In a message dated 11/2/2001 10:35:49 AM Central Standard Time,
fernande(a)internet1.net writes:
<< The NCR's were Microchannel weren't they?
Jim wrote:
> NCR 3230's.. Ugh. At least at EOL we could re-chip them, crank the
> clocks and toss regulators in for employees that wanted one. Nothing
> like seeing the message "486DX4 running at OVER 100mhz" and
> chuckling.
Ok, I guess if you've actually expereinced that, I can't very well tell
you that your wrong :-)
> But you are right, it could be that too. Reset to defaults and reconfig
> can't hurt. Just I've seen far more (FAR MORE!) with a weak battery.
>
> Jim
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA >>
yes, I know that certain NCR models were microchannel. I have a 3300 series
that's a 486dx and microchannel. very similar to a PS/2 9577.
I did read what he said. Sometimes in the early Compaq 486's (and
also late 486 Olivetti/NCR/AT&T) you get the error. Used to have a
slew of the monsters at work we got cheap to replace dying IBM's.
We replaced them with.. Wait for it.. I'll give you a hint, we were
bought by AT&T..
NCR 3230's.. Ugh. At least at EOL we could re-chip them, crank the
clocks and toss regulators in for employees that wanted one. Nothing
like seeing the message "486DX4 running at OVER 100mhz" and
chuckling.
But you are right, it could be that too. Reset to defaults and reconfig
can't hurt. Just I've seen far more (FAR MORE!) with a weak battery.
Jim
On Friday, November 02, 2001 2:46 AM, Chad Fernandez
[SMTP:fernande@internet1.net] wrote:
> re-read what he said..... he isn't loosing the configuration, it justs
> wants attention. I have had this happen before too. I just change
> things until it stops :-) I think something gets crossed up when
> changing things around too much, and it asks for F1 to be pressed. You
> can start over from scratch by pulling the battery..... I have had to do
> that once or twice when I really screwed things up, to the point that it
> hung while the bios was loading :-)
>
> Chad Fernandez
> Michigan, USA
>
> Mike Ford wrote:
> >
> > >Hmmm, that reminds me:
> > >
> > >I have an EISA Compaq 486sx at a client site from which I had to remove
> > >an add-on internal modem; ran the diagnostic/configuration program, it
> > >says everything's fine, but when it boots it stops waiting for F1 saying
> > >the configuration's incorrect. Press F1 to continue & everything works,
> > > just a nuisance 'cause it can't restart after a power failure without
> > >someone there to press F1.
> > >Any ideas?
> >
> > Check the cmos battery.
Hmmm... you don't use Windows much, do you...
------------------Original Message----------------
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:29:50 -0700
From: "Richard Erlacher" <edick(a)idcomm.com>
Subject: Re: hard-sector 5 1/4 disk
The way I seem to remember it is that, back then, we were amazed when things
worked, rather than being irked when they didn't. Apple's attitude was clearl,
though, and that was that if your data really mattered, you'd certainly use a
computer and not an Apple. The Apple wasn't designed from the ground up as a
computing machine, but rather as a video toy (not in the disparaging sense) on
the order of the several other video games of the time, which, coincidentally
could also do some computing. Apple's approach was that if people were willing
to buy an Apple and then use it for useful work, they'd try to charge as much as
they possibly could, since the overall cost ostensibly would be low initially,
and then they'd make their money on the disk drives, (where they had some real
margin) and other add-ons that it took to convert the Apple into a computer
capable of doing useful work.
What makes all this crystal clear is that if I fire up an Apple today, it still
does all the stupid disk-subsystem-related crap it did back then, only, by now,
nobody would even think of putting up with that. Back then, it was about par
for the course, but it wouldn't last a week in today's environment.
Those parts were never cheap!
You can also use 74289s for the '189s. The '382s are an improved version
of the '182. A note, if you can tolerate a slower ALU you can omit the
'382s
and just use ripple carry.
A sub for 74189s is some of the byte wide cache rams from an old 386/486
PC
as the faster ones were faster than the TTL 74189! You dont have to use
the full
space of the cache ram though having it would make afor an interesting
register array.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, November 01, 2001 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: classiccmp-digest V1 #761
>Somebody wrote
>> >
>> > While I agree that there are a lot of rack-mount random TTL junkies
here, to
>> > some of us, S-100 and things like that are "big iron" as well. =)
>> >
>
>Hey some of like TTL, too bad you can't get 7400's for 5 cents each
>anymore.
>I have a great idea for a great LS computer but no 74LS189's or
>74LS382's
>exist cheap. Ben Franchuk.
>
>--
>Standard Disclaimer : 97% speculation 2% bad grammar 1% facts.
>"Pre-historic Cpu's" http://www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk
>Now with schematics.
Anybody know what a DEC H9642 enclosure looks like or how big? The
NetBSD hardware reference says its two BA23s... but I need to know if
I can fit it into the back of a Kia Sportage. Pictures, anyone?
Given that, anybody want one (its a MicroVAX II) in the Austin area?
Free, you just have to come pick it up. I'm being given this as a "gotta
take this too" in addition to a PDP 11/53... and I dont have room for it
in the garage, nor do I have time to mess with it right now...
Bill
--
Bill Bradford
mrbill(a)mrbill.net
Austin, TX
Bad nicad for the CMOS, It's loosing a bit here or ther and checksumming.
That forces a bios error.
I had two like that, replaced the nicad and Viola!
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Chad Fernandez <fernande(a)internet1.net>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: EISA - was VLB SCSI?
>re-read what he said..... he isn't loosing the configuration, it justs
>wants attention. I have had this happen before too. I just change
>things until it stops :-) I think something gets crossed up when
>changing things around too much, and it asks for F1 to be pressed. You
>can start over from scratch by pulling the battery..... I have had to do
>that once or twice when I really screwed things up, to the point that it
>hung while the bios was loading :-)
>
>Chad Fernandez
>Michigan, USA
>
>Mike Ford wrote:
>>
>> >Hmmm, that reminds me:
>> >
>> >I have an EISA Compaq 486sx at a client site from which I had to remove
>> >an add-on internal modem; ran the diagnostic/configuration program, it
>> >says everything's fine, but when it boots it stops waiting for F1 saying
>> >the configuration's incorrect. Press F1 to continue & everything works,
>> > just a nuisance 'cause it can't restart after a power failure without
>> >someone there to press F1.
>> >Any ideas?
>>
>> Check the cmos battery.
>
From: John Allain <allain(a)panix.com>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: CPU design at the gate level
>>Not to mention relays->tubes->transistors->RTL->...
>
>Would Transistors enter in to the picture as RTL?
RTL Resistor Transistor Logic. Think very simple, basic gate is the NOR,
power hungry and SLOW. The basic two input NOR is two transistors
and three resistors.
I have a fair collection of RTL (914, 900, 923, MC7xx) from the '67ish time
frame
and have built DMMs and the like using them.
Allison
Easy. Just replace the bios battery.
Prolly a lithium button cell the size of a nickle in a holder near the BIOS,
if I remember right.
Jim
On Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:57 PM, M H Stein [SMTP:mhstein@usa.net] wrote:
> Hmmm, that reminds me:
>
> I have an EISA Compaq 486sx at a client site from which I had to remove
> an add-on internal modem; ran the diagnostic/configuration program, it
> says everything's fine, but when it boots it stops waiting for F1 saying
> the configuration's incorrect. Press F1 to continue & everything works,
> just a nuisance 'cause it can't restart after a power failure without
> someone there to press F1.
> Any ideas?
>
> Can give more details off-list if anyone can help.
>
> m
>
> ----------Original Message----------
> Date: 1 Nov 2001 1:11:30 +0100
> From: "Iggy Drougge" <optimus(a)canit.se>
> Subject: Re: VLB SCSI?
>
> ...What I dislike about either system is that it's so awfully software-based.
> IMO you can't really can't call MCA or EISA plug'n'play...
>
>
I have the following stuff available for free. But you got to come
and get it. I'm in the SF Bay Area (Mnt View). The systems are
known to work unless listed otherwise:
DecWriter II
BA23's
BA400
Intergraph BA23's Nice BA23 style Qbus cases with cool lights and key
PRO350 -w- P/OS Boots. Was VAX Console. Have Docs.
~30 5.25 SCSI Drives Take one or take them all.
7470A Plotter
Small Dec Corp Cab Has 11/23 logo. Holds 3 BA23's or one BA213
Protracer BBJ -w- Postscript Cart
Makes large printouts. Have manuals and extra supplies
DecStation 5000/200 Pizza Box. Should have docs someplace also.
VaxStation 3100's 2 non-working Pizza boxes. May be able to get one working from both.
HP Apollo 700 Pizza Box and Monitor
Sparc 1 Pizza Box and Monitor
RX50 Compat Drives Got a box of these. They are non-dec but are compatable. They are 1/2 height, black, new in bags. One or two to a customer.
Apple II+ More powerful than a Apple I.
Kirk Davis
(kdavis(a)ndx.net)
Whoa! 50 bucks, and three years ago?!? Put it in the price guide!
That means my copy of Ahl's MORE Basic Computer Games has got to be
worth at least $100...
I'm outta here & off to check into eBay, but before I go, 'cause I like
you guys I'll offer it here first at $49.95; 84 (Count 'em!) FABULOUS
games for your personal computer! Start haggling <g>
Speaking of you guys, just curious: is this an all-male hobby? No
members of the fairer sex here?
And Ethan, ain't heard back from you; you want these AIM manuals or what?
mike
--------------Original Message-------------
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:26:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: value of classic DEC machines?
I heard that three years ago when I tried to haggle for a copy of David
Ahl's BASIC Games book at the Dayton Hamvention. They guy said "I can get
$50 for it..." I asked him if he could, what he was doing at Dayton and
why didn't he just sell it on eBay in the first place.
Needless to say, the negotiations did not proceed smoothly. ;-)
- -ethan
I've received a couple SGI Personal Iris' (4D/25 and 4D/35) that I'm trying
to resurrect. After some hunting, I've gotten that elusive keyboard and
mouse for these guys, but no keyboard cables (the 2x PI's take DB9, the 3x's
6 pin mini din). I'm want to make cables, but haven't found a local source
for the necessary parts. Does anybody have any suggestions for an online
source?
Thanks,
Don McClure
Bel Air, MD
I am putting up the following bounties for these software and manuals:
Adobe After Effects 3.x ($30)
Macromedia Sound Edit 16 1.0 ($30)
Macromedia Final Cut ($30)
Macromedia Freehand 5.0 ($30)
GO PenPoint manual (copyright 1992) ($15)
Also:
MacWeek August 7, 1995 ($5)
I need original copies of each, disks and manuals. If you've got them, or
can find them, the bounty amount is yours (upon receipt and verification,
shipping to be paid by me).
Please reply directly to me: <sellam(a)vintage.org>.
Thanks!
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
Not to mention relays-> tubes (valves for tony)-> transistors -> RTL->...
Oops, I see someone else remembers the 914; thanks, Peter.
------------Original Message---------------
DTL -> TTL -> LSI -> FPGA, the gates are the same, just the wires got
smaller and the way one manipulates them changed.
> > Where I used to work, there was an IBM PS/2 model 80 that was installed
> > in a closet to do coordination of manufacturing equipment status and
> > utilization reports when it was new. It ran DOS. It was deinstalled in
> > May 2001. It had been running continuously without a crash, except for
> > losses of power, and that only happened twice in the same year, in 1992.
>
> i wouldn't doubt it, i used to run DOS on my 386 many moons ago, and it
never
> gave me any trouble. it's great. it's almost entirely useless for doing
more
> than one thing at a time. when you get to be that simple, stability is just
> about given to you. but once you step up to large multiuser systems you
have
> all sorts of contention for the same resources that you don't have in a
single
> tasking environment. so yeah, i believe you are right. i'm not, however
very
> impressed. :)
>
> why don't you start throwing mainframe data at us? mainframes run a lot
like
> the old vaxen, uptimes in the double digit years range.
Heh... depends on the mainframe.
The CDC-6600, the world's first supercomputer, was for many years
rated as having a mine-hour MTBF... turned out that was because a
counter was oveflowing after 9 hours of ticking away, and only
under one particular operating system (SCOPE). But even under the
more-stable KRONOS operating system, the field engineers typically
took it down for an hour each morning. Periodically, they would
polish the platters on one of the disk drive units (in the early
90s, we used to kid about using Lemon Pledge to cure stiction, but
they drives *really* did get polished), while smoking a cigarette.
Ok, I'm drifting away from reliability, so I'd better cut & run.
-dq
> I talked to Ken this afternoon.
> He needs 3-4K to cover the back rent on the storage
> and is looking for someone to take all this stuff and
> sell it on eBay for him. He thinks it's worth $100000
Well, hey, if a CoCo is worth $2500 . . .
Glen
0/0
Certainly didn't mean to disparage any S100 junkies out there.
I know my IMSAI's keep getting heavier and heavier. Or perhaps
I'm just getting older. Too bad they didn't make them with
wheels :-)
FYI, I'm also a Mac junkie. Still have my bootable 128K
original with external floppy drive and a rare MicronEye
camera that plugged into it. Have all sorts of old Mac
stuff including spare external drives. My current Mac
is a 500Mhz G4 with the big flat Cinema display. Heaven.
Craig Landrum
Still holding my breath near DC...
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 10:42:11 -0500
> From: M H Stein <mhstein(a)usa.net>
> Subject: Big Iron - was Genrad Futuredata info
>
> Having just dropped a rackmount Cromemco System 3 in the process of moving it, I can assure you that it's (relatively) big and there's lots of iron in that PS transformer... and IIRC, it can support around 32 terminals or so running UNIX with the right cards.
>
> - --------------Original Message--------------
> Craig Landrum skrev:
>
> >Also, having just joined this list, it would appear to be
> >dominated by primarily big iron types instead of us IMSAI
> >and S100 junkies. Assuming there are a few out there and
> >you wish to correspond, here's what I have:
>
> While I agree that there are a lot of rack-mount random TTL junkies here, to
> some of us, S-100 and things like that are "big iron" as well. =)
>
y
Brian Hechinger <wonko(a)arkham.ws> wrote:
> us UNIX weenie wave our uptime numbers around at each other, VMS people don't
> do that. why? you install VMS, boot the machine, and expect it to run until
> you take it offline. the pair of 6000 boxes at the one place i worked at ran
> from the day they were installed, up until they were removed from the facility
> late last year. never shut down. not once. god i love that stuff.
Guess you weren't running UCX then.
Back then, it was hard to find a packet that _didn't_ cause a fatal
bug check on a machine running UCX. Ok, maybe I'm exaggerating just
a little bit, but it sure was annoying and all we got from DEC was
"so don't do that".
Long shot I know but my girlfriend is getting rid of an old Stylewriter
ink jet printer for the Mac (not sure of model number etc but she used
it on a very old Mac mono laptop) - just thought I'd see if anyone here
wanted it before it goes to ebay. Its in the UK by the way.
Offers / enquiries privately off-list.
Cheers.
Shaun
> Anybody know what a DEC H9642 enclosure looks like or how big? The
> NetBSD hardware reference says its two BA23s... but I need to know if
> I can fit it into the back of a Kia Sportage. Pictures, anyone?
I don't have the manual to hand right
now but my recollection is that it is
roughly chest high, about as wide and
deep as a UK fridge and would be a
pain to load into anything other than
an estate car (station wagon to you IIRC).
In fact, even in an estate you may find that
the box is slightly too high to fit.
I picked up a BA123 in my car a few years
ago and, although it did fit, lifting it in
(with help) and out (without help) was
harder than I thought it would be.
Antonio
Now that you jog the old grey cells, of course you're right; in fact, the
manual states "You should make sure that you buy diskettes for SOFT
SECTORED FORMAT (in caps!)...
What confused my recollection was that I remembered making a few bucks
selling hard-sectored diskettes to PET dealers when the FDDs first came
out, but now that I think back it was probably
because they were cheap & we'd discovered that they'd work, not because
they were required.
I did think that the high-density drives used at least one index hole, but
no, just looked inside the
8050 and no sensors; wrong again (and how many times have I ranted to
myself that people who
don't know what they're talking about should keep their mouth shut).
In the words of the immortal Emily Latella (?) on SNL: never mind...
m
---------------Original message-----------------
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 18:37:45 -0800 (PST)
From: "Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
Subject: Re: hard-sector 5 1/4 disk
> Commodore, for one, on their older low density drives.
Commodore, like Apple, was COMPLETELY soft-sector - it ignored the index
pulse COMPLETELY, and therefore would work with hard-sector, soft-sector,
upside down (with write enable notch), ...
I'm still looking for a DECNA for a Pro350/Pro380. I thought I'd
ask again to see if anyone has an extra.
--
Eric Dittman
dittman(a)dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
The fake for that using discretes is one transistor per emitter used
with the bases and collectors as common. The other is diodes.
The real problem is level shifting and the use of excess redundant
transistors.
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Ewing <greg(a)cosc.canterbury.ac.nz>
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: CPU design at the gate level
>"Peter C. Wallace" <pcw(a)mesanet.com>:
>
>> There was non-integrated RTL and DTL logic before ICs not sure about
non
>> integrated TTL...
>
>I don't think non-integrated TTL is even possible using
>standard parts. It relies on multiple-emitter transistors,
>and I've never heard of anyone making those available
>discretely.
>
>Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept,
+--------------------------------------+
>University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a |
>Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. |
>greg(a)cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
On Oct 30, 10:32, Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) wrote:
> 3.5" 1.4M (I have NEVER seen a 1.44M format!) are also at 300RPM
However, many original 3.5" (SSDD not HD) ran at 600rpm, but with 2x the
normal data rate (so the disks could also be used in 300rpm drives at
normal data rates).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Chad Fernandez
As promised, I waited until Wednesday. Chad was among the first to email me,
and he happens to live right on my way home to good ol' Nashville (or
Vermontville, take your pick) - thank all things holy I grew up in Chicago.
Thanks for playing everyone.
Blair
I am in need of the aforementioned ethernet cards; possible trade
items I have are KFQSA (skunk), KLESI-(Q), M9312's, RXV21,
RA70, RA73 or ....
-nick oliviero
Thanks! I believe I have a couple of ESDI drives hanging
around from one of my SGI 4D/70 behemoths....
I've done another quick deja search and, while it's confirmed
the ESDIness of the controller, There doesn't seem to be
any info out there as far as the DIP switch, and pinouts
for the connectors. (I also checked a few other sites I
know of that have scanned DEC manuals, but no luck... anyone
know of a site with a scanned manual for this critter?)
If I remember correctly, ESDI has a MFM-like interconnect
with separate control and data cables. The control cable
daisy-chains across the drives, while the data cables
star out from the controller to each drive. Since my
controller has 3 connectors, I would guess that it probably
supports 2 drives (one connector driving the control cable,
and one data connector for each of two drives) What I don't
know is the pinouts for the connectors on the controller
(since all 3 connectors appear to be identical in size
and SCSI-2 form factor) does anyone have a clue as to the connector
assignments and wiring pattern? I can possibly hack a couple
of SCSI2 cables to make a viable adaptor...
-thanks-
-al-
-acorda(a)1bigred.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck McManis [mailto:cmcmanis@mcmanis.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:00 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Emulex Qbus Disk controller? (Need help identifying this
> one)
>
>
> Search on Emulex QD24 and you'll be rewarded with the
> information that it
> is an Emulex MSCP ESDI disk controller. Which can be just as
> useful as a
> SCSI card since finding a couple of 300MB ESDI drives
> shouldn't be too
> hard. I think I've got a 170MB one laying about somewhere.
> Kirk Davis (kdb(a)ndx.net) mentioned he had some SCSI
> controllers he was
> thinking about trading for PDP-11 gear. Also I just missed a
> lot that had
> about 10 Dilog SCSI controllers on it at a local scrap/bid
> place (had I
> known I would have bid more than the $75 it went for :-() my
> interest was
> in the more mundane things like a couple of DSSI ID plugs and
> an external
> DSSI disk expansion box.
>
> --Chuck
>
> At 11:32 AM 10/31/01, you wrote:
>
> >I'm trying to bring up NetBSD on a Vax 4000/300, and so I'm
> >looking for a MSCP SCSI disk controller. After going through
> >my stack of Qbus boards (collected from hamfests, etc.) I came across
> >one that looks like it might be a SCSI controller... unfortunately,
> >I haven't been able to confirm it, since a google search turns up
> >very little on it (a bad sign...sigh) The board is labeled:
> >
> >"Emulex Corp QD2410401-02 rev F"
> >
> >It has 3 connectors and a DIP switch on the front plate. The
> >connectors appear to be of the SCSI-2 form factor. Has anyone
> >run across this critter before, or tried it with NetBSD? Come
> >to think of it, Is this even SCSI, or something else
> >entirely? Also, does anyone know where their might be some
> >on-line docs for it, or at least a description of the DIP
> switch settings...
> >
> >-thanks-
> >-al-
> >-acorda(a)1bigred.com
>
Sue Beck of Concord, Massachusetts, has a TRS-80 Model 4P that needs to
find a new home. Please contact her directly.
Reply-to: <sbeck(a)world.std.com>
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
Hi,
O.K. the good news is that I managed to boot VMS, read all 40
files from the Ultrix 4.1 boot tape without error (and with
the right block size :-) and write those files back to a
TK70 tape without major problems. I know that the tape is
good and the drive is good. (At least good enough.) And still
we won't boot. But that means that something is wrong with
that Ultrix version 4.1. It doesn't work on the VAX 6400.
Fortunately I am in the position of access to sources that
would allow me to build an Ultrix 4.2 based loader. However,
I'm even convinced that it isn't the loader's fault. The
4.2 sources of the loader show that it always prints an
error before halting. And I never see an error. In fact
the only way for the loader to exit without a message appears
to be its non-returning call to the vmb.exe gizmo. And
-- oh bummer -- I don't seem to have source code for that
one.
The interesting light pattern at the TBK70 board and the
console fault light seems not to indicate a read error
>from tape, but more likely a futile attempt of some
boot stage of getting to talk to the TBK70 and carrying
on the next boot stage. Too bad I can't find out when
and where this happens.
Anyway, quite likely its in the vmb.exe gizmo which is
a black box. So, I might need some boot tape of a newer
version (one that properly supports the VAX 6400 series)
or I have to find an alternative booting strategy. I
guess the MOP booting of ultrix might becoming a more
feasible option. So, here is a call upon all of you who
know something about MOP booting Ultrix. Please give
me any info you might have. I have mopd and am on
FreeBSD as the boot host. ... ... ...
Another alternative is to set up an "InfoServer"
VAX station with a CD ROM and an Ultrix CD of a
post 4.1 version. Is this something someone has available?
May be in the area or something one could set up
accessible through the Internet (a 36 kbps modem line,
ahem...) Once I have Ultrix up on one machine I can
help others to do the same. If not by writing a boot
tape by ...
... here is another option how a good soul could help
me get going: If you have an Ultrix 4.2 or higher
running on an RA disk, I would appreciate a disk image.
That I should be able to raw write to another RA90
(or RA82) using VMS and then boot from that disk.
Just make sure there is a GENERIC kernel on the disk
image. I still don't have a KFMSA, so RF disk images
would not help me. Except, perhaps, if someone has
Ultrix 4.2 or higher running and some spare disks
to tinker with, I might be able to fiddle a generic
disk image that could be installed on any disk.
BTW: after having fixed my TU81 unit number problem, I
still can't boot from TU81. Seems like the VAX 6400
with my EEPROM revision doesn't know how to boot from
TU81. If someone (Geoff?) knows he can boot that way,
may be I could use an EEPROM update. Would appreciate
your EEPROM dump then.
Thanks much,
-Gunther
--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
I could definitely use the following:
1. CPU board.
2. IO board.
3. Power Bricks.
4. Memory.
-thanks-
-al-
-acorda(a)1bigred.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence LeMay [mailto:lemay@cs.umn.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:57 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: SGI challenge L
>
>
> Does anyone here have a SGI Challenge L? They're tossing a
> few that dont
> work, so I might be able to get a small part or so if it is
> needed. There
> are some hard drives, i'm told they are differential, but
> they probably
> wont last long once the students start grabbing them (students dont
> know what differential is anyways).
>
> -Lawrence LeMay
> lemay(a)cs.umn.edu
>
Since I haven't seen it mentioned here and in order to continue this
fascinating thread with erudite arguments over their validity, I notice
that UC Davis has suggested values for the items in their collection:
http://wwwcsif.cs.ucdavis.edu/~csclub/museum/contents.html
Search on Emulex QD24 and you'll be rewarded with the information that it
is an Emulex MSCP ESDI disk controller. Which can be just as useful as a
SCSI card since finding a couple of 300MB ESDI drives shouldn't be too
hard. I think I've got a 170MB one laying about somewhere.
Kirk Davis (kdb(a)ndx.net) mentioned he had some SCSI controllers he was
thinking about trading for PDP-11 gear. Also I just missed a lot that had
about 10 Dilog SCSI controllers on it at a local scrap/bid place (had I
known I would have bid more than the $75 it went for :-() my interest was
in the more mundane things like a couple of DSSI ID plugs and an external
DSSI disk expansion box.
--Chuck
At 11:32 AM 10/31/01, you wrote:
>I'm trying to bring up NetBSD on a Vax 4000/300, and so I'm
>looking for a MSCP SCSI disk controller. After going through
>my stack of Qbus boards (collected from hamfests, etc.) I came across
>one that looks like it might be a SCSI controller... unfortunately,
>I haven't been able to confirm it, since a google search turns up
>very little on it (a bad sign...sigh) The board is labeled:
>
>"Emulex Corp QD2410401-02 rev F"
>
>It has 3 connectors and a DIP switch on the front plate. The
>connectors appear to be of the SCSI-2 form factor. Has anyone
>run across this critter before, or tried it with NetBSD? Come
>to think of it, Is this even SCSI, or something else
>entirely? Also, does anyone know where their might be some
>on-line docs for it, or at least a description of the DIP switch settings...
>
>-thanks-
>-al-
>-acorda(a)1bigred.com
I'm actually centered in other adquisitions. If this wouldn't be so
you can have no doubt about I should make a bid for it for some
more money.
Is a really pretty system.
Greetings
Sergio
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf(a)vintage.org>
Para: Classic Computers Mailing List <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Fecha: mi?rcoles, 31 de octubre de 2001 21:21
Asunto: Re: Sharp PC-5000 for sale (early 1983 "laptop") update
>
>This is your last chance to submit an offer, otherwise this thing goes for
>$77.
>
>I'm surprised there's not more interest in this.
>
>Oh well.
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 15:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf(a)vintage.org>
>To: Classic Computers Mailing List <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
>Subject: Re: Sharp PC-5000 for sale (early 1983 "laptop") update
>
>
>Someone's going to get a hell of a deal. Top offer so far is $77.
>
>I'm also throwing in the printer module with this:
>
>http://www.siconic.com/crap/sharp_t_printer.jpg
>
>This fits into the compartment on the top of the computer.
>
>> I have a new-in-box Sharp PC-5000 for sale at $350 or best offer by
6:00PM
>> PST October 31st. That is, $350 takes it now (going by first received
>> e-mail response); otherwise, it goes to the best offer under $350 that I
>> receive by 6PM-10/31. Buyer pays shipping from zip code 94588. I am
>> willing to ship internationally
>>
>> The Sharp PC-5000 is one of the very first clamshell style portables
>> (later known as laptops) circa 1983. According to our own Uncle Roger,
it
>> even beat out the Gavilan.
>>
>> http://sinasohn.com/cgi-bin/clascomp/bldhtm.pl?computer=shp5000
>>
>> This unit comes in the original box, with the original packing foam, is
>> basically new, has the manuals and battery and power supply (everything
>> that originally came with it), as well as a bubble memory carthridge.
>>
>> Photos:
>>
>> The Computer
>> http://www.siconic.com/crap/sharp5000.jpg
>>
>> The Box
>> http://www.siconic.com/crap/sharp_box.jpg
>>
>> The Manual
>> http://www.siconic.com/crap/Sharp_us_g.jpg
>>
>> The Bubble Memory Module
>> http://www.siconic.com/crap/Sharp_Bm_box.jpg
>>
>> Please reply directly to me at <sellam(a)vintage.org>. If you have any
>> questions, ask away!
>
>Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
Festival
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
>
>
Does anyone here have a SGI Challenge L? They're tossing a few that dont
work, so I might be able to get a small part or so if it is needed. There
are some hard drives, i'm told they are differential, but they probably
wont last long once the students start grabbing them (students dont
know what differential is anyways).
-Lawrence LeMay
lemay(a)cs.umn.edu
>From the Field Guide to Qbus and Unibus Modules:
http://world.std.com/~mbg/pdp11-field-guide.txt
It would appear that you have the following:
QD24 Q Emulex ESDI disk controller. Emulates MSCP.
For VAX 3500/3600
I'm not sure which one you really want, but it is probably
in the Field Guide, possibly one of the UC controllers.
--tom
At 02:32 PM 10/31/01 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I'm trying to bring up NetBSD on a Vax 4000/300, and so I'm
>looking for a MSCP SCSI disk controller. After going through
>my stack of Qbus boards (collected from hamfests, etc.) I came across
>one that looks like it might be a SCSI controller... unfortunately,
>I haven't been able to confirm it, since a google search turns up
>very little on it (a bad sign...sigh) The board is labeled:
>
>"Emulex Corp QD2410401-02 rev F"
>
>It has 3 connectors and a DIP switch on the front plate. The
>connectors appear to be of the SCSI-2 form factor. Has anyone
>run across this critter before, or tried it with NetBSD? Come
>to think of it, Is this even SCSI, or something else
>entirely? Also, does anyone know where their might be some
>on-line docs for it, or at least a description of the DIP switch settings...
>
>-thanks-
>-al-
>-acorda(a)1bigred.com
>
>
>
>
----------------Original Message---------------
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 22:52:35 -0800
From: "Wayne M. Smith" <wmsmith(a)earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Price guide for vintage computers
Odd values. $500 for a DG-1, but only $250 for an IMSAI
8080? Don't think so.
-------------
Didn't think so either, but thought it'd be interesting to show just
how useful(-less?) a price guide might be.
----------------Original Message2---------------
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 23:22:01 -0800
From: "Ernest" <ernestls(a)home.com>
Subject: RE: Price guide for vintage computers
Well there you go. No need for further discussion. The definitive price
guide has already been written.
E.
-------------
LOL
This is your last chance to submit an offer, otherwise this thing goes for
$77.
I'm surprised there's not more interest in this.
Oh well.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 15:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf(a)vintage.org>
To: Classic Computers Mailing List <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Sharp PC-5000 for sale (early 1983 "laptop") update
Someone's going to get a hell of a deal. Top offer so far is $77.
I'm also throwing in the printer module with this:
http://www.siconic.com/crap/sharp_t_printer.jpg
This fits into the compartment on the top of the computer.
> I have a new-in-box Sharp PC-5000 for sale at $350 or best offer by 6:00PM
> PST October 31st. That is, $350 takes it now (going by first received
> e-mail response); otherwise, it goes to the best offer under $350 that I
> receive by 6PM-10/31. Buyer pays shipping from zip code 94588. I am
> willing to ship internationally
>
> The Sharp PC-5000 is one of the very first clamshell style portables
> (later known as laptops) circa 1983. According to our own Uncle Roger, it
> even beat out the Gavilan.
>
> http://sinasohn.com/cgi-bin/clascomp/bldhtm.pl?computer=shp5000
>
> This unit comes in the original box, with the original packing foam, is
> basically new, has the manuals and battery and power supply (everything
> that originally came with it), as well as a bubble memory carthridge.
>
> Photos:
>
> The Computer
> http://www.siconic.com/crap/sharp5000.jpg
>
> The Box
> http://www.siconic.com/crap/sharp_box.jpg
>
> The Manual
> http://www.siconic.com/crap/Sharp_us_g.jpg
>
> The Bubble Memory Module
> http://www.siconic.com/crap/Sharp_Bm_box.jpg
>
> Please reply directly to me at <sellam(a)vintage.org>. If you have any
> questions, ask away!
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
I'm trying to bring up NetBSD on a Vax 4000/300, and so I'm
looking for a MSCP SCSI disk controller. After going through
my stack of Qbus boards (collected from hamfests, etc.) I came across
one that looks like it might be a SCSI controller... unfortunately,
I haven't been able to confirm it, since a google search turns up
very little on it (a bad sign...sigh) The board is labeled:
"Emulex Corp QD2410401-02 rev F"
It has 3 connectors and a DIP switch on the front plate. The
connectors appear to be of the SCSI-2 form factor. Has anyone
run across this critter before, or tried it with NetBSD? Come
to think of it, Is this even SCSI, or something else
entirely? Also, does anyone know where their might be some
on-line docs for it, or at least a description of the DIP switch settings...
-thanks-
-al-
-acorda(a)1bigred.com
Hi,
Seen on another newsgroup, I thought this might
be of interest to HP 2000 collectors ... particularly
the note about "dozens of paper tapes" :)
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:11:28 -0500
Subject: Re: [HP3000-L] OT: HP2000?
From: John Korb <johnkorb(a)LASER.NET>
To: HP3000-L(a)RAVEN.UTC.EDU
Send reply to: John Korb <johnkorb(a)LASER.NET>
The HP 2000 is a very old machine, the last of which rolled off the
assembly line in 1978. George Mason University (the State University in
Northern Virginia) had (it is long gone) the next-to-last HP 2000
produced. It ran a version of the operating system with date code
1812. The operating system on this system was "HP 2000 ACCESS BASIC". The
system GMU had (which was fairly typical of the HP 2000's of the day)
consisted of the following hardware:
-- one 21MX-E processor with 64K bytes RAM, used as the "System Processor"
-- one 21MX-E processor with 64K bytes RAM, used as the "I/O Processor"
-- one 7970E nine track 1600 CPI tape drive
-- one 7920 disc drive with 50 MB capacity, of which the Access operating
system could only address the first approximately 33 MB
-- one 2617 line printer
-- one 2392A card reader
-- one 2640b terminal as the system console
The operating system supported 32 users. As the "HP 2000 ACCESS BASIC"
name implies, the system supported a single language, BASIC, but it was a
good one, and the old BASIC/V on the HP 3000 appears to be an expansion of
the HP 2000 ACCESS BASIC. There were interfaces RJE, and many HP 2000's
supported users who created/edited batch jobs on the HP 2000 which were
then submitted through the RJE interface to an IBM, CDC, Univac, or other
mainframe (as GMU did).
There was no print spooler or spooler for the card reader, so people wrote
their own, in BASIC, some supporting GE Terminets or DECwriters as remote
spooled printers.
The accounting structure was based upon account names consisting of four
characters - a letter followed by a three digit number. The "A000" account
was the equivalent of the HP 3000's "PUB.SYS". It was the system library
account, and had special privileges. It was here that you placed the
"HELLO" program that every user ran when they logged in, whether they knew
it or not.
Group library accounts on the HP 2000 were those accounts where the three
digits in the account name were "000". For example, all users in the
accounts D301 through D399 would be allowed special access to
programs/files in the D300 account.
The Z999 account was used by HP for special purposes. It has been so long
now that I don't remember what the unique capabilities of Z999 were.
The HP 2000 also had the capability of running other operating systems in
stand-alone, single-user mode. One of these was Fortran, but I never used
it so I can't comment on it.
In my basement I still have dozens of paper tapes of HP 2000 BASIC
programs. In 1999 and 2000 I converted some of those to run on the Classic
(16 bit) HP 3000 in BASIC/V. The most difficult part of converting HP 2000
BASIC programs to run on the HP 3000 is that the disc files on the HP 2000
were based on 512 byte "blocks", which means that any HP 2000 application
"smart" enough to know the algorithm used to calculate how many free bytes
there are remaining in a block (there are overhead bytes for each string,
etc.) has to be painfully rewritten to run on the HP 3000.
That's about all I have time for. I hope that gives you some feel for the
HP 2000. There were many of us who loved that little system. As to
whether there are any still running, I don't know, but I doubt it.
John
At 2001-10-31 10:21, David T Darnell wrote:
>Dear List,
>
>I've seen references to the HP2000 a few times on this list.
[...]
>What's an HP2000? Where can I get more info on it. How about online docs?
------- End of forwarded message -------
Stan Sieler sieler(a)allegro.com
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.htmlwww.allegro.com/sieler
It's just been pointed out to me (thank you for your diplomacy, whoever
you are) that my posts are a little hard to read for some people since
I haven't been inserting CRs. Mea culpa, sorry, my forehead's getting
quite a flat spot these days from all the slapping. I should have
thought about and noticed that myself, especially on this list; I can
just imagine all those ASR33s pounding away in the last column...
(But at least I haven't been sending HTML <G>)
mike
I have acquired some HP-UX 9000 series 700/800
items that I have no clue about and no use for.
1. Two identical manuals: "Installing HP-UX 10.10 and
Updating from HP-UX 10.0x to 10.10."
2. Manual: "Support Media User's Manual
PA-RISC Computer Systems."
3. CD-ROMs: "HP Instant Information CD
HP-UX Release 10."
June 1998 and April 1998.
4. CD-ROM: "HP-UX Diagnostic/Independent Product
Release Media."
June 1998
5. CD-ROMs: "10.20 Hardware Extensions 2.0
HP-UX 10.20 Servers" April 1998
"HP-UX Extensions Software" April 1998
6. CD-ROM: "HP-UX Recovery Release 10.20"
7. Four CD-ROMs: HP-UX Applications Release 10.20"
Disks 1 through 4. June 1998.
Can anyone use these?
Paul R. Santa-Maria
Monroe, Michigan USA
I have what looks like an accelerator board for an Apple II. Looks
like a Saturn Systems Inc. Accelerator II. Has a 65c02c and 64 K
of ram on board. Anyone have any info on this? Doc? What the
jumper settings are (there is an 8 switch jumper block on it) or any
software needed to use it?
This system also has a Micromodem II in it but no doc or the
interface from the board to the phone plug. Anyone have a spare
plug or the pin outs to make one?
Thanks.
-----
"What is, is what?"
"When the mind is free of any thought or judgement,
then and only then can we know things as they are."
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
> On 30-Oct-2001 Eric Chomko wrote:
> > ROFLMAOGSFTH - rolling on floor laughing my ass off getting spliters
> > from the hardwood
>
> 2 letters : K-Y
Hey, watch it! This is a family list....
Unless that was a remark about a certain state, in which
case I'd say, "Hey watch it! This is a family list..."
;-)
> As soon as one has no choice but to send stuff to scrap
> merchants, they then tend to start charging for taking it
> away instead of paying for it.
That might not happen with circuit boards though. What's
being recovered is Gold, Palladium, Tantalum, maybe some silver,
among other materials. And the competition amongst recyclers
to be the one to be able to service this ought to keep them
willing to pay for the raw materials. But break your equipment
down, so you're just turning in the circuit boards. And if you
separate the low yield PC grade ones from the high yield
commercial grade ones, you still might do all right with them.
>
> Here in the UK that might change soon. It is about to become illegal to send
> electronic waste to landfill so it _must_ be recycled. As soon as one has no
> choice but to send stuff to scrap merchants, they then tend to start charging
> for taking it away instead of paying for it.
>
> I have already seen the same happen with lead-acid batteries and old fridges,
> to name but two examples, when the legislation came in stopping them being
> disposed of by other means than sending them for scrap.
>
> --
> Regards
> Pete
While visiting the San Francisco area for the Computer Museum History
Center's awards dinner, I swung by Stanford to see their exhibit of old
(largely Stanford custom) computer hardware. Various groups at Stanford
had computer systems (mostly PDP-6 and -10 I believe), but the exhibit
highlights the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab, a.k.a. SAIL.
SAIL had a multiprocessor system containing a KA10, a KL10, and a PDP-6,
as well as two smaller computers dedicated to video control, two megawords
of memory (eight times the address space of the -10), and disk storage,
so they obviously had enough blinkenlights for anyone.
But one of the programmers added a box (looking more or less like a tiny
traffic light) to his office. Green meant "normal operation". Yellow meant
"parity error". (Failures tended to happen in clumps, so after finding one
error, the software would kill the affected job and then search for all other
errors and kill all other affected jobs.) Red meant "The OS has halted an
Exec-mode DDT is running". (Think "kernel debugger".) No lights meant
"Things are really messed up".
Not exactly high bandwidth, but still an elegant metaphor!
-- Derek
I was told at one time that work had begun on MIPS/VMS just before DEC's
abandonment of the DECstation line in favor of Alpha. Does anyone (maybe
a current Compaq employee) know where in some dark corner the sources
might be found?
Peace... Sridhar
-------------Original Message--------------------
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:41:54 -0500
From: Jim Donoghue <jdonogh1(a)prodigy.net>
Subject: hard-sector 5 1/4 disk
Anybody ever see anything that uses hard sector 5 1/4 disks? I've only ever
seen one in my lifetime - just curious if they were ever used anywhere else
(the one I saw was used to load microcode into a mainframe CPU)
*---
Commodore, for one, on their older low density drives.
m
-------------Original Message #2--------------------
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 22:27:59 -0500
From: "Chandra Bajpai" <cbajpai(a)mediaone.net>
Subject: RE: hard-sector 5 1/4 disk
I've got a Northstar Advantage that uses them...anyone know where to get
hard sector disks these days?
- -Chandra
*---
Might still have some; I'll look
m