Just two random pieces that I've been after for my collection:
#1. Sun Voyager tote bag. The bag the computer goes into.
#2. BeBox front plastic part, and the IO board for a BeBox. Have a dual
66Mhz that is case, PSU and mobo only. Would like to complete it.
Thanks.
--
Ethan O'Toole
Joe - is that the direct connect one of the acoustic coupler? I
any event SMECC would love a copy to for our files at the museum
here.
A side issue there was a Novation coupler - modem... a white one that
the phone would sit on. with coupler cups to the side. Does anyone have
any photos, advertising, etc etc... on this ?
Thanks Ed # _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 9/13/2016 3:32:00 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
fast79ta at yahoo.com writes:
On 9/13/2016 1:58 PM, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> Hi, All,
>
> Good seeing many of you at VCF-midwest. One of my scores was an
> Atari-badged Novation CAT modem. Digging around for any docs, what
> I'm mostly finding is lots of info about Novations Apple II products,
> and scant mention with thumbnail pictures of the original CAT acoustic
> coupler, that and dozens of sites copying the Wikipedia article.
>
> Anyone have any CAT info? I can reverse-engineer the schematic, but
> if that's already been done, no reason for me to redocument the wheel.
> I know it wants a 20VAC 400mA PSU, but I want to check how strict that
> is (i.e., 18VAC @ 500mA or 24 VAC @ 350 mA, for example, which may be
> easier to find than an unregulated 20VAC PSU).
>
> I would love to play with a CBM 8010 (since I have so many PETs) but I
> do happen to have a couple of IEEE-488 to RS-232 devices, which will
> work fine with this Atari 830/Novation CAT.
>
> -ethan
I have the manual for a 103/212 smart cat modem. PN 490418-1/490521-1.
Circa 1982
Is that what you need?
Cheers, Joe
Al - I have had them with 7 and with 9 but never lucky enough to get the
dual headed one... yea... well worth putting online. do you have a link
to any sales info on this? I used to hear of these but never laid eyes
on one. Ed#
In a message dated 9/22/2016 10:32:09 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
aek at bitsavers.org writes:
I'm trying to decide if I want to attempt getting my 7970 with a dual 7/9
track head
running this year.
Hello, made some progress with the pdp 11/34 I picked up a while back.
Managed to repair the faulty power supply. I am in the process of trying to
get a minimal configuration of the machine up and running.
I am looking for a short program to key in to try and test the
functionality of the cpu. Is there anywhere aside from the DEC manuals I
could go to get a quick idea of how to operate the front panel? The manual
is very in depth, however i am looking for sort of a quick start guide to
get started pretty quickly. Any site with info on how to operate the front
panel or some quick short programs i can key in would be of interest.
I almost have the whole machine put back together on my desk, if all goes
well and it runs as expected, i want to post back with some nice orderly
pictures of it in the rack next to all the drives and the tape Drive.
Progress overall with the whole machine has been slow going, the machine
came with a heap of rsx 11 disk packs and tapes, however I am not to the
point where i can use them just yet. Ive been kinda itching to see whats on
those tapes, hopefully soon.
--Devin
Based on the decoding suggested by Christian, I am plodding on but no success so far.
I am not 100% sure that this is M2FM.
>I'd still like to get a 9885/9895/7902 M2FM flux-transition disk
>image, if anyone has one handy that they'd be willing to share.
I will send the image stream to Eric
Denise
________________________________
Dr Denise de Vries BCompInfSc, BSc(Hons), PhD, MACS
Lecturer
Computer Archaeology Laboratory
School of Computer Science, Engineering and Mathematics
Tonsley Building 1
Flinders University
South Road
Tonsley 5042
GPO Box 2100
Adelaide SA 5001
Ph: +61 8 8201 3639 | Fax: +61 8 8201 3602
Room T1 3.24 - Tonsley 1 Building
www.flinders.edu.au/people/denise.devries
CRICOS Provider Number: 00114A
This email and any attachments may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
Hi all,
I have a Norsk Data ND110324 9-track drive which is a rebranded
StorageTek 2920 with SCSI interface. So far I have only found a single
manual for it, a quick guide card of 10 pages.
Is there a manual out there which describes the unit a bit more in
depth, like setting the SCSI address, diagnostic program codes, service,
technical specifications and so on.
So far I have got it to load a tape automatically and detect the
recording density. Next step is to get it to talk to a linux-computer
for imaging some old tapes.
Thanks in advance,
G?ran
I took a look at the Tektronix 4051 that we got a few years back. After
checking the PSU I turned it on and it seemed to start up fine. The machine
responded well to the keypresses but it was hardly readable on the screen.
Anyone that can give advice on what is wrong and how to deal with it. The
text on the screen is very faint and many characters are scrambled as if
the beam was moving when the points where plotted. When typing there is a
flash of the beam which is then stored as the scrambled text.
http://i.imgur.com/iQhQW67.jpg
It probably reads "SYNTAX ERROR" something on the screen.
My experience with DVST device is minimal. I used an old Philips storage
oscilloscope many years ago but I don't remember the screen to be this dull.
It seems like the storage system is not at full output. Unfortunately I am
not getting a good understanding on how the DVST system works from reading
the service manual. What is the purpose of the timers for cursor and
character intensity?
I am about to check all the voltages related to the display mentioned in
the calibration section of the manual, but just in case someone directly
recognize what kind of problem there is I would be much interested.
/Mattis
> From: Devin Davison
> I am looking for a short program to key in to try and test the
> functionality of the cpu.
"BRANCH ." is always a good one - 0777. If that runs, much of the CPU is
functional, and any errors found from there should be pretty easy to track
down.
> Is there anywhere aside from the DEC manuals I could go to get a quick
> idea of how to operate the front panel? The manual is very in depth,
> however i am looking for sort of a quick start guide to get started
> pretty quickly.
I'm assuming you have the 'Programmer's Front Console', the one with the 0-7
number keys, etc? If you have the simple one, instead, that uses a program in
ROM to drive the console serial line, and most of the CPU has to be running to
use that.
The Programmer's Console is pretty simple. Key in the address, hit "LAD"
(Load Address), and then you can read ("EXAM"), store ("DEP" - after entering
the number you want deposit), or start the CPU running at that address (hold
down "CNRTL" and "START"). Hitting "EXAM" multiple times examines successive
locations - "DIS AD" will show you how far it has gotten. If the CPU is
running ("RUN" light is on), pressing down "CNRTL" and "HLT/SS" will halt it.
Load, deposit, etc don't work unless the CPU is halted.
Noel
A Signetics PLS173 PLA has a total of 2178 programmable fuses:
(32 AND gates for logic terms plus 10 AND gates for control terms)
times
(24 true/complement inputs plus 20 true/complement inputs/outputs)
= 1848 fuses
(10 OR gates)
times
(32 AND gates logic term outputs)
= 320 fuses
10 fuses for true/complement output selection
For reference see the PLS173 FPLA Logic Diagram on page 5-70 (page 242
of the PDF) of the Signetics PLD Data Manual 1987
http://www.bitsavers.org/_dataBooks/1987_Signetics_pldData.pdf
The question is for anyone here that knows: How are these fuses in the
FPLA Logic Diagram numbered as they would be in a JEDEC fuse map file
used to program a device, or when read back from a device? I can't
find that information anywhere.
If I read a PLS173 device into a JEDEC fuse map it should be trivial
to generate the logic equations by hand if the fuse numbering is
known, which is what I want to do.
I'm cleaning out my library of manuals and books I no longer need and
before I recycle these particular IBM manuals, I thought someone on
cctalk might find them useful. They are free for the shipping and
packaging cost - local pickup gets priority ;)
1) "RS/6000 Diagnostic Information for Multiple Bus Systems" (Version
5.100)
2) "RS/6000 Adapters, Devices and Cable Information for Multiple Bus
Systems"
3) Large 8.5" X 11" "Systems Network Architecture, Reference Summary"
(Updated to 2/4/86). Includes "IBM Synchronous Data Link Control General
Information" manual.
4) 8.5" X 11: "Systems Network Architecture, Transaction Programmer's
Reference Manual for LU Type 6.2"
Cheers,
Lyle
--
73 AF6WS
Bickley Consulting West Inc.
http://bickleywest.com
"Black holes are where God is dividing by zero"
I'm not sure that I'm comfortable asking this, but here goes....
I ran into the famous Michael Holley (www.swtpc.com) at VCF West and had a
pleasant conversation. I've emailed him several times at the address on his
web page, but haven't had a reply. I'm wondering if he ever hangs out on
cctech and if not, if there is someone that knows of a different email and
could let him know that I would like to chat with him.
Hi,
As per the subject, I'm wondering if anyone has a spare MXV11 that they would be willing to part with.
It's going in 2x4 (H9281) enclosure, where I'm currently losing two slots to a mem card and a DLV11-J.
I would prefer the -BF version, so I can run either my 11/23 or the 11/73 processor card in there,
but the -A version will do in a pinch. Boot ROM's would also be nice, but not a hard requirement...
Please let me know off-list. I am in the Pacific Northwest if that makes a difference to anyone...
cheers
--
alex
Hi all --
I have a VAX 8250 I'm bringing up and I'd like to track down an Ethernet
adapter, this would be the T1034 (DEBNT). There are a few on eBay, but
none include the cabling and bulkhead, which would be nice to have.
I'm also looking for a T1010 (BI to Unibus adapter), as the one in my
system is shot (and given the lack of documentation, I doubt I'm going to
be able to fix it).
Also -- any suggestions for mass storage? I have a KDB50 (T1002, T1003
set), but SDI drives are getting harder to find. I assume VAXBI SCSI
adapters are even more scarce than their Unibus counterparts....
Thanks as always,
Josh
Gentlemen,
I was rooting through the morgue this morning looking for a cable to
revive my AlphaServer 4100 when I stumbled over my long moribund
DEC 3000.
This machine was retired because some of the memory failed and, although
it is too large and heavy to ship, there are a lot of parts and
accessories that may be of use including the strange little cable that had
a connector block for the mouse and keyboard and an adaptor that I
obtained from DEC which allows you to use a VGA monitor instead of the
original Trinitron with its array of BNC cables. I also have an array of
documentation and (good grief!) the original mouse.
Anybody want any DEC 3000 parts?
Or a couple of ES45 CPU cards? I have two those also.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
The third release of the HP 3000 Series III simulator is now available from
the Computer History Simulation Project (SIMH) site:
https://github.com/simh/simh
This release adds the cold dump facility. Entering the DUMP command
simulates pressing the ENABLE and DUMP front panel buttons. The contents
of main memory are written to an attached magnetic tape in a format
suitable for analyzing with the DPAN4 program provided with MPE. The new
SET CPU DUMPDEV and SET CPU DUMPCTL options specify the default device
number and control byte for the dump.
Also, the user may simulate a system power loss with the POWER FAIL command
and resume powered operation with the POWER RESTORE command. The SET CPU
ARS/NOARS command determines whether or not MPE automatically restarts when
power is restored.
The full set of new features is listed in the release notes that accompany
the simulator source files. In addition, an updated HP 3000 Simulator
User's Guide that covers the new commands is provided in Microsoft Word
format with the source download and also as a PDF file at:
http://alum.mit.edu/www/jdbryan/hp3000_doc.pdf
The preconfigured MPE-V/R disc image available from Bitsavers:
http://www.bitsavers.org/bits/HP/HP_3000/
...was not changed for this release.
-- Dave
So the DSD-440 I got at VCF is completely unresponsive. All of the LEDs are on and never go out, which is bizarre - they are supposed to go out in 1/10 of a second after power on.
I tried disconnecting everything but power to the card, and it still lights all LEDs. No jumpers that I could find are in the wrong spot, but many are seemingly undocumented ( I looked in both the 1981 user manual and 1984 service manual on Bitsavers).
The drive just spins and does nothing else. Altering the switches on the control board do nothing to change the state of the LEDs.
I measured voltages at the power supply, and they seem to be within spec according to the manual.
Are there any other things I can try before I start digging into things on a component level?
> From: jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu
> Subject: Value of 7-track TU10
>
> So what do people think the (monetary) value of a 7-track TU10 master drive
> is? I have no idea what these older vacuum-column drives are worth - don't
> recall ever seeing on for sale. This one is in good condition, and has all its
> Flip Chips. The 7-track is a plus in some ways (rarer), and negative in
> others (can't read old 9-track tapes, which are probably more common than
> 7-track).
>
> Noel
Noel,
The TU10 would be a great addition to the PDP-9 at the RICM.
The RICM is a 501(c)(3) entity so you get a tax deduction for a donation.
I just wanted to say a huge thanks to Jason and crew for putting on an
incredible event last weekend. Last year was fantastic, and this year the
bar was raised again in every area.
To my eye, attendance was up this year yet again.
There was plenty of rich toasty mini goodness, including a Prime 5300 and a
Vax 6000 - and a bevy of pdp8 and pdp11 displays.
The touch screen 11/70? Front panel connected to emulation was awesome!
Someone was displaying some of Rod's front panels. incredible work Rod!
The auction had far more goodies this year, including plenty of "big iron"
that I'm sure is getting new blood into the hobby.
The speakers also took things up a notch, I can't wait to see the roster for
next year.
I was pretty focused on Dennis's Prime the whole show, so I didn't get to
really go around to every exhibit. I'm sure I missed some quality displays.
I saw new people actively getting into the hobby, and I noticed quite a few
listmembers and irc #classiccmp peeps that had never been to vcfmw before
showed up this year.
The larger space (and other amenities) over the previous venue were fully
used. We may need even more space next year.
It was an incredible show, of course I will be there next year, and hats off
to Jason for all the hard work he put in to making it a success.
Best,
J
> From: Paul Anderson
> A 9 can be converted to a 7 with a head change and I thing a board
> change or removal.
Yeah, the M768 module contains configurable diode arrays to control certain
operational delays, which are different between the two - one can either
change out the M768, or modify the existing one by adding/removing jumpers.
> I recall having a TU10 7 track here somewhere.
If it turns up, maybe someone with a 9-track drive could convert it to
7-track.
Noel
> From: William Degnan
> I found the doc somewhere months ago sorry I can't remember where. I
> will upload to my site if I get a free moment and it's still on my
> computer.
Thanks; that would be great. I already did find online the TU10 Maintenance
Manual (EK-TU10-MM-007), the TU10M Master System Manual (DEC-00-TU10M-D), and
the TU10 Engineering Drawings, so we're pretty well set for these drives, but
it would be good to have DEC-00-TU10S-DC too.
> $2000 if clean.
Wow. I saw a pair of H960's, a pair of CDC 92185 tape drives, 3 Fuji
MiniEagles and an 11/23 go for $1.5K on eBait recently:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/161928600660
Now, those are streaming drives, not vacuum column, but still - why is the
TU10 worth so much more?
> Master unit double that price.
I find this even harder to understand. The only difference between the two is
that the Master has 7 dual Flip Chips (M640, M891, M7673, M7672, M892, M895,
M7671) and 3 single Flip Chips (M100, M896, M958) that the Slave doesn't have.
(The backplane is, as far as I can tell, wired for both - the wire list given
in the prints is for the master, and I don't see a second Slave-only
wire-list. Yes, perhaps some early Slave drives had a Slave-only backplane,
but that's just a guess. If someone who has a Slave drive can check their
backplane to see if slots 6-15 are wired, that would be very useful to know.)
Yes, the full set of 10 Flips Chips would be hard to find, but I have a hard
time seeing them being worth $200 each...
Noel
So what do people think the (monetary) value of a 7-track TU10 master drive
is? I have no idea what these older vacuum-column drives are worth - don't
recall ever seeing on for sale. This one is in good condition, and has all its
Flip Chips. The 7-track is a plus in some ways (rarer), and negative in
others (can't read old 9-track tapes, which are probably more common than
7-track).
Noel
Hi list,
VCF Berlin[0] is coming soon! We'll have a day open only for
participants and other collectors on Saturday, 1st of October. On
Sunday, 2nd and Monday, 3rd of October we'll be open to the general
public (3rd of October is a holiday in Germany). Entry is free on all
days. Apart from exhibitions there will be lectures, soldering
workshops, a chiptune party and many other things. Come and visit us!
Sorry this reminder is so late, I was hoping for the English version of
the website to get updated, which hasn't happened yet. Please refer to a
translation[1] of the German version for more information instead.
Although all but one talk will be given in German, most of the
exhibitors can speak English, so VCFB is worth a visit even if you don't
speak any German. In case you need somewhere to stay, we can probably
find a place for you.
Hope to see you at VCFB!
Best, Anke
[0] http://vcfb.de/2016/index.html.en
[1] https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://vcfb.de/2016/index.html
> From: Doug Ingraham
> Put it up on EBAY with an unrealistic reserve ... What controller do
> you have for it?
None. I don't own either the drive, or a controller for it.
Noel
> From: William Degnan
>> a 7-track TU10 master
> What is the model number of the TU10?
The serial number plate just says "TU10"; and it's not in its original DEC
rack, so any label/plate there is no longer available. But the front door
says "TU10 7 CHANNEL", and the head shows 7 tracks (since someone might have
changed the head, and not been able to replace the door).
> The presence of the TU10M label along with a separate TU10 label plate
> means the tape has the the master transport unit installed.
I prefer to actually check the Flip Chips, since one ought to do that anyway
to make sure they are all there (hence my previous description of it as a
"TU10 master drive ... [which] has all its Flip Chips"). (There's a list here:
http://gunkies.org/wiki/TU10
including locations, if anyone ever needs it.)
> Hopefully this will compare with the unit you're interested in and
> assist with your assessment.
I am perfectly capable of assessing the technical situation from the technical
documentation (which is available), and have already done so.
What I really need is some idea of its value (I haven't a clue). I am aware
that its exact configuration and condition will affect the value, but I
thought "a 7-track TU10 master drive .. in good condition, [with] all its Flip
Chips" would be enough to get to the ball-park.
> See DEC-00-TU10S-DC
I had previously looked online for that, but was unable to find a copy. Can
you point me at one? Thanks.
> more diffs 7 vs, 9 track
AFAICT, the only significant difference is the head; the Flip Chip suite is
the same for both, since the per-channel boards are all 9-track, and simply
leave the last two bits disconnected when used with a 7-track head (see e.g.
drawing # TU10-0-09, note "9 Track Only").
Of course, the drive has to be able to say (to the controller) whether it's a
7-track or 9-track. Drawing # TU10-0-07 shows (center) an incoming signal on
pin AJ1 of the M514 board (slot 21) called "7 CH", that signal is intended to
ground the input, so there's a jumper to ground on the backplane to indicate
7/9 (A21C2, per the MM, Appendix A.5).
Noel
> From: William Degnan
>> the (monetary) value of a 7-track TU10 master drive
^^^^^^
> Is there a thread with more details?
No.
> I assume this is a master drive
See above.
> the cards installed indicate whether it came from a pdp 8/9/10/11.
AFAIK, all PDP-10 TU10's are Slaves. TU10's used on an -11 need a Master and
Slaves, I don't know if the ones for an -8 are the same. The TU10 prints
don't seem to indicate that there is more than one type of Slaveax, and
similarly for the Masters - there is just the one type of each.
This one is from an -11, though.
> How is the power supply?
No idea. And no idea about the condition of the motors, compressor, etc, etc,
etc. Like I said, this one "is in good condition", from a purely external
inspection.
Noel
Linux at 25 - created 25 years ago. Has it changed computing or is it
'better' than WIN or MacOS? Not really part of classic computing world
but nonetheless it can be used today in emulators. ( I use it for ADAM
emulating. )
Happy computing!
Murray :)
I am getting 3 of these ready for sale, and all but 1 of the online pics I
see of the boards do NOT have a PA3 or a NumLock key.
Does anyone here have a good high res pic of these 2 complete keyboards, so
that I can know what is supposed to be on there?
Many thanks!
Cindy Croxton
On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Al Kossow wrote:
> Put it this way. The product manager for the cube was the first person
> I know of who had one as a kleenex dispenser. It was a failed industrial
> design experiment that never should have shipped and even he felt that
> way.
And now they have the mac pro which looks like a very elegant $3,000.00
can of tomato juice. Not much changes.
Meanwhile, I am on my second mac Mini (third if you count my wife's)
because i really like the mac mini so I probably would have bought the
cube if I had been in the market for a mac at that time.
--
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS : "...underneath those
Athabasca University : tuques we wear, our
Athabasca, Alberta Canada : heads are naked!"
** rlloken at telus.net ** : - Arthur Black
> So what are the other options?
> * Trying to repair the unit. Every plane is soldered together with the ones
> nearby to convey the X/Y signals. This can probably be undone with a
> patience and soldering braid. But what are the chance that the X/Y wires
> gets lose then? Are those soldered or welded into place?
>
> Then it would be quite tricky to just identify where it is actually broken.
> Any ideas for how to do this? A microscope of course. Any other ideas?
> Applying an electrical field between the wire and something else and try to
> detect it?
A stereoscopic microscope and a lot of patience is a good staring point.
> Repair. If the wire is broken in the mat it is probably not to difficult to
> pull out the broken parts. But then the new wire has to be spliced in. What
> is t he best technique to do that?
> How to push in the new wire in the matrix? I now that Anders was able to do
> this with a broken X-wire in a PDP-8/L stack.
I used a pair of tweezers to push the new thread in, one core at a time.
You should try to change as small part as possible. I just changed the
thread thru the first 64 cores, then I joined the two threads together
in the middle of the core plan. I then used nail polish as an isolatur.
I didn't thought I had something to lose to try to repair the existing
core stack. Without it the computer is really not working at all. I'll
think you should try to repair it. Start to bring out the core stack
and then turn it around for a while until you are brave enough.
I found some pictures on stacks to the 8/L in pieces before I started on
the internet, that helped me to understand what I had to master.
/Anders
Is there engineering drawings online for the DEC 871 or 874 power
controllers?
I have one with a failed solid state relay and I cannot figure out the spec.
One is an Opto-Film OFA-2402H and the other is a CLARE 203A05A3A
But I cannot find a data sheet for any of those. Does anyone know a
compatible replacement device? The pinout is not something I can find
amongst the ones at Mouser.
/Mattis
I am finally getting recovered from my trip to VCFMW... the 2-day
(basically non-stop) drive each way was somewhat taxing. And I too
wanted to say thanks to everyone who attended along with Jason and crew
who made it happen.
This was my first VCFMW and the spirit and camaraderie at the whole
event reminded me very much of the early VCF events. It was a pleasant
surprise to find it a lot larger than what I expected. I got the
opportunity to renew old acquaintances, put faces with people I only
knew by name, and make a number of new friends. The big bonus for me was
reducing the amount of unneeded "stuff" and having the trip pay for
itself! (It could have all disappeared and would not have made a dent it
the stuff here at the house.)
And like Jay, I already have my reservations in for next year.
Many thanks to everyone who attended and made it happen!!!
Marvin, KE6HTS
> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:17:52 -0500 From: "Jay West"
> <jwest at classiccmp.org>
>
> I just wanted to say a huge thanks to Jason and crew for putting on
> an incredible event last weekend. Last year was fantastic, and this
> year the bar was raised again in every area.
> From: Guy Sotomayor Jr
> Why? What does the width of the ALU have to do with the "bitness" of
> the architecture? If the programmer's view is 8-bits .., what does it
> matter (other than performance) what the width of the internal data
> paths or ALU are?
> It's interesting from an implementation point of view but not really
> anything else.
What he said (and others made the same point).
When talking about processors, "Architecture" = 'what the programmer sees'.
> From: Fred Cisin
> There are more than a hundred different parameters involved. There is
> no definitive agreement as to which parameter is to be used for the
> classification, nor even which parameterS. ... a product that has one
> classification by one parameter, and a different classification by
> another parameter, there will be disputed classifications, since
> different parameters are more or less important to each viewer.
And this too.
(Which is why, for the 68K, I listed several of the main user-visible
parameters, and noted that they were all 32 bits.)
Noel
Christian, Thanks for those links1
Yes the packard bell wegge corner computer
I actually need one of those for a display here....
ed sharpe archivist for smecc _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 9/17/2016 8:25:46 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
captainkirk359 at gmail.com writes:
On 17 September 2016 at 01:38, <COURYHOUSE at aol.com> wrote:
> look at both these HP desktops - style come to the computer!
>
If we're going to talk about "modern" computers... I'd like to direct
the list to these YouTube videos by Clint, of the Lazy Game Reviews
channel (is he on this list?):
"Strangest Computer Designs of the '90s": <https://youtu.be/rqyoO4eajXo>
"Strangest Computer Designs of the 2000s": <https://youtu.be/fQEOvLeLfTw>
There's also actual classic computer stuff on his channel too. Here's
an example of him talking about his IBM 5160 PC/XT:
<https://youtu.be/VfvGS7qJr4M>
Cheers,
Christian
--
Christian M. Gauger-Cosgrove
STCKON08DS0
Contact information available upon request.
Hi, All,
I unearthed what appears to be a Tektronix X terminal, marked on the bottom:
MODEL: X221CHT
SERIAL: <serial number>
LAN: 08 00 11 <xx> <xx> <xx>
KEY: <17 digit alphanumeric>
The connectors on the back are:
8-pin DIN marked +5VDC/+12VDC
PS/2 Mouse
PS/2 Keyboard
15-pin VGA
2x DE9-M serial
"RJ45" Ethernet
10Base2 BNC
several empty rectangular openings presumable for expansion mods
Inside is:
Sonic-T DP83934CVUL-25
TI TLC34076-135FN Video
SRAM
LSI LR33020MC-25 "GRAPHX PROC"
Tektronix 160-9461-00
29F010 FLASH EEPROM
2x 72-pin SIMM sockets with on SIMM installed, appears to be 4MB
Chip dates are frequently last 60 days of 1996. Two minor SOIC parts
have the newest visible date code, 9701.
I do not have the PSU for it and have not tried powering it on. I can
probably solder some wires to the back of the PCB to feed it +12V and
+5V, but I'm a little surprised to find zero information on the web
searching for variants of the vendor and model number.
Anyone here have any info? If it is an X terminal, it's probably a
brick without a somewhat sizable tftp area for it to slurp up.
Thanks for any tips, comments or pointers.
-ethan
> From: Al Kossow
> done.
Thanks!
I've spent a while poring over them, and I can report that the tape interface
on the TMA11 and TMB11 is exactly identical. (Oddly enough, there are very
minor differences between those of the TM11 and TMA11. Go figure.) So I
expect that report of a TU10 plugged into a TMB11 is accurate.
I've also compared the TM11 and TMA11, and they have the ssme complement of
Flip Chips, with one exception: the TMA11 adds an M7854 "OPI/BTE Detector" -
not sure what that might be. It does not seem to be, as I had guessed, for
support of 1600 bpi, because the TMA11 only supports 800.
I'll put together a brief page on the Computer History wiki containing all
i've gleaned covering the TM11/TMA11/TMB11 (pinouts of the drive cable, Flip
Chip backplane chart, etc).
Noel
For 2.11BSD on the PDP-11, in the stand alone utilities that are found on
the installation tape, the storage devices are named:
dn(x,y,z) where dn is the mnemonic for the driver, x is the controller
number, y is the unit number and z is the partition on the unit. So the
first partition on the first drive on the first MSCP controller is
ra(0,0,0). It's fairly easy form the install tape to disklabel and mkfs a
drive on a second controller.
Once UNIX is running, things change. The devices in /dev are named ra0 for
the first unit on the first controller, ra1 for the second unit on the
first controller and etc. I don't see a way in the naming convention to
identify other controllers.
My question is, what is the device name in /dev for the first drive on the
second controller?
Op 15 sep. 2016 11:57 p.m. schreef "Toby Thain" <toby at telegraphics.com.au>:
>
> On 2016-09-15 2:38 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>>
>> > From: Chuck Guzis
>>
>> > Call it anything you want, but we know what Motorola called it.
>>
>> The _first implementation_ may have been 16-bit, but I am in no doubt
>> whatsover (having written a lot of assembler code for the 68K family)
>> that the _architecture_ was 32-bit:
>>
>> - 32-bit registers
>> - many operations (arithmetical, logical, etc) defined for that length
>> - 32-bit addresses
>
>
> GPR width, being the visible programmer model, is the most common and
convenient definition of "architecture" I've come across. But there's no
reason we can't just say the *visible* architecture is 32 bit (which it
is), but the "internal" architecture is sort of 16.
Afaik, the term computer architecture was coined for the IBM 360, which was
a 32-bit architecture, with 8, 16, 32, and 64 bit implementations. The term
architecture specifically refers to what the programmer sees, not to the
specifics of an implementation.
Camiel
Hi folks,
I recently acquired a DSD-440 drive and purchased its accompanying controller on ebay. The controller is configured at defaults according to the manual on Bitsavers. However, unless it is on the bus by itself after the RAM cards, it halts the CPU at location 270.
Here are the 4 card configurations I tried, < or > denotes direction of serpentine QBus:
Doesn't work:
1 CPU - CPU - CPU - CPU >
2 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM <
3 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM >
4 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM <
5 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM >
6 DSD - DSD - RAM - RAM <
7 UC07-UC07- --DEQNA-- >
8 --- - --- - --- - --- - --- <
9 --- - --- - --- - --- - --- >
OR
1 CPU - CPU - CPU - CPU >
2 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM <
3 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM >
4 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM <
5 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM >
6 RAM - RAM - --- - --- <
7 DSD - DSD - --- - --- >
8 UC07-UC07- --DEQNA-- <
9 --- - --- - --- - --- - --- >
Works (or at least leaves the CPU in the "RUN" state):
1 CPU - CPU - CPU - CPU >
2 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM <
3 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM >
4 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM <
5 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM >
6 DSD - DSD - RAM - RAM <
7 --- - --- - --- - --- - --- >
8 --- - --- - --- - --- - --- <
9 --- - --- - --- - --- - --- >
OR
1 CPU - CPU - CPU - CPU >
2 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM <
3 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM >
4 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM <
5 RAM - RAM - RAM - RAM >
6 RAM - RAM - --- - --- <
7 DSD - DSD - --- - --- >
8 --- - --- - --- - --- - --- <
9 --- - --- - --- - --- - --- >
The card says (C)1978 Data Systems Design on it, and the latest manual is (C)1980 - which makes me concerned this is an 18-bit only QBus card.
I have not yet tried attaching the drive box to the card, thinking it would at least see the controller without hanging. The box isn't yet clean and ready to go.
Any help with this card would be appreciated. Am I doing something wrong, or is this just a bad card?
Thanks
Julian
> From: Al Kossow
> http://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/102753063
Ah, excellent! Any chance those can be scanned at some point?
(No rush, I'm not about to start working with one instantly - too much else
backed up in the queue! :-)
>> I saw some queries about whether a TU10 could be connected to a TMB11.
>> The answer is apparently 'yes', for two reasons:
>> First, I found docs on a thing called a TMA11 (apparently intermediate
>> between the TM11 and TMB11), and one version of the docmentation about
>> it talks about the TMA11 and the TU10, but another version talks about
>> the TMA11 and the TS03. So, by transitivity, if the TU10 works with a
>> TMA11, and a TMA11 works with a TS03, and the TS03 works with a TMB11,
>> the TMB11 must work with a TU10...
>> Second, I have a report of a TU10 found plugged into a TMB11 in a
>> retired computer.
> the TMB11 is a special widget for the small Kennedy 7" 800bpi tape drive
That's the TS03, right?
Anyway, there are indications (above) that it will also work with a TU10. If
the TMB11 prints get scanned in, I can take a look them, and see what gives.
Further (third) clue: the TMB11 Ops manual says "The TS03 tape transport
operates at only one density (800 bpi) and iin only one mode of operation (9
track). The TMB11 is capable of other densities and can operate in the
7-track .. modes." I expect this is to support these modes in the TU10...
I originally thought the TB11 was TS03-specific, but after reviewing all the
above, I have changed my mind. Having the drawings would be great; I could
check them out to confirm that it really can drive a TU10.
> we do have the TMA11 drwngs
Also excellent! The TM11 ones are online, but not (AFAIK) the TMA11. So if
that could get done at some point, too... :-)
The two are very similar (a 19" rack backplane full of smaller FLIP CHIPs),
so it's not like the RK11-C -> RK11-D, where they re-implemented it to make
it cheaper. I'm _guessing_ the latter one can handle 1600 bpi, or some such,
but with the prints, the difference could be confirmed.
> From: Henk Gooijen
> IIRC, I have the printset of the TMB11 and ISTR it is one inch thick!
Hmm. No idea why - it's only a quad card and a hex card and 4 smaller
standard UNIBUS FLIP CHIPs (M105, M7821, etc). Hard to see that generating 1"
of paper (even with the wire list for the custom backplane - a hex-high
system unit).
Maybe that set includes the TS03 drawings too?
Noel
Does anyone know of the whereabouts of a set of engineering drawings for the
TMB11 (also a Technical Manual, although that's more of a luxury)? All I could
find on it, online, was the Operator's Manual.
Noel
PS: In an older thread on TU10's/TM11's here:
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/2015-September/011810.html
I saw some queries about whether a TU10 could be connected to a TMB11. The
answer is apparently 'yes', for two reasons:
First, I found docs on a thing called a TMA11 (apparently intermediate between
the TM11 and TMB11), and one version of the docmentation about it talks about
the TMA11 and the TU10, but another version talks about the TMA11 and the
TS03. So, by transitivity, if the TU10 works with a TMA11, and a TMA11 works
with a TS03, and the TS03 works with a TMB11, the TMB11 must work with a
TU10...
Second, I have a report of a TU10 found plugged into a TMB11 in a retired
computer.
There were a couple more MIPS workstations (with MIPS property tags) at Weird Stuff a couple days ago. Two 3xxx-series and an R/12.
Also a bunch of DEC stuff including a VT240 base and several keyboards.
-- Chris
Sent from my iPhone
A bit off topic other than tips for anyone else trying to travel cheaply. I
have a trip to California in a month although the final destination isn't
San Jose.
I can fly in to SJC and Google is sounding like I might be able to get a
few bus hops from the airport and find my way there? Any tips, tricks or
warnings?
*(more off-topic below, feel free to stop above for helping anyone venture
around to CHM).
No idea if I'm testing my luck neighborhood wise and debating taking a bus
or train from Mountain view to Pasadena after my free day.
Feel free to email me offline if this is too far from list interest. Mostly
if anyone was to benefit it would be what's the cheapest route to spend a
day at the CHM and then return to the airport again.
- John
From: Dale H. Cook
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 9:52 AM
> Please do not change the subject line in a thread. The subject line of
> this thread has been changed twice since it began as "68K Macs with MacOS
> 7.5 still in production use..." When you change a subject line the header
> information concerning the subject is unchanged, and that is what the
> list archives and some email clients go by. There are now three threads
> concerning different subjects archived as one thread at classiccmp.org.
> If you want to change a subject please start a new thread, and if you
> wish you can give the new thread a subject line such as "New Subject (was
> Old Subject)" to reflect its origin.
Actually, Mr. Cook, the standard for the last 35 years or so has been to
change the subject line, with the old subject in SQUARE BRACKETS with the
characters "was: " prepended. Any decent newsreader or threading mail
reader knows how to deal with that, and threading is unbroken. What was
broken in the messages about which you complain is the substitution of
parentheses () for brackets [].
See the subject line on this message for an example.
Rich
Rich Alderson
Vintage Computing Sr. Systems Engineer
Living Computer Museum
2245 1st Avenue S
Seattle, WA 98134
mailto:RichA at LivingComputerMuseum.orghttp://www.LivingComputerMuseum.org/
On 09/14/16 09:52, Dale H. Cook wrote:
>
> Please do not change the subject line in a thread. The subject line
> of this thread has been changed twice since it began as "68K Macs
> with MacOS 7.5 still in production use..." When you change a subject
> line the header information concerning the subject is unchanged,
> and that is what the list archives and some email clients go by.
> There are now three threads concerning different subjects archived
> as one thread at classiccmp.org.
And what's so horrible about that? I miss entire conversations because
somebody starts discussing something I *would* find interesting under a
misleading Subject: and never changes it. Oh well - people will do what
they do, thank goodness for search...
How do you justify making everybody conform to your preferred behavior?
Even though I did what you wanted in this reply/new topic. ;) But now
nobody can see what I didn't quote from your original message without
going off and running a search - isn't that annoying too?
--S.