Anyone on-list running an 11/45? Intercepted these dumpster-bound
goodies. As before, you pay postage.
(also listed some printer docs left over from last weeks giveaway)
- KT11-C memory management unit manual
- KT11-C engineering drawings
- KB11-A (11/45) CPU Maint. Manual
- PDP11/45 system engineering drawings
- LPV11 (M8027) Printer I/F users manual
- LPV11-V (M8027) Field Maint. Print Set
- LP11 line printer manual
- LP11/LS11/LA11 line printer manual
- Dataproducts 2230 (LP05) Tech manual
- Dataproducts 2230 Logic Diagrams
Enjoy,
..... nick o
In a message dated 6/8/01 10:35:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, jss(a)ou.edu
writes:
>
> (3) They may just assume you are running a business, and your only
> violation would be having a business in a residential zone. That
> should be easy to disprove.
>
AFAIAC According to general US law *they* would have to *prove* that you
*are* running a business. You do't have to prove you are not. By the way, as
mentioned before I would have them both prosecuted for tresspassing and
invasion of privacy.
-Linc Fessenden
In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.
Geez...just when you think you've heard it all. This is taking those
neighborhood zoning restrictions a bit too far. Obviously, the neighbor has
too much time on their hands. Good luck getting it worked out Mike.
Jeff
>I am so steamed right now, buried in my junk mail I just found a letter
>from the city of Orange where I live. (peoples republic of California)
>
>Notice of violation and order to comply
>* Storage of computer and parts in the residential area
>
>Apparently some neighbor had a inspector come over and peek in my windows
>last week, and sure enough I do have a few computers stacked around right
>now. The gist of the complaint is that while I comply with all the noise,
>parking, etc. they want me to have a "Home Occupation Business License" and
>restrict my storage to 500 cubic feet in an enclosed garage.
>
>Now I guess I have to agree the home is occupied with computers, but my
>first reaction is that it is strictly a hobby, no business activity goes on
>at all. Before I say anything though I am going to go and read Orange
>Municipal Code 17.14.050(H) in the morning.
>
>I love the arrogance of these people too, giving me 14 days to comply. My
>guess is that at best this will be a big PITA, since it kind of hamstrings
>me, if I sell off a bunch of stuff, then I am a business, but if I don't
>then I may be looking at endless harassment.
Does anyone have any docs or software on the Overland Data model OD3201
9-track? It has what I beleive a Serial and a Pertec interface. It does
1600 and 3200 BPI. A quick Internet search came up dry.
Thanks,
Brian.
> > Or in California where the damned ground won't hold still . . .:^)
>
> Just a rant, but this whole perception of California being this constantly
> roiling land mass is silly.
>
> When you consider that the east coast has on average at least one
> hurricane every year like clockwork (and sometimes a majorly devastating
> one), and that the midwest has dozens of tornados (some catastrophic), and
> the Atlantic and northeast have terrible weather almost year round, I'll
> take the occasional major earthquake every decade or two over all that
> nonsense any day (and enjoy the great weather to boot).
I would say that good thing there's a place for everyone, but I'll
probably never find a mix of weather, economy, and culture I can
really live with. For weather, I want winters with three months
continual snow cover; I want the economy of the Midwest, were I
live, and the culture of New York City.
Oh, and proximity to gobs and gobs of Classic Computers...
-dq
You might think that living in a rural area with 5 acres
of woodland around you would protect you from this kind
of crud, but don't hold your breath.... There's still
the insurance company to deal with.
My adventure started when a tree took out my front porch
during a storm. I made the dreaded mistake of actually
trying to _use_ the policy that I had been paying on
for 8 years. The company paid up, but a month later I
received a letter from the insurance company informing
me that my policy was being canceled due to the use of
my home as a "storage facility". I argued with the company
for a bit and got them to agree to re-evaluate there
decision. What they did was to send out a wet-behind-the-ears
inspector who then proceeded to tell me that the company
_might_ re-instate my policy if I (1) replaced my roof (it was
fine, by the way), (2) re-side my house with vinyl
(3) Remove the 2 lawn mowers from my yard (remember, I live
in the middle of 5 acres of woodland with no neighbors and
a 1200 foot dirt driveway) and worst of all, remove all
the (and I quote) "Useless electronic junk" from my home.
I asked him what he considered acceptable, and he responded
with all the rightous arrogance that only the very young
and newly powerful can have that one, or at the most two
computers would be acceptable, as long as they were small
desktops. Needless to say, I asked him to leave.
The story does have a happy ending though. I contacted
the insurance company one last time and told them that
I was going to complain to the state insurance commisioner.
They told me to go ahead... the insurance comissioner never
forced them to recend any of their decisions, and was
merely a "rubber-stamp" organization.
I then proceeded to call the insurance commisioners office.
While talking to the nice lady on the phone, I repeated
verbatim what the insurance company official had said to me.
The conversation went like this:
"She said WHAT about us?"
<I repeated the insurance company's statements>
"Oh really?... And what was her name"
<I provided the details>
"Hmm... well, they might feel that way, but I ASSURE
you that we are NOT a rubber-stamp organization..."
A few days later I received a letter from the Insurance
Commisioner's office stating that my Insurance company had
illegally cancelled my policy and had been ordered to
re-instate it. (This seemed to amaze my independent
insurance agent... I guess it was a pretty rare occurance)
Needless to say, as soon as the policy was re-instated
I cancelled it myself and changed to another company, but
At least I got some satisfaction out of the mess.
Moral of the story... If a tree falls in the forest on
your deck, make certain the insurace company doesn't
hear it :)
-al-
> The DN10000 also had a maximum of 4, not 8 processors... There weren't any
> actual Apollo products that used the 88K, I guess I could call one of the
> founders of Apollo and ask him, but I'm really sure on this one.
I knew it was *some* power of two...
> Seen your bill lately? What do they call that?
Yeah-
I discontinued caller ID, call waiting, etc, back
in December. They wwere pretty quicky about turning
them off. However, they haven't yet billing know
about it...
We do it to them, it's stealing... they do it to us,
it's " a mistake".
Grr.
Joel:
Can't tell much from the first 128 bytes.
It looks like a "boot loader" program.
I have a similar program that loads Altair Basic from my paper tape reader.
How many bytes total are in the ROM ?
The jumps at the beginning go to interupt handlers for hardare generated interupts.
Follow those to the code they point to.
Unfortunately, I forgot what the standard interupt numbers (and what they did) were.
What external peripherals (paper tape reader, teletype, etc.) does it have ?
-Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Weder [SMTP:jweder@telusplanet.com]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 11:46 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: IMSAI EPROMS
Hi all...
I've been trying to get some action from this IMSAI for awhile now. Main
problem is I don't know what is on the EPROMs on the EconoROM board. It
looks like banks A & B, OR banks C & D, can be enabled together starting at
address 0000h. There are 6 2708's in A0 through B1, and 8 2708's in C0
through C3.
I've been looking for an EPROM burner that can read/write 2708's with no
luck so far. We have TWO machines at work, and neither will do it. Anyone
know of a burner that WILL?
I manually read the first 256 bytes of the first chip, and disassembled it,
also manually - I'm looking for a good disassembler program too! I've got
one called DASM V1.2 by John Wilson, but have been having some trouble with
it.
If you've got a few minutes, have a look at what I've included below - the
first 128 bytes of code. Let me know if any of it looks familiar. (Or if I
messed up the job!) The comments are for my own benefit - I'm pretty rusty
with assembler.
Addr. Hex Value Mnemonic Comments
0000 AF XRA A ;Exclusive Or A with A (clears A)
0001 C3 3B 00 JMP 003B ;Jump to 003Bh
0008 C3 EE EF JMP FFEE ;Jump to FFEEh
0010 C3 F1 FF JMP FFF1 ;Jump to FFF1h
0018 C3 F4 FF JMP FFF4 ;Jump to FFF4h
0020 C3 F7 FF JMP FFF7 ;Jump to FFF7h
0028 C3 FA FF JMP FFFA ;Jump to FFFAh
0030 C3 FD FF JMP FFFD ;Jump to FFFDh
0038 C3 D3 09 JMP 09D3 ;Jump to 09D3h
003B D3 F0 OUT F0 ;Send contents of A register to port F0h
003D C3 11 D2 JMP D211 ;Jump to D211h
0040 3B DCX SP ;Decrement stack pointer
0041 00 NOP ;Do nothing
0042 C3 5C 00 JMP 005C ;Jump to 005Ch
0045 21 00 F0 LXI H,00 F0 ;Load register pair H & L with F000h
0048 0E 4E MVI C,4E ;Move 4E to register C
004A AF XRA A ;Clear register A
004B 77 MOV M,A ;Move register A to loc'n given in H & L
004C 23 INX H ;Increment H & L registers
004D 0D DCR D ;Decrement register C
004E C2 4B 00 JNZ 004B ;Jump on no zero to address 004Bh
0051 06 18 MVI B,18 ;Move 18h into register B
0053 21 2A F1 LXI H,F12A ;Load H & L registers with F12Ah
0056 77 MOV M,A ;Move register A to loc'n given in H & L
0057 23 INX H ;Increment H & L registers
0058 05 DCR B ;Decrement register B
0059 C2 53 00 JNZ 0053 ;Jump on no zero to address 0053h
005C 31 9E F0 LXI SP,F09E ;Load stack pointer with F09Eh
005F CD 42 01 CALL 0142 ;Transfer program control to addr 0142h
0062 06 2A MVI B,2A ;Move 2Ah into register B
0064 CD 51 01 CALL 0151 ;Transfer program control to addr 0151h
0067 CD 7A 00 CALL 007A :Transfer program control to addr 007Ah
006A 23 INX H ;Increment H & L registers
006B 7E MOV A,M ;Move value from loc'n in H & L to reg A
006C FE 3A CPI 3A ;Compare A with 3Ah (A - 3Ah)
006E DA 7A 05 JC 057A ;Jump on carry to 057Ah
0071 CD DE 01 CALL 01DE ;Transfer program control to addr 01DEh
0074 CD 94 01 CALL 0194 ;Transfer program control to addr 0194h
0077 C3 5C 00 JMP 005C ;Jump to address 005Ch
007A 21 BC F0 LXI H,F0BC ;Load H & L registers with F0BCh
007D 22 50 F0 SHLD F050 ;Store H & L registers at F050h
Joel A. Weder
jweder(a)telusplanet.net
403-556-4020
You can buy a "new" licensed copy of CP/M (the original DR version) from
California Digital for only $9 at http://www.cadigital.com/software.htm. It
won't be set up for your particular computer, though, but does have the DR
manuals.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stan Sieler [mailto:sieler@allegro.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:38 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Will trade classic H/W for CP/M 2.2 help!
Hi,
> To any CP/M 2.2 users with 8-inch SSSD floppy disks...
> If any list member can help, I'm willing to trade classic hardware such
> as an HP
That's a nice offer, and if my back were better, I'd try to talk you
out of those machines.
However, I suspect that on this list you could simply say "can anyone
send me CP/M 2.2 ..." and you'd get some volunteers. I'd send it if
I had any of my 8" systems working yet! :)
Good luck,
Stan Sieler
Stan Sieler sieler(a)allegro.com
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.htmlwww.allegro.com/sieler
That trick hasn't worked in decades. You can still blue box in some area's but I wouldn't do it. drops a trouble card. Phone phreaking started to go away when the phone companies started to replace the old crossbar switching equipment with electronic switches and computer switching (ESS5, etc...) There are still a few area that you can still red box though. No matter what, its still called stealing.
Brian.
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Gabe Steiger wrote:
> Is it still possible to phreak a phone by unscrewing the talk speaker?
> I tried unscrewing the mouth peice once, could not unscrew it. Bastard
> would NOT budge.
Brian Roth
Network Services
First Niagara Bank
(716) 625-7500 X2186
Brian.Roth(a)FirstNiagaraBank.com
The DN10000 also had a maximum of 4, not 8 processors... There weren't any
actual Apollo products that used the 88K, I guess I could call one of the
founders of Apollo and ask him, but I'm really sure on this one.
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Gabe Steiger wrote:
>
> > Is it still possible to phreak a phone by unscrewing the talk speaker?
> > I tried unscrewing the mouth peice once, could not unscrew it. Bastard
> > would NOT budge.
>
> You've figured out why it is no longer possible to phreak. The phone
> companies passed a law that required phone manufacturers to screw the
> mouthpiece on so tight that nobody could unscrew it. Therefore, phreaking
> is no longer possible ;(
Not to mention the fact that eulB sexoB stopped working with the
switchover from Switching System 6 (which used in-band signalling)
to SS7, which uses out-of-band signalling (i.e. a separate network).
Regards,
-dq
> On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > The Apollo Domain DN10000 used up to (was it 8?) 88k cpu's... it
> > was modular in some way, so that a system could be expanded.
>
> No.
>
> The DN10000 accepted one to four Apollo PRISM CPUs. They were
> not Motorola 88000-series CPUs.
If it wasn't the DN10000, which model was it? I just got done
downloading many megabytes worth of patches for 68k-based
systems *and* for 88k-based systems from HP's web site.
Regards,
-dq
What we really need is a lending library and a central repository for
classic computer equipment. The obvious solution is to go underground. The
law doesn't say anything about below a residential area.
I think a warehouse like the one at the end of "Raiders of the Lost Ark" is
just the answer.
How about underground limestone quarry space?
How about decommissioned missile silo?
Maybe it's a fantasy, but exploring an endless building full of old computer
equipment could be my retirement goal. Probably better than sex. Maybe
it's senility.
Mike
mmcfadden(a)cmh.edu
Is it still possible to phreak a phone by unscrewing the talk speaker? I tried unscrewing the mouth peice once, could not unscrew it. Bastard would NOT budge.
Thanks
Note: From a very new newbie to phreaking :-)
On Jun 7, 22:58, ajp166 wrote:
> From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> >like that. But a box labeled 11/53 and having an 11/23 procssor in it
> is
> > an 11/23, not an 11/53. It won't run RSX-11M or Ultrix configured for
> an
> >11/53, or various things.
>
>
> An 11/23 would run RSX-11 just not the I&D kernal, same for Ultrix
> depending on version.
Of course, but what I wrote was that a kernel configured for amn 11/53
wouldn't run on an 11/23. It would have to be re-SYSGENed.
> >I'm surprised you say it's common. I can see that in a few cases the
> >processor might be removed to use elsewhere
> It was happening when the processors were NEW. Seems it made a very
> compact fairly fast system if the DEC box was not used. However early on
> getting the bare CPU was difficult so people bout 11/53s, snatched the
> cpu
> and resold them with commonly available 11/23s (as Micropdp-11s)
Oh, I see. I suppose that makes sense. It doesn't seem to have been
common over here, though.
> >I'm thinking of
> >11/03 -> 11/23, 11/23 -> 11/73, 11/73 -> 11/83, microVAX -> microVAX-II
> >upgrades).
>
> Yep, like my 11T03 that has a BA11N and 11/73 cpu
I have its exact mate here :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Good God, I'm glad I live in the middle of nowhere... My garage contains
enough stuff that there is only a 2 foot wide path to use as a walkway, and
there is a big stack of lead acid batteries next to the garage (to be
recycled sometime). Until we got new siding, I had a big mound o' aluminum
there.. There's the frame of a System/36 in the backyard (temporarily), and
a semi trailer by the barn. You're lucky if your planning officials are
nice, the county commissioners where I live are corrupt and have shit for
brains. Like their brilliant law that if you operated a boarding stable, you
had to have this stupid "use by special review" which you couldn't get if
even one neighbor wouldn't agree to it, so naturally we had one dipshit
neighbor who objected... So without it, the "wise" commissioners said you
could only board one horse per 20 acres... and we had 40 acres with an 18
stall barn... Needless to say, we boarded 18 horses there... *urinates upon
Douglas County*
Will J
(end rant)
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Hi,
> Not that I want to provide the canonical list of 88k machines, but
I'm
> guessing DG sold the most 88000 machines. I personally used a
Tektronics
> XD88, which was a beast performer at the time.
I've got an XD88 (running now, thanks to list help!) - they really do fly
for the age of the things. I can't remember how many 88100 chips it has -
just the two I think. Not sure of the core speed either. My system's the '10
with the 8-bit framebuffer; wouldn't mind the '30 with the 24-bit unit (from
the scare info I've heard this was a significantly different machine with a
proper expansion bus etc.)
I don't know why these things failed - I know they were hidiously expensive
when new though ($15000 for an '88/10 in the late 80's) so maybe there just
was no market for them... bet there aren't many left these days!
cheers
Jules
Lee:
Regarding the SYM-Physis issues, he's sent me issues 1-8 already.
Apparently Massimo is a scanning maniac.
I plan on posting them anyway. It's nice to have multiple sources
available for this information.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Davison, Lee [mailto:Lee.Davison@merlincommunications.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:19 PM
To: 'classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org'
Subject: RE: SYM1 Page
Richard,
> the SYM1. So much so, that I may put up a "SYM1 page"
> on Highgate. He's now working on scanning the SYM Physis,
> a newsletter for SYM users (1979-1982).
Issues 1 to 10 are allready available on www.6502.org
Lee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
information contained in this email may contain information which is
confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
If you have received this email and you are not a named addressee please
delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
01285 884400.
A while ago Bill Sudbrink wrote ..
I just acquired Microsoft 8K basic in ROM for OSI on paper tape. I currently
have no facility to read it, so I don't know if it is source or object. The
tape seems to be in good shape (doesn't seem to be fragile) so it should be
good for a few passes through a reader. I'll let you know.
... Was it ever read? If so is it available?
Cheers,
Lee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
information contained in this email may contain information which is
confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
If you have received this email and you are not a named addressee please
delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
01285 884400.
umm...go for some of the boxes
not only is it easier...you'd be surprised how much electronics knowledge you
can pick up just by screwin with that stuff
Can anyone enliten me about these computers. I was invited to help
someone clean out his garage.
Ibex, CPM 2.2 I have received a two dual floppy machine, one is 8"
floppies and the other is 5" floppies.
Also need to know the best way to recover 8" floppies that are water
affected.
In the haul was a VZ200 with tape drive and some IBM Jr (?)
If someone wants the IBM box, they are welcome. I'm in Sydney
Australia..
taah.
--
Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(02) 4628 7861
email: terryc(a)woa.com.au www: http://www.woa.com.au
WOA Computer Services <lan/wan, linux/unix, novell>
"People without trees are like fish without clean water"
Hello, all:
"Massimo from Italy" has been sending me more scans and stuff related to
the SYM1. So much so, that I may put up a "SYM1 page" on Highgate. He's now
working on scanning the SYM Physis, a newsletter for SYM users (1979-1982).
If anyone has anything they'd like to post, let me know off list. Also, I'm
looking for a small Web-sized picture of the SYM for the page (I don't have
a SYM to photograph).
Thanks.
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
>like that. But a box labeled 11/53 and having an 11/23 procssor in it
is
> an 11/23, not an 11/53. It won't run RSX-11M or Ultrix configured for
an
>11/53, or various things.
An 11/23 would run RSX-11 just not the I&D kernal, same for Ultrix
depending on version.
>I'm surprised you say it's common. I can see that in a few cases the
>processor might be removed to use elsewhere, but how many systems end up
>with a 5-years-older processor in them? In my experience, it's much
more
It was happening when the processors were NEW. Seems it made a very
compact fairly fast system if the DEC box was not used. However early on
getting the bare CPU was difficult so people bout 11/53s, snatched the
cpu
and resold them with commonly available 11/23s (as Micropdp-11s)
>common to see systems with later processors in them (though I'm thinking
of
>11/03 -> 11/23, 11/23 -> 11/73, 11/73 -> 11/83, microVAX -> microVAX-II
>upgrades).
Yep, like my 11T03 that has a BA11N and 11/73 cpu or maybe my
microvax-ii
that was downgraded to a Micropdp-11. ;)
Allison
To any CP/M 2.2 users with 8-inch SSSD floppy disks...
I'm restoring an Imsai 8080, and at this point my hardware is working
very
well, but I need some assistance with the software.
If any list member can help, I'm willing to trade classic hardware such
as an HP
9830A desktop programmable (in basic!) calculator, a Symbolics 3645 Lisp
Machine
(with 2 monitors, and full doc set), a Solid State Music S-100 bus music
synthisizer, DEC goodies, etc...
Lets make a deal....without eBay.....
All the hardware for trade is located in centeral MA, not too far from
the site
for VCF East!
Who ever gets this deal, and helps get this Imsai up to the A:> prompt
WILL be
made happy.
(and share in the satisfaction of saving this particular Imsai from the
dust bin
of history)
My problem is this:
I need a bootable 8-inch, SSSD CP/M 2.2 disk made with a BIOS for my
hardware...
I do have full documentation for all the hardware installed in my
system.
I have an Imsai 8080 with 40K of RAM, a Tarbell 1101-D floppy controller
with 2
SA-800
drives, and a Solid State Music IO-4 board. There are some old CP/M 1.3
disks
that came
with the system, and they ~appear~ to boot, but I get no console I/O.
Most of the
disks
claim to be for memory configurations larger than I currently have.
I can disable the Tarbell boot code and enter small programs by hand,
and I've
verifed that
the SSM IO-4 boards serial port is fully operational. Attempting to
boot a 24K
CP/M 1.3
disk ~looks~ like its working, the head loads and unloads several times,
data gets
loaded
into memory by the boot loader code from the floppy, but no console I/O.
Who knows what hardware config this disk expects, it appears to be a
very early
CP/M
install for this Imsai, and its clearly been expanded several times
since this
disk was cut.
I'd also LOVE to upgrade the many 2102 based Ram boards with any
non-2102 based
SRAM
board. I do have 22 slots, but 4K and 8K boards just take up too much
room.
So, is anyone out there with 8-inch CM/M 2.2, and who is just dying for
a
Symbolics 3645?
Just 'gottahave' an HP9830A (all key caps, unbroken plastic, etc) LED
dot matrix
calculator?
(check one out on the HP calculator museum site, clearly collectable...)
Drop me a line off the list, and lets make a deal!
Richard,
> the SYM1. So much so, that I may put up a "SYM1 page"
> on Highgate. He's now working on scanning the SYM Physis,
> a newsletter for SYM users (1979-1982).
Issues 1 to 10 are allready available on www.6502.org
Lee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
information contained in this email may contain information which is
confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
If you have received this email and you are not a named addressee please
delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
01285 884400.
Still have 2 left of the ones listed below if anyone's interested:
--------------------------
I have some AC adapters I bought in a lot, I gave $1 each for them and
pulled what I need from them. Input is 120VAC 60hz 800ma and output on a
standard round/tubular "coax" connector is 16VAC, 4A. Fused with a 5A/250V
fuse built in and changeable if blown. They're bricks with about 3 ft of
wire to the 2 prong AC plug and about 3 ft to the coax adapter. Brick
measures about 3" wide, 3.5" deep and 2.5" high. Made by Eltron with the
part number 808061-001.
I have 4 I need to get rid of at $1.00 each plus applicable postage. They
weigh 3 lbs each. Someone can have them all or just 1, 2, etc. I'm in
central KY in zip 42726 in the event someone wishes to calc shipping.
----------------------------------
> Not that I want to provide the canonical list of 88k machines, but I'm
> guessing DG sold the most 88000 machines. I personally used a Tektronics
> XD88, which was a beast performer at the time. Encore built a big 88k
> multi, as did BBN. There were a lot of MVME-based systems, with various
> badges. There are a bunch of rare/odd machines as well (the Omron Luna is
> significant because of it's role in developing Mach). As one poster pointed
> out, Apple considered using the 88000 (including producing prototype
> hardware and partially porting MacOS), as did NeXT.
The Apollo Domain DN10000 used up to (was it 8?) 88k cpu's... it
was modular in some way, so that a system could be expanded.
I hope to add a DN10000 to the collection, eventually...
-dq
>An HP150 is a PC-incompatible. It's an 8088-based machine that runs
>MS-DOS (if you add an optional disk drive), but not IBM PC MS-DOS. It is
>not compatible with the PC at the hardware or BIOS level, so most
>software has to be specially written for the HP150.
>Without a disk drive you can't (obviously) boot MS-DOS. But there is a HP
>terminal emulator in the ROM which will run with out a disk drive being
>connected. If you need an HP-compatible terminal for some other machine,
>the HP150 is a possible choice.
There's a couple of other uses for it:
1) It can run HP-Word from an HP-3000.
2) With a floppy, it can be used to boot an HP-3000 Series 70.
3) With a touchscreen, its a great terminal for a dumb blonde.
http://www.kzin.com/trader/blonde.jpg
(off the cover of a manual, I think her name is P.A.M.)
It wasn't a bad little computer for its time. But by making it
so incompatible HP missed the boat, as usual.
Lance.
A friend is cleaning out some storage space and has a couple of boxes of
Kaypro related items available for pickup or shipping only. Each box is
approximately 12x12x16". One contains 5.25" DSDD diskettes containing
an accumulation of programs from his BBS days. The second is of manuals
and magazines - Profile, etc. Sorry, I can't be more specific, but if
you are interested contact Milton Blackstone at 858-459-8255.
He would like to see them go this month.
Thanks.
- don
I am cleaning out my closets and have the following available. I am mostly
interested in trades for older CPUs, coprocessors etc. All the board should
be in good working order, but no guarantees. Shipping is on your nickel.
Please email me directly at anheier(a)owt.com.
Thanks Norm
1) Intel EtherExpress 16TP Lan Adapter, ISA bus.
2) NuVista+ Video digitizer for macintosh, can drive external VGA monitor,
software and manual, Nubus bus.
3) SuperMac Video card for one of their monitors, Nubus bus
4) Mac IIci Cache Card, macintosh cache slot
5) Orchid Technology Prodesigner II video card, IBM MCA bus
6) UDS_ISSII PC/ISA SCSI Port card, ISA bus
7) Ungermann-Bass Ethernet Adapter, ISA bus
8) Apple Hi-Res Display Video card, Nubus bus
9) SCSI LVD/SE, Ultra2 SCSI card, IBM MCA bus
10) UMAX computer, M604e 150MHz daughter card, tested to work in apple 7600,
8600, etc.
Hi
Still cleaning up here (seems I do this everyweek now) and noticed I have
way too many....
C64s (tan version) with power supply
1541 Disk Drives
1541 II Disk Drives with power supply
C64 Programmers reference guides
I threw out all the bad shape ones, gave some away and still have way too
many...about 4 of each...
All of these are clean and work. They could be going to dump this week if no
takers but it's ashame cause they are fine shape...
See more of the stuff I have to giveaway/trade:
http://computer_collector.tripod.com
or
http://members.tripod.com/computer_collector/
Claude
Interesting architecture. Brain dump follows; forgive inacurracy due to
bit-rot in the brain.
The 88000 was Motorola's' stab at RISC technology, after deciding (well,
being told by customers), that there wasn't much interest in follow-ons to
the 68040 (look how few 68060 adopters their were, relatively speaking). It
came out in 1988, placing it late compared to the rest of the 1st generation
of commercial RISC. Harvard architecture, 32 GP registers, register
renaming, pipelined w/ interlocks, on-chip FPU, well defined co-processor
interface and later on, superscalar & speculative execution. Later
versions, as I recall, also had special bit manipulation instructions
designed to manipulate pixel data (distant shades of Intel MMX) with
seperate functional units to execute those instructions. All the right
buzzwords, and it had very competative integer & FP benchmark numbers (I
recall ~17MIPs & ~20MFLOPs @ 20MHz for the 88100, depending on speed). I
know they ran at 16.67MHz, 20MHz, 25MHz & 33MHz; not sure about other
speeds.
It started life as a fairly typical multi-chip Motorola design, which
certainly impacted manufacturing costs. There was a core CPU chip (the
88100), then some number of 88200 or 88204 CMMU chips, which provided 16KB
or 64KB cache, respectively, and an MMU. Cache had split I+D buses, with a
given chip dedicated to one or the other bus. One could use 0 to 8 CMMUs,
giving up to 256K+256K I+D cache per CPU. AFAIK, 2 was the most common
number, and 3 or more was rare due to cost. I know the BBN TC2000 used 3
per CPU, which gave 32KB I & 16K D cache (or vice versa). I can't recall
off the top of my head a machine that used more than 4, though there
certainly were some. Someone once told me that an Omron Luna used a single
88200 per processor. I've never seen one, so I can't confirm, nor would I
know if it was caching instructions or data. Many folks used just the 88100
CPU for embedded applications. NCD built a bunch of 88k Xterminals sans
CMMUs, for example.
The later (and much faster) 88110 processor integrated MMU & cache (8k+8k
I+D) on chip, much like what happened between the 68020 and the 68030
(well...sans cache to be pedantic). They also added more functional units.
There was an 88120 that was planned but never saw the light of day.
There was plug-and-play hardware support (e.g. hardware cache coherency
mechanism) for up to 4 way multiprocessing, so you saw a lot of 2- and 4-way
multis. Spinlocks, etc., were real easy to implement on the 88k.
Motorola had a pretty strong ABI spec for SVR3 & SVR4 (88Open), which would
have been useful had the chip been more successful.
Not that I want to provide the canonical list of 88k machines, but I'm
guessing DG sold the most 88000 machines. I personally used a Tektronics
XD88, which was a beast performer at the time. Encore built a big 88k
multi, as did BBN. There were a lot of MVME-based systems, with various
badges. There are a bunch of rare/odd machines as well (the Omron Luna is
significant because of it's role in developing Mach). As one poster pointed
out, Apple considered using the 88000 (including producing prototype
hardware and partially porting MacOS), as did NeXT.
In the end, Motorola decided (for many reasons that I won't begin to
untangle) to back the IBM PowerPC chip. The rest, as they say, is history.
ObObscureHistoricalFootnote: DG apparently ported DG/UX to the SPARC at one
point. To return the favor, Sun ported Solaris 2.5 to the PowerPC (the chip
that replaced the 88000). Doubtful anyone ever purchased either product.
That's how I remember it...I could be wrong...
Ken Seefried, CISSP
I'll try one more time...
It's fully functional, including the touch screen.
It has 640K of RAM (256K integrated + 384K on an
expansion board).
Best offer.
> From: Douglas Quebbeman <dhquebbeman(a)theestopinalgroup.com>
>
> >I live for the day when Outlook or Exchange allow me to
> >simply establish a filter that strips all incoming mail
> >of any HTML....
>
> I live for the day I can strip OE for a real mailer not the cartoon thing
> MS pushes off. My kind of mailer is Vax Mail. Nice simple command
> line text mailer.
I'm surprised that Elm and Pine haven't been ported to Win32 Console
apps...
-dq
Yes, I have posted these before, bear with me please...its the last time...
Well I have stumbled upon this box full of books again that I have offered a
few times here. A few trade offers fell through but now I hope to get these
to a good home...they must go now as part of my Spring cleaning 2001 project
(now extending into summer 2001...)
I would like to trade these - I dont use ebay to buy or sell so they wont go
there.
Id like to get something in return because I paid a bit of $ for these when
I got them as part of a Apple IIgs bundle....
They are a box full of all the reference manuals for the IIgs hardware and
software, I think 9-10 hard/softcover books in all.
Toolbox reference vol 1,2,3...programmer intro to the Apple IIgs, etc...
See a pic at : http://members.tripod.com/computer_collector/iigs/iigsbks.jpg
I would except a trade for vintage stuff (home/hobby 8 bits/16 bits) not too
common or better yet : as recent as possible SUN or SGI
computers/equipement.
Thanks
Claude
http://members.tripod.com/computer_collector
On June 7, Brian Roth wrote:
> Great! A couple of former DEC brokers I contacted did not even know what a
> RV20 was. Shipping might be a bear though as I believe the weight will be
> similar to and RL drive.
Oh, that won't be a problem. I've shipped RK drives...as in RK07. 8)
-Dave McGuire
I am currently reducing my collection to "DEC only" and in the coming
weeks(months) will be posting some giveaways. I have bunches of everything to
get rid of. I will give precedence to DEC related trades and then just ask for
shipping charges after that.
First off I need to know if anyone is interested in
Data General stuff. I have a couple of box's of manuals and software. I
believe there might be some early NOVA manuals in the stack. I also have a dual
8" rack mount floppy coming in. I would like to see these go to an active DG
collector.
I currently have 7 Intel MCS -80/85 Family User manuals in new condition. Free
to anyone. A few bucks for postage at your convienience would be nice but not
necessary. Like I said I have a lot of stuff and the shipping charges are going
to add up after a while.
Brian.
-- Brian Roth - System Administrator
www.webwirz.com - Old Computer Repository
Preoccupation is my main occupation.....
On June 7, Geoff Reed wrote:
> The 29-28310-01 is off a digital label.
>
> also on the board are
>
> 90-0000308-001
> and
> 91-0000308-001-01
>
> (C) 1989 Corrolary INC.
>
> it's an ISA board with an 80186 2 zilog z0853004PSC's an AM9517A-5 and a
> boatload of pals on it, it looks kind of like a multiport serial card it
> has mac looking ports on it that look just like the serial ports on a
> macintosh or sparc IPC/IPX. (Mini-din8?) sorry, my memory is trashed this
> am...
> and i might be able to throw a picture online of it soon....
Hmm...Z8530 is a [very nice] dual-channel serial I/O chip and the
Am9517 is a DMA controller...which, rather decidedly, makes it a
high-speed multiport serial card.
The Z8530 is capable of synchronous and HDLC/SDLC operation as well,
up to 2mbps if memory serves. I have no idea what this particular
board was built to do, but it could even be something fancy like that.
-Dave McGuire
On June 6, Brian Roth wrote:
> Any chance that someone may have an DEC RV20 worm drive they would like to
> part company with? I just received some carts with software I would like to
> read. Also looking for a keyboard for a VAXmate.
A surplus house that I deal with now & then has had one on the shelf
for some time. I'll head over there and ask 'em how much they want
for it. If their price is reasonable for you I can go grab it and
ship it to you.
-Dave McGuire
On June 6, Geoff Reed wrote:
> 29-28310-01 IC8X4 MULTIPLEXOR BOARD
>
> I don't know if this falles under the classic here, but any info I can get
> on this would be great! compaq has been less than helpful on telling me
> what it is....
Are there any other numbers on this board?
Can you up a photo of it?
-Dave McGuire
On June 7, Sellam Ismail wrote:
> > > Geez....Microsoft created over 300 new newsgroups in the last day....
> >
> > As if it's not bad enough that those idiots have set our industry
> > back about fifteen years. NOW they're wasting bandwidth on top of it!
>
> I enjoy a good Microsoft bashing as much as the next nerd, but 300
> newsgroups out of the 50,000 or so that are currently in existence is not
> going to break any camel backs ;)
Oh, c'mon. It was a good enough excuse for me. ;)
-Dave McGuire
On Jun 7, 0:36, Megan wrote:
> Pete Turnbull wrote:
> >Allison, for once I feel you're wrong. An 11/53 is a distinct processor
> I don't think that was the point of what she was saying... I think it
> was that although the *BOX* said 11/53, there was actually an 11/23
> plugged into the bus. I can understand that might be the case nowadays,
> with all the moving of boards and such... but I cannot believe that
> DEC ever marketed a machine which said 11/53 which might contain an
> 11/23 processor... someone surely would have noticed and had a problem
> with it...
Megan, I agree with what you say about boards being moved around. Of my
ten or so PDP-11 systems only three or four had the "right" processor when
I got them. But I got the distinct impression Allison was (at least at one
stage) suggesting that (early) 11/53 systems were intended to have a
processor that wasn't a distinct member of the 11/x3 family.
Allison wrote:
> Isn't the 11/53 the box name and the cpu being either an 11/73
> or 11/23B?
Well, then it's not an 11/53 any more :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jun 6, 21:43, ajp166 wrote:
> From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> What part of what I wrote is unclear? The comment is most 11/53s I've
> seen contained 11/23B cpus. that maybe "not as shipped" but very
> commonplace.
>
> >office use. When it was announced (1987), it was as a J11 processor
> with
> >separate I&D space and RAM on the processor card -- which no 11/23 has.
> I
> >never heard of one having an 11/23 as shipped by DEC.
>
>
> Never said it was. I said many early 11/53boxen HAD 11/23s not they
> shipped
> with 11/23s. Seems they were fertile ground for modified systems.
It read as if you were saying an 11/53 could have a M8189. Of course a box
can have a particular label, but have some other CPU in it - I have a few
like that. But a box labeled 11/53 and having an 11/23 procssor in it is
an 11/23, not an 11/53. It won't run RSX-11M or Ultrix configured for an
11/53, or various things.
I'm surprised you say it's common. I can see that in a few cases the
processor might be removed to use elsewhere, but how many systems end up
with a 5-years-older processor in them? In my experience, it's much more
common to see systems with later processors in them (though I'm thinking of
11/03 -> 11/23, 11/23 -> 11/73, 11/73 -> 11/83, microVAX -> microVAX-II
upgrades).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
29-28310-01 IC8X4 MULTIPLEXOR BOARD
I don't know if this falles under the classic here, but any info I can get
on this would be great! compaq has been less than helpful on telling me
what it is....
The AViiON's were made by Data General, of NOVA fame.
The first models appeared 1991 or therebouts. These
used the (then) new Motorola 88000 RISC processor chip
set.
They made desktop (AV-300) and deskside (AV-400,500)
workstations, as well as multi-processor servers
(AV-8000's for example). The first ones were kinda
slow, owing to the 1st generation RISC processor and a
rather overweight UNIX port (DG/UX).
Later multi-processor machines (some had as many as
eight, IIRC) using the 88110 processor were much
faster.
Mot dropped the ball (as usual) in the mid-90's and
abandoned the 88000 in favor of the PowerPC*.
When this happened, DG shifted over to the 'Dark Side'
(i.e. Intel) and have done nothing remarkable after
that.
IMNHO, only 88k AViiONs are really worth keeping
(unless you're *really* into WINNT). DG/UX is okay,
I guess; but I mostly like the fact that technical docs
are available for at least one model (AV-530), and it
has VME cardslots.
*Footnote:
What's truly tragic, is that Apple was preparing to
manufacture 88000-based mac's (several prototypes were
built in the early nineties). This project was
squashed by internal politics, however.
On 7 Jun 2001 1:59:57 +0100 "Iggy Drougge" <optimus(a)canit.se> writes:
> Isn't the Aviion the Motorola 88000 based line of workstations by
> General Electric or some other megalomaniac corporation?
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.