> A friend has a 9 gig Seagate drive and an Adaptec 1542C card and is
> having a helluva time getting it to work with a late model
> motherboard.
> boots okay from an IDE drive, but the aforementioned setup
> hangs almost
> every time.
>
> Do you know of an incompatibility with the drive and card;
> i.e. too much
> drive for the scsi bios to understand???
The card has trouble with high transfer rates. The on-board
BIOS allows you to limit that to 5MB/s; when I slowed it down
to that, it worked fine for me. YMMV (rather, HMMV), etc...
-dq
> Now I'm thinking that the "T" in "10BaseT", "100BaseT4", etc. and the T in
> the line capacities "T-1", "T-2", etc. are the same thing.
> Is that true?
I thought the 'T' in 'T1' stood for "trunk", as in trunk line...
-dq
Some real vintage (although "computer" would be stretching it) docs looking for a GOOD home: IBM 402/403 & associated peripherals manuals & some schematics.
mike
In a message dated 10/15/01 10:41:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
mythtech(a)Mac.com writes:
<< There are two different products with the name Hard Disk 20. One is the
Apple Hard Disk 20 SC and it is a SCSI device. There were also 40, 80 and
I think 160 mb versions (and maybe others in larger sizes).
BUT... predating that was a "Macintosh Hard Disk 20" that was not scsi.
Rather is was some drive (don't know what kind, but MFM seems sensible
enough) that used a special adaptor board that enabled it to plug into
the disk drive port on a bunch of the older macs. It was all enclosed
(drive, power supply, adaptor board) in one nice zero footprint beige
case (back when beige meant brown, and not grey like "beige" computers of
today).
They are two totally different drives, sold at two different time periods
(although, I do believe they overlapped for a while, until the SCSI
version completely replaced the disk drive version).
-chris >>
I have a couple of those hard disk 20s that still work, one was recovered
>from a trash bin with a professor's work still intact! I have a mac128, but
has an aftermarket board in it that upgrades it to a plus class machine, but
I do know it works just fine with the 512k models I have. even though it's 20
meg, disk access is only about as fast as the floppy drive.
--
DB Young Team OS/2
old computers, hot rod pinto, barbie's rocket motorhome and more at:
www.nothingtodo.org
>> was designed to work with older non scsi macs (128k 512k), and could be
>> daisy chained thru the disk drive ports
>
>Are you SURE? I have an HD20 which works just fine on a Plus, but which I
>have NEVER been able to make work on a 128k. My 512k has video problems
>and I haven't had a chance to sort those out so I can test the HD20 on it.
I was almost 100% positive that I once had it working on a 128k, but a
search of apple's TIL shows that the HD20 works with the 512ke, Plus, SE,
Classic, IIci, and Portable... so I guess I never took it lower than my
Plus (I never owned either of the 512's). This is going to be a head
scratcher for me for some time... I distinctly remember hooking it up to
my 128. (I can picture sitting in front of the table working on it... I
guess I must have failed in my attempts, but I could have sworn I was
successful)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>I think I've got an old Hard Disk 20 and it's a SCSI device. I'll have to
>find
>the lid to see what it says on it, though. It seems to me that it's an
>old MFM
>drive with a customed up SCSI bridge adapter on it.
There are two different products with the name Hard Disk 20. One is the
Apple Hard Disk 20 SC and it is a SCSI device. There were also 40, 80 and
I think 160 mb versions (and maybe others in larger sizes).
BUT... predating that was a "Macintosh Hard Disk 20" that was not scsi.
Rather is was some drive (don't know what kind, but MFM seems sensible
enough) that used a special adaptor board that enabled it to plug into
the disk drive port on a bunch of the older macs. It was all enclosed
(drive, power supply, adaptor board) in one nice zero footprint beige
case (back when beige meant brown, and not grey like "beige" computers of
today).
They are two totally different drives, sold at two different time periods
(although, I do believe they overlapped for a while, until the SCSI
version completely replaced the disk drive version).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I have seen the boards out of one of the minutemen missile computers. IIRC
they are very interesting Boards composed of discrete components. Anyone who
has a full computer is very lucky. I would consider it to be an extremely
rare collectable.
The Boards that I saw were about 4"X6" and heavily plated in gold then
lacquered. They are very pretty. I would love to see a whole computer.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
I don't think the one that he's talking about is SCSI, it plugs directly
into the floppy port on a Mac 128k or Mac 512K. ISTR, using one on a newer
Mac Plus instead of a SCSI drive as I needed something of that formfactor
and that was all I could get my hands on at the time.
Based on how it's used, I'm guessing you're right about it being a MFM
drive, but I suspect it's some wierd sort of bridge in it.
Zane
> I think I've got an old Hard Disk 20 and it's a SCSI device. I'll have to find
> the lid to see what it says on it, though. It seems to me that it's an old MFM
> drive with a customed up SCSI bridge adapter on it.
>
> Dick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris" <mythtech(a)Mac.com>
> To: "Classic Computer" <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:39 PM
> Subject: IIgs using hard disk 20
>
>
> > Does anyone know if an Apple IIgs can use an old Macintosh Hard Disk 20.
> > The Mac HD is NOT scsi, but rather uses the disk drive port on a Mac. It
> > was designed to work with older non scsi macs (128k 512k), and could be
> > daisy chained thru the disk drive ports (at one point, I think I had 3 HD
> > 20s and a 400k drive connected to my 128k Mac).
> >
> > The IIgs has a disk drive port, and visually, the 3.5" drive I have for
> > it looks just like the 3.5" drive I have off an old Mac Classic (I have
> > to go off visual, as the one from the Classic has no labels or other
> > markers beyond the apple logo... don't know why, that is the way it was
> > when it was given to me).
> >
> > I was hoping maybe they used the same ports, and I might be able to use
> > the HD 20 with my IIgs so I can add a hard drive to it.
> >
> > Anyone info would be great.
> >
> >
> >
> > -chris
> >
> > <http://www.mythtech.net>
> >
> >
>
Rocket science is in the rocket engine. Navigation is
not that hard, comparatively...
At 03:12 PM 10/15/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Let's hope they're all bought up by domestic hobbyists...
>
>;-)
>
>-dq
--------------------------------------------------------------
Carlos E. Murillo-Sanchez carlos_murillo(a)nospammers.ieee.org
Anyone have one of these in use and could possibly be a source for a copy of
the manual, disks, etc? Just bought one on auction but of course no docs or
software and this is NOT SCSI to the server, it works on the LAN and has
SCSI drives in it. Even if someone can send me the manual so I can scan or
copy it and send it back that would be great too and maybe I might have
something excess here (besdies actual cash to pay the shipping and materials
back) to express my thanks.
Russ Blakeman
Clarkson, KY USA
John,
Gee, just dumpstered 3 System 3's and 2 CS100's; since we're now shipping all our Toronto garbage to Michigan, ya coulda stopped at the dump on your way back & picked them up as well :-)
However, although the rest of the chassis (2xCS420, 2xCS300, 1xCS2H, 3xCS1H, 1xSystem3, 1xZ2, BRZII, C5 etc., and nice and clean at that), will probably have to go as well 'cause nobody wants to come up here to the frozen north, the cards, manuals & software may be around a little longer, so let me know if ya need anything.
mike
----------------------
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 18:54:05 -0500
From: "John R. Keys Jr." <jrkeys(a)concentric.net>
Subject: Cromemco Pick-up on 10-13-01
This pass Saturday was a long drive MN to IL (12 hours total drive time)
to pick up 2- Cromemco System Three's, a Systemv CS-300, one new in the
box KB for these systems, lots of manuals and software for them, a
Cipher 1600BPI tape unit, a model BRZ-III fan for the units, and some
parts. All will have to be cleaned up as they are pretty dirty and need
some loving care. The guy had over 1600sq feet of computer stuff he is
selling most on eBay.:-( At a local thrift I got some Sega master
stuff, like the 3D glasses that have been selling on eBay for $50, I got
mine for a couple dollars. Got a Virtual Boy system for $11.99. Got
some Atari 2600 stuff also they were selling cartridges for 80 cents and
they had two big boxes full. Now I will start the clean-up and entering
all the info into the database (my paper notebooks). Keep computing John
Ah, yes, remember them well, and the mechanical B series they replaced; might even still have some parts and ledger cards... Those were the days, programming with metal punches and tweaking and debugging with a file... made great desks when they were scrapped...
But while on this topic, anybody out there doing anything with Burroughs L series or B80/90 systems? Have tossed most of it out, but still have some cards, manuals and a cassette drive with controller if anyone's at all interested.
And of course some paper and mylar tape stuff...
And some Burroughs calculator manuals, mechanical and electronic..
mike
----------------------------
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 17:29:07 -0500
From: "Patrick L. Boland" <plboland(a)home.com>
Subject: Re: Burroughs E6000
As late as 1977 ! was using two Burroughs E6000 computers to perform the
function of loan payment application. The loans were for health club
membership in the Chicago area and a great deal of the rest of the upper
midwest area. We had over 50,000 loans outstanding at any time and
processed from 1,000 to 3,000 loan payments a day. The machines we had were
magnetic stripe ledger card readers and they would punch an output card
with the results of the processing of the transaction. The latest
information about the loan kept on a master deck of cards was replaced with
the card that was punched as a result of the transaction on the E6000. The
update was performed on a daily basis using the 085 sorter and a
reproducer/collater. During the last 8 to 12 months of the use of the
E6000, while a conversion was being worked on, we used only one E6000 and
kept the other one for spare parts. Burroughs had run out of spare parts.
I have mirrored the three scsi documents to my own site. I will keep them up and available for the forseeable future. http://agamemnon.unixboxen.net/scsi
>> I think I still have mine, and in working condition. Although I would not
>> be willing to part with it (thus why I think I still have it), I CAN open
>> it and send some digital pics of the chips. Maybe even draw out some
>> schematics.
>
>That would be helpful.
Ok, I will stop by my parents house tonight and pick mine up. Then
tomorrow when I am supposed to be working (who wants to work when you can
goof off), I will take it apart and take some pics. I will do what I can
for schematics (I'm not an EE, just a hobbiest, so they might not be
pretty, but I will try to make them correct).
Although I am sure they will laugh hysterically, have you thought of
contacting the game manufacturer? (Don't recall who it was, but I will
know tonight when I pick mine up)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Hi,
I've got a Olivetti M20 Z8001 PC, and it appears that once there was a
CP/M-8000 version available for it.
Has anyone got such thing? I'd be interested in this, I could swap
with some PCOS programs. (Assuming the copyright holder (Olivetti)
doesn't mind.)
regards,
chris
>Are you SURE? I have an HD20 which works just fine on a Plus, but which I
>have NEVER been able to make work on a 128k. My 512k has video problems
>and I haven't had a chance to sort those out so I can test the HD20 on it.
Not to double reply... but now I am going to start beating my head into a
wall.
Apple's technote article # 8169 (in the archives section), claims that
the only way to add a hard drive to the 128 and 512 is by using the HD20
non-scsi drive (the one in question here). This seems to contridict a
previous technote that lists the first supporting mac as the 512ke.
So now I am REALLY going to have to pull out my 128 and see what
happens... it seems Apple doesn't even know which way it goes.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>Won't work, simply because the floppy port on the GS doesn't have the
>firmware to support the HD20, while
>the early Macs did. But there are many better hard drive options for a
>GS, anyway.
I guess I will have to keep an eye out for a SCSI board for the IIgs.
Maybe I can also track down an original Apple HD SC... just to keep
everything matching.
So much for using parts on hand <sigh>
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> Well, I still go for a variation of Murphey's law, which I found
> to fit at least my experiance:
>
> As soon as you aquired someting you belive to be truly rate and
> unique, A second incarnation will popup close thereafter.
>
> And as a bylaw it's stated:
>
> The price asked for the second item is as lower as more you did
> spend on the first.
>
I always refer to it as the Law of Affinity;
I saw it printed in a WWII collectors catalogue in the 80's and it
stuck
Objects have an affinity for each other equivalent to
(5/number you have seen)^(price)
The corrolary runs;
After the first object, all subsequent objects have a maximum price of
(price you last paid/(number you own +1))
From: Iggy Drougge <optimus(a)canit.se>
>> Ahh, the 74LS181s are ALUs, as is the 'F582. Interesting that they
>>used both. I'm curious...what kind of processor is this?
>
>Am I the only one who finds it a bit perverse that there are 74xxx
standard
>TTL circuits for such complex functions as ALUs? I thought that the way
to go
>would be to construct it out of simpler TTL circuits, such as all the
740x
>gates, not buying it as a package. I suppose I'm not used to the concept
of
>single 74xxx circuits carrying out such complex tasks.
It was the second generation before really complex LSI actually the '181
was
likely the highest gate count part in the class before the TI bit slices
(74881-884).
It's also very old but still a handy part as it does all the standard
arithmetic ops
and logical ones too. The ALU core of the 2901 is basically the 74181.
Allison
Why not. they were demil'ed and made available to colleges and
any one else that could deal with the 30someodd inches diameter
by 20 inches tall "slice". It wanted three voltages and one whole
whopping amount of power. PITA to cool as well. I'ts been 30 years
since i've seen/played with one.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Buckle <geneb(a)deltasoft.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: looking for documentation for 1963 minuteman missile
computer
>> I'm looking for documentation for a 1963 minuteman missile navigation
>> computer. Any leads would be appreciated.
>>
>*spits coffee on monitor*
>
>You're kidding, right?
>
>g.
>
>
>
It also appears in the LQ02 printer logic and the RX01 disk ucontroller.
It was a popular TTL 4bit ALU slice.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire(a)neurotica.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: Unknown IC
>On October 15, Tony Duell wrote:
>> > > Ahh, the 74LS181s are ALUs, as is the 'F582. Interesting that
they
>> > >used both. I'm curious...what kind of processor is this?
>> >
>> > Am I the only one who finds it a bit perverse that there are 74xxx
standa=
>> > rd
>> > TTL circuits for such complex functions as ALUs? I thought that the
way t=
>>
>> Actually, what suprises me is how _simple_ the 74181 gate schematic is
>> (it's published in most TTL databooks). It doesn't take that long to
>> understand how it works.
>>
>> In terms of the transistor count, I suspect there are TTL chips which
are
>> more complex than the '181.
>
> The '181 is even used in the pdp11/04 and /34 if memory serves.
>Anyone know of any others?
>
> -Dave
>
>--
>Dave McGuire
>Laurel, MD
On October 15, Jan Koller wrote:
> > > How about MicroWave transmission ?
> > > Or data encoded onto laser beams?
> > > Or satellite bounced?
>
> Actually these three are probably something Dave McGuire
> could actually do. While the rest of us have watches and
> clocks, I heard through the grapevine he has his own fully
> functional Atomic Clock.
Uhh, yeah, I've done all three, but only the first two by myself. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
On Oct 15, 13:20, Derek Peschel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 11:18:10AM -0700, Ethan Dicks wrote:
>
> > 10BaseT can use CAT-3 or better. 16mbps Token Ring needs [...]
>
> Now I'm thinking that the "T" in "10BaseT", "100BaseT4", etc. and the T
in
> the line capacities "T-1", "T-2", etc. are the same thing. Is that true?
Maybe. The 'T' in "10baseT" etc is the same 'T' as in "UTP" -- unshielded
twisted pairs. I don't know what the 'T' in "T1" stands for. It might be
the same as one in "AT&T" since they coined the term, or it might mean
"twisted pair" because that's how T1 lines were originally made. T1, BTW,
is 1.544Mb/s, and T3 is 44.736Mb/s; AFAIK there's no such thing as T2. A
bit like ISDN; there's ISDN2, ISDN6, ISDN30, but no others.
> And is there a "10BroadT"? :)
Nope.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Oct 15, 11:18, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> --- "Eric J. Korpela" <korpela(a)ssl.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> > Just wired the house with Cat-5 this week. 10bT has the advantage that
> > it's also 100bT with a change of equipment.
>
> I know you probably know what you meant, but to me, that statement is
> misleading, or rather, to someone who knows little about networking,
> taking the second sentence out of context could lead trouble.
>
> phone wire - 2 pair or more, good for analog telephones
> CAT-3 - will pass 10mbps traffic (or analog telephone traffic)
> CAT-4 - good for token ring
> CAT-5 - good for most inexpensive networking technologies
> CAT-5e - needed for transmission technologies that put > 100mbps on
> a single pair.
>
> 10BaseT can use CAT-3 or better. 16mbps Token Ring needs CAT-5 or
> better. 100Base-TX needs CAT-5 (including CAT-5 jacks!) Don't recall
> what 100Base-T4 needs
Cat3
> Lotsa little fiddly details about the physical layer are covered up by
> robust layer 2 and layer 3 protocols. Without expensive sniffer hardware
> (Time Domain Reflectometer, anyone?), a lot of this stuff gets swept
under
> the rug until you are having fits when it doesn't work.
I couldn't agree more. Don't try to build a whole network (or long runs)
with stranded patch cord, for example.
> > (ISTR that you can use the
> > unused pair in the cable for LocalTalk, but I haven't yet tried it).
>
> Should be able to.
Just not at the same time as you're running 100baseTX up the same cable :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On October 14, Jim Donoghue wrote:
> Anybody know what a 74F582 is? 24-pin DIP, it's on a processor board along
> with several 74LS181's and various others. Thanks.
Ahh, the 74LS181s are ALUs, as is the 'F582. Interesting that they
used both. I'm curious...what kind of processor is this?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
I would be interested.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
[mailto:owner-classiccmp@classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Paul R. Santa-Maria
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 12:58 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: HP-UX items
I have acquired some HP-UX 9000 series 700/800
items that I have no clue about and no use for.
1. Two identical manuals: "Installing HP-UX 10.10 and
Updating from HP-UX 10.0x to 10.10."
2. Manual: "Support Media User's Manual
PA-RISC Computer Systems."
3. CD-ROMs: "HP Instant Information CD
HP-UX Release 10."
June 1998 and April 1998.
4. CD-ROM: "HP-UX Diagnostic/Independent Product
Release Media."
June 1998
5. CD-ROMs: "10.20 Hardware Extensions 2.0
HP-UX 10.20 Servers" April 1998
"HP-UX Extensions Software" April 1998
6. CD-ROM: "HP-UX Recovery Release 10.20"
7. Four CD-ROMs: HP-UX Applications Release 10.20"
Disks 1 through 4. June 1998.
Can anyone use these?
Paul R. Santa-Maria
Monroe, Michigan USA
Sounds a lot like a box I've been threatening to build for a while.
On the Ethernet side, I'd not worry about specific 10bT and ThickNet
segments. Instead, I'd run a single 10b2 (ThinNet) segment and get a 10bT
hub with a BNC uplink. This also had the advantage of saving you a slot in
the box. Don't worry about ThickNet, just pick up a couple of spare 10bT or
10b2 tranceivers for the odd box with an AUI port.
Since you've got LocalTalk running to the box, then I'd also run MacGate
which would let you run MacIP (IP over LocalTalk).
As for other fun topologies, you already mentioned TokenRing. My personal
choice would be to also add HomePNA (Ethernet over phonelines). The 1MB
HomePNA 1.0 cards (the only ones supported by Linux)are very cheap these
days. I picked up a pair from Computer Geeks (http://www.compgeeks.com) for
something like $12. Now if I could just find a cheap Ethernet/HomePNA bridge
for the Nubus Mac in the spare bedroom...
<<<John>>>
-----Original Message-----
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 12:50:01 -0500
From: Tarsi <tarsi(a)binhost.com>
Subject: ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies
Dear all,
I've decided that one of my goals is to run every networking topology
possible in my house, regardless if I actually NEED to run them or not. :)
My plan is to place 1 linux box running a card from each topology in it and
use that to bridge all (or almost all) topologies.
I currently have running 10bT ethernet, 10b2 ethernet, Localtalk over
PhoneNET and the beginnings of Arcnet.
In light of such, I have a series of questions:
1) Who knows some stuff about ArcNet? I've gotten 4 cards (8-bit ISA) and
a
16-port active hub. I've read somewhere that cards are either hubbable or
not. Any other info on that?
2) Anyone have any (I think it is) 93ohm coax arcnet patch cables that they
want to get rid of?
3) Anyone got good resources on ThickNET? (10b5 I think it is?) I know it
was run back in the day, and I know some precursory things about it (the
funky vampire taps, etc.) Anyone have either resources or hardware on this
topology that they'd like to share/sell/etc? :)
4) Any other interesting topologies I should try? I have plans to do:
Arcnet, FDDI, Token ring, Localtalk, 10b2, 10b5, 10bT, 10bTX, 10bFiber, and
(eventually) 802.11b wireless.
> What exactly IS Dark Tower? I've heard of Dork Tower (a comic book) but
>not Dark Tower. If you prefer to answer off list, that would be fine too
>8-)
Well, if the original poster was refering to what I had, then Dark Tower
is a board game (circa late 70's early 80's). The board was this roundish
board that you moved all over, and there was a dark brown plastic castle
thing that sat in the middle.
The object was, you were an adventurer, and you had to move about getting
things (treasures?) from each land (4 lands, 4 players IIRC). When it was
your turn, you would press a button on the tower (I think there was
"pass" for do nothing, "move" to go somewhere). It would then spin (well,
the inside would spin, the tower stayed still), and eventually stop,
telling you if you ran into enemy's, or treasures, or whatever. If it was
an enemy, you had to fight them, and it would track your possestions and
army strength, and would tell you how you did (how many people died, how
many of the enemy joined your ranks, if you got new possestions)
Basically, it was a 4 player, board game version along the lines of D&D
(and was out when D&D was in its hayday, something else I am afraid to
admit I was in to.).
I would be happy to pull mine out (I am sure it is in my parents basement
still, I have to go over there today anyway to fix my mother's computer),
and I can take some pics of it, and scan the directions if people want.
Of course, maybe the original poster was refering to some other Dark
Tower game, and I now look like a total ass (but the one I know of was
really cool, so even if I just get to tell others about it, it was worth
the typing).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
! Forgot to mention...
!
! There were SCSI-interfaced Ethernet adapters for
! SCSI-equipped Macs... got one of those, too...
I would like to get my hands on one, maybe 2 or 3 of these. Anyone got
spares?
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
On October 14, Tony Duell wrote:
> This is semi-off-topic (but only 'semi' as I repairing a computer
> peripheral that's over 10 years old...)
>
> I have come across a chip that I don't have the pinout of. It's a 4063,
> presumably 4000-series CMOS. The one in the device is made by RCA.
>
> >From the function in the circuit, I would guess it's some kind of 4 bit
> comparator.
>
> Does anybody have the pinouts (16 pin DIL). It's not in any of my CMOS
> databooks that I can find. If you do, could you please type them as a
> simple text file (as in
It is indeed a 4-bit comparator. Here is the pinout:
1 B3
2 IA<B
3 IA=B
4 IA>B
5 OA>B
6 OA=B
7 OA<B
8 gnd
9 B0
10 A0
11 B1
12 A1
13 A2
14 B2
15 A3
16 Vcc
Good luck,
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
On October 15, Iggy Drougge wrote:
> Am I the only one who finds it a bit perverse that there are 74xxx standard
> TTL circuits for such complex functions as ALUs? I thought that the way to go
> would be to construct it out of simpler TTL circuits, such as all the 740x
> gates, not buying it as a package. I suppose I'm not used to the concept of
> single 74xxx circuits carrying out such complex tasks.
An ALU isn't that complex, really. Find a TTL databook and look at
the logic diagram of a '181. There's not that much to it.
More complex and less "generic" than a 7400 quad NAND gate, sure...
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
Tony,
According to a datasheet downloaded from www.freetradezone.com (free
registration, and supposedly 12 million component datasheets -- I believe
it, as there's yet to be a part I haven't found)....
It's a CMOS 4-bit magnitude comparator...
1: B3
2: (A < B) IN
3: (A = B) IN
4: (A > B) IN
5: (A > B) OUT
6: (A = B) OUT
7: (A < B) OUT
8: VSS
9: B0
10: A0
11: B1
12: A1
13: A2
14: B2
15: A3
16: VDD
I can email the datasheet if you'd like.... It's a 220KB .PDF file...
Rich B.
"They that can give up essential liberty
to obtain a little temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety." -- Ben Franklin
> Jan Koller <vze2mnvr(a)verizon.net>:
>
> > Ahhhh, What are Chinese whispers?
>
> It's a game where you set up a chain of people, and
> whisper some message in the ear of the first one, who
> whispers it to the next one, etc. When it gets to the
> far end you compare it with the original message,
> usually with amusing results due to accumulation of
> errors along the way.
In Cub Scouts, we called this "The Telephone Game".
-dq
This last weekend I pulled my old rack mount
CompuPro system out of storage and cleaned it
up. The last time I used this system was about
15 years ago and I only used it to edit my resume
in Wordstar.
The system consists of:
a "CPU 8085/88"
a "DISK 1" controller
a "SYSTEM SUPPORT 1" for the console
two "RAM 16" boards for a total of 128K
and two Qume 842 8" floppy drives
After one small capacitor fire I had the system
up and running. I went through all of the 8"
diskettes I could find to determine what would boot.
So far, I have bootable disks for CP/M 2.2,
CP/M 86, and CP/M 8-16.
But the disks that I really want to read are in
86-DOS format according to the label. I have
disks that claim to be 86-DOS boot disks but
they wouldn't boot. Some of these disks I'm having
problems with appear to be SSSD 26 sectors/
128 bytes if that helps.
Can anyone point me in the direction I need
to go in order to be able to boot 86-DOS?
Regards,
--Doug
=========================================
Doug Coward
@ home in Poulsbo, WA
Analog Computer Online Museum and History Center
http://www.best.com/~dcoward/analog
=========================================
>> It's mostly lower end 8-bit software, but it might be worth a
peek...they're
>
>Sure, it's not 100% my main interest, but they might have something
that
>I need. Anyway, it can't hurt to look :-)
Is this the shop that has the owner's Altair in some
basement or other? Or am I misremembering
some other snippet?
Antonio
After finally getting my TU56/TD8E setup operational, I now
run into problems generating an OS/8 system tape.
The system keeps insisting that "TAPE #2 is not an original dec tape",
although i know for a fact that it is.
I have 3 sets of system tapes and all generate the same error.
Tape #1 is never asked for, the resulting tape is of course not usable.
Any clues what I'm doing wrong ?
Jos Dreesen
>Data encoded in the hand gestures of a person depicted in a video tape made
>available to the world.
This has been done. US military hostages and POWs have done this in the
past when being forced to give statements on behalf of their captors.
And I am sure US solders are not the only ones trained to do something
like this.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Sorry to be late to this topic. As it happens, I've got a DEC 3000/300X
(175MHz 21064, 64MB RAM, 2x2GB Disk, NetBSD 1.5.1 + fixes) in production.
I'm fond of it, but probably more for the fact that it comes in a rackmount
sled, which appears to be quite rare. It fits nice at the co-hosting
facility (it's www.thistle.com, but it doesn't talk to anyone but me right
now).
What I know:
Memory: No...you can't put just anything into it. It's got 8 72-pin SIMM
slots, but it will only accept 8MB, true parity, generic SIMMs (giving
64MB). And it's damn finicky about those. My 3000s spits on SIMMs that
everything else in the basement has no trouble with. It will also accept
Digital custom 32MB true parity SIMMs (giving 256MB). Nothing else that
I've found will work, but that could just be me. If anyone has any of these
SIMMs they don't want, do let me know...
Video: AFAIK, none of the free *nix systems support the built in TC frame
buffers. VMS and OSF/1, nee Tru64 do. The 3000 will run X clients and
display to another machine. Real men do serial consoles anyway.
Speed: Slow. Really slow. Not PC532 slow, but not something I'd trade one
of my PPro 200s for (other than the swanky rack-mount sled). Definately
useful for low volume web, mail, etc., but "make build" isn't pleasant. My
PC64-275 is way, way faster, but still not that fast.
There's lot's of good info out there, and I know there are people working to
support all that isn't currently supported. Drop me a note if anyone wants
to know anything else.
Ken
> > > > 4) Any other interesting topologies I should try?
>
> How about MicroWave transmission ?
>
> Or data encoded onto laser beams?
>
> Or satellite bounced?
How about Earth-Moon-Earth? Or data-encoded chromosomal strings? Hmm, or
fragrances (data stored in the molecules of a volatile chemical)?
Or --
Data encoded in the hand gestures of a person depicted in a video tape made
available to the world.
Networking, indeed.
Glen
0/0
On October 14, Jan Koller wrote:
> > A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.
>
> I hope you don't mind my asking, but is the US in disfavor with
> the citizens of New Zealand? And if so, why?
I was going to ask about that, but I didn't want to "make any
waves". :)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
> > Philip Pemberton wrote:
> >
> > > A while ago I got a Phonemark "Quick Data Drive", aparrently made
by
> > > Entrepo. It uses small endless-loop tape cartridges called "Wafers"
(any
> > > relation to the Rotronics Wafadrive? hmm...).
> > Try comp.sys.sinclair. Be advised that Entrepo made two types -- A and
B.
> > Same tape, different housing. I have A&J drives (one each A and B
type)
> > hung off my TS2068.
> Hmm... Live and learn.
> By TS2068 I assume you mean the Timex/Sinclair 2068.
Correct.
> > The drives are slow, and the tapes are extremely fragile, to the point
> that
> > I rarely use the drives any more, in order not to destroy my few
remaining
> > tapes.
> Urk! Time to get a few tapes in while they're still available :-)
> If the tape is that fragile, I might pull one apart and replace the tape
> with better quality tape.
I hope your eyes are better than mine -- these friggin things are *tiny.*
> Or I might design my own "stringy floppy" drive - even more fun!
The stringy floppy is flawed the same way an 8-track audio tape is -- it
only moves in one direction. As a result, A&J didn't write any OS for
their drives, just a couple of simple commands. You search for the file
you want, and you either find it (after several minutes) or you don't
(after several minutes).
> Anyone got a spare QOS wafer?
Nope.
Glen
0/0
On October 14, Jim Donoghue wrote:
> > Ahh, the 74LS181s are ALUs, as is the 'F582. Interesting that they
> > used both. I'm curious...what kind of processor is this?
>
> Wang CP-5 CPU board from a VS5E. 32-bit, loads cpu microcode from the system
> disk into static RAM chips on the CPU board. Strange, but interesting, stuff.
Ahh, neat! I've heard a bit about Wang VS systems, but I had no
idea they were TTL CPUs. Very cool. How wide is the processor? The
74LS181 is 4 bits wide...how many does it use?
Have you had a chance to take pics of this system? I'd be highly
interested in seeing them if so.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Laurel, MD
on 14-Oct-01 15:14:30, Jan Koller wrote:
>Wasn't AMD's chip an Am5x86-133 in reference to it's being
>a 5th generation 486 chip.
>I believe the Cyrix 586 was 486 series too. Their first
>Pentium level offering was the 686, wasn't it?
Cyrix made a 586 m1sc which was their 586 pentium clone
modified for use in a 486 motherboard, its the fast cpu
for 486 motherboards.
Regards Jacob Dahl Pind
--
CBM, Amiga,Vintage hardware collector
Email: Rachael_(a)gmx.net
url: http://rachael.dyndns.org
MicroTest is still around.. They sold off their NAS stuff, but a quick search
for
for 'NAS Microtest GPL violation' tells me the new company is xStore at
http://www.xstoreonline.com
Jim
On Monday, October 15, 2001 7:24 PM, Mike Ford [SMTP:mikeford@socal.rr.com]
wrote:
> > Anyone have one of these in use and could possibly be a source for a
> >copy of the manual, disks, etc? Just bought one on auction but of course
> >no docs or software and this is NOT SCSI to the server, it works on the
> >LAN and has SCSI drives in it. Even if someone can send me the manual so
> >I can scan or copy it and send it back that would be great too and maybe
> >I might have something excess here (besdies actual cash to pay the
> >shipping and materials back) to express my thanks. Russ Blakeman
> >Clarkson, KY USA
>
> I bought a MicroTest Discport at the last TRW, mine is just the put a CD
> ROM on the net box, but when I hunted I thought I found MicroTest was still
> around. OTOH I don't seem to have any software, so maybe they don't support
> it anymore ? If you find something let me know too.
>
This pass Saturday was a long drive MN to IL (12 hours total drive time)
to pick up 2- Cromemco System Three's, a Systemv CS-300, one new in the
box KB for these systems, lots of manuals and software for them, a
Cipher 1600BPI tape unit, a model BRZ-III fan for the units, and some
parts. All will have to be cleaned up as they are pretty dirty and need
some loving care. The guy had over 1600sq feet of computer stuff he is
selling most on eBay.:-( At a local thrift I got some Sega master
stuff, like the 3D glasses that have been selling on eBay for $50, I got
mine for a couple dollars. Got a Virtual Boy system for $11.99. Got
some Atari 2600 stuff also they were selling cartridges for 80 cents and
they had two big boxes full. Now I will start the clean-up and entering
all the info into the database (my paper notebooks). Keep computing John