is the Apple VI, which raises
>>>the question of what happened to IV and V.
>>
>> I think it would be more accurate to say that Apple considered naming the
>> Lisa the Apple IV. "Lisa" was originally just a code name, after all.
>
>In what way can that be said to be more accurate?
"...Lisa is the Apple IV" gives one the impression that the Apple IV was
a definite computer, rather than just a name that was considered, but
never actually used, for the Lisa.
It is quite probable Apple considered using the name "Apple IV" for many
computers that shipped after the Apple ///. Said Steve Wozniak, in
reference to the Apple ///, "...when we reintroduced it we should have
called it the Apple IV." (The Mac Bathroom Reader, pg 34).
My point is, "Apple IV" is such a logical name for a computer from Apple
that it could have been considered for just about anything. "Apple IV",
however, is not the sort of name that was used as a codename at Apple,
and therefore most likely would not have been called so in the
development stage, though there are many prototypes that could have ended
up bearing that name.
Of course, I'm just hypothesizing here. :-)
>Aside from the marketing model numbers, the only information I've ever found
>regarding alternate names that may have been considered was the story about
>the name "Applause".
According to _The Mac Bathroom Reader_, by Owen Linzmayer, page 80:
"Apple figured it needed a more professional-sounding name to appeal to
the business market, so it hired an outside consulting firm to recommend
a new name. Among others, they suggested Applause, Apple IV, Apple 400,
The Coach, Espirit, Teacher, and The World. Quite an effort went into
thinking up a different name, but the forthcoming computer had already
received so much press coverage under its code name that Apple reverse
engineereed the explanation that Lisa stood for 'Local Integrated
Software Architecture'"
If you're interested in reading about Mac History & prototypes, _The Mac
Bathroom Reader" by Owen Linzmayer and _AppleDesign_ by Paul Kunkel are
both excellent books.
Tom Owad
--
Sysop of Caesarville Online
Client software at: <http://home.earthlink.net/~tomowad/>
I just received an email from a local group which has 250 new in
box Aquarius cassette recorders. They are taking bids but I
suspect you can't just buy a few but would have to take the whole
lot. I have one but could use at least one more and maybe two and
it would be nice to have the box and any doc or cables. Is there
any interest in this out there? If so, how much would people be
willing to pay? Don't forget shipping costs. Let me know. BTW,
"local" in this case is Houston, TX.
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
Do you have the manuals? You'll need to check the port definitions that are
set via jumpers on the open DIPs near the back of the motherboard.
Also, I seem to recall that North Star DOS was generated for a specific RAM
size -- I believe it's top-resident. A DOS set up for 16K would work on 32K
or 48K, but not vice versa.
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: David Williams [mailto:dlw@trailingedge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 1998 3:38 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: North Star Horizon Help
Ok, I have a few minutes now to play around with the N* Horizon
I've been fixing up. I've tried to power it up and it seems to hit the
disk drive and then nothing. I've plugged some spare terminals into
the port marked "Video Terminal Port" and played with baud rates
and other comm settings but get nothing on any of my terminals.
Also tried straight through and flipped comm cables. Can
someone give me some info on these and maybe walk me through
getting it set up and running so I can check and see if I've missed
something? Oh, I'm trying both N*DOS 5.2 and N* CP/M 2.2.
Thanks.
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
I have one; does anyone know where I could get a tape drive and some
cartridges for it?
>The TI CC-40 exists for sure - I've seen several of them.
>
>Bob
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Bob Withers Do or do
not, there is no try.
>bwit(a)pobox.com
Yoda
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>On Tuesday, October 06, 1998 7:07 PM, Kai Kaltenbach
[SMTP:kaikal@microsoft.com] wrote:
>> New computers announced at the 1983 CES:
>>
>> Vaporware? Please respond if you KNOW any of these exist for SURE.
>>
>> - Panasonic JR-200 (I think this may exist)
>> - Sanyo PCH20/PHC25 (Z80, 4K/16K, $99/$199)
>> - STM Pied Piper (CP/M portable, 64K, $1295)
>> - TI 99/2 (Supposedly $100, including 4.2K RAM)
>> - TI CC-40 (Compact Computer 40, laptop like Epson HX-20, 4 AA cells,
31
>> character LCD display, $249)
>> - Unisonic Futura 8300 (Z80, 2K, Sinclair BASIC, $90)
>> - Video Technology VZ200 (Z80, 4K, MS BASIC, $99)
>>
>> Not Vaporware
>>
>> - Jupiter Ace
>> - Mattel Aquarius
>> - Spectravideo SV-318
>> - Timex Sinclair 2000
>>
>>
>> By the way, has anyone actually seen an TI 99/4 (not 4a)?
>>
>> Kai
>>
>>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Let's get this into the proper perspective here there is only one "Holy Grail"
(unless you read National Inquirer then there are millions for $39.98 plus
shipping and handling)
Let's see if I can think of some true 'Holy Grails' of computing:
1) The pre Apple 1 prototype Steve Wozniac brought to the Homebrew Computer Club.
2) The original code listing for the BASIC he hand typed to demonstrate that computer.
3) The PDP-1 used to write and play Space War at MIT (with the original game controls)
( I know it's not a micro, but I like the idea. )
4) 'The original' paper tape of BASIC that was pirated from Bill Gates.
Now those would be 'holy grails,' something along the lines of you either
don't tell anyone or are very carefull who you tell that you own them.
Larry
--
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Larry Anderson - Sysop of Silicon Realms BBS (300-2400bd) (209) 754-1363
Visit my Commodore 8-Bit web page at:
http://www.goldrush.com/~foxnhare/commodore.html
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
> From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
> Subject: Re: Somebody has a C65 on eBay
>
> On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
>
> > ::
> > ::Somebody's posted a Commodore C65 prototype on eBay. 4 days left and the
> > ::bidding is at $1025.
> > ::
> >
> > That's nothing. The last one sold went for $1400. (!)
>
> Well, how many of these "prototypes" exist? Has anyone authenticated
> these things?
I would venture to guess a couple hundred to several hundred. Commodore was
almost to production before they decided to drop the C65 (I remember reading
1991 as the year they dopped the project). After Commodore went bankrupt some
of thier warehouse assetts were liquidated, the Graprvine Group in New York
had bought the one with the most c65s and were selling them for I think about
$100 a unit. It kinda resembles an Amiga 500 with the floppy drive facing
forward (no neumeric keypad).
The c65 would best be compared to the Apple IIgs, still has its roots in the
6502 but alot of the graphics and sound are adapted from Amiga technology. It
would have done well with the people wanting a more amiga-like system without
sacrificing all thier Commodore 8-bit drives and such.
There are enough c65s out there that some people have FTP sites of c65
programs. Unfortunately I wasn't one of the people who got a c65 on time. *sigh*
--
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Larry Anderson - Sysop of Silicon Realms BBS (300-2400bd) (209) 754-1363
Visit my Commodore 8-Bit web page at:
http://www.goldrush.com/~foxnhare/commodore.html
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
> Intel supplied the ammunition for a
>revolution: cheap computers. The high level of integration was what
>enabled them to make it cheap, and they commercialized it. The level of
>integration is the salient feature of the chip, but not the main feature
>of the important event.
It *certainly* wasn't obvious in the mid-70's, when Intel had picked
up its pieces and put together a microprocessor chip (the 8080A) which cost
a significant fraction of what a new car cost at the time, that
VLSI CPU's were going to be replacing boards full of TTL logic.
It was Intel's competitors - notably Motorola and especially MOS
Technology - who were responsible for driving microprocessor CPU costs
to the hundred-dollar-level and below. That's when times really began
a-changin'.
Tim.
The TI CC-40 exists for sure - I've seen several of them.
Bob
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Withers Do or do not, there is no try.
bwit(a)pobox.com Yoda
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Tuesday, October 06, 1998 7:07 PM, Kai Kaltenbach [SMTP:kaikal@microsoft.com] wrote:
> New computers announced at the 1983 CES:
>
> Vaporware? Please respond if you KNOW any of these exist for SURE.
>
> - Panasonic JR-200 (I think this may exist)
> - Sanyo PCH20/PHC25 (Z80, 4K/16K, $99/$199)
> - STM Pied Piper (CP/M portable, 64K, $1295)
> - TI 99/2 (Supposedly $100, including 4.2K RAM)
> - TI CC-40 (Compact Computer 40, laptop like Epson HX-20, 4 AA cells, 31
> character LCD display, $249)
> - Unisonic Futura 8300 (Z80, 2K, Sinclair BASIC, $90)
> - Video Technology VZ200 (Z80, 4K, MS BASIC, $99)
>
> Not Vaporware
>
> - Jupiter Ace
> - Mattel Aquarius
> - Spectravideo SV-318
> - Timex Sinclair 2000
>
>
> By the way, has anyone actually seen an TI 99/4 (not 4a)?
>
> Kai
>
>
In a message dated 10/6/98 5:25:47 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
oajones(a)bright.net writes:
> Hi David,
> I would be interested in one cassette recorder.
myself included. perhaps two if the price is low.
I think it's helpful to say that a computer is any implement,
mechanical or otherwise, to aid in calculation. But this means rocks,
fingers, and calculators are all computers. I guess we can say, any
machine which is capable of performing something besides addition,
mulitplication, subtraction, division without further input from the
user. Thus, I guess a computer must either have stuff like that
hard-coded (like a slide-rule) or be programmable.
So, from this 1-min. train of thought, I say:
A computer is any implement capable of processing super-arithmetic
functions.
BTW, my New Bantam English Dictionary says: A machine capable of
performing highly complex mathematical calculations at very high
speed.
>calculator, reckoner. spec. a person employed to make calculations in
an
>observatory, in surveying, etc.
>1646 Sir T. Browne Pseud. Ep. vi vi 289 The Clenders of these
computers.
>1704 ....
>
>I've heard that some newer editions of the OED have added some of the
>more modern usages.
>
>
>> an industry that in my lifetime went from the early commercial vacuum
>> tube machines to the 64bit CPU chip running some thousands of times
>> faster.
>
>And with software that has grown to compensate for the speed of the
>hardware and keep the usefulness of the system where it was.
>
>
>Nevertheless, it WOULD help if we agreed on basic definitions of our
>fundamental terminology.
>
>
>--
>Fred Cisin cisin(a)xenosoft.com
>XenoSoft http://www.xenosoft.com
>2210 Sixth St. (510) 644-9366
>Berkeley, CA 94710-2219
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Ok, I have a few minutes now to play around with the N* Horizon
I've been fixing up. I've tried to power it up and it seems to hit the
disk drive and then nothing. I've plugged some spare terminals into
the port marked "Video Terminal Port" and played with baud rates
and other comm settings but get nothing on any of my terminals.
Also tried straight through and flipped comm cables. Can
someone give me some info on these and maybe walk me through
getting it set up and running so I can check and see if I've missed
something? Oh, I'm trying both N*DOS 5.2 and N* CP/M 2.2.
Thanks.
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
My personal list is much smaller and more mundane.. and more personal, these
are machines I actually worked on when I was very young.
1) Compucolor 2 (The Model with floppy disk in the monitor housing)
- I let one of these, working w/ software slip through my hands about 4-5
years ago
2) an Exidy Sorcerer
- I have a story about loosing a huge folder full of software and papers
because I left them at a computer store where I was working on one; when I
came back next week, they had folded and were gone. every time one comes up
on the net, I'm too late, alas.
3) Ohio Scientific Challenger 4p (?)
-Matt Pritchard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kai Kaltenbach [SMTP:kaikal@MICROSOFT.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 05, 1998 5:45 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: Top 10 Holy Grails of Classic Microcomputer Collecting
>
> Just for the hell of it, I thought I'd make a list of the Top 10 Holy
> Grails
> of classic microcomputer computer collecting. This is the "Rembrandt in
> the
> Attic" sort of stuff. These are roughly in my opinionated order, but
> somewhat randomly ordered:
>
> 1. The Altair prototype that was to be the cover photo for Popular
> Electronics but was lost in shipment
> 2. Xerox Alto
> 3. Mark 8
> 4. Scelbi 8H
> 5. Kenbak-1
> 6. Micral 8008
> 7. Apple I
> 8. An unassembled Altair 8800 Kit
> 9. Busicom Japan Intel 4004-based Calculator
> 10. IBM 5100
>
> Kai
>
>
< >> Don't you mean 1801R and 1801S? My early 18xx book doesn't list any
< > Both. Mine do, I have an unusual collection of RCA data books with al
<
< Well, don't leave us in suspense. What's an 18101? Did it come before
< or after the 1801R/1801S pair?
During... it was the SBC with both chips.
Allison
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998 Sam Ismail wrote:
>> ::Somebody's posted a Commodore C65 prototype on eBay. 4 days left and the
>> ::bidding is at $1025.
>>
>> That's nothing. The last one sold went for $1400. (!)
>
>Well, how many of these "prototypes" exist? Has anyone authenticated
>these things?
I'd say quite a few. A couple of years ago a company which sells Amiga &
Commodore spares listed C65s in their ad in Amiga Computing magazine.
Christmas 96 issue, Paxtron corporation ad:
Motherboards (factory new)
C65 inc. all chips, latest ROM (PAL only) $70
C65 service manual $20
There is/was also a C65 mailing list.
-- Mark
>So would it be possible to come up with a group sanctioned list of
>definitions for:
> computer (generic)
Someone who calculates numbers
> digital computer
Someone who uses an electronic calculator to calculate numbers
> analog computer
Someone who uses an abacus to calculate numbers
> minicomputer
The assistant to the Computer
> microcomputer
The assistant to the Computer's assistant
> processor
Someone who collects and delivers the finished calculations
> microprocessor
...his assistant
> mainframe
The big connecting series of tables where all these people work from
Sorry guys, but after the day I had at work, I needed to interject a
shot of humor
Jeff Salzman
Tongue-in-cheek
Thanks for the other responses about the cards, I think I have all the
Plessey clone cards identified with the DEC models.
However, I am a little confused on my CPU board identification. The board
is an M8186, which I have searched on and found to be a KDF11-AA. Or
KDF11-AB. Or KDF11-AC. The problem is that I can't find any revision code
on the board. To add to the confusion, the original configuration sheet in
the case lists the CPU board as a KDF11-HF, of which I haven't been able
to find any info at all. Does anyone have any info on this CPU, or can you
tell me how to identify which board it actually is?
Also, I have looked everywhere for a CPU/OS matrix and haven't found it.
Could someone provide me with a URL or just a quick hand-rolled list of
what versions of which OS run on which processor?
The multifunction board is Plessey #MFV11A; same as DEC MXV11A? I tried to
make a console cable using the pinouts on the sunsite PDP-11 page with no
success, setting the terminal at 4800baud. Is there something I'm missing
here, or can someone suggest how to wire the cable? I just arranged a
loner scope (my Tek is basically dead), so I'll start going pin-by-pin
until I figure it out, but a "here's how to wire the cable" would sure
help a lot.
Finally, is there anyone who remembers these clones? Does anyone have
_any_ documentation on them at all? Anything really different from a
standard DEC PDP-11? The front panel calls it a "Plessey Periperal Systems
- Micro II." It has 6 switches on the panel: write protect switches for
the two internal 8" floppies, the cpu halt/enable switch, a boot switch,
an LTY on/off switch, and the power switch. Any info at all would be
greatly appreciated.
I feel like I've just stepped into the pages of a wild adventure book...
Aaron
At 01:30 PM 10/6/98 -0500, Doug wrote:
>I'm not denying that Holt produced a CPU, and it may be important in the
>history of military computers. It is irrelevant in the history of the
>personal computer unless there was a personal computer designed that
>included it or a direct descendant.
So do you judge Xerox's impact on the "personal computer" as their Xerox
820 II or 8/16 machines or by the impact PARC had on user interface
metaphors? One of the more subtle things that this sort of blanket
statement misses is that places like the Silicon valley are filled with
folks going from job to job and bringing their knowledge (some of it
classified) with them. Xerox had a tremendous impact on Sun because a lot
of ex-Xeroids went to work there (look at a Dandelion box and a Sun 3/160
sometime :-)
The impact of Ray's design could be indirectly felt by people who worked
with him and went elsewhere.
--Chuck
I think RSX has something called autoconfig which will tell you how
your system is configured (apparently by actually touching the
hardware).... RT-11 can only tell you a part of the information,
and only if it matches the configuration of the handers...
SHOW CONFIG
will tell you about the machine itself (processor, memory, fpu, etc)
while
SHOW DEVICES
will list all the devices for which at least the CSR the handler knows
about responds... even if the CSR is the wrong one for that handler...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
< ::It was Intel's competitors - notably Motorola and especially MOS
< ::Technology - who were responsible for driving microprocessor CPU cost
< ::to the hundred-dollar-level and below. That's when times really bega
< ::a-changin'.
Tim is right as is was MOS Tech. that lobbed the biggest shot by offering
the 6502 for a mere $20 (single unit price!) at one of the computer shows.
< I agree with this. The 6502 architecture and the 6800/68000 series did m
Where did zilog fit in... they certainly improved on the 8080, they did
it cheaper and had a design that was easier to use too. Forced intel
to emphasize the 8085 that didn't extend the instructionset of the 8080
any significant amount.
< to advance low-cost computing than anything Intel did. Intel seemed perf
< satisfied to stay in the high-end market until relatively recently.
I strongly disagree. The following were Intel chips aimed at low to mid
end applications/markets.
8048/9 series
the 8088 and 80188 parts (8bit bus lower cost to use design with)
8051 series
That may not be the total list either.
The market that intel couldn't or didn't care to be in was the $1 single
chip microprocessor market where TMS1000, COPS, uCOM4 and other 4bitters
can and did have a distinct presence.
Allison
I received a tip last year that a long time
computer business located in Mobile, Alabama was
a virtual storehouse of vintage machines.
I payed them a visit and could not get past the
receptionist. I was told that they occasionally
donated the things to be used in educational
institutions but that they were absolutely not
interested in selling anything.
About six months later I learned that the business
had closed. Subsequently, I was told by a veteran
employee of this firm that when they shut their
doors they hauled two Xerox Altos (among many others)
to the landfill.
I told this person that it was unlikely
that they would ever have been in possesion of Xerox
Altos but he was adamant that they were indeed Xerox Altos.
In hindsight, I now wish I had fibbed to that receptionist
and told her
that I was connected with the University of Alabama.
Bob Wood
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com