From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
>>The DOS analog of that would be Windows3.1 is not DOS.
>>See the point!
>
> ????? I don't understand this comment. Or at least I hope I don't.
ZCPR
>isn't a GUI. It's nothing like Windozes, it's a MUCH better command line
>interface.
Well CCP is a user interface as is command.com, changing out command.com
for Win3.1 still doesnt change the fact that it's a DOS OS with a GUI
instend
of Command line.
So goes it for CP/M, CCP or ZCPR are only a 2k loadable module that can
be replaced with anything. For example CONIX is one that can be run over
CCP for a unix like command line.
>>Now ZRDOS or ZSDOS is a totally different codebase and
>>non DRI product that is CP/M compatable and draws form
>>the ZCPRx lineage.
>
> I can't say that I've ever heard of them.
It's part of the line starting with P2DOS, suprbdos, Novados, Zdos
and a few I may have forgotton. Their rewritten versions (some from
virgins) of code that is CP/M files and program compatable. Most
Z80 code, faster and most also offer a higher (1gb) logical drive
size limit.
> BTW one of my current projects uses MP/M. CP/M is childs play
compared
>to it! The hardwre isn't that much more complicated but the operating
>system is MUCH more complex.
Not really. I have CPM3 and MPM as well. The bios is a bit more
convoluted
to allow for memory management and interprocess communication but
most of the differences are transparent. the Docs for those two are
noticably
weaker and add an air of mystery.
I've taken the path of adding job scheduling and interprocess managment
to cpm2.2 as it had nothing to prevent it.
Allison
Several days ago I wrote:
> Idea, contest time! We need a name for the form of insanity whereby
> you continue to haul home DEC.
To which Neil Cherry <ncherry(a)home.net> replied:
> D.E.C.^2 ( Dee Eee Cee Squared), DEC Conservationists, what else (see
> your statements below). It's not an illness, it's an enviromental
> concern. :-)
And Sellam Ismail <foo(a)siconic.com> also replied:
> Mental DECay?
>
> har har
I will have to pick Sellam as the winner.
Then in an email this morning from Germany:
> I managed to install VMS 6.1 (VAX) from scratch with a license PAK i
> 'borrowed' from a Mentally DECayed person on this machine but i do not
> have any UCX installed for two reasons
Sellam, as the originator of this, your legacy is going to be such
that you were the first person associated with this form of insanity. ;)
Mike
At 10:41 AM 11/2/00 -0500, you wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, I'm interested in the disks! A friend of mine wants to try and
>> install it on a H-89. I'll look through my ZCPR stuff and see
>> if I can find
>> out what the differences are in verson 2.2 and 3.0 and report later.
>
>Ok, if I have time (I've tenatively got a rescue planned for this
>weekend), I'll try to dig them out this weekend.
Great. I'm looking forward to getting them. I haven't found anything
that can read my SB-180 disks so I hven't been able to transfer the ZCPR to
anything else yet. I think it would be cool to get it running on a PC!
I stuck out. I looked through my ZCPR docs and book but none of them
tell what the differences are between ZCPR3 and ZCPR 2.2. "ZCPR, The
Manual" only gives the differences between ZCPR3 and CP/M 2.2. I don't
know anything about the earlier versions of ZCPR so I guess I'm no help.
Joe
>
>Regards,
>-dq
>
>
I keep meaning to ask this... I have an ancient B&C Microsystems
universal programmer, model UP600a. I'm running version 3.0something
of the software. The largest device I can program is half of a 27040
at a a time. At one point in the past, I tried to download the newer
personality files from the B&C Microsystems BBS, but the file was
corrupt (full of text garbage, as if caused by either a rampant disk
overwrite or a disgruntled employee or customer).
Does anyone out there happen to have one of these beasts? I'd love
newer software that supported newer devices, both memory (EPROM) and
logic (PAL/GAL, etc.).
Thanks,
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
>From homework help to love advice, Yahoo! Experts has your answer.
http://experts.yahoo.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Erlacher <richard(a)idcomm.com>
>Yes, you can, but you can't buy a single-chip microcontroller, using the
Z80
>core, not some "sorta" Z80-like" thing, that requires no external
components
>except a clock.
Who really cares howmany angels can dance on the head of a pin. As most
products are rarely just one chip, especially something that needs Z80
level performance. In the end the skills needed would be Z80(or some
other)
programming.
Allison
I have a Nupon LTS-4 terminal server and I'm wondering if anyone has
software for the beast. I managed to find software for it but the
software appears to be for a model with a different serial interface (a
newer Cirrus chip, this one has a CL-CD180-10PC-C). The symptom is if I
set the buad rate to 9600 it runs at ~7K (or about a 20% error). I'm
not really proficient at 386SX disassembly (yet) so I can't find the
rate table to adjust them. Any ideas?
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry(a)home.net
http://members.home.net/ncherry (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52 (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/ (SourceForge)
From: Richard Erlacher <richard(a)idcomm.com>
>> From: Richard Erlacher <richard(a)idcomm.com>
>>
>>
>> Use the editor that comes with the mailer, please.
>>
>
>What???
Unless your system is severely crippled your Email has an
editor that will allow your to strip the excess non relevent text.
Try it, make it easier to read on the other end.
>> I havent a clue why you said that at all since the origin of the
smallc-c
>> compiler is 8080? I still have the original DDJ articles with
sources.
>>
>What I said (I thought) was that I don't want to fiddle with small-C to
the
>extent of writing a new code generator for the 'HC11, 'HC05's,
805x-series,
>PIC, etc, since Hi-Tech already has a code generator for their compiler
for
No problem with that. But I thought the initial problem was testing a
bunch
of ISBC8020s? Where did all the other excess about other cpus come
into that?
>each of those. It would be a BIG job to do that for the Hendrix
compiler,
>reduced though it is, since what's needed is a general enough compiler
that
>once I write a debug monitor based on some existing model I already have
and
I wouldn't know, I did did the later version for Z80 with TDL opcodes.
>know. It's not enough that the 8080 and Z80 are already supported,
since
Also 8088 and maybe later.
>I'll only need to use the 8080, which, BTW, it's not obvious that the
>Hi-Tech 'C' supports. As I said, if I'm going to wander into the
quagmire,
I avoid the quagmire and use asm.
>the near future. I'm quite sure nobody is going to hire me to generate
code
>for the Z80 or 8080. I've been known to write code in assembler as
well,
>but haven't done anything for hire in about 10 years that has required
Z80
>or 8080 coding.
While I understand the desire it's all outside the scope of the original
problem to test and apparently use a bunch of 8085 multibus cards.
Oh, z80 is still out there as Z180, Z380 and Rabbit for embedded
apps and CPU library cores in gate arrays.
Allison
> It was thus said that the Great Douglas Quebbeman once stated:
> >
> > However, Multics could be re-implemented on any architecture
> > that either provides a paged, segmented virtual memory with
> > rings of protection, or, on any architecture fast enough that
> > those features could be emulated.
>
> Like the Intel 80386 or higher.
>
> -spc (Now I have to find info on Multics ... )
I should have mentioned that Multics also was closely tied
to a 36-bit word size... a re-implementation could probably
get around this, but a port would be difficult...
However, a port would work for an emulator, where you'd have
control of all aspects of the target architecture.
Regards,
-dq
I have a Heathkit EC-1 Educational Analog Computer with original
manual I'd like to sell. The computer is in unknown functional
condition (I don't know if it works right or not) but it looks pretty
good. I'd guess I'd have to sell it as unworking. All the parts are
there but some of the knobs are "stiff". This EC-1 was in storage
since the 1970's ...... it was with some electronic test equipment I
purchased at a surplus sale at a college.
If you have an idea of it's worth .... either to a collector or as a
parts unit please email me at badger(a)vbe.com
Thanks, Mike Melland, W9WIS (Oshkosh,WI)
Hi Group:
I am in need of an M7891-DB or similar memory board for my pdp-11/34A.
The specs on this memory are: 128 Kword, 18 bit, parity RAM. Size is not
important in this case, I'll take a compatible board with less RAM on it.
Please reply to the news group. list, or to me directly. I have stuff to
trade or will purchase if necessary!
Thanks,
Kevin
--
Kevin McQuiggin VE7ZD
mcquiggi(a)sfu.ca
Yep, it's been 2 months and I still am not able to get my basic membership
yet. Today I tried rejoining (3rd time) and now I get internal server
errors. At this rate I'll never be able to get the OpenVMS CD kit.
BTW, if I have 2 VAX do I need to order 2 kits?
--
Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry(a)home.net
http://members.home.net/ncherry (Text only)
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/lightsey/52 (Graphics)
http://linuxha.sourceforge.net/ (SourceForge)
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:46:41, Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:25:34, Jeffrey l Kaneko <jeff.kaneko(a)juno.com> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:53:32 EST Mzthompson(a)aol.com writes:
>>
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>> 3) Sigma Information Systems
>>>
>>> This card appears to be a disk controller. It has 4 WDC TR1865PL
>>> controller
>>> chips on it and there are 4 ten pin header connectors on the card
>>> edge.
>>>
>>> Numbers:
>>> Assy 400200
>>> CPX-6-0
>>
>>This is probably a serial I/O card; the TR1865's are UARTS . . . .
>
>
>Jeff is probably right. Here's part of a message that I posted a month or
>so ago about a 11/23 that I have. It also has a Sigma Information Systems
>card in it and the card is connected the TT and LP0 ports. I didn't make a
>list of the chips while I had the card out. Sorry.
>
> Joe
>
> to On September 22, Joe wrote:
>
> <snip>
Thanks guys for the correction. In my haste to complete the list I saw
'WDC' and jump to the conclusion about being a disk controller. I did
not pause to look up the IC in the IC Master or any data books. Duh!
Although I removed the card cage and boards from the box, I did go
check and sure enough, the only ten pin connector goes to a DB25
coming out the back.
Again, thanks, and sorry 'bout that.
Mike
From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
> Certainly even the earliest of CP/M releases offered more
>than the North Star DOS that would've shipped with thier disk
>systems? This system included DOS ver. 2 and BASIC ver. 6, Release 3
>and is also copyright 1977.
Actually no. NSdos was a simpler file system but actually robust and
very fast. It lacked editor/assember/debugger but did have a good set of
diags for ram, monitor and NS* BASIC. Which for it's time was pretty
good. Also it could boot in as little as 4k of ram and run basic in 24k.
Allison
Hi,
Yes, I'm interested in the disks! A friend of mine wants to try and
install it on a H-89. I'll look through my ZCPR stuff and see if I can find
out what the differences are in verson 2.2 and 3.0 and report later.
Joe
At 09:31 AM 11/2/00 -0500, you wrote:
>> At 06:47 PM 11/1/00 -0500, you wrote:
>> >From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
>> >
>> >>I used to think that CP/M was great but I just got a
>> >>system with ZCPR3 and it's dynamite!
>> >>
>> >> Joe
>> >
>> >To make a point. ZCPRx is CP/M!
>
>I spent a log of time customizing ZCPR 2.2, but never
>got around to moving to ZCPR3.
>
>Can anyone give a thumbnail sketch of the differences,
>keeping in mind that I'm fairly familiar with the 2.2
>version?
>
>In addition to tweaking & adding stuff to ZCPR2.2, I
>also adapted someone else's take on implementing
>resident system extensions (RSXs) under CP/M 2.2/ZCPR,
>as well as putting together a small library of RSXs
>that would work with it (as well as CP/M 3).
>
>Any interest in that stuff? I think the floppies may
>still be readable...
>
>-dq
>
Greetings
I have an elderly version of ultrix (4.2A) which knows nothing of disks of
mind boggling capacity such as the two gigabyte RF73.
Does anyone have a later version of Ultrix with the dimensions of this
disk specified in the /etc/disktab file?
(p.s. has anyone else noticed that Altavista seems to be lamed
deliberately or otherwise so that Linux or Netscape clients can no longer
search properly? I have noticed this for a couple of weeks...I go into
work and use Internet Extorter on NT and everything is fine.)
Thanks in advance
Paul
OK.
I've been quiet long enough, I think. <grin>
Now it is time to ask a question.
I have an old Cadnetix 50000S workstation. It still works - sortuv.
I would like to find a replacement board for the ailing one (graphics),
or locate technical manuals on this beastie.
What is a Cadnetix 50000S? It is a CAD workstation that performs
Schematic Capture, PCB Layouts, runs Berkeley unix (I think it's
Berkeley), uses a 68020 processor, and can still run rings around many
Windows CAD software packages... ok, just barely. <grin>
What I'd _really_ like is to find one of the Sun-2 Cadnetix platforms.
(I think it was a Sun-2 - it's been a while folks.)
Now, these puppies - they could really scream!
Anyway, I saw a bit on the 50000S platforms a while back - was just
wondering if anyone might still have one and want to swap something or
other.
I know where there is a Cadnetix burial ground - it's just that I'd have
to pay homage to the groundskeeper.
Regards,
James Jackson
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I'm interested in the disks! A friend of mine wants to try and
> install it on a H-89. I'll look through my ZCPR stuff and see
> if I can find
> out what the differences are in verson 2.2 and 3.0 and report later.
Ok, if I have time (I've tenatively got a rescue planned for this
weekend), I'll try to dig them out this weekend.
Regards,
-dq
> Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > We only just in the last few weeks finally got a listing of the
> > full DPS-8/M instruction set (or was it the Level 68?) posted to
> > the web. So at least one of the most important resources for
> > getting started is now available...
>
> Oh, do you have a link?
You'll find them near the bottom of:
http://www.multicians.org/features.html
-dq
I don't know but enjoy it while you can! I gave up on Yahoo, Hotbot and
the others because they took too blasted long to load (and still didn't
find as much).
Joe
At 12:36 AM 11/2/00 -0500, Jeff wrote:
>I have to agree. Though Google returns a lot of unuseable information, it
>has proved to be my best resource when searching the impossible. Google
>is the God of search engines. I'd use it even if the did have as as do
>most competitors.
>
>Why don't they have ads? It mystifies me.
>
>Regards,
>
>Jeff
>
>
>As for AltaVista I gave it up for Google.com, why? because google's search
> page is advertisement free and it returns better hits than Altavista
>does.
>
>--Chuck
>
>
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>Jeffrey S. Worley
>President
>Complete Computer Services, Inc.
>30 Greenwood Rd.
>Asheville, NC 28803
>828-277-5959
>Visit our website at HTTP://www.Real-Techs.com
>THETechnoid(a)home.com
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
> I used to think that CP/M was great but I just got a system with
ZCPR3
>and it's dynamite!
>
> Joe
To make a point. ZCPRx is CP/M! ZCPR is a replacement for the
rather anemic CCP (console command processor) and a few
additional utilities. Of ten the BDOS and BIOS are unchanged
and that is the core of CP/M. The CCP is user interface.
The DOS analog of that would be Windows3.1 is not DOS.
See the point!
Now ZRDOS or ZSDOS is a totally different codebase and
non DRI product that is CP/M compatable and draws form
the ZCPRx lineage.
Allison
> At 06:47 PM 11/1/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
> >
> >>I used to think that CP/M was great but I just got a
> >>system with ZCPR3 and it's dynamite!
> >>
> >> Joe
> >
> >To make a point. ZCPRx is CP/M!
I spent a log of time customizing ZCPR 2.2, but never
got around to moving to ZCPR3.
Can anyone give a thumbnail sketch of the differences,
keeping in mind that I'm fairly familiar with the 2.2
version?
In addition to tweaking & adding stuff to ZCPR2.2, I
also adapted someone else's take on implementing
resident system extensions (RSXs) under CP/M 2.2/ZCPR,
as well as putting together a small library of RSXs
that would work with it (as well as CP/M 3).
Any interest in that stuff? I think the floppies may
still be readable...
-dq
Jeff,
It sounds to me like you don't want to live very long. Big power
hungery computers and old inadaquete wiring just don't work well together.
Joe
At 06:15 PM 11/1/00 -0500, Jeff wrote:
>What ground? ;-)
>
>I live in an older house with cloth-covered wireing and no three prong
>jacks except in the laundry room, the kitchen, and the bathroom. I know,
>I'll get around to rewiring, but everything has been running just great
>groundlessly.
>
>You don't want to walk barefoot on the slab in the basement and touch
>anything metal though.....
>
>Regards,
>
>Jeff
>
>
>In <20001101172512.22087.qmail(a)brouhaha.com>, on 11/01/00
> at 06:15 PM, Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> said:
>
>>> The phase shift is 180 degrees! :-) Yes, it's 220 VAC, center tapped
>>> and the center tap is tied to neutral (not ground). The neutrals aren't
>>> supposed to be tied to ground but a lot of people do it anyway.
>
>>Unless things are much different in Florida, the neutral is supposed to
>>be tied to ground in *exactly* one place for the entire building, and
>>that place is at the main breaker panel. So I assume you meant that
>>people add additional neutral-ground connections elsewhere, which is
>>*bad*.
>
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>Jeffrey S. Worley
>President
>Complete Computer Services, Inc.
>30 Greenwood Rd.
>Asheville, NC 28803
>828-277-5959
>Visit our website at HTTP://www.Real-Techs.com
>THETechnoid(a)home.com
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
From: Andreas Meyer <ysgdhio(a)yahoo.com>
>
>I'm sure someone here can tell me...
>Does the DEC VT05 terminal use RS232 or is it 20ma loop?
In a word. Yes. Both.
Allison
From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
> NSdos is what I plan on doing the initial tests of the
>machine with anyway, given it's smaller memory requirement. It's
>manuals seem to do a decent job at describing how to config it for
>various hardware. With luck, at least one of these hard-sectored
>diskettes will still prove usable!
NS* DOS is a good place to start. Once you have the IO right for that
then doing it for CP/M will be fairly easy.
Allison
Upon the date 12:33 PM 10/31/00 -0800, Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) said something
like:
>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Hans Franke wrote:
>> > Possible - it seams like you got way to much stuff.
>> > As a matter of our friendship I may offer my help
>> > and order a 40' container to help - I may even pay
>> > the shiping cost :)
>
>On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Sellam Ismail wrote:
>> Hans, bring a few containers. You can have it all. Come and get it.
>> Don't say I never did anything nice for you :)
>
>In the interest of international relations, we'll ALL help fill Hans'
>containerS.
Right on Fred! I've got almost half of my garage full of big DEC gear Hans
could use as swapping material in Deutschland. (You've seen it Hans)
Servus, Chris
-- --
Christian Fandt, Electronic/Electrical Historian
Jamestown, NY USA cfandt(a)netsync.net
Member of Antique Wireless Association
URL: http://www.antiquewireless.org/
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > Additionally, this is not a Honeywell 6180 being offered,
> > but a DPS-8/M.
>
> I wonder if my DPS-6 could run Multics? I would like to think it has to
> have some coolness factor other than being big and impressive :)
No. The DPS-6 cannot run Multics. In fact, a DPS-8 can't run Multics,
only the DPS-8/M can (in addition to the 6180 and GE 645).
However, Multics could be re-implemented on any architecture
that either provides a paged, segmented virtual memory with
rings of protection, or, on any architecture fast enough that
those features could be emulated.
regards,
-dq
Hello,
I found this group while looking for information on an archaic computer
system.
I have several systems at home that may qualify as 'classic'
computers...
a Heathkit 6500 computer trainer (I think) with documentation
SWTPC 6800 - in storage with a hefty 4k RAM
Amiga 1000
Amiga 4000
...and a few others.
I am going home tonight to look at them and see if I might have
something of interest for someone else.
Intel (360?) Multi-Bus I system used for development... complete with
software and manuals.
I also have much documentation. I'm a packrat when it comes to User's
Manuals.
But it is now time to clean out the storage room. <sigh>
I have information for those of you with Amiga 4000's for repairing your
A3640 CPU boards. This is on my web site.
Also - for replacing the capacitors in the Audio section. (This applies
to any of the Amiga series. They used polarized caps in a uni-polar
output stage of an op-amp.)
Regards,
James Jackson
James Jackson Oztronics
1631 Escalon Ave., Suite B San Antonio, TX 78221-3126
210-921-1758 FX: 210-921-0124 http://joj.home.texas.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 10:24 PM
Subject: Re: CP/M 1.3 memory requirement
> I show that DR copyrighted CP/M in May, 1976. Around what
>time did they actually start shipping it and what was the first
>'usable' release?
>
> Jeff
There was 1.2 but usable is not what I'd call it. I'd say 1.4
was the first commercially viable version but, 1.3 was the
first complete working one.
Allison
HP SRMs (pre-Unix - will run HP BASIC) available
Some CPUs, some hard drives. All have HPIB ports.
Possibly some printers.
and
HP 340's (diskless) with ethernet, HPIB, serial, & parallel built in.
Will run Unix.
Your cost on any of these would be shipping plus packing at Mailboxes,
Etc., plus $10 per item for us to haul them from the basement, put
them in our trailer and tote them to Mailboxes.
If you're interested, let me know ASAP, as they go to the scrapper on
Monday, 10/30/00 when the company's lease runs out. If you're
familiar with HP stuff and want details, please contact me. If you're
not familiar, I can't help you much, although I *can* read numbers
>from front panels if there's anything in particular you're looking
for. Just trying to save some good, old hardware from the shredder.
It's located in Lincoln, Nebraska, so if you're within driving
distance this weekend, we can probably arrange something to save you
shipping and handling.
Bill Richman
bill_r(a)inetnebr.com
http://incolor.inetnebr.com
Home of Fun with Molten Metal, technological
oddities, and the original COSMAC Elf
computer simulator!
> Sellam Ismail wrote:
> > I wonder if my DPS-6 could run Multics? I would like to think it has to
> > have some coolness factor other than being big and impressive :)
>
> Having worked on both (although in the case of the DPS-6 only briefly) I'm
> fairly sure that they're not. For one thing IIRC, GCOS-6 and GCOS-8 were
at
> least somewhat different.
>
> What someone really needs to do is write a freeware emulator for the
DPS-8.
> I know at least one commercial DPS-6 emulator exists. And, no, I'm not
> about to tackle writing one.
>
> Personally I think the DPS-6 is a bit boring, but a multiprocessor DPS-8
> configuration is a really cool piece of hardware!
We only just in the last few weeks finally got a listing of the
full DPS-8/M instruction set (or was it the Level 68?) posted to
the web. So at least one of the most important resources for
getting started is now available...
-dq
From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
> CP/M On North Star Disk
> Copyright 1977 Digital Research
> Copyright 1977 Lifeboat Associates
> Version 1.30 Serial No. 14-040
>
> Jeff
Thats a find. I'd assume it want 4k more than base 1.3 due to the NS*
drivers
and the way Lifeboat did it. so 20k should do and with say 48k your
covered.
Allison
Hi
Bought several XM3301B Toshiba CDROM drives very cheap.
(I am looking for some caddys by the way...anybody got some they wanna throw out?)
Trying to use these on old compact MACs and MAC IIs using Mac OS 7.5.5
Used a driver that sees cdrom drive (icon with scsi id for drive appears on os startup) as soon as iso9660 format cd is inserted, it reports that it cant read the disk, it reports the size of the data used up on disk and asks if I wanna format it or eject it...
All support files are in the extensions folder (high sierra, foreign files acces...etc...)
I am using a driver that says it supports the xm3301 is the readme file. (something from lacie company...off a www page with older MAC drivers.)
I have tried apple generic cdrom support. Does not see the xm3301b. (whats the b for anyways?)
I have used a newer Pionner scsi cdrom with pionner driver on the same system with success.
The newer pionner drive with same driver/support file does same thing....
This must be something simple I cant see...but I am no MAC OS expert...
Thanks for reading
Claude
On Oct 31, 22:07, Claude.W wrote:
>
> [ Attachment (multipart/alternative): 3891 bytes ]
(BTW, please don't post HTML to the list)
> Used a driver that sees cdrom drive (icon with scsi id for drive appears
=
> on os startup) as soon as iso9660 format cd is inserted, it reports that
=
> it cant read the disk, it reports the size of the data used up on disk =
> and asks if I wanna format it or eject it...
Probably the block size. The older Macs require the blocksize on the CDROM
to be set to 512 bytes, as do older Suns and SGIs (newer machines work with
normal 2048-byte blocks, and issue a SCSI command to reset the size). To
fix this requires some minor surgery on the drive. This works for XM3301
and XM3401, but not XM3601 or later, BTW. I believe it works for XM5401
but I can't be sure about others.
On the 3301/3401 PCB, there are two solder pads near the rear right corner.
Each looks like two semicircles bridgeed together, and they might be
labelled 0 and 1 -- if not, 0 is the one nearest the edge of the PCB. The
default setting (for PCs) is for 2048-byte blocks. Cutting the bridge
between the two halfs of either or both pads gives you 512-byte blocks; the
resulting three possibilities are supposed to be for different systems:
open, open Sun bootable
open, shorted SGI bootable
shorted, open generic 512-byte
shorted, shorted normal 2048-byte (default)
I've fitted a DIP switch to all my old Toshibas, so I can move them between
systems fairly easily.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On October 31, Don Maslin wrote:
> > The 5360, as well as the 5340 (S/34), are 220 volt single phase (actually
> > 2-phase if you want to be exact). The way I hook mine up is to open the
>
> Oh? What is the phase shift between the "2-phase"s? Isn't it really
> just 220 volt center tapped?
180 degrees, if your feed is 220v 2-phase. If you have 3-phase power,
you'll likely be feeding a breaker box from two of the three phases,
which would then be 120 degrees apart. That would, I believe,
technically be 208v, not 220v.
It wouldn't really be 220v center-tapped, though, at least not the
way I'm used to thinking about it.
-Dave McGuire
On October 29, ajp166 wrote:
> > I explained that I was running a Z80-based general-purpose computer
> >fifteen years ago (an IMSAI with a CCS Z80 CPU board which I still
>
> Late adoptor? the first Z80 for me was 1977 (january), NS* running
> at the astronomical speed of 4mhz. That makes that board 23.8
> years old.
Well, I suppose it was more like seventeen years ago...I was
thirteen...
> >have) as my main machine, and that the Z80 processor was a
> >general-purpose machine that was very popular in the 70s and 80s...and
> >was definitely nothing "new".
> >
> > Know what? HE DIDN'T BELIEVE ME!!
>
> Caution clue LART in use. I'd have smacked him in the snout with a
> rolled up Zilog data book, Ca 1976.
I'll be showing him mine next week. :)
> > So, yes, folks...the Z80 seems to be gearing up for a second
> >life...this time as an embedded processor. There are many variations
>
> No, its been there for the last, oh 15 years doing that.
Of course, but now it's *only* doing that, mainstream-wise. I was
attempting to point out the shift in role from being a mainstream
general-purpose processor to being one used almost entirely for
embedded applications.
-Dave McGuire
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey l Kaneko <jeff.kaneko(a)juno.com>
>
>
>On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:53:32 EST Mzthompson(a)aol.com writes:
>> ----------------------------------------
>> 3) Sigma Information Systems
>>
>> This card appears to be a disk controller. It has 4 WDC TR1865PL
>> controller
>> chips on it and there are 4 ten pin header connectors on the card
>> edge.
>>
>> Numbers:
>> Assy 400200
>> CPX-6-0
>
>This is probably a serial I/O card; the TR1865's are UARTS . . . .
Its one of three third party designs for a DLV11 using same
connectors/cables.
Allison
From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
>For the less-common machines it might be interesting to keep a kind
>of database or registry. It's something that other hobbies do. It'd
>be quite a task though!
A good thought.
On the same note my wish list periodically posted.
IMP-48 manuals (IMSAI 8048 based SBC)
Cincinatti Millicron 2xxx (2000, 2100 or 2200 series) Anything! It's a
16bitter
1972 from memory.
Allison
From: Richard Erlacher <richard(a)idcomm.com>
>Single-chipper is the key term, though. The Z80 isn't a single-chipper,
nor
>is the 64180 or the Z380, or the 6502. The fact that the parts count is
>greater than it would be with a comparably capable MCU is what's made
this
Z80 is available as a library core for fully embedded systems. In that
case
it's very true to the single chip idea. Not unlike some of the 6800,
6502
designs.
Allison
These are free for the cost of shipping from Ann Arbor, MI. Please
contact me off list if interested, and I'll supply the owners email
address.
Bill
?
Your computer will do far more than you ever expected it to,
and that won't be enough.
Pournelle's First Law
Dear Bill,
Way back in February you put in a bid on my Z100. As
you no doubt surmised, you were outbid and the Z100
went to a collector out in California. For your
information, the winning bid was $350 and that was just
for the computer and monitor.
Looking over my basement recently I came across the two
other items that were part of my Z100 setup, namely the
JX-80 printer and the Summagraphics graphics tablet.
These are boxed up in their original cartons, complete
with documentation and ready to ship.
You didn't get my Z100, but I thought you might want
these other beautiful vintage items, still in good
working order. You can have them for the cost of UPS
shipment. The JX-80, boxed up, weighs about 25 lb. The
tablet, boxed up, weighs about 10 lb. I'm in Ann Arbor,
Michigan, which is about a 5 hour drive from
Washington, PA. (Shipping should be less than $20).
If you ever get your hands on a working Z100 I'd be
glad to send you my Blokpix software at no charge.
I quote here below the text of the description I sent
out to you about this equipment.
------------------------------------------------------
Additional hardware supported by Blokpix is a
Summagraphics graphics tablet with a 2-button stylus
and a 4-button cursor. Attaches to the serial port. The
active surface of the tablet is 12" x 12". Also an
Epson JX-80 color dot matrix printer, which we used to
print out our designs. Attaches to the parallel port.
I still have a few unused 4-color ribbons for this
printer, but they may well be dried out by now. Such
ribbons can be reinked. There are a couple of places
that do this kind of reinking. Epson no longer makes
the ribbons, but you can still get black ribbons that
work on it. These are for MX-80 or FX-80 machines.
I'll be glad to throw in a handsome custom-designed
lucite printer stand. This is a good workhorse 9-pin
printer, still working fine.
The most interesting software is that which I wrote
myself. I have a graphics program called Blokpix that
my wife and I used for years to design repeating
designs for the fabric, apparel and wallpaper
industries. You can have this. I even wrote a manual
for it. I also wrote a demo program that displays
graphic designs until you stop it. It can be
controlled by writing a script. You can have this
program along with the script I wrote for showing off
our designs at trade shows. This makes a nice display.
------------------------------------------------------
If you want the lucite stand, that will have to go in a
separate box. It would add another dollar or two to
the shipping cost.
Bill, please let me know soon if you would like these
items. If not, they will go to the local recycling
center where they will be cannibalized for valuable
metals. At least they will not go into the landfill.
But I'd much rather see their working lives extended by
a caring collector like you.
Bob
Well I don't post my finds often but I think these are ok for up
north...and for a hamfest, these prices are good...also managed to
unload a ton of non-vintage stuff that accumulates like magic here in my
basement...had to almost give it away, still I was determined not to
bring anything back...except these finds...
I am posting the prices cause it can only maybe help deflate those
"inflated" e-bay prices...these are all canadian $'s...these days
$1can=$0.65-$0.70us...
TRS80 PT210 terminal (original owner/manual works) $10
TRS80 100 portable $10 (needed 2 keys fixed now ok)
TRS80 102 portable $10 (oxydation in power connector now all ok)
1 box full of TRS80 COCO stuff (coco, drives, interface etc...)
including old RS catalogs from early 1980's $5
1 SCSI CDROM tower with 4 NEC caddyless 2X CDdrives $10 (not true
vintage but good find IMO)
1 Xtra clean MAC SE complete $10
1 Eprom programmer PC card/zif socket $10
I am still hunting for a TRS80 model III. I think I am due...
Claude
Hi
Hate to throw this one in garbage, it's like new.
Looking for pinout for signal and specs for a (1985 production date) NEC
JC-1216DFA COLOR CHARACTER DISPLAY monitor.
Looks like a standard ttl color but its got a 8 pin (2 rows 4 pins with
2 top ones spaced for polarisation with DND stamped on it) connector
that I have only seen on old (1970-1980) video camera equipement and
such. Never seen this for a computer video signal connector.
I looked inside and judging from the chips around the input connector
looks like it's ttl color. Did not bother to trace circuit more to
figure out pinout. Taught someone would know...
Before I throw it out or give it away, I want to know more, see if it
can be used in some way for me...
Thanks for reading
Claude
Hello,
I've gotten mail from the guy who is supervising the
decommisioning of the Canadian DND Multics System at
Halifax. Not much new, but it's a little clearer in
that all someone needs to do is attend the auction
and buy it and bring it home on a truck. At least I
doubt any "schools" will bid on this, if they do,
they'd have their hands full.
-dq
----------------------------------------------------
Douglas,
I'm supervising the removal of our MULTICS system here
in Halifax. John Macleod has indicated that you were
interested in the details.
On 13 Nov 2000 we will load the 5 CPU system along with
FNP's etc. onto a truck destin for Crown Assets disposal.
Crown Assets in turn offers the equipment to school projects
then publicly auctions it off. We were planning to cut the
serial cables to expedite the removal of several hundred
cables under our computer room floor.
The drives will be held locally for destruction (Security issues)
but replacments could be available from GENTRONICS.
If you have any questions let me know.
Dave Renshaw
MCOIN Support
Computer Room / NOC Supervisor
CS 02
Voice: 902 - 427-0550 X 2554 or 2540
Fax: 902 - 427-6626
E-mail: D.Renshaw(a)dnd.ca
On October 31, THETechnoid(a)home.com wrote:
> Last weekend I aquired a system/36 model 5360. Have not powered it as
> yet. The plug does not fit either of my dryer sockets but is marked
> 250vac, 20amp. Is this a three-phase machine? If so I think I am in
> trouble..... ;-)
Does the plug have three prongs or four?
-Dave McGuire
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:53:32 EST Mzthompson(a)aol.com writes:
> ----------------------------------------
> 3) Sigma Information Systems
>
> This card appears to be a disk controller. It has 4 WDC TR1865PL
> controller
> chips on it and there are 4 ten pin header connectors on the card
> edge.
>
> Numbers:
> Assy 400200
> CPX-6-0
This is probably a serial I/O card; the TR1865's are UARTS . . . .
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
I was sent this adress by somone at another comp users group..I hope you
can post it or pass it on..and I hope no one is offended
I have recently found, while helping my landlady in her warehouse in
Brooklyn, the following Timex Sinclair stuff. It all appears to be
new, or unused, though many of the boxes are beat up from being moved
around in a messy warehouse for years. Some of the boxes are very clean
though.
(TEN) Timex Sinclair 1500 computers..eight of them complete in (if
rather beat up) boxes, two out of box. All of them new..never used.
in original wrapping.
(TWELVE) Timex Sinclair 1000 computers, Mint, New in unopened boxes.
(THREE) Timex Sinclair 2068 Computers, new, out of box..without
accessories attached, although I have found some power supplies and
cables lying around loose.
(TWO) 16K Ram Modules #1016 one in box, one out.
Six plastic carrying cases for the 1500's (I think..the are little
molded cases that say timex sinclair on them)
some assorted TS software on cassette tapes, in original
wrapping..(will check titles if interested)
A whole lot of Timex 2040 printers, Alphacon 32 printers and cases of
printer paper for both. All mint, new in unopened boxes of twelve.
A reasonable offer...for anything
anyone interested?
thanks
Kevin Skvorak
kevskvk(a)inx.net
OK... so without taking the time to write a C program to do this for me,
I have this binary file that is a memory dump of 256KB saved on a 32-bit
machine.. I need to output four files, 64KB each, that are the component
bytes of that memory space. I know I can write a program to do this. Are
there any handy tools lying around so that I don't have to?
Thanks,
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
A good while back I hauled home what was the control box of an 8"
floppy duplicator. The information of the box:
Formaster Corporation
1983 Concourse Drive
San Jose, CA 95131
Model 4400
I hauled home only the control box thinking the case might come in
handy for some project. Earlier I opened it up and found a card
cage full of what I assumed at the time was Q-bus cards. Now with
the aid of the Field Guide maintained by Megan, I have identified
the main card as a Q-bus LSI-11/2 CPU 16-bit card.
I have no need for the cards and thought some might be of use to those
on the list. A couple of the cards were made by Formaster, so doubt
much demand for proprietary cards, but are included anyway.
Cards 1-4 are dual height and 5-7 are quad height.
So here is the list:
----------------------------------------
1) M7270 KD11-HA LSI-11/2 CPU 16-bit Q-bus
----------------------------------------
2) National Semicondutor Memory Systems card
Has 4 rows of 9 4116's, so 64k
Numbers on the card:
55110358-003C 980103858-001 REV L
----------------------------------------
3) Sigma Information Systems
This card appears to be a disk controller. It has 4 WDC TR1865PL controller
chips on it and there are 4 ten pin header connectors on the card edge.
Numbers:
Assy 400200
CPX-6-0
----------------------------------------
4) Formaster Corporation
I would say this is a proprietary card.
Only meaningful number 003-30026-01
It has a 50 pin header connector and a 16 pin header connector.
----------------------------------------
5) Acorn Systems memory card
Has 8 rows of 18 4164's, so 1 mb
Numbers:
Copyright 1981
30019-01
----------------------------------------
6) Acorn Interface and ROM card
I am guessing on this one. I say interface because has 4 50 pin
header connectors and 1 34 pin header connector. IIRC, the 34 pin
went to the front panel control board.
It also has 4 EPROMS (24 pin) with ID stickers on them (Formaster)
----------------------------------------
7) Formaster card
I would say this is a proprietary card.
Only meaningful number 003-29978-01
It has two 50 pin header connectors.
----------------------------------------
If you would like one of these cards, then here is the game plan.
1) Send an email reserving your card(s), first come first served.
2) I will not ask any specific amount for these cards. I will ask
that you send something to cover a little of my time and the trip to
the post office. I'll leave the amount up to you. Hint: Priority
Mail stamps make nice tokens.
3) All cards will be shipped by Priority Mail, one card to a box.
So send a $3.20 stamp for each card you want. Your card will be
properly packed and mailed back to you.
4) Any cards reserved and no stamp received by October 15th will
be 'unreserved' and tossed into the recycle pile.
Mike Thompson
8470 S US Hwy 41
Terre Haute, IN 47802-5198
--- Carlos Murillo <cem14(a)cornell.edu> wrote:
> At 09:37 PM 10/30/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >It sounds (at least to me) that he's writing 4 64Kbyte eproms that have to
> >exist in parallel on a 32-bit data bus for the total of 256Kbyte...
Yes. I'm sorry I wasn't more clear. I _did_ mention the 32-bitness of
the target machine.
> >byte1 byte2 byte3 byte4 byte5 byte6...
> >
> >And the four files would start out like this:
> >
> >File 1:
> >byte1 byte5 byte9 ...
> >
> >File 2:
> >byte2 byte6 byte10 ...
Right. If all I wanted was four 64KB files that concatenated into the
original, I could use split.
> and of course, you need to know the "endianness" of the machine
> where the dump was generated to see which file corresponds
> to which column-slice of the rom.
Also true. I'll be guessing because the ROM sockets are not numbered
on the board. :-( It's a VAXstation/MicroVAX 2000, if anyone happens
to know what the EPROM byte order is.
I got an EPROM splitter utility from Don Maslin (thanks, Don!) It
appears to be just what I was after.
Sorry for the confusion and wasted bandwidth.
-ethan
=====
Even though my old e-mail address is no longer going to
vanish, please note my new public address: erd(a)iname.com
The original webpage address is still going away. The
permanent home is: http://penguincentral.com/
See http://ohio.voyager.net/ for details.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
This is a semi-repeat request. Please excuse the bandwidth.
I'm playing with an old machine that has AT&T SysV UNIX Release 4, Ver 2.1.
There is no TCP/IP networking package that I can find. Can someone tell me
if TCP/IP is available, and from where it may be gotten? The post about the
VAX got me interested again...
Bill Layer
Sales Technician
<b.layer(a)vikingelectronics.com>
+----------------------------------+
Viking Electronics, Inc.
1531 Industrial St.
Hudson, WI. 54016 - U.S.A
715.386.8861 ext. 210
<http://www.vikingelectronics.com>
+----------------------------------+
"Telecom Solutions for the 21st Century"