On Mar 12, 19:09, Aaron Christopher Finney wrote:
> No extra cable...but I do have the RS422 standard pinout handy, this is
> the one I used to make my null-modem cable:
>
> Pin Function
> ------------------
> 1 handshake out (DTR?)
> 2 handshake in (RTS?)
> 3 TD-
> 4 GND
> 5 RD-
> 6 TD+
> 7 GPinput (carrier detect)
> 8 RD+
Almost right -- pin 2 is CTS not RTS:
Pin Function
------------------
1 HSKo (DTR)
2 HSKi (CTS)
3 TxD-
4 GND
5 RxD-
6 TxD+
7 GPi (DCD)
8 RxD+
For a Mac-to-Newton cable, the interconnections are:
Ground (4) -> Ground (4) (also connect to connectors' shrouds)
Transmit+ (6) -> Receive+ (8)
Transmit- (3) -> Receive- (5)
Receive+ (8) -> Transmit+ (6)
Receive- (5) -> Transmit- (3)
Data Term Ready (1) -> Clear To Send (2)
Clear To Send (2) -> Data Term Ready (1)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
More stuff from this guy is available. Please reply directly to the
sender.
Reply-to: 3web(a)netscape.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 12 Mar 00 19:57:28 MST
From: Walter Brown <3web(a)netscape.net>
Subject: Re: [Re: C-64]
Hi, Sellam,
Thanks, loads. I have received 4 replies and can probably find a home for my
c-64 stuff. I also have a Radio Shack 286 (Tandy 1000 TL/3) with internal hard
drive, 3-1/4 and 5-1/2 floppy drives, monitor, Deskmate O/S with disks, DOS
disks, manuals, magazines (many issues of DOS Resource Guide) and (I thought)
a printer, altho I don't see the printer at this moment. Will donate to anyone
paying the postage. If you wouldn't mind posting this also, I would appreciate
it very much.
Is there anything I can do for you? I am located in Denver, Co.
Thanks again for your help.
Walt
Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
VCF Europe: April 29th & 30th, Munich, Germany
VCF Los Angeles: Summer 2000 (*TENTATIVE*)
VCF East: Planning in Progress
See http://www.vintage.org for details!
I was doing a little snooping a while back & I came across a computer called
the Icom Attache. It sounded like an intresting computer, unfortunately, I
can't find anything about it! What is it? Is it an OEM-ed Otrona Attache, a
regular PC-Compatible laptop, or is it something completely different?
____________________________________________________________
David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
Computer Collection:
"Triumph": Commodore 64C, 1802, 1541, FSD-1, GeoRAM 512, Okimate 20.
"Leela": Macintosh 128 (Plus upgrade), Nova SCSI HDD, Imagewriter II.
"Delorean": TI-99/4A.
"Monolith": Apple Macintosh Portable.
"Spectrum": Tandy Color Computer 3.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<The H780 supply is about 3 inches wide IIRC and mounts beside the card cage
<That would make it a couple inches wider than the TU58EX.
<Dan
More like 5" when you add casing. I have a 780+backplane.
The Rackmount BA11-M is 3.5h x 19w x 18.5d (the depth is possibly
inaccurate) The destop version is a little larger for prettyness.
The BA11-VA 3.5h x 13w x 13.5d
the H780 ps alone 5.5"W3.3hx14.625L
The BA11M however will take a lot more cards though but is very noisy.
Allison
Megan wrote:
> Unfortunately, it appears that those who advocate and write in C
> and other such structured languages appear to have lost the ability
> to comment their code (at least it seems that way from all the code
> I look at at work -- I would say a mere 5% is really commented).
>
> They appear to assume that C code is itself sufficient commenting...
>
> It doesn't work.
This may well be true, but C programmers are not the only offenders. The
worst period of my career was converting COBOL gorilla-code to C. The
unstructured, uncommented COBOL code was in some cases so indecipherable that
I simply dug out the original spec and threw the COBOL away. Unfortunately,
this wasn't always possible . . .
I myself heavily comment my C code, since I have to maintain it and can't
always rely on my failing memory ;>)
Glen Goodwin
0/0
At the Hara Arena in Dayton, there are three events per year that relate to
this list: the Hamfest in May and the Computerfest in March and August. I
only went Sunday this year as opposed to my traditional Saturday. Since I
didn't go for modern PC parts, I found the selection to be sparser than ever.
Scattered throughout the back rooms there were the piles of $3 to $5 boards
of various vintages. I did manage to get a pair of DEC-Tulip-chipset 10/100
cards for $3 each and a wad of Microchannel boards (Ethernet and SCSI) for
someone else in a $15 "all you can stuff bag".
Besides a few cards, the only interesting thing I picked up was an Apple
QuickTake 150 digital camera with external battery pack and PSU for $35.
One drawback: it came with a PC cable (DIN-8 to DE-9) and I only have the
Mac software. The Mac cable is typically grey with an icon molded into
both ends of a pair of arrows pointing opposite directions and a stretched
"S" line between them indicating that it's a crossover cable. I do have the
pinouts for the camera, but if I were to make a cable, I'm not sure what all
the matchups are for RS-422. The Apple Technote pages show how to make a PC
cable, but that's the one I already have.
So... does anyone out there have a Mac "null-modem" cable they'd like to get
rid of? Alternately, does anyone have the PC software? It's for Win3.1, but
at least I'd be able to dump the camera.
Thanks,
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
><The BA11-MA's supply looks to have a smaller footprint than the BA11-V. As
><best as I can tell from the fiche. I do know the -MA's are physically
clos
><to a dual TU58EX. At most a couple inches larger.
>
>The footprint of the MA has to be larger or its taller. The quad backplane
>is the size of the BA11VA! If you have the quad wide backplane then the
>power supply will cube out the BA11-VA case. I'm looking at the VA as I
>write. and the dual wide backplane fills half the case and the PS is the
>other half.
The H780 supply is about 3 inches wide IIRC and mounts beside the card cage.
That would make it a couple inches wider than the TU58EX.
Dan
The local Saint Paul Pioneer Press is running a story about my computer collection in this Monday's Tech Section of the paper. I spent two parts of two days with the reporter and another day getting my picture taken with a few items from the collection. I will try and scan it in and put it on my web site as soon as I get it up. Had a very good weekend and will writing up my finds on Monday.
Hi,
Well for what it's worth, IBM still offers a bunch of random ancient manuals
through the POS (publication ordering system), at
http://www.elink.ibmlink.ibm.com/public/applications/publications/cgibin/pb…
That's one nasty address, isn't it? ;p Anyway, I was searching around in
there, and among other things, I ordered "IBM 360 model 67 functional
characteristics" (GA27-2719). I'm going to call other vendors when I have
time, I wanna see if I can get some 470 manuals from Amdahl, for instance.
Unfortunately, I can't find the rest of the docs I need for my 8100's or for
DPPX/SP, odd that I can't get manuals less than 20 years old but can get 360
manuals... Also, I know this will interest some of the list; assorted card
punch manuals are available too.
Will J
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<The BA11-MA's supply looks to have a smaller footprint than the BA11-V. As
<best as I can tell from the fiche. I do know the -MA's are physically clos
<to a dual TU58EX. At most a couple inches larger.
The footprint of the MA has to be larger or its taller. The quad backplane
is the size of the BA11VA! If you have the quad wide backplane then the
power supply will cube out the BA11-VA case. I'm looking at the VA as I
write. and the dual wide backplane fills half the case and the PS is the
other half.
Allison
ALSO, the unit is VERY under powered. The DEC specs say only 16 amps
<> on the 5 volts which also includes the video interface and the AVO optio
<> if you want a full screen 132 character display. I suggest that if you u
<> a Quad 11/73 with the RQDX3, you are probably OK. But not much else.
<
<I no longer need 132 columns to be fulfilled, so the AVO can be omitted.
The AVO option really doesn't draw that much power and in the overall
scheme it's far from enough.
<I'd be attempting a dual 11/73, NS 256Kb, Sigma DLV11, and CMD 220 TM SCSI.
<that doesn't work, I'll try taking out the DL and memory and using an MXV11
<though I recall those only have 32Kb or 128kb, which would make it pretty
<difficult to run RSTS/E.
That should work but the disks will have to be in their own box with their
own power. There isn't enough power there for most disks.
<Good advice for _any_ qbus system. I learned that the hard way, running 4-
<SCSI devices (2 sets mirrored) in a BA23 chassis, and wondering about the
<mysterious lockups. External drive chassis eliminated those, though cable
<lengths became very critical.
I'd limit that comment to ba23. My BA11S 11/73 has a full bus and powers
floppy and two RD52s off a custom harness.
<What I'm really hoping for is what was I think called a BA23-SE or BA11-SE
<'twas a desktop 4-slot enclosure, maybe even 4x2?
You thinking of BA11-VA, dual width by four slots, 4"x13x12 roughly.
That would work but you still need an external disk box. I have several
of those with 11/2, 11/23 cpus. The larger of them is 11/23, 256k, dlv11j,
MRV11B(tu58 boot).
There never was a ba23SE that small as the BA23 was one size (about 5
different backplane and front button combos.
Allison
A friend was cleaning out his garage this weekend and
came up with a few boxes of manuals (no software, alas)
that may be of some interest here. The manuals are free
(you pay postage) but I would like to entertain trades
for other documentation, where possible. Of course, I'll
simply accept "karma points" for later use if you don't
have anything tasty right now <g> (but I do have a good
memory...)
Contact me off-list to make arrangements. First-come
first served. Decision of the judges is final. No refunds.
Some segments may be missing.
The list can be found at:
http://www.ao.com/~go/doclist.txt
Briefly the list includes a set of RT-11 V5 orange binders,
some VT100 docs, some Emulex docs, some TSX-11 manuals
and some miscellany. (Miscellany includes a "service manual"
for an Osborne computer - I *think* Osborne 1.)
As I said, there is ONLY documentation - no software (I guess
I was too late in asking...) But at least these got saved.
If you have trouble accessing this site, let me know and I'll
email a copy of the two lists.
I've also posted my "want list" under
http://www.ao.com/~go/wantlist.txt
-Gary
>> > I think what you are looking for is the BA11-MA. Desktop 4 slot Qbus
the
>> > same approx. size as a dual TU58.
>>
>> I thought that was the BA11-VA? That's what mine say on them anyway,
>
>Yes, I thought it was the BA11-V as well.
>
>> and yeah they look very much like a TU58, but with a 4x2 18-bit
backplane.
OK you got my curiosity up as I was going by my memory. I just looked both
the BA11-V and the BA11-MA up in the microfiche as I sold the last BA11-MA I
had 6 to 9 months ago. The -MA is a quad wide, 4 slot card cage (H9270A
backplane with the H780A power supply) -MA is 115v and -MB is 230v The
other variants are -ME 115v, -MF 230v, -MH 115v w/ no logo, -MJ 230v w/ no
logo.
The BA11-V is dual wide 4 slot card cage with the H9281BA backplane. I have
not had one of these but I have had several of the -MA's.
The BA11-MA's supply looks to have a smaller footprint than the BA11-V. As
best as I can tell from the fiche. I do know the -MA's are physically close
to a dual TU58EX. At most a couple inches larger.
Dan
>I'd be attempting a dual 11/73, NS 256Kb, Sigma DLV11, and CMD 220 TM SCSI.
If
>that doesn't work, I'll try taking out the DL and memory and using an
MXV11,
>though I recall those only have 32Kb or 128kb, which would make it pretty
>difficult to run RSTS/E.
The MXV11 has 8K for the -AA and 32K for the -AC.
>What I'm really hoping for is what was I think called a BA23-SE or BA11-SE,
>'twas a desktop 4-slot enclosure, maybe even 4x2?
I think what you are looking for is the BA11-MA. Desktop 4 slot Qbus the
same approx. size as a dual TU58.
Dan
Hello fellow-subscribers,
I have some 3rd party boards around that I would love to have identified, these are probably all pulled from PDP11 systems.
Versatec Controller 122, full metal handle, one 3M connector marked "differential" (HEX)
Dataram 40871 handwritten: Assy: 65123 S/N: 107, two white handles, one 3M connector (QUAD)
ACT 10198-0 or 10197-0, (c) 1983, two white handles, two 3M connectors, one Z80A (QUAD, most likely UNIBUS)
Thanks in advance,
Erik.
Thursday was a good day. Picked up a minty fresh Apple IIe with
the 80-column vid card, and three different GRiDs.
I know something about GRiD, but would like to do a little more
research. Any pointers? One is a Gridcase 1550 (the tank with the
little roller bar instead of the trackball) which has a bad screen,
unfortunately; a GRiD 386 (similarly-built tank that has a good
screen and is happy to boot); and a 486 convertible with a good
copy of Windows for Pen and a working pen. Very, VERY well-
built little(!) units.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.
Paul Braun
NerdWare -- The History of the PC and the Nerds who brought it to you.
nerdware(a)laidbak.com
www.laidbak.com/nerdware
I have a few too many CBM 8032's (12" green screen, full size
non-graphics keyboard, 32K memory) sitting in my closet. Please
contact me if you're nearby, and interested in one. Will trade for
non-vintage Intel stuff.
I also have a Trimm- or Sigma- pedestal style 11/73 system with TK50,
RQDX3/RD53, RX50's. Its a beautiful piece, but I need something much
more compact, like a desktop BA23ish enclosure or VT103.
I only have 700' of living space to play with, and the aesthetics corps
is frowning.
Elmo
Here is someone with a C64 up for grabs. Please reply to the original
sender.
Reply-to: 3web(a)netscape.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 02:29:29 -0700
From: pop <3web(a)netscape.net>
Subject: C-64
Hi,
I have a C-64 with 1541 floppy drive, NX-1000C color
printer, lots of disks and magazines I am getting rid of. I
hate to just throw it all away, but have no further use and
need to get rid of it all. Can you help?
Walt
3web(a)netscape.net
Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
VCF Europe: April 29th & 30th, Munich, Germany
VCF Los Angeles: Summer 2000 (*TENTATIVE*)
VCF East: Planning in Progress
See http://www.vintage.org for details!
<I also have a Trimm- or Sigma- pedestal style 11/73 system with TK50,
<RQDX3/RD53, RX50's. Its a beautiful piece, but I need something much
<more compact, like a desktop BA23ish enclosure or VT103.
BA23 is not much smaller and you will not get all of that in a BA23.
The VT103 is ok, but power will severely limit the system you can build
and there is no preovision for mass storage inside. I forget the Vt103.
Also there is the BA123 {stylish end table} and that has room and power.
You'd need a Terminal for that as the VIDEO console if installed wants
a 19" tube that is huge.
Another compact PDP-11 might be the PRO350 or 380 series.
In the end it depends on what you want the system to do.
Allison
< But I've been programming under multiple platforms in C for 10 years now.
<I've learned a thing or two about writing portable code. It's surprising
<how little effort it actually takes to write portable code, but it does tak
<a different mind set that most programmers (in my experience) don't have.
For the last 15-20 years I've been trying to resolve portability. Pascal
and C were clear winners over BASIC always. Keep in mind the platforms
I was trying to hit, CPM{z80}, RT-11 and VAX/VMS and for that carefull use
of C (pay attention to what char, byte, long, double and float were) it was
portable to the limit fo doing direct IO which is never portable. Pascal
never failed to be portable as all objects were the same.
< Careful, strings in C are *character* based (what's this ``byte'' you kee
<talking about? 8-) This is one area where programmers don't quite grasp
<portability issues. While it's true that characters in C must be at least
<bits in size, that doesn't mean they *must* be 8 bits in size; an
<implementation of C that uses Unicode natively could set the size of a
<character to 16 bits (and there is also the issue of whether the character
<is signed or unsigned---a plain char declaration is unspecified---it's
<implementation dependant whether a char is signed or unsigned).
This comes out of the tradidtion of C and unix and for that char is
typically 7-9bits and is really an unsigned BYTE. The 8/16/32 world
really forced a byte to conform to 8bits.
<Intel 386 class takes a penalty if you execute 16-bit instructions in a
<32-bit segment (or vice-versa). So, to move a counted string, you have:
Gee and HLLs were supposed to hide this... ;)
You should see what Z80 code looks like from a C compiler, without the
ability to do the pointer indirection (PDP-11 does index deferred) the
z80 compiler produces a lot of horrid code that resembles some of the
RISC machines but nowhere as efficient. Yet hand coding it in z80 can be
efficient and very few instructions.
< The ANSI C spec states that the Standard C functions can be understood b
<the compiler and treated specially. At least in the 386 line, most str*()
<and mem*() functions compile to inline code and avoid the function call
<overhead (a friend of mine actually triggered a bug in GCC using nested
<strcpy() calls).
<
<> Controll of hardware ? My memory may be fading, just I can not
<> see any reference to hardware controll in my K&R copy. All
<> hardware dependant stuff is proprietary to the compiler you
<> are using. And that's the same way as for example in PASCAL
<
< True---but it depends upon how the hardware is hooked up to the CPU---is
<it memory mapped I/O or I/O mapped I/O? If the former, you just declare a
<pointer to the memory location (mapped to the appropriate size) and go. I
<it's I/O mapped I/O there is probably a wrapper function that the compiler
<knows about and can inline.
K&R C assumes the operators are part of the OS and the language interacts
with the OS for IO. That is a useful concept for nonsystem programming or
end applications. Totally meaningless for driving a A/D card. however,
the right way to do that is to package and isolate the IO so you can use
standard C conventions to interact with the device. This keeps the mainline
code portable.
< But C (the actual language) never defined built-in IO functions, leaving
<I/O to subroutines (or functions). WRITELN is a language element of Pascal
<but printf() is just a function. Depending upon your view, that is either
<good thing or a bad thing (I think the lack of I/O statements in C is an
<elegant solution myself).
Despends. For a application that does standard IO to user and filesystem
Pascal or C {stdio} works fine. If your doing mixed IO to a A/D card and
present results to the user C looks nicer in code but Pascal handles that
effectively. Both fail when the IO is speed critical, say the nondma
floppy of a 200mhz or slower PC or when we are down in the mud of a Z80 or
8051.
<> Things like messing up the whole programm by one wrong ; or }
<> (something impossible on Assembly) or easyly produce memory
<> leaks (hard to do on other HLL).
Thats simple syntax and rules checking. C allows the naster conversion
of datatypes. I've been burned by longints and ints in pointers to
whatever.
< Depends upon what you're used to. Pascal uses those pesky semicolons as
<well, along with those annoying BEGIN and END statements. Assembly on the
<other hand, is fairly structured and tend to avoid the cascade of errors
<prone to compilers (although Microsoft's MASM is also prone to cascade
<errors).
I don't know if that doesn't exist in all of them. I've been smacked
around gross stupidity in ASM, MACRO, PAL, C, PASCAL, BASIC and yes even
fortran. All of them will go off the end of a structure that is pointed
to and hurt something sacred if you care to.
< You're not using C then. While it's possible to do:
<
< char *pd = destpointer;
< char *ps = srcpointer;
<
< for (i = 0 ; i < sizeof(somestruct) ; i++)
< *pd++ = *ps++;
On some system this produses different code (usually bigger)
on say z80 this will produce discrete code that is a monster.
< That's going about things the hard way. Why not:
<
< memcpy(destpointer,srcpointer,sizeof(somestruct));
Than this. Z80 library has enough smarts to use the LDIR/LDDR instruction
that is fast and efficient.
< Or even:
<
< *destpointer = *srcpointer;
Unpredictable how the compiler will do it even if it works.
This can be horrendus!
< One thing---I can't write Assembly on linus.slab.conman.org (an AMD 586)
<and have it run on tweedledum.slab.conman.org (68040). C at least lets me
<write code that will run on both machines.
As would pascal, ADA, basic{maybe}, fortran and heaven help me COBOL.
I find that as the machine gets smaller and resources are less prodigious
the progression is BIG HLL--> smaller language--> ASM, like Pascal, C and
then ASM.
Allison
Hello everybody,
I'm a reasonably new member of the list. I've been collecting vintage
computers for about a year now, and have decided to put up a web site
dedicated to vintage computing. The website is located at:
http://www.retrobits.com
I'd like to ask for your help in completing a survey. Here are the
details:
I'm going to launch the first edition of retrobits.com on March 15th.
In that edition, I'd like to include an article about collecting vintage
computers. It would be helpful to include a wide variety of people's
experiences with collecting - therefore, I'm inviting you to fill out a
brief survey about vintage computer collecting. If you have the time
and can participate, you'd really help me out, as well as helping out
other folks who are interested in collecting (or just getting started).
If you would like to respond, please send the responses directly to me
to avoid cluttering the list (unless you believe others in the list
would be interested in your responses, in which case, go for it!). My
e-mail address is:
retro(a)retrobits.com
Note: I will NOT give out your e-mail addresses to anybody, period, end
of discussion. If you'd like to be credited by name for your
participation in the survey, let me know and I'll be happy to do it.
Here are the questions:
1: Why do you collect vintage computers?
For instance: nostalgia, programming, historical interest, gaming
2: Where do you collect vintage computers?
For instance: thrift shops, garage sales, eBay, other auction sites
3: What advice would you give someone just starting out collecting?
For instance: what to avoid, how to restore dirty/broken systems
Extra credit: I'd be really interested to hear what computers people
collect (e.g., micros or minis, brands, age range)
Thanks in advance for your participation! Look for the first results on
March 15th. As more responses come in over time, I'll upgrade the
collecting area on the site with the additional details!
Earl Evans
<Old Pentium class computers make excellent kids computers. But if you're
Whats wrong with an old 386 or 486 box? I have a 386sx/16 running W95
and despite what you might believe it's a decent quick and dirty
printserver to a HP4L. Another 286sx/25 has a ISA based logic probe
and analog card in it. I have two 486DX2/66 one running NT4/SP4 on 4.3gb
and the other running Linux (RH5.2) on 500mb, both are a kick to use and
perform surprizingly well. Both support SVGA 1mb, have networking and
CDrom. Don't put down those older and often free to cheap 386/486 boxen.
When did pentium become the required cpu?
Allison
<several discussions of America's educational system snipped>
....So that's why we home-school, which pretty much sums up *my* opinion.
Hmm... what's the ideal home-schooling computer? I want the kids to
own the computer, be able to learn languages (Pascal, C++, Forth, open to
suggestions, as well as Japanese, Russian, etc.), be able to do science
projects with it, be able to word-process but not necessarily spell-check,
be able to run good educational software. I'm already biased towards a Mac
Plus (and own one), but certainly ready for suggestions. NeXT? MicroVax
3100? Cost, hardware and software, is a factor, of course.
I'm *hoping* this is an on-topic question, in as much as classic
computers are cheaper and simpler but demand more of the user to make work
properly and therefore make better learning tools than current machines; if
the answer is a new wintel box or a new iBook, I'd still like to hear it
but I'd like to hear it off-list. TIA,
- Mark
Allison, I believe you've been sold a bill of goods.
First of all, look at what a teacher has to do for his/her education and
later for his/her salary as compared, say, to an engineering student. From
what I've observed myself, and even more so from what I hear from my boys,
both in college, the workload in a typical week for an engineering student
adds up to about what an education major does in a semester. Secondly, he
doesn't have to look forward to those 7 20-hour-day work-weeks for the next
ten years, and he knows that he needn't worry about being fired, laid off,
or much of anything else that would rock the boat. Sure, he gets about $45K
after ten years, rather than the 60-75K the engineer will get, but he only
has to work a 6-hour day, and he only has to do that 183 days a year to get
full salary and, ultimately a generous pension.
Secondly, look at the quality of those individuals. These are people who
didn't do so well in high school, mainly due to lack of ambition and
diligence, didn't want to work too hard in college, and, of course, couldn't
get into a good college. Fortunately, a good college isn't required. On
top of that, he's chosen a niche in which he only has to work a 6-hour day,
and he only has to do that 183 days a year to get full salary and,
ultimately a generous pension.
Of course he's not into it for the money. He doesn't want to work hard
enough to earn a lot of money.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: allisonp(a)world.std.com <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, March 10, 2000 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: Re: languages (Teachers)
>On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, George Rachor wrote:
>
>> >>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, sjm wrote:
>> >>>> lazy (everybody has a teacher horror story to tell). But those who
>> >>>> stand out in my mind were the genuine heros. They were IN to what
>> >>>> they did. They LOVED the kids. They latched on to us and energized
>> >>>> us and really taught us. They made us solve problems, they made us
>
>True.
>
>My father was a construction contractor and used to have several teachers
>that worked for him during the busy summer months so they could make
>what my mother did as a LPN (2years college).
>
>When I left DEC I looked at teaching, I needed a masters in teaching over
>any technical degrees and could expect to make 10-20thousand less a year.
>It's pretty sad that that the average teacher has 4-6 years of college
>education and makes less than the average person with that kind of time in
>a technical degreee.
>
>Allison
>
>
> I use dialect in some of my writing, but there are certainly purposes and
> occasions where it is inappropriate. In those, I would use standard
> English. Here in New England we speak differently, although the
> dialect is not as extreme as BEV, an is mostly pronunciational. Notice
> how media insists on a standard pronunciation, that's why all our local
> tv new readers sound like foreigners. It's really amusing to hear them
> try to say Quonnochontaug for the first time.
Same her in Germany, but considering the practice in (German) Swiss TV,
where interviews are DOUBBED or SUBTITELED in Standard German, we are
still on the good side. They realy sub title them ... it's always a
strange thing - hearing a person speaking German (Well, Schwitzerduetsch)
and tead German subtitles ... Belive it or not, they are not just adding
them when guy's from the behind the forest are interviewed, but always.
That's Strange!
H.
--
VCF Europa am 29./30. April 2000 in Muenchen
http://www.vintage.org/vcfehttp://www.homecomputer.de/vcfe
Hi,
A few more things added. I put up the rest of the RT-11 System Reference
Manual (Appendix), the RT-11 System Message Manual, and jpeg color scans
of the 1960 Electronics Illustrated article "Build An Electronic
Computer" in the "Miscellaneous" document section. I have a few more
things to OCR, including the RT-11 Software Support Manual, Fortran Notes,
etc. In the next few days...
www.retrobytes.org
Cheers,
Aaron
<Well, wait some more years - my 20 year old is still ok with her K5-100.
Gee and I gave in and bought a P166/mmx when my 486dx board died. Still
runs dos/W3.1 though. Can't run one of the FPGA tools under W95 so I
don't.
Allison
<I've been noticing the same thing when going source diving in the Linux
<kernel and lots of other places. I think 5% would be a pretty generous
<guess there (unless you count all the copyright crap and credits), most of
<the time there isn't a single comment anywhere on the screen I'm looking at
Minix a simpler teaching OS that is unix like is likely the most liberally
commented code I've seen, maybe 5%, 10 if you wrap the book around it.
<If you can lay your hands on unstripped sources to DEC PDP-11 OSes,
<they're really nice examples of well-commented assembly language (no I'm
<not kissing ass, I haven't seen the full RT sources so I wouldn't even know
I have seen RT11 bare and commented. Bare is readable, the commented stuff
is something more, much more. It covers the wacky why'd the do that stuff.
<that interests me, and even then half the time I just have to fill it with
<printfs and recompile to see what it actually does, since I can't figure
<out what it's *supposed* to do.
I do that with Coldfusion (web server middleware), Qbasic4.5 because the
debugers (if they exist) arent able to tell me what I want the way I want
it.
Allison
> How do I get it to copy the whole *tree* in a directory or on a
>disk to a whole other part of the system?
COPY DISK$IN:[INDIRECTORY...]*.*;* DISK$OUT:[OUTDIRECTORY...]
For doing whole disks, I prefer to use BACKUP.
Tim.
The concept of immersion makes sense to me. I came to the U.S. in '52 with
nary a word of English under my belt. I was admitted to the local school
system in first grade, regular classes, with no interpreter anywhere in the
building. That was PS49 in the New York school system. I was later moved
to PS20 where even fewer folks spoke German fluently. Within 6 weeks my
performance was improving to such extent that my language skills were to a
state in which they were not perceived by the teachers to be an impediment.
It didn't hurt that there were lots of Yiddish-speaking merchants in the
neighborhoods through which I walked to and from school. Yiddish is quite
similar to German and certainly makes conversation easier.
Note that I said it took 6 weeks to "catch on" and not the seven or eight
years it typically takes here with the ESL/ESOL programs. If a person has
no reasonable alternative, particularly if that person's young and flexible,
and not fet a bunch of SH*T from the community and from the government,
he/she can learn enough to get by in school, which is more than what's
needed to "get by" in life. I think it's the motivation, not the age,
though. If an adult is motivated to communicate effectively, the road isn't
long, though it may be harder than for a kid.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Christopher Finney <af-list(a)wfi-inc.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, March 09, 2000 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: languages
>
>
>On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Mike Ford wrote:
>
>> California has made the correct choice in dropping the whole english as a
>> second language program in favor of english immersion. The sooner you
learn
>> english and become proficient, the better students do in general. This
>> isn't to say that ebonics or any other cultural language doesn't have
>> merit, but points out the peril of "too much" local control in a polical
>> setting. This is like offering "creation" as an alternative to "Darwin",
>> the problem being once you declare "God created the heavens and earth"
you
>> have branched off from the next 10 years of scientific education to a
path
>> that leads to what?
>
>I don't know...Canada (ok, I'm biased a little being Canadian) allows for
>official provincial languages outside of the national official languages,
>French and English. It's a neat system, which I think provides a lot of
>flexibility for subcultures to preserve their language/history. I'm
>definitely not one of the "Speak English or Get Out" crowd.
>
>As far as evolution/creation (oh boy, here we go), I think the problem
>with their original idea of teaching both disciplines fell short right at
>the place where they had to rectify the problem you mentioned, which
>simplifies to the question of where a "safe" re-entry point was in the
>continuum of Science for those who went apostate and chose Creationism
>over Darwinian Evolution...
>
--- Geoff Roberts <geoffrob(a)stmarks.pp.catholic.edu.au> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ethan Dicks" <ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com>
> > > I don't have any Uni level CS under my belt, and that seems
> > > to be what's needed to comprehend it.
> >
> > Rubbish.
> > I saw that we had a UNIX machine nestled amongst the VAXen...
> You are fortunate in having had access to such systems early in the piece.
That is true. I was also fortunate enough to sieze the opportunity. Of
the handful of college barely-over-minimum-wage backup operators that
paraded through SRC, only two of us are making a living in IT. Most of
the operators mounted the tapes, printed the labels and read trashy novels
while the TU-78 did its stuff for 6 hours. The other geek and I wrote
programs on one of the other systems while the main system was being backed
up. We both ended up as full-time programmers for the company's VMS and
UNIX products. Several people had access to the programming resources.
Most did nothing with the opportunity.
> > I never learned a programming language in school, only by rolling up my
> > sleeves, going into larval mode once again and banging out a fun project.
>
> Interesting. I got the impression that the knowledgeable C programmers
> around either
> a) Worked in a professional computing environment and 'worked their way up'
> or
> b) Went to university and studied CS there.
> or
> c) Both.
I got my first job writing 6502 assembler for the C-64 in 1982 before I
was old enough to drive. My mother had to drop me off and work and sign
my contracts. I realize this is atypical, but there it is. I did start
off at University with a double CS and EE major. I took one "FORTRAN for
Engineers" class and after two years in the program switched my major and
earned a BA in History (while learning to program in C on the side at work).
So given your above model of the anticipated career paths of C programmers,
I would most closely fall into A). I learned C at work, doing a project
to automate one of my assigned job tasks after having been a professional
assembler programmer for two to three years. I did it by asking the "real"
programmers at work, exploring source code and reading K&R cover to cover
several times. I still tell people to start with that book, BTW. It's
a goldmine of information.
> C doesn't strike me as a language that could be 'self taught' without prior
> knowledge of a lot of things that you don't see outside that kind of
> environment.
I'm not sure I agree here.
> All the books I ever saw on C seemed to expect that you already have a
> working knowledge of data structures architecture of the machine etc.
Have you read K&R? It assumes a PDP-11/VAXish machine architecture, but
it covers the basic data structures, linked lists, multi-dimensional arrays,
strings, pointers to arrays of pointers. More than enough stuff to get you
into buckets of trouble.
> TP was perhaps just better documented for ignorant newbies than C is.
I did work with TP at one job. The programmer there would certainly
be described as a newbie. He was a business major, not a geek. I have
no idea how he ever produced that much working code except by pure
force of will. It was extremely inelegant.
> That you have 'self taught' on it regardless indicates otherwise, so I will
> revise my opinion. However I must agree that it does seem to (me at least,
> and I saw a another response to my original post that agreed) to be a "write
> only" language unless it is very well commented.
Again, that depends. I've seen some stuff that was absolutely unintellegible
without comments (and not very understandable even _with_ comments) and other
things that are so idiomatic and commonly used that adding comments disturbs
the flow to the point of hiding what's happening.
There are other languages that are _more_ "write only" (APL comes to mind
immediately), but I do agree that zero comments makes C extremely difficult
to understand.
> Er, I should point out that I don't/didn't intend to start a holy war here...
It tends to happen when anyone makes somewhat broad and somewhat firm
statements about anything in this biz, editors, OSes _and_ languages,
to name a few.
> I'm merely relating my experiences. We all seem to have our favourites, I
> guess I like TP because it was the first 'real' language (something compiled,
_That_ is typical in my experience.
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
I have recently found the time to start playing with my VAXen
again, and have been struck by a bit of a confusing dilemma:
Why is it that when I attempt to copy a large tree from any place
to another under VMS 7.2, it always copies as follows:
This command:
backup dub3:[000000...]*.*;* dub2:
causes vms to copy a directory structure that looks like this:
[000000.000TOOLS.AXP]file1...file2...etc
[000000.000TOOLS.VAX]file3...file4...etc
to this:
[000000.000TOOLS] (empty)
[000000.AXP]file1...file2...etc
[000000.VAX]file3...file4...etc
How do I get it to copy the whole *tree* in a directory or on a
disk to a whole other part of the system? I tried reading the help
available on copy and backup, but I haven't been able to figure out how to
copy a whole tree from one place to another.
Thanks for your help!
Greg Linder
fluke(a)mcs.net
>Hmpf! A bad programmer can make an awful mess in _ANY_
>language, including ADA.
Absolutely... it is possible to write well in any language
(including BASIC, contrary to many people's opinions) and it
is possible to write poorly in any language. It depends more
on the skill of the programmer...
...but I think I better stop here before entirely rekindling
the language wars...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>C's abstraction begins to bore me and it seems a write only language.
Unfortunately, it appears that those who advocate and write in C
and other such structured languages appear to have lost the ability
to comment their code (at least it seems that way from all the code
I look at at work -- I would say a mere 5% is really commented).
They appear to assume that C code is itself sufficient commenting...
It doesn't work.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
You're right about what rises to the top, Allison, and I'd add that the fact
that teachers are, in general, represented by a "union" which emphasizes the
normal distribution just as the environment in which they work does, by
their nature desiring neither accolade nor criticism. Being good doesn't
reap the rewards it should in an environment where being good is good, but
being average is better.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, March 10, 2000 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: Re: languages (Teachers)
><Allison, I believe you've been sold a bill of goods.
>
>Looked for myself in my locale.
>
><First of all, look at what a teacher has to do for his/her education and
>>>>>snipped/
>
>I know far to many doing the real thing...
>
>Like someone else said but I'll say differently: Like cream that rises to
>the top, so does the scum. We see the exceptional asses and heros, the
>average teacher is more in the world of trying not to be disenchanted with
>to many rules, too few resources and an overabundance of students.
>
><didn't do so well in high school, mainly due to lack of ambition and
><diligence, didn't want to work too hard in college, and, of course,
couldn'
><get into a good college. Fortunately, a good college isn't required. On
><top of that, he's chosen a niche in which he only has to work a 6-hour day
><and he only has to do that 183 days a year to get full salary and,
><ultimately a generous pension.
>
>Well your experience is different. You wish to see the scum and you do,
>those that do the job are missed and those that exceed the mark are
>ignored.
>
>I don't for one second believe that our educational system is up to stuff.
>If anything I'd be glad to post my parting address to my HS class, it
>wasn't complmetary to skills taught in 1971. The briefest words I'd still
>say is I knew Algebra, trig and could write a term paper that would knock
>your socks off but... income tax preparation and employment paperwork
>(W4, resume, applications) were a mystery. I was trained to go to college.
>Thankfully I persued both academic and vocational path in parallel.
>
>
>Allison
>
This comment (not specifically, but as it aligns with several others) serves
to show how easy it is to get out of touch with what's happening in the
institutions within which most of us spent 10-12 years of our lives.
It's true that some (few, however) teachers are present before the majority
of students are in the school. It's also true that some teachers remain
present after the students are dismissed at the end of the school day.
However, I'd add a couple of things to the already foul mix.
First of all, if my skills as an observer are not totally off, and I made
records of most of this, by the way, the ones who are present when the kids
show up are generally the same ones who are present after they've left. In
the three schools I observed, the faculty ranged in size between 105 and
198. In the cases where I made long-term records, the ones who were present
early were, with a couple of specific exceptions, the same ones as were
present late in the day, numbering typically 5 in the smallest school to 8
in the largest. In one high school, one of the teachers who stayed late was
married to a middle school teacher and she was early for the same reason
that he was late. They took one car and she dropped him off at the high
school just in time, but then arrived early. He stayed late because she
didn't get off until somewhat after he did, so he stayed late about the same
amount as she arrived early.
For a goodly period of time, I was in one school or another almost every
day, between my boys' fights and the various committee meetings, and trying
to teach teachers to do something beyond cute little calendars, etc, with
their computers. I had the advantage that I had no social bond to any of
the teachers, hence didn't have to let the fact that I liked one or another
and perhaps disliked yet another influence my assessment of their behavior
and performance.
If you ask anyone who was present, I was equally harsh with everyone,
pounding on the administrators to be more efficient at the same time that I
urged the teachers not to be so self-serving in their attitudes and, above
all, in their negotiations.
I admired the teachers who taught me along the way, and certainly harbor no
acrimony toward those who didn't. All in all, they were a tolerant and
longsuffering lot as well as being sufficiently devoted to turn many
rough-hewn youngsters into decent scholars. I remember many of my own
teachers fondly and greatly appreciate what they did to make it possible for
me to realize my current circumstances,
Those were not the teachers of today, however. It's true they now have
neither the respect nor the authority that was afforded their predecessors,
but they haven't the determination and self-respect that was common to the
teachers I remember. You needn't wander any further than the teachers'
lounge to learn that they regard their peers and sometimes even themselves
as relatively lazy and lacking in ambition. I didn't invent this view of
our current crop, either, by the way, as it is reflected in the news almost
daily.
In general it appears the Republicans see them as may become if their course
isn't altered, while the Democrats see them as the democrats wish they would
become.
I personally would support an effort to limit the length of time a teacher
can teach to five years at a stretch. After this time is up, I'd require
they go out into the world and do something else for five years, at the end
of which I'd see they were paid as much as they got for doing whatever they
were doing, so long as it wasn't teaching. After five years, do it again .
. . Each year, I'd also dismiss the bottom 10% based on performance, but
without prejudice, allowing them to take 5 years to do something else, and
replace them with new graduates. After five years they could reapply with
the assumption that they had learned something valuable in the interim.
I've heard stories about fellows like your EE/Music double major. I've
never seen one up close though. It's probably a California-ism. That place
is like another planet. I like to visit, but I wouldn't like to live
there.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Christopher Finney <af-list(a)wfi-inc.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, March 10, 2000 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Re: languages (Teachers)
>This is total bullshit. Total. A very good, long-time friend of mine did 5
>years at University to come out with a dual EE/Music Comp. degree and
>walked into a $60k per year job with a cutting-edge tech company. He works
>8 hours a day, maybe 2 hours extra at home to straighten out paperwork.
>Maybe. In addition to his base salary, he receives stock options that just
>about double his yearly salary. He is 27 and owns a house in Huntington
>Beach, less than three blocks from the shore. He just returned from a
>three-week vacation in Italy, after being with the company for 4 years.
>
>Anyone who kills themselves in school to walk out into a $45k per year job
>that requires *140* hours per week is not intelligent. A person who does
>this today is either a moron or a massochist. If this is what you want for
>your children, that's up to you.
>
>This is my last post on the subject. I do wonder what really soured you on
>teachers, besides your claim to have studied them so closely in the work
>environment. To demean the entire teaching profession as it exists today
>in gross generalizations shows a lack of objectivity and portrays you as
>nothing but a bitter, old crank.
>
>To that end, I'm not sure what rubs me so raw about this...usually I can
>keep my big mouth shut. But listening to someone bash a group of people
>who are generally dedicated to their profession, and who put up with poor
>materials and low salaries, makes me sick.
>
>Aaron
>
>On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Richard Erlacher wrote:
>
>> Allison, I believe you've been sold a bill of goods.
>>
>> First of all, look at what a teacher has to do for his/her education and
>> later for his/her salary as compared, say, to an engineering student.
>From
>> what I've observed myself, and even more so from what I hear from my
boys,
>> both in college, the workload in a typical week for an engineering
student
>> adds up to about what an education major does in a semester. Secondly,
he
>> doesn't have to look forward to those 7 20-hour-day work-weeks for the
next
>> ten years, and he knows that he needn't worry about being fired, laid
off,
>> or much of anything else that would rock the boat. Sure, he gets about
$45K
>> after ten years, rather than the 60-75K the engineer will get, but he
only
>> has to work a 6-hour day, and he only has to do that 183 days a year to
get
>> full salary and, ultimately a generous pension.
>>
>> Secondly, look at the quality of those individuals. These are people who
>> didn't do so well in high school, mainly due to lack of ambition and
>> diligence, didn't want to work too hard in college, and, of course,
couldn't
>> get into a good college. Fortunately, a good college isn't required. On
>> top of that, he's chosen a niche in which he only has to work a 6-hour
day,
>> and he only has to do that 183 days a year to get full salary and,
>> ultimately a generous pension.
>>
>> Of course he's not into it for the money. He doesn't want to work hard
>> enough to earn a lot of money.
>>
>> Dick
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: allisonp(a)world.std.com <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
>> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>> Date: Friday, March 10, 2000 1:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: Re: languages (Teachers)
>>
>>
>> >On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, George Rachor wrote:
>> >
>> >> >>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, sjm wrote:
>> >> >>>> lazy (everybody has a teacher horror story to tell). But those
who
>> >> >>>> stand out in my mind were the genuine heros. They were IN to
what
>> >> >>>> they did. They LOVED the kids. They latched on to us and
energized
>> >> >>>> us and really taught us. They made us solve problems, they made
us
>> >
>> >True.
>> >
>> >My father was a construction contractor and used to have several
teachers
>> >that worked for him during the busy summer months so they could make
>> >what my mother did as a LPN (2years college).
>> >
>> >When I left DEC I looked at teaching, I needed a masters in teaching
over
>> >any technical degrees and could expect to make 10-20thousand less a
year.
>> >It's pretty sad that that the average teacher has 4-6 years of college
>> >education and makes less than the average person with that kind of time
in
>> >a technical degreee.
>> >
>> >Allison
>> >
>> >
>>
>
--- Geoff Roberts <geoffrob(a)stmarks.pp.catholic.edu.au> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Glenatacme(a)aol.com>
> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 3:51 PM
> Subject: Re: The C programming language
>
>
> > In a message dated 03/09/2000 3:19:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de writes:
> >
> > > I wouldn't consider C as anything 'grown'. maybe evolved in the
> > > sense of degeneration.
> >
> > Hey, Hans, I don't get this. C is the most versatile, flexible, and
> > portable language ever devised. It permits complete control of
> > hardware while at the same time allowing elegance in program design
> > and structure.
Allowing is the keyword here. I've seen some stuff that just took my
breath away and I've also seen stuff that made me retch.
> You forgot to add "and is perfectly comprehensible to anyone with long
> experience in assembly language or machine code."
It's been said that C has all the power of assembler with all the legibility
of assembler. If you've ever taken C and compiled it on a PDP-11 and looked
at the output, you'll quickly notice that many of the "features" of the
language translate to very few instructions - it's assembler shorthand,
essentially. This, to me, is a benfit, not a detriment, but I _like_
assembler, especially PDP-11 MACRO (and it's relatives like the MC68K)
> I don't have any Uni level CS under my belt, and that seems
> to be what's needed to comprehend it.
Rubbish. My first language was BASIC (like so many kids in the late 1970s),
followed quickly by 1802 and 6502 machine language (no compiler - stuff
entered in hex), then, about six years after I started programming, C. Working
at SRC in 1984, I saw that we had a UNIX machine nestled amongst the VAXen
running VMS. It was a VAX-11/750 w/2Mb RAM and two RK07 drives. I don't have
the drives (they were discarded in 1992), but I do have _that_ 11/750
(s/n BT000354) now upgraded to 8Mb w/SI9900, Fuji Eagle, etc. We swapped out
different sets of RK07 packs to run various Unices to conform to the
customer's configuration - 4.0BSD, 4.1BSD and SYSIII, IIRC. I still have the
VAX SYSIII tapes somewhere, but who knows if they are still legible after
all this time. Anyway, way back then, I'd heard about UNIX and decided I
wanted a piece of it. I got an account, borrowed a copy of the K&R book
and used it as a reference to write my first C program. It was an
abomination as far as style goes, but it did work - it converted a text table
of board handle numbers into a formatted picture of the contents of all of
our PDP-11 and VAXen, a job I'd do today in perl and probably HTML.
What I've found from personal experience is that to really _learn_ a
programming language, I need a project to keep me going past the learning
cliff. With 6502 assembler, it was hand-compiling Scott Adams' adventure
engine from BASIC (a story I've been happily able to share with him many
years later); with Java, it's my program to calculate sunset/sunrise charts
for my Antarctic web page; with Inform it was translating Zork from MDL. It
can be a monster project or a few dozen K of source, but the important part
is having a motivational goal to complete. I never learned a programming
language in school, only by rolling up my sleeves, going into larval mode
once again and banging out a fun project.
Just for the record, I am very fond of C. Yes, atrocities have been
committed in it, but it's right up there with perl and assembler as
my favorite tools to get the job done. Just be sure that you use the
right tool for the right job.
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
>I did the same thing, although I added a twist, I installed one of >these
>new (and dirt cheap) removable drive caddy things that you >mount an IDE
>drive inside of. I install software on a "master" disk, >which has a bulk
>copy program on it. Then I copy the entire drive >over to a built in drive
>on the same IDE cable. I have a switch on >the outside of the case that
>makes the internal drive a "master" or >slave (dpdt toggle that is wired
>with wire wrap wire to the four >pins constituting the jumper positions on
>the drive.
>
>Switch the internal drive back to "master" status and reboot. Makes >fixing
>things when my 4.5 yr old drags the entire desktop into the >recycle bin
>and flushes it a lot easier!
>
>--Chuck
Old Pentium class computers make excellent kids computers. But if you're
*really* on budget, an old Mac Plus or, if they don't like the Mac Plus'
lack of color graphics, a Mac LC would be perfect.
____________________________________________________________
David Vohs, Digital Archaeologist & Computer Historian.
Computer Collection:
"Triumph": Commodore 64C, 1802, 1541, FSD-1, GeoRAM 512, Okimate 20.
"Leela": Macintosh 128 (Plus upgrade), Nova SCSI HDD, Imagewriter II.
"Delorean": TI-99/4A.
"Monolith": Apple Macintosh Portable.
"Spectrum": Tandy Color Computer 3.
____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
I have just been given a Radio Shack TRS-80 pocket computer. It is in
'as new' condition, complete with manual and cassette interface. I
haven't had a chance to play with it yet, but am about to take it to bed
and have a look at it (Fiona will _love_ that!).
Are there many of these on the list? From a brief glance at the manual
it looks as if it is quite powerful for its size and era.
--
Regards
Pete
Hello port-vax,
So I've been looking for some way to contribute to the VAX port of NetBSD
without interfering with anyone else (and without incurring too much stress
as this is still just a hobby as yet). I decided I would try my hand at
adding support for the on-board DSSI interface on the VAX 4000/300 and the
MicroVAX/VAXServer 3400.
To further this end I have acquired the technical manuals on both CPUs
(KA640 and KA670) but while they describe the hardware for DSSI in great
detail (its very similar to SCSI btw) they both reference, but don't
include, the list of valid DSSI opcodes and their parameters!
Needless to say that makes it a bit difficult to implement. :-)
I'm looking for any documentation on the DSSI opcodes, or a reference to a
DEC EK-xxx document that documents same if you know of one. Can anyone help
out here?
On a related note, I was musing that as I attached disk and tape units I'd
call them 'dd0, dd1, ..., dt0, dt1 ...' (as in DSSI Disk 0, DSSI Tape 0,
etc) My /dev directory doesn't seem to have any devices by that name so
they would appear to be free for use, but you never know ...
--Chuck
<I suppose it depends on the assembly language. I can write PDP-11 assemble
<in C (knowing nearly exactly how the code generator works), but I can't
<write VAX assembler in C since there are VAX instructions that don't
<represent well. SPARC code is also easy to write C code with as there are
<few instructions.
An interesting contardiction as VAX is a extreme superset of PDP-11.
<The place where this really comes home is in one of my other hobbies where
<I write embedded robotics code in C for microprocessors like the 68HC11.
C is ok, but I've felt strongly for years it was better for tasks that
wanted you to be closer to the hardware. I like the control structures
of C. Pascal has been a favorite for years when I really don't want to
know the hardware. I prefer the data structures of Pascal.
Allison
<I have to question. I was once asked by a friend to
<help with some math homework. After looking over the
<questions, I found that I couldn't answer any of them.
<It wasn't that they were too hard, it was that they
<were too ambiguous. After some more talking with the
<student, I found that these were some of the "don't
<make the student feel bad by having the wrong answer"
<type questions. They were designed so that almost any
<answer could be considered correct.
I used to call them "Hobsons choice" If no, why. If Yes, Why.
Great for the debaters but a quandry for those that were more
interested in facts or testable theory. Your grade was based on
the why portion. Now who knows whats important.
Allison
<Allison, I believe you've been sold a bill of goods.
Looked for myself in my locale.
<First of all, look at what a teacher has to do for his/her education and
>>>>snipped/
I know far to many doing the real thing...
Like someone else said but I'll say differently: Like cream that rises to
the top, so does the scum. We see the exceptional asses and heros, the
average teacher is more in the world of trying not to be disenchanted with
to many rules, too few resources and an overabundance of students.
<didn't do so well in high school, mainly due to lack of ambition and
<diligence, didn't want to work too hard in college, and, of course, couldn'
<get into a good college. Fortunately, a good college isn't required. On
<top of that, he's chosen a niche in which he only has to work a 6-hour day
<and he only has to do that 183 days a year to get full salary and,
<ultimately a generous pension.
Well your experience is different. You wish to see the scum and you do,
those that do the job are missed and those that exceed the mark are
ignored.
I don't for one second believe that our educational system is up to stuff.
If anything I'd be glad to post my parting address to my HS class, it
wasn't complmetary to skills taught in 1971. The briefest words I'd still
say is I knew Algebra, trig and could write a term paper that would knock
your socks off but... income tax preparation and employment paperwork
(W4, resume, applications) were a mystery. I was trained to go to college.
Thankfully I persued both academic and vocational path in parallel.
Allison
In reverse order: This is a final reminder that the annual Mike & Key ARC
Electronics/Ham Radio/Computer swap meet takes place TOMORROW (Saturday the
11th) at the Western Washington Fairgrounds from 09:00 - 16:00 (most
sellers pack up and go shortly before or after 15:00).
Buyer admission is USD $6.00. Kids 12 or under are free with
parent/guardian/similar adult guidance figure. Parking is free.
If you get lost, just ask any local for directions to the 'Puyallup
Fairgrounds.' Pronunciation, BTW, is "Pew-All-Up" for the WA-state impaired.
;-)
Now, the update: As I usually do, I will be selling this year. However,
the list of stuff I posted that I was bringing earlier has changed as follows.
BOTH Exabyte 8500 drives have been sold to early interest. I still have
THREE EXB-8200 drives available. Also, the DSD's and other chassis I
mentioned have been spoken for (Eric Smith contacted me last week to
confirm his visit), and will not be showing up.
Still, I've got plenty of other bits and pieces, including a VT220 and KB
(works), a small UPS (600VA or so), and more bits and pieces than I care to
think about at the moment (no Q-bus boards, sorry).
I'll hope to see at least a couple of you there!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
For our list members on the northeastern coast, I present this as received
>from the NetBSD port-VAX mailing list...
-=-=-=-=- <snip> -=-=-=-=-
X-From_: port-vax-owner-kyrrin=bluefeathertech.com(a)netbsd.org Fri Mar 10
11:50:49 2000
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:49:25 -0500
From: "Matt Dobush" <DOBUSM(a)torrington.com>
To: port-vax(a)netbsd.org
Subject: Free TU81 Plus 9 track tape drive !
Sender: port-vax-owner(a)netbsd.org
Delivered-To: port-vax(a)netbsd.org
I have a TU-81 tape drive that worked the last time I used it a few years ago.
It is free to a good home. Actually, free to anybody willing to come to my
work and pick it up !
No strings attached. I really don't want to get into shipping this sucker,
so you have to come to Northwestern Connecticut to pick it up. I can meet
after hours or on a weekend if needed.
Please E-Mail me directly with any questions or offers since I'm not a
regular subscriber to your list.
-Matt Dobush
Systems Administrator
dobusm(a)torrington.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
If interested, please contact Matt directly. Thanks!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
OK, here's something that's (much) more on topic that talking about spoken
language...
Anyone listen to NPR's all things considered today? (friday) They had a short
story about a commodore 64 user group in oregon. It basically profiled a
group of mostly older people who still use and enjoy them for what they can
still do. It also mentioned their scarcity and having to scrouge secondhand
stores to find parts.
DB Young ICQ: 29427634
view the computers of yesteryear at
http://members.aol.com/suprdave/classiccmp/museum.htm
--You can lead a whore to Vassar, but you can't make her think--
Another thing to keep in mind about these jobs is that not only is the
summer vacation long, but there are plenty of days without kids in the
building, when most teachers go skiing or golfing, or hot-tubbing, and the
workday for most of them is less than 6 hours.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: John Foust <jfoust(a)threedee.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, March 10, 2000 8:13 AM
Subject: OT: Re: languages
>At 04:20 PM 3/9/00 -0500, Carlos Murillo-Sanchez wrote:
>>What other profession is there with an entry salary of
>>about $28K, and a top salary (after 20+ years) of less than $70K ?
>
>Actually, there are lots of jobs like that. Also, have you
>forgotten the nice long summer vacation?
>
>- John
>
I didn't see Seth's remarks. I'm sure he makes a good point, and the
remarks I've put forth certainly don't apply to every teacher. However,
I've had ample oppurtunity to sample what's out there, and it's a dreadful
shame that there's so much evidence of what I've said. The extreme cases
are the ones that catch the most attention, and that applies to my attention
as well as anyone else's. I'm as sorry as anyone that this is what we see
when we take a long look, though. I certainly had hoped, when I ventured
into this territory, that I'd find something different. It has not
encouraged me to be optimistic.
My elder son, by the way, has gotten the message that this is an easy and
fun profession. He's dropped out of Harvard and attends a state teachers'
college, having declared that he didn't really want to work so hard and
didn't want to spend as much time working as he observed that I did. I'm
not proud of that, but it certainly fits, both with my observations and my
conclusions about them.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Smith <ip500(a)roanoke.infi.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, March 10, 2000 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: languages (Teachers)
>Bravo Seth,
>Dick's comment just went too far. my neighbor is an Art teacher in a
>local High School and believe me---if she's not at work, she's either
>grading papers, planning next weeks work or staying after class to work
>with other kids. SOME are really dedicated to the profession!
>
>sjm wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 08:58:43AM -0700, Richard Erlacher wrote:
>> > Another thing to keep in mind about these jobs is that not only is the
>> > summer vacation long, but there are plenty of days without kids in the
>> > building, when most teachers go skiing or golfing, or hot-tubbing, and
the
>> > workday for most of them is less than 6 hours.
>> >
>> > Dick
>>
>> I think it's extremely unfair to label all teachers like this.
>> You make them sound lazy. I know only one highschool teacher today,
>> but I do know he works his ass off. He does NOT take the summer off,
>> he takes summer teaching contracts to make ends meet. After teaching
>> his classes he has, further courses of his own to attend, papers to
>> grade, lesson plans to work out, staff meetings, conference meetings,
>> parent-teacher meetings, and inbetween tons of shit none of us
>> would want to deal with dumped on him. Sometimes he doesn't get
>> home until 11:00 -- and neither do I, but at least I get paid for it.
>>
>> I attended public school between 1979 and 1992, in both California
>> and Connecticut. We moved around frequently, and I was in 8
>> different schools during that time. That's a lot of different school
>> systems, and a lot of different teachers. Yes, I had some that were
>> merely doing their job, not going the extra mile. And I think I
>> can probably put my finger on exactly one who I would honestly call
>> lazy (everybody has a teacher horror story to tell). But those who
>> stand out in my mind were the genuine heros. They were IN to what
>> they did. They LOVED the kids. They latched on to us and energized
>> us and really taught us. They made us solve problems, they made us
>> work together, they made us look forward to their classes every day.
>> They had a passion for what they did, and God bless them for it.
>>
>> I can't think of a more honorable profession.
>>
>> -Seth
I've got little sympathy for the teachers in in our school system. Many of
them may be honest and hard-working, but during the six years during which I
spent on the order of 12-15 hours a week in the school building, observing
the goings-on and attending various meetings, I saw what I feel is a
better-than-average sample of what the teachers themselves, school system
issues aside, are all about.
First of all, during my second year in this close-up of the system, I had
occasion to visit one gym teacher. He had a 5-bedroom, 2-story house with a
3-car attached garage, and a car parked in the driveway because the garage
was full of cars. That particular teacher was always complaining about the
low pay. He and I met in the context of an accusation made by a number of
the gym students, that he spent his time reading the newspaper, while he
should have been supervising the locker room in order to help prevent the
thefts and violence that had been brought to the steering committee's
attention. When he told me what he earned, which I already knew, I pointed
out to him that I had paid more than that in state taxes that year. He
simply lived beyond his means. I, on the other hand, lived in a 3-bedroom
ranch-style house with merely a carport. There were no extra vehicles in my
driveway, either.
One 6th-grade math teacher openly declared that he didn't have time to look
outside while the children were leaving the school premises to help prevent
violent incidents and harrassment as had been brought to the steering
committee's attention. I observed that he was always one of the last
teacher to arrive in the morning, though he was always out of the parking
lot before the first 10% of the student body was leaving the building.
On one occasion, I protested the frivolous activity that was being pursued
in the social studies classes, which was clearly an art project. After the
social studies department spent 10 weeks of the semester on this activity, I
was accused, perhaps justifiably, of throwing my weight around. The entire
social studies department made an appearance at a committee meeting, to
register their complaint, and I challenged them to indicate even a hint of
how this artsy-project had tied into the curriculum, first by asking what
the cultural significance of the item being mimicked was to the
Native-Americans of whose history these were a component, and second, by
challenging them to (a) show some connection to the curriculum that was
worth over half a semester and (b) to show how they had taught the
significance of this item to the current cultural environment. They could
answer neither question between them. I asked them a few other
social-studies-related questions along the way, only to demonstrate the
depth of knowledge of our social studies department.
This matter had risen not from my concern over the quality of teaching,
since I already knew where that was, but over my concern that all 7th grade
students were required to carry, among other things, a pair of scissors,
which were, by school district policy included among contraband items. The
Social Studies department could not justify this breach of policy. The
following fall, 4 of the 7 teacher were assigned to different schools and
the one's contract was not renewed.
I was as disappointed as anyone could be after my public school experience.
When I was in these schools (the same ones, by the way) teachers lived in
the neighborhood, and I walked to school with a couple of them every
morning. The teacher not only knew their respective subjects, but the
English teachers could help with questions about math or science, and the
principal spoke very elegant Engish. Even the gym teachers were up to date
on world events and could tell you what city was the capitol of Burma.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: sjm <sethm(a)loomcom.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, March 10, 2000 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: Re: languages (Teachers)
>
>On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 08:58:43AM -0700, Richard Erlacher wrote:
>> Another thing to keep in mind about these jobs is that not only is the
>> summer vacation long, but there are plenty of days without kids in the
>> building, when most teachers go skiing or golfing, or hot-tubbing, and
the
>> workday for most of them is less than 6 hours.
>>
>> Dick
>
>I think it's extremely unfair to label all teachers like this.
>You make them sound lazy. I know only one highschool teacher today,
>but I do know he works his ass off. He does NOT take the summer off,
>he takes summer teaching contracts to make ends meet. After teaching
>his classes he has, further courses of his own to attend, papers to
>grade, lesson plans to work out, staff meetings, conference meetings,
>parent-teacher meetings, and inbetween tons of shit none of us
>would want to deal with dumped on him. Sometimes he doesn't get
>home until 11:00 -- and neither do I, but at least I get paid for it.
>
>I attended public school between 1979 and 1992, in both California
>and Connecticut. We moved around frequently, and I was in 8
>different schools during that time. That's a lot of different school
>systems, and a lot of different teachers. Yes, I had some that were
>merely doing their job, not going the extra mile. And I think I
>can probably put my finger on exactly one who I would honestly call
>lazy (everybody has a teacher horror story to tell). But those who
>stand out in my mind were the genuine heros. They were IN to what
>they did. They LOVED the kids. They latched on to us and energized
>us and really taught us. They made us solve problems, they made us
>work together, they made us look forward to their classes every day.
>They had a passion for what they did, and God bless them for it.
>
>I can't think of a more honorable profession.
>
>-Seth
-----Original Message-----
From: thomas.h.lindberg(a)se.abb.com <thomas.h.lindberg(a)se.abb.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, February 10, 2000 6:37 AM
Subject: Re: Dumpster stories!
>
>
>A coule of years ago we had two very tragic dumpster stories in Sweden,
>three kids vere killed while reading magazines in covered
>newspaper/magazine dumpsters.
>The kids had seaked in through the narrow opening where we dump our old
>newspapers/magazines and sat there while the truck came to pick up the
>dumpster content. The dumpster was automatically emptied into a compacter
>at the truck and all taken to the fragmentation site where the kids wer
>found crushed.
>The dumpster openings are now just about the size of a mail box.
>
I can't believe some list members here dive into dumpsters for computers.
That's dangerous. There could be dangerous,sharp items inside some. Toxic
residues (not all companies respect the environment), Legal reasons (maybe?)
not to enter one.
There are so many better ways to find old computers in much better condition
than something thrown into a dumpster with everything else piled on top.
john
PDP-8 and other rare mini computers
http://www.pdp8.com
>Thomas
>
>
>