Doug,
I just revived my GRiD 1530 (and it was a pain)... Tandy still sells parts
for these (not many and pricey too!)
I bought a new mother board (only to later find out that my old one just
lacked memory) and a technical reference manual (what a waste of money).
What are you trying to find out?
Arfon
At 07:59 PM 5/18/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>
>You guys and gals are probably getting tired of my little GRiD updates,
>but here goes anyway...
>
>I am typing this message on the GRiDCase. So the modem works. 2400bps.
>
>I found Rob's GRiDBoard website, and from there found out that AST keeps
>the configuration files for a lot of old GRiDs on its website.
>
>I downloaded conf1520.exe from there.
>
>Now I have my doubts about this machine even being a GRiDCase 1520. Most
>of the configuration options don't work or are meaningless to this
>particular machine. Like the thing to set the backlighting on the display
>- my machine has a gas plasma display. And it seems to be telling me that
>my machine doesn't have a modem... so what the heck am I using right now?
>
>It did let me configure my expansion RAM from EMS to XMS... or was that
>the other way around? And it let me change my processor speed. But it
>wouldn't let me do anything with the hard disk and a whole bunch of other
>weird things.
>
>It's a '286 machine, magnesium alloy case, 1.44MB floppy, had a 20MB HD in
>it, has a 2400bps internal modem, standard PC ports, gas plasma display,
>two ROM sockets under a trapdoor above the keyboard... could this thing
>be anything other than a 1520?
>
>Note that is says "GRiDCASE 1500 Series" above the display.
>
>Now I suppose it's time to see if I can have the machine work *without* a
>hard drive installed. I just got a _very_ scary message about JVC drives
>seizing and taking HD controllers with them. (Thanks for the warning,
>Jason!)
>
>Of course, as the drive that was in the machine when I got it was seized
>up, the damage may already be done. And maybe that's why I'm still unable
>to access the HD. :(
>
>--
>Doug Spence
>ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
>http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
>
>
>
----------------------------------------
Tired of Micro$oft???
Move up to a REAL OS...
######__ __ ____ __ __ _ __ #
#####/ / / / / __ | / / / / | |/ /##
####/ / / / / / / / / / / / | /###
###/ /__ / / / / / / / /_/ / / |####
##/____/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_____/ /_/|_|####
# ######
("LINUX" for those of you
without fixed-width fonts)
----------------------------------------
Be a Slacker! http://www.slackware.com
Slackware Mailing List:
http://www.digitalslackers.net/linux/list.html
*I* don't think it is at all.
Apparently the SELLER thinks it's like an altair. I was complaining (read:
making fun of) the seller's silly choice of words. Probably because it has
switches and lights. Geez... I didn't know all machines with switches and
lights had the same architecture <grin>.
Jay West
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, June 07, 1999 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: **RARE** "Altair-like" HP1000 minicomputer K00L K00L Vintage!
<grin>
>>
>> Now that's the SECOND time I've seen someone list an HP1000 on Ebay
calling
>> it an "Altair-like HP1000".
>
>Can you please enlighten me as to how an HP1000 is like an Altair?
>
>-tony
>
>
Hi. In my last visit to a very nice junkyard (near Lisbon,
Portugal) I came across a box, a bit larger than a DECserver 300,
named DECmicroserver, having about 4 very large D connectors (3 rows
of pins) named "line 1" in the back. Anyone knows what it is? (I'm
really tempted to buy it).
Regards,
--
*** Rodrigo Martins de Matos Ventura <yoda(a)isr.ist.utl.pt>
*** Teaching Assistant and MSc. Student at ISR:
*** Instituto de Sistemas e Robotica, Polo de Lisboa
*** Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, Portugal
*** PGP Public Key available on my homepage:
*** http://www.isr.ist.utl.pt/~yoda
*** Key fingerprint = 0C 0A 25 58 46 CF 14 99 CF 9C AF 9E 10 02 BB 2A
Let's try to keep this in perspective, Sam. When there's a text file format
which will display the exploded view drawings in these service documents on
your (Apple ][, Commodore 64, Atari x00, TI 99/4a, TRS-80 Model x, Heathkit
Hx, OSI Challenger x, IMSAI 8080, Altair
>8800, etc) then you may have a valid point. For that matter, aside from
the last three on the list, there's not one likely to need this
documentation, nor is it likely that anyone unable to afford disk space
enough to hold a complete PDF file of one of these relatively short
documents when a 10GB disk drive costs less than $200, will be able to
afford one of the "antique" devices to which they apply.
Aside from all that, I'd speculate that there are more Windows users who die
every day than there are users of computer systems desiring but inherently
unable to view PDF files in the world. Having said that, however, I submit
that the majority should not dictate to the extent that the needs of the
minority are ignored. If you can come up with a format common to both
illustrations and text for the implementation of which a single and
easy-to-use tool set is in the hands of someone(s) willing to process this
set of documents within a reasonable time frame into an appropriately
formatted archive suitable to the yet-to-be-determined provider of web-site
space, it will receive appropriate consideration. Take solace in the fact
that I will not likely be among those making these choices. Since I have
the documents, my preference, at least with respect to them is not
particularly relevant.
Take a look at the "unofficial CP/M web site," whatever the URL is, and
you'll see the document files offered in several formats, though I'd
speculate that none of the systems you listed in your comments, "(Apple ][,
Commodore 64, Atari x00, TI 99/4a, TRS-80 Model x, Heathkit Hx, OSI
Challenger x, IMSAI 8080, Altair 8800, etc)" can view any of those files.
Perhaps you can offer a positive construct rather than simply wringing your
hands and being a naysayer.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Sellam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, June 06, 1999 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: Disk Drive Documents
>On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, Richard Erlacher wrote:
>
>> >Well, I definitely agree with Tony on this.
>>
>> On which point, Sam?
>
>On the point that the archive should be made accessible to as many people
>as possible, and that means using formats and data that just about anyone
>can read.
>
>> Well, I don't, and for the reason that lowest common denominator means
the
>> lowest efficiency for the most people. I want to make it easy and
>> accessible to as many people as possible. Based on statistics, that
means
>> that the only OS that really matters is . . . now say it along with me .
.
>
>Bullshit. There are more tools for viewing ASCII data than any other
>format under every OS. This includes tools that allow you to search and
>edit them. Just because most of the planet is stuck with a Microsoft OS
>doesn't mean that all those people can also use a PDF viewer. I'm on a
>Pentium 133 system and viewing PDF files is a pain in the ass.
>
>It is also the most efficient format in terms of taking up the least
>amount of storage space. I can download a textfile in a few seconds. I
>can even view it with my web browser, and search it. I can cut parts out
>and paste them elsewhere.
>
>Making a
>"public" archive in the sense that everyone should be able to view it
>means catering to the lowest common denominator.
>
>
>> I don't anticipate getting complete agreement from everyone. What has to
be
>> considered is (1) What do the owners of the data have to say? (2) What
are
>> the people willing to do the work willing to do? (3) Where are these
>> documents to be stored and presented to the public and how much space
will
>> they allow for this purpose? (4) What will satisfy the needs and
preferences
>> of MOST of the people having access to the documents? The weight
assigned
>> to the answers will probably be in about this order as well.
>
>What good is putting in all the effort when not many people will be able
>to benefit from that effort? Contrary to what you think, the PDF format
>is not that widespread. Sure there are viewers, and the format is
>documented, but how many people have that plug-in or the stand-alone on
>their computer? Now ask yourself, how many people have a text editor on
>their computer?
>
>> As far as I'm concerned, what's most important is that the documents be
>> stored as complete, separate, and single files. They should not be
broken
>> up into pages or chapters or text in one part and graphics in another in
the
>> stupid, Stupid, STUPID way much of the LINUX documentation is published.
>
>Not everyone with a Linux box has a SVGA monitor with gigabytes of hard
>drive space and oodles of RAM. The developers of the Linux documentation
>were smart enough to realize that. It allows you to get only what you
>need, and not end up with a bunch of dead data taking up precious space on
>your hard drive.
>
>> Further, while GIF format is probably OK for your vacation pictures or
the
>> latest centerfold, I don't find it particularly advantageous for
presenting
>> line-art drawings because common viewers don't have a standard
presentation
>> format for them. They come in a size matched to some raster image and if
>> your display matches it, great, else too bad. Again I prefer the PDF,
not
>> only because it is what most people can get and use for free, but because
it
>> is a single format useable in common for both text and graphics.
>
>I can't view a PDF file with my (Apple ][, Commodore 64, Atari x00, TI
>99/4a, TRS-80 Model x, Heathkit Hx, OSI Challenger x, IMSAI 8080, Altair
>8800, etc).
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
>
> Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 05/25/99]
>
> Hi. In my last visit to a very nice junkyard (near Lisbon,
>Portugal) I came across a box, a bit larger than a DECserver 300,
>named DECmicroserver, having about 4 very large D connectors (3 rows
>of pins) named "line 1" in the back. Anyone knows what it is? (I'm
>really tempted to buy it).
Those D connectors carry synchronous data to and from IBM SNA boxes.
I've seen these set up in medium-sized businesses that had both IBM
networked mainframes/minis and DEC minis that need to talk to each other.
There's a beefier version called the "DEC Channelserver" which, I've
always inferred from the name, hooks to the IBM Channel architecture.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
The "D" refers to the shape and the "B" refers to the shell-size. Hence,
your typical RS-232 cable has a DB-25, indicating a D-connector with a size
B shell with 25 contacts in it. They are further designated 'S' for socket
(female) and 'P' for plug (male), which is not too hard to figure out.
Likewise, the floppy disk cable connector formerly seen on PC FDC's used a
DC37S connector, and what's most often seen on SCSI equipment attached to
SUN systems is a DD50, though I can't remember which sex goes on what. The
smaller serial connector now common on PC's is a DE-9, and the 15-pin
connector used for joystics and MIDI is the DA15. On the other hand, the
VGA connector would be a DE15, though I can't say I've ever seen it called
out that way.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Truman <jack_truman(a)hotmail.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, June 06, 1999 8:22 PM
Subject: i'm confused..
>Hello,
> This is probably a dumb questions, but i'm unsure of what a "D-type
>b-miniature connector" is. I'm trying to connect my PC's serial port to my
>VAXstation 3100, and the H8571-J adapter converts the 6-pin MMJ port to a
>"D-type sub-miniature connector." Is that simply a fancy word for a female
>serial port?
>Thanks in advance. :)
>
>-Jack
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________
>Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
Hello,
This is probably a dumb questions, but i'm unsure of what a "D-type
b-miniature connector" is. I'm trying to connect my PC's serial port to my
VAXstation 3100, and the H8571-J adapter converts the 6-pin MMJ port to a
"D-type sub-miniature connector." Is that simply a fancy word for a female
serial port?
Thanks in advance. :)
-Jack
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>>I'm advocating that any public archive should be accessible to as many
people as possible.
It's fruitless arguments like this disuade other list members from making
their DOCS available. No matter what format is chosen, *someone* will
always be dissatisfied.
I say, use whatever methodology is most convenient for the "publisher". If
another user wants the info bad enough, they'll figure out how to read it!
Just my $.02
Steve Robertson <steverob(a)hotoffice.com>
Hi!
I just picked up a Disney Sound Source (?1983) from a flea market. From
what I know, it's a external sound card that'll play Wav files. Does anyone
have drivers for it??
ThAnX,
///--->>>
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
These aren't S-100 card documents, Sam, they're Disk drive documents, and
they're service documents at that.
A positive construct would be a novel thing to see from you, Sam. You're
against everything, and favor nothing, apparently. Can you name even one
computer from among the ones you listed that has the capability real, not
putative, in both hardware and software, of getting anything from the web?
Those people who choose to use computers unable to handle graphic displays
always have the option of choosing to use a computer capable of doing so.
If they choose not to, it's no different from you choosing your position.
It's their choice which prevents them from having the benefit of an archive
not compatible with the dozen or two others in their group, while readily
accessible to the tens of millions who don't make that choice. They can
always go to the local library if they need. It's like the folks who won't
drive a car, though not as environmentally conscious. They could ride a
bus. They really don't have to walk, and you, Sam, you don't have to sit
and curse the darkness. I invite you to light one candle. Make a
suggestion that would work.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Sellam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, June 07, 1999 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: Disk Drive Documents
>On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, Richard Erlacher wrote:
>
>> Let's try to keep this in perspective, Sam. When there's a text file
>> format which will display the exploded view drawings in these service
>> documents on your (Apple ][, Commodore 64, Atari x00, TI 99/4a, TRS-80
>> Model x, Heathkit Hx, OSI Challenger x, IMSAI 8080, Altair >8800, etc)
>
>You're still missing the point. Some people choose to use computers that
>aren't even PC-based. All they may have availabe is a text-based display
>and a couple disk drives.
>
>You're the one who should keep this in prespective. Since when does all
>documentation reuire an exploded diagram? Why does an S-100 bus card need
>an exploded diagram??
>
>> then you may have a valid point. For that matter, aside from the last
>> three on the list, there's not one likely to need this documentation,
>> nor is it likely that anyone unable to afford disk space enough to
>> hold a complete PDF file of one of these relatively short documents
>> when a 10GB disk drive costs less than $200, will be able to afford
>> one of the "antique" devices to which they apply.
>
>This is a silly argument, but coming from you I'm not surprised.
>
>> Take a look at the "unofficial CP/M web site," whatever the URL is, and
>> you'll see the document files offered in several formats, though I'd
>> speculate that none of the systems you listed in your comments,
"(Apple ][,
>> Commodore 64, Atari x00, TI 99/4a, TRS-80 Model x, Heathkit Hx, OSI
>> Challenger x, IMSAI 8080, Altair 8800, etc)" can view any of those files.
>>
>> Perhaps you can offer a positive construct rather than simply wringing
your
>> hands and being a naysayer.
>
>I'm hardly being a naysayer. I'm advocating that any public archive
>should be accessible to as many people as possible. I'm not forcing you
>to follow my suggestions. I realize that not everyone has a firm grasp on
>common sense.
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
>
> Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 05/25/99]
>
Hi,
On Thu, 13 May 1999 Doug Spence wrote:
> >> As for disk transfers, I can do that with my handy-dandy A1020 drive
> >> on my Amiga. It reads and writes several Atari 8-bit formats just
> >> fine, including 810 (SS/SD) and XF551 (DS/DD?).
> >
> > Hmm have to check that out.
>
> Yes, if your Amiga's 5.25" floppy drive is connected to the Amiga's
> floppy controller, you should be able to do the same thing.
>
> The program for doing this is on aminet:misc/emu/551conv.lha
Talking of the Amiga 1020 drive... I would like to get hold of one of these. Am
I correct in thinking that they were not sold in the UK (where I live)?
If I can't find an A1020 (or compatible replacement, if any were made), I may
try and rig up my own drive.
To this end, can some kind person who owns an A1020 open it up, and tell me
what type/model the drive mechanism is, and also describe any interface PCB
that's inside?
-- Mark
I don't have any Disney games, but I downloaded Sputter and tried it out on
my Zenith SupersPORT (8088). All I could get it to do was make the internal
speaker crackle. I seem to be doing what it says to in the docs (for
Sputter), but can't get it to work. I wouldn't mind having the Windows
drivers, though, since I hope to use the Sound Source on an old 386 laptop
that I have (maybe...)
///--->>>
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
-----Original Message-----
From: John Ruschmeyer <jruschme(a)exit109.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sonntag, 6. Juni 1999 17:31
Subject: Re: Disney Sound Source
>> >I just picked up a Disney Sound Source (?1983) from a flea market. From
>> >what I know, it's a external sound card that'll play Wav files. Does
anyone
>> >have drivers for it??
>>
>> Jason,
>>
>> I think there are drivers for it in Windows 3.1 .
>
>There are Windows 3.1 drivers (I have a copy around here somewhere... just
>hope it's on something readable). Beyond that, I know that some Disney
>games supported it as did the sound utility 'sputter'.
>
><<<john>>>
>
Yeah. Whit a little silver box with a Mickey Mouse Silhouette on it. It
looked similar to the Covox Speech Thing, and connected to the amplifier /
speaker with a RJ-11 jack.
///--->>>
-Jason Willgruber
(roblwill(a)usaor.net)
ICQ#: 1730318
<http://members.tripod.com/general_1>
BTW>> I need drivers for the Covox Speech Thing, too.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Passmore <fpp(a)concentric.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sonntag, 6. Juni 1999 13:15
Subject: Re: Disney Sound Source
>Is this the sound card that attached to the parallel port?
>
>>I just picked up a Disney Sound Source (?1983) from a flea market. From
>>what I know, it's a external sound card that'll play Wav files. Does
>anyone
>>have drivers for it??
>
>
>
Gracias too Tim and Bruce for the answer to my board question.
I have the 16-channel RS232 port assembly that goes on the other
end of this... I just didn't know what it hooked up to.. till now.
What started this was taking an inventory of the 1/44 to see about
fitting an RL11 into it, thus to begin using RL02s.
Of course this rash activity is bound to generate a small flurry
of further perplexities... at least I've got full docs on everything.
Cheerz
John
Also I have Docs on the CS11 if you need to know something
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: John Lawson <jpl15(a)netcom.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, June 06, 1999 9:31 PM
Subject: Emulex Thanx
>
> Gracias too Tim and Bruce for the answer to my board question.
>
> I have the 16-channel RS232 port assembly that goes on the other
>end of this... I just didn't know what it hooked up to.. till now.
>
> What started this was taking an inventory of the 1/44 to see about
>fitting an RL11 into it, thus to begin using RL02s.
>
> Of course this rash activity is bound to generate a small flurry
>of further perplexities... at least I've got full docs on everything.
>
> Cheerz
>
>John
>
>
First of all, let me say that I'm in complete agreement with your notion
that the doc's don't have to be put out in only one format. It's just that
I've been so extremely satisfied (ask anyone who knows me and they'll tell
you that's not easy!) with the PDF for document publication that any other
way simply hadn't arrived here yet.
With the Acrord32 program under Win95, you can print the pages you want and
skip the rest, you can search for specific words and phrases, and you can
print double-sided whether you have a duplex printer or not. You can
generate extremely good-looking documents with almost no effort. You just
can't edit them or such, and that's fine with me. I've seen some truly
terrible PDF documents, obviously scanned from bad source documents or with
a really dirty scanner, and not cleaned up as I'd probably be inclined to do
if any of these documents turned out to be "bad" or difficult to read. The
ones I've seen which were bad were posted PDF's of CP/M documents which I
probably ought to be glad I could get in any form.
What I would like to avoid, here, is getting in a position where we evaluate
the product on the basis of the tools used to generate it. I use WIndows95
because it's a convenient tool for doing what I do with it. I use DOS where
it's convenient and when I see a version of, say, LINUX that's got current
documentation I'll look at it again too, since there are supposed to be some
things that it does very handily as well. I agree about the documentation
angle, but I don't agree that being free makes a product better. It just
improves the price-performance comparison factors and helps with motivation
to try it. I do believe that publishing the scanned documents as completely
as possible is desirable, so that when you run into that "see figure 8a on
page ..." you'll have that as well. If you only need to print sheet 14 of
39, that's what you should be able to print, not the entire document when
all you wanted was the PLL's lowpass filter. PDF allows all that. If we
can get a consensus on other formats, I'm willing. For now, we still need a
"home" for such documents as these. The provider of this site space may
have something to say about format or about how many formats he sees fit to
house.
If this set of doc's can be scanned and put together into a useable form of
PDF document, then I see that as one relatively straightforward solution.
If there were a good PCL or PostScript viewer, widely distributed enough
that a substantial number of potential users would have it at their
disposal, that would also be useful distribution format. If it could be
hammered into a Word97 document, that might be a candidate. What's
important is that a large number of potential users have access to the
format that's chosen.
Comments and suggestions are welcome!
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, June 06, 1999 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: Disk Drive Documents
>> If, ultimately, the decision is made to serve these documents up in
linked
>> form rather than monolithic form, I'd submit that it is still desirable
to
>> be able to download the entire document as a single object. Some
provision
>> for that must be made, and I don't think it's simple.
>>
>> Comments?
>
>Well, of course, nobody is saying that you have to distribute these
>documents in only one format. And in many ways, the original scans (as
>.gif or whatever) are closer to the original documents that something
>that's been modified (OCRed, cleaned up, etc, so IMHO they should be
>available somewhere.
>
>I still think that a .pdf is not the best way to group a number of
>scanned pages together. There are plenty of simpler, better documented,
>solutions for this. Two obvious ones are .zip and .tar.gz . I've used
>many ftp sites that will create one or other of those 'on the fly' - if
>you want to download an entire directory, you can get
><directory_name>.zip (or .tar.gz) and it transfers one file to your
>machine for you to unpack later.
>
>But the ability to get only some pages from a manual I would think would
>be very useful. Most times service manuals contain information that is
>not that useful for a particular repair (things like the original parts
>lists when parts haven't been stocked under those part numbers for at
>least 10 years, things like the exploded diagrams when you have an
>electronic fault, or the schematics when you have a mechanical fault,
>etc). I don't like wasting network bandwidth if I can avoid it.
>
>
>
>>
>> Dick
>
>-tony
>
I have an Emulex CS1110201-U2D card in my 11/44 system, that
despite my best efforts at due diligence, I cannot find a reference
or any other data regearding it.
The other numbers on the label associated with the part number are
3997H and 4372A, and along the top it has a number of PROMS marked
300J thru 311J. It is hex-height and has a single Berg header with
a ribbon cable and 34-pin connector. The connector is marked with
the number CU1111201-02 B.
If anyone recognizes this I would like to know 'whuzzit'?
Cheers
John
COWABUNGA!!
My beautiful new GRiD Compass is now online!
The keyboard seems to need a little bit of cleaning or working-in,
sometimes keypresses don't register.
This thing automatically loads up a VT100 emulator when I turn it on.
Does anyone know anything about GRiD-OS? I think it was version
3.something. I'll verify that later.
I'm just SOOO happy that the Compass works! I'v been wanting to at least
_see_ one in operation since I first read the review in... I'm not
sure... January 1984 Creative Computing? (No, I think that was the
Gavilan.)
I'm going to have to poke around some more. I just wanted to dial in with
the thing and make this announcement. :) (It's hard to find a provider
that will accept a 1200bps conection these days, huh?)
So... GPIB is the same as IEEE-488? Anyone got an adapter cable for
GRiD-to-CBM? :)
YES!! Plasma display AND bubble memory in ONE machine!
--
Doug Spence
ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
> I have an Emulex CS1110201-U2D card in my 11/44 system, that
>despite my best efforts at due diligence, I cannot find a reference
>or any other data regearding it.
> If anyone recognizes this I would like to know 'whuzzit'?
This is (surprise) an Emulex CS11. It emulates a DH11 async multiplexer,
with some bells and whistles like modem control if you use the right cab
kit. The magic for this series of Emulex cards is in the cab kit,
as there's a fair amount of logic that lives there. Do you have the
cab kit?
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, James Szajda wrote:
> If you are still the person to contact, I am looking for a boot disk for
> a Victor 9000 system. Any help you can give me will be appreciated.
For many machines I am, James. Unfortunately, the Victor 9000 is not one
of them. The problem is that the 9000, or Sirius, uses a very unusual
format on its disks. They are both Group Code Recording formatted and
also done on a variable speed drive. Essentially, the only person who can
provide you with a boot disk is someone who owns one that is in working
condition.
I will post this to the Classic Computer mailing list and see if it
generates any response to you. In the meantime, it might serve you well
to post a query on comp.os.cpm and see if that gets a response.
Wish I could do more.
- don
donm(a)cts.com
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Don Maslin - Keeper of the Dina-SIG CP/M System Disk Archives
Chairman, Dina-SIG of the San Diego Computer Society
Clinging tenaciously to the trailing edge of technology.
Sysop - Elephant's Graveyard (CP/M) Z-Node 9 - 619-454-8412
*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
see old system support at http://www.psyber.com/~tcj/
visit the "Unofficial" CP/M Web site at http://www.devili.iki.fi/cpm/
with Mirror at http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/~cfs/cpm/
Is this the sound card that attached to the parallel port?
>I just picked up a Disney Sound Source (?1983) from a flea market. From
>what I know, it's a external sound card that'll play Wav files. Does
anyone
>have drivers for it??
I've observed that many text documents are formatted in HTML rather than
PDF, and have links to seaparate files for the graphic segments. The
manuals do have considerable text in them, which might benefit from OCR and
re-creation and re-editing of the manuals with only the scanned graphics as
original files. Even some of the schematic segments might be better
re-created due to the fine line pitch, which tends to become really ugly in
scanned documents.
I use Typemaster Pro, which is quite old, but very effective at isolating
graphics from text and perhaps well suited for segregating the text sections
>from the illustrations. It's been around since about 10 years ago when
nothing else would touch it. My scanner is a 300 DPI monochrome (but legal
size) scanner with a sheetfeeder (which I wish would work properly). In
conjuction with this old scanner, the software has done multipage scans to
text of large documents in almost as little time as it takes to read them.
It manages to learn the fonts and handles two typefaces with serifs at the
same time as two without. If your document has more than that, you're on
your own, of course, but it does a nice job, particularly with handling text
which is flowed around some graphics, which it recognizes and leaves
undisturbed.
If, ultimately, the decision is made to serve these documents up in linked
form rather than monolithic form, I'd submit that it is still desirable to
be able to download the entire document as a single object. Some provision
for that must be made, and I don't think it's simple.
Comments?
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, June 06, 1999 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Disk Drive Documents
>[Wonderful list of docs snipped]
>
>> If this stuff is worth preserving, perhaps there's a way to save scanned
>> images for eventual conversion to PDF. Does anyone know about this?
>
>In my opinion, PDF files are not really appropriate for scanned documents
>(they _may_ be more use for documents that are initially created and
>distributed in this format). For one (selfish) thing, I've yet to find a
>useable way to print these out on any of my machines.
>
>The best way I've seen so far for this is simply to put a directory of
>suitable graphics files on an ftp site (.gif seems to compress quite well
>- 17"*11" circuit diagrams scanned at 300dpi are around 300K) and provide
>a text file describing each page (not just as 'page 7 of the ST506 service
>manual' but something like 'page 7 -- Page 1 of 3 of the schematic').
>
>That way, people can download just what they want (if you need a
>schematic, you don't waste time downloading parts lists as well). And the
>result is portable to a lot more systems.
>
>If there are substantial text areas in the manual it may be worth trying
>to OCR it to a plain ASCII file.
>
>-tony
>
--- Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Interesting. This is the first time I've heard of a 16 sector RK05f pack
> (not too suprised that one existed...)
>
> I am told that you couldn't reliably move RK05f packs between drives.
> Heck, you were supposed to reformat the pack (according to one of the
> manuals) if you took it out and put it back in again.
Bummer. I've always wondered what's on this thing. I may never know. :-(
-ethan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>Tim Shoppa just noted that V5.7 of RT-11 allows an RX50 floppy drive
>to FORMAT under RT-11, but I am not aware if that is for EVERY
>RX50 floppy drive, OR ONLY the special ones that have been noted
>as being able to do a FORMAT on a Rainbow. Either you (Allison)
>or Megan Gentry or someone else mentioned that recently. And I
>don't know if all RQDX1,2,3 are included.
I've not yet tried formatting an RX50 with V5.7, but I suspect that
it requires 1) an RX33 drive and 2) an RQDX3 (though maybe even the
RQZX1 will work - I'll have to defer to Tim on this).
When I was working on V5.6, the best we could do was format RX33s on
an RX33 drive... if you attemped to format an RX50 on an RX33 drive,
you got an RX33-formatted RX50 which was neither 1) usable or
2) reformattable to RX50.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
By the way . . . it might be desirable to find an appropriate site on which
to post this stuff for general use. Where's the most appropriate site?
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, June 06, 1999 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: Disk Drive Documents
>Perhaps that will be the way to make these items available to those who
need
>them. I've had several requests for one or another of these documents in
>recent weeks. This may turn out to be somewhat of a headache, as some,
e.g.
>the SIEMENS documents, are still in the form of a booklet, and, having been
>wet at one point or another, it may be desirable to scan them and reduce
>them to text as opposed, simply, to preserving the graphic images. This
>will mean the graphics need to be repaired in some way as well.
>
>Apparently, as people try to resurrect their ancient computing hardware,
>they find some of it is in need of maintenance. Mine certainly has turned
>out that way.
>
>Dick
>-----Original Message-----
>From: emanuel stiebler <emu(a)ecubics.com>
>To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
><classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
>Date: Sunday, June 06, 1999 7:09 AM
>Subject: Re: Disk Drive Documents
>
>
>>Hi Dick,
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>>To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
>><classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
>>Date: Saturday, June 05, 1999 11:55 PM
>>Subject: Disk Drive Documents
>>
>>
>>>If this stuff is worth preserving, perhaps there's a way to save scanned
>>>images for eventual conversion to PDF. Does anyone know about this?
>>
>>
>>Send it to me, if you like. We should have all the tools needed in house.
>>
>>cheers,
>>emanuel
>>
>>
>
Several of these documents have very detailed graphics (line-art, mostly)
which may or may not scan well. I would not like to have to re-create the
exploded view assembly drawings. Though I have a scanner and some really
quite excellent OCR software, I've never been able to deal well with highly
detailed line art. The typical FAX scanner at 100x100 pixels per inch would
not render these drawings in any useable form. Even at 200x100, which is
the best I've ever gotten from a FAX.
Emanuel Stiebler has offered to handle this with tools he has in house.
I'll see what he and I can work up, as he and I live in the same geographic
area.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Innfogra(a)aol.com <Innfogra(a)aol.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, June 06, 1999 1:48 AM
Subject: Re: Disk Drive Documents
>
>> If this stuff is worth preserving, perhaps there's a way to save scanned
>> images for eventual conversion to PDF. Does anyone know about this?
>
>They are definitely worth saving. Many people don't have access to these.
>
>Fax the pages to your computer with a regular fax machine. The full version
>of Acrobat will convert many fax images to PDF. I know there are several
>other programs that will convert too, but I am not sure of their names. I
>have an old DOS program called Hijaak Pro that converted between many
vector,
>raster and fax file formats. I looked and it is a pre-PDF program.
>Paxton
Perhaps that will be the way to make these items available to those who need
them. I've had several requests for one or another of these documents in
recent weeks. This may turn out to be somewhat of a headache, as some, e.g.
the SIEMENS documents, are still in the form of a booklet, and, having been
wet at one point or another, it may be desirable to scan them and reduce
them to text as opposed, simply, to preserving the graphic images. This
will mean the graphics need to be repaired in some way as well.
Apparently, as people try to resurrect their ancient computing hardware,
they find some of it is in need of maintenance. Mine certainly has turned
out that way.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: emanuel stiebler <emu(a)ecubics.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, June 06, 1999 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: Disk Drive Documents
>Hi Dick,
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
><classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
>Date: Saturday, June 05, 1999 11:55 PM
>Subject: Disk Drive Documents
>
>
>>If this stuff is worth preserving, perhaps there's a way to save scanned
>>images for eventual conversion to PDF. Does anyone know about this?
>
>
>Send it to me, if you like. We should have all the tools needed in house.
>
>cheers,
>emanuel
>
>
>>RX50 formatting under RT-11 V5.7 (i.e. FORMAT/SINGLE DUn:) only is
>>supported on certain 3rd-party controllers like the Andromeda ESDC and
>>SCDC. It doesn't work with RQDX1/2/3's.
>Regarding my prior message, I stand corrected...
Well, in *this* particular case, Mentec arranged for Andromeda to
give me a SCDC controller with some SCSI drives and 5.25" and 3.5" floppies,
and that's the reason why the Andromeda is supported for this operation
under RT-11 5.7 :-).
>But even though an RQDX3 is not required (or useful) for this, I'll
>suspect an RX33-type drive still is. Is that correct, Tim?
Not necessarily. I just hooked a true DEC RX50 to my SCDC, configured
it, and it still lets me do a RX50 format:
SCDC User Service Port V3.06
B Configure controller HARDWARE JUMPERS
D Display/define physical DRIVE PARAMETERS
A Assign logical DU/MU UNITS
C Configure controller SOFTWARE OPTIONS
E Exercise a SCSI DISK drive
F FORMAT a DISK drive
P RESET controller and EXIT
? d
SCSI or Floppy (S or F)? f
Floppy drive number (0 or 1)? 0
Floppy drive 0: 800 blocks
Floppy drive types:
76 3.5" 80 track DS
134 5.25" 80 track DS
420 DEC RX50 dual drive
Floppy drive type (76, 134, or 420) [134]? 420
SCSI or Floppy (S or F)?
SAVE CHANGES- Are you sure (Y or N) [N]? y
SCDC User Service Port V3.06
B Configure controller HARDWARE JUMPERS
D Display/define physical DRIVE PARAMETERS
A Assign logical DU/MU UNITS
C Configure controller SOFTWARE OPTIONS
E Exercise a SCSI DISK drive
F FORMAT a DISK drive
P RESET controller and EXIT
? f
SCSI or Floppy (S or F)? f
Floppy drive number (0 or 1)? 0
Floppy drive 0: (offline)
Available floppy formats:
DD 800 blocks
Which format (# of blocks)?
Now whether you want to actually do the format on a DEC RX50 drive is
another question. According to Charles Lasner's voluminous posts on RX50
technical details, RX50 drives lack the required physical head-positioning
accuracy to make a RX50 floppy that's guaranteed to be interchangable with
other drives. Look at Charles's posts to alt.sys.pdp8 on the topic
>from 4-5 years ago for more details about his tests.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Hi Dick,
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Saturday, June 05, 1999 11:55 PM
Subject: Disk Drive Documents
>If this stuff is worth preserving, perhaps there's a way to save scanned
>images for eventual conversion to PDF. Does anyone know about this?
Send it to me, if you like. We should have all the tools needed in house.
cheers,
emanuel
> If this stuff is worth preserving, perhaps there's a way to save scanned
> images for eventual conversion to PDF. Does anyone know about this?
They are definitely worth saving. Many people don't have access to these.
Fax the pages to your computer with a regular fax machine. The full version
of Acrobat will convert many fax images to PDF. I know there are several
other programs that will convert too, but I am not sure of their names. I
have an old DOS program called Hijaak Pro that converted between many vector,
raster and fax file formats. I looked and it is a pre-PDF program.
Paxton
Hi!
I just started an auction on Ebay for Nicolet
Model 824 plotter. Item # 113397200, closes
6/14/99.
I'd like to add some specs to the description.
Can anyone fill me in on this oldie? It accepts
24 inch paper and emulates HP7475; that's about
the extent of my knowledge. Direct e-mail replies
appreciated. Thanks.
Dan S., Laurel, MD.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>RX50 formatting under RT-11 V5.7 (i.e. FORMAT/SINGLE DUn:) only is
>supported on certain 3rd-party controllers like the Andromeda ESDC and
>SCDC. It doesn't work with RQDX1/2/3's.
Regarding my prior message, I stand corrected...
But even though an RQDX3 is not required (or useful) for this, I'll
suspect an RX33-type drive still is. Is that correct, Tim?
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Hello
I have 2 Kaypro II machines (were working when retired to attic about 10 yrs
ago) and a Kaypro LQ Printer; do you know of any market for these or of any
people anywhere in the world (missionaries, 3rd world schools, etc) that could
use these reliable if outdated by internet standards machines?
It seems a shame that these could be not be used by someone who can't afford
or need to get into the current technology mode. Please send me any leads
you may have.
Dr. Bill O'Brien
obrien(a)southwestern.edu
FAX 512 863 1696
11403 Randy Drive Austin, Texas 78726
>Tim Shoppa just noted that V5.7 of RT-11 allows an RX50 floppy drive
>to FORMAT under RT-11, but I am not aware if that is for EVERY
>RX50 floppy drive.
RX50 formatting under RT-11 V5.7 (i.e. FORMAT/SINGLE DUn:) only is
supported on certain 3rd-party controllers like the Andromeda ESDC and
SCDC. It doesn't work with RQDX1/2/3's.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>Allison J Parent wrote:
> <Believe it or not, it is possible to FORMAT an RX33 floppy under RT-11!
> <Just a little side note which has nothing to do with the original question
> <Also, you can't FORMAT an RX50 under RT-11 and it is much easier to
> <FORMAT the RX50 floppy on a PC. Shout if you want instructions how!
>
> Both would handy to know as doing it under xxdp is terminally slow.
Jerome Fine replies:
<> <How can I format a rd54 disk on a rt11 5.3 ?
<> You cannot unless you write your own utility.
<
<Jerome Fine replies:
<
<For novice PDP-11 folk, this part is incorrect, as Allison
<surely knows, but probably just answered too quickly.
<Technically, I suppose Allison is correct, but I have
<never heard of anyone writing their own version of ZRQC??
No, I am correct. there is no formatter for RDxx drives under RT-11.
XXDP does it really well but that is NOT RT-ll.
There is a lot of work but writing a utility to format a RD under
RT-11 is possible, though if you have the tools and info to do that
you also know XXDP is available.
<Just a note of clarification (again, Allison this is not a flame that you u
<but just correcting your "spelling" - anyone who knows realizes and anyone
<who doesn't understand - it doesn't matter). Allison was referring to the
<SET DUn: UNIT=u, PART=p
Actually I've never used a RD larger than 31mb on an RT11 system so the
SET DUn would not have come to mind. Why no big disks? I have MANY
MANY RD52s and an RD53/54 would be VAX fodder.
Also while RQDX3s are RD54 aware, some of the RQDX1 and 2s are very much
unaware of the RD54 and will produce errors.
Allison
I picked up a couple of Compupros that were used in a Titan missile test
station. Each one has a Compupro 286 CPU, 64^H^H 128 K S-RAM card, EPROM
card, system support card and Interfacer 4 card along with a number of
custom cards. The operating system for them is in EPROM. These were used to
operate a ultrasonic test machine by remote control. Each test stand had a
turntable and gantry that would rotate the missile and run the test head up
and down until it inspected the entire missile body. Each test head had
four large ultrasonic transducers for detecting flaws in the missile. These
computers generated the master timing for the ultra sonic pulses and
converted the return signals from analog to digital then fed the data back
to another computer for further processing. They could be operated at up to
200 MHz PRF. They also took care of things like controlling the
programmable attenuators in the RF receiver. Most of the connectors on them
were replaced with "Canon plugs" and an extra power supply added for use by
one of the special cards. An extra fan was also added inside. All of the
custom cards use gold SMA connectors to connect to each other and to carry
the RF signals. The custom cards have some really neat devices on them such
as flash A/D converters, very fast S-RAM for buffers, switchable
attenuators, a crystal with 10-7 accuaracy, etc.
I was going to convert these back to standard Compupro configuration but
if anyone is seriously interested in them I will consider interesting
trades or $$.
PS I have lots of manuals for them too including schematics and theory
of operation for the custom cards.
I dropped by my old place of work yesterday, lugging my GRiDs and
Toshiba laptop (and I'm still in pain).
The accountant has a laptop that he wanted me to look at. It looks to me
like there's nothing wrong with it except a dead CMOS battery.
How do I get into the setup of an Epson Equity LT-286? And what kind of
battery does it need?
I tried most of the usual setup suspects. Does it require a setup progam
on floppy? It was a 2nd hand machine and the owner doesn't have any disks
for it or manuals (just the machine, power supply, and nice carrying
case).
--
Doug Spence
ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
http://alcor.concordia.ca/~ds_spenc/
On Jun 4, 23:31, Tony Duell wrote:
> I've had many tantalum capacitors catch fire over the years. They're
> pretty spectacular (and smell horrible :-(), but they rarely do any more
> damage.
>
> They seem to go low resistance both ways round (rather than becoming a
> diode), and pass enough current to overheat. Then the burst and spray
> burning bits out...
>
> I have never found a cause of this. I've had several boards that have
> been working fine when put away, but when I pull the out of storage and
> try them, the capacitors go up. They had a sufficiently high voltage
> rating for the position, etc.
> I don't think it happens to protect anything. The capacitor fails _at the
> normal operating voltage_.
Yes, I've seen several fail that way too. The most recent:
A few months ago, we had a "fire" in our machine room over the weekend,
which caused the systems to be automatically shut down. It turned out that
one tantalum cap in one of the PSUs on our 32-processor Origin2000 server
had burned up, the smoke detectors had been tripped, and the rest was
obvious. When the power was restored, everything came back up as normal.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Oh, you mean my father?
P Manney
"Y1K caused the Dark Ages."
Thousands of discounted photo items at http://www.hmcltd.net/pgphoto
>Are you trading (or trying to) your identity for Henry Manney who
>wrote of exotic motorcars and sportscar racing in Europe more years ago
>than I like to acknowledge?
<Sorry, no external cases and I don't know what they are. These are specifi
<to 220v 50hz.
<I thought S100 style machines had drives with 12v connectors.
These are older drives like the sugart sa800/850 series with line powered ac
motors for the spindles. the rest of the hardware uses typically +24v, +5
and -5v. The later drives were DC motor spindles and very different.
The ones you've found might fit a Heath H8/H11 early 8"disk system or an
older altair/imsai 8" system. that of course is not an exclusive list.
Allison
--- Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Originally, I wrote:
> > The only use I would have for an RK05F is to read this _one_ 16-sector pack
> Isn't the RK05F the fixed-pack version (i.e. the pack was designed to be
> changed during repair operations, and not in normal use).
Yes.
> In which case it's not the best choice for reading a normal pack. The RK05j
> (the other drive he mentioned) could read the pack, but not with a PDP11
> controller (which expects 12 sector packs).
I did not mistype. I have a 16-sector RK05F pack. It was in the drive when
my former employer bought it c. 1982 from Ohio State University surplus before
I worked there. The tech guys removed the F pack and used the RK05J and RJ05F
in the rack with an RK-11C (which I have somewhere). I got the pack off the
shelf in 1984. I have never owned an RK8E, nor a working RK05F, but I do have
at least one working RK05J (one's in the basement, almost certainly working,
attached to an RKV11D, the other is in the shed and is of dubious value).
> Was there ever a 16 sector version of the RK05f? All the ones I've seen
> were 12 sector.
The drive doesn't care except for number of tracks and magnetic gap (the
F heads and J heads are different). The boards are the same (there are
jumpers to select modes of operation). The controllers are the parts that
care how many sectors of how many bytes there are.
So... can *anyone* out there read a 16-sector RK05F pack? I have no use
for it since. as I said, I have no RK8E nor working drive.
-ethan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Jay West <jlwest(a)tseinc.com> wrote:
> I would be very interested in the 11/34 rack with the two RK05's, and the
> ASR33.
The only use I would have for an RK05F is to read this _one_ 16-sector pack
that I've had for 15 years and never owned the equipment to read it on (The
drive died with a different pack in it before I got it).
I already have an ASR33 (two, in fact, one with 20mA and one with a data set),
so that's not a part I want.
> I have no interest in the 11/84, and while I am somewhat interested in the
> 8i, I already have an 8E so I should take a back seat to anyone who doesn't
> have an 8.
As I said before, I have 8's, but not any pre-OMNIBUS mass-storage devices.
Presently, my -8/i has 4Kw, but I have all the parts to take it up to 8Kw.
> I'm in Missouri, so Iowa wouldn't be that big of a deal for me.
Indeed.
> I would be willing to tandem up with others and take a hand in getting the
> equipment and splitting it up with other collectors. If anyone wants to get
> together on this, just let me know.
Perhaps we could build an across-the-country rescue tour? If several people
chip in together on the transport (based on a combination of distance and
percentage of material benefit), it might be possible to move that kind of
mass for less than megabucks.
-ethan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
A friend of mine locally has happened across a PDP-8L in unknown shape. He
wants to sell it on eOverpay. I wish to prevent this. To do so, I need to
present to him a reasonable price that he can sell it at. The last -8/L
I got was a rescue. The one before that was $200 in a 6' rack with high-speed
paper tape and 12Kw of core (plays papertape Star Trek beautifully ;-)
I have no idea what to tell him. He is a geek, but has no interest in
preserving history. He just wants the money. Can anyone here cough up
a reasonable estimate of what a PDP-8/L is worth? I realize that it's a
tough question, but if I don't have an answer, some core-collecting weenie
is probably going to have a trophy to nail to the wall.
If it's worth more than I'm willing to pay, I'll gladly help anyone on this
list with aquiring it. The machine is located in north-central Ohio, but
the owner drives to work in Columbus every day.
-ethan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Hello, I have a VAXstation 4000 VLC with 24mb RAM, no HD and by itself for
sell or trade. I found some basic specs on it and it maxs out at 24mb and all
six RAM slots are filled. It is very clean and powers up OK - that's all I
can check. Please respond directly to mtpro(a)aol.com and thanks! Best,
David Greelish
Classic Computing Press
www.classiccomputing.com
>>Alternatively, if you have a VS2000, it has a RQDX3-compabitle
>> formatter built into it.
>I just formatted the disk in a MVII with the diagnostic tape.
Or - maybe you didn't :-(. The MVII diagnostics are worse than useless.
>>What error message do you get when you try DIR DU0: ? If it's a
>>"?DIR-F-Error reading directory",
>I still get this one ...
Then you didn't format the RD54 successfully. The best you can hope
for with the MVII diagnostics is to turn an already formatted RD54
into a formatted RD54. The worst that can happen is that you
lose an already existing format.
Let me know what media it'd be useful to you on, and I'll get you a
bootable XXDP disk/pack/cart/tape with ZRQC?? on it.
>.INIT Du0:
>DU0: Initialize are you sure ?Y
>?DUP-F-Size function failed
Yep - you need to really reformat the disk, as opposed to what the MVII
diagnosics do. And congratulations on actually posting the command
you used and the error message that resulted!! If only everyone else
on the list could do the same, it'd be a much nicer world!!
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
>Also, you can't FORMAT an RX50 under RT-11 and it is much easier to
>FORMAT the RX50 floppy on a PC.
So you might believe, until you read the minutae about RX50 formatting
support in the RT-11 5.7 release notes :-). I most certainly have
formatted RX50's under RT-11 5.7...
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
I have a SCSI card I was given and I'd like to find data or info
to use them. There is no question they are SCSI from the chips and
connectors.
The boards appear to be MTI QTS25 (viking marked on one Eprom). Standard
dual height dual width.
I'm hoping they are MSCP as I play to try them.
Allison