From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
>I wondered where you'd gone.
Yep, 2400 is far too slow for that much mail.
>> FYI: there were 1810 messages all but 9 were from Classiccmp...
>> thats a bit much, no?
>
>Yes, but you arguably didn't miss too much :-)
>From the 2% audit of what went in the trash can I'd agree.
Allison
Tony wrote:
> More seriously, that's why I've not made a cleanbox yet. The drives I
> want to be able to work on, and the ones I am likely to have some chance
> of fixing are things like the 14" SA4000 units. Which need a _large_
> cleanbox. And, like everyone here, I have little enough space...
I think you've a second problem besides the size issue, being able to handle
something that big in a cleanbox seems rather impractical. It might work
for 5.25" or 8" HD's, but I don't see it working for a 14" HD. How on earth
could you get the leverage or whatever to crack it open!
Zane
If it is any comfort John, yours is not an isolated experience.
With regards to my recent rescue of all the NeXT stuff. It was rescued
>from an "institution of higher learning". It was removed from service
around 5 years ago. They decided at the time to have a 'yard sale' and
include these machines. That never happened, and after 5 years they
decided to rid themselves of it.
If that were an isolated case I wouldn't mind. After all I got to rescue
the stuff. The gotcha is that they just decommissioned all their DEC
hardware. You can darn well bet by now all docs, tapes, etc. have been
pitched. On my last visit I asked if any of the DEC was available.
The response was that they had just decided to put it all the DEC in a
yard sale. Oh Joy! So those DECstations, VAXstations, Infoserver(s),
Alphas, and who knows what else are going to sit in a warehouse somewhere
until who knows when. And I know from the NeXT experience that they will
be picked over, and in some cases there won't be enough of a given machine
left to even sell to the recyclers.
Given the four "institutions of higher learning" in this town, I have
worked for one full time, taught at another part time, and dealt with
the other two with regards to equipment rescues. I have come to the
conclusion the higher learning does not create greater smarts, and
in most cases lessens the amount of common sense. I suspect that
a boot full of common sense would not help, even with instructions
on how to use written on the bottom.
That's my opinion, and I'm stickin' to it.
Mike
> I don't have a network card, but if all goes well a GVP
> Spectrum graphics card is going into it. BTW, 3.9 includes a bunch
> of AVI's and a few MP3's on the CD to test the various media players
> with, as well as an audio track. I'm not planning on upgrading any
> of the other custom chips unless I find I have to, such as the Buster.
There are MP3 players for 68k Amiga's?!?! That's either rather gutsy, or
pathetic, I'm not sure which. What do they do, decode them to another
format and then play them?
> Mine's going underneathe my NEC monitor and sharing it with
> the G3. This little Multisync C400 has certainly seen it's share of
> various computers since I bought it in '96!
The monitors I've got would probably crush a A3000! I might be able to put
it in the wooden rack next to the desk, but the PDP-8/m sits where it would
need to go, and I'm going to need to find more room in the rack for a
PDP-8/e and Papertape reader/punch.
OTOH, I might be able to stuff it under the A2002 Monitor I've got hooked up
to a dead VCR (I use the combo for a TV in the computer room.
> I'm going to use mine as a backup system as well as one to
> handle those times when I just feel the urge ot use an Amiga. The
> fact that it doesn't depend on anything MS is nice too. You could
> also use it as a Linux box too. It'd be cool to fix the kernel panic
> on mine when booting into Linux, but that's a low priority. I think
> I saw some of the distro files still on the hard disk when I was
> moving stuff around on the Amiga partition.
Don't need a backup system, and I've no desire to run Linux on anything but
a fast x86 box. So I'm still trying to come up with a use for it. That was
one of the reasons I bought it a Catweasel, however, the board didn't
function as advertised thanks to the lack of software for it. Of course the
Catweasel board is also why it's sitting in a monster ALR Server Tower at
the moment!
Zane
>
> > MicroVAX 3600
> > uVAX 1000
> > RA81 (2)
> > RA90
>
> >From personal experience I would say $50 is too little
> and $250 is too much, tho I've never heard of a
> uVAX 1000. Next commentator?
>
> John A.
>
>
I'd say $100 max. In some ways he should be paying you to remove the
RA81's!
As for the uVAX 1000, a couple thoughts come to mind... One is an
Infoserver 1000 (which definitly exists) the other, scratching around in the
back of my mind, is some model of VAXft (which probably doesn't exist). One
thing to remember is that there are a couple oddball models you don't ever
hear about, however, I've never heard of a uVAX 1000.
Zane
On Jul 20, 19:24, ajp166 wrote:
> I'm back, if anyone noticed.
>
> DSL and Phone modem cooked on June 30th put me off the air save
> my 2400 baud pocket modem.
I wondered where you'd gone.
> FYI: there were 1810 messages all but 9 were from Classiccmp...
> thats a bit much, no?
Yes, but you arguably didn't miss too much :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On July 20, Tony Duell wrote:
> > Well, for some folks, maybe. If someone sticks me in a project with a
> > crappy OS, I will find the source and fix it (unless it's Windoze, of
> > course, but I don't consider that an OS!)...whereas if someone sticks
> > me with a crappy processor, well, there's little one can do.
>
> Err, find the schematics and fix it. Oh, you meant a microprocessor.... :-)
;) *poke*
-Dave McGuire
Chuck McManis <cmcmanis(a)mcmanis.com>@classiccmp.org on 07/19/2001 03:21:47
PM
Please respond to classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Sent by: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
cc:
Subject: Re: OT: DSL Woes (was RE: Plato terminal
At 01:31 PM 7/19/01 -0500, you wrote:
>I'm troubled by the desire of companies to provide mission critical
services
>over consumer quality telecommunication and computer equipment.
And you wonder why they went out of business? DSL can be much more reliable
than Cable Modems but it does have to be installed properly, and you need
to have the correct filter at the junction box to prevent interference with
line noise.
--Chuck
--------------------------------------------------------
Very true. Qwest (Formerly U.S.Worst,er West) in Cedar Rapids Iowa has
fairly decent DSL. They don't futz around with your computer like the @Home
cable modem folks do. I've had 256k DSL for about 9 months now and had
about 37 minutes of down time. (~20 min, and then ~17 min a couple months
later) Of course I live in a bedroom community about 5 blocks from the
TelCo switch. <grin>
My only gripe is that the Cisco 675 DSL router/modem they sold me MUST be
in routing mode, not bridging mode, and it does not have the capability to
do port forwarding. <sigh> So you can't run a server to save your soul.
- M.S.
On July 20, Eric Dittman wrote:
> > That would be downright silly, because they haven't EOLed the
> > line...they've announced that the WILL EOL it, in what should be a
> > couple of years.
>
> There is a lot of panic about the future EOL of the Alpha, with
> a lot of people equating that to the end of OpenVMS, which is
> wrong. This is just another architecture transition. I would
Yup.
> have preferred that the Alpha go on, but the real point is the
> OS, not the CPU.
Well, for some folks, maybe. If someone sticks me in a project with a
crappy OS, I will find the source and fix it (unless it's Windoze, of
course, but I don't consider that an OS!)...whereas if someone sticks
me with a crappy processor, well, there's little one can do.
> I can see people trying to stock up spares ahead of the EOL,
> though. It would be better to grab them while they are
> plentiful and cheap than to wait until the EOL when people
> will want to stockpile some of the items that will be harder
> to get later.
Good point. But the EOL is *years* away. Isn't this a little
premature, even for the "careful folk"?
-Dave McGuire
Hi,
I'm new to the list, so just a quick bit about me - I'm in my 3rd year
of a 4 year MEng Software Engineering degree at UMIST, UK, and I'm quite
happily collecting machines (much to the annoyance of my parents :&)
Anyway - the point of the mail is... I've been given an LP25, and it's
not a happy beastie :&( When you turn it on, it's status display says
"P" (power fault), and lo and behold, it's right. There's a definate lack
of any regulated voltages on the motherboard, the only voltage there is
the 38V RAW voltage, which is within limits.
So I've decided that the power board is at fault. The Maintainance
Manual says "Check fuses..." which I've done - all fine. So I figure
there's a fault on the power board. Problem is, I don't have any
schematics for the power board, so I can't really test it, without a lot
of trial and error.
I'd be very grateful if someone could point me at somewhere I might find
something useful, or even lend me the details, if you've got them :&)
(oh, and if anyone in the UK has a spare VMS 5.x docset up for
grabs... or perhaps a DECwriter :&)
-- Matt
---
E-mail:
matt(a)pkl.net, matt(a)knm.yi.org, matt(a)printf.net
matt(a)m-techdiagnostics.ltd.uk, matthew.london(a)stud.umist.ac.uk
mattl(a)vcd.student.utwente.nl, mlondon(a)mail.talk-101.com
Web Page:
http://knm.yi.org/http://pkl.net/~matt/
PGP Key fingerprint = 00BF 19FE D5F5 8EAD 2FD5 D102 260E 8BA7 EEE4 8D7F
PGP Key http://knm.yi.org/matt-pgp.html
> At 07:22 PM 7/19/01 -0700, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> >Though as I was cursing this morning, even with MacOS 9.1 a Mac can't format
> >a floppy and do something else. I love my G4/450, but that's just plain
> >pathetic.
>
> And I thought that having dual processors on my G4 would have
> some effect allowing doing more than one thing at once, but
> it doesn't. I bought it (that is, Apple sold it) months before
> OS X was shipped. OS X will use the dual processors. A few
> odd PhotoShop plugins use it. The distributed.net client uses it.
> Other than that, I wasted a few hundred bucks.
>
> - John
Yes, BUT this has been a known problem dating back to the Quad-Processor 3rd
Party Mac's that were made around '95. How good of a job is OS X doing at
dual processors? One would hope pretty good, but I honestly don't know. I
bought OS X the day it came out (and have every beta ever released going
back to the OPENSTEP 4.2 "Prelude to Rhapsody" release), but I've barely
used it, it just isn't ready for my everyday use. By this Fall/Winter it's
starting to sound like it will be. I've got to admit I'm looking forward to
the release of Microsoft Office for it, with that, Eudora, Netscrape, and
eXodus I should be able to switch. Though in the long run I'll also need to
upgrade Photoshop and some other apps. Who knows, I'm happy with 9.1, and
might just stay there for another year or two, if not longer. After all it
does everything I need, and something tells me it's going to be a minimum of
another year before I feel the need to upgrade to a newer system. I made
about 2.8 years with my 8500/180, and it looks like I'll do even better with
the G4/450 as they're just finally starting to come out with systems that
should be significantly faster than my system (something to realize is my
system is from the very first batch of G4/450's sold). However, unlike the
8500/180, it doesn't look like I'll be skipping a processor family (though
who knows I might).
Zane
...for cost of shipping?
Also usable in most Ricoh engine based laser printers.
Have five complete, and a sixth partial.
-jim
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Computer Garage Fax - (503) 646-0174
Hello everyone!
I'm looking for sources of inexpensive Digital Alpha CPUs and motherboards
for a hobby project I'm putting together with my friends. I tried eBay, but
there is not much Alpha gear to be found there. I'd be very grateful for
any pointers.
PS. I love this list.
Jacek
--
Czatuj, wyslij sms-y, sprawdz poczte
Zainstaluj OnetKomunikatora [ http://ok.onet.pl/ ]
Does anyone know where I might find three teenagers in the Marlborough,
Massachusetts area wanting to make some money by working various roles at
the VCF?
If so, please reply to <sellam(a)vintage.org> ASAP. I will discuss the
details with you and you can pass them along to any potential
slave^H^H^H^H^H Event Services Engineer ;)
Thanks!
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
On Jul 18, 11:21, Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) wrote:
> Shortly after that, the U.S.A. and USSR (CCCP) normalized diplomatic
> relations enough to import vodka and export Pepsi to Russia.
Definitely OT: one of my prized T-shirts is a Russian Pepsi one :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On July 20, Bill Bradford wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:41:59PM -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
> > I've seen references to "3030" in many books over the years...I'm
> > nowhere near old enough to have been there though.
> > -Dave McGuire
>
> Same here, in the "IBM's Early Computers" and "IBM's 360 and Early 370 Systems"
> books, which are as close to canon as I can find on the subject...
Speaking of which...anyone know where I might get my grubby paws on
one of those Micro/370 boards?
-Dave McGuire
On July 20, Eric Dittman wrote:
> > > have preferred that the Alpha go on, but the real point is the
> > > OS, not the CPU.
> >
> > Well, for some folks, maybe. If someone sticks me in a project with a
> > crappy OS, I will find the source and fix it (unless it's Windoze, of
> > course, but I don't consider that an OS!)...whereas if someone sticks
> > me with a crappy processor, well, there's little one can do.
>
> I meant the point is the OS (OpenVMS) and not the CPU (VAX, Alpha, IPF),
> not the OS vs. the CPU in general.
Ahh, ok...
> > Good point. But the EOL is *years* away. Isn't this a little
> > premature, even for the "careful folk"?
>
> Not really. For some of the odd-ball stuff, the sooner the better
> (just ask anyone that has to keep a VAX going that uses the Pro3x0-
> based console).
Eeeek! Yes, you have a point! 8-)
-Dave McGuire
> > > That would be downright silly, because they haven't EOLed the
> > > line...they've announced that the WILL EOL it, in what should be a
> > > couple of years.
> >
> > There is a lot of panic about the future EOL of the Alpha, with
> > a lot of people equating that to the end of OpenVMS, which is
> > wrong. This is just another architecture transition. I would
>
> Yup.
>
> > have preferred that the Alpha go on, but the real point is the
> > OS, not the CPU.
>
> Well, for some folks, maybe. If someone sticks me in a project with a
> crappy OS, I will find the source and fix it (unless it's Windoze, of
> course, but I don't consider that an OS!)...whereas if someone sticks
> me with a crappy processor, well, there's little one can do.
I meant the point is the OS (OpenVMS) and not the CPU (VAX, Alpha, IPF),
not the OS vs. the CPU in general.
> > I can see people trying to stock up spares ahead of the EOL,
> > though. It would be better to grab them while they are
> > plentiful and cheap than to wait until the EOL when people
> > will want to stockpile some of the items that will be harder
> > to get later.
>
> Good point. But the EOL is *years* away. Isn't this a little
> premature, even for the "careful folk"?
Not really. For some of the odd-ball stuff, the sooner the better
(just ask anyone that has to keep a VAX going that uses the Pro3x0-
based console).
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
On Jul 18, 21:56, Jarkko Teppo wrote:
> Quoting Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>:
>
> > On the subject of NeXTs, how do you get a NeXT to use standard files
> > (/etc/hosts, et al) instead of the netinfo stuff?
> What you may want to read is chapter 10 (Incorporating a NeXT Computer
> into a Mixed Network) from NeXT Network and System Administration.
Available
> on paper back and probably on your system disk as well.
I'll have a look for that. Any idea where I'd find it? I don't have any
paper manuals, but I do have several CDs.
> Man-pages on niload and nidump might help too. Honestly, I never remember
> how to do it so I just improvise and create a local NI hierarchy and
> use DNS for name resolution.
I read them, and realised they didn't tell me enough, mainly because I
don't understand the rest of it.
> The chapter did mention NIS (yp) so that *might* be an option.
No, NIS is *never* an option ;-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On July 19, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> I've not been looking at the DEC gear recently, but last I did look the number
> of Alpha boardc and CPUs seemed to have gone down drastically. I think
> the supply is drying up. Seriously, unless you need 64-bit, or are like me
> and running OpenVMS, the question becomes, why? What you're going to be
> able to find and afford isn't going to be that fast compared to a
> Pentium III or IV Motherboard and processor which is likely to cost less.
I dunno, man. *I* sure won't run Intel-architecture machines.
I'd be seriously surprised if Alphas were drying up. There were a
LOT of them made. Machines of which there were far fewer, and that
are far older, can still be found readily.
Having no better explanation, I respectfully submit that this
"shortage" of Alpha hardware is due to random market fluctuations.
-Dave McGuire
> On July 20, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
> > > Having no better explanation, I respectfully submit that this
> > > "shortage" of Alpha hardware is due to random market fluctuations.
> >
> > I wonder how much of it is due to businesses sucking up spares to keep
> > their real work going for the long term now that Compaq has EOLed the
> > line (prematurely, many would say!!)
>
> That would be downright silly, because they haven't EOLed the
> line...they've announced that the WILL EOL it, in what should be a
> couple of years.
There is a lot of panic about the future EOL of the Alpha, with
a lot of people equating that to the end of OpenVMS, which is
wrong. This is just another architecture transition. I would
have preferred that the Alpha go on, but the real point is the
OS, not the CPU.
I can see people trying to stock up spares ahead of the EOL,
though. It would be better to grab them while they are
plentiful and cheap than to wait until the EOL when people
will want to stockpile some of the items that will be harder
to get later.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
On July 20, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
> > Having no better explanation, I respectfully submit that this
> > "shortage" of Alpha hardware is due to random market fluctuations.
>
> I wonder how much of it is due to businesses sucking up spares to keep
> their real work going for the long term now that Compaq has EOLed the
> line (prematurely, many would say!!)
That would be downright silly, because they haven't EOLed the
line...they've announced that the WILL EOL it, in what should be a
couple of years.
-Dave McGuire
Hey Eric...
Yes, it'd be great to put together a learning system that way, IF the person
had the skill and determination to pull it off. This very scenario is why I
suggested (back on Sunday I think) that a good way to go would be to pick up
a 68HC11 Evaluation Board (EVBU or EVM). My EVBU (which is currently built
into a little robot) already HAS:
- serial port
- monitor & assembler/disassembler program (Buffalo)
- 1k EEPROM
- wire wrap area
- real-time clock
- assembler & download software
- five ports:
A - pulse counters or general I/O
B - parallel output or address selection if using ext. RAM/ROM
C - parallel I/O or address/data port if using ext. RAM/ROM
D - two comm ports or general I/O
E - eight analog inputs or general inputs
Joel A. Weder
jweder(a)telusplanet.net
403-556-4020
Well, I didn't find a Symbolics LispM nor did I find a -64 Mustang but I
did find Programming the PET/CBM by West and Pet/CBM Personal Computer
Guide by Adam Osborne and Carrol S. Donahue. I also found a Simon's Basic
module + Docs.
Programming the PET/CBM was an especially nice find, since the only
version I had previously was an old photocopy and the book is in
mint condition.
Now I can probably get enough motivation to actually fix my 3040 (or was it
4040). Still looking for that Mustang.
--
jht
I recently acquired a load of 9 track tapes from eBay. What a deal, I only
paid 1 cent for a trunk load of tapes. In there, I found an original DEC
RSX11M+ (3.0) distribution, several DECUS RSX SIG tapes from the fall of
1981 to the spring of 1987 and a bunch of other miscellaneous tapes!
I put a list of most of the tapes up on my www site:
http://www.dadaboom.com/pdp11/software/tapes.html .
If copies are not available elsewhere, I was planning on duping the RSX SIG
tapes and putting them up on my www site. I won't be putting the RSX
distribution online due to the copyright infringement problems :-(
Now the questions
1.) Would having the tapes on-line be useful?
2.) If so, what's the best way to dup them and make them available for
download?
I have a PDP-11 running RT-11 (v5.03) and a uVAX-III running VMS v5.5. I can
hook my 9 track tape drive (TS05) up to either of them. I'd bet VMS would be
the better bet, but I'm not sure about the best way to dup them so that they
would be useful for the rest of the world.
Help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Bill
> I might be interested in a PC164 and CPU, if you have a spare...
I don't have any spare CPUs, but you can generally find those
on eBay.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
> > I've got a few spare Alpha motherboards sitting around.
> > I've got PC164, EB164, and PC64 motherboards. If anyone
> > needs any as a spare, let me know.
>
> What are the differences? I have a "noname" board, AT form-factor. I think
> it's the AXPPci133 or something similar. I got it running *BSD off of the
> SCSI port a long time ago and haven't done much with it in the past year.
The PC164 supports the 21164A, the EB164 supports the 21164, and the
PC64 supports the 21064A.
> Thought about trying to follow those instructions for loading OpenVMS. It's
> really low on the priority scale.
I installed OpenVMS on my Multia and added it to my cluster,
but one of the patches broke something and the Multia quit
being able to boot into the cluster. I later upgraded to
V7.2-1 and the Multia patch doesn't work with that version.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
On Jul 19, 21:06, Bob Shannon wrote:
> Don Maslin wrote:
> > Rather minor correction - the Winchester rifle used 3030 caliber
> > ammunition, but there were a number of models, the most famous being
> > either the '94 or '96 (I'm having brain fade!).
> Isn't that .308 for the 30-30. Maybe your thinking of the 303, which
used
> .311?
Yes, the name 30-30 comes from the 30-calibre bullet (which is actually
.308") and the original load was 30 grains of powder.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On July 19, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> >No, they're large, heavy and winchesters (HDA which can only be repaired
> >in a clean room).
>
> AFAIK winchester is just old nomenclature for fixed disks. What do you mean by
> winchesters?
The term "winchester" (taken from the IBM 3030 disk drive) implies a
sealed HDA which cannot (or should not) be opened in an "ordinary"
environment.
-Dave McGuire
"William King" <wrking(a)dadaboom.com> writes:
> I'm going to pursue the possibility that it's legal to post the RSX11M+ v
> 3.0 distribution on-line. I think I'd like to have a signed agreement with
> Mentec that this will be okay.
When you ask them, make sure that you tell them that it's for use with
Supnik's SIMH, for which it is *already* licensed. Otherwise they'll
almost certainly say "no".
For that matter, I personally wouldn't have asked, since it's clear
that Supnik did already arrange a license (for SIMH only). At this point,
if they say "no", it will really muddy the issue.
In general, when you ask a company for permission to do anything, the
answer will be "no", just because that's the safe and easy answer, and
doesn't involve any research or lawyers. So when one already has
permission to do something, asking for permission again can only cause
grief.
Note: I'm speaking entirely of the general case; none of this is intended
in any way to be critical of Mentec.
I've got a few spare Alpha motherboards sitting around.
I've got PC164, EB164, and PC64 motherboards. If anyone
needs any as a spare, let me know.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Is there any progress on the stuff-for-sale website, Sellam?
I was just thinking: how about setting up a similar page for
where-stuff-can-be found? For example, I ran across an RH780
massbus controller today in a salvage shop today -- new in its
shipping box, the whole set of cards in a backplane. I don't
want it, and I don't think many of the subscribers of this list
would want to get a few dozen emails of this sort every day, but
it would be nice to be able to record the information.
I picture a website where you could enter items found in shops
as well as personal inventories of things we'd part with if
asked. Location, item, price if known, date spotted, etc; and a
way of checking it off: "gone", "I bought it", "it blew up",
etc. A sort of very narrow inventory system for the world's
scrap shops and basements.
Would this be useful, or would it just make it too easy for
dealers to vacuum up all the good stuff? Impossible to keep up-
to-date, or worth the occasional stale entry?
What do y'all think?
Brian
On July 19, Chuck McManis wrote:
> > > AFAIK winchester is just old nomenclature for fixed disks. What do you
> > mean by
> > > winchesters?
> >
> > The term "winchester" (taken from the IBM 3030 disk drive) implies a
> >sealed HDA which cannot (or should not) be opened in an "ordinary"
> >environment.
>
> Does anyone know the actual reason that IBM picked the term "winchester" ?
There are two reasons...First, it was developed in Winchester,
England, and stored 30MB on each of two platter surfaces. Second, the
model number, 3030, made people think of the Winchester model 3030
rifle.
-Dave McGuire
I fell behind in my reading and was catching up today when I came across
Joel A. Weder's <jweder(a)telusplanet.net> posting from 8 Jun 2001 and the
responses on Eproms.
One of my recent hauls included a box of Eproms. There was around 100
tubes of 2708/2716/2732. A rough count shows around 1000 2708's, and
125 or so each of the 2716's & 2732's. Since I will never need that
many, I would like to make them available to the list.
For now and to be fair to all list members, I was thinking of dividing them
up into 45 (2708 35 ea, 2716 5 ea, 2732 5 ea) to a small box. I'll ask $5
per box to cover shipping and handling.
If you really want more than one box, we'll wait and see after those wanting
just one box have had their chance and then figure out shipping for 'bulk'
orders.
Mike Thompson
On July 19, Don Maslin wrote:
> > > > > AFAIK winchester is just old nomenclature for fixed disks. What do you
> > > > mean by
> > > > > winchesters?
> > > >
> > > > The term "winchester" (taken from the IBM 3030 disk drive) implies a
> > > >sealed HDA which cannot (or should not) be opened in an "ordinary"
> > > >environment.
> > >
> > > Does anyone know the actual reason that IBM picked the term "winchester" ?
> >
> > There are two reasons...First, it was developed in Winchester,
> > England, and stored 30MB on each of two platter surfaces. Second, the
> > model number, 3030, made people think of the Winchester model 3030
> > rifle.
>
> Rather minor correction - the Winchester rifle used 3030 caliber
> ammunition, but there were a number of models, the most famous being
> either the '94 or '96 (I'm having brain fade!).
Ahh, I understand. Thanks for the correction...my knowledge of gun
technology is very limited.
-Dave McGuire
On Jul 19, 14:25, John Allain wrote:
> Test =99% ?
>
> Hoping this turns off most if not all of the text encoding
> that MS so thoughtfully provided for me <g>.
Not quite, it still is using a non-standard character set:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-user-defined"
Can anyone tell John how to set the character set to ISO-8859-1 (or ASCII)
in Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>My only gripe is that the Cisco 675 DSL router/modem they sold me MUST be
>in routing mode, not bridging mode, and it does not have the capability to
>do port forwarding. <sigh> So you can't run a server to save your soul.
So what's the deal with that? The Cisco wants to route to some IP address,
fair enough just make the target of that IP address another router that
happens to be running NAT, a Firewall, etc. A VAX works great for this, or
an old PC, or a junked laptop, etc.
You don't need port forwarding to run a server, you only need either a
static IP address or a rendezvous protocol for finding your server.
--Chuck
Fred,
Where was I during VCF? Probably tiling my bathroom. I'm relatively
new to the list, so I haven't done any VCFs yet. The one in two
weeks is too far away - I'm in Minnesota.
Tony always elaborates. :-) That's a good thing.
Tony:
I hadn't realized that on a PC w/ CGA that the light pen was getting
help from the CRT controller. That explains how a relatively simple
device can report positioning information - it doesn't, the video
card is doing it.
So here's a trick question .. what happens when a person holds
a lightpen to a dark section of the screen. Is the lightpen
completely blind unless come pixel is lit up?
Thanks,
Mike
Wow, I feel like I've contributed something here. I started
a long running thread that didn't involve the 4th of July
or gun control!
Ok, forget the dry humor. Thank you all, now I know more about
light pens than I would have imagined possible. The $65536
question now is, how do I get a hold of one? I'd like to try
it on my 6845 video controller based machine (PCjr CGA). I'm
willing to learn to solder if necessary. :-)
On Jul 18, 22:51, Richard Erlacher wrote:
> Say ... Which Apple OS is the ][e supposed to run? I have checked out
that IIe
> and it appears to work OK, but I've not yet found a bootable diskette.
Does it
> run the same DOS as the ][+?
Yes. The ones I've seen were supplied with Apple DOS 3.3, but they will of
course run ProDOS if you have the disks.
> Apparently the ][e uses a serial printer. Perhaps I should have looked
around
> for that. It uses a wierd PS/2-like connector to communicate with the
thing.
Out of the box, an Apple //e didn't have a printer port fitted. That would
be an add-on. Most common option in my experience is a parallel card,
usually fitted to slot #1, but there's no reason you could use a serial
card (typically in slot #2) instead.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Gunther Schadow wrote:
> I bought a VT420 from a neighborhood garage sale ($5) that
> turned out not to work. <snip>
> Opened the box and powered on, the kathode in the tube didn't
> seem to glow. More inspection turned out that what seems like
> a ceramic capacitor was exploded or fried, all black and
> crummy, impossible for me to identify its specs. Can someone
> help me out with a schematics or databook or something?
> the blown-up capacitor is C621.
I popped the hood of a VT420 and the only markings I found on
C621 was "1J250". My years of electronics leave me with out an
opinion as to what the actual value is. As you know, that capacitor
is located inside the confines of a heatsink. That is the heatsink on
the horizontal output transistor. Without a schematic, I would guess
that capacitor is associated with the horizontal output transistor or
possibly is in the flyback transformer circuit. Experience has taught
me that is best to check the windings on the flyback, albiet hard to
do without a schematic. More times than I care to remember, I have
found a bad flyback. At that point it goes out the back door, I just
don't mess with them anymore like I used to. Granted there are
companies out there that sell replacement flybacks, but the prices
almost lead to the decision to pitch the one unit and use the money
instead to buy several others and hope for better luck.
Mike
> My understanding of the Mentec hobby license only covered use fo rthe
> emmulators, not real hardware.
>
> Am I mistaken?
>
> Gary
No, you are not mistaken. It is only good for emulators from DEC, which
covers simh up to about version 2.3d, it is unknown if the latest version is
still covered. Of course the only thing I'm using the latest version for is
the PDP-10 emulation so I can run TOPS-10 :^)
Zane
I have been involved in the installation of 5 ISDN, 7 cable modem and 2 DSL
installations. One of the DSL installations never went live. The other
works, sort of, now being replaced by Cable Modem.
DSL
SWBell was unable to handle having a router and then wanted us to remove the
sniffer we were using to troubleshoot the line. I was lucky the police
didn't arrive when the DSL and the alarm system phone line couldn't coexist.
I also didn't enjoy crawling under beds and furniture to place filters on
all of the phone jacks. Unable to authenticate unless connected, unable to
connect unless authenticated.
Cable Modem
I have lost service twice due to creatures eating my coax cable. It's now
routed through a pipe and they instead chewed my phone line last night. I
think they are squirrels, "rats with tails".
ISDN
My nightmares have almost subsided from these installations. If you hear
the work ISDN start drinking immediately. The installation crews want to
leave all of the problems to the service crews. Configuring ISDN modems is
a nightmare, SPID=profanity.
All of the companies have no clue about support. First level wants you to
reinstall your operating system. Second level reads script and will call
you back. System status knowledge is always a joke. I've called in after a
1/2 hour server outage and been told the system was never down. My first
troubleshooting technique is to call several of my neighbors who have cable
modem and ask if their systems are up. My last cable eaten by squirrel
adventure, the TV still worked by the modem wouldn't connect. Download speed
only varies a little, slower about 6-7 PM.
I'm troubled by the desire of companies to provide mission critical services
over consumer quality telecommunication and computer equipment.
Mike
mmcfadden(a)cmh.edu
Hi there,
I was given this e-mail address from a person who wanted to buy my 860 IPS,
but couldn't afford the high cost of shipping it out East. So, he suggested I
send a note to this mail list to see if anyone there may want it. The stats
for it are:
Xerox 860 IPS (circe 1980 or so)
Printer
Full page monitor with a portrait orientation (so you see the full page)
2 8 inch disc drives
COM card (I'm really not sure what this is for)
Operating system disc
Word processing disk
Utilities disc
As far as I know, the system still works, although I haven't powered it on
in quite awhile. Its been residing in my garage for the last year or so, so
you may want to make sure all the cards are seated nicely before turning it on.
Otherwise, it works just fine -- I used to use it for work processing until I
got a PC. Anyway, it'd be an "as-is" agreement. Of course the price is right
-- free!
For any further info on this beast, feel free to e-mail me at my home
address (this is my work account): loki(a)visi.com
Also, keep in mind that I live in Saint Paul, Minnesota, and its *very*
expensive to ship any great distance. If anyone is interested in aquiring this
system they'll really want to come and pick it up.
Thanks!
Pat Thielen
651-501-8067
loki(a)visi.com
www.axolotyl-studios.com
My understanding of the Mentec hobby license only covered use fo rthe
emmulators, not real hardware.
Am I mistaken?
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerome Fine [mailto:jhfine@idirect.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:59 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: New find: DECUS RSX SIG Tapes
>
>
> >William King wrote:
>
> > I recently acquired a load of 9 track tapes from eBay. What
> a deal, I only
> > paid 1 cent for a trunk load of tapes. In there, I found an
> original DEC
> > RSX11M+ (3.0) distribution! I won't be putting the RSX
> > distribution online due to the copyright infringement problems :-(
>
> Jerome Fine replies:
>
> Since I the only operating system I use from the PDP-11 is RT-11,
> I have no interest at all in RSX-11. But I have seen a
> number of others
> who are very interesting in running RSX-11 as a hobby user.
>
> Based on what Zane Healy just provided about the Mentec hobby
> license AND the fact that V5.03 of RT-11 is available from two
> sites to be downloaded. I just provided those URLs in my last post -
> if anyone missed them, here they are again:
> ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/digital/sim/software/
> for the file
> ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/digital/sim/software/rtv53swre.tar.Z
> And the other is:
> ftp://minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/pub/PDP-11/Sims/Supnik_2.3/software/
> for the file
>
ftp://minnie.cs.adfa.edu.au/pub/PDP-11/Sims/Supnik_2.3/software/rtv53swre.ta
r.gz
>
> It seems to me (as a non-lawyer) that a similar download for RSX11M+ V3.00
> should be totally accepted by Mentec in the same manner.
>
> >Now the questions
> > 1.) Would having the RSX11M+ V3.00 tape on-line be useful?
>
> YES!
>
> > 2.) If so, what's the best way to dup them and make them available for
> > download?
>
> I don't know if Megan Gentry can arrange to add RSX-11, but probably
> "minnie" would be glad to accept the file. That way everything would be
> managed in the same manner.
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> Jerome Fine
Test =99% ?
Hoping this turns off most if not all of the text encoding
that MS so thoughtfully provided for me <g>.
John A.
----- Original Message -----
From: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com>
To: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 2:19 PM
>> Test
// Test \\
My take on learning microprocessors:
1) Pick a reasonable processor. An 8085, Z80,
6502, or 680x is reasonable. A Pentium III is
not.
2) Read the data sheets. Get an idea of what the
timing requirements are, how you interface to
the timing, address, data, and I/O. Don't rely
on other people's schematics unless you absolutely
have no idea what you should do. Make sure after
using other people's schematics that you do under-
stand what they did and why.
3) Build a simple circuit on a large wire-wrap
board. Include the processor, minimal ROM,
minimal RAM, and a simple I/O port with eight
LEDs attached. Write a small program to write
different values to the LEDs. Verify they are
correct. Use a wire-wrap board with enough room
to add lots of stuff later. You'll be glad of
the room later.
4) Add a serial I/O port. Write a small program to
read data from a terminal (or equivalent) and
echo the data back.
5) Start extending the program to write your own
machine language monitor. You've got the I/O
routines. Add the functions one or two at a
time, testing along the way. You'll want to
add memory read, memory write, memory fill,
register read, register write, port read,
port write, program start, breakpoints, but
not a disassembler or assembler. Learn the
machine code first. Later you can add the
assembler/disassembler.
6) Add some kind of program storage, either out
through the serial port, through an additional
serial port (adding another shouldn't be
difficult), or some other way. Be creative.
7) Go off on your own. Experiment. Add some
A/D converters. Add some D/A converters.
Whatever you find interesting. But the most
important point to remember is to understand
the whats and whys of everything you do.
Step (5) is probably the one you'd be most tempted to
cheat on, but it really isn't that difficult to roll
your own. If you'd like, after you've got the basic
functions going, you can either add features from
some other monitor program, or use a completely
different monitor program modified to work with your
system, but definitely write the basics yourself so
you know what's going on.
Any comments?
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net