> From: Glen Slick
> For the curious about the eBay market value of the PDP-11/20 today
That one was a once-in-a-lifetime thing, though: not only a KA11 in
absolutely pristine condition, but also an additional BA11 stuffed to the
gills with memory; the most complete set of original documentation I have
_ever_ seen with a computer that old; a complete H960 in perfect condition,
with all the blank panels, the rear door, etc; trays and trays of original
paper tape software, etc, etc.
When you consider that that PDP-11/70 that went a while back for $10K - and
-11/70's are a lot more common that -11/20's - I think this one was easily
worth what it went for.
I'm quite serious - I doubt we'll ever see another -11/20 in this good a
shape, and this complete, for sale, at least, not in my remaining lifetime.
Noel
Think it was add on box that went for the $$$$$! ---Ed#
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Glen Slick <glen.slick at gmail.com>
Date: 7/24/16 20:08 (GMT-07:00)
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Straight 8 up on Ebay just now
>
> Straight PDP-8
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/152171436497
>
> PDP-11/20
> http://www.ebay.com/itm/201624309371
For the curious about the eBay market value of the PDP-11/20 today, it
just sold for $5,655.55
After successfully repairing the G231 module of the MM11-L set I continued
with the next one. This one was not able to access addresses ending 0100
(binary). Luckily it was not the transistors arrays that were bad but the
selector chip. A Signetics N8251 chip.
I found a source on ebay at $4.95 each plus $13 shipping. A little bit to
much for my taste (although I could make an offer)
Anyone know of a cheaper source? I could use five or ten maybe.
/Mattis
I've finally started digging through all my stuff in storage, at least
in a small way. Two (or three) things I've found so far might be of
interest here. (There will likely be more eventually, but it's
anybody's guess when I'll find the round tuits to do more digging.)
- One DEC 54-17507. Google makes me think this is the Qbus backplane
from a BA123. It appears to be in good shape; while I am not set up
to test it, it looks pretty much "too simple to break". It consists
of the PCB, the Qbus connectors on one side, two 18-pin power
connectors and one ten-pin connector with blue plastic shroud on the
other side, and a piece of heavy sheet steel all this is bolted to.
(And the bolts, of course. :-) Oh, all four resistor packs are
installed.
- Two Sun type-4 keyboards. (Whether the list is two or three things
depends on whether you count these as one thing or two.) They are
somewhat age-yellowed, and one of them has some stain spots. All
the keys appear to work mechanically. I have a machine I can test
these with, but I will have to first dig out a suitable cable;
whether they are available now or later depends on whether you want
to wait for me to find a cable to test them.
These are in Ottawa (Canada's national capital, for those who don't
know the name or who want disambiguation) and are anyone's for the
claiming. In theory I can ship, but in practice I find I totally suck
at getting stuff shipped (I have two things pending shipping right now,
pending for long times), so you are much more likely to get something
soon if you can pick it up or give me a local(ish) place I can drop it
off, and if someone wants something shipped and someone else is
prepared to pick it up, I'm taking the easy-for-me option.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
I was digging around in storage and found a 965 board that is missing
its eproms. Does anyone have one handy that they could dump the proms from?
It's kind of unusual in that it uses a 65816 cpu. Seems to be a midway
design between the earlier 6502's and the later 68000's.
> Guess I should document all this in the Computer History Wiki
OK, done:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/PDP-11/24
> those prints (KT-24, and -11/24 backplane) would still be useful.
Big thanks for Al for putting the KT24 prints up - very good to have them.
> I guess it will require getting ahold of a backplane, and seeing what I
> can find out with an ohm-meter.
It looks like I'll still have to do this at some point, to confirm my
theories about how the two busses are wired on the backplane (separation of
UB and EUB address lines, and cross-connection of the data lines, for the
EUB/SPC slots), since we still don't have any backplane info.
Another mystery: The "PDP-11 UNIBUS Processor Handbook" (1985) says (pg. 4-10)
that in the 5.25" box, "only one MS11-P memory module can be
configured". Anyone know the cause/source of that restriction?
I don't think it can be the backplane; i) AFAIK, the 5.25" and 10.5" (for
which no limitation is stated) boxes use the same backplane, and ii) the 5.25"
box can take more of the smaller MS11-L cards (albeit, again, limited - to
three). So I don't think it can be 'the backplane doesn't carry all 22 address
lines to all EUB slots' (although I will check); and the CPU does drive all
22.
My next thought was that it's some power supply current issue, but on
checking, that board only uses +5V, and there's nothing about limiting the
number of ordinary boards when an MS11-P is in use. (I have to check the power
supply specs, and compare with the board power consumption specs, to make
completely positive there's no issue there.)
So I can't come up with any technical rationale for that limit? Am I missing
something? Or is it just DEC marketing, trying to limit how powerful the
machine can be?
Noel
I'm on the hunt for diskette images of DEC VAXmate software. From a
post to comp.sys.dec there appears to be at least the following
diskettes, but possibly more:
VAXmate MS-DOS version 3.10 for VAXmate Oper Environ V1.1
VAXMATE S/A INSTALL V1.1
VT240 EMULATOR UPDATE For VAXmate Oper Environ V1.1
VAXMATE INFO. SYSTEM V1.1 FOR VAXMATE OPER ENVIRON V1.1
VAXMATE MS-WINDOWS V1.03 (three disks)
If anyone has the diskettes or can point me somewhere to look, it
would be appreciated.
thanks.
Other notes:
If anyone is desperate to own a VAXmate I can provide contact details
of someone who has a few.
Here is my VAXmate running a generic MS-DOS 4.0, the screen is very
dim, and a few other pictures (as it arrived, so before any cleaning -
quote dusty inside):
https://goo.gl/photos/cQkbekoLiWBCZoad9
Hi,
I have got a 9845B which has a defective power supply unit - obviously a very common problem.
After replacing the cracking epoxy capacitors I found that the mains transformer seems to have a broken input winding.
Maybe someone tried to run it at 220V using the 110V input selector switch.
What I am now looking for is a defective PSU with a good transformer, resp. just the transformer which may also have been used in other HP devices..
The transformer is located on the PSU mother board between the two large capacitors.
It has the part number "9100-4037" and the date code "8-81" printed on it. It has two input windings and three output windings. Thus the output is a bit different (one additional winding compared to Tony Duells schematics).
Maybe someone can help?
Martin
So after replacing a microcode PROM on the PDP-11/05 control board and then
concluding that the remaining problem relating to indexed addressing was
caused by one single micro code line that got missing when typed in,
desoldering the PROM, program two more bits (0xf to 0x5), the CPU is now
working. Passing the D0OA diagnostics and the D0NB (except for the mov r0,
(r0)+ tests)
But during the journey the core memory died. I am used to things failing in
my face. The M9301 board started of working. Then it developed some kind of
amnesia, permanently forgetting what was once stored. When this was cured
with yet another PROM, one, then a second DEC8881 driver on the M9301-YF
gave up. But now it seems to work.
So finally I am back to the core memory. Luckily I had a spare set so I
could find at least what board that was failing. Card swapping gave that
the G231 module was at fault. The failure mode is that it does read out the
contents once. The second time it reads out all zeros. Write never works.
Apparently it is the write / write back mechanism that is failing
completely in the G231 module. Since it is in fact reading, the X / Y
selection seems to work and most of the writing takes place on the G110 as
far as I understand since it contains the Inhibit drivers. So what part of
the G231 is specific for the write?
I have a few other G110 / G231 modules with different types of failure
modes so it would be really nice if someone with MM11-L know-how would step
forward and share all the details on this board set.
I will continue to browse the schematic and the user manual to try to find
the failing component, but help is highly appreciated!
/Mattis
I picked up two crates jam packed full of floppys today. Bunch of random
old utilities in there, borland turbo asm, turbo pascal, windows for
workgroups etc.
I found a set of disks with the DEC digital logo on them. 4-5 disks, says
dos for the dec pc. Some utilitys too. Are these of any use to anyone, or
is it just a stock dos install with a dec sticker on the disk?
There are little heaps of disks on just about every surface around here, i
will post back with a complete list of what is here to see if anyone is
interested in what is here. I just want some of the software off of the
disks, i don't necessarily want to keep the two full crates of disks around
. There is also an original copy of doom on floppy that looks to be
complete.
--Devin
Hi Mark, it wasn't myself either.
Apologies (and to Brian, James and Jon) I was watching & wanting to respond
but got hit by a wall of things, then noticed that someone had bid on it.
Very glad to see it was acquired, and that Chris could confirm.
Hello, just came across this site. I recently got a Compucorp 122E, but
without any manual. I would like to use this calculator for tests in
programming - does anyone have a manual/pdf?
Thanks,
Matthias
ps.: this mail is for the "list" - how can I have access to the list?
How do I see a reply, in case there is one?
Tel.0049-6741-1720
http://m-draeger.com/
Matthias Draeger
Auf dem Haehnchen 32
56329 St. Goar/ Germany
> From: Corey Cohen
> It was not someone at the PCB manufacturer. They would not have had
> access to the prom software.
So, do you have a theory about where this came from? (There is absolutely zero
snark here, this is a serious question. It's quite a puzzle, and an
interesting one.)
Maybe a collaboration between two people, one at Apple, one at the PCB house?
'Make two extra boards, and I'll trade you the PROMs for one of them.' Can't
do it with just a person at the PCB house - as you point out, need the ROMs.
But you'd think that if someone at Apple just pulled a board, that would be
noticed (board count wrong).
Noel
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-22/vintage-computer-museum-revives-hp211…
A keen mountaineer who died trekking in Tibet has left a rare computer
collection behind as his legacy.
Surrounded by bushland in the eastern suburbs of Melbourne is a wooden shed
with barn doors.
It closely resembles a shed in California where, in 1939, Bill Hewlett and
Dave Packard launched the company that would become HP.
The much larger Australian shed is home to the HP Computer Museum, filled
with ageing computers, printers and calculators, most of which are a dull
light grey. ...
finaly got some pregress on this 8i from a feild restoration of mine..
now to sit down and do an order for the transistors
and go talk to the local ewaste recycler on monday see if they can help me
source some slider switches like one i found in the junk pile at the local
hacker space last night looks very promising will need to get new rocker
peics made to atach the 8i switches to but its looking promising if this
works out there may be a suden suply of replacement switch assemblys
avail...
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8752/27863539914_a92d0264c7_b.jpg
baby steps baby steps
Is there anyone with documents on the Nova 3 front panel, and what
drives it? It has some number of custom DG chips, which hopefully are
good if I want to try to fire it up to play, but am interested in that
on good authority there are 28v incandescent lamps.
A friend has an Eclipse front panel with nearly identical bezel, which
has LED's and a number of differences in the logic (different connector
to the system, for instance). So it is probably all run on 5v.
I have not had time to figure out the driver circuit for any of the
lamps to see what that may turn up, and wanted to know whether it was
28v lamps before I buy 40 of them. (the thing has only 2 out of a lot
of lamps).
Thanks
Jim
> From: Corey Cohen
> This board is from the 1st PCB house that made the "byte shop" boards
> but has the more expensive and reliable RN sockets.
Maybe someone at the 1st PCB house made an extra board for themselves, and
used better sockets (since it was for themselves)?
Noel
Hi Guys,
I've got an HP 9810A that has been stored in sub-optimal conditions by
a previous owner; a lot of the keyboard springs have rusted away, so
I'm looking for a replacement. These are about 15.5mm outer diameter,
0.35mm thick wire, about 10mm high when uncompressed, and have only
about 1.5 turns of wire.
Any pointers would be appreciated!
Camiel.
I am probably too stupid to not understand how to get into this box:
http://i.imgur.com/7KXKP2l.jpg
Before I break some parts of the old plastic I better ask...
What is the procedure to open this up?
The drive doesn't seem to work properly. Either I need to get it working
somehow or replace it with a new (512 byte block capable) drive.
/Mattis
>You used to be able to find a set with connector blocks for $200 to $300
>range on EBay. But I haven't seen any pop up for a couple of years now.
>
There are actually two individual board on eBay now, but the they are a
bit expensive, ~$250 each. The freight change is about $200 to Sweden for
each board (don't now if they combine chipping). I'll guess I have to pay
for customs as well...
>Keep an eye on machines. These options were found in the variants of E's
>(F and M) and some A's. You might have to buy another machine in order to
>get this option.
>
If I only could find one...
>Remember that you are looking for what I would classify as a fairly rare
>option on machines that are becoming rare now. There are not a lot of
>these machines in service anymore.
>
>Good Luck!
Thanks, I know that those things starts to get really rare. I could live
with a broken set.
/Anders
> From: Paul Koning
>> I always felt that RISC meant 'making the basic cycle time as fast as
>> possible by finding the longest path through the logic - i.e. the
>> limiting factor on the cycle time - and removing it (thereby making the
>> instruction set less rich); then repeat'.
> "Making the cycle time as fast as possible" certainly applies, in
> spades, to the 6600. The deeper you dig into its details, the more
> impressed you will be by the many different ways in which it does things
> faster than you would expect to be possible.
My formulation for RISC had two parts, though: not just minizing the cycle
time, but doing so by doing things that (as a side-effect) make the
instruction set less capable. I'm not very familiar with the 6600 - does this
part apply too?
>> RISC only makes (system-wide) sense in an environment in which memory
>> bandwidth is plentiful (so that having programs contain more, simpler
>> instructions make sense)
I should have pointed out that programs of that sort take not just more memory
bandwidth, but more memory to hold them. In this day of massive memories, no
biggie, but back in the core memory days, it was more of an issue.
>> One of the books about Turing argues that the ACE can be seen as a RISC
>> machine (it's not just that it's load-store; its overall architectural
>> philosophy is all about maximizing instruction rates).
I looked, and it's "Alan Turing's Automatic Computing Engine"; in Chapter 8,
"Computer architecture and the ACE computers", by Robert Doran (which is not,
for some reason, listed in the ToC).
> I think a lot of machine designers, though not all, were seriously
> interested in making them go fast.
Again, RISC has two legs, not just making the machine fast, but making them
fast by using techniques that, as a side-effect, make them inscrutable, and
difficult to program. The concept was that they would not, in general, be
programmed in assembler - precisely because they were so finicky.
Remember, the 801 was a combined hardware/compiler project, in which
complexity was moved from the hardware to the compiler; and early RISC
machines has things like no interlocks between pipeline stages. So they really
were not intended to be programmed in assembler - the compiler was critical.
The ACE, on the surface, didn't follow this, as it had no compiler. However,
at a higher level, Turing definitely followed the RISC philosophy of making
the machine as fast as possible, by using techniques that made it very hard to
program; instead of moving the complexity to the compiler, he moved it to the
programmer - the latter not being a problem, if you're Alan Turing! :-)
Noel
Hi All,
I noticed that the Multiflow race 14/300 system listed on eBay didn't sell
recently. I don't have any personal background with these machines but it
seems they could be both significant and rare? It's been sitting on eBay but
I wasn't sure if it had slipped between the cracks somehow? I've been in
contact with the seller and he's said that he's still hoping to sell it, but
that it has to be cleared soon (and would be scrapped). I don't live in the
US, so it's not an easy one for me to work with. Is this of interest to
anyone? Cheers Evan
http://www.ebay.com/itm/112050410557
I need to find a place to ask questions about scanners (scanner in the
sense of an Epson Perfection 1260 flatbed scanner, not in the sense of
radios).
Several searches have yielded only radio-type scanner sites (or dead links).
Does anyone here know of newsgroups or discussion boards for scanners?
Thanks,
Kurt
So I'm trying to work out how the PDP-11/24 memory works - in particular, how
the memory slots in the backplane can also support SPC devices.
Chapter 5 of the -11/24 Technical Manual does not help - irritatingly! It
spends a lot of time talking about the CPU's memory mapping (well documented
elsewhere), and little on these blasted busses!
Alas, there seems to be no KT-24 prints online (although the tech manual makes
reference to various pages in it); prints of the backplane would also be
really useful, but again, don't seem to be in what is online. Does anyone have
either one?
Failing that, I guess it will require getting ahold of a backplane, and seeing
what I can find out with an ohm-meter.
In general, I am not absolutely positive about how the UNIBUS and the Extended
UNIBUS manage to co-exist on the backplane (although I think I have worked it
out - see below). The tech manual acts as if the KT-24 acts as an intermediary
between the two... which is fine, except that how are the both carried on the
backplane, separately, but at the same time?
When there _is_ a KT-24 (the system can work without one - more below on
this), how is the EUB (which is just the UNIBUS plus a couple of extra address
lines) separated from the UB? The way the UNIBUS mapping registers work, the
EUB address for any given cycle can vary from the UB address by an arbitrary
amount, so lower address bits can't be shared between the two busses.
(Because address bit X might have to simultaneously be '0' for one bus, and
'1' for the other.) I.e. the two busses can't somehow mostly share the same
pins, through some kludge...
It appears likely that somehow the UNIBUS is on connectors C-F (i.e. where it
normally is on SPC slots), and the EUB is on the A-B connectors (as in MUD
slots) - and the two are not connected together.
(Note that on the 11/24 backplane, 4 slots are marked "SPC/Mem", and two
"SPC/MUD", which supports this theory; the 4 slots would have the EUB and the
UB not connected together - as they would be in a normal MUD/SPC slot.)
Looking at the CPU prints (which _are_ available), it appears to confirm this
theory; the 22-bit EUB address bus is carried on the MUD/EUB address lines
(connectors A/B), and the 18-bit UNIBUS addresses are carried on the SPC
address pins (connector E). Dollars to donuts those pins are carried across
slots 1-6, and not intereconnected vertically (I have yet to verify that,
either with the backplane prints, or with an ohm-meter, but I would put a very
large bet on it.)
Oddly enough, the CPU uses the UNIBUS SPC data pins (connector C), instead of
the MUD ones (connector A). The thing is that EUB memory boards (e.g. MM11-M -
the relevant page of the MS11-P prints are missing from the online set, alas)
pick up the MUD pins for data. So the backplane must connect together the SPC
data pins and the MUD data pins.
The system can apparently also work _without_ a KT-24! Which raises the
question 'how do DMA devices get to the memory when there's no KT-24'?
>From looking at the CPU prints, (pg. K11) it _looks_ like the UNIBUS is
automagically mapped through to the EUB when there's no KT24 (there's a pin
which is apparently pulled low by the KT-24); the low (256-8=248) KB of UNIBUS
address space is mapped straight across to low address space on the EUB memory
bus.
With no KT24 in, a standard EUB memory can go in 2. Slot 2 is special, though;
the KT24 needs not just the UNIBUS lines, and EUB address lines (to map from
one to the other); it also has some special interconnects with the CPU, e.g.
that 'UNIBUS adapter present' line.
Guess I should document all this in the Computer History Wiki, but those prints
(KT-24, and -11/24 backplane) would still be useful.
Noel
> From: Tony Duell
> If it's anything like the 11/44 ... the memory bus is carried on the A
> and B connectors, the peripheral bus on the C,D,E,F connectors.
I have yet to totally grok the -11/44, but the documentation indicates the
slots for memory are memory only (i.e. EUB on the A/B connectors). Are you
saying they are also SPC on the C/F connectors? (If so, ever tried plugging an
SPC device into a 'memory' slot? :-)
If so, that would make it very similar to the -11/24, then - although does it
also have the thing where the data lines are connected from the EUB (connector
A) to the SPC UNIBUS (connector C)? The CPU prints show data from the CPU
going to connector A, unlike the -11/24, which sends data to C - although if
the backplane has the EUB and SPC data busses connected, it would all be the
same in the end.
Noel
So the online set of MS11-P Field Maintainence prints is missing page 3 of the
prints (data drivers page). Does anyone have an original hard-copy, and can
supply a scan of the missing page? Thanks (in advance, and hopefully :-).
Noel
*Accuracy takes power: one man?s 3GHz quest to build a perfect SNES
emulator*
*Emulators for playing older games are immensely popular online, with
regular arguments breaking out over which emulator is best for which game.
Today we present another point of view from a gentleman who has created the
Super Nintendo emulator **bsnes**. He wants to share his thoughts on the
most important part of the emulation experience: accuracy.*
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2011/08/accuracy-takes-power-one-mans-3ghz-qu…
--
Sent from my phone - please pardon brevity & typos.
I have a few GRiD compass systems and some are suffering from massively
decreased contrast on the edges of the displays:
[See the system on the left]
https://www.instagram.com/p/BIGGzUzgat-/?taken-by=tr1nitr0n
[Or this one:]
http://www.ripstick.com/USCM/images/Grid_Compass_1101_Laptop_in_Box_002.jpg
Meanwhile, other EL systems I have- like my HP integral PC- haven't
succumbed to this.
I have seen similar issues on amLCD displays in my Tadpole, Toshiba and
other machines, so this is something we all may have to confront.
-------
I was wondering if the folks here had theories?
I'm thinking moisture (or air) might be leaking in from the edges of the
glass panes, perhaps from a compromised seal- sorry for the silly picture
but you can see the composition of the display here:
https://www.instagram.com/p/6BXaLBtSzd/?taken-by=tr1nitr0n
Does anyone know how one might prevent this from progressing- storage tips?
Could it be reversed?
Better yet, does anyone have ideas on how to rapidly dehydrate the display?
Perhaps there is even a way to re-seal them.
I think all two-glass-pane displays that don't have a vacuum may eventually
succumb to this.
Perhaps it is just oxidation and not moisture, but I'd love to hear any
theories.
Thanks,
- Ian
--
Ian Finder
(206) 395-MIPS
ian.finder at gmail.com
Hello everyone. My employer plans to close the data center where I have
been working for several years usually. This involves the destruction or
elimination of all kinds of manuals, books, documents and diverse equipment
considering that this is deprecated. In general the hardware belongs to IBM
for contractual reasons, but not so with the documentation I have mentioned.
In my case I saved from destruction several old manuals and training
courses that I will begin to scan in the coming months. But I can not take
care of all available material. As an example there are enough red books
related IBM OS / 2 and its environment. There are also several CICS 2.1 ...
it is difficult to make an accurate count. I will try to make some more
detailed photos as possible and post them somewhere so that anyone
interested can review. Given my residence in the European Union, I think it
would be easier to send these documents to interested persons who also
reside in the EU, if necessary.
On the other hand I must say that we store yet one IBM 3705 operative until
few years ago. I don't know what plans have IBM for it. But that's another
story.
With kind regards
Sergio
A very nice IBM 3480 brochure ended up in my hands yesterday and I had
to bump it to the top of the scan queue:
https://archive.org/details/IBM3480MagneticTapeSubsystemBrochure
Lots of nice shots of IBM data center tape equipment as well as a cool
"history of tape at IBM" set of pages. I've never heard of 7340
Hypertape.
-j
> From: Mouse
> I'm wondering how practical it might be to take a laser and turn it
> into a vector display on a handy blank wall
Those have been around for decades - I recall seeing them used to draw things
on the sides of building, _many_ moons ago. I'm assuming they bounce the beam
off a mirror, and actuate the mirror, but I don't actually know how they
worked.
Noel
I recently got access to an orginal PDP-11/70 front console (the one in
magenta and rose), and also an 'Industrial' -11/70 (blue and red). Scans of
both of these front panels have been added to my PDP-11 stuff page:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/PDP-11_Stuff.html
My A3 scanner won't _quite_ eat the whole thing in one gulp, but it did manage
to 'see' all the printed stuff. The actual panel is very slightly larger, so
there are some thin sections on either side missing from the scan, _but_ on
that page there is a mechanical drawing that gives the dimensions of the whole
thing. So the two together should enable a complete reproduction.
Noel
I wonder if any of the other digi labs leads are comparable? We have
fabratek and a few other brands. We got a bit obsessed with trainer type
gear for electronics and physics 'this what that got young people
interested back when' display.
if there are any list member with a small turret lathe that would be
nice to make pins with. pretty labor intensive. Better would be small
Brown and Sharpe screw machine would make buckets of them once you got
the machine all set up to make the run. Or cnc machine ( I never ran
one of those) --- or as mentioned casting some.
I will look and see is we need any pins.
Ed#.
In a message dated 7/19/2016 11:30:10 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
v.slyngstad at frontier.com writes:
From: Karl-Wilhelm Wacker: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 5:21 PM
> This company does custom tapered pins in brass -
> There are others out there I'm sure.
>
> I would find out what their minimum is and get a bulk order together.
>
> http://www.stanlok.com/Taper_Pin_Pages/an386.html
>
> A place I worked for in the past had www.mill-max.com do a custon part
for
> them,
> in the 100's - I would talk to them about a part also.
>From what I can gather from the websites you referred me to,
the tapered part of the pin's dimensions are very close to the woner if
fabratecnarrow end of a standard taper #4/0 in the 3/4" length? Have
I done the math right on that?
>From there it would seem to be a matter of getting a way to
mount the wire, and optionally to shorten the overall length
of the pin and wire attachment to .65" from .75". (Or maybe
just slot the pin's fat end, solder in the wire, and call it good.)
I also thought about using a taper reamer to create molds and
perhaps casting with solder around the fluxed wire. (Casting
brass or bronze seemed to require more heat than I could
generate easily.)
(For some reason that I've forgotten over the years, my eBay
search for suitable pins looks for "42107" and "42279". Never
gotten any results for it, though.)
Vince
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:01 AM, <COURYHOUSE at aol.com> wrote:
> also a Rare Digital DEC H-500 Computer Lab, 1960s, Same Switches as
> PDP-8/I, Vintage for 700+
>
> ( we have an extra one of these Computer Lab, if anyone here is
> interested)
Does anyone have a modern source of pins that fit the socket holes in
the Computer Lab? ISTR there are a few of us here who have an H-500,
but very few, or no, patch cables. I think Molex pins have been tried
and rejected.
Also, the 1969 Computer Lab Handbook is on bitsavers (in
'dec/handbooks'). I recall a 8.5"x11" book on the Computer Lab, newer
layout, probably a 1970s publication date, possibly a teacher's guide.
I was given one as a kid, but it vanished decades ago. Anyone
remember this? Anyone have one for scanning?
-ethan
http://m.ebay.com/itm/DEC-PDP8-I-MINICOMPUTER-PDP8-PDP-8-PDP-8-/201627112300
Did someone already post this other pdp-8 auction? Same semi-ridiculous starting price as other straight 8 but i honestly don't know enough about PDP to know what this is or if its not a straight version. ?Seems like a museum piece though although perhaps all of you PDP collectors have a similar setup :-)?
> From: Mouse
> my impression is that they're only for pre-prepared displays, and only
> some displays (notably those that don't involve the beam turning any
> sharp corners
My vague recollection is that they could do pretty sharp corners, but it's
been decades. IIRC, they were multi-coloured.
> Turning sharp corners is the hard part with mechanical deflectors like
> mirrors, as it means very high acceleration of the mechanical parts.
Probably the trick is to do what old voice-coil actuator drives did for
multi-track seeks, which was to evenly accelerate up to maximum velocity,
coast at that until you got close to the target track, and then evenly ramp
down, so that the head assembly's radial velocity goes to 0 as you get to the
target track. (If you're not moving enough tracks to do the whole thing, you
only ramp up part-way, then ramp back down.) The RK05 drive did this with
fancy analog circuits, but these days one would do it in software.
I would assume one would do something similar with the mirror; evenly
accelerate up to maximum slew rate, then back down at the end of the move, so
that when one gets to the corner, the mirror is mostly stationary, and so not
so much force is needed to sharply change directions. Of course, this might
make the parts of the line where the mirror is moving slower brighter, but
perhaps one could tweak the brightness to compensate.
Noel
A reseller in GA is dumping some online inventory that they used to sell on
ebay. Included are
23 SEAGATE ST32500N HARD DRIVE
If interested, email to Mike Roetzer [mike at tbfcomputing.com]
Not affiliated with the seller at all.
Cindy Croxton
I just put in pdp-8 in ebay search and saw it last nite -Ed#
In a message dated 7/19/2016 12:24:15 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
pontus at Update.UU.SE writes:
I can't find it, does anyone have a URL?
/P
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 01:58:12PM -0700, jim stephens wrote:
> 25,000, Alexandria, Va.
>
> Josh Dersch can have one for his home and for work.
>
> BTW, about the other nice system noted here, I was hoping the 11/20
would
> stay off the radar and not go for a zillion bucks, so much for that idea.
> At least I have the means to go to Tucson and get it if I'm nuts and go
for
> it.
>
> Thanks
> Jim
25,000, Alexandria, Va.
Josh Dersch can have one for his home and for work.
BTW, about the other nice system noted here, I was hoping the 11/20
would stay off the radar and not go for a zillion bucks, so much for
that idea. At least I have the means to go to Tucson and get it if I'm
nuts and go for it.
Thanks
Jim
A rescue available... contact Ric directly below.
- John
>From: Ric Chitwood <dancetech at comcast.net>
>Subject: Atari 1040ST
>Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:56:05 -0600
>
>I have a fully functioning Atari 1040ST with monitor in the original boxes that I would like to donate.
>It also has the Hybrid Arts Smpte Track hardware and software included.
>
>I also have a fully functioning Apple 7100AV computer with monitor and Digidesign sound card and software floppy discs. Are you interested in these computers or do you know of someone who is?
>
>Ric Chitwood
>Pleasant Grove, Utah
In the UK we have, for DOMESTIC premises something call "Part P"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Mouse
> Sent: 19 July 2016 17:47
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Cray J932SE (was Re: Straight 8 up on Ebay just now)
>
> >> [...electrical wiring...]
> > This very definitely is an area where, if you're not 100% comfortable
> > with t$
>
> Also, know your own limits. A depressing number of people think they're
> more competent than they are.
>
> For example, I once had a neighbour who replaced an outlet in his kitchen.
> Turned off the breaker, removed the old one, put in the new one, all very
> nice. Turned the breaker for that circuit back on and popped the service
> main breaker.
>
In the UK we used to have an inspection regime. You did the work, they would
inspect.
These days, for DOMESTIC premises we have something call "Part P" which
limits what a householder can and cannot do.
So you can generally do "like for like" replacements, add additional outlets
where permitted and one or two other things.
Originally all work in Kitchens was defined as "Special" and was notifiable,
but this was modified so that is no longer the case.
So as the above is a "like for like" replacement, I believe it is currently
permitted in the UK.
Of course in a Museum, or even a Scout Hut, provided it does not share a
supply with residential premises then any one can do the
Work so long as it is later inspected.....
... the problem with Part P is that it encourages a "tick box" approach and
the Electrician who replaced my "Consumer Unit" (distribution panel)
With a new one with multiple RCD's which tripped suggested it would be
simpler to re-wire rather than fix the existing wiring.
This sort of approach seems common. The actual fault was that I have a pair
of linked smoke detectors, and one was connected via one RCD, the other via
a different RCD.
The connection between the two was sufficient to cause an imbalance. I
replaced them with wireless linked smoke detectors and all works well....
> When I investigated, it turned out the new outlet still had the bridging
piece
> that shorts together the hots for the two outlets, and this was a kitchen
> outlet and thus had separate circuits for each half (and, as is often the
case,
> they were on adjacent fingers in the breaker box and thus on different
> phases). So, of course, the new outlet shorted the two hot phases
together.
>
> He didn't have the experience to recognize that those shorting pieces
exist,
> to realize that having four conductors instead of three coming to the
outlet -
> or its being a kitchen outlet - likely means the two halves are on
different
> circuits and thus likely different phases, or the electrical understanding
to put
> those facts together. Which wouldn't've been a problem, except that he
> thought he was fine - he didn't bring me in until the main service breaker
> blew. (He did, fortunately, have enough sense for that to tickle his
> "something I don't understand happened, call for help" reaction.)
>
> I've been doing electrical work since I was maybe ten or twelve, when I
> helped my parents wire the house they were building. (My father inspected
> my work first; then, this being de rigeur there-and-then, it was inspected
by
> a suitable authority. Only then was it energized.) I don't hesitate to
do
> routine house electrical work, maybe even installing 30A outlets (though
I'd
> make sure I looked up the appropriate gauge of wire, and probably then
> used the next larger gauge). But I'd call in someone more experienced for
> something well outside my own experience, like (say) dealing with 600/600
> service.
>
> I would say that, if you don't have a good deal of experience, find
someone
> who does to look over your work before you energize it.
> Indeed, some jurisdictions require that for work done by unlicensed
persons
> - or at least used to, and I would assume some still do. Even if yours
doesn't,
> it strikes me as the smart thing to do.
>
> /~\ The ASCII Mouse
> \ / Ribbon Campaign
> X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
> / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Dave
G4UGM
> From: Paul Koning
> The article, as usual, talks about a whole bunch of things that are
> much older than the author seems to know.
"The two most common things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." OK,
so technically it's ignorance, not stupidity, but in my book it's stupid to
not know when one's ignorant.
> RISC, as a term, may come from IBM, but the concept goes back at least
> as far as the CDC 6000 series.
Hmm; perhaps. I always felt that RISC meant 'making the basic cycle time as
fast as possible by finding the longest path through the logic - i.e. the
limiting factor on the cycle time - and removing it (thereby making the
instruction set less rich); then repeat'. (And there's also an aspect of
moving complexity from the hardware to the compiler - i.e. optimizing system
performance across the _entire_ system, not just across a limited subset like
the hardware only).
As I've previously discussed, RISC only makes (system-wide) sense in an
environment in which memory bandwidth is plentiful (so that having programs
contain more, simpler instructions make sense) - does that apply to the CDC
machines?
> Pipelining, to the CDC 7600.
Didn't STRETCH have pipelining? Too busy/lazy to check...
> And if you equate RISC to load/store with simple regular instruction
> patterns, you can probably go all the way back to the earliest
> computers
Well, I'm not at all sure that load-store is a good indicator for RISC - note
that that the PDP-10 is load-store... But anyway, moving on.
One of the books about Turing argues that the ACE can be seen as a RISC
machine (it's not just that it's load-store; its overall architectural
philosophy is all about maximizing instruction rates).
Noel