Saw this on comp.sys.dec, thought to pass it on:
From: <tsm(a)palindrome.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms,comp.sys.dec
Subject: Free MicroVAX II, Terminals in Portland, OR
-- Please disregard this message if you are not in the Portland, Oregon
area. --
I have a MicroVAX II, which I hope to find a new owner for. It is in the
H9642 cabinet, which is about 26"x40"x36" (WxHxD), and weighs a couple of
hundred pounds. It is not fully decked out, but contains the disk, and a
complete system's worth of boards (CPU, memory, disk controller, network,
etc.). It'll take a bit of work to put back together.
I also have two LA-120's (terminal-printers), with some spare ribbons, huge
box of paper, and a box of spare parts.
I can also throw in a Wyse monitor which will work with the system. I also
have a couple of boxes full of VMS and VAX documentation to the interested
party. A couple of boxes of misc. VAX hardware also.
All of this stuff is FREE, but preference given to whoever is willing to
take the most stuff. Items located in North Portland (Rose Quarter & St.
Johns area). I will NOT ship any of this stuff (so I apologize for the
worldwide distribution of the message); taker must arrange for
transportation of equipment. You will need a van or pickup truck to haul
this stuff.
Feel free to e-mail me back, or call me at 503-240-4922 if interested.
Thanks,
Terry Murphy
>The other thing to consider is: Will OS X run at a useful speed on her
>computer? Does the new versions of Photoshop require more RAM and / or
>computing power?
I just finished an install of OS X on a Beige G3/300 with 192MB RAM and
it seems to run fine. I'm doing the initial testing on the G3/300 before
installing it on the newer G4's we have. I installed it over the top of a
current OS 8.6 setup and in fact, this email is being sent from Outlook
running on 'Classic' under OS X. The install went painlessly, the speed is
acceptable and it was quite simple getting the network settings put back to
where everything worked. OS X ships with 3 CD's, one of which is OS 9.1,
which I had to upgrade 8.6 to prior to installing OS X. 9.1 is what it
actually uses to run 'Classic' applications.
BTW, for those familiar with NeXTstep, it's easy to see the lineage
behind OS X. They even kept the spinning multicolored pinwheel while the
system is loading.
Jeff
> DE-9, DA-15, DB-25, DC-37, DD-50, DE-15, DA-26, DB-44, DC-62, DE-78,
Well, so much for tirades. :) Can't even keep them straight myself.
That should be DD-78.
Eric
Everything past the early PowerMacs is PCI, not NuBus.
I'm going to agree that there's no compelling reason for her to upgrade to
OSX. Hell, Adobe and other major vendors aren't going to have their apps
carbonized for a few months yet. OSX is not essential even on the newest G4
until there's applications that can take advantage of its next-gen
capabilities (i.e. multithreading for multiprocessing, integrated G4
acceleration). If she were to upgrade to OSX she'd still be running the
majority of her stuff in a "Classic" environment window. If she decides
she's absolutely got to keep using this localtalk printer after LocalTalk
support is dropped, perhaps she could use a LocalTalk to EtherNet adapter.
Assuming the software will support such a thing.
Once ATM and Photoshop and Freehand and Premiere and InDesign are
OSX-native, look out!
Now - who wants to help me track down a 2 to 9 gig internal SCSI harddrive
for my Quadra 700 running NetBSD that I use as my BIND and Sendmail server?
-carl
"Russ Blakeman"
<rhblake(a)bigfoot.com> To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent by: cc:
owner-classiccmp@clas Subject: RE: Apple LWPro parallel port?
siccmp.org
03/29/01 11:44 AM
Please respond to
classiccmp
I've seen NuBus centronics adapters on ebay that allow you to have a
standard 25 pin centronics compatible parallel port - you might look around
for one. I'm not sure if your machine has NuBus or PCI but I'm guessing
that it's NuBus. Why is she worried about upgrading if the OS doens't suit
her needs?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Marion Bates
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 10:32 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: OT: Apple LWPro parallel port?
Hi all,
My mom has the following setup:
- Beige G3 minitower
- Apple LaserWriter Pro 600
- OS 9.1
The printer and Mac are connected via LocalTalk. (This printer requires
AppleTalk.)
She is afraid that the next upgrade (OS X) will make the printer
unuseable, since Apple is phasing out LocalTalk (this Mac is the last
model that still comes with a damn serial port).
The printer has no Ethernet capability, but it does have a parallel port
in addition to the LocalTalk port.
The questions are: Is there any sort of hardware/software conversion kit
that would allow the Mac to use that parallel port if LocalTalk becomes
unavailable in the future? Does anyone have any experience with running OS
X and making it play nice with legacy hardware like this? Also, do they
still make LocalTalk PCI cards, and if so, is there any chance that the
drivers would work under OS X? This printer still works like new and she's
not ready to just chuck it and buy a new one.
Sigh. Old hardware doesn't wear out fast enough to keep pace with new
software. ;)
TIA,
-- Marion "Still using a PowerComputing100 with a G3 upgrade card and OS
7.6.1 so I can run my $1200 1993 Apple Color OneScanner which is not as
good as today's lamest $79 USB scanner but it still works goddammit" Bates
>I've seen NuBus centronics adapters on ebay that allow you to have a
standard 25 pin centronics
>compatible >parallel port - you might look around for one. I'm not sure if
your machine has NuBus or
>PCI but I'm guessing >that it's NuBus. Why is she worried about upgrading
if the OS doens't suit her
>needs?
The Beige G3 is a PCI based tower. It was the first G3 powered
desktop/tower that Apple sold and is generally had in speeds between 233 and
300 mhz.
Jeff
On Mar 29, 6:20, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> What is a DD50? I'm thinking of the connector used on PS/2s, which looks
like
> a small Centronics connector.
DD50 is a large D-connector, twice as big as a DB25 :-)
"A small Centronics" connector could be lots of things, but if you mean a
half-pitch connector with clips, that's a half-density 50-pin D-connector
(even though it doesn't look quite like a miniaturised D-connector), and is
the device recommended in the SCSI-2 standard.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 29, 0:31, Tony Duell wrote:
> Looking at Poole&Molloy (Radio and Television Servicing -- annual volumes
> that cover the major TVs and radios for each year), it's amazing how many
> sets from nominally different manufactures contain the same chassis...
I know. Sometimes there only seem to be about two or three "current"
models (plus variations for tube size).
> The result was that my parents ordered the failed servoid out of the
> house, returned the rented TV, and I've been landed with repair jobs here
> ever since.
LOL! Serves you right!
> > 405-line 14" 'portable'.
> Converting a 405 line set to a (presumably 625 line) monitor is not the
> most trivial job, I wouldn't have thought. Don't tell me it was a live
> chassis set as well....
No, thankfully it wasn't. I don't recall having to do much to change the
frequencies, though.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
>Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:34:58 +0100 (BST)
>From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
>Subject: Re: ZX-TEAM meeting/TS1000 least expandable???
>
>> I thought that since the ZX80's memory couldn't be expanded, there were
no
>> expansion port either.
>
>I am sure I've seen Sinclair adverts for a 16K RAM pack for the ZX80. And
>maybe a smaller RAM pack (3K? 4K?) as well. I always assumed the
>connector was the same, because things like the ZX printer would work on
>the ZX80 if you fitted the later ROM, I think.
My ZX80 came with a ZX81 16K RAM pack and it works fine; ISTR physical
differences aside the only real difference between the 80 and 81 was the ROM
anyway, so by the time you'd bunged a 81 ROM in your 80 you ended up with an
81! The ROM even came with a 81 keyboard, overlay or real keyboard; can't
remember which.
The Jupiter Ace had a 4K RAM pack as well as a 16K one, and if anyone has a
spare Ace (UK) or Ace 4000 (US) I'd be happy to take it off them :o)
--
Adrian Graham MCSE/ASE/MCP
C CAT Limited
Gubbins: http://www.ccat.co.uk (work)
<http://www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk> (home)
<http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk> (The Online Computer Museum, now W3C
compliant!)
0/0
>Hi all,
>
>My mom has the following setup:
>
>- Beige G3 minitower
>- Apple LaserWriter Pro 600
>- OS 9.1
>
>The printer and Mac are connected via LocalTalk. (This printer requires
>AppleTalk.)
>
>She is afraid that the next upgrade (OS X) will make the printer unuseable,
>since Apple is phasing out LocalTalk (this Mac is the last model that still
>comes with a damn serial port).
My first suggestion would be that, unless she has a specific reason for
upgrading to OS X, she should stay with 9.1. Like all Version 1.0 items, OS
X is going to need a few things worked out and will likely be adopted
immediately by: a) developers, b) hard core geeks that just have to have the
latest and greatest thing released, c) people that don't know any better and
give in to some form or another of pressure to upgrade. She'd be better off
waiting for it to mature a little bit, especially if she is just a casual
user.
As for the serial ports, since the Beige G3 is a supported machine, I
would thing that it's serial ports would be supported as well. The only G3
or newer system not supported by OS X is the original G3 Powerbook.
Jeff
>That's interesting, there was an Appletalk hardware/software solution for the
>Amiga which was called... Doubletalk. It existed both as an external box for
>A500s and a Zorro card for the big boxes.
There was also the Emplant Deluxe with it's Localtalk ports, which I
used to connect my A4000 up to various Mac's. I never ran it as the Emplant
emulator but as a hardware extension of Shapeshifter's emulation.
Jeff
IBM mainframes, Hitachi mainframes, and Amdahl mainframes.. They sound like
they're 3380-equivalent, at least the Amdahls do. I wish they were closer,
or I'd buy 'em, could use more storage.
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
On Mar 29, 6:39, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> I see. I really must create a lot of small networks now, so that I may
> saturate all those ports.
Well, they would really all be the same network -- they'd be all one
collision domain (any packet or collision appearing on one port would be
seen on all the others. That's what a repeater does).
> What management would be involved with a repeater? All other hubs and
> repeaters I've used have been entirely automatic.
Partitioning segments deliberately, eg to lock out a faulty host -- maybe
one that's jabbering, or responding to things it shouldn't -- or an
intruder. Monitoring traffic levels (counting packets, octets, collisions,
etc). Monitoring traffic types (unicast packets, multicast packets,
broadcast packets). Keeping a list of MAC addresses seen. Since all this
is usually done by talking to the repeater (or whatever) over the network,
the repeater itself has to have an IP address, and so there are ways to set
that up (setting it by hand, or telling it to use bootp/dhcp) or upgrade
the firmware, or set passwords for read/write operations.
> I'd think so too, but I heard on Usenet that old repeaters (the kind
which
> actually call themselves repeaters =) could slow down modern networks.
Don't
> ask me how, though.
I don't see why, if you're talking about repeaters. Old switches might
well be slow, since they work on a store-and-forward basis. A repeater
("hub") works on the bit level; a switch works at the packet level and
looks at the type and addressing of each packet before passing it on.
Newer switches use ASICs to do this in hardware at wire speed, older ones
use more conventional processing (or a combination).
> >> What does partitioning actually entail?
>
> >See above. Some more modern 3Com hubs also have the capability to split
> >the unit into segments (eg, the SuperStack II PS 40 hubs and others can
> >have 4 segments) but assigning ports to different segments isn't usually
> >called partitioning.
>
> IOW it's just a glorified OFF switch. =)
Partitioning, is, yes. Segmenting isn't, it's just a way of making one
big(ish) hub do the job of a few smaller ones.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Yes, you can do that and the perfomance is very good on the
K2-350 box here at work. I use teh 3.5" loaded one to install windows and apps as it's faster than 4x CDrom and since some systems here dont have cdrom at all it really beats floppies
or sucking it down the 10mbs eitherpipe.
I've never tried to boot one directly but I have used one as
C: via floppy boot for W95.
Allison
------Original Message------
From: "Richard Erlacher" <edick(a)idcomm.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Sent: March 29, 2001 4:30:02 AM GMT
Subject: Re: ide harddrive
IF you have a DLL to support EPP under W9x, you can certainly do that. I've not
yet found one that comes with enough pre-sale doc to verify that it's up to that
kind of performance. There are a few PCI parallel port boards that claim to
have the speed, however. I tabled my S-100 bus probe a year or more ago for the
simple reason that the ports on the motherboards I was considering were not fast
enough. The PCI ones may breathe new life into the project.
The datasheet for the SMC34C60 turned up immediately on a search via GOOGLE.COM.
There's an IP product that pops up too, perhaps worth a look. Be careful not to
mix up the EPP and ECP functions on the SMC part! The two are TOTALLY
different!
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "ajp166" <ajp166(a)bellatlantic.net>
To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: ide harddrive
> From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>
> >I'd be VERY interested in seeing that schematic, Tony! I've no doubt
> that it can be done, but I wonder how fast it will be.
>
> The commercial ones are at least several mb/sec using drives designed for
> DMA33. Only took a minute or less to transfer a set of 28 .CAB files
> (w95).
>
> The device driver runs as a SCSI device under W9x or NT4.
>
Undoubtedly that's a driver for the device under Windows, and not a generic port
driver. Too bad ...
>
> Allison
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Tony Duell" <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> >To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 11:01 AM
> >Subject: Re: ide harddrive
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> > Evening folks, I am looking for a circuit using the parallel port on
> a
> >> > pc to Ide interface, does anyone have a schematic for one?
> >>
> >> Somewhere I have an data sheet for a chip to convert a parallel port
> into
> >> an ISA slot. No, I don't mean a chip for adding a printer port to the
> ISA
> >> bus (like the 82C11 does), I mean a chip that connects to a parallel
> port
> >> (either 'original' or one of the enhanced bidirectional ports), and to
> >> some DRAM, and which allows you to connect anything that you'd
> normally
> >> connect to ISA on the other side of it. It allows you to read/write
> any
> >> port or memory location from the parallel port side, it allows the ISA
> >> device to do DMA into the memory hung off the chip (which can then be
> >> read/written from the parellel port), and so on.
> >>
> >> I think it was made by SMC, but don't quote me on that.
> >>
> >> It looked like a fun device to work with, but I don't know where on
> earth
> >> you'd find one.
> >>
> >> If anyone is interested, I will try and find the data sheet and post
> the
> >> number of the device.
> >>
> >> -tony
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:36:07 +0100 (BST)
> From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Subject: Re: ZX80/81 expansion
>
> > My ZX80 came with a ZX81 16K RAM pack and it works fine;
> ISTR physical
> > differences aside the only real difference between the 80
> and 81 was the ROM
>
> I thought the ZX81 hardware provided some kind of interrupt
> to the Z80 to
> allow for 'simultaneous' processing and display, and that you
> couldn't
> get this on the ZX80 simply by dropping in the new ROM. There were
> various circuits (a couple of TTL chips IIRC) to add this
> feature to the
> ZX80, though.
Yah, the ZX80 couldn't think and talk at the same time so it blanked the
screen while it was processing! In the ZX81 this was known as FAST mode,
with the slower SLOW mode being able to do both. However, this still meant
that in SLOW mode the machine was 4 times slower than in FAST! Probably
sometime tonight I'll upload the Your Computer reviews of the ZX81, Jupiter
Ace and a couple of others for your reading pleasure, unless you've already
got them round somewhere. Oh, hang on, you're text only aren't you?
> Keyboard overlay I think. The keyboards were somewhat different
> physically, weren't they -- the ZX80 used contacts on the
> main PCB, the
> ZX81 had a separate membrane keyboard linked up with tapewire.
<thinks>. Yep. Looking at the pic on the museum site the keyboard is part of
the main PCB, whereas on the ZX81 it was separate. I still think its funny
to look at the design for the ZX80 and compare it with the heath-robinson
nature of the Issue 1 Spectrum :o)
> I have an Ace, but it's not 'spare' if you see what I mean.
Bugger :)
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:21:07 +0000
> From: jpero(a)sympatico.ca
> Subject: Re: MacOS on CD-ROM? (was Re: Mac SE/30)
>
> The biggest difference this Basilisk II is freeware where other
> emulators you talked about ( saw them ) are payware.
I think I need to get my paws on that then......
--
Adrian Graham MCSE/ASE/MCP
C CAT Limited
Gubbins: http://www.ccat.co.uk (work)
<http://www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk> (home)
<http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk> (The Online Computer Museum)
0/0
On Mar 28, 22:50, Paul Braun wrote:
> But if you REALLY want to do it right, you wind your own coil on a
> shellacked oatmeal box.....or, a shellacked salt box.
>
> All of mine used a germanium diode and a prewound coil, so there.
> I'll shut up now.
:-)
Everyone (at least, everyone in the UK) knows you wind a hundred turns[1]
or so of 24swg DCC (double cotton covered) copper wire (actually, I used
enamelled copper) on a toilet roll centre, to make a coil about 2" long.
I recall one maths teacher using a toilet roll centre for some
demonstration in a maths class (nothing to do with radio or electronics).
In his distinctive accent, which was all the more noticable to Scottish
schoolchildren, he announced that this was a "wiyah fohmah". Despite
heckling, he subsequently refused to acknowledge that it might have had any
connection with more mundane functions.
[1] to be honest, I can't remember the standard number of turns. It might
have been less than a hundred, and I'm too lazy to work it out right now.
And it doesn't have to be 24swg, you just use whatever you can scrounge.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
OT, sorry - but are there any SCSI fans on the list who know anything about
the SCSI SCA standard? If so can you dro me an email off-list if you know
the answer to the following...
I've got a couple of drives with SCA connectors and adapters plugged into
them to bring them out to the more normal 68-pin connectors. There's a bunch
of inline resistors on each adaptor which I'd like to know whether they are
terminators or just something that's needed when connecting an SCA device to
a normal SCSI bus.
Both drives work together happily despite the resistors (have been doing for
the last 2 years anyway) which surprises me if those are terminators, but
nothing works if I try to chain anything else onto the same bus which makes
me wonder...
ps. one of the drives is 6 years old, but not ten - so take notice of 60% of
this email or something :-)
cheers
Jules
Peter Turnbull wrote:
>Another way to see what's happening, is to use 'snoop' if you have it
>on one of the Suns (tcpdump for Linux/BSD/etc is similar).
Just typing in snoop at the prompt ends up with
snoop: Command not found.
In which subdirectory might this program be (if it's on the system at all),
or how can we search for it? If it isn't, where can one possibly get it?
The printer manual has surfaced, but it only contains the information that
the Ethernet card was an add-on and had its own Installation and Configuration
Guide with it - which must be buried even deeper than the manual itself if
we were given it at all
I guess the remaining problem is really the IP address of the printer, as
the data transfer between the computers and the printer must be all right by
now: Whenever a ping or something else occurs on the network, the orange DATA
LED on the printer's back side blinks a few times (what should indicate it is
receiving the data).
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>I'd be VERY interested in seeing that schematic, Tony! I've no doubt
that it
>can be done, but I wonder how fast it will be.
The commercial ones are at least several mb/sec using drives designed for
DMA33. Only took a minute or less to transfer a set of 28 .CAB files
(w95).
The device driver runs as a SCSI device under W9x or NT4.
Allison
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tony Duell" <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
>To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 11:01 AM
>Subject: Re: ide harddrive
>
>
>> >
>> > Evening folks, I am looking for a circuit using the parallel port on
a
>> > pc to Ide interface, does anyone have a schematic for one?
>>
>> Somewhere I have an data sheet for a chip to convert a parallel port
into
>> an ISA slot. No, I don't mean a chip for adding a printer port to the
ISA
>> bus (like the 82C11 does), I mean a chip that connects to a parallel
port
>> (either 'original' or one of the enhanced bidirectional ports), and to
>> some DRAM, and which allows you to connect anything that you'd
normally
>> connect to ISA on the other side of it. It allows you to read/write
any
>> port or memory location from the parallel port side, it allows the ISA
>> device to do DMA into the memory hung off the chip (which can then be
>> read/written from the parellel port), and so on.
>>
>> I think it was made by SMC, but don't quote me on that.
>>
>> It looked like a fun device to work with, but I don't know where on
earth
>> you'd find one.
>>
>> If anyone is interested, I will try and find the data sheet and post
the
>> number of the device.
>>
>> -tony
>>
>>
>
From: Richard Erlacher <edick(a)idcomm.com>
>I've seen, and, in fact, own, several parallel port to SCSI interfaces,
but
>never a parallel port to IDE type. It's quite conceivable, though. The
>software would be a pain, however.
I have one for Parallel to 3.5" IDE and another for parallel to 2.5" ide.
They work quite well and are much faster than zip or jazz drives.
Also with ECP or EPP the transfers are 8bit bidirectional. The logic
to do that is fairly simple as you simply stack up bytes or half bytes
until you have a 16bit word to write and to read you reverse that to
move successive chunks.
Allison
>From: "Russ Blakeman" <rhblake(a)bigfoot.com>
>To: <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 5:32 AM
>Subject: RE: ide harddrive
>
>
>> I thought I've seen external cases for IDE HDD's off parallel ports
before,
>> I'll have to run back through my feeble memory banks and figure out
where I
>> saw one.
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>> > [mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Clint Wolff
(VAX
>> > collector)
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:33 PM
>> > To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>> > Subject: Re: ide harddrive
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > it'd be a fairly complicated schematic... The IDE interface is 16
bit
>> > wide data, and a standard parallel port only has four bits of input.
>> > An enhanced parallel port (EPP) can turn the data bits around, but
>> > then you don't have any lines for RD*/WR*/A0-A2/CS1Fx*CS3Fx*, etc...
>> >
>> > I certainly wouldn't want to do it, though I'm sure it can be
done...
>> >
>> > clint
>> >
>> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, bill claussen wrote:
>> >
>> > > Evening folks, I am looking for a circuit using the parallel port
on a
>> > > pc to Ide interface, does anyone have a schematic for one?
>> > >
>> > > I also have 20 (2.5 in) toshiba 4.8 gig drives (new and in sealed
>> > > antistatic). these are 2 mm interface ata4 44pin that I will
offer to
>> > > sell to the group before listing them at ebay. ($75 ea + shipping)
>> > >
>> > > I also have AMD K6-2 233 AFR Socket 7 processors (new) these also
will
>> > > be offered to the group for ($20 ea), before I place them on ebay
as
>> > > well.
>> > >
>> > > I am going to put them up in two weeks, so if any one is
interested
>> > > please email me at
>> > > elecdata(a)kcinter.net
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > Bill Claussen
>> > > Elecdata1 (ebay)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell) wrote:
> I've found enough of the data sheet (long story) to be able to say that
> the device in question (printer port -> ISA slot, in that direction) is
> the SMC34C60 (it was made by SMC, I remembered it correctly).
>
> I don't know if you can still get a data sheet (it was about 6 years ago
> I was looking at this), but it might be worth trying to hunt it down
Don't know how much this will help you, Tony, but keying "34C60" into
www.google.com brings up a link to a PDF datasheet as the first item:
http://www.smsc.com/main/datasheets/34c60.pdf
-Frank McConnell
From: Mike Ford <mikeford(a)socal.rr.com>
>>I'm old, dirts older. When I was in school you were really cool of
your
>>radio
>>had six transistors, cooler if it had FM and rich if your portable tape
>
>Are you sure you weren't trying to impress people with the catwhisker on
>your crystal set? ;)
I still have a few feet of very thin phosphorBronze wire from that! Nice
springy material.
The first one used a commercial diode but otherwise traditional. Later
on
I tried a long list of other rectifing materials:
Galena,
Carborundum
Super-Blue blade and pencil
CupricOxide
selenium (from a rectifier)
Silver oxides and sulphides
Rusty nails
I'd read about these in various books as a kid.
Allison
From: Bryan Pope <bpope(a)wordstock.com>
>Shack), but a razor blade and pencil lead... How do you put it
together?
Substitue the blade and pencil lead for the diode in a standard ckt.
The key is the blade be used some (corrosion) and you probe it for the
spot that renders a crude rectifieng junction.
Allison
From: R. D. Davis <rdd(a)smart.net>
>My crystal radio used a germanium diode as well - it was one of those
>Radio Shack kits back in the 1970's.... still have it somewhere.
I have no pretense of my age. By the 1970s I was working as a radio
tech (land mobile and marine) with a commercial license.
>time I checked, there were a few places still selling real "cats
>whiskers" (no - you don't catch the neighbor's cat to get one of these
Cats whisker is a thin peice of springy phospor bronze wire. Try a
peice of had drawn #30 copper with the end filed or cut to a point.
Allison
From: Russ Blakeman <rhblake(a)bigfoot.com>
>I don't think Allison's quite that old but neither am I. I can remember
>JFK's funeral on TV (BW Motorola) and they made one of the best Chevy's
when
>I was born (57) and I don't think Allison is much off from that. At
least
>she won't tell us I'm sure.
Thankyou but... I watched JFK too, Sylvania 21". Heard it on AM
broadcast
regen I'd brought to school. I was pre-'57 Chevy though my parents had
a 57 nomad wagon.
Allison
From: Russ Blakeman <rhblake(a)bigfoot.com>
>Six transistors? Hell most people on the list here had to go home after
>school to listen to info on the radio about the bombing of Japan.
That was by time I was in middle school. before that it was a Philco
AA5 (Tube set).
Allison
From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
>Don't be silly. My crystal set had a germanium diode, and I bet
Allison's
>did too :-)
V1 did. I was an avid experimenter. By 1963 I was using transistors in
a regen.
Allison
Is this a similar keyboard then the one from a TRS80 model 2000? Looks a lot
like the same on the photos I have seen...and since the machine are from a
similar "era"...
If thats the case, I hooked up a more recent Tandy TX (83 Keys?) keyboard to
an old TRS80 model 2000 and all works fine...the pinout on the connector is
just not the same (I made an DIN adapter plug so I did not have to modify
the TX keyboard)...
I suspect this might also work fort machines like the TRS80 model IVP...and
similars...
Claude
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 11:20:53 -0500
>From: Club 27 <thomas_disher(a)sympatico.ca
<mailto:thomas_disher@sympatico.ca
<mailto:thomas_disher@sympatico.ca> > >
>Subject: Need Tandy 6000 Keyboard
>
>Dear Museum founder: Have a Tandy 6000 HD system operating in Xenix.
>Have all the original 8 ? " floppies for the OS, and for 'Scripsit' (Word
>Processing), and for 'Unify' (a RDMS) -- including all the Owners Manuals,
>and even the Technical Service Manual. However, I really need to keep
>this old mini-computer working for another 2 years before I pass it along
>to some collector or museum.
> I am prepared to make a deal (YOU can set the terms) with the
>individual who is directly instrumental in providing the assistance I need
>to keep my keyboard operational or who can assist me to acquire one or
>preferably two old keyboards for this unit. The problem is that the
>individual key contacts are failing, one after another. They are easily
>repaired/replaced-but I have run out of the ability to switch the sound
>contact pads from the seldom used redundant keys to those that have
>failed. I am unable to find a source for these wee electrical contacts,
>and am looking to - beg, borrow or steal, or buy - a whole keyboard or two
>from which I can pirate the needed parts.
> Can you help me, and/or redirect me ? What would be your terms ?
>Tom - at Club 27
>
On Mar 28, 17:22, John Honniball wrote:
> Well, I can remember the days of 405-line TV here in
> England. We watched it on a valve set made by Pye (now
> part of Philips). By the time of the Moon landings we had
> dual-standard 405/625 and VHF/UHF sets. Oh, and BBC 2 was
> a new channel on UHF, 625-line only!
I had a collection of Ferguson 405-line sets. They all seemed to be
remarkably similar inside, and by the time I was about 14 I got to be
reasonably good at fixing them. My first "video monitor" was a cast-off
405-line 14" 'portable'. I stripped out the tuner (it was a turret tuner
and almost every segment was broken) and some of the RF valves. It had a
series heater chain so I added a few high-wattage resistors to make up for
that, and tweaked the circuit a bit to handle the video from my first Exidy
Sorcerer.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
From: Jeffrey S. Sharp <jss(a)ou.edu>
>I'm 22. These were cool when I was in early grade school. If you
wanted to
>be the coolest kid, your boombox had a TV and detachable speakers.
I'm old, dirts older. When I was in school you were really cool of your
radio
had six transistors, cooler if it had FM and rich if your portable tape
could take
5 or 7" reels.
Allison
On Mar 28, 21:43, Peter Joules wrote:
> I remember my prep school trying to raise funds to buy a reel to reel
video
> recorder (1969). My dad said that it was a ridiculous idea - "no one
will
> ever want to record TV programmes"
The school I worked in around 1981 was still using B/W reel-to-reel video.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 28, 19:18, Tony Duell wrote:
> > I do remember my father buying a Philips Compact Cassette recorder when
> > they were new and even cooler than my 7-transistor radio finished in
red
>
> Cassette? Heck, I've got a portable reel-to-reel audio recorder here.
> I've even got a portable reel-to-reel _video_ recorder and camera that is
> still operational. And a portable U-matic recorder in need of a little
TLC...
Well, he already had a Ferrograph reel-to-reel, to replace the old Grundig
reel-to-reel he had before :-) He was into gadgets. I had a little
portable reel-to-reel, it took 3" reels.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
In a message dated 3/26/01 3:07:26 PM Central Standard Time, azog(a)azog.org
writes:
<< I think I recall seeing somewhere that you can bypass extensions on bootup
by pressing a shift key, but that didn't work, so I assume that this isn't
an extension, but something intergral into the OS itself... >>
no password schemes are in the os itself. try holding down the left shift key
again as soon as you see the happy mac. if its system 7 or higher, it will
say extensions disabled. if that don't work, you'll need to find a system
floppy to boot from so you can mount the hard drive and take a look around.
Such as http://members.aol.com/djadamson7/articles/foxhole.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence LeMay [mailto:lemay@cs.umn.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 2:38 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Crystal Radios (was Re: List spammer ID'd)
They are known as Foxhole Radios, and you can find more information by
using a web search engine.
-Lawrence LeMay
Woah, just stepped over the threshold from reading to contributing - even if
it's only a question :-)
I've a TK50 drive that I'm trying to get to work with my Vax.
After discovering that it didn't work (the tape never wound itself out into
the drive) I took off the cover.
There appears to be a piece of stiffish tape connected to the central spinny
bit (okay, I know stiffish, and spinny bit aren't the most technical of
words! :-), but the other end appears to have been chewed off. I presume
this would have the task of extracting the tape from the cartridge.
Is there anyplace I can get spares for this part (in the UK), or
instructions for constructing something similar myself (I've got a few
sacrifical tapes while I experiment).
I'd be grateful for any ideas. In fact I'm intrigued how the things meant to
work!
Cheers,
Duncan.
Hi,
I'm new to the group. Does anyone have any information on the old HP
9845 desktop computers, specifically, if any working units still exist?
I have manuals and a bunch of old software, including some extremely
high-end games, both on 8" floppy and on tape. I'd love to at least be
able to pull off some listings or get some of the data transferred to a
current medium.
Thanks.
RT
Hi, I have a 'Morse Technologies KP 286HF' mainboard with
an AMD-Processor - the board works, but I don't have the slightest
idea about the jumper settings ... I put 4 MB in it, but it only
recognizes 640Kb and I assume, that for clocking it to 12Mhz the
(not available) Turbo-Button should be pressed ?!?
For any hints or links to manuals I would be very glad ...
Cheers,
Mario
At 12:21 AM 3/27/01 -0800, you wrote:
>> > There I found and passed up a HP 9000 835 and a HP 9836A. BUT I did
>> > bring home a HP 9000 520 (aka HP 9020). :-)
>
>Can a 9000-520 read 9845 disks/tapes?
I don't know but the drive on the 520 is 5 1/4" and I think you said
that your disks were 8" so that won't work. Besides my 520 seems to have
problems.
What kind of drive were your 8" disks recorded on? The HP 9885 and
9895 are very different. FWIW I have both. I'd guessing that the best way
to read your disk would be an one of the NEWER 9000 series 200 or 300
machines such as a 9836. How many disk do you have that need to be
transferred anyway?
Joe
>
>I'll ask my ex-NASA buddies if they still have any 9000 stuff. (They
>replaced our 9845 with those right after I left.)
>
>RT
>
At 12:20 AM 3/27/01 -0800, you wrote:
>
>
>> P.S. If the BASIC listing uses keywords in optional ROMs, and the working
>> machine doesn't have those ROMs, what happens when you try to print out the
>> listing?
>
>Good question....
>
I don't know for sure but it will probably print something like "XROM
xx,yy". That's what some of the other HPs do. xx will be an id number
assigned to that ROM and yy will be the number of the routine in the ROM.
XROM of courxe means eXternal ROM. XROM xx,yy is how HP usually encodes
the call in memory. If the ROM is present then the routine name will be
printed (or executed in the run mode) otherwise it prints the XROM message
(or halts with an error and displays the XROM numbers in run mode).
I have plenty of 9845 ROMs, I can probably loan you what you need.
Joe
Here's the URL to Jim Brick's website. As many of you may well know,
Brick was co-author of _Bit-Slice Microprocessor Design_ with John Mick.
http://www.brick.org/jim/
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
>Jeff Hellige skrev:
>Well, transceivers do have the tendency to fall off their mounting point... =)
>As for the size of AUI transceivers, they have been absolutely gargantuan once
>upon a time. We've got a BULL 10B2 transceiver connected to a pocket hub at
>the usergroup, and the transceiver actually dwarfs the hub!
>Then again, I have a stack of pocket transceivers which are actually smaller
>than my AAUI ones.
>The cable is a nice addition, though.
I actually came up with an HP transceiver that proves my own point
invalid. It's about the size of a zippo cigarette lighter, but a little
thicker. It's a model# 28685B Ethertwist transceiver and it has dip
switches to enable SQE, Link and Loopback test as well as use of a long
cable. It also has 6 status LEDS near the 10base-T connector. I do have a
small 5-port hub that isn't much larger than some of the AAUI transceivers I
have though.
Jeff
If anyone has a programmer's manual for either of these daisywheel
printers, I'd really love to know how to invoke the following functions:
DECFIL (Right Justification)
DECFPP (Positioning)
DECPSPP (Print Specified Printwheel Position)
DECPTS (Printwheel Table Select)
DECSS (Set Space Size)
DECUND (Programmable Underline Character)
I don't need full descriptions, but I would like to know the sequence in
the form:
CSI ? 80 h
or
CSI Ps ; Ps " z
I have a database that is supposed to cover every ANSI-compliant
sequence for DEC terminals and printers, but it has some gaps!
Cheers,
Paul
I just picked up a complete Sparc 10 system and I am having some video
problems. When the system boots, the video is all ripped and looks like
it wants to be in two columns. It seems to be in the wrong video mode.
It does the same thing with both the mono monitor and color monitor I
have for it. Popped the cover and it has a SUN GX video option board
installed.
Any idea's?
Thanks,
Brian.
Here's something I found this morning that I thought some of you might
be interested in. It's a graphing of the Unix timeline/family tree by Eric
Levenez:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/levenez/unix/history.html
Jeff
On Mar 28, 1:33, Tony Duell wrote:
>On Mar 28, 0:52, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> > As for impedance, I was under the impression, judging from the current
> > discussion on the topic of 10B5 wiring, that the actual work of making
the AUI
> > output ethernet-worthy lay in the transceiver.
>
> That's one part of it. But the AUI interface is part of the standard too
> -- any device should be able to work with any transceiver. The AUI
> interface consists of 3 differential ECL signals (AC coupled
> essentially), which should be carried on twisted-pair transmission lines
> (I think the characteristic impedance is somewhere around 100 Ohms, but
> don't quote me on that).
78 ohms. The standard also specifies maximum length of 50m for the thick
AUI cable, but "office grade" cables have higher losses and are typically
only rated for a quarter of that.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
On Mar 27, 20:13, Lawrence Walker wrote:
> The Atari ST is an integrated machine. I guess you mean a TT.
> Also the DEC Micros - Rainbow et al, with the LK201 KB.
The MegaST uses an RJ12 for its separate keyboard.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Well, that last "ghetto blaster" spam was interesting in the fact that the
sender made no attempt at all to hide their identity, or to relay through
open third-party servers. Because of this, I believe it may just have been
sheer ignorance on the part of bitways that turned them to the Dark Side of
the 'Net.
I've fired off a LART to mediascape.de, which appears to be the upstream
provider for the company that did the deed. I will know shortly if this is
true.
Maybe we could all chip in and send them a ten-year old boom-box? ;-)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner and head honcho, Blue Feather Technologies
http://www.bluefeathertech.com // E-mail: kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
Amateur Radio: WD6EOS since Dec. '77 (Extra class as of June-2K)
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates to me that it would be
superior to what I have now..." (Gym Z. Quirk, aka Taki Kogoma).
>From: Ethan Dicks <ethan_dicks(a)yahoo.com>
>Subject: Mac haul and print server questions
>
>The March winds have been unsurpassed at depositing Macintosh parts at my
>feet. Last week, at my new job, a new co-worker gave me a pair of AAUI
>10BaseT transceivers; the show at Dayton disgorged a Quadra 660AV; and the
>university surplus turned out to be a gold mine. For $5 each, I picked up
>a 15" Mac monitor, two LC IIIs, two IIsis, an external 170Mb disk,
>and an Apple
>external 80Mb disk. I got for free from the cable bin, some LocalTalk cables,
>three LocalTalk dongles, one PhoneNet dongle (w/terminator) and three data-
>center-grade AUI cables, including a DEC-branded one (perfect for my VAX8200)
>Most of these accessories I've been looking for with some intensity of late.
Nice haul.
>Finally, now that I have an abundance of Ethernet-capable Macs, I want to turn
>to a long-standing project - turning a Mac into an Ethernet<->LocalTalk print
>server. I don't care if I have to sacrifice one of my larger Macs and run
>a variety of UNIX, but what I want is to be able to print from other machines,
>UNIX, Windoze, Amiga, etc., over whatever protocol I can manage to universally
>support, and print to this HP Deskwriter 660 that is sitting here, lonely.
>Additionally, I could drive an HP LaserJet 4/ML over the LocalTalk port from
>the same print server. Are there any packages for the Mac that will let me
>share the printer with non-Apple-based machines? Is there something like
>CAP (Columbua AppleTalk Protocol?) for Windoze? (I've used it with Linux)
The closest thing to CAP for Windows would be PC-MACLAN from Miramar
systems (www.miramarsys.com). There is also, of course, Thursby's
Dave which whould give you Windows networking on the Mac.
If we're talking just printing, then you might want to look for one
of the old 'lpd' packages for the mac, though I'm not sure how the
Windows boxes would fit in.
Personally, I'd consider moving the LaserJet to a Linux box running
netatalk (like CAP, but nicer) and possibly also installing a
LocalTalk board. As an alternative to the LocalTalk card, use a
second system (LC III or IIsi) with a minimal system running Apple's
LocalTalk Bridge.
<<<john>>>
I second that :)
At 04:27 PM 3/27/01 -0500, you wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Curt Vendel wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Arrangements are set for me to drive down Sunday to pick up the
> equipment, I
> > will start working on the list of who has asked for what and post it
> here in the
> > mailinglist, the stuff is getting spoken for quickly, up to about 15
> people have
> > asked for 1 workstation each, a few asked for 2. I will post where
> we are at
> > sometime late tonight.
> >
> >
> > Curt
>
>Hi Curt,
>
>Is it too late for me to put in a request for a workstation?
>
>Thanks,
>
>greg
>
>Gregory Travis
>Cornerstone Information Systems ATS
>greg(a)ciswired.com
>812 330 4361 ext. 18