I still have a floor mount style MicroPDP11/73 chassis in Kansas City. I
used the machine several time but mainly it sat in the garage next to the
microvax2000 and PDP 11/23+. When I ran out of space because of 2 new
Microvax II's and extra disk drives I decided to sell it to somebody on this
list. I sold the boards and the purchaser didn't want the chassis because
of the weight and size. You all can fight over it, $10 plus you pay
shipping I'll provide packing and transport to the FedEx pickup for free.
Mike
mmcfadden(a)cmh.edu
The highest unsuccessful bid was also for $700 by
someone with a feedback rating of 232. He didn't
succeed because the winner had placed his $700 bid
the day before.
There were four bids for >$600, and one for $250.
(from http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewBids&item=359971659)
I do think it was the well-written description and
all the pictures that pushed the price up into the
stratosphere.
--Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Dwight Elvey
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 12:40 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: $700 TRS-80???
"Passer, Michael" <PasserM(a)umkc.edu> wrote:
> I saw that one too--it had to be the description!
>
Hi
Did anyone ask the bidders why they went so high?
There may be a valid reason. Looking at the other bidders
history, the next higher bidder was a regular buyer.
The winning bid was by someone that has made no other
purchases. He could have been a fake and wanted to see
how high things would go. I would be quite interested
to see how the sale goes through. The buyer has also
resently changed his handle. Makes one wonder?
Dwight
From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
>The original TRS-80 Level 1, 4K, with monitor and cassette was $599.
The
>level 2 WAS $700, wasn't it?
Initially then it was dropped in price. I thik the 4k/L1 went down to
$399
and the 16k/LII was $599 later on.
Either way there were some 300-400 thousand of them sold! In the first
year of sales the total sold was 250,000! Rare, hardly.
What would be rare is a completely stock system with a real working
early model expansion interface!!!
Allison
Does anyone out there have a boot disk, software
and/or documentation for the Wang Professional
Computer?
I liberated one of these from a local thrift store
for the grand sum of $2.97 (keyboard, monitor,
and computer/drives all individually priced @ 99c).
It appears to be in working order--startup
diagnostics and the keyboard work fine. The
monochrome display is one of the nicest ones
I've seen.
An interesting note is that the startup ROM contains
an option to boot the machine from the serial port!
Thanks for anything anyone might be able to spare--
I am, of course, willing to pay shipping plus a
reasonable amount for the time involved, particularly
if someone copies me a boot disk.
Mike Passer
passerm(a)umkc.edu
several messages:
>> If in fact it truly requires specialized equipment and this hacker
>> can demonstrate that it doesn't, I'm at a loss to understand why said
>> hacker is unemployed save by choice.
>
>With all due respect, Chris, and acknowledging that this may vary
>from region to region, the ability to find gainful employment
>has less to do with one's technical skills than it does with the
>balance of one's employment skills and personality. For example,
I'd agree, I looked for two years in the other H-1B capital eastern MA,
and no one was interested in me. I saw who they were hiring, and
they were young, male and going cheap. Emplyment right now is a
game, everyone is looking for a few and the wnat list if bizzare. The
best example, a local comms firm wanted techs (not engineers) that
had a minimum of BS in Math and 2 years DSP experience!
Allison
From: Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com>
>This is such a crock, if you want a cheap computer do the same thing you
>did before eBay, turn over a LOT of rocks. Just about everybody on this
>lists that is actively looking, ie making phone calls, driving places,
>etc., is still finding a LOT of computers.
Amen!
In the last year for free and not actively sought...
Coleco Adam from the trash
Zenith Xt laptop "here you want it, or the trash"
Hyndai 286LT laptop in the trash, works!
486dx/66 system even 4x cdrom complete, if I didn't take it
guess what... the trash.
and other odds and ends. Granted the PC stuff is mostly for giving away
as I don't need it all.
There is stuff to be found the trick is to catch it before it's landfill
in
many cases. Maybe it's me but far to much good hardware is going
landfill.
Allison
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Charles P. Hobbs (SoCalTip) wrote:
> An aside: It's amazing, how some people over on E-bay, will add "Imsai
> Altair" to descriptions of all these non-descript S-100 computer boxes
> and parts. Of course, nobody is fooled, and the prices stay low. (Same
> with
Well, the prices staying low must be a new thing. There's a reason they
put "Altair IMSAI" on their ads, that being that lots of people would fall
for it for lack of an understanding of recent computer history (i.e.
suckers).
Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
VCF 4.0 is September 30-October 1
San Jose Convention Center, San Jose, California
See http://www.vintage.org for details!
IMHO, it's arrogant to think that ANY old computers (other than a few very
rare exceptions) are all that "valuable". If all the TRS-80s, ALTAIRS,
SWTPs, all the documentation, and software, etc... were to disappear
tomorrow, life as we know it would not change.
The reason that I collect is that I enjoy tinkering with and restoring old
machines. It has nothing to do with monitary gain, historical preservation,
mentoring children about the "old ways", or saving the world from the loss
of some irreplacable techno-saur. With the exception of "monitary gain" all
the other reasons above are BS!
Frankly I do have enough money to buy almost any computer I want and I do
buy from E-Bay. I also buy from garage sales, flee markets, thrift stores,
and other collectors. I have driven as much as 800 miles to pick up a system
that I particularily wanted but, I have NEVER paid too much. I've always
paid EXACTLY what I was willing to pay. The good thing about forums like
Ebay is that they give you the opportunity to set the price that you are
wiling to pay. If someone else is willing to pay more, so be it.
Sure I've been disapppointed because I didn't get a system that I was
bidding on but, so what. By the same token, I found a system that is the
only surviving member of it's species for $50. Is it irreplacable? Sure it's
irreplacable because there aren't any more. Would it really matter if I
tossed it in the trash? Maybe to a few people on this list but other than
that... not really.
Before anyone goes on another rant about throwing a machine in the trash,
let's take a poll:
Assuming I was to offer it for free, who on this list (other than captain
napalm who's only 10 miles away) would drive to South Florida to pick it up?
Steve Robertson
> > Try telling it to the unemployed hardware hacker who's figured out how
to
> > fix things that the manufacturer claimed could only be repaired at their
> > factory with special equipment.
>
> If in fact it truly requires specialized equipment and this hacker
> can demonstrate that it doesn't, I'm at a loss to understand why said
> hacker is unemployed save by choice.
With all due respect, Chris, and acknowledging that this may vary
>from region to region, the ability to find gainful employment
has less to do with one's technical skills than it does with the
balance of one's employment skills and personality. For example,
it's far more important to my employer that I wear a crisp shirt
and tie each day than that I know trend <x> or technology <z>
(unless I hadn't said so before, I'm a programmer working as a
system administrator; long story behind why). YMMV, etc.
-doug q
> Not true. Nearly every museum will welcome volunteers with open arms, and
> as long as the artifcats are not abused, they can be worked on and used.
> Just about anyone on this list is welcome at RCS/RI to play with any of
> our machines. Once we know people well enough, machines can be taken home
> on a loan basis. In this we are not some odd organization - many museums
> work exactly in this fashion. And the price is zero.
Bill-
While it really helps to have "live" organizational skills,
I think a group of organizationally-challenged folk could
do wonders if they had a roadmap to follow, and from the
sounds of it, you & Merle & Co. have put together something
special.
Have you considered writing up either your experiences in
putting the RCS/RI together, or even better, something
closer to a step-by-step guide to finding the interested
local parties and what to look for in terms of facilities
(lots of space & separately derived 3-phase power systems
are obvious; other things are less so).
It may never happen here in the Louisville area (whatever
critical mass of interest is required may or may not be
present), but I'd like to try getting it started. We have
a Museum of Science and Technology, but it's all mass-public
stuff, IMAX Theatre, etc.
-doug q
I'll be off-list for a while due to an upcoming vacation. Back soon!
73 de WD6EOS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our
own human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Sudbrink <bill(a)chipware.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 11:55 AM
Subject: $700 TRS-80???
>Can anyone explain to me why a TRS-80 model 1 level 2, no expansion
>box or floppies, just the base unit, ps and monitor, would sell for
>$700 US? There were several bidders willing to go over $600.
Stupidity.
>There are several more, more complete, systems on ebay right now in
>the $20-$60 range. There's also one with a $460 starting bid and
>no bidders. Is there something I'm missing on this one?
buy the cheap one. ;)
Allison
Obviously you are looking in the wrong places if the price of equipment
is too high for you nor are you looking at the "big picture"...
Sure, I use eBay, but only for stuff that's cheap, if it is too
expensive I look for things other people don't know about or haven't
thought of collecting yet. (My BASIC games book collection is doing
nicely, thank you.)
If I can't get stuff on eBay cheap, then I scour the thrift stores, yard
sales, newsgroups, shows like VCF, etc. If computer X is too expensive,
I wait, heck, in 5 years I'll probably get one, I'm in no rush...
(thats how I got most of my computers cheap, either buy it new in stores
or wait a few years till it's lifespan brings it to Salvation Army...)
Also if you have the webspace available - do justice to your favorite
collection and help others, this is not only a status symbol for the
collector but also let's visitors know that if they clean out their
closet of classic stuff/info, there is a place they can send it to who
will appreciate it and use it to assist others. (yes, I have received a
few contributions and am very appreciative.) But of course if you fall
into the "beanie babie" - collect for investment croud, that advice is a
moot point.
There are alot of aspects to a computer collection, not just the
machines; there is the software, cables, controllers, peripherals,
manuals, books, magazines, ads, stickers, buttons, etc... (in fact some
of the software, manuals books and magazines are probably more rewarding
to find than some of the computers...)
> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:34:33 -0700
> From: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com>
> Subject: Re: Is it time for an International Vintage Computer
> Association? Was: Yo
>
> At 07:46 PM 6/27/00 +0100, Tony wrote:
> >I've seen it said (in print) several times that various hobbies were
> >ruined when the rich got involved and simply started pouring money in.
>
> Sounds a bit like the joke, "What that place? Nobody goes there
> anymore,
> its too crowded!"
>
> - --Chuck
--
01000011 01001111 01001101 01001101 01001111 01000100 01001111 01010010 01000101
Larry Anderson - Sysop of Silicon Realms BBS (209) 754-1363
300-14.4k bps
Classic Commodore pages at: http://www.jps.net/foxnhare/commodore.html
01000011 01001111 01001101 01010000 01010101 01010100 01000101 01010010 01010011
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:40:31 -0400 (EDT) William Donzelli
<aw288(a)osfn.org> writes:
> So what? At least some people can afford to go. For a lucky few, it
> might just be a short trip in the car. Better a few than none...
If you can afford it, go. My point is that despite organized
efforts, not everyone will have access (for various reasons).
This isn't the promoter's fault; it's usually a matter of
geography.
> How about real museums?
Nice, but individual ownership is a much more valuable experience
(to the individual). Not possible once these systems become
'Museum Pieces'.
> How about speadiung knowledge - informing the public and each
> other about the history?
We have forums like this one. But I guess you'll *need* an
'official' organization now: It's becomming apparent that only
certain opinions are now considered 'acceptable'.
> How about saving hardware and software that is out of the reach
> af any individual?
Groups of caring individuals have always worked together towards
this end. In the past, the money wasn't a motivation. I don't
know if this will reman the case in the future.
> How about professional recognition?
I always figured that the real {hobbyists | enthusiasts} weren't
(by definition) 'professionals'. The original developers? Write
one a letter, thanking them for their contribution. I did.
How about security for our collections?
Keep your {door|gate|porticullis} locked.
> > And I'm saying, all you will be doing is raising the cost of
> > admission. There's nothing anyone can do to stop you, of course.
> > If Classic Computing becomes a 'legitimate' hobby with a
> 'legitimate'
> > organization, then I guess there won't be room for amateurs
> > like myself. You professional 'true historical preservationists'
> > can have it.
>
> Jeff, take your stinking attitude and get out of town. Please. The
> one thing that hurts retrocomputing more than anything else is someone
> like you.
You know, I could get really angry at this last remark, but it just
makes me sad. (Retro)computing was a 'joy' thing. It was so
awesome because just about anyone could experience it. It was
really something special because it's only major cost was the time
and effort you put into it.
What really mattered was what came from the heart, really.
What really matters now, is what comes from the wallet.
I guess it really wasn't so special afterall.
Bye.
Jeff
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
> Okay, if you want to take that tack on the subject, let's go:
> So you're saying that only the rich and powerful are *worthy* of
> a such as noble endeavor such as ours?
Jeff, I'm using your quote as a starting point, please
don't think I'm picking on you.
Well, somewhere between rich and poor (I tend to count
myself the latter), there must be middle ground. My
current focus is on Primes, and I'm playing fast-and-
loose with my bills (as well as selling things I'd
rather keep) to try to get this system to a certain
point where I'll feel comfortable with.
However, had I managed to save that MicroPDP-11/73
>from the Jaws of Greed, I would likely have simply
held on to it until I could find a better home for
it. Strictly speaking, I'd say that's collecting
and not preservationist. But at least I'd have kept
it from the landfill.
Ideally, the poor collectors amongst us can do
lots of that. But I think it's incumbent upon us
to be ready to give up posession to someone who
can do the item more justice than we can.
I think a phrase commonly stated about relationships
might be applicable here. Rephrased: If you love
something, let it go. I'm letting go of at least
one of two unfinished SOL motherboards very, very
soon (but my original working SOL I will keep).
As to the rich: by virtue of your economic power,
you might easily fall into the trap of compulsive
acquisition. Fewer constraints hold you back, and
so the ID runs wild.
Had the Evil Lurker been restoring a personal system
with the parts he was looking for, it would not have
bothered me a wit. I'd like to take solace in knowing
there's a good chance someone restoring a system will
see the parts he has for sale, and buy them. But I'm
afraid they'll just enter a nonterminating speculative
loop.
So, to the rich, let me say this: try to be aware of
what's going on around you, and if you see you're
trying to acquire something that some poor guy is
also going for, remember, this may be his only chance,
and you'll likely have another. And to the poor guys
(like me), I say: be willing to give something up
to someone who can actually get it going sooner
than the 20 years it might take you due to your
more limited financial resources.
Just my tuppence' worth... regards, -doug q
> What if the machines are to be scrapped in a hurry, and no one can take
> the whole thing? I would think that gutting the things is the best
> option. A few parts are better than nothing...
>
> I have done this - specifically with a VAX-11/750 and 4D/380. These were
> advertised on this list in the very early days, but I was apparently the
> only one that could even get close to the machines. Needless to say, I
> couldn't take the machines as a whole, so the cards were pulled.
If that's the only choice- landfill or reduction to parts- sure,
reduce it to parts.
Sometimes, there's middle ground...
-dq
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > loop that doesn't respond at the speed of light. However, I
> > use delivery and read receipts on all my mail, and if I at
> > least get a receipt back, then I know I'm most likely "in
> > the queue". Failure to receive same leaves me wondering if
> > my message was even received. Not all ISPs and mailers support
>
> I'd be more worried if my message was received but then not replied to.
> I'd feel more comfortable if I didn't get a receipt yet. That would imply
> the person is too busy to even check e-mail yet.
Hmmm, I'd say it would imply the person really isn't very
technologically sophisticated...
"Does that little envelope mean I've got mail, or that I should
write some?"
-dq
> At 03:13 PM 6/27/00 -0400, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
> >Chuck was right about the guy that won the bid on
> >the MicroPDP-11/73... the buyer's name is Chris
> >Hoaglin, and all he is interested in is f*cking
> >up a working computer to end up with parts he
> >can sell to fund his greedy little schemes. He
> >wants the backplane and all the cards. I wish the
> >seller would have said NO, but that was not to be.
>
> I'm sorry but I can't agree with the sentiment here.
I appear to have been guilty of projecting, in this
case, reading into your previous remarks what I was
feeling.
Sorry.
I'm desparately looking for parts, but I'd sooner
cut off a limb than rob them from a working system
until _every_ effort has been made to find a good
home for that system. This one appeared to be lacking
an OS (or anything for it to reside on) but I see that
as minor compared to systems with disfunctional stuff
in the backplace.
But I gotta admit, I'm making way too much noise over
a doggone PDP-11 when they aren't my forte to begin
with.
At least I get the tape drive.
regards,
-doug q
>Had the Evil Lurker been restoring a personal system
>with the parts he was looking for, it would not have
>bothered me a wit.
On the gripping hand, I know of some "collectors" (as
in they acquire large amounts of stuff without looking for
commercial gain) who will, for example, rip all the boards out of
a working VAX 8650 but leave the chassis behind, because they have
no way of hauling the chassis cabinets nor a place to put them. As
far as I can tell, nobody wins here, because a working 8650 was turned
into a pile of nearly-worthless parts that will simply sit in the basement
for a couple of decades. Does this stop the offenders? Of course not!
Tim.
Chuck was right about the guy that won the bid on
the MicroPDP-11/73... the buyer's name is Chris
Hoaglin, and all he is interested in is f*cking
up a working computer to end up with parts he
can sell to fund his greedy little schemes. He
wants the backplane and all the cards. I wish the
seller would have said NO, but that was not to be.
FWIW, I was going to steal one part- the plexiglass
door of the TS05 tape drive- to put in place of
a broken one on a Cipher. The broken Cipher door
works, even broken, and will still work when glued
back together- it will just look like sh*t. How-
ever, I would have either preserved the system in
all other ways, or even tried restoring it.
Well, souless b*st*rds are prolifigate, and some
are circling overhead like vultures.
The only good note: I'll get the TS05 for US$5.00.
I doubt I'll take the rack. Perhaps someday I'll
need a part from the TS05 (assuming it *IS* really
a Cipher streamer inside).
Oh well. Hi ho.
-doug quebbeman
> And I'm saying, all you will be doing is raising the cost of
> admission. There's nothing anyone can do to stop you, of course.
> If Classic Computing becomes a 'legitimate' hobby with a 'legitimate'
> organization, then I guess there won't be room for amateurs
> like myself. You professional 'true historical preservationists'
> can have it.
Do we need 'true historical preservationists'? Maybe. Does that mean
that the priorities of the 'true preservationists' will be the same as
those who actually worked with the systems or still use the systems?
Of course not. In fact, the priorities will probably be vastly different
between the two groups, and this is all the better reason for both groups
to co-exist, probably with at least a bit of animosity towards each other.
How do priorities differ, even among "hobby" preservationists?
Several ways:
1. Some insist on a pristine as-shipped-from-the-manufacturer system,
with no third-party peripherals or software, and others realize
that in real life there were very few such configurations
and instead preserve the systems as they were actually installed,
with third-party peripherals and software abounding.
2. Some only care about CPU's, and will travel hundreds or thousands
of miles to pick up the CPU box, and leave the peripherals
(necessary to boot the OS!) behind. Others put more emphasis
on getting a few complete working systems rather than a bunch
of CPU boxes that can't ever be booted.
3. Some haul away hardware, and leave a mountain of magtapes
behind with the operating system, etc. Others haul away hardware
and tapes and disks but leave the books behind. Others just
want the books, others just want the tapes.
I've seen every single one of the above characteristics exhibited by
"amateur" collectors, and every single one of the above possibilities
exhibited by "professional" collectors.
Personally, I fall into the "put any old hardware together that makes
a system work, don't care whether it's original or third party, get
complete systems with peripherals, and spend lots of time archiving
the software" category. Every person on this list probably falls
into a different category. I may not agree with everyone's priorities,
but in some sense a wide range of priorities from a wide range of people
is a *probably* a good thing.
Tim.
> A few thoughts on this;
>
> 1) Don't make public posts questioning a vendors integrity prior to making
> a good effort to settle the issue privately. This will include waiting
more
> than two business days for a reply.
I went back and carefully read what I posted; a strict deconstruction
of your phrase "questioning a vendor's integrity" does not seem to
apply to what I said. I thought the tone of my post was respectful
if somewhat apprehensive. I did not question his integrity; I merely
related my experience and queried others as to theirs.
And as to waiting two business days, let me say this. We all
tend to expect instant results from anything involving a
computer, forgetting that a human component is still in the
loop that doesn't respond at the speed of light. However, I
use delivery and read receipts on all my mail, and if I at
least get a receipt back, then I know I'm most likely "in
the queue". Failure to receive same leaves me wondering if
my message was even received. Not all ISPs and mailers support
receipts, I know; as to the ISP problem, scripts can provide
the equivalent function. For mailers, all that's required is
to switch to a different mailer. If anyone finds the receipts
distasteful, they can decline to use them, but they risk what
almost happened in this case.
To summarize, had I gotten a receipt, I'd have waited as
patiently as is possible for me, but I'd have waited.
> 2) DOA happens on old drives, so do a dozen other end user mess ups that
> keep them from spinning up or working. The drive could be fine, and you
> just have a wimpy power supply or a jumper set wrong.
Bzzt. Sorry, nope. The power supply is driving two diff SCSI drives
that are full-height 5.25 inch units (HP 97548's, I believe). No
way a wimpy 3.5 half-height drive is sucking more juice.
> 3) Look at the ad terms carefully, not wishfully. Does it say 100% tested,
> or just no DOA? If the latter it may be he has a stack of "mostly" good
> drives and no desire to test them before shipping at $15 each.
It said "just not DOA", and the drive was just plain DOA.
regards,
-doug quebbeman
>And to my ears, there's nothing like a full-bore Hammond being
driven by Jon Lord from Deep Purple. Nobody, but nobody gets that
angry, hulking, growling sound from an organ like Lord.
Before I quit I tried to get that sound... no idea how he did that.
Speaking of Tomita....on his "Bermuda Triangle" album (mine is on
blue vinyl......) he included an encoded message that required
Majorly cool color.
someone with a Tarbell cassette interface to read. I never had the
necessary equipment, and it's always bugged me as to what the
message was. Has anyone here ever decoded it?
I ment to. The cut FYI from playing with other "floppy roms"
has to be very clean and right on pitch. IA or was it byte did
a few of them as tryouts. Marginally successful.
I'm not familiar with Subotnick. What is his style? Is it more like
Carlos, Tomita, or Fast? Or, something completely different?
Little of all, different than all.
We should talk in terms of how old computers were used
for music or declare this the official off topic thread. We
always seem to have one and often they are as interesting
as any even if they are OT.
Allison
Paul Braun WD9GCO
Cygnus Productions
nerdware_nospam(a)laidbak.com
> Why not will it to the Computer Museum History Center?
>
> http://www.computerhistory.org
>
> hat's what I intend to do with mine.
It's not enough to just will your collection or some
part of it to the Computer Museum History Center...
unless you also provide for the shipping/transport
of your bequest from wherever it is to the Moffet
Field operation, as they lack the funds to do so
themselves.
Everyone, please bear this in mind. Make sure a
few $$$ remain to cover shipping & handling!
-dq
On 26-Jun-00, you wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Gary Hildebrand wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, Mark, I already have one, to which I just added a Sidecar. I
think I
>
> Did you ever get the Sidecar to work?
Did a bench test w/o the amiga, and didn't see any smoke (good sign?). I
heard the HD make its expected noises, so at this point in time, I think the
PC part works. Might have a prob in the shared memory part going to the
Amiga. I have to clear out an area on the bench to set up everything.
>
>
Regards
--
Gary Hildebrand
Box 6184
St. Joseph, MO 64506-0184
816-662-2612
or
ghldbrd(a)ccp.com
>I do think it was the well-written description and
>all the pictures that pushed the price up into the
>stratosphere.
Very true. I remember trying to give some stuff (a bunch of
42" racks, old 14" disk drives, etc.) away five or so years ago, and
nobody was interested. But then I attached a price and got several
folks to show up to take it away.
Tim.
I saw that one too--it had to be the description!
--Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Bill Sudbrink
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 10:48 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: $700 TRS-80???
Can anyone explain to me why a TRS-80 model 1 level 2, no expansion
box or floppies, just the base unit, ps and monitor, would sell for
$700 US? There were several bidders willing to go over $600.
There are several more, more complete, systems on ebay right now in
the $20-$60 range. There's also one with a $460 starting bid and
no bidders. Is there something I'm missing on this one?
URL for the auction:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=359971659
Bill
Can anyone explain to me why a TRS-80 model 1 level 2, no expansion
box or floppies, just the base unit, ps and monitor, would sell for
$700 US? There were several bidders willing to go over $600.
There are several more, more complete, systems on ebay right now in
the $20-$60 range. There's also one with a $460 starting bid and
no bidders. Is there something I'm missing on this one?
URL for the auction:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=359971659
Bill
> > I ment to. The cut FYI from playing with other "floppy roms"
> > has to be very clean and right on pitch. IA or was it byte did
> > a few of them as tryouts. Marginally successful.
>
> Damn, I can't remember the name of the magazine but it wasn't Byte and I'm
> having trouble figuring out what IA is, but at any rate I have those
> issues with the floppy ROMs still intact.
Jim Warren's Interface Age magazine (successor to the journal
of the Southern California Computer Society's SCCS Interface)...?
-doug q
> Speaking of Tomita....on his "Bermuda Triangle" album (mine is on
> blue vinyl......) he included an encoded message that required
>
> Majorly cool color.
>
> someone with a Tarbell cassette interface to read. I never had the
> necessary equipment, and it's always bugged me as to what the
> message was. Has anyone here ever decoded it?
I'm not sure who I'm replying to, as someone's quoting mechanism
is working even worse than Outlook's....
But what a coincidence that I'm planning to put a Tarbell
Casette Interface up on E-Bay today. My reserve price will
be $100, and while it does not include documentation, and
I have not tested it, I am including a 1983 Tarbell Electronics
catalog (ok, big woo).
I thought I'd post here in case someone didn't want to fight
the traffic; plus it'd save me a few bucks for the posting.
-doug q
-----Original Message-----
From: John R. Keys Jr. <jrkeys(a)concentric.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, June 26, 2000 4:01 PM
Subject: Do I look Rich ?
>Had a guy e-mail me that wanted to sell a Osborne (do not which model)
>but he wanted $3,500 and was not sure if it worked. That's what happens
>when you get your name in the paper. If anyone else wants it let me
>know.
>John Keys
>
Did you tell him that computers are an investment that don't normally
appreciate from their original purchase price (with the possible exception
of Apple Is and Altairs)? Tell him I'll sell him an equally collectible
Amiga 1000 for a very reasonable $2500.
Seriously though, if anyone on-list want an original A1000 in its original
box, with original keyboard but a replacement mouse (copies of Kickstart
and WB 1.2 included, no manuals) I have one available. I'll take Amiga or
Atari ST software (or most anything else Amiga-related) in trade.
Cheers,
Mark.
>to Clockwork Orange (still as Walter). By the time of
>Tron, Walter had become Wendy.
Your dates and music are misaligned. the "Walter"
was not used during the period and was neither played
up or down. It was a itlem of convenience of the record
compmanies. However by then it was history.
I know as I have all the albums as originals bought when
they were originally released and have kept a Yamaha
belt drive going for real music. ;)
She is one of many talents that took electronics and
rather than make Rover howl, did achieve serious music.
Allison
> Has anyone done business with Richard Meyers
> of Meyers Computer Services (Jersey Shore, PA)?
Ok, I called him, he called me back, VERY busy
guy, good intentions, is sending me another unit.
He tested this one to make sure it at least spins
up (it was strange that while the auction ad made
no mention of whether the drive had or had not been
tested, that they still offered a 2-day DOA warranty).
For my part, I'd decided that if a second unit is
bad, hey, it was only $15.00, so no real harm done.
But getting a working one means a lot, so I'm
hoping this one will be good.
At any rate, I feel safe saying that this guy
runs a good business, and I'll probably buy
>from him again, should the opportunity arise,
whether the second unit works or not.
-doug q
Has anyone done business with Richard Meyers
of Meyers Computer Services (Jersey Shore, PA)?
Here's why I ask...
After the many invectives launched here towards
E-bay (but prior to my post defending them), I
decided to check out haggle.com. Almost right off
the bat, I found something I wanted for a great
price- a Seagate 11200ND diff SCSI drive. I won
the item, and received it on Wednesday.
It was Friday before I got around to trying it-
and it's DOA. Won't spin up; I can hear what might
be the heads trying to unpark, or maybe it's the
drive motor trying to start. But negatory.
Additionally, three SMD devices appear to have been
removed from the drive's interface PCB. Very strange.
I sent him e-mail on Friday w/r/t its status as DOA;
the description for the item gave it a 2-day DOA
warranty. He appears to be very busy; I spoke to
a subordinate, who took my info and said he'd
contact mr. meyers about it, and I'd be contacted
back.
All the feedback on haggle for him is glowing;
I'm willing to believe he really is a busy guy
and that he (or a subordinate) just grabbed a
drive off the wrong pile and shipped it to me.
An honest mistake.
Should I be apprehensive about this? Hey, I'd
only be out $15 if I get no resolution, so it's
not going to be the end of the world.
Just thought I'd ask before I cop an attitude...
tia,
-doug q
> Had a guy e-mail me that wanted to sell a Osborne (do not which model)
> but he wanted $3,500 and was not sure if it worked. That's what happens
> when you get your name in the paper. If anyone else wants it let me
> know.
John-
You just need to polish up your social engineering skills. ;-)
I got a Prime 2455 for shipping costs only; the owner wanted...
...drum roll, please...
ten thousand american dollars for this wonderful little machine.
The process did entail one $25 phone call to Arizona, and a few
shorter/cheaper ones, listening to his anxiety over marrying off
the first of his daughters (late, at age 29), and such. But it
paid off.
-doug q
But you also had quite a few freebies after the article. So I guess that it
was mostly positive. And you probably had a good laugh when you read that
guys e-mail.
Let's do pizza or something
Francois
PS: Yeah you must be rich, You were in the paper:)
>Had a guy e-mail me that wanted to sell a Osborne (do not which model)
>but he wanted $3,500 and was not sure if it worked. That's what happens
>when you get your name in the paper. If anyone else wants it let me
>know.
>John Keys
>
Had a guy e-mail me that wanted to sell a Osborne (do not which model)
but he wanted $3,500 and was not sure if it worked. That's what happens
when you get your name in the paper. If anyone else wants it let me
know.
John Keys
> ...three SMD devices appear to have been removed
>
> Sure they're not just board options that
> weren't placed?
Pads for unplaced devices have a decidedly different
appearance (in my experience) than what I see here.
Usually, the pads are shiny with solder, a remnant
I assume of wave soldering or some other similar
manufacturing technology. For a given device, a
few lead pads will be shiny, some *black*, and some
kinda look lke they've been pulled up off the board.
Sombody had a steady hand, I'll say that for sure.
Either that, or these chips blew themselves off
the board.
I wish I had a photomicroscope so I could take a
picture- you'd see what I mean.
As I said in my post, I'm assuming he gets lots
of these, and he just grabbed this one off the
wrong pile.
-dq
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
> I'm working even more blindly than usual, so could you give me a clue and
> at least describe the basic topology of the PSU.
I wish. I don't actually have one of these power supplies in front of
me right now, just a couple of so-so printed copies of photos showing
what it should look like with the top cover off. One photo for the
configuration that supports battery backup, one photo for the
configuration that doesn't.
You can see the latter (which shows what I think rdd has) at
http://www.reanimators.org/tmp/1000E-ps.jpeg -- it's about
50KB. Maybe this will help you more than it helps me.
What I don't see in the photos is the big transformer-like hunk of
iron that I'd expect in a linear power suppply, and the dark spaces
don't look big enough to hold one. So I'm thinking it's a switcher.
-Frank McConnell
Hello All,
When I create an empty RM03 under Bob's emulator witht the badblock
option and then mount it under RSX, it complains, telling me that
it is an alignment pack! Is there a way to get around this problem?
Using FMT does not help either, a similar message is returned.
When using RT-11, INI doesn't do anything, it just hangs.
Thanks,
Ed
--
The Wanderer | Geloof nooit een politicus!
wanderer(a)bos.nl | Europarlementariers: zakken-
http://www.bos.nl/homes/wanderer | vullers en dumpplaats voor
Unix Lives! windows95/98 is rommel! | mislukte politici.
'96 GSXR 1100R / '97 TL1000S |
See http://www.bos.nl/homes/wanderer/gates.html for a funny pic. of
Gates!
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 06:09:36PM +0000, wanderer wrote:
>When I create an empty RM03 under Bob's emulator witht the badblock
>...
>When using RT-11, INI doesn't do anything, it just hangs.
John Wilson asked:
>With what driver?
Pre-V5.5 versions of RT-11 come with the "DP:" driver, but this
doesn't do RM03's, just RP02's and RP03's. It wouldn't suprise
me if it got confused when you hooked a RM03 (real or emulated)
to a system and tried to access it with the "DP:" driver, but
that's "operator error".
There are several DECUS-distributed RM03 device drivers for RT-11,
and there were also a couple of commercial ones sold by third parties
in the 1980's. The most likely DECUS driver is library entry 11-517,
"System Device Handler For RM02, RM03, RP04, RP05, RP06 and RT-11 V4".
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:48:37 -0400 Douglas Quebbeman
<dhquebbeman(a)theestopinalgroup.com> writes:
> I guess that's probably an unfair remark, but someone
> who lurked on that auction until I went to sleep last
> night beat me by a dollar. I knew that could happen
> but I was hoping it wouldn't. Thus go the perils of
> bidding at auctions.
I always bid using a high-powered rifle w/telescopic sight.
;^)
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
I guess that's probably an unfair remark, but someone
who lurked on that auction until I went to sleep last
night beat me by a dollar. I knew that could happen
but I was hoping it wouldn't. Thus go the perils of
bidding at auctions.
So, I want to thank everyone for the very useful
suggestions on transporting the unit. It would
eventually have been fun to play with, even though
my interest in DEC is pretty much limited to the
DEC-10, and since DEC had enough trouble keeping
them running, no way I'd try if I could even find
one.
Speaking of the DEC-10, Paul Allen was going to
put a TOAD online running TOPS-10; does anyone
know if that ever came about?
-dq
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
> > Speaking of the DEC-10, Paul Allen was going to
> > put a TOAD online running TOPS-10; does anyone
> > know if that ever came about?
>
> I know that some folks have accounts and use the machine -
> I should have sent my request in when
> the offer was originally posted.... :-(
Well, it sounds like somebody is keeping the electricity
turned on... Gee, I was going to offer Paul my copy of
the DEC-10 Commands Manual (this is the heavier paper
version, not the "phone book" styled pub) for perpetual
access. Now I guess it's E-bay destined...
-dq
Whatever happened to CHAC (The Computer History Association of
California)? I haven't heard anything from them, nor seen new issues
of their journal, in several years now.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
I found the soundtrack to Tron on vinyl at a local thrift shop today.
It's in nearly prefect condition. Did I score?
Too bad I don't have a record player so I can listen to it :(
Sellam International Man of Intrigue and Danger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
Coming soon: VCF 4.0!
VCF East: Planning in Progress
See http://www.vintage.org for details!
>My interests there stem from over 40 years' association with Laurens
>Hammond's invention back in the 30's. which by definition is the one of
the
>earliest known 'synthesizers' with a very user-friendly interface. Too bad
>they are so danged heavy. I have three of them: B3, M3 and X77.
Let me know if you need any parts or manuals on these. I used to service
them and when I sold the business about 20 years ago, I kept the manuals and
the parts I carried in my vehicle. I know I still have things like vibrato
scanner washers and mercotac's, etc.
Dan
Any information, general to specific, on the Motorola model M68SetDS351
all-in-one, dual 5.25 floppy drive, computer will be greatly
appreciated.
Yes, this is the one on eBay. I'm trying to decide if it is worth the
shipping cost.
Here's a picture of the machine:
http://www.wpic.com/whdawson/classiccmp/motorola.jpg
Thanks,
Bill Dawson
whdawson(a)mlynk.com <mailto:whdawson@mlynk.com>
?
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
[..snip..]
> >And if the Series Two is still vaporware, then all I can
> >say is that is a _very_ old tradition in the microcomputer
> >field,
>
> Sure is. This isn't the right way to evoke feelings of nostalgia in
> customers though!
ROFL!
-dq