______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: CRT decay
Author: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu at internet
Date: 10/31/98 11:05 PM
>I've got an old CRT that is decaying along the glass edges.
Are you saying the phosphor is peeling off the inside of the tube, the
aquedag peeling off, or is the glass actually deteriorating? I've
never seen glass deteriorate and have some television kinescopes
(CRT's) which are close to sixty years old and show no sign of decay,
including the aquedag and phosphor.
Marty
I've seen foam turn to dust, rubber turn to goo, batteries turn to acid,
but I hadn't expected CRT glass to revert to sand. Sam tells me that he's
seen something similar on his Soroc terminal.
What process is causing this? Isn't glass basically SiO2? I assume it's
crystalizing rather than oxidizing.
Anything I can do to prevent it from occurring on other tubes?
Any interesting risks associated with firing an electron gun at this
crystalized stuff with no remaining phosphor?
-- Doug
------ Message Header Follows ------
Received: from lists2.u.washington.edu by smtp.itgonline.com
(PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.1.9i(b5) for Windows NT(tm))
id AA-1998Oct31.230501.1767.74354; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 23:05:01 -0500
Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
by lists2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with SMTP
id UAA20225; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 20:02:52 -0800
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP
id UAA23226 for <classiccmp(a)lists.u.washington.edu>; Sat, 31 Oct 1998
20:02:48 -0800
Received: from behemoth.host4u.net (behemoth.host4u.net [209.150.128.29])
by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.1+UW98.09) with ESMTP id UAA25
293
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 20:02:48 -0800
Received: from localhost (yowza@localhost)
by behemoth.host4u.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA21696
for <classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 22:02:47 -0600
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.95.981031214459.29291I-100000(a)behemoth.host4u.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 22:02:44 -0600 (CST)
Reply-To: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner(a)u.washington.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com>
To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers"
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: CRT decay
In-Reply-To: <m0zZoMa-000IyMC@p850ug1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
X-Sender: yowza(a)behemoth.host4u.net
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
>> be helpfull. Do you have some, ode do you know someone who does ?
> Yes. Don Maslin, who reads this list, will send you CP/M and a bunch of
> other disks. He has almost every CP/M disk format known to man -- he does
> a great job.
Do you have his eMail address, so I could mail him ?
> There were a couple different models of the Kaypro 4 (Kaypro reused their
> model numbers even after making major internal design changes -- I detest this
> practice of reusing model numbers; so far Kaypro is the only company I've seen
> that does this). I think each needs a different version of CP/M.
I think this is better then just anounce every other month a
'new' model, while they changed only som screws.
> Take the case off, and look for a number like 8x-xxx-x on one or more of the
> chips on the motherboard. The last x may be a letter (probably A) or a number
> or might not be there at all. Kaypro's part-numbering system was rather
> erratic, it seems.
> 81-240 original (1983? maybe 1982) Kaypro 4
> 81-232 1983 Kaypro 4
> 81-184 1984 Kaypro 4 (a.k.a. Kaypro 4'84)
> 81-292 1984 Kaypro 4 (newest ROM version for this machine)
> 81-296 Kaypro 4X (with super-high-density floppies)
> 81-146 character ROM
> 81-187 character ROM
> 81-235 character ROM
On the Backside ther's some type number: 81-015 (if I remember
right) I don't know if it's for the whole machine or what and
can't see it fiting in your sceme.
Thank you
Hans
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
an excellent source of pinouts for apple ][ connectors is the apple service
technical procedures peripheral interface guide.
I have this book and it has the pinouts and peripheral configurations for
every apple model and peripheral from the apple ][ through the lisa and mac
II. this book also provides cable specs as well so one can make his own cable
also. this book would have some valuable info for everyone if there was an
easy way to copy it.
david
In a message dated 11/2/98 4:33:17 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
dastar(a)ncal.verio.com writes:
> I have the pinouts for the Apple ][ bus among other connectors inside the
> Apple ][ and don't know where to submit it (and sorry for this public
> posting but I don't know Aaron's e-mail address).
>
> Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar@siconic.
> com
> < enough to open a PSU. I read in a book once that opening a PSU will
> < cause damage to a special layer that prevents interference from the
> < PSU to the motherboard. I haven't been able to substantiate this...
> If that doesn't sound bogus to you I have swampland in florida to
> sell you. It's bogus.
Nono, always remember, The robots that closed the PSU have
been especialy trained to do it the right way - if you just
close the cover you might confuse the electrons ! And I have
some nice land along the Main river in Franken real cheap,
you may only have to wait until the 4 feet (1.1m) of water
are gone ...
Gruss
Hans
P.S.: The part about the water is true.
--
Ich denke, also bin ich, also gut
HRK
This person left this message on the Obsolete Computer Helpline. If
anyone can help, please write him directly at his email address in
Brazil, not to me.
----------------------------
Danilo R. Costa <danilofilho(a)uol.com.br>
Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil - Sunday, November 01, 1998 at 19:27:22
I'sorry but I dont speak English. I need a schematic diagram of the
TRS Color Computer ( Coco 1 or 2).
You can help me?
Thanks
the drive was indeed mfm. the models 50 and 70 had drives that connected to a
riser card which then went to the planar. there were no cables on the 50 or
70.
david
In a message dated 11/2/98 10:30:17 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
roblwill(a)usaor.net writes:
> The PS/2 Model 30=286 didn't have a cable going to the riser card in it,
> nor was it an MCA machine. It was an ISA machine, and The HD plugged into
> the motherboard via ribbon cable. I'm not even sure if it was an ESDI
> drive. I think it was just an MFM that had everything (including power) on
> one cable.
>
> -Jason
The PS/2 Model 30=286 didn't have a cable going to the riser card in it,
nor was it an MCA machine. It was an ISA machine, and The HD plugged into
the motherboard via ribbon cable. I'm not even sure if it was an ESDI
drive. I think it was just an MFM that had everything (including power) on
one cable.
-Jason
***********************************************
* Jason Willgruber *
* (roblwill(a)usaor.net) *
* *
* http://members.tripod.com/general_1 *
* ICQ#-1730318 *
* /0\/0\ *
* > Long Live the 5170! *
* \___/ *
************************************************
----------
> From: John Rollins <rexstout(a)uswest.net>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: RE: Classic != IBM AT
> Date: Monday, November 02, 1998 8:26 PM
>
>
> Hmm.. Would the 486 system I had a while back count? I forget who made
it,
> model A3000. 486DX/33 AMD CPU and FPU and some other chips were on a
small
> daughterboard that fit into a slot in the front of the computer, which
> interfaced to an MCA slot... Now that's gotta be wierd for anything.
> Closest thing to that I can think of is the hard drives IBM used in some
> PS/2's that interfaced directly to the MCA bus(interface built in to the
> drive's controller board with a cable going to the MCA riser card in the
> Model 30-286 and maybe the 55sx too). That 486 was fun, wish I still had
> it... :-|
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> | http://members.tripod.com/~jrollins/index.html - Computers |
> | http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Lair/1681/ - Star Trek |
> | orham(a)qth.net list admin KD7BCY |
> | ham-mac(a)qth.net Portland, OR |
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Was it Aaron Finney who was doing the Pinout collection?
I have the pinouts for the Apple ][ bus among other connectors inside the
Apple ][ and don't know where to submit it (and sorry for this public
posting but I don't know Aaron's e-mail address).
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always being hassled by the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 09/21/98]
Mitch Wright <mew_jac(a)swbell.net> wrote:
> Brings up another topic: Anybody got a Corvus Concept?
Yes. What, pray tell, were you up to with them?
-Frank McConnell
I consider anything that was marketed as a personal computer a
personal computer. I would not consider the PDP a personal computer if
I had one because it's not a personal computer. If you used a sedan
to haul around heavy things, would you call it a truck?
>>operate. If I could find a SYS/360 or SYS370, or Sigma/7 or Sigma/9
or
>
>That's exactly how I've viewed it as well. When I told people that
>my personal computer was a pdp-11/93 or a uVax system, they generally
>balked at the idea, though. I've had to remind them that it is a
>computer (that's never in question), and that I own it and use it.
>Hence a *personal* computer... And although I didn't have one back
>when the Imsai became available, I did get my first one (an 11/10)
>in 1980.
>
> Megan Gentry
> Former RT-11 Developer
>
>+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com
|
>| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com
|
>| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!'
|
>| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/
|
>| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler
|
>| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg
|
>+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>Of course, you may own a Cray 1 as your personal computer (used in the
>"accepted" meaning of personal property), but that doesn't make a Cray 1
>a "personal computer" in the taxonomical sense.
Let me offer that when a person talks about a 'personal computer', it
can be *anything*, including a cray-1. If, however, they talk about a
'peecee', then it probably means what you are referring to above.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
There is (or was, I haven't been by there in a while) a Radio Shack outlet
type store
at Gessner and I-10 here in Houston. I have no idea what they sell there, as
I
lived less than 2 miles from the place for 6 years, and never went. :-)
Kelly
In a message dated 11/1/98 6:35:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, gram(a)cnct.com
writes:
> > However, can you tell me more about the liquidation center? Do they have
> any
> > big items like computers? And do you know where the other location is?
> >
> > Maybe one of the ex-Radio Shack people should join in on this topic.
>
> More than five years with the company (starting 18 years ago tomorrow
> now that I think of it), never heard of such centers. Must be since
> my time.
>
>I suspect that you have several. Hence, what is currently in your
>repository?
Several machines? Yes... follow the link on my web page to my list of
home systems to see what I have up and running...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
In a computer lab at my school, there is an NEC Multisync 17+
monitor. When off, fingerprints are visible on the surface. I guess
it has some kind of finish that got eroded by skin oil. Could this be
similar? What is this CRT from again?
>> > I've got an old CRT that is decaying along the glass edges.
>>
>> Are you _sure_. Glass is normally pretty stable, and if it was really
>> decaying I would have expected the CRT to have imploded. There's
about
>> 1/2 a ton of force on the screen of even small CRTs.
>
>No, I'm not sure. When I first saw it, I thought mold was growing
along
>the edges, but closer examination showed that that "growth" was inside
the
>glass, and the patterns were somewhat crystaline. I'll let you know if
>it spontaneously implodes.
>
>> However, there are CRTs that are made with a laminated glass
faceplate -
>
>That's probably it. I saw beads along the edge, so it must be the
plastic
>that is crystalizing. I'll still let you know when it spontaneously
>implodes, though :-)
>
>> No remaining phosphor? This is strange... What on earth is going on?
>
>It's possible that the phosphor was simply hidden by the now-opaque
>plastic crystal.
>
>So, how do you detect these laminated CRTs, and can they be sealed to
>prevent this type of decay?
>
>-- Doug
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
< I know about that. A ROM-based debugger would be helpful if I don't
< have a bootable system.
helpful with what? Even a rom based debugger presumes there are some
system resources that work. For a PC that would mean keyboard, video,
some ram and of course the rom plus some of the glue hardware. In
reality the only thin not working at that point is the floppy/hard disks.
Also most debug monitors are minimalistic and assumptions are you have
sources for what your debugging and prints if hardware. For a PC that
is not likely.
For a PDP-11 and most of the systems I listed before that is likely or at
least so to the module level. Different systems concept.
Allison
< I had not realized that the TU-58 was normally an internal unit. The
< one I picked up some years ago was an external unit. Perhaps it came
< from a VAX 750 rather than a PDP-11/44 which is what I thought
< I had remembered.
it was available both ways. It was used in the 11/44, PDT-11/130,
VAX 11/730 and 750s as internal. The unit was also available as
external.
< Any idea of where that "C" source code is? It might be necessary to
< replace the TU-58.
I forget where but it's flakey code. It was written to run on a unix box.
The file I have is TU58-emu.zip.
Allison
< Yes, that is true. The problem is that I am afraid that the TU-58 I
< have is showing signs of problems and I wanted to have a spare
< if that was possible. Do anyone have a spare external TU-58
< available? I don't likely have much use for the TU-58 more
< than once or twice a year, but I can't predict when it might happen
< again.
TU58s have two problems, dirty heads and drive roller turning to gum.
The first is a cleaning problem. The second is age related. I have
a fix for the later. Basically it involoves removing the drive hub,
scraping the gunk off it and using PVC or rubber tubing to replace the
rubber part.
< As far as RT-11 is concerned, I actually saw RT-11 run on the TU-58,
< but at the time, the TU-58 was connected to a PC running an
Running the real thing is more fun.
< But, then the other version of RT-11 was V5.4G which had been
< patched to make it Year 2000 compatible. So, there was an
< actual 20 year old tape drive that looks like a disk drive under
RT being quite old is an enigma in that it keeps going!
Allison
< >or with any of the other PDP-11/44 systems, I am looking for a TU-58
< >tape drive which I understand came as an external unit with this system
<
< I know on mine, it's located in the same rack as the CPU and the RX02
< drives. It's not external. They did make external ones, though I don'
< have one.
It was internal and primary use was diagnostis as it was on a serial
line making it the easiest thing to bring up.
Also the 11/44 interface was slow for some reason and the TU58 was
limited to 4800 baud or the 44 would lose data.
< >Does anyone have one that they are not using? I understand they were
< >used for diagnostics and if the tapes and manuals are still available,
< >might still be useful. Otherwise, I have some old tapes I would like t
< >read.
I have several but I do use them. I can read tape and transfer to
RX01/2. This is assumeing the tapes are still good (binder isn't
flaking).
< It's possible to run RT-11 off of them, which I believe is where the
< external drive came into play.
Yes, I have an 11/23 with an external TU58 that runs RT11. The one
internal to the 44 could also run RT if memory serves. RT11/TU58 expects
a DL compatable serial line to use the DD driver.
>'Some X has Y' does not prove that 'All X have Y'.
Not to mention the Ys that you cant get to from any X.... *momentary Godel
possesion* I couldnt resist.
My apologies.
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
Sam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com> wrote:
> "Personal Computer" is such a worthless term; we should throw it out.
> Because even the timeshare computers could be used "personally" if someone
> hacked in and killed all the other users' processes.
:WARN @;BACKUP STARTING IN 5 MINUTES
Hacked in? I'll have you know I had full authority to abort their
sessions. I was the operator, after all, and we had a scheduled time
for the backup. Same time every night and I gave them 20 minutes
notice (and again at 15, 10, 5, 1, and 0). It wasn't my problem if
they didn't want to stick around 'til I was willing to let them log on
again.
And if I may say so, an HP3000 Series III made a damn fine personal
computer.
-Frank McConnell
Wrong.
I have forgotten the address to poke (or is it peek - some such action)
which
causes the AppleII (original, +, and E) to enter the system monitor
software.
Therein it is easily possible to manipulate all manner of system features
and
memory contents. If you need the exact information thus, I shall extract it
from
the manuals, etc that remain in my possession. I own a II+ and a II E,
since it
is only upon such machines that I may execute the Apple Worm (as published
in the May 1985 issue of Scientific American, Computer Recreations column)
which I wrote so many years ago.
William R. Buckley
-----Original Message-----
From: D. Peschel <dpeschel(a)u.washington.edu>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: PDP-11/44 boot prompt
>> "Max Eskin" <maxeskin(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > I mentioned that all Apple computers have debuggers/monitors.
>>
>> That's certainly not true.
>
>You need to substantiate your claim. Which Apple computers don't have ROM
>debuggers or monitors?
>
>-- Derek
>
>
>
I know perfectly well the accepted definition of personal computer but,
language is as much subjective as objective. So, though society may
subscribe to a specific definition, there is no reason to assume that
all persons of that society also agree to subscribe. After all, this is not
France, and we have no national language police. Nevertheless, your
point is well taken.
William R. Buckley
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: definition of personal computer
>> > For me, a personal computer is defined as any computer that I own
>> > and operate.
>
>Is it time again for our weekly semantics game already? OK!
>
>Personal Computer: a computer small enough for one person to easily
>transport, cheap enough for one person to easily afford, and simple enough
>for one person to operate (i.e., interactive). The first personal
>computer was Edmund Berkeley's GENIAC from around 1955.
>
>-- Doug
>
I'd like to put forward a documented record of hauling a PDP 11/45 and
TU-10 tape drive and separate racks up two flights of stairs into a third
floor apartment between three people.
I'm sure someone will challenge this record and put it to shame, but I was
impressed with the feat.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always being hassled by the man.
Coming in 1999: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 09/21/98]
< There shoudln't be any extra hazard from firing electrons at the screen,
< but I am still _very_ curious as to what's happening. I've used 40 or 50
< year old CRTs with no problems, you see.
I have two O'scope crts (3BP1 and a 2AP1) that are still good (they were
purchased as military surplus when I was a teen for homebrew use) and
neither were made much later than 1958 (maybe much older!). I know they
work as the scopes I built with them still operate! The glass
doesn't decay. If the phosphor is peeling it may be that someone has
vented the tube to remove the implosion hazard.
Allison
I suspect that you have several. Hence, what is currently in your
repository?
One interesting piece I have is a MicroWay 80860 board. It is
generally described as a single chip Cray 1, and can in bursts
(perhaps at greater rates) compute at 80MFLOPS on a 40MHz
clock. As it happens, this processor is not quite fast enough but,
with about 10 times the power, one could watch movies of flights
about the Mandelbrot set in real time at about 1600 by 1280 pixels
in 24 bit color.
William R. Buckley
-----Original Message-----
From: Megan <mbg(a)world.std.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: PDP-11/44 boot prompt
>
>>For me, a personal computer is defined as any computer that I own and
>>operate. If I could find a SYS/360 or SYS370, or Sigma/7 or Sigma/9 or
>
>That's exactly how I've viewed it as well. When I told people that
>my personal computer was a pdp-11/93 or a uVax system, they generally
>balked at the idea, though. I've had to remind them that it is a
>computer (that's never in question), and that I own it and use it.
>Hence a *personal* computer... And although I didn't have one back
>when the Imsai became available, I did get my first one (an 11/10)
>in 1980.
>
> Megan Gentry
> Former RT-11 Developer
>
>+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
>| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
>| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
>| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
>| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
>| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
>+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>
>
>Do they have any old laptop parts? Such as a HardDrive controller for a
>1400HD?
>
i'll check the next time I'm there (in a few days...) I'll let you know...
- Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
Do they have any old laptop parts? Such as a HardDrive controller for a
1400HD?
I know the 1400 isn't quite on-topic (1989), but I use it to keep all the
records for my other (over 10-yrs old) computers on. Now the HD controller
went, and I can't open anything (can't even boot the computer). Does that
make it on topic?
ThAnX,
-Jason (making a desperate attempt to stay OT)
***********************************************
* Jason Willgruber *
* (roblwill(a)usaor.net) *
* *
* http://members.tripod.com/general_1 *
* ICQ#-1730318 *
* /0\/0\ *
* > Long Live the 5170! *
* \___/ *
************************************************
----------
> From: Mike <dogas(a)leading.net>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: Computer cassettes
> Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 7:37 PM
>
> Hi.
> ]
> I live in Jacksonville, one of the two sites nationally of a Radio Shack
> Liquidation Center.... this weekend I picked up 40 new and sealed C-10
> leaderless certified computer cassette tapes for .25 apiece.... Anybody
> nead a few?
>
> Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
>
< Well, not to put too fine a line on it, all modern PC's have a built-in
< debugger. The Pentium has a built-in debug mode and brings the debug po
< out on the pins. I don't know of any PC maker that includes a debug por
has everyone forgotten POST codes already? All you need is a fairly
cheap card to display them.
Allison
Hi.
]
I live in Jacksonville, one of the two sites nationally of a Radio Shack
Liquidation Center.... this weekend I picked up 40 new and sealed C-10
leaderless certified computer cassette tapes for .25 apiece.... Anybody
nead a few?
Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
Right on!
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Strickland <jim(a)calico.litterbox.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: definition of personal computer
>Personal computer: Any computer owned by a single individual rather than a
>corporation or government entity. Alternately any computer with a low
enough
>aquisition and operation cost to BE owned by an individual. This fits
this
>group best, since especially the mini and mainframe collectors
>have such animals as their "personal computers".
>
>The semantics become simple.
>"What is this cray 1 you have in the basement?"
>"It's my personal computer."
>
>The fact that they're also supers, mainframes, minis, or micros becomes
>irrelivant.
>
>:)
>
>
>--
>Jim Strickland
>jim(a)DIESPAMMERSCUMcalico.litterbox.com
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Vote Meadocrat! Bill and Opus in 2000 - Who ELSE is there?
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
< personal computer. I would not consider the PDP a personal computer if
< I had one because it's not a personal computer. If you used a sedan
But, there were versions of the PDP-11 that were marketed as personal
computers. I can name not less than three different offering that were
desktop, personal, single user computers.
< to haul around heavy things, would you call it a truck?
No but it was never anything else nor could it be other than a taxi!
The problem is the computers were never called trucks or sedans.
Small computers that fit on a desk and are generally single user and
affordable by the then current standard were "personal computers".
Oh, a PC with an eithernet connection to a host is a WORKSTATION and
that is a valid use of the term.
The very flexibility and usefulness of small (desktop or deskside)
computers lent them to many different descriptions, names and uses
most overlaping.
Allison
< That is also a nice ability. But, BASIC isn't present in 386+ PCs.
< Does anyone know if there is some kind of commercial solution to this?
It's called POST, the last time I bought a POST board it was 59$ and
that was 3 years ago. it displays a two digit code that points to the
failed subsystem.
IBM systems also displayed a code to the CRT (if working) that also told
the problem.
Generally I've troubleshot PCs with nothing more than a VOM. Frequently
less.
Allison
< But whatever. It still doesn't explain why VCRs are always repaired to
< component level (and I've worked on VCRs with PQFP chips, multilayer
< boards, etc in them) and computers almost never are. Sure it may make
< sense _sometimes_ to change the module. But not always.
Here being the USA a VCR is $79 to $499, at 499 you repair, at 79
unless the problem is trivial it's a junker. NOTE: I'd used the term
cost of repair exceeds value of unit before. The average motherboard
for 386 and later machines it's unlikely to find 1488/9s on it or the
such. Then again fixing a damaged connector or fried HCT244 may make
sense. but if it's more than that, pull all the socketed stuff and
trash it as I can get used or new before I'll find a replacement for
the 84pin PQFP.
I've been through the exercize with a 386/486 clone board that the
external cache failed on. All I could do with it was disable the
external cache, pull the cache rams (they were all good) as it as it
was apparently one of the 84pin whatevers that developed a singular
failure. At the time of the failure the cost for a new 486 board
sans cpu was 69$ with twice the cache ram I had installed. I was able to
keep it going at reduced performance but repair was not possible unless
I found a similar clone and did a chip swap. IE: Cost of repair...
Eventually the board was torched to remove all the usable components
like the SIP resistors, clock cans, connectors and the like.
Allison
But if there's an error, isn't the post code displayed (if the display
works)?
>< Well, not to put too fine a line on it, all modern PC's have a
built-in
>< debugger. The Pentium has a built-in debug mode and brings the debug
po
>< out on the pins. I don't know of any PC maker that includes a debug
por
>
>has everyone forgotten POST codes already? All you need is a fairly
>cheap card to display them.
>
>Allison
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
That's right. It's a personal computer, but not because someone has it
in their house. I left out the model number on 'PDP' because I'm not
familiar with them, but several said that their PDP-11/?? were personal
computers just because they had it in their house.
>> I consider anything that was marketed as a personal computer a
>> personal computer. I would not consider the PDP a personal computer
if
>> I had one because it's not a personal computer.
>
>By your own criteria, the original PDP-8 *is* a personal computer. DEC
>specifically marketed it based on the it being small enough that
someone
>could transport it in their automobile (specifically, a Volkswagen),
and
>cheap enough that someone could afford it.
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
That is also a nice ability. But, BASIC isn't present in 386+ PCs.
Does anyone know if there is some kind of commercial solution to this?
>>< It's too bad most micros don't have a debugger in ROM. Except for
>>< computers made by Apple, I don't know of any.
>>Sorry, I meant home personal computers. PDPs, IMSAIs, various
>>development systems don't count. Satisfied?
>
>Most early "home computers" do have the functionality of a
>debugger in ROM - they just take decimal numbers, not Hex/Octal, and
>require you to type PEEK and POKE :-).
>
>Tim.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Well, I know all Apple ][s had monitors, and I haven't seen a mac
that doesn't have a debugger. Not sure about the Apple I and ///
>"Max Eskin" <maxeskin(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> I mentioned that all Apple computers have debuggers/monitors.
>
>That's certainly not true.
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
You know, it may have been better if this stuff was offered BEFORE it was
put on ePay. What's the sense of 'offering' it to everyone on the list
when they have to go through ePay anyway? All this basically is is an
advertisement.
-Jason
***********************************************
* Jason Willgruber *
* (roblwill(a)usaor.net) *
* *
* http://members.tripod.com/general_1 *
* ICQ#-1730318 *
* /0\/0\ *
* > Long Live the 5170! *
* \___/ *
************************************************
----------
> From: Greg Mast <gmast(a)polymail.cpunix.calpoly.edu>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
> Subject: FA: Apple Lisa and Apple IIC LCD Display
> Date: Sunday, November 01, 1998 4:24 PM
>
> I was a member of this list for quite a while but the mail load got to
> be too much for my school account.
>
> I have placed an Apple Lisa on the eBay auction today. I'm selling it
> for a friend. The bidding ends on Sunday the 8th of November. It has a
> noisy drive and the monitor doesn't come on. The guy selling it doesn't
> want to put any work into it so it's sold as-is.
>
> I posted some pictures at my page:
> http://www.calpoly.edu/~gmast/sfs/lisa/lisa.html
>
> I think this system will go for a good price. It will sell regardless.
> If this post offends anyone, I apologize but I know some people here
> might want one of these for their collection and this might be a good
> opportunity.
>
> For more info, check out the auction listing at:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=39295177
>
> and check out the pictures at the link above.
>
> I also listed one of those LCD displays for the Apple IIc. It's in great
> shape. The auction is at:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=39285574
>
> The bidding must take place through the auction now that I've listed
> them.
>
> Bidding is free but you must register with the auction.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg
< From: mbg(a)world.std.com (Megan)
<
< That's exactly how I've viewed it as well. When I told people that
< my personal computer was a pdp-11/93 or a uVax system, they generally
< balked at the idea, though. I've had to remind them that it is a
< computer (that's never in question), and that I own it and use it.
< Hence a *personal* computer... And although I didn't have one back
What I called a "personal computer"
In early 1975 it was an Altair8800.
In 1976 I added a COSMAC ELF.
In 1977 a SC/MP, Motorola 6800D1 were added.
In 1978 A North*star Horizon was the mainstay s100 crate and a Technico
9900 starter board.
In 1979 A Netronics explorer8085 was added to the collection.
in 1980 I would add a TK80 SBC and a IMSAI IMP48.
In 1981 a LSI-11 became mine.
The idea of a personal computer for me is quite old and predates even
the Altair. However, I would not own a "PC" (upper case denotes them
IBM and clone things) of my own until 1991, even then it was an XT
class clone (still have that too!)!
Oh, FASWE applies with here... FASWE = First Aquired Stays With Me.
Allison
< I think he means ROM Monitor, from personal experience I know it's nice
< have a ROM monitor that you can drop into and exercise the Hardware if
< don't have any boot media.
<
< Then again, why that would be helpful on a PC where you can get DOS with
< even trying, I don't know why it would be helpful.
Exactly! On a PC to run any code (even a rom debugger) enough resources
have to be there to nearly boot it. besides for hardware debug there are
POST and other codes.
Of course if someone wanted a debugger in rom most PCs still socket the
BIOS roms. it's a matter of codeing it up and adding the needed device
interfaces. On the whole not that useful.
Allison
< Besides Allison mentioned the IBM PC with ROM BASIC, and I've used a Zen
< Z248 (a 286) with a ROM Monitor that you can drop into, both of these ar
< definitly not developement machines. My NeXT slab had a ROM based monit
I think the z100 also had one.
Allison
< Sorry, I meant home personal computers. PDPs, IMSAIs, various
< development systems don't count. Satisfied?
< >SWTP 6800
< >ALTAIR-8800b (the front pannel is in a 1702 prom!)
< >Godbout 8080/front pannel replacement (octal keypad!)
< >Netronics Exploror 8085
< >CCS 2200 series s100 crate
< >Heath H8
< >Micromint SB180 (z180)
All of which are personal computers of that era and beyond!
If you ment the IBM PC and clones you have to be a bit more specfic.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, 2 November 1998 11:11
Subject: Re: definition of personal computer
>That at least reduces the number of terms we have to argue about by one
>(there's still "micro", "mini", "workstation", etc.)
I have semantic difficulty occasionally when describing my Vax 6000 as a
"mini-computer"
Considering it weighs in at 300+kg and is taller than my wife, it's mini
only in comparison to
something truly gigantic. IBM 360's or the like.
Cheers
Geoff
Computer Room Internet Cafe
Port Pirie
South Australia.
netcafe(a)pirie.mtx.net.au
>For me, a personal computer is defined as any computer that I own and
>operate. If I could find a SYS/360 or SYS370, or Sigma/7 or Sigma/9 or
That's exactly how I've viewed it as well. When I told people that
my personal computer was a pdp-11/93 or a uVax system, they generally
balked at the idea, though. I've had to remind them that it is a
computer (that's never in question), and that I own it and use it.
Hence a *personal* computer... And although I didn't have one back
when the Imsai became available, I did get my first one (an 11/10)
in 1980.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Sorry, I meant home personal computers. PDPs, IMSAIs, various
development systems don't count. Satisfied?
>< It's too bad most micros don't have a debugger in ROM. Except for
>< computers made by Apple, I don't know of any. I especially wish the
>< PC had a ROM debugger. It would really help me feel like I'm using a
>< worthwhile machine.
>
>Shows what you don't know. Non exhaustive list of micros with debug
roms:
>
>PDP-11/03, 11/23, 11/73, 11/83, 11/84 (most all the non front pannel
11s)
>
>SC/MP
>IMSAI IMP-48
>Kim-1
>SYM-1
>AMI EV68 series
>Motorola 6800D1 and D2
>intel SDK-80/85/88
>SWTP 6800
>ALTAIR-8800b (the front pannel is in a 1702 prom!)
>Godbout 8080/front pannel replacement (octal keypad!)
>Netronics Exploror 8085
>CCS 2200 series s100 crate
>Heath H8
>Micromint SB180 (z180)
>Intel MDS-800
>Intel MCS-8 (8008)
>MicroVAX series including VS2000, 3100, 4000 and others.
>
>I am very certain I've left a truckload of them off.
>
>Also if the PC had rom basic there are instruction in basic that allow
>access to memory, IO and machine language subroutines.
>
>Allison
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I was a member of this list for quite a while but the mail load got to
be too much for my school account.
I have placed an Apple Lisa on the eBay auction today. I'm selling it
for a friend. The bidding ends on Sunday the 8th of November. It has a
noisy drive and the monitor doesn't come on. The guy selling it doesn't
want to put any work into it so it's sold as-is.
I posted some pictures at my page:
http://www.calpoly.edu/~gmast/sfs/lisa/lisa.html
I think this system will go for a good price. It will sell regardless.
If this post offends anyone, I apologize but I know some people here
might want one of these for their collection and this might be a good
opportunity.
For more info, check out the auction listing at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=39295177
and check out the pictures at the link above.
I also listed one of those LCD displays for the Apple IIc. It's in great
shape. The auction is at:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=39285574
The bidding must take place through the auction now that I've listed
them.
Bidding is free but you must register with the auction.
Thanks,
Greg
Hi.
It must be the (near) full moon... the day... or.... *howlllll* *grrr* ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Strickland <jim(a)calico.litterbox.com>
>The biggest problem these older machines had was microsoft operating
systems.
>(okay, I'm a Unix/VMS bigot at heart, but DOS and win3.0/3.1 really WERE
that
>bad.)
I guess that before telling you how full of shit ( in a friendly way, of
course ) you are I should ask what your refering to here...
>>...but I've never met anyone who really LIKED these operating systems the
way the apple-heads liked prodos and gsos.
*statement now invalid*
Alas, (new) Apple-heads are turned-on by marketing ala translucent/green
repackaging. Dont get me wrong. the Woz is a god and Newton OS rocks, IIx
was cool...
The only thing that makes me seek non-ms oses is the programming ease
facilitated by microsoft in app development. Need some challenges
somewhere.... but I guess this is true for any programmer and their
preferred platform...
Mike: dogas(a)leading.net
.
< Allison... I am supprised - very. The BNC connector is a nice, easy to
< fit, reliable, waterproof, connector. The F-connector is a horrible
< little thing that (at least in the common version used in the UK) uses
< the central wire of the cable as the plug pin. I don't want to trust tha
< thing with my data.
They are actually very reliable and the cable industry uses them by the
ton. What often happens though is like any fine treaded item they can
be cross threaded and if the recepticle does not have a good spring
connector for the center wire then things fail. Considering I have a
house wide master antenna and also a house wide cable distribution
there must be at least 50 more F connectors in use and none have ever
given me grief.
Also I'm used to the older fully soldered BNCs (I still have the better
part of a pound coffee can of them) as I use them for all the O'scopes,
RF generators, radios (scanners, aircraft) and anything else that demands
a good shielded connection. But they are a PITA to assemble.
The one I consider the worst is the RCA, no lock, and tends to be loose
and noisy over time. Very popular with audio and video. I actually
have a bin full of locking rings that go around them to clamp them on.
Any test equipment with them installed gets opened and a BNC replacement
unless there is good reason not to.
< What, no Belling-Lee coaxial plugs (used for TV aerials in the UK, and
< thus very common over here) ? Or Pye coax plugs (screw-lock connectors,
< not common at all, but I have a reasonable stock of them)? And of course
< the SMA/SMB/SMC connectors.
I didn't want to go into some of the odd and esoteric like the TNCs.
Working with RF over the years I've hit most of them including pipe
(waveguides). Some types of cable like various sized hardlines from
the rg174 sized to the 2" stuff can use some odd connectors as well.
Heck I've been known to fix a sliced 10B5 cable using a pen knife and
vinyl electical tape until the Mill coms people could get to it. They
were horrified when the found it but, I finshed my printing and the
segment was working fine. Cables are part smoke and part majik. The
majik is putting the smoke back in when it leaks.
Allison
< repairshop trick to get more money, really. Companies help out a lot
< too. I'm sure schematics for a NSX Penitum-II 933 Turbo motherboard
You havent the first understanding of repair costs.
Lets assume that the chips and prints are available. there are only a
few chips and fairly easy to zero in on the failed one. Problem if it
takes an hour to do this (including remove and replaceing the bad chip)
thats easily 30-50$. Now that does not include getting the board out,
putting it back in assuring nothing else was wrong and running it for a
few hours (burnin). When a mother board costs between 49-499$ the
simple economics arent there. Also repairs are very hard to do on
multilayer boards (requires skilled people) and it's very easy to
compromise reliablity. Now if the failure was from lightining or a
power supply failure the whole board is likely cooked anyway.
This also side steps the problem of keeping special tools to desolder
the parts, keeping spares on hand, testing and all. All of these things
cost and if you have to keep a stock of parts (that can be come
antiquated) so you can turn equipment around fast (would you wait a
week for reapirs?) is expensive.