From: Jerome Fine <jhfine(a)idirect.com>
>Actually, since I am not a VAX/VMS person, I was thinking more along
>the lines of a PDP-11 and RT-11. But since I know that a Qbus host
>adapter such as a CMD 220/M (CMD) and a SQ706A (Dialog) both
>function for either PDP-11 CPUs or uVAX II CPUs on any OS which
>uses the MSCP interface, I guess that I am too out of touch with the
>problems of what an IDE Qbus controller might have difficulty with.
The key is MSCP is not a trivial protocal and the underlying hardware
to do that requires muscle in the form of a fast cpu.
IDE is fairly stupid and easy to interface as PIO, DMA would not be that
bad for vax or PDP11 but you would pay for it by needing drivers as
there are none.
>And in particular, I was sort of referring to using an IDE Qbus
controller
>with John Wilson's adaptation of the Russian HD(X).SYS that he has
>so conveniently made available in E11. There has been some discussion
>about producing an IDE/SCSI version of a Qbus controller which would
>be able to be a REAL Qbus PDP-11 controller with an RT-11 software
>device driver identical in code to the HD(X).SYS used with the E11
I think I was part of that discussion too.
RT-11 and the overlay TSX-11 are easy compared to something like VMS.
Unix sources permitting would be doable.
>Anyone out there who wants to try? I would be very pleased to
>swap some of my time for a couple of SCSI 32 GByte hard drives
>to test out the software. The only problem is that the only SCSI
>host adapters I have are the 50 pin type (CQD 220/M), so there
I've run my PDP11 with SCSI CQD already as it's MSCP, Same
for VAX/VMS (it's in my MVII).
It's limited to 4 or 8gb and SCSI-II so forget the reall monster drives.
>might be a problem if there are no drives larger than 8 Gbytes which
>have the old SCSI-2 50 pin interface. On the other hand, if
Its pretty easy to fine drives inthe 2-9gb range still and they are
cheap.
The idea of such huge drive with RT11 and friends is that is wasted.
I use D540s (31mb) and swap them like carts as I have a bunch of em
and they are plenty big enough. Drives in the 120-400MB range are
plentyful for me, one 200mb drive would take all the binaries and
sources I have with room to spare that aren't already on Tims CD.
Whats the point?
The value of IDE on Qbus is cheap easy to find drives in the sub
(at the time) 1gb class.
Allison
Hi Paul,
This isn't an allocation class issue. Its something I brought on myself,
and for that am paying the price :-). My true question is whether or not
I'm going to be stuck re-installing VMS, however given the way VMS works
I'm sure there is some voodoo to fix it.
I got in this mess as follows:
I installed an RF72 drive into my 4000/200 and proceeded to do a 'sho dev'
on it. It showed up on the DSSI bus as $24$DIA264:
I then installed VMS 7.2 on to this drive, followed by a bunch of layered
products.
Then I read in the KA660 technical manual how to "talk" to the DSSI drives,
(which is very arcane using the KFQSA but a snap on the KA640 and KA660)
and proceeded to tell the drive to call itself node SYSTEM and unit 0.
This worked fine, and I noted that I could now boot the system by
specifying DIA0: rather than DIA264: (which I never could remember anyway).
Then I went to install another layered product. That installation failed
because it couldn't find a file is was expecting in
SYS$SYSDEVICE:[SY0.SYSTEMP] (or something very similar). So I did a dir
SYS$SYSDEVICE: and sure enough there was nothing there, then I did a SHOW
LOGICALS and from there discovered that SYS$SYSDEVICE: was defined to be
$24$DIA264: (the original name of the DSSI drive)
Now I could name it back again. But I'd rather tell VMS where the SYSDEVICE
now sits (for all the system, like on a permanent basis). If I 'define' it,
it changes for the current process but doesn't change universally and more
importantly other things are stuck that way to.
Nothing is SYSTARTUP_VMS.COM defines these so they must be in a parameter
database somewhere else. That is where I'm looking now ...
On a somewhat related note, I went out and forked over $100 for a true 5
port switch so that I can put my VLC cluster on a switch! Now all I need is
a console multiplexor.
--Chuck
At 08:35 PM 10/2/00 -0500, you wrote:
>The system$dia0 isn't especially newer or better. It is the name of the
>disk with the allocation class set to 0. Check your drive firmware to
>make sure that the alloclass on that disk didn't get changed to 24 wen you
>changed the node name.
>
>There is also a MSCP_ALLOCLASS parameter in SYSGEN but that is less likely
>to be the culprit.
>
>The allocation class is a mechanism to prevent like-named devices (i.e.
>machines on a CI or DSSI each with a DxAxxx device) from confusing one
>another.
>
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Chuck McManis wrote:
>
> > I know, I should ask info-vax. But I'm not subscribed there :-(
> >
> > I changed the nodename on my DSSI drive (looks like an HSC50 to the VAX)
> > and it still boots VMS but SYS$SYSDEVICE is set to $24$DIA264 not the
> > newer, more friendly SYSTEM$DIA0: I tried doing an autogen but that didn't
> > seem to change anything :-). Clues?
> >
> > --Chuck
> >
>
> We still have about 4 of these 310's in operation here which we are in the
> process of retiring. But, unlike Pats, ours run the iRMX OS. There wasan
active
> user group for these (iRUG ?) but don't know if its still a functioning
> group.
Always wanted an iRMX-based system...
Do these 310s have their retirement mapped out already?
regards,
-dq
From: Claude <claudew(a)sprint.ca>
>I have yet to find anybody to trade or talk collecting face-to-face
>anywhere around here even if I have posted on several montreal
>newsgroups that I am looking to buy/trade this kinda stuff...
I find that rather unusual. In the 80s I used to call on companies
in Montreal and there were a lot of them in the small computer
market. More than likely there are other collectors and your
entering late on the scene.
Computers are tough to find here (not like california...) I have managed
>to accumulate/fix/restore approx 50 micros (all working) from the
>197x-198x early 1990's...lotta books, software and peripherals...
1980x oh you mean recent stuff. ;) I have a handful of machines
I really like to use from the 70's. Just got some core for my PDP-8/F
that should be old enough.
>Those who feel sad for me can send me their Lisa's, TRS model IIIs and
>Next boxes ;->
No intrest in those.
Allison
From: Claude <claudew(a)sprint.ca>
>These are the 1st floppy disks for the COCO made by RS. The units are
>TEC FB-201.
>
>Large full size mounted on their side in silver case with power supply.
>
>When dskinit (format) command issued, they go about 35 tracks then an
>error is reported on the COCO screen.
You sure it isn't the first drives for the TRS-80? The symptom would be
the older SA400 drives designed for 35 track operation used within.
The later drives were SA400Ls that were designed for 40 track operation.
Both used the spiral groove cam but one was a bit different.
Open up the box and see which you have.
The other possibility is old (really old) media ment for the 35 track
drives and this media has a smaller "window" in the jacket that will
limit head travel.
>They can't read a disk formatted on a good drive.
That suggests teh head follower is out of the groove or
the stepper has been rotated or other wear probems.
>These drives use a plastic disc with a "spiral" grove stuck to the
>stepper motor shaft to step the head along. I have seen this in Apple II
>drives, it seemed reliable...but I have been told these RS drives were
>not really realiable...
SA400 drives were very poor over time for reliability. You would
need an alignment disk to set it up or lot of trial and error assuming
the head moves freely on it guide rails.
Allison
>> nothing in it) and a set of three posts one dip above it. If you
>> could tell me what you have there it would help.
>
>Will do. The 8/e is on my desk at work, so I'll email the info on
monday,
>if I forget, then remind me.
Thanks. I plan to power it up as is along to see where it sits. I was
told it was likely good but untested. Certainly looks good though
it has been repaired at one time.
Allison
Has anyone else noticed that last night Ebay changed the way they display
bids to include _all_ bids, even repeats by the same person. Interesting
bit of information that is. And to bring it on topic, there is a VAX
4000/VLC* (nothing special) that is up to $170! That's pretty amazing, and
to think I sold one at the VCF for $40 :-)
--Chuck
* Ebay item #461408005
From: Neil Cherry <ncherry(a)home.net>
>I blame Microsoft. :-)
Only partly. the public that buys this as the "best" is part fo the
problem.
For example, I do run a P166 w/64mb and NT4workstation and love it
but the only MS apps are IE4.01/sp2 and outlook express. Everything else
is NON MS, makes the system fast and solid. When I find a good
replacement for OutlookExpress that will with IE go to the trashbin.
In the end I had to do a very careful install to leave out junk. I'm
finding
Linux is going that way to. Why?? People want it!
>mail program part of the Browser? The recent Mozilla release (18) looks
>wonderful but cause Linux to swap like mad on a 64M box. I like Linux
That is disgusting.
>would not believe how idle a 386SX/16MHz is running all my HA software
>and a few other things).
I have two 286 boxen at work controlling ovens and testing parts.
My 386/16s I use one is a digital logic analyser (has a board in it)
and te other is a GP use box that is about the size of a small brick
with VGA or MDA(RS170 output). The latter runs fairly nice off the
kluge LVSMPS I created so it can use a 12V battery.
Try NewDeal Software on DOS with a 386/16, windows GUI and
all plus fast to boot and fits in some 10mb. They even have a
decent browser and email.
>We've thrown away being efficient for time to market and now we're
starting
Yep, it's the visual++ languages and all. I ran into someone that wanted
Visual C++ for 8051... get real!
>to see the environmental effect. Can anyone really see the need for a
233MHz
>sprinkler controller?
Also The PC based controls market still sells 486 based PC104, it's
plenty
enough.
Allison
This one is truly in the "For what it's worth" department.
Following the recent flamewar between Mr. Ismail and R.D. Davis, I
forwarded a (supposedly private) note with my concerns about it to the DNS
provider for the domain siconic.com (psyber.com). I did this because many
ISP's have explicit prohibitions in their terms of service against exactly
the kind of crap that was going down.
Apparently, the tech person for psyber and Mr. Ismail are on pretty good
terms. I got the attached blurb this evening.
If anyone on the list had any doubts as to what appears to be Mr. Ismail's
true nature, I suspect they will now be removed.
Yes, I've filter-filed the entire 'siconic.com' domain out of my system.
I'm completely fed up with the temper tantrums of its owner.
Attachment follows. In the interests of keeping the list on-topic, there
will be no further posts from me on this subject.
-=-=- <snip> -=-=-
>Delivered-To: kyrrin(a)mail-sttl.uswest.net
>Delivered-To: alias-bluefeathertech.com-kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
>Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 22:49:04 -0700
>From: "Sellam Ismail" <dastar(a)siconic.com>
>To: "Bruce Lane" <kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com>
>Subject: Re: Terms of Service query
>Reply-to: dastar(a)siconic.com
>Priority: normal
>X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
>
>Bruce,
>
>You, too, are an ass.
>
>Mind your own business and leave my ex-ISP folks alone. They have
>better things to worry about other than your inane and childish whining.
>
>On 11 Oct 2000, at 22:53, Bruce Lane wrote:
>
>> Hi, Ted,
>>
>> The owner of a domain you host (siconic.com/Sellam Ismail) has, in the
>> past 24 or so hours, been getting very abusive in both language and tone to
>> one of the users of a mailing list I'm a member of. The only thing the
>> other user did was to venture an opinion which Mr. Ismail apparently (and
>> violently) disagreed with.
>>
>> The other listmember, one R.D. Davis, has been utterly polite, and calm of
>> tone, despite suggestions by Mr. Ismail to, among other things "shut the
>> fuck up." I saw absolutely no reason why Mr. Davis's opinion should warrant
>> such a violent temper tantrum on Mr. Ismail's part.
>>
>> Now, being an experienced SysAdmin and domain owner myself, I would
>> ordninarily ignore this little bit of childish ranting and move on.
>> However, Mr. Ismail has not been particularly polite to me on other
>> occasions, so I'm beginning to wonder if this is a pattern with him:
>> Specifically, insulting the crap out of anyone that disagrees with him.
>>
>> My question: Many ISPs have, in their Terms of Service, prohibitions
>> against violent flaming. Is psyber.com one of them? If so, would you like
>> me to send you copies of the mailing list postings in question? Perhaps so
>> you can have some basis to remind Mr. Ismail that he's not the only one on
>> the Internet? ;-)
>>
>> If not, just say so and I'll let it go. Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
>> http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
>> Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
>> "I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
>> superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
>
>
>
>Sellam International Man of Intrigue and
Danger
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>Looking for a six in a pile of nines...
>
> Coming soon: VCF 4.0!
> VCF East: Planning in Progress
> See http://www.vintage.org for details!
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
Someone is offering me an IBM Series/1 minicomputer with all manuals, an
8" diskette drive, and a CDC Hard disk, for $100 plus shipping. Shipping
for the processor will be about $25, and between $50 and $75 for the
diskette drive. Shipping for the hard disk will be hundreds, so I won't
be getting it. I have three questions:
1. What can y'all tell me about everything? I know almost nothing about
it.
2. Is it worth getting the processor, manuals, and diskette drive,? It
comes with some disks, but I don't know what's on them.
3. Does anyone have an operating system for it?
Thanks,
Owen
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
> That should be EASY to do by using the ROM monitor. You shouldn't
even
>need OS software to do it. The monitor command R0 reads from the paper
tape
>port. I imagine that you could use another device to input data there
>instead of the PT reader. You could then use the monitor commands to
write
I did it that way for my first V2.2 port, used punch out to push it into
my box.
The "catch" code was 30 or so bytes. The source system was MDS-230.
The box I'd used for target was a Multibus design using a set of cards
I still have and a BLC80/10 with the memory map modded.
Allison
>One of the more interesting aspects of this bus is that every "target"
is
>an independent entity (its more like an 8 bit parallel network than an
I/O
>bus). Thus disks have their own controller running their own OS etc and
you
IE smaller version of the HSC and friends with potential for faster bus
as well.
>All in all I think it is superior to SCSI in many ways but because DEC
held
>on to it so tightly it was never adopted beyond DEC machines.
>
>As for the abbreviation DSSI I've heard two different expansions used:
> "Digital Standard Storage Interconnect"
> "Digital Standard System Interconnect"
>I've yet to find something that pins it down definitively.
DIGITAL Storage System Interconnect, The only use of "standard"
within the DEC lexicon is limited to "DEC Standards" refering to
the 200+ documented engineering standard for things like how to
pack and label a box, what a terminal is and must do to what a
VAX is and how it should work.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
>> I was hoping that I could get some useful OS running, CPM would be
great; I
>> have several CPM machines already, so it's not totally foreign to me.
Would
>> I need a different CPU card, or other hardware to run CP/M? For that
The bios would have to know how to handle the disk as it does single
denisty
and a M^2FM double density that is unique to Intel boxen. The single
density
mode will however run standard CPM (BIOS is in the alteration guide) and
usually on standard distrubtion 8" SSSD.
>code should work on your machine, as I recall. The main issue
>is that you'll most likely have to transfer things through a
>serial port to the MDS. It's a pain but it can be done.
You can use ISIS to help or hand push it some of it.
Allison
DEC's proprietary DSSI interface: Can anyone give me some idea of why DEC
came up with it, what benefits it offered over, say, SCSI, and whether it
was entirely proprietary or related to something like IPI?
For that matter, what the heck did DSSI abbreviate? My guess: Distributed
Storage Subsystem Interface.
Web sites, FAQs, or commentary are all welcome as this is pure curiousity
on my part. Thanks much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
I just got a DATARAM DR118A core (16kx12) for Omnibus
PDP-8s and one thing I really need to know. How or where
is the jumpers for the addressing?
Allison
From: Jerome Fine <jhfine(a)idirect.com>
>I doubt very much that the answer is YES! Otherwise, it would have been
>easy to produce the 3rd party SCSI host adapters and there would have
>been a lot more competition - even with the $ US 100 license fee.
the key is not to design a VMS driver so MSCP makes you immune to that.
If your willing then a bare SCSI interface is very doable, but the driver
will
be harder and slower even with DMA. In VAX products there was
competition
around storage perfomance even back then.
>Now I have heard of someone attempting to produce a Qbus controller
>for an IDE drive that would not even be MSCP - and probably put the
>IDE drive right on the controller - not that MSCP would be all that
There is a design out there, crude and PIO only. It would certainly work
as IDE can PIO pretty fast. the only thing that makes Q-bus the least
bit
hard is that it has a read before write, that can mess up some register o
riented devices with an out of sequence read.
Allison
From: Bruce Lane <kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com>
> DEC's proprietary DSSI interface: Can anyone give me some idea of why
DEC
>came up with it, what benefits it offered over, say, SCSI, and whether
it
>was entirely proprietary or related to something like IPI?
At the time it was developed SCSI was maybe SCSI-1 or II and way short on
perfomance, limited in number of possible connected devices and short on
cable length. DSSI like many of the DEC storage interconnect was trying
to
address problems like cable length (wanted longer), rate of
transmission(faster)
and cluster interconnect. It's also a protocal and within that it
addresses
best ways to move data faster and route it.
> For that matter, what the heck did DSSI abbreviate? My guess:
Distributed
>Storage Subsystem Interface.
Yes.
Allison
Still looking for a real 68000 Mac to play ZeroGravity on (68010 would
probably work too but let's stick to what I know :-) Anyone getting rid
of a Mac Plus or original Mac Classic, or maybe even a 128K Mac? ;-)
Seriously, please reply off-list if you have one you're willing to sell.
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- A good pun is its own reword. ----------------------------------------------
I, too, have one of these kicking around. Mine has a bad Ball Monitor inside.
I believe the MDS 225 is the Development System III mentioned in Joe's
documents in an earlier post. I used to play with these about 9 years ago
when we bought truckloads from Intel.
If you have questions contact me off list. Most info has been covered on the
other posts.
I think it is worth collecting. There are not many in the hands of hobbyists
and collectors. I used to have CPM for this system but I am not sure I still
do. If I find it I will let the list know.
I bet InBus Engineering still has cards and parts for these systems, if not
docs and SW. I know I sold them thousands of dollars worth of parts,
especially for the 310 systems many years ago. I still have some 310 multibus
systems & parts.
Their contact info is :
compumart(a)inbus.com
925-454-2561 voice
925-454-2501 fax
InBus Engineering,
6233 Industrial Way
Livermore, CA 94550
Unfortunately they realize they have almost the sole supply for these old
systems and their prices used to reflect that. I haven't talked with them in
years but they still advertise in Compu-Mart and the Processor.
Paxton
Portland, OR
Hi,
This may be off topic but I just have to brag
I just received my cobalt cube today whoo hoo.
Its is not 10 years old yet but has just been made obsolete by SUN who
bought Cobalt a couple of weeks ago.
It's brand new never openned in the original box.
I just can't wait to setup my server. But I have to for now though.
That's it
Thank you for reading, you may return to your normal occupation now.
Francois
Please reply to the original sender.
Reply-To: CDyson(a)jones-blythe.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:23:02 -0500
From: Carol Dyson <CDyson(a)jones-blythe.com>
Subject: IBM System 34
We are going to dispose of several terminals as well as System 34 - we also
have books from the initial installation, the system itself, plus CMAS
software. Would someone in the Illinois area be interested? I am merely
investigating this possibility as a way of not adding to our landfill and
not destroying something that a collector might be interested in. The
System 34 is still installed and not quit ready for disposal, but terminals
are. Is this old enough to be of interest?
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
From: Neil Cherry <ncherry(a)home.net>
>BTW is it easy to design boards for the Microvax. This Analog board
seems
>really simple. Designing an intelligent SCSI board wouldn't be a lot
more
>difficult (I didn't say anything about the Vax driver).
MVII is a Q-bus machine and like it's compatable Q-bus PDP-11s that
went before and during its a reasonably easy bus to interface to and
DEC did a fair job of makeing the documentation for it easy to get.
Designing a PIO SCSI card would be easy, DMA a bit harder but
there is no secrets there either. Programming is another thing though
as the Q-bus is an annex of the processor address space and DMA
between memory (on private(PMI) bus) and QBUS devices is more
complex programming. However RQDX (disks), DEQNA/DELQA (NIC)
do the dma trick so that is already known.
Allison
110VAC in Automobile
About 6 years I found that Radio Shack has a plug in the cigarette lighter
converter to 110v. We were able to power a small color TV and Toshiba VCR
for a 4000 mile in 3 weeks vacation with 3 small kids. The converter is
fused and sells for about $60. The van was also dragging a small 2 wheel
trailer. You could feel the engine labor sometimes in the mountains. I
took ear plugs, disney movie music rots your brain. My wife still uses the
converter to recharge her cell phone in the car.
Now parent of 3 partially grown kids, two in high school.
Mike
mmcfadden(a)cmh.edu
I realize this falls into the category of stupid
questions, but:
The RL02 has to be plugged into a *live* RLV12
before it will spin-up, right?
Jeff
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>Let's see, how would you name a meeting where several buyers went
>home with new toys at acceptable prices (a TRS 80 M1 with expansion
>box, printer and all dust covers (!) at USD 30 isn't realy overpriced)
>and some pricepushing dealer went home with their entire stock ?
>
I just Wish I could have seen his face when he was packing his stuff back.
I hope he swore to never make it back.
Francois
In a message dated 10/13/00 2:25:24 AM Eastern Daylight Time, foo(a)siconic.com
writes:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, John Foust wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'm in a throw-away mood as opposed to a
> > collection mood. I tossed 3" x 3" x 25" of old clone
> > 8088 through 486 PCs and cases away last Tuesday.
> >
> > I coalesced a box of Pentium 50-166 Mhz era motherboards,
> > some brand-new, and for heaven's sake, they would barely
> > fetch a few bucks on eBay. My other mantra was a friend's
> > rule that if you can't sell it on eBay, throw it out.
>
> ACK!
>
> As much as I hate having seemingly useless crap like this, I still refuse
> to throw it out. It's useful to SOMEONE.
>
> What I'm recommending to people who have older PCs these days is to donate
> them to your local community college electronics or engineering
> departments. I'm sure the students can use them for either spare parts or
> as controllers for whatever projects they're working on.
>
> Pentiums are still useful to schools and other organizations that take PCs
> and refurbish them to donate to schools. Try to find places like this
> where you live.
>
> If you still don't want to do even these simple things, in the very least
> donate your crap to Goodwill. Maybe someone will come across it and find
> it useful. In the very least you can take a tax writeoff.
>
> Sellam
everyone might want to check out this site:
www.freeboxen.com
I just claimed a 286 card for one of my old macs and looks to be a good place
to get rid of some of my extra PS/2 stuff.
DB Young ICQ: 29427634
hurry, hurry, step right up! see the computers you used as a kid!
http://www.nothingtodo.org
>>8088 through 486 PCs and cases away last Tuesday.
>>I coalesced a box of Pentium 50-166 Mhz era motherboards,
>>some brand-new, and for heaven's sake, they would barely
>>fetch a few bucks on eBay.
>
>Goodness. I love 486's. I make them into very handy Linux boxen. They
>and those motherboards are worth shipping to ME at least.
Same here. Of 7 PCs I have 2 are 386/16s and only one a P166 the rest
are
various 486DX/33-->133s. The 486s run NT4/sp4 workstation better than
W95! However for fast, Minix is hard to beat(it's very small). Linux as
in RH5.2
is good on them but Caldara Openlinux2.3 is a bit too fat for them.
Allison
>> VMS isn't a memory pig. Alpha however was aimed at big apps and isn't
>> as byte efficient as VAX so it tends to consume 2x-4x the ram. The
>I think you know what I mean :^) The system in question is an Alpha,
and on
See the comment I left in? Yes, I do know what you mean.
>Alpha's OpenVMS is a memory pig! A quick (SHO CLUS) shows that my 24MB
>VAXstation 4000/VLC is sitting at 60% memory usage, the AlphaStation
500/333
>with 96MB that doesn't have DECwindows loaded on the system is sitting
at
>69%, unfortunatly I don't have either of the workstations with 112MB up
at
>the moment as but running DECwindows I believe they'll be at about 80%,
>IIRC. Of course my main system is only at 20% :^)
An Alpha with 96mb is running faster than the VAX however with 24mb
so you get what you pay for. However in the time frame when they were
both current that Alpha would likely have had 128mb minimum and likely
more and the vax would have been big at 32mb.
It's the difference between the byte oriented VAX and the Word orieneted
Alpha.
>I understand why OpenVMS on an Alpha uses so much memory as opposed to
on a
>VAX, however, the fact remains, it's a memory hog, and like I said based
on
>my very limited Tru64 experience it seems even worse on the exact same
>hardware.
Actually any os on Alpha will be bigger by 4x, it's the instruction
granularity
mostly and also the Alpha is actally less CISC than VAX. The payback is
the 64bit addressing and math.
Allison
Is any one privy to the workings of an the Intel 310? The one I have is
missing a monitor and keyboard and hookup is not immediatly obvious to
me. Also has labeled ports on the back for ethernet, console,
cube. I'm assuming it was the control box for my newly acquired iPSC/1
system. This one is a model "PSYP310", 286/12 8 mhz, 1 meg mem, 140 mb,
45 mb streaming tape & a floppy drive.
Any info appreciated...manual or copy greatly! appreciated....
Craig
From: healyzh(a)aracnet.com <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, October 12, 2000 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: VMS/VAX/Alpha questions...
>Currently the *only* non-DEC drive in my cluster (except those that came
in
>storageworks cannisters) is in a VAXstation 4000/VLC, and I've got major
>problems with it at the moment as a bunch of the files have bad blocks
:^(
I've run a great mix of nonDEC SCSI drives on the 3100s I have and the
CMD interfaced MVII. For MFM I've tried everything I have most are
smaller
than RD53s though but they worked.
>> Does DEC say: "You'll run that RZ25 & *Be Happy About It*", or can I
run
>> non-DEC rommed hard drives just fine?
>>
>> RZ or not RZ, *that* is the question. ;-)
>
>The answer, is hopelessly vague. It depends. It might work, it might
not
>work. OpenVMS and the hardware are only tested with specific drives, as
a
>result the drives may or may not work. The good news is that OpenVMS
V7.2
>is a lot less touchy about this than say VAX/VMS V5.5.
Depends what you have and what interfaces, usually it works fine.
>So, you see the correct answer is, try it and find out. Which
unfortunatly
best answer.
>isn't the one you want trust me I understand as I've looked into
upgrading
>my server to a U2W SCSI controller and Ultra160 drives. As a hobbyist
I'm
>not sure I want to risk buying drives that might not work.
Finding a U2Wscsi for a nonPCI VAX or ALPHA would be real tough.
Though Qantum fireball (scsi-II) at 5.1gb worked fine when I tried it
as a non boot disk on the M76 running VMS7.2. I tried it for laughs
as I was pulled from the server (p133!).
Allison
From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch(a)30below.com>
>I do know about the VAXstation boot drive limitations of 1Gig... For the
>price, I like the 1Giggers better, but they won't do me crap if the VAX
>won't recognize 'em... ;-)
First research that as it only affects certain boxen and only for VMS
crash dumps.
>(I've got a few DEC drives laying around, so I've not tried any non-DEC
>drives in my VAXen yet...)
Try them anyway. They will work most likely.
Besides a 1gb drive is lots of space as VMS isn't a pig like NT or Win2k.
Allison
From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
>CLOSE. But, ... Remove the diodes completely from an alternator.
Select
>pulleys for correct ratio, and simply maintain a steady engine speed to
>provide 3600 RPM at the alternator shaft. Now you have 60Hz 3 phase
>power. Adjust the voltage, and run minis and mainframes.
>You'll need to drive where there is little traffic to maintain that
>constant engine speed.
leave the diodes in and don't use them, bring out the power on leads
>from the other side of the diodes for AC. the rectified power can then
be used for reedback regulation of the AC. did this years ago for
a ~1kw tube TX worked very well. it was cheaper than buying a
HV alternator (120/230v).
the auto system if well maintained can do just fine power wise.
resonable power is around 3-500W at the high side.
Allison
At 06:11 PM 10/11/00 -0400, you wrote:
> > Looking for information about a Compaq Deskpro 286. I have two of
> > them. Would like to know some specs, how to get into the BIOS, etc.
>
>When painted gray (any shade you choose), they make an excellent
>anchor for the bass boat, although the bass (and EPA) may disagree...
I'm surprised I didn't get a hernia carrying that thing home from Goodwill.
Although you just HAVE to love the rubber-mounted harddrive chassis to
reduce vibrations. That's classic.
:)
Tarsi
210
>it would work - in hindsight, I don't know why since I never
>had any intention of getting by with just RT11FB in RT-11.
>Actually, I have both versions - dual and quad.
Same here with matching memory and IO. I can do everything
11/03 to first 11/73 and most version inbetween and a fair number
of backkplanes for them including the heath H11.
I happen to like RT11FB alot.
>I do, just my own opinion - which I believe I stated at the beginning.
>The key point is that when testing software, the emulator is so
>much faster that it runs rings around the real hardware. PLUS -
It can but... Try doing a hardware hack using a DRV11 card with
a static ram hooked to it as a ram disk. You can emulate up to
a point and then it stops.
>and this is a VERY BIG PLUS - I had occasion to attempt
>to debug (or at least understand) the boot code for a stand alone
>program. Try stepping through the boot block of an RX02 on
>a real PDP-11. With the emulator and even rudimentary
I've done it, ODT. Emulators help some here, then again if the
boot block is on a real RX02 (in DD mode) or an RL02. Your
cooked again and must have real hardware.
>In fact, I very much admire someone who can rescue an 11/44
>from the scrap heap. But I do not know how and I am too busy
>in any case. And my back is no longer strong enough.
Me too. I stick to the Qbus as they are quiet, small and low
power.
However to make a point... there is nothing like seeing and hearing
Unix V7 booting on a real RL02. It's satisfying as I've preserved
hardware and demonstrated software that was "of the time" and still
useful.
Allison
Larry Walker wrote:
> I've also got a NEXT which IIRC uses RS423 prot. but has a
>similiar miniDIN. These guys really keep the cable manufacturers
>busy. Again the specs are hard to find. Is there such a thing as a
>repositry of cable connection specs ?
Ooooh ooooh! I can help! A quick cut, paste, ftp, and addition of a little
ascii art later, here, almost straight from the on-line copy of the System
Admin's manual on my NeXT running NeXTStep 3.3 are:
NeXT Computer Serial Ports
Serial ports A and B use 8-pin miniature DIN (MiniDIN-8) connectors. Both
ports on a 68040-based NeXT computer are RS-423 compatible; the ports on a
68030-based NeXT computer are RS-422 compatible (though different). The
following diagram and table describe the pin configuration of each port:
8 7 6
5 4 3
2 1 (ed. drawing makes each location look like a
socket, not a pin, as would be found on the
back side of the computer. That matches my '040 Cube.)
Pin Signal Pin Signal
1 DTR 5 RXD
2 DCD 6 RTS
3 TXD 7 RTXC
4 GND 8 CTS
NeXT-to-Modem Cable (MiniDIN-8 to DB-25)
The following table describes the configuration of a cable used to connect
a 68040-based NeXT computer to an asynchronous modem. This configuration
supports RTS/CTS hardware flow control.
MiniDIN-8 DB-25
Pin Signal Pin Signal
1 DTR 20 DTR
2 DCD 8 DCD
3 TXD 2 TXD
4 GND 7 GND
5 RXD 3 RXD
6 RTS 4 RTS
7 (Not connected)
8 CTS 5 CTS
NeXT Null-Modem Cable (MiniDIN-8 to DB-25)
The following table describes the configuration of a null-modem style cable
used to connect a terminal, printer, or other computer to a NeXT computer.
This configuration supports RTS/CTS hardware flow control.
MiniDIN-8 RS-232
Pin Signal Pin Signal
1 DTR 8 DCD
2 DCD 20 DTR
3 TXD 3 RXD
4 GND 7 GND
5 RXD 2 TXD
6 RTS 5 CTS
7 (Not connected)
8 CTS 4 RTS
NeXT Null-Modem Cable (MiniDIN-8 to MiniDIN-8)
The following table describes the configuration of a null-modem style cable
used to connect two 68040-based NeXT computers. This configuration supports
RTS/CTS hardware flow control.
MiniDIN-8 MiniDIN-8
Pin Signal Pin Signal
1 DTR 2 DCD
2 DCD 1 DTR
3 TXD 5 RXD
4 GND 4 GND
5 RXD 3 TXD
6 RTS 8 CTS
7 (Not connected)
8 CTS 6 RTS
NeXT Null-Modem Cable (DTR Flow Control)
The following table describes the configuration of a null-modem cable used
to connect a NeXT computer to a printer that only supports DTR hardware
flow control, rather than RTS/CTS hardware flow control.
MiniDIN-8 RS-232
Pin Signal Pin Signal
1 DTR 8 DCD
2 DCD 5 CTS
3 TXD 3 RXD
4 GND 7 GND
5 RXD 2 TXD
6 RTS 20 DTR
7 (Not connected)
8 CTS 4 RTS
Heck of a time to ask, but NeXTs are on-topic now right? Right? I hope? The
copyright on the back of my box says (c)1989.
- Mark
FYI.
Q: Need setup disk.
A: Eureka! Try
"http://www.compaq.com/support/files/obsolete_diagnostics.html". I think
the file that you want is the one named "SP0316.zip". Unzip it and it will
create the install file for a 360K disk. The same webpage has the install
file for creating 3.5" disks also.
Joe
Wheeee! I got an OSI Challenger 4P today (does this complete my collection
of early micros with walnut sides? I now have my Sol and NorthStar Horizon
and Challenger.) Of course it would be even better if it worked or at least
I had some documentation. A shielded cable terminating in an RCA phono plug
exits the cabinet. The fan turns and apparently something is being output.
I tried a mono composite monitor with no luck, but channel 11 (?) seems to
give what could be a screen image with several inverse video blocks
scattered down the left side (we have a STRONG channel 3 here, and 4 is
garbage). Pressing "return" shows no change in the screen, nor does
pressing a momentary-contact switch (home-brewed?) above the keyboard
labeled "Break Enable."
Since I never even saw one of these in the 70's, I could use some help.
Does anyone have docs they would be willing to copy for a reasonable fee?
Any other advice cheerfully accepted.
Bob Stek
Saver of Lost Sols
Well, the Beginning of the End for PayPal, as I see it. I predicted it.
It's happening. Oh well!
Now can you see why I detest this low-life pond scum operation? -Mike
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PayPal Raises Fees, Looks For New CEO and Profits
By STACY FORSTER
October 10, 2000
PayPal.com delivered a popular solution to a vexing problem -- how to
send and receive money over the Internet. But the bigger challenge for
the two-year-old start-up will be to make money in the process.
With its sights set on profitability and an initial public offering,
PayPal's parent company, closely held X.com, is looking for a new chief
executive officer. On Sunday, Elon Musk, the founder and chief executive
of X.com (www.x.com), said he is stepping down to allow the company to
bring in a leader with more experience.
"Elon has had great start-up experience, but he's never run a major
public company," says Peter Thiel, chairman of X.com. Mr. Thiel says he
expects the company to be profitable by the end of 2001.
And in move that may be controversial, PayPal will begin charging some
consumers fees on Oct. 16 for a service that used to be free. The
company, which had depended largely on interest income on cash in its
customers' accounts, plans to charge a fee of 1.9% plus 25 cents per
transaction for anyone who receives more than $500 in credit-card
payments in a six-month period. Before, only businesses were charged the
fee.
"They're struggling to come up with the business model," says James
VanDyke, an analyst with New York e-commerce research firm Jupiter
Communications.
PayPal, which launched its service in October 1999, merged with X.com in
March. Analysts say the combined company dominates the online
person-to-person payment business, boasting nearly four million customers
and 300,000 business accounts.
Each day, PayPal completes about 130,000 transactions and moves about $6
million. PayPal says it is accepted by more than half the auctions on
eBay, compared with only 10% for its closest competitor, Billpoint
(www.billpoint.com), a joint venture between eBay Inc. and Wells Fargo &
Co.
PayPal's registered users can send payments to anyone with an e-mail
address by writing a dollar amount on a form at the company Web
site. When the e-mail is sent, the payment is charged to the sender's
bank or credit-card account. If the receivers aren't registered, they can
fill out a form attached to the e-payment to receive the money, which is
waiting in a PayPal account in the receiver's name.
PayPal has grown rapidly by encouraging users to recommend the service to
friends and families, offering a $5 reward for opening an account or
referring a new customer.
But all that has been costly. "They now need to create a strategy that
walks the tightrope between maintaining the critical mass of customers
and figuring out a way to make money," says Paul Jamieson, a financial
services analyst for e-commerce research firm Gomez Advisors in Lincoln,
Mass.
And some customers already are angry. Peter Resnik, a financial
consultant from Nokomis, Fla., who conducts about 100 auctions a month
for antique paper items on eBay, says he feels duped by advertisements
promoting PayPal as a free service. He contends those advertisements were
aimed at the auction sellers who helped PayPal develop its large customer
base.
"They led you down the path with the impression that this was a free
service and there were no strings attached," Mr. Resnik says.
PayPal first began charging fees when it introduced business accounts in
June, says X.com spokesman Vincent Sollitto. Mr. Sollitto says they
PayPal is implementing the new policy because some people were using the
personal accounts for business purposes to avoid fees.
Mr. Thiel says the new policy will affect only about 250,000 customers,
or 6%, of its customer base of four million. Users were notified about
the policy change last week in an e-mail.
X.com's competitors vary on their policies for credit-card
transactions. Ecount.com (www.ecount.com), PayMe.com (www.payme.com) and
PayPlace.com (www.payplace.com) do not charge for credit-card
transactions.
For transactions of more than $15, Billpoint charges 1.75% plus 35 cents
a transaction for business accounts and 2.5% plus 35 cents a transaction
for personal accounts. EMoneyMail (www.emoneymail.com), a payment service
offered by BankOne Corp., charges customers $1 to send money, but there
is no cost to receive funds.
Hi;
I just got a TRS-80 Model 100 Portable computer. It rattled when I picked it
up. After opening it up I see that it has a busted keyboard.
Does anyone have a spare keyboard from a parts 100? I would like to get it up
and running again.
Thanks,
Paxton
Portland, OR
Well, surprise, surprise, I'm responding. The problem with a "free"
offer is that there's always a catch. Which is, no way I can take time
off to get to Toronto for a pickup. Sigh. But it is a realizable
fantasy... Do keep me in mind should you absolutely have to trash the
box someday.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerome Fine <jhfine(a)idirect.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>; Geoffrey G.
Rochat <geoff(a)pkworks.com>; Tarsi <tarsi(a)binhost.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: Free 11/02 (Was: Another PDP-11 available: Wisconsin)
>>Geoffrey G. Rochat wrote:
>
>> If you want to lose one of those 11/2s, please get in touch!
>
>>Tarsi wrote:
>
>> I'm sure I could find room for one as well. :)
>
>Jerome Fine replies:
>
>Well, my wife is recovering from a knee replacement right now, so
>I am the current house spouse. That means no shipping, just local
>pick-up in Toronto. I you want my phone number, just ask and
>we can arrange for a time for you to come and get one.
>
>But you also have to take an empty RL02 cabinet. :)
>
>If anyone responds, I will be surprised - last time I tried to
>unload an 11/34 backplane and power supply, it took over
>a year. It was the only Unibus stuff I had and there was no way
>I could use it. But it would have been sad to see it be just tossed.
>
>Sincerely yours,
>
>Jerome Fine
One place to look for hamfest and fleamarket information is in Nuts &
Volts magazine. Another is to contact Steve Finberg, the MIT Fleamarket
Mavin. Does anyone have his e-mail address?
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Cherry <ncherry(a)home.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: A LART is needed (was: VCF 4.0)
>"R. D. Davis" wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Hans Franke wrote:
>> > PLEASE, give me some break - right around eVCF is a bad idea. The
time
>> > before I may be ocupied by some kind of organisation, while right
>> > after I'm occupied by Sallam :)) Serious, I'd realy love to visit
>> > VCF East, or Midwest or Whatever. In my opinion mid June may be a
>> > reasonable time frame.
>>
>> Great, just what we need on the right coast, something else to cause
>> more damage to hamfests and deplete them of the few remaining
>> "vintage" computers. ...as if e-bilk wasn't bad enough. Does anyone
>> (Tony (DRARD)?) have an appropritately suitable LART for that idiot
>> who wrote the book on computer collecting a few years ago who got all
>> these problems started?
>
>Where can I find out more about the Hamfests in my area (NJ, USA)? I
>was going to attempt to see if any serious effort was being made to
>have a Vintage computer section in the 2001 Trenton Computer Fair. They
>attempted it last year but no one except the a few Ham's with Ham
>equipment showed up (no computers).
>
>--
>Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry
ncherry(a)home.net
>http://members.home.net/ncherry (Text only)
>http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52 (Graphics)
>http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/ (SourceForge)
From: Jerome Fine <jhfine(a)idirect.com>
>The real trouble is that I think you are correct for being very inclined
>to be real PDP-11 hardware oriented. But do you feel it is OK for
>me to be very inclined toward software? If your answer is YES!,
>then we both agree completely. BUT, I will still continue to agree
>that real PDP-11 hardware is great for those who are inclined that
>way!!
Short and to the point I don't consider PDP-11 to be "very hardware".
S100 and autoconstructed are "hardware" to me. On the otherhand
Nothing wrong with being software oriented. I happen to do that
with only one difference, I use native hardware.
Allison
>How do you tell the pinballs apart?
You look at the scratches *very* carefully -- it's like fingerprints :-)
Hey, we normally talk about "pins", think about all the things you
could have said about that :-)
>Well, they are older than my car
Ja, but you live in the states (I assume). Our newest Land-Rover is a
1965, my one is a '59, my wife drives a '55. My Puma is a 1974 (and,
I had to pull up my web page to get that information -- now *THAT'S*
crazy :-)
Restoring? Both Land-Rovers and pinball machines (OK?) can be rebuilt
>from the ground up. Fascinating hobby, these analog computers (And I'm
not talking about the LR, OK?)
Some people, sheesh! :-)
W
> The lack of so-called "vulgar" language in one's vocabulary demonstrates a
> fundamental lack of maturity.
I would say that depends very heavily upon one's definition of the word
"mature". I can report, without regret, that I'm unlikely ever to be
"mature" by that definition - and I was born in 1962.
(I will admit the caveat that a fear of using "vulgar" language, in the
*very rare* situations where it really is appropriate, is also not
necessarily healthy.)
- Mark
If you want to lose one of those 11/2s, please get in touch!
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerome Fine <jhfine(a)idirect.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: Another PDP-11 available: Wisconsin
>>ajp166 wrote:
>
>> On the other hand the posting was rather strong. There is nothing
>> wrong with an 11/2. True an 11/23 has more oomph and all but an
>> 11/2 is configurable as a very nice small machine. Paying 100$
>> for one is questionable in my mind on because they were so
>> common (over 100,000 cpu boards made). I have a few.
>
>Jerome Fine replies:
>
>I have a few as well - and if I can ever find someone to actually use
>them, they will go for free. I can't ever remember actually using
>one although I might have attempted to test one just to see if
>it would work - in hindsight, I don't know why since I never
>had any intention of getting by with just RT11FB in RT-11.
>Actually, I have both versions - dual and quad.
>
>This is not a slight on those who like hardware far more than
>I do, just my own opinion - which I believe I stated at the beginning.
>The key point is that when testing software, the emulator is so
>much faster that it runs rings around the real hardware. PLUS -
>and this is a VERY BIG PLUS - I had occasion to attempt
>to debug (or at least understand) the boot code for a stand alone
>program. Try stepping through the boot block of an RX02 on
>a real PDP-11. With the emulator and even rudimentary
>[Thank goodness for the spell checker!!] debugging facilities
>(only one break point address - but at least single step was
>enabled), it was trivial - after all, there was only a single block
>of code to debug.
>
>In fact, I very much admire someone who can rescue an 11/44
>from the scrap heap. But I do not know how and I am too busy
>in any case. And my back is no longer strong enough.
>
>Sincerely yours,
>
>Jerome Fine
Speaking of ebay: here is a $700 commodore 64 with the reserve not met
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=454431985
Francois
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Cherry <ncherry(a)home.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: Moving a Microvax II
>Will Jennings wrote:
>>
>> Haha, ah yes... gotta love Virgil Rice.. I bought something from him once
>> and even though I picked it up from his house, he still wanted me to pay
>> like 30 bucks shipping.. He has lots of cool stuff that I'd love to buy,
but
>> not at the kind of prices he wants for it.. It would be far less
irritating
>> were he not only about 40 minutes from me... He has an HP 21MX that I've
>> drooled over but he wanted like 700 dollars for it... Hell, he wanted 200
>> bucks apiece just for empty HP racks... Sorry for the rant, but people
who
>> would rather throw stuff out because they can't get what they think its
>> "worth" truly irritate me... I'm not asking people to give everything
away,
>> just to be reasonable about negotiating...
>
>I'm not getting it from Virgil, I'm getting it from someone else (I let
them
>chime in if they so choose :-). I'm getting it at what I consider a fair
>price and I'm not paying shipping (but I will be paying tolls, I think).
>
>As far as the rant, that's OK, I've noticed a few people on ebay failing
>to understand the true value of various computer equipment. Note to those
>who wish put stuff on ebay:
>
>1) If it's heavy you're in trouble unless it's really rare (not like
> a steak :-).
>2) Reserves are a pain, I've seen lots of stuff get ignored because
> of reserves. Heck I've even bid on equipment only to discover I
> couldn't go above the reserve.
>3) Try to get a picture and if you do get a clear one.
>4) If I can buy the same device used for around the same price, I'll
> ignore the item.
>
>I have more rants but I can't remember them all.
>
>--
>Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry(a)home.net
>http://members.home.net/ncherry (Text only)
>http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52 (Graphics)
>http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/ (SourceForge)
From: Daniel T. Burrows <dburrows(a)netpath.net>
>Also some of the 12v UPS's will not start from just battery. They have
to
>"fail over to battery" I do have a 1KVA Triplite that is 12V and does
start
>from just battery. So keep your eyes open for those.
>>"Shawn T. Rutledge" wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 05:25:23AM -0800, Mike Ford wrote:
>>> > I have some 48-57 vdc input, otherwise PC normal output power
supplies
>for
>>> > about $5 each. Ask now if anybody wants some, basically I "think"
new
>units
This is something I'd like to get a few of. I have one CP/M system I've
built that runs from battery/solar but I'd like to find some power
supplies
for 12v to +5/+12/-12 for more hacking.
Allison