>I owned a couple of Corvairs back in the sixties, but I don't recall
>either being equipped with Weber carburetors. Bein a GM product,
>Rochesters seem infinitely more likely.
I stand corrected...I gave up cars to get into computers, so it's been a
while. I think I still have the factory shop manual for the AMC Rebel at
home though, as well as enough Motor and Chiltons manuals to cover most
anything between 1954 and 1973.
Jeff
On Mar 12, 10:08, Mike wrote:
> From: Jim Battle <frustum(a)pacbell.net>
> > Do you know if you have the original, or the Sorcerer II?
> What's the difference between the two models?
Externally, practically nothing. Internally, the Sorcerer II has somewhat
different memory decoding, to accomodate 3 rows of 4116's instead of 2, and
they're all socketed. There's a DIP switch to select type and number of
banks, which was done by solder links on the original.
The video timing is also different, and it's easier to get a stable picture
at 50Hz on the Mk.II; one of the poles on the 4-way DIP switch controls
US/UK setting.
Some of the signals on the 50-way expansion interface are slightly
different. There's an MEMORY OFF input so an external device can switch
off the internal RAM. The RSET signal is derived slightly differently,
too.
The Mk.II has fixed the hardware bug in the RS232 (on the Mk.1, the gate
signal to switch from cassette to RS232 was wrongly applied so the RS232
was forced to the wrong logic level when the cassette was selected).
Some of the layout is a little different to accomadate the changes, the IC
number has changed of course, and a few parts of the circuit are done with
(parts of) different ICs.
They're still the same clock speed (2.106 MHz), and (apart from the
differences above) the same machine.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Here's a message I figured someone on the list might be able
to help with. I have a Dilog board in my MicroVAX II but don't know
enough about it to answer his question.
Jeff
>Sender: root(a)dd.vaz.tlt.ru
>Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:27:49 +0400
>From: TOSA <cav(a)b3339.dd.vaz.tlt.ru>
>Reply-To: cav(a)b3339.dd.vaz.tlt.ru
>X-Accept-Language: en
>To: jhellige(a)earthlink.net
>Subject: Dilog D0686 ESDI controller board
>
>WE HAVE Dilog D0686 ESDI controller board
>
> HOW LOAD FIRMWARE RESIDENT FORMATTER/DIAGNOSTICS UTILITY ?
>
>
>Thanks
--
Collector of Classic Microcomputers and Video Game Systems:
Home of the TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ File
http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
Here's what I have as far as OEM and IBM DOS versions, part numbers and
release dates when known:
MS-DOS 1.17H for Sanyo MBC-555
MS-DOS 1.25 Release J for Corona (700055)
MS-DOS 2.11 Release 1 for Corona (3/28/85)
MS-DOS 2.11 Release 4 for Corona (700500)
PC-DOS 1.10 (IBM, 5/7/82)
PC-DOS 2.00 (IBM, 3/8/83)
PC-DOS 2.10 (IBM, 10/20/83)
PC-DOS 3.10 (IBM, 3/7/85)
>On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Gene Buckle wrote:
>> The earliest I've seen is 1.25 for the Sumicom System 330, but the machine
>> wasn't 100% IBM compatible. It was a pretty neat machine though - I wish
>> I could remember what I did with it. :)
>
>MS-DOS 1.25 appears to be the same as PC-DOS 1.10
>
>Did ANY of the OEMS release MS-DOS 1.10?
>
>Which clones had single sided drives (and presumably preceded 1.10/1.25)?
>
>--
>Fred Cisin cisin(a)xenosoft.com
>XenoSoft http://www.xenosoft.com
>PO Box 1236 (510) 558-9366
>Berkeley, CA 94701-1236
>
If I recall the models correctly, all but the Monza had just two of the
Webbers, including the turbo-charged version. I believe the Monza was the
model with the 4 carbs and there were problems keeping them synced but it
was still a very nice engine. Sturdy, compact and lightweight. The gearbox
was a bit of an oddity though. If I had the space for one, I wouldn't mind
having another, as I had a '60 model.
Jeff
>Well, in the pre-Nader days, or shortly after his rise to prominence, I had a
>Corvair, and if my experience is any indication at all, they're not a major
>source of trouble.
>
>Dick
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jeff Hellige" <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
>To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 3:32 AM
>Subject: Re: Carter AFB.. he he!
>
>
>> > OT: From my street-racing days: the Javelin was not a bad little ride,
>> >properly set up, and I drove a few of them competitively. Holleys were
>> >always my first carb choice, Carters being 'okay' jugs, and then there
>> >Rochesters... yuck, poo!
>>
>> Then you had the Corvair's with thier 2-4 single barrel
>> Webbers...nice but tempermental to keep working right.
>>
>> Jeff
>> --
From: Chad Fernandez <fernande(a)internet1.net>
>That's true, but you aren't using the full capacity of the slot. I
Maybe, likely it's not a fast machine anyway.
>suppose if you already have an ISA card, and don't really want to spend
>anymore it's fine. I have a setup like that. I have a VLB slot with a
The other side is even if you want to spend there are few NOS boards
out there and fewer have much performance.
>ISA 1542B installed. I haven't actually gotten the computer up yet....
>still have some IRQ/DMA conflicts, I think.
Likely. Then again I set those things up in my sleep.
>SCSI is backwards compatible as long as you keep Single Ended and
>Differential separate.
Thanks for the info... I only work with them for a lving. ;)
>I would think any high end 486 class machine
>would benefit from wide scsi. Remember SCSI doesn't rely on the CPU
>like IDE does.
No. No. I retired an old P133 server that had a Wide SCSI card in it..
With the 33mhz FSB there was little hope of using all the performance
of the SCSI-W nor the really fast disk 7200rpm disk hooked to it. With
VLB or EISA your likely talking a 486DX4/133 maximum and they
are even slower. I know I have a 5x86/133 with VESA and the best
I see on that one is maybe 30mb/sec and that the burst rate not
an average.
>I actually have a pair of 8-bit SCSI cards, a Seagate, and an NCR. I
>have used the Seagate, unfortunately it didn't see more than 2xx of the
>300megs of my HD, after I repartitioned the HD on that controller. I
That and the best data rate will be 8-10mb/sec. ISA isn't fast.
Win95 if you have the OEM disk has drivers for some pretty old and
oddball stuff.
Maybe the point I'm making is just getting them going is often all that
can be asked. Trying to go for maximum smpoke is often not worth
it as recent hardware is cheap and far faster.
Allison
Rich,
I have a s***load of STD BUS boards and DOCS including 4 or 5 complete
systems with 8" disks. Alas, no hard drive based systems. If there's any
specific info, you're looking for, I'd be glad to look it up for you?
Unfortunately, I don't have a scanner or digital camera so bear with me :-(
The 7805 is a SBC that may or may not need any additional support cards.
They were mostly used in industrial or dedicated controllers and in fact
many are still in use today. Most of those boards (although not all) have
the processor, serial I/O, RAM, ROM, and timing circuitry all on one board.
Being controllers, there were a wide range of IO options available.
Everything from ADC/DAC converters, 16, 32, 48, 64 bit parallel interfaces,
OPTO 22 and relay drivers, temperature sensors, DISK controllers, etc...
Certainly the two additional cards that you have fit that category.
With all the IO options, they make great platforms for home automation
projects.
Most of the external cards have jumpers that can be used to configure the
address range (ports) for the cards. Most cards would work with any ports as
long as there wasn't an addressing conflict. With a range of 255 ports, the
system was very flexible.
I don't recall for sure but, I think STD standard only requires GND, +5,
+12, and -12 volts. If that's the case, you should be able to wire a regular
PC power supply to the backplane. A full rack which could be 20 or more
cards will certainly suck some power but the few cards that you have would
be well within the capacity of a small PS.
If you trace the lines from the 1488 and 1489 chips to the header connector,
you should be able with a little experimentation figure out how to connect a
dumb terminal. If not, I'll look it up for you.
As far as software, most of the controllers either had the application
burned in ROM or they would boot from an external disk (often CPM). The
BIOSs may be specific to a particular variant of the OS so, not all of them
will work together. IE: A microsys BIOS will probably not work with a DEC
version CPM. A prolog BIOS may not work with a microsys boot disk, etc...
Let me know what specific info you need.
See ya,
Steve
>From: "Cini, Richard" <RCini(a)congressfinancial.com>
>Reply-To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>To: "'ClassCompList'" <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>Subject: Looking for--data on ProLog SBCs
>Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:46:30 -0500
>
>Hello, all:
>
> I came across a small 4-slot cage with three STD BUS boards. One is
>an 8085-based SBC (#7805), an I/O board of some sort (#7604). The other is
>a
>PIO board from another manufacturer.
>
> Anyway, does anyone have any data on these boards? The Motorola Web
>site (new owners of ProLog) doesn't mention these boards (probably because
>of their age).
>
> Thanks.
>
>Rich
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>Well, you've had better luck that I've had with ADAPTEC PCI products. I just
>recently threw out a box of 18 or so 2940AU's none having been used for more
>than three months and all dead.
With that kind of failure rate, one has to wonder if there's some kind
of underlying problem other than the Adaptec boards.
Jeff
I'd have to go back and check the tech manuals to be sure but I believe the
main difference was the amount of memory on the main board. There were a
few other minor differences in the boards but nothing really major as I
recall.
I have a bunch of new manual scans I just need to finish cleaning up and
then I'll place them on my Exidy site. http://www.trailingedge.com/exidy/
Now if I could just find the S100 expansion box and some drives. *wishing
hard* :)
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Mike wrote:
> From: Jim Battle <frustum(a)pacbell.net>
>
> > Do you know if you have the original, or the Sorcerer II?
>
>
> What's the difference between the two models?
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
http://www.trailingedge.com
> > ever heard of any Linux billionaires?
>
>Yes, but that was last year when RHAT had a $20B market cap. Now they're
>just millionaires like you and me.
>
>Cheers,
>Doug
>
Oh... The Robin hoods of the software world and friends to software
engineers everywhere. Wonder how much their developers get paid... Oh that's
right, they don't get paid anything. The software is built by well intending
engineers and given to them for free... DOH!
Makes Bill Gates look like a prince. At least he pays his engineers.
Steve Robertson
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
I just finished posting the following to, alt.sys.pdp10, and I figure some
others here might be interested in the instructions on how setup the
emulator. Note, at this time ts10 works best under Linux. Work is being
done to get it working on other UNIX varients, but at this time Linux is
your best bet.
The following is a *Rough Draft*, but it should be enought to get a system
setup.
Zane
Installation of TOPS-10 v7.03
I'm guessing this might be of use to some people, and it can serve as a
starting point to a better document. I'm sure it's in need of corrections,
as I've doubts as to wether or not the system is coming up right.
The following procedure is mainly based on stuff Greg Satz, Parag Patel,
and Timothy Stark have posted. I'd figured out a lot of this, but this
looks a lot better than what I'd done :^)
Based on Mark Hittinger's comments about the RIB errors which I'd noticed
in my first install, I've used 1990 as the year in the following and it
seems to have not had any problem. I believe others have done this giving
the correct date without any problem though.
STEP 1.
First get the following tapes from http://pdp-10.trailing-edge.com
> BB-X138B-BB KS Bootable TOPS-10 v7.03 tape
> BB-X140B-SB TOPS-10 v7.03 Monitor sources
> BB-X128B-SB TOPS-10 v7.03 w/sources #1
> BB-FP63A-SB TOPS-10 v7.03 w/sources #2
> BB-FP64A-SB TOPS-10 v7.03 Tools w/sources
> BB-X130B-SB CUSP w/sources
You can also get the sources for the ts10 emulator here.
STEP 2.
Apply the following patch.
diff -c -r1.1 system.c
*** pdp10/system.c 2001/02/27 14:17:06 1.1
--- pdp10/system.c 2001/03/11 22:01:50
***************
*** 120,126 ****
}
text7[p] = 0;
! sprintf(text, "%012Lo ('%s' '%s')", data, text6, text7);
return text;
}
--- 120,126 ----
}
text7[p] = 0;
! sprintf(text, "%012qo ('%s' '%s')", data, text6, text7);
return text;
}
***************
*** 348,355 ****
// int reqBoot = FE_P0_MONITOR_PREBOOT;
// int reqBoot = FE_P0_DIAGNOSTIC_PREBOOT;
// int reqBoot = FE_P0_BOOTCHECK2_PREBOOT;
! uint8 inBuffer[0777 * 5];
! int36 inBlock[0777];
int36 idHom = util_PackedASCII6("HOM");
int36 dAddr36;
int36 data36;
--- 348,355 ----
// int reqBoot = FE_P0_MONITOR_PREBOOT;
// int reqBoot = FE_P0_DIAGNOSTIC_PREBOOT;
// int reqBoot = FE_P0_BOOTCHECK2_PREBOOT;
! uint8 inBuffer[01000 * 5];
! int36 inBlock[01000];
int36 idHom = util_PackedASCII6("HOM");
int36 dAddr36;
int36 data36;
STEP 3.
Startup the emulator.
[healyzh@ts10 ts10]$ ./ks10 -f ks10.cfg
Welcome to TS10 Emulator v0.7 (Alpha)
Unit uba: had been created.
Addr=776700 Mask=000077 IntBR=6 IntVec=254
Addr=772440 Mask=000037 IntBR=6 IntVec=224
Device RPA0: had been created.
Device RPA1: had been created.
Device MTA: had been created.
Device MTA0: had been created.
Device MTA1: had been created.
Device MTB: had been created.
Device MTB0: had been created.
Device MTB1: had been created.
Unit rha0 had been initialized.
Unit rpa0 had been initialized.
Unit rha1 had been initialized.
Unit mta had been initialized.
Unit mtb had been initialized.
Unit 0 dType RP06
Unit rpa0 had been attached with 'tops10_703.dsk' file.
Unit 0 dType TU45
Unit mta0 had been attached with 'tops10_703_ksbootable_bb-x138b-bb.tap' file.
TS10> boot mta0:
Booting MTA0...
Now running...
BOOTM V6(37)
BTM>/tm02
KS10 03-19-86
Why reload: new
Date: 11-mar-90
Time: 11:00
Startup option: destroy
% WARNING: All structures will be refreshed. All disk files
will be destroyed. All information on currently spinning packs
will be lost. Do not proceed unless you are positive that you
want to do this.
Proceed? (Y or <CR>)y
HOME blocks written on all units
RPA0 first BAT block consistency error
RPA0 second BAT block consistency error
Both BAT blocks are bad.
Do you want to initialize the BAT blocks on this unit?
y
Not normally done, are you sure?
y
Initializing BAT blocks
Start system? (Y or <CR>)y
Disk file structures:
DSKB:RPA0(ONC403)
To automatically log-in under [1,2] type "LOGIN"
KS10 11:00:10
. LOGIN
.ASSIGN MTA0: TAPE:
MTA000 assigned
.GET TAPE:BACKUP
Job setup
.SAVE BACKUP
BACKUP saved
.RUN BACKUP
/TAPE TAPE:
/SUPERSEDE ALWAYS
/INTERCHANGE
/FILES
/RESTORE SYS:=*.*
! SYSTEM EXE
"Done
/RESTORE DEC:=*.*
! SMFILE EXE
SMFILE HLP
SMFILE TXT
T10KL ULD
KSBOOT EXE
BOOTM RDI
T10KL RAM
"Done
/EXIT
[^E pressed]
.TS10> attach mta0: cuspmar86binsrc_1of2_bb-x128b-sb.tap
Unit 0 dType TU45
Unit mta0 had been attached with 'cuspmar86binsrc_1of2_bb-x128b-sb.tap' file.
TS10> continue
Running now...
.RUN BACKUP
/TAPE TAPE:
/INTERCHANGE
/SUPERSEDE ALWAYS
/PROTECTION 055
/FILES
/RESTORE DSKB:
[a lot of filenames print out]
$BKPEOT Reached EOT--mount new tape then type "GO"
[^E Pressed]
/TS10> attach mta0: cuspmar86binsrc_2of2_bb-fp63a-sb.tap
Unit 0 dType TU45
Unit mta0 had been attached with 'cuspmar86binsrc_2of2_bb-fp63a-sb.tap' file.
TS10> continue
Running now...
GO
[a lot more filenames print out]
"Done
[^E pressed]
.TS10> attach mta0: cuspmar86binsrc_1of2_bb-x128b-sb.tap
Unit 0 dType TU45
Unit mta0 had been attached with 'cuspmar86binsrc_1of2_bb-x128b-sb.tap' file.
TS10> continue
.RUN BACKUP
/TAPE TAPE:
/INTERCHANGE
/SUPERSEDE ALWAYS
/PROTECTION 055
/FILES
/@dskb:[10,7,build]cusps.rst
[You'll need to change to the second tape when it wants you to. When this
is done, make the disk bootable.]
.RUN DEC:SMFILE
DECSYSTEM 2020 DIAGNOSTICS FE-FILE PROGRAM
VERSION 2.5, TOPS-10, KS10, CPU#=5000
[FOR HELP TYPE "HELP"]
SMFILE>WRITE SETUP DSKB:[1,5\5\4]
SMFILE>WRITE RESET
SMFILE>READ DEC:T10KL.ULD
SMFILE>WRITE CRAM
SMFILE>WRITE BOOT DEC:KSBOOT.EXE
SMFILE>WRITE DONE
SMFILE>EXIT
EXIT
.R CREDIR
Create directory: ACT:
[^E pressed]
TS10> quit
STEP 4.
Now you should be ready to startup your system from disk.
[healyzh@ts10 ts10]$ ./ks10 -f ks10.cfg
Welcome to TS10 Emulator v0.7 (Alpha)
Unit uba: had been created.
Addr=776700 Mask=000077 IntBR=6 IntVec=254
Addr=772440 Mask=000037 IntBR=6 IntVec=224
Device RPA0: had been created.
Device RPA1: had been created.
Device MTA: had been created.
Device MTA0: had been created.
Device MTA1: had been created.
Device MTB: had been created.
Device MTB0: had been created.
Device MTB1: had been created.
Unit rha0 had been initialized.
Unit rpa0 had been initialized.
Unit rha1 had been initialized.
Unit mta had been initialized.
Unit mtb had been initialized.
Unit 0 dType RP06
Unit rpa0 had been attached with 'tops10_703.dsk' file.
Unit 0 dType TU45
Unit mta0 had been attached with 'tops10_703_ksbootable_bb-x138b-bb.tap' file.
TS10> boot rpa0:
Booting RPA0...
[Reading first HOM block...]
[Reading FE-FILE Page 0 at C 213 T 11 S 1]
[Reading Monitor Pre-boot at C 213 T 13 S 13]
Now running...
BOOT V3(47)
BOOT>
[Loading from DSKB:SYSTEM.EXE[1,4]]
KS10 03-19-86
Why reload: sched
Date: 11-mar-90
Time: 19:36
Startup option: go
[Rebuilding the system search list from the HOMe blocks]
[Rebuilding the active swapping list from the HOMe blocks]
[Rebuilding the system dump list from the HOMe blocks]
KS10 19:36:01 CTY system 5000
Connected to Node (0) Line # 42
.LOGIN 1,2
.R OPSER
[OPRPAF Processing auto command file]
?OPRALF LOOKUP failure 0
*
[CCPWFD Waiting for file daemon to start]
%%TTY STOMPER - Starting
*^C
.R LOGOUT
[LGTOUL Other users logged-in under [1,2]]
Job 2 User OPSER [1,2]
Logged-off CTY at 19:36:42 on 11-Mar-90
Runtime: 0:00:01, KCS:10, Connect time: 0:00:41
Disk Reads:126, Writes:0, Blocks saved:0
.LOGIN 1,2
Job 2 KS10 CTY
[LGNJSP Other jobs same PPN]
[LGNLAS Last access to [1,2] succeeded on 4-Mar-86:17:48:53]
19:36 11-Mar-90 Sunday
. SYSTAT
Status of KS10 at 19:49:53 on 11-Mar-90
Uptime 13:52, 117% Null time = 117% Idle + 0% Lost, 0% Overhead
12 Jobs in use out of 35. 12 logged in, 10 detached.
Job Who Line# What Size(P) State Run Time
1 [OPR] DET41 STOMPR 7+8 SL 1 01
2 [OPR] CTY SYSTAT 21+SPY RN 1
4 [OPR] DET41 ACTDAE 180+39 SL 4
5 [OPR] DET41 DAEMON 20+SPY SL 1
6 [OPR] DET41 FILDAE 17 HB 0
7 [OPR] DET41 QUASAR 108+39 SL 2
8 [OPR] DET41 PULSAR 65+39 HB 1
9 [OPR] DET41 CATLOG 30+39 HB 1
10 [OPR] DET41 ORION 96+39 SL 2
11 [OPR] 41 4 ^C 0
17 [OPR] DET41 BATCON 38+39 SL 1
29 [OPR] DET41 LPTSPL 58+39 HB 1
n means job runs in HPQ n
High Segments:
Program Device Owner High(P) Users
INITIA DSKB [SYS] 8 1
GLXLIB DSKB [SYS] 39 7
Swapping space used = 655/2000 = 33%
Virt. Core used = 691/2000 = 35%
84P Core left
Active swapping ratio = 21/775 = .02
Virt. Core saved by sharing = 234/(234+691) = 25%
Average job size =644/12 = 53.6P+281/12 = 23.4P Total=925/12 = 77.0P
No busy devices
System File Structures:
Name Free Mount
DSKB 213910 2
Total Free 213910
.
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
> This was one of the few missing things in my CBM collection until yesterday.
> The system first appeared dead, showing just a blank screen. But then it
> worked fine with any of my assorted game cartridges in the cartridge slot.
> To test the disk drive, I pulled out a cartridge-based spreadsheet which had
> load and save commands and the disk drive worked OK.
>
> The big surprise was when I put in the Simons Basic cartridge and this heavy
> old "portable" C64 came up with its normal opening screen "SX-64 Basic" etc
> and it loaded and ran a variety of programs from disk without a problem. But
> without a cartridge, or with a C64 Super Expander cartridge, just a blank
> screen.
Differential diagnosis of a blank screen on a Commodore (I'm a med student :-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the screen is *black* your first suspects, in order, are the PLA and then
the VIC-II. Also, as always, check the fuse.
I'm guessing that the blank screen you get is a *white* screen and possibly
a cyan border?
If cartridges work, as they do in yours, the problem is clearly one of the
ROMs. Since the disk drive is operational my first guess is the BASIC ROM,
which is fortunate for you because the Kernal ROM is unique to the SX :-)
I don't remember the number on it, though, but the SX Kernal should be
labelled 251104 with possibly a revision number (-04?). DON'T swap that one
out. The BASIC ROM is probably labelled 901226 but that's in the breadbox
systems. You can take that from any regular C64, and it should work fine.
If both ROMs are shot, all is not lost if you have an EPROM burner -- see this
wonderful archive:
http://www.funet.fi/pub/cbm/firmware/computers/c64/index.html
Just my $0.02! (You adjust for AUS$.)
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- Mickey Mouse wears a Spiro Agnew watch. ------------------------------------
Hmmm it doesn't sound normal. The SX model usually has problems with the
keyboard cable for the most part.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Phil Guerney
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 5:01 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Found a Commodore SX-64 but with a strange problem.
OK - So it might not be strange to those experts in Commodore hardware, so
I hope one of them reads this!
This was one of the few missing things in my CBM collection until yesterday.
The system first appeared dead, showing just a blank screen. But then it
worked fine with any of my assorted game cartridges in the cartridge slot.
Hi
Lucky guy a SX64,,,but it depends how much you paid...I was offered one for
$500CAN not too long ago....sure I am crazy...
I would check all chips on the boards and push on all of the socketed
ones...specially the ROMs....
By the way, I have been told that 5000 of these SX64 were made...does that
sound right or can someone confirm this?
Claude
----- Original Message -----
From: Phil Guerney <guerney(a)bigpond.com>
To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 6:00 AM
Subject: Found a Commodore SX-64 but with a strange problem.
> OK - So it might not be strange to those experts in Commodore hardware,
so
> I hope one of them reads this!
>
> This was one of the few missing things in my CBM collection until
yesterday.
> The system first appeared dead, showing just a blank screen. But then it
> worked fine with any of my assorted game cartridges in the cartridge slot.
> To test the disk drive, I pulled out a cartridge-based spreadsheet which
had
> load and save commands and the disk drive worked OK.
>
> The big surprise was when I put in the Simons Basic cartridge and this
heavy
> old "portable" C64 came up with its normal opening screen "SX-64 Basic"
etc
> and it loaded and ran a variety of programs from disk without a problem.
But
> without a cartridge, or with a C64 Super Expander cartridge, just a blank
> screen.
>
> Could it be a RAM chip that is faulty, with Simons Basic causing some
> relocation of memory that allowed the system to work? Unfortunately, the
> insides are not nearly as easy to get at compared to a standard C64.
>
> Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
> Phil
> (Brisbane, Australia)
>
>
From: Chad Fernandez <fernande(a)internet1.net>
>
>EISA won't go into an ISA system, either.
Yes, but most ISA-8 or and ISA-16 cards do fit EISA and VESA
bus machines as they generally provide ISA. I know that as I have a
boat load of antiques at work still running.
>I don't think any wide scsi
>ISA cards exist. Ebay, again, is the best source for an EISA scsi card.
Most wide SCSI drives work just fine with narrow. It's not as if the
machine is likely to be fast enough to really use wide SCSI
performance.
I generally use a ISA card from ADAPTEC as I have a 1542 and a 2906
(PCI) handy. That works in everything but the XT class boxen and MCA.
Allison
it's been quite some time since Ive picked up anything new. I've reached
critical mass and have had to pass by on machines which I already own except
for IBM PS/2s which I salvage for adaptor cards. anyway, just this past week,
I beat out several others and responded to an email about a free kaypro 10.
Its in great shape and will get the disks for it later hopefully. also got an
amstrad PC20 with second floppy drive and the special mouse, two mac quadra
630 and just today got an IBM 5364 which is a S/36 PC complete with the
display unit and funky cables. didnt get the keyboard though. Anyone have a
keyboard for an IBM 3196? Later, I discovered I left behind the host IBM PC
5150 that was there too so i returned for that. It even has the S36 boot
floppy still in the drive with dust on it. Can't do an IPL though, probably
because the S36 keyboard is missing. Not much info can be found on the 5364,
but will make a good addition to my IBM PC RT 6150.
DB Young Team OS/2
antique computer collection, hot rod pinto, and more at:
http://www.nothingtodo.org
From: Chad Fernandez <fernande(a)internet1.net>
>
>What is DRivX? Is that a Linux program or is it Windows or DOS?
Somthing I fond on a bbs about 9 years ago. Runs under dos
but doesnt actually use dos IO.
>Well yes, I know it won't be fast, but this is for an XT class system
>:-)
Expect less. ;)
>
>Cool, I get board with a perfectly working computer with nothing for it
>to do.
Some of them run the same apps I've used for years...sometimes for
profit. I do remember the not so boring years with them. Then I find
another and start over.
>I get frustrated with PCs as well. I hate it when stuff won't fit
>together, correctly, for instance. Unfortunetly, PCs are about all I
>have, until I pick up my PDP11/53 Monday or Tuesday :-)
Ah a late model Qbus machine.
The PDP-11 collection inculeds:
LSI-11/03
PDP-11/23
PDP-11/23B
PDP-11/73
Also a
PDT-11/130
Pro350
Pro380
An ex digit (DEC employee).
Allison
From: Eric J. Korpela <korpela(a)ellie.ssl.berkeley.edu>
>The classic-cmp question I have is at what point is a machine too slow
for
>SCSI, and how do things degrade as a machine gets slower. My Apple IIgs
Well expereince is that there is no too slow. I have SCSI on a 4mhz Z80
and it's decently fast compared to the MFM bridge controllers.
> But I assume there is a point at which things
>break if bytes don't move fast enough. Anyone know what that point is?
I've
No such point. I've run SCSI on said same z80 at 1mhz clock (testing
something else). SCSI does not have a minimum speed.
>been thinking about sticking an 8 bit SCSI card in my old Epson PC
which,
>because of brain damaged bus design can only pull 150 kB/s off of its
drives.
>Think it will work?
Yes. Likely it will be faster. Most of the "slow" older PCs were due to
the
limited buffers on the then current disk controllers. My Leading Edge D
running the 8088 (4.77mhz) ran much faster with the 8bit IDE adaptor
(acculogic) and a WD420mb IDE.
Allison
From: <many echos>
>> I have a 1969 AMC Javelin SST - 343 with a Carter AFB Carb - my
Likely it was a bug, aka Outlook virus that echoed an Email and the
attachment
was likely the bugs pass along.
Allison
From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
>>In general, I'd say that if you can find an alternative to ADAPTEC, at
least
>>with their PCI products, I'd use the alternative.
>
> I've never had any problems with the 2930U with CD-R's,
>scanners and hard disks. I've not used the 2940U2B enough to make a
>judgement yet. I'll likely be running both in the same machine soon
>though so that I don't have to try and mix the LVD and SCSI-2 stuff
>on the same bus. The 2930U would be just for legacy stuff I don't
>feel like upgrading anyway, such as my scanner.
Same here. the 2930 series (most are U but I have a u2B)is a good
board that seems to be unbreakable. I must have at least 6 in use
plus another here at home. Two of those were installed to support
Plextor CDwriters exclusively on systems with IDE disks. Mixing drive
interface types on SCSI busses is somthing I DO NOT do, two many
performance impacts.
Allison
Did someone preserve the pictures from VCF4? Curt's excellent retrospective
on AtariHistory.com doesn't work anymore :-/
http://www.atari-history.com/vcf4/vcf4.html
Clicking on the pictures (except vendor2.html) just gives 404s.
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- It is not enough to succeed. Others must fail. -- Gore Vidal ---------------
Well today I hit a small jackpot in that I got a almost complete HP
200LX palmtop PC with 1MB ram, leather carrying case, 3 manuals and
other papers, a set of four connectors all new and still wrapped in
plastic unopened. It's missing the cable for connecting it to a desktop
unit.
My other find is a complete Brainiac toy computer from the 1950's. This
unit is in it original box with all the parts for building your own
wooden computer that really works for doing math and other small task.
One of the light bulbs is broken and will need a replacement. The manual
is there and seems to be complete also but is showing it's age. Now if
I can just find a Geniac toy computer also ???
John Keys
From: Chad Fernandez <fernande(a)internet1.net>
>> >SCSI is backwards compatible as long as you keep Single Ended and
>> >Differential separate.
>>
>> Thanks for the info... I only work with them for a lving. ;)
>
>You work with Differential (not LVD) every day? What do you do?
Work with LVD too. MIS/magician/systems engineer for small company
40+ clients 5 servers. Not to mention various standalone dedicated
systems.
>How did you get 30mb/sec out of a 20mb/sec capable hardware setup?
Lean to the left and pray, the drive was 7200rpm baracuda running wide.
Would have gotten the rated 40 but the system was the limit. Testing was
under Linux and only to test hardware tuning. That system runs NT4.
>Narrow is 5, 8, or 10, ultra narrow is 20, wide is 20, ultra wide is 40
>and U2W is 80, and U3W (U160) is 160. What VLB card is wide? I don't
>think Adaptec has one, do they? I would like to get a VLB wide scsi
>card for the computer mentioned above.
Knock yourself out and good luck.
>What do you use for drive benchmark testing? I use Snooper, but I never
Norton, Snooper, DRivX and a few others.
Generally if I needs speed IDE does it well enough. SCSI is nice as I
can
hang a Raid disk farm on it.
>I need to rephrase that, the cards are 8-bit ISA, not 8-bit SCSI.
Still isn't going to be fast. ISA poops out at 8-10mhz.
>I am not trying to be rude, or make enemies, but why are you on a
>classic computer list?
Your rude. ;)
I am an original Altair owner and have a list of classics including
things like
PDP-8F, PDP-11, Northstar, KIM-1, ELF, TI99/4 and a raft of CP/M systems
based on S100. I can even say that most systems are operational with a
bunch of the oldies still cranking real work.
I've always pushed the hardware for just a bit more. PCs however tend to
raise my contempt as not all are quality hardware. I have PCs too but
few
are "classic" to me despite their age. I consider the PS/2 50Z and my
Leading Edge model D to be good examples of PC hardware. This is
not to say I'm not skilled at getting all of the performance a PC can
deliver.
>Sure I want my old computers to run, but I want it to be a fast as I can
get
>it, while maintaining reliably.
;) and thats something new?
Allison
From: Chad Fernandez <fernande(a)internet1.net>
>What I want it one of the later 1542 cards that isn't plug an play, but
>will handle drives over 1 gig. Both my 1542s have the earlier bios and
>won't go over 1 gig :-(
>
???? The 1542 in the domain server (an old P100) has a 2.7 gb drive in a
single
partition. You have a bios problem not an interface problem.
Allison
Fellow CLASSICCMP'ers,
As you may remember, my interests are shifting away from computing and
back to ham radio. As a result, I'm in the process of going through my
stuff and clearing out what I don't want to keep.
Part of my accumulation is a library of RSTS/E releases on 9-track tape.
The library covers a range of 7.2 to 9.0, and there are also numerous other
reels of miscellany, all on their own floorstand rack about four feet high.
I need to find a keeper, or librarian for this. It would be difficult to
ship, so I would like to find someone local (WA State, near Seattle) to
pick them up and give them a good home, and be ready to, say, copy a distro
if someone needed it.
Please contact me off-list if you're willing to be the "RSTS/E Archivist."
More posts coming up for more goodies.
Thanks.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
From: Bruce Lane <kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com>
> As you may remember, my interests are shifting away from computing and
>back to ham radio. As a result, I'm in the process of going through my
>stuff and clearing out what I don't want to keep.
Hi Hi, I"m working on getting my ticket too. I've had the commercial
ticket
for 31 years but it's time for the HAM. Radio is my second love.
Allison
(CC to classiccmp and port-vax)
I have a MicroVAX II, complete, in a four-foot mini-rack with a Fujitsu
'Super Eagle' disk drive and Cipher 880 tape drive. Everything worked the
last time I had it powered (about a year ago).
I want it to have a good home, but I also have some time and cleanup
effort invested in it, so I'd like to ask for $50.00 or best offer. LOCAL
PICKUP ONLY. It's too bulky for me to ship. (Kent, WA, southeast of Seattle).
Also available:
-- Two complete VCB02 video subsystems for the MicroVAX II/III. We're
talking boards, cables, cab kit, mice, KB's and monitors. MAKE ME AN OFFER.
-- At least one, possibly two, BA23 enclosures with hardware and panels
(hardware may require some digging to find).
-- Spare boards! MV-II CPU's, memory, etc. I know I have some Dilog
ESDI/Q-bus controllers, and there's probably some SMD boards in there as
well. Prices to be determined, probably best to make me an offer depending
on what you need and what I have.
-- Seagate 'Saber' SMD drives, 850MB. These are nice units in their own
trays, with power supply and LCD display diagnostics front panel. I have at
least two left, possibly three. $25.00 each.
-- PDP-11/73: I know I have at least one. Help me dig it out and we'll
see! ;-)
Lord only knows what else I've got in there... I have yet to go through
numerous crates of stuff, but my plan is to clear out pretty much anything
that I won't need to keep our server farm/Internet presence intact and
healthy. This means most of my DEC stuff.
Thanks in advance.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
On Mar 10, 15:18, Paul Williams wrote:
> Pete Turnbull wrote:
> > They're the VT1xx code ROMs. [...]
> Thank you Pete, that was swift and comprehensive! Is this list on the
> web anywhere, or do you just happen to keep schematics to hand?
Neither; it's from a chart I typed into one of my machines years ago. To
be honest, I can't remember where it came from. It may have been gleaned
>from assorted sources. Anyway, you just happed to be lucky that I was
sitting right beside the relevant machine and online to the time.
> Both boards have 23061-E2, 23032-E2, 23033-E2 and 23034-E2, and fifth
> ROM elsewhere labelled 23018-E2 (soldered, unfortunately).
I'm not sure what 23018-E2 is. Might be a character generator.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 10, 18:42, Brian Roth wrote:
> I am looking for a complete PDP8e. It doesn't have to win any beauty
> pagents but I would like it functional. I have many items to trade or a
> combination trade and money. I have a variety of workstations, servers,
> SUN, APPLE, COMPAQ , DAT drives,etc.
Well, that makes at least (!) two of us :-) I've been looking for one for
years :-(
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
it's been quite some time since Ive picked up anything new. I've reached
critical mass and have had to pass by on machines which I already own except
for IBM PS/2s which I salvage for adaptor cards. anyway, just this past week,
I beat out several others and responded to an email about a free kaypro 10.
Its in great shape and will get the disks for it later hopefully. also got an
amstrad PC20 with second floppy drive and the special mouse, two mac quadra
630 and just today got an IBM 5364 which is a S/36 PC complete with the
display unit and funky cables. didnt get the keyboard though. Later, I
discovered I should''ve gotten the host IBM PC 5150 that was there too since
it had a special card in it. I will try to go back and rescue that. Not much
info can be found on the 5364, but will make a good addition to my IBM PC RT
6150.
--
DB Young Team OS/2
old computers, hot rod pinto and more at:
www.nothingtodo.org
I have a mostly complete, untested rk611 controller available for sale or
trade. No reasonable offer refused. As a matter of fact, if you have a 5.25
inch DEC style filler panel or the jumpers that connect a 11/34 CPU to a
FPP, I'll trade you for that.
The controller includes M7900, M7901, M7902, M7903 modules (one module
missing) and the RK611 backplane.
Oh yea, buyer pays shipping.
Thanks,
Bill
I am looking for a complete PDP8e. It doesn't have to win any beauty
pagents but I would like it functional. I have many items to trade or a
combination trade and money. I have a variety of workstations, servers,
SUN, APPLE, COMPAQ , DAT drives,etc.
Please reply off list.
Brian.
On Mar 10, 12:41, Paul Williams wrote:
> There are four socketed chips together, labelled E40, E45, E52 and E56.
> Does anyone have the schematics and know what these contain?
They're the VT1xx code ROMs. In a VT100, they are contain ROMs with part
numbers 23031-E2, 23032-E2, 23033-E2, and (surprise, surprise) 23034-E2.
In a VT100-WC, -WK, or -AC, they contain 23095-E2, 23096-E2, 23139-E2,
23140-E2; the -WC and -WK variants also have an extra character ROM,
23094-E2. A VT125 or VT105 should have the same as a plain VT100 except
that the 23031-E2 is replaced with a 23061-E2.
> The fourth chip, E45, is labelled differently on the two boards
>
> Board 1. Signetics K8340 / CN7295N / 23-033E2-00 / (c) DEC 1978
> Board 2. [logo S] 8015E / C48008 / 23033E2
>
> I assume that 23033E2 is DEC's part number, but I can't find references
> for either 8340 or 8015. Is this another ROM?
Yes, 23 means a mask ROM, the next three digits are the ROM code number,
and the E2 is the size (2K in this case; E3 is 4K, E4 is 8K, etc). 8340
and 8015 are probably the date of manufacture.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 10, 14:16, Lawrence LeMay wrote:
Yep, those rows are in my table too. Now I know where I got it :-)
I've also got a table of ROMs for the AVO board. Is that from the same
place? Any more?
To save Paul some retyping, if he wants to put it on a web site, here's the
file:
VT100 Series ROMS
=================
Terminal Board
--------------
ROM0 ROM1 ROM2 ROM3 Chargen
VT100 031 032 033 034 -
or 061 - - - -
VT100-WC,-WK 095 096 139 140 094
VT100,VT1xx-AC 095 096 139 140 -
VT132 095 096 097 098 -
or 180 181 182 183 -
VT125, VT105 061 032 033 034 -
Advanced Video Option Board
---------------------------
A B C D
VT100 - - - -
VT100-WA,-WB 069 - - -
VT100-WC,-WK 152 - - -
VT1xx-AC 284 185 - -
or 186 187 - -
VT132 099 100 - -
or 236 237 238 239
or 224 225 226 227
VT125,VT105 - - - -
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 10, 14:16, Lawrence LeMay wrote:
> And the VT132 has either 23095E2, 23096E2, 29097E2, 29098E2, OR
> 23180E2, 23181E2, 23183E2, 23183E2
>
> Now you have all the information from Table 5-7, from page 5-68 of
> the VT100 Series Video Terminal Technical Manual ;)
Yep, those rows are in my table too. Now I know where I got it :-)
I've also got a table of ROMs for the AVO board. Is that from the same
place? Any more?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
> Has anyone used one of these before? Granted the speed is
>going to be limited by going through the parallel port, but it's an
>easier solution than finding and installing an ISA/EISA/MCA SCSI card
>for occasional use of a SCSI CD-ROM or some such item.
> Jeff
It will likely not be fast enough for a CDwriter. The only SCSI
interface
thats hard to find is the MCA as ISA/EISA is the same board and
generally available cheap (under 60$) if you dont need a bootable model.
Allison
From: Mark Gregory <gregorym(a)cadvision.com>
>I seem to recall Stephen Coonts mentioning the A-6's nav system
computers in
>"Flight of the Intruder". IIRC, there's a passage where the navigator
resets
>the computer, and its mentioned that it uses rotating drum memory. That
Your memory is correct.
Also trying to "reset" it harder to unjam the drum.
>would make sense for early versions of the A-6, since they were designed
in
>the late 1950's. Because of the A-6's extraordinarily long service life,
it
>wouldn't surprise me if it hadn't been fitted with every generation of
>computer technology from drums to microchips during its many avionics
>overhauls.
At least 3 possibly 4 generations with the "Wild Weasels" EA-6s being in
the
more recent group with ARM, ECM and high altitude radar tracking
platform.
Early aircraft computers (pre 1980 as they generally had a 2-10 year lead
over commercial) would be an area of interest here.
Allison
>Cheers,
>Mark.
>
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 12:56:44 -0800 (PST) Ethan Dicks
<ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com> writes:
> --- Tony Eros <tony.eros(a)machm.org> wrote:
> > Yeah, let's get rid of all those stupid non-metric
> > measurements. Especially those pesky units of time. I mean, what
> idiot
> > came up with "seconds", "minutes" and "hours", anyway? The
> "hours" even
> > repeat twice every "day" -- how stupid is that!
>
> Hopefully this is meant humorously. The second _is_ a metric unit
> of time, even though minutes/hours/etc are not reckoned in decimal
> intervals.
Actually, this idea of 'metric' time is nothing new. There exists
watches from the late 18th and early 19th centuries, whose dials read
*ten* hours, divided up into 100 minutes of 100 seconds each.
Most of these came from France, as a government decree made them
necessary, as per this quote from:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~rkeulen/watch/metric.html
"During the Revolution, the French tried to reenforce the 12 months/
360 days - year, using a decimal timescale, adding 5 days of festivities
at the end of the year. A day consisted of 10 hours of 100 minutes.
Minutes were devided in 100 seconds. 10 days made a "week", called a
"dekade". There were 30 days in a month. The republican calendar was
not a succes and lasted only from 1793 till 1805."
It appears that 'metric' timekeepers (and timekeeping) were unpopular
even in their own day. (Aren't you glad?)
OB Classic (to keep this even remotely n topic):
The Jacquard Loom was developed at the end of this period, the worlds
first programable piece of manufacturing equipment. (Perhaps those
9-day work-dekades were beginning to piss him off . . . .).
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, March 09, 2001 8:12 PM
Subject: Re: Now we are into cars and planes
>At 07:09 PM 3/9/01 -0500, Alison wrote:
>>From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
>>>>
>>>>The A6 intruders during the Veitnam era were serial based on
>>>>a fixed disk. It was part of the nav and targeting system and
>>>>not fly by wire.
>>>>
>>>>Allison
>>>
>>> I recently had a memory unit for an EA-6. It used core memory. It
>>was
>>>SN 001 and the ICs dated from 1966 if I remember right. Of course, there
>>>was probably more than memory in the EA-6. I sold the unit but I can dig
>>>out the description and pictures if anyone's interested.
>>
>>
>>EA-6 is later and used updated hardware.
>
> It's hard to think of core memory as "updated" hardware. :-) I hate to
>imagine what an *earlier* fixed disk looked like!
>
> Joe
>
I seem to recall Stephen Coonts mentioning the A-6's nav system computers in
"Flight of the Intruder". IIRC, there's a passage where the navigator resets
the computer, and its mentioned that it uses rotating drum memory. That
would make sense for early versions of the A-6, since they were designed in
the late 1950's. Because of the A-6's extraordinarily long service life, it
wouldn't surprise me if it hadn't been fitted with every generation of
computer technology from drums to microchips during its many avionics
overhauls.
Cheers,
Mark.
While the printer isn't 10 yrs old it is semi-obsolete by industry standards
for commercial machines. I have obtained a Dataproducts Typhoon 20 in great
condition and need documentation for it and Dataproducts has none on their
site. They do have software but the Win98SE drivers are actually better.
The printer is essentially the same as a Xerox 4520/4520mp or a Compaq
PageMarq 20 with differences being mostly in the electronics (logic board).
Otherwise all three printers are same-o, same-o.
If anyone has a manual they don't need and want to sell/trade for or know of
an electronic copy somewhere I could download it would be appreciated.
I've just received some VT100 boards and I have several questions.
I have a VT125 case containing monitor and PSU, but with an empty card
cage. Can I just plug in a board and fire it up? (Assuming that the PSU
is OK, since I wouldn't know how to load it in order to test it.)
There are four socketed chips together, labelled E40, E45, E52 and E56.
Does anyone have the schematics and know what these contain? Three of
these (E40, E52 and E56) contain AM9218 2Kx8 ROMs, but I can't find a
pinout of this. Is there a pin-compatible EPROM (2716?) that I could set
my PROM programmer to, in order to upload these?
The fourth chip, E45, is labelled differently on the two boards
Board 1. Signetics K8340 / CN7295N / 23-033E2-00 / (c) DEC 1978
Board 2. [logo S] 8015E / C48008 / 23033E2
I assume that 23033E2 is DEC's part number, but I can't find references
for either 8340 or 8015. Is this another ROM?
Paul
Since I've got myself a pretty little EPROM burner, and seem to have a lot of
ROMs and ROM sockets around, I thought that it should be worthwhile to create
a central repository for all those ROMs which are so difficult to get
nowadays. Is this a good idea, or has somebody already done it? I don't care
much about copyrights, though I wouldn't want to go against the wishes of the
actual owners of the software contained. Any thoughts?
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6.
VIRGO (Aug 23 - Sept 22)
You are the logical type and hate disorder. This nitpicking is
sickening to your friends. You are cold and unemotional and
sometimes fall asleep while making love. Virgos make good bus
drivers.
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
>>
>>The A6 intruders during the Veitnam era were serial based on
>>a fixed disk. It was part of the nav and targeting system and
>>not fly by wire.
>>
>>Allison
>
> I recently had a memory unit for an EA-6. It used core memory. It
was
>SN 001 and the ICs dated from 1966 if I remember right. Of course, there
>was probably more than memory in the EA-6. I sold the unit but I can dig
>out the description and pictures if anyone's interested.
EA-6 is later and used updated hardware.
> I've got a Lantirn targeting computer right now but I haven't opened
it
>up yet to see what's inside. I've also got a largeish aircraft
navigation
>computer but I don't know what it came out of and I haven't opened it up
>yet either.
Interesting, some were generally known machines majorly repackaged
or standard hardware special boxes.
Allison
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net>
>>EA-6 is later and used updated hardware.
>
> It's hard to think of core memory as "updated" hardware. :-) I hate
to
>imagine what an *earlier* fixed disk looked like!
>
It's my understanding that the first version was of the same general
design as Minuteman-1 missle computer and similar transistor
machines of the early 60s. Even the Accumulator was a "track"
on the multi headed disk.
Allison
<< Is it fully populated or are there some empty places. It
came in two versions. 40 and 80 column. The 40 was missing a
number of chips. If it is a real 80 column, I'm looking for one.
I already have two 40 column ones. I also have schematics for
these on blue print paper. I could make copies for anyone
that needed them.
Dwight
PS It is composite video. You just need the screen to make
a full keyboard/monitor.
>>
That is just too cool! I have to have one.... What kind of terminals are they, and does anyone have a spare they would like to get rid of?
-Linc.
In a message dated Fri, 9 Mar 2001 8:03:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, Claude <claudew(a)videotron.ca> writes:
<< Hi
Well for me too things have been pretty slow my collection is growing
and it is now tougher and tougher to find new stuff...
Oh yes, I am still hunting for these things : Next box
Claude
--
The Canuck Computer Collector
http://computer_collector.tripod.com
>>
Claude,
I have a friend that has *PILES* of NeXT boxen, their monitors and printers as well. He wishes to sell them very reasonably. The only caveat is he has no cables for them... Anyhow you (or anyone else looking for one) can contact Dave McGuire by email at mcguire(a)neurotica.com
Please do me a favor and tell him that Linc sent ya. BTW, for those of you who like to trade equipment, he likes older DEC equipment.
-Linc.
P.S. If any of you have any NeXT cables, please let me know - I am looking for a mono cable (DB15?) and can't find any anywhere!
Hi
Well for me too things have been pretty slow my collection is growing
and it is now tougher and tougher to find new stuff...
I found an older terminal in a keyboard from a company called:
KTM-3/80 from Synertek Systems Corporation
Production date : 3/24/81
Looks like a self-contained terminal in a keyboard with a composite
video out (or rf?). Very odd looking for me and I dont recall seeing a
lot of these things way back. I have not tested it yet but if anybody is
interested, Ill take a picture and post the link here.
The thing has a flat cable with a db25 sticking out from it. Its just
slightly thicker than an "ordinary" keyboard...
On/Off switch, P.S. jack, RCA jack and someone (thanks!) stuck a piece
of paper that gives the DIP SW settings for the baud rate etc under the
keyboard...
Ill check the P.S. requirements and test the thing eventually.
If anybody collects terminals, I might be tempted to trade or giveaway
this thing...After all original collecting was supposed to be Apple
computers only...now includes all micros 197x-198x...I dont wanna start
collecting terminals...
Oh yes, I am still hunting for these things : Next box, LC575 or Color
Classic board (my color classic is missing one), anything micros
197x-198x...Always interested in trades (I dont sell stuff) see my
site...
Claude
--
The Canuck Computer Collector
http://computer_collector.tripod.com