Hi,
I've just acquired a nice little Sharp plotter/printer (model CE-515P).
It seems to be in reasonably good condition and it works (to some extent).
Only problem is, I don't have a manual. Does anyone here know what the
control codes for this little thing are? I also need the pinouts for the
RS232C port on the back.
Also, does anyone know where to get pens and plotter rolls for this
thing?
--
Phil.
http://www.philpem.f9.co.uk/
philpem(a)bigfoot.com
Hi folks,
I thought there was only 1 version of this machine going by what I'd seen in
magazines and the like, and I thought I had it already, but today I picked
up another one in slightly better condition that has a VU meter similar to
that found on the Video Genie I for tape loading purposes. I'm going to do a
search now and a like-for-like comparison on tuesday (got to work my arse
off tomorrow getting the cloakroom ready for the plasterers) but if anyone's
got any insight that'd be smart.
cheers!
adrian/witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - the Online Computer Museum
0:OK, 0:1
Hello all!
I was going through my old and embarassing posts on
groups.google.com and found out/remembered that I have
an HP 98286 DIO-I card for HP 9000 series 300.
It has a 286 processor but unfortunately I don't have
the software necessary to use it.. if anyone has the
software I'd really like to know as I want to try some
older games like Leisuresuit Larry on HP-UX :)
(a nice game btw, I know of at least PC, Amiga and Mac
versions. Might be more)
--
jht
This is a little odd, but I seem to be in possession of a TI99/4
that was intended for someone else. Sometime the week-before-last
a box turned up from Canada, addressed to me, with an import tag
reading "PDP DEC Books & Parts", but which in fact contained a 99/4.
I recognized the return address as being the guy that I purchased
some stuff from some time back on eBay, so I sent a message asking
where this thing was _really_ supposed to go and offering to help
it on its way. The message didn't bounce, nor has there been a
reply.
I'm better that the odds are at least even that someone on the list
did a deal to get this box. To that end, if someone can tell me
what was included (there's more than a 99/4 in the box) and who the
deal was done with I'll accept that they're the counterparty to the
deal and send it on its way.
Man, the things we do to preserve Good Collecting Karma :-)
Cheers,
Chris.
--
Chris Kennedy
chris(a)mainecoon.com
http://www.mainecoon.com
PGP fingerprint: 4E99 10B6 7253 B048 6685 6CBC 55E1 20A3 108D AB97
Hello, all:
Futher errors have been found in the Altair32 8080 processor emulator code
by some eagle-eyed users. So, I'm trying to fix them, but my lack of depth
in C programming has become evident. So, I'd like to enlist some help again.
Here's the code (cut and paste; written by Claus Giloi):
uchar regs[8] ; // A, F, B, C, D, E, H, L - actual storage order!
// 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
// pointer array for sss, ddd addressing
uchar * b_regs[8]=
{®s[2],®s[3],®s[4],®s[5],®s[6],®s[7],&dummy,®s[0]} ;
// B C D E H L trap! ACC
// pointer array for rp addressing
ushort * w_regs[4] =
{ (ushort *)®s[2], (ushort *)®s[4], (ushort *)®s[6], &SP } ;
// B D H SP
As you 8080 users know, several instructions operate on register pairs
instead of individual registers. The instruction that began this odyssey was
INX H. The INX B/D/H instructions increment the BC, DE, HL pairs. INX SP
works. B/D/H don't. While the individual register halves reflect the proper
values, the word registers are reversed. I guess it's because when accessing
a word value in an array, the CRT code swaps the high-order and low-order
bytes.
So, I used the following code, which produces the desired result but is
what I can only assume to be the sledgehammer way of doing what I want (lots
of snipping):
// u is the opcode and
switch ((u&RP_MASK)>>4){ // RP_MASK isolates register pairs
case 2: //HL
tmpH = *pH ; // pointer to H storage
tmpL = tmpL2 = *pL ;
tmpL++;
if (((tmpL & 0xff) == 0) && (tmpL2 == 0xff)) tmpH++ ;
*pH = tmpH ; // save regs
*pL = tmpL ;
break ;
// other cases omitted.
}
What I do is manually manipulate the byte registers (watching for rollover)
to get the desired result, totally skipping the w_regs array. Bogus I admit,
but it works.
I can only imagine that there is a better way to do this. So, I'm asking
for help finding the better way.
Thanks again.
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
(..must...try...resending...)
Quoting Iggy Drougge <optimus(a)canit.se>:
>
> PCI runs on shared interrupts and seems fast enough to me.
Well, DIO-II maxes out at about 5MB/s :)
>
> HPIB disks? Can't say that I've seen a single one in my entire life.
They're lovely. I'm just saving them for those /500-machines as they
can only use HP-IB disks.
>
> >Depends if you want to use it for anything useful or not.
>
> I really can't imagine either system doing anything useful, since I'm
> essentially a UNIX hater, so that is of secondary importance. I just
> can't
> deal with HP-UX 10.something on the 822, it's so dreadfully slow, and
> then
> it's got binaries cluttered all over /etc for some very odd reason.
Well, gimme the 822 if it bothers you that much :-). Anyway, it's probably
possible to run HP-BASIC on it too but if I had to choose between HP-UX
and NetBSD I'd take NetBSD. I do have HP-UX on some machines tough.
> But then all that would require is a new crystal, right?
There are some conflicting rumors on the 385. Basically HP-UX and NetBSD
recognise the machine (380/385) via MMU_ID. This changes if you move
one of the wait-state jumpers near the processor (marked 33/25 or
something). I have a 25MHz 385.. Anyway, some reports say that a real
385 would be 33MHz and some say 40MHz.
> I don't suppose HP have got any hobbyist programme?
Not that I know of. You can shell out couple of thousand bucks on 9.1 or
contact someone with a lot of different HP-UX versions on CD or 9144 tape.
--
jht
----- End forwarded message -----
--
jht
I need to find a working Maxtor XT-4175E disk drive.
I've had the wonderful fortune to have picked up a Heurikon VME532 (NS32532
based) development system. This is probably the fastest single-processor
32532 system produced (Encore MultiMax was of course faster, with more
processors).
The bonus is that this system is running GNX 3.1 with the National
Semiconductor cc compiler, along with a bunch of other development tools
(and source code for odd ns32k bits). Unfortunately, I don't have the
distribution media, so a disk crash would be fatal, wiping out an almost
unique machine. GNX is running on a Maxtor XT-4175E 175MB ESDI drive, and
if I could find another one, I should be able to 'dd' a bootable backup.
Does anyone on the list have one of these drives that they'd be willing to
part with, or knows where I can buy one, in order for me to have a working
backup of this system?
P.S. - Of course, if someone has GNX distribution media, I'd love to hear
>from you!
P.P.S. - If anyone has any Heurikon VME532 bits, or GNX knowledge, I'd love
to hear from you as well.
P.P.P.S. - How long has it been since I ran a Unix (a 32-bit Unix, no less)
that could fit, with development system, et. al., on a 175MB drive with room
to spare (113MB used).
Ken Seefried, CISSP
I've put some new info about the 1130 on the website, like
sizes (big) and weights (heavy). Also, I'm accepting offers
on it until June 15th. We'll see what happens...
(www.bigoakhill.com, click on ForSale).
-Bruce Keller
P.S. I'll be off-web most of next week, so I won't be able to respond to
emails until Friday.
> From: Geoff Reed <geoffr(a)zipcon.net>
> I downloaded the datasheet for the 48t02's, i think i may have a
handful of
> 32.768 xtals here so I'm looking ar chopping the tops off the bad chips
I
> have and taking protoboard and refitting them with a new xtal and
> batteryholder package that can take a replacable lithium cell. :) I
> sacrificed one yesterday to the great dremel in the sky to see how the
top
> was put together...
Your sound like serious ly damaging the top. First you can locate the
battery with a small magnet as it's steel/nickel cased. Then grind
down the the approximate center and do not grind metal away if you
can. then grind to the edges and pry old battery out. I've done a few
of these and it's that simple. Making it rocket science is unneeded.
FYI the top carries, diode, battery, crystal and two capacitors.
Allison
On May 19, Bill Janssen wrote:
> I have been looking without success for a listing of boards
> for the DEC PDP8. I have a couple of boards that I can't identify
> for DEC but am not sure what they are or what computer they are for.
A good reference can be found at:
http://world.std.com/~mbg/pdp11-field-guide.txt
[Thanks Megan!]
> The boards are M5903 and M5904. There are a couple more that I left in
> the pile.
M5903 and M5904 aren't PDP8 boards...they're part of an RH11, a
Massbus controller for Unibus-based PDP11 systems.
If you plug them into an Omnibus system like a pdp8/e, you'll likely
"let the magic smoke out".
-Dave McGuire
On May 19, 16:40, Bill Janssen wrote:
> I have been looking without success for a listing of boards
> for the DEC PDP8. I have a couple of boards that I can't identify
> for DEC but am not sure what they are or what computer they are for.
>
> The boards are M5903 and M5904. There are a couple more that I left in
> the pile.
M5903 and M5904 are MASSBUS terminal and control transceivers,
respectivley, probably out of a PDP-11.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
From: Bill Janssen <billj(a)ieee.org>
>
>The boards are M5903 and M5904. There are a couple more that I left in
>the pile.
Dont recognize them as PDP-8.
>Also is there a cheap or free terminal program that runs under MS DOS
>that will run at 110 baud. The ones I have start at 300. I gave away
>my TTY many years ago and now I can't run my PDP8E as it only goes 110.
Try an old version of procomm.
Allison
>From the PDP11-field-guide that was last updated my Megan:
M5903 RH11 U MASSBUS terminal transceiver
M5904 RH11 U MASSBUS control transceiver
Which explains why you could not find anything looking at PDP8 Lists.:)
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Janssen <billj(a)ieee.org>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Saturday, May 19, 2001 7:48 PM
Subject: ? DEC FAQ
>I have been looking without success for a listing of boards
>for the DEC PDP8. I have a couple of boards that I can't identify
>for DEC but am not sure what they are or what computer they are for.
>
>The boards are M5903 and M5904. There are a couple more that I left in
>the pile.
>
>Also is there a cheap or free terminal program that runs under MS DOS
>that will run at 110 baud. The ones I have start at 300. I gave away
>my TTY many years ago and now I can't run my PDP8E as it only goes 110.
>
>Thanks
>Bill K7NOM
Creative Micro Designs, the last "big name" in Commodore hardware
development, is dropping Commodore 8-bit support as of 1 June. :-/
http://www.cmdweb.com/
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- The superfluous is very necessary. -- Voltaire -----------------------------
On May 19, 19:24, Tony Duell wrote:
> Unfortunately, I don't have a basement. Wish I did, I'd have more space
> for classic computers :-)...
>
> > yesterday afternoon I made several hundred dollars babysitting
someone's
> > WinNT box, coaxing its 5-gig Travan cart tape backup unit to
> > retrieve one 13K file, and that took about three hours total
>
> But if what I find when I leave my machine room and get into the 'real
> world' is machines running Lusedoze that take 3 hours to recover one 13K
> file (heck, my calculator is faster than that), then I am not sure I want
> to 'get out more' :-)
It could be worse. Our campus filestore has gotten so big so fast that the
backup technology installed couldn't keep up. At one point, it was taking
25 hours to do one day's backup, so *recovering* anything was not an option
to be undertaken lightly :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
i am looking for a working powersupply (or even case portion) for a
epson qx-10
if anyone has one or knows where i can get one, please mail me
i'm trying to make a old man happy
-adam
Forgive me if this is common knowledge, but I haven't been able to dig up any information with a search engine, probably due to my very vague search terms...
Around 1974-6 I had a book that covered 8008 system design, in a kind of cookbook fashion. I'm thinking it might have been published by Ohio Scientific, but that's far from reliable. As I recall, the cover was black and it was relatively thick. I built a 8008 system using it (wire wrapped, with 256 bytes of RAM), but book and computer have both vanished since then. I'd like to find another copy for nostalgia's sake.
Does anyone have any clues?
The VCF East 1.0 web pages are now up:
http://www.vintage.org/2001/east/
Please spread the news far and wide!
*** VOLUNTEERS NEEDED ***
I am seeking about 8-10 volunteers to perform various pre-event chores as
well as to staff certain necessary positions at VCF East 1.0. Volunteers
will be rewarded with free admission to VCF East 1.0, a free VCF t-shirt
and free food and drink.
Volunteers are needed to post event notices in and around the
Boston/Marlborough area, spread flyers around at various functions that
would attract attendees, send out messages to newsgroups, and also to
perform certain duties at the VCF East.
If you are interested, please e-mail me at <sellam(a)vintage.org>.
Thanks!
SPREAD THE WORD!!!
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
Well a good week for me. I found a "not to active anymore" collector who
lived around here and traded a few duplicate extra systems and periphs I
had...
And I got:
Full kit DEC Rainbow with DEC LA50 printer and all original binders,
reference cards, stickers etc...I guess everything there except the original
boxes...
TRS80 model I with monitor in very good shape.
TRS80 model 200 that looks like it was almost never used at all.
I might not be keeping the DEC LA50 so trade offers welcome I guess...I have
no idea of how interesting this LA50 printer is...or is not...
I just have no space for printers...
Claude
http://computer_collector.tripod.com
>Actually I was talking about using the 3rd party controller to boot the
>system after you remove the ROMs from the /53. I'm not talking about
>putting the ROMs from the 3rd party disk controller into the sockets on
>the /53, which obviously wouldn't work so well.
A perfect example would be the DSD-880 unit. The interface for it can
be configured not to provide the boot code if the system has integral
code for booting RL02 or RX02, but the interface can also be configured
to provide boot code appropriate for either at the standard address.
The only question is whether the KDJ11-D can get out of the way of
such memory references. It obviously has to be configured such that
the on-board ROM doesn't respond to any of the normal addresses for
boot code (beginning at 17765000 and 17773000, if I remember correctly).
I would have to check the manual to find out how to configure it to
do so, if it is possible.
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
The MessageLabs Virus Control Centre discovered a possible
virus or unauthorised code (such as a joke program or trojan)
in an email sent by you.
Please read this whole email carefully. It explains what has
happened to your email, which suspected virus has been caught,
and what to do if you need help.
------------------------------------------------------------
Some details about the infected message
------------------------------------------------------------
To help identify the email:
The message sender was
owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
nellielide(a)starpower.net
classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
(if this is not your email address, the message sender possibly
belongs to a mailing list to which you both subscribe.)
The message was titled 'Re: HP 1631D logic analyzer help'
The message date was Fri, 18 May 2001 22:26:27 -0400
The message identifier was <000701c0e00b$223f26c0$10152c42@nqezxeod>
The message recipients were
Lee.Davison(a)merlincommunications.com
To help identify the virus:
Scanner 1 (F-Secure) reported the following:
F-Secure Anti-Virus for i386-linux Release 4.08 build 2260
sign.def version 2001-05-17
fsmacro.def version 2001-05-16
sign2.def version 2001-05-17
669139_2MH_message.htm infection: JS/Kak.A@m
1 files scanned
1 infections found
The message was diverted into the virus holding pen on
mail server server-3.tower-17.messagelabs.com (id 669139_990239910)
and will be held for 30 days before being destroyed.
------------------------------------------------------------
What should you do now?
------------------------------------------------------------
If you sent the email from a corporate network, you should first
contact your local Helpdesk or System Administrator for advice.
They will be able to help you disinfect your workstation.
If you sent the email from a personal or home account, you will
need to disinfect your computer yourself. To do this you will
need an anti-virus program. We suggest using one of the leading
industry anti-virus packages such as McAfee, F-Secure or Cybersoft,
which cost £15-£30 per copy.
------------------------------------------------------------
Getting more help
------------------------------------------------------------
If you believe this message to be a false alarm or you require
further assistance, you can email Star Internet Support at:-
support(a)star.net.uk
or contact Star Helpdesk by telephone on:-
+44 (0) 1285 884433
Please quote the following Virus Pen ID when contacting Support.
<<< mail server server-3.tower-17.messagelabs.com (id 669139_990239910) >>>
If replying by email, please forward this entire email.
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
When I try to install PRODCL from the DECUS
distribution I get the error:
An RMS error occurred at point 0. The sts,stv values are -384. , 0.
Does anyone know what this error is, and what the problem
is with the installation?
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
On May 18, 16:06, healyzh(a)aracnet.com wrote:
> Actually I was talking about using the 3rd party controller to boot the
> system after you remove the ROMs from the /53. I'm not talking about
> putting the ROMs from the 3rd party disk controller into the sockets on
the
> /53, which obviously wouldn't work so well.
I wondered about that -- but it won't necessarily initialise everything
correctly. Emulex boot ROMs won't always set up all the registers in a
J11, or initialise large amounts of parity or ECC RAM, for example.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On May 18, 17:14, Eric Dittman wrote:
> > On May 18, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> > > The standard (as far as I know -- the ones I have came from a
> > > microPDP-11/53 in a BA23 case) boot ROMs are 23-261E5 and 23-263E5.
I seem
> > > to have accidentally left binary images in my DECROMs directory at
> > > www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/ :-)
> >
> > Eric, do you have the facilities to burn these EPROMs? If not,
> > I can help you. Feel free to contact me.
>
> Yes, I can burn most types of EPROMs, including
> the ones on this board.
Are they ordinary 27128s or something different? I've seen a lot of DEC
EPROMs which had fewer pins than "standard" -- though AFAIR only 8KB ones.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On May 18, Eric Dittman wrote:
> > Eric, do you have the facilities to burn these EPROMs? If not,
> > I can help you. Feel free to contact me.
>
> Yes, I can burn most types of EPROMs, including
> the ones on this board.
Good deal.
-Dave
On May 18, 13:41, healyzh(a)aracnet.com wrote:
> On May 18, 14:06, Eric Dittman wrote:
> > I've been gifted with a PDP-11/53 (or 53+) CPU module.
> I just heard from someone a few minutes ago, that if you've got a 3rd
party
> disk controller that you can boot the system off you should be able to
> simply remove the ROM's.
Well, only if they fit, physically and electrically. Most 3rd-party boot
ROMs I've seen (eg Dilog, Emulex, Plessey, GR, etc) wouldn't be the right
type for the board. The code might work; I suspect the ROMs from an 11/73
or 11/83 might work. I never used an 11/53 much, but from what I remember
it's pretty much like other 11/73+ or 11/83 boards, just with memory on it
as well as SLUs and bootstrap etc. I've no doubt someone else (Megan?
Allison? others?) can expand on the differences.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> Has anybody tried one of the DALLAS "smart socket" products with
this
thingie?
Unfortunately the 48T02 is a TOD clock and calendar as well as
NVRAM, so
there's no suitable SmartSocket to replace it. The registers have
to be at
particular places and use a particular protocol too.
Just got the data sheet and the Dallas DS1642 is a direct form, fit and
function replacement for the MK48T02(B).
It says so right at the start of the sheet.
Cheers,
Lee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
information contained in this email may contain information which is
confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
If you have received this email and you are not a named addressee please
delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp
On May 18, 17:32, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On May 18, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> > or 11/83 might work. I never used an 11/53 much, but from what I
remember
> > it's pretty much like other 11/73+ or 11/83 boards, just with memory on
it
> > as well as SLUs and bootstrap etc. I've no doubt someone else (Megan?
> > Allison? others?) can expand on the differences.
>
> I believe the memory on the 11/53 board can be accessed much faster
> than memory on the qbus, as well.
Yes, I believe so. Anyone know *how much* faster? I don't think it was
all that much faster than PMI memory. And I think the /53 *doesn't* work
with PMI, which the /73 and /83 do (only the /83 was supported to use it,
though).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On May 17, 22:10, Louis Schulman wrote:
> OK, the power supply works! I have power on the motherboard. Now on
> to the next problem.
>
> When attached to a composite monitor, I get video, but it is a
> rolling/pulsing screen. Yes, I have the sync set to 60 Hz.
I've seen that happen on Mark 1's where the sync isn't well matched to the
monitor's needs and it couldn't lock. That seemd to happen with 50Hz
versions and certain monitors, due to the timing of the sync pulse relative
to the start of frame. Since this is a Mark 2 and I assume you're using it
at 60Hz, I doubt that's the problem. Does switching between the 50Hz and
60Hz settings make a difference? If so, there's probably something wrong
with the timing.
Looking at the schematic, VSYNC is generated by the counters and
multiplexers at 13A, 19B, 20B and 21B, and the 74LS74 flipflops at 18A and
18B. The 50Hz/60Hz switch controls the multiplexers at 13A and 19B, and
they choose the reload values for the counters at 20B and 21B. You should
see a high multiple (I'm too lazy to work out the frequency :-)) of 60Hz at
21B pin 15 and a lower multiple at 20B-15. That in turn feeds the LS74 at
18B, via the gate at 16A, and the VSYNC signal comes out of 18B-5. If you
have a scope, that will tell you if the signal looks about right, if not,
but you have a logic probe, at least you can look for 60Hz pulses.
If it's extreme, perhaps the vsync isn't getting to the video socket. It's
mixed by ORing it [1] with the HSYNC in the LS32 at 9B (pin 9 is VSYNC, 10
is HSYNC, 11 is composite). The composite sync is buffered by by an LS04
at 10H (in pin 10, out pin 11) and then via R59 is mixed with the video
data (via R58) to the base of the video transistor.
[1] which is what causes the problem for some 50HZ monitors; the HSYNC is
effectively lost during the VSYNC pulse, which is very close to the first
used scan line, so the top few lines of the screen tend to tear.
> So, can you supply a troubleshooting procedure to find where the
> problem lies? Again, keep in mind that this is a Sorcerer II (with
> apparently 32K in Rows 2 and 3, is this the proper configuration)?
Two rows is quite normal -- if the ICs are 4116 or equivalent you have 32K;
if they're 4104 or equivalent you have 8K. I think you mean rows B and C
(look for the numbers at the edge of the board). Physical row C is
actually "row 1" or bank 1 as far as the RAM decode is concerned, and row B
is bank 2. Row A is bank 3. The banks have to be filled in order 1,2,3
(rows C,B,A). So, yes, your setup is normal.
If you can read the screen display, BASIC will tell you how much RAM is
free after it initialises. If you don't have BASIC, the monitor ROM will
tell you the address of the top of RAM after it initialises.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On May 18, 14:06, Eric Dittman wrote:
> So, does any here have a source for bootable ROMs
> for this CPU?
The standard (as far as I know -- the ones I have came from a
microPDP-11/53 in a BA23 case) boot ROMs are 23-261E5 and 23-263E5. I seem
to have accidentally left binary images in my DECROMs directory at
www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/ :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On May 18, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> The standard (as far as I know -- the ones I have came from a
> microPDP-11/53 in a BA23 case) boot ROMs are 23-261E5 and 23-263E5. I seem
> to have accidentally left binary images in my DECROMs directory at
> www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/ :-)
Eric, do you have the facilities to burn these EPROMs? If not,
I can help you. Feel free to contact me.
-Dave McGuire
On May 18, Pete Turnbull wrote:
> or 11/83 might work. I never used an 11/53 much, but from what I remember
> it's pretty much like other 11/73+ or 11/83 boards, just with memory on it
> as well as SLUs and bootstrap etc. I've no doubt someone else (Megan?
> Allison? others?) can expand on the differences.
I believe the memory on the 11/53 board can be accessed much faster
than memory on the qbus, as well.
-Dave McGuire
It seems that someone told the seller his PDP-11/34 didn't have CPU
cards. The seller ended the auction and relisted, this time with a
bullet point saying "Sorry there are no CPU cards".
--
Jeffrey S. Sharp
jss(a)ou.edu
"Hans Franke" <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de> said:
> Well, as long as you think along a 'real' drum with flying heads
> etc. you're right, but there is a simple solution - take a card
> board tube and warp regular cassete tape around, and let a head
> read/write this tape ... if you take an old style washing powder
> drum (ca. 30 cm diameter / 1 ft) you get a lenght of about 1m
> (3 ft 4") - what was the usual speed of cassetes ? 4 cm/s ? I'm
> not shure (Tony ?), as a rough estimation you get a track size
> of some 3 kByte and an average access time of 12s not to bad ...
I have this really sick and perverted habit of picking up
unusual items just in case they might be useful for future
projects. All of this talk about building a drum storage
reminded me of something that I added to my eclectic resource
pile a few years ago, an old drum type fax machine.
But, when it comes to adding mass storage to a digital
computer system, IMHO I can't think of anything faster,
easier, or more reliable than the old Commodore 1541.
* The DOS is built-in.
* Only the system side communication routines need to be
written and there is commented source code to use as
examples.
* The drive side communication routines can also be
rewritten.
* Since the communication with the drive is normally
handled with very robust handshaking, the speed of the
computer system is totally unimportant. This also means
that disk I/O can be easily interrupted.
* And additional drives can be daisy-chained on the same
bus.
Regards,
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================
Another pointer to a web page about chemicals to remove grease and nicotine
for many surfaces.
http://www.energy2green.com/uses4.html
Seems to me that these products will clean computer stuff as well as car
parts.
http://www.idealchemicalproducts.com/AutoDetail-1.html
I especially like the part that lets you pick the fragrance you prefer.
I think Pina Colada or Bubble gum would be perfect for a Mac. :)
That's the next wave in computing, different fragrances to match the color
of you computer. I'm really partial to ozone when I'm around big iron.
Deodorants
Spray deodorants for use in auto detail shops
Available in Bag-N-Box
Long lasting fragrances
Super concentrated
Water soluble
Contains no colorants
USES: our deodorants are super concentrated and water soluble. Each product
should be diluted with water prior to use and can be used to reduce malodors
in a variety of applications including automobiles, campers, tractor cabs
and sleeper areas, automobile trunks, bathrooms and shower areas, hotels and
motels, nursing homes, day care centers, restaurant garbage areas and any
musty damp areas. Each of our deodorants dilutes easily with water and will
not harm any surface not harmed by water. Our deodorants are non staining,
long lasting and economical to use. USE DIRECTIONS: mix 4 to 8 ounces of our
concentrate with 1 gallon of water. Fill either a trigger spray bottle or
pump up sprayer with dilute solution and spray area to be treated. Repeat if
necessary. Concentrates can also be used in the evaporative air flow type
room deodorizers. Simply pour concentrate into the holding container or tank
and close door. All the different fragrances that we offer are listed below
with product number for ordering
* PEACHIE (Fruit) 4-248
* HALT (Cherry) 4-239
* LEMON 4-372
* STRAWBERRY 4-444
* ORANGE 4-241
* BABY FACE (Baby Powder) 4-312
* LIME 4-445
* VANILLA 4-242
* WATERMELON 4-255
* PINEY 4-373
* PARADISE (Floral) 4-912
* PINA COLADA (Coconut) 4-246
* RASPBERRY 4-446
* BUBBLE GUM 4-243
Mike
mmcfadden(a)cmh.edu
From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de>
>
>Maybe I should specify my question ... I need to know
>at what date these chips where at first available -
>not just the era. A good single IC to use could be the
>74181 ALU.
Around 71. Then the H, S, LS, ALS and F parts.
>> I have a 74 TTL design guide at home, so I'll check it too.
>
>The oldest datasheet I could find says Dec 1972 for the 74S181
Sounds close to right. The S however was later the basic 74181
was first. Infact the July 1972 issue of Ham Radio Has a supplier
selling the 74181 for $4.50!!
Allison
On May 18, 11:30, Hans Franke wrote:
> AFAIR you also have to use either 'adaptor plugs - or fit a new pwower
> cable, since the Sorcerer had a fixed one. And there is nothing more
> stupid in the world of power transmission than these plugs ...
The power cable is fixed, but the plug on the end (that goes into the wal
socket) was not a mouilded plug; it was a rewirable one, so it's very easy
to remove and fit an appropriate type without mangling the cable. Not
usaully a problem for me anyway, as it happens I have some Schuko sockets
on my bench as well as lots of British 13A sockets.
> Unless the PS is already switchable and there is a Kaltgeraetestecker
> (no idea how these inlet connectors are called in english, where the
> power cord is detatchable)
The three-pin type I think you mean we just call an IEC inlet or IEC
socket. The ones that have the notch we call "hot-condition" IEC
plugs/sockets (like the ones you get on a kettle).
> I always keep the original condition - for
> the short time I play around with a specific unit (seldom more than a
> few weeks) a stepdown transformer is a fine solution.
Sensible enough, but in this case there is provision inside the Sorcerer to
rewire the transformer primaries, and it's documented in the manuals.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
In a message dated 5/18/01 12:18:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
cmurillo(a)manizales.autonoma.edu.co writes:
> "Iggy Drougge" wrote:
> -snip-
> > they let me have it
> > for 50 crowns. My pleasure.
>
> You were lucky; I'm envious. I'd like to have more of these.
>
Heck, I'd like to have ONE!
-Linc Fessenden
In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.
On May 17, 19:34, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> Has anybody tried one of the DALLAS "smart socket" products with this
thingie?
Unfortunately the 48T02 is a TOD clock and calendar as well as NVRAM, so
there's no suitable SmartSocket to replace it. The registers have to be at
particular places and use a particular protocol too.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
"Iggy Drougge" wrote:
-snip-
> they let me have it
> for 50 crowns. My pleasure.
You were lucky; I'm envious. I'd like to have more of these.
> Once I had bought it, though, I though that
> 9000/300 was a suspiciously low number. Wasn't that some kind of 68010 based
> machine? And why would such a machine have two Ethernet NICs?
It probably found a second life as a router. Good for the guy
who realized that the machine was still useful.
> It really semed
> like a waste, but on the underground ride how, I pulled out the big board with
> all the ports, which seemed notably shinier and newer than the NIC above, and
> found that it had a 68040. I thus deducted that it must be a 9000/380. Has
> this machine been upgraded, or did HP simply not bother to identify their
> machines any closer than the series (in this case 9000/300)?
That's indeed the case. All hp300 systems were pretty modular, although
there were some, such as the 340, that were more closed.
> In any case, it came without keyboard, and I read that in order to switch it
> over to serial terminal mode, one would have to perform a certain manoeuvre
> via the keyboard. Bloody well thought out, HP! Is there no way to use a serial
> terminal without any HIL keyboard involved?
I was forced to leave my 380's monitor behind (darn hp98754a weighed
about 100 pounds!) when I moved. I haven't yet gotten down to
setting up the 380 in its new home, and I will have to reconfigure
it to use a serial console. But I do have some HP-HIL keyboards.
> The machine starts up and beeps a little. It's got not drives installed, but
> there's a 50-pin "Centronics" connector marked SCSI/FS-HPIB. What is FS-HPIB?
> Doesn't sound like anything I'd like to feed into my SCSI devices.
The connectors in mine are marked (left to right, top to bottom)
1) BNC for LAN
2) AUI
3) parallel port (pc style)
4) HP-HIL
5) 9 pin PC style RS-232
6) SCSI/HS HP-IB (50 conductor Centronics)
7) 1/8" spkr
8) HP-IB
The board is a 98574-66510 Rev C and the ROM is labeled
1818-5062 2/22/91. The cpu is a 25MHz RC 68040.
Close to the SCSI header connector in the board there is
an unconnected 34 pin header. Maybe that's the HS-HPIB.
Indeed, HS-HPIB stands for a faster version of HPIB
that was intended for mass storage only; later 300 systems
such as the 370 had "human interface boards" (i.e., I/O
boards) with HS-HPIB in an attached cable, plus the
other usual ports and interconnects.
I use the SCSI and the standard HPIB connectors in mine
without problems and I am able to boot netBSD off an ST410800N
on the SCSI chain or HPUX 9.1 off three 330MB HPIB drives
contained in a 7963B behemoth of an enclosure; these
I plug in the standard HPIB connector. I have 64MB in
it. For a while, I used it as a pretty decent web
server. When I get it back up that's what I am going
to use it for.
I've put pictures of some of the stuff above at
http://jimulco.autonoma.edu.co/~carlos/hp/
No hp380 pics yet, though. Later.
carlos.
--
Carlos E. Murillo-Sanchez email: carlos_murillo(a)ieee.org
Universidad Autonoma de Manizales, Manizales, Colombia
and
428 Phillips Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Does anyone in the list here on the east coast have a 19" rack they are
looking to get rid of? I really could put on of those to goo use.
-Linc Fessenden
In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.
gee, without CPU cards, it can hardly be *called* an 11/34... just
a BA11 box which just so happens to have an 11/34 programmers
console attached...
(maybe it even has the correct backplane, but who knows)
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
On May 16, 21:59, Louis Schulman wrote:
> Well, I just got a fabled but seldom seen Exidy Sorcerer. It has a
> power supply problem (including the need to be converted back from 220
> to 110V) but I am working on that.
That should be fairly easy; you just change the transformer connections
inside the case. The 110V setting has two primary windings connected in
parallel to the mains; for 240V the black/red and black/yellow wire would
have been cut at the mains filter and joined together, putting the two
windings in series.
There weren't different units for the two voltages; Exidy literally cut the
wires as I describe above, and joined them together for the European sales.
If it's been set for the "wrong" voltage, it probably has been set for the
wrong vertical sync frequency as well. How you change this depends on
whether it's a Mark I or Mark 2. If it has three rows of DRAM, or sockets
for three rows, it's a Mark 2.
For a Mark I, there are 3 jumper sets on the underside of the PCB, beside
the ICs in positions 3B and 4B. The first set is a pair of square pads
between the rows of pins of 4B; connect them for 60Hz, or disconnect them
for 50Hz. The second set is a group of 3 pads between 4B and 3B. Two are
nearer 4B, one is nearer 3B, and they're arranged in an L shape. Connect
the middle of the L to the other one near 4B for 60Hz; connect the middle
of the L to the one nearer 3B for 50Hz. The last set is the other side of
3B; connect the two pads nearest 3B for 60Hz, connect the one nearest row A
to the one furthest from 3B for 50Hz.
For a Mark 2, it's easier. There's a 4-pole DIP switch at positin 11A on
the top side of the PCB. Switch section 1 off for 60Hz, on for 50Hz.
> The Sorcerer was a contemporary of the Apple II, Commodore Pet and
> TRS-80 Model 1. It was unique in a number of features, including its
> use of an S-100 expansion box. In many respects, it appears to have
> been inspired by the SOL 20.
>
> Info on the web in very sparse. I have nothing but the bare CPU, and
> photocopies of some manuals. I would like any info anyone has
> available, software, manuals, hardware, etc. Will pay good bucks, or
> trade from my vast collection of interesting stuff.
I have the BASIC ROMs, the original monitor ROMs, patched (bugfixed)
monitor ROMs, images of the WP PAC ROMs (anyone got images of the Dev Pac
ROMS? Or a WP PAc manual? I used to have all these...). I have both
Technical Manuals and the Software Manual, the smaller of the two BASIC
manuals, the S100 Expansion Unit Technical Manual, notes on the hardware
bugs (eg the RS232 misdesign on the Mark I, for which I have a fix), and
some expansion options (eg upgrading 32K Mk1 to 48K).
I'm not willing to part with manuals, but I'm happy to lok anything up for
you, and the ROM images and my source code is at
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/ExidyROMs/
I've also got some games and other software (not much, I'm afraid, things
like Breakout, Galaxians, BASIC Toolkit) which aren't on line, but might be
available if you can't find anything elsewhere.
I assume you've found:
http://www.trailingedge.com/exidy/http://www.heydon.org/kevan/collection/manufacturer-exidy/sorcerer.htmlhttp://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~alexios/MACHINE-ROOM/Exidy_Sorcerer.htmlhttp://www.lisp.com.au/~michael/exidy/http://utopia.knoware.nl/users/stuurmn/exidys.htmhttp://www.digidome.nl/exidy.htm
There are some errors in the last two or three pages (for example, it never
used a Z80A, and there was never any version but the 2.1MHz), but still
useful information.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On May 17, 19:55, Louis Schulman wrote:
> Thanks, Peter. This is very helpful. I had figured out reversing the
> serial to parallel wiring, but didn't know about the dip switch
> settings. Mind is obviously the Mark 2.
My original one was, too. However, I sold it in 1982 and the one I have
now is a Mark 1.
Does yours have 48K? It's easy to add extra memory to bring it up to full
spec, but there is a timing problem that affects some boards when you fit
the third bank. I was unlucky and spent days trying to figure out what was
wrong when I bought the extra 8 chips, so eventually I sent it to a
Sorcerer dealer/repeairer and he not only modified it but gave me a diagram
showing the fix.
> Is there some way I could get copies of the manuals?
Not very easily. I don't have access to a scanner at the moment. However,
David Williams has quite a lot on his Trailing Edge website.
> Also, is there
> some way to create a ROM Pack? I really could use the Standard Basic
> ROM pack. Assuming I burn the chip, what else is there to the circuit?
That's not too hard. The Pac consists of a PCB with 4 x 2316 ROMs and a
2-chip decoder circuit, all mounted inside an 8-track tape cartridge shell.
It's perfectly possible to build a replacement using a single 2764 and a
74LS10. With a little care, the bare PCB can be inserted into the
cartridge slot, so you don't even need to cannibalise a "rare" 8-track
cartridge. I have a drawing for such a PCB which I'll put on my website
for you. Look for it at
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/ExidyROMs/ROMPacPCB.ps
Minor caveat: although the date on the file tells me I drew this years ago,
the need to use it went away and I never built a prototype. It should
work, though. There are 17 places to put track pins to connect one side to
the other, two places to put capacitors (a 6V 10mfd tantalum and a 100nF
ceramic), at the end of the 74LS10 location, and both IC locations indicate
pin 1 by a square (instead of oval) pad.
The ROM images are already there, just concatenate them (in order) to make
a 2764.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>I have some vintage books that are surplus to requirements, and are free*
>to any list member who wants to pay shipping. They are:
>
<list snipped>
> E-mail me off-list if
>interested. Take one, take 'em all.
>
Sorry for replying to my own message, but that last line is misleading. I
meant to say: "Take one OR take them all".
You don't have to take all of them. First come, first served.
Mark.
I have some vintage books that are surplus to requirements, and are free*
to any list member who wants to pay shipping. They are:
6809 Assembly Language Programming, by Lance Leventhal (Osborne/McGraw
Hill, 1981)
Motorola MC6809-MC6809E Microprocessor Programming Manual (May 1983
printing)
PL/1 Structured Programming 2nd Ed., by Joan K. Hughes (John Wiley & Sons,
1979)
Structured PL/1 (PL/C) Programming, by Jean Paul Tremblay et al. (McGraw
Hill, 1980)
Structured Programming Using PL/1 and SP/k, by J.N.P. Hume and R.C. Holt
(Reston Publishing Co., 1975)
Computer Programming RPG II, by Gary Shelly and Thomas Cashman (Anaheim
Publishing, 1981)
Comprehensive Structured COBOL, by Gary Popkin (Kent Publishing Co, 1984)
COBOL Programming A Structured Approach 2nd Ed., by Peter Abel (Reston
Publishing, 1984)
VAX Basic, by David Weinman and Barbara Kurshan, (Reston Publishing, 1983)
370/360 Assembler Language Programming, by Nancy Stern et al. (John Wiley &
Sons, 1979)
All are in good, but used, condition. Most were somebody's university
textbooks at one time, so there are some marginal notations.
Shipping is from T2J 5H9 (Calgary, Alberta, Canada). E-mail me off-list if
interested. Take one, take 'em all.
Cheers,
Mark Gregory
* Donations of unneeded Amiga books, magazines, hardware, or software
always gratefully accepted.