Hallo to all members in SoCal. I plan to drop out of the
Californian sky this weekend (just stoped by at the travel
agency and found out that a flight Munich to LA is way
cheaper than Munich New York - in fact even chaeper than
a trip to Paderborn and back :). If the crater at LAX isn't
too big (and our on board terrrorist doesn't have other
plans) I would like to know if there is anything special
in the LA area for the WE.
Gruss
H.
BTW: Newsfactor has a nice cartoon about yahoo auctions today
http://www.ecommercetimes.com/images/cartoon/king010302.jpg
--
VCF Europa 3.0 am 27./28. April 2002 in Muenchen
http://www.vcfe.org/
> ----------
> From: Eric Dittman
>
> > Well, I think I may have found that guy. I need to find out if a
> > Digital BA 350-SA Storage Shelf is what I'm looking for...
>
> The BA350 storage shelves are narrow-only. You can't use the
> wide SBBs in them. A BA356 would probably be a better choice.
> A lot of the newer wide SBBs use SCA drives.
>
> The BA35x use a proprietary backplane, not an SCA backplane.
> Fortunately, you can find the SBBs cheap.
> --
>
Yeah, probably the same backplane that's in the older AlphaServers here...
So, to see if I understand you correctly...
- The SBB is the tray for the HDD...
- The SBBs for use in the 350, have a 50 pin connector, none have the SCA...
-- If so, I wonder if there is room inside the tray to fit a SCA 80-50pin
adapter?
-If I want to use narrow SCA-80 drives in a Digital Storage Shelf, I should
look for the 356 and SBBs for that?
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 90581
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julius Sridhar [mailto:vance@ikickass.org]
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Tothwolf wrote:
> > SCSI itself is confusing...basically the bus will operate at the fastest
> > rate of the slowest device on the bus.
> This is simply not the case.
This took me a while to get... it would have been better if
you'd said "this is not always the case."
If I understand properly, you are saying that, for instance,
you can plug a fast/wide disk into an ultra bus, and the bus
(of course), wouldn't run the fast/wide disk at its highest
potential bandwidth. Conversely, a narrow disk in a wide
bus would not slow the bus down.
On the other hand, I understood Toth to be talking about bus
clock only. In that case, his previous statement is as true
as yours, which, oddly enough, was made in argument to it. ;)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
Begin forwarded message:
<original poster's info snipped>
Yet another Microsoft Outlook exploit is on the loose... and this time the
arrogance of the recommended solution is breathtaking. The problem is the
built-in support for UUENCODED text within the body of a message. Prudent
programmers will use a starting pattern such as
"\n\nbegin ([[:octal:]]+) ([^\n]+)\n"
and subsequently verify that each line has the expected format. Even
checking only the first few lines (e.g., verifying that the first
character correctly encodes the length of the rest of the line)
essentially eliminates any chance of a false hit.
Sadly, it will surprise few people that Microsoft cuts straight to the
heart of the matter. If your line starts with "begin " (possibly with two
spaces), Outlook/Outlook Express WILL interpret the rest of the message as
a UUENCODED attachment. It doesn't need a preceding blank line, nor a
following octal number. It doesn't need subsequent lines that actually
look like UUENCODED data.
There are some reports on slashdot that later versions of O/OE have
discarded the "view source" command, with the effect that the rest of the
message is permanently lost to the user. The use of this bug as a DOS
attack on mailing lists that use a 'digest' approach is left as an
exercise for the reader.
Naturally, it hasn't taken long for the malware writers to jump on the
bandwagon. All you need to do to get around the "strip executable
attachment" killjoys is to put the malware right in the body of the
message! Just start a line with "begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com" and
you're off and running!
Microsoft's official position, at
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q265230 , is
stunning in it's <s>feeble-mindedness</s> simplicity. We, and by "we"
I mean every person on the planet who may ever send a message to an
O/OE <s>victim</s> user, or have a message forwarded to such users,
are advised (with editorial comments) to:
* not start messages with the word "begin"
(actually, it's *any* line starting with the word "begin". And
that's effectively a ban on the word "begin" for anyone using a
mail agent with transparent line wrapping, e.g., the web mail
portals that some ISPs are pushing.)
* capitalize the word "begin," even when used within a sentence. E.g.,
"We will Begin the new project when Bob returns from his vacation.
* Use a different word such as "start" or "commence." E.g., all
training materials for new Visual Basic programmers shall henceforce
refer to "start/end" loops instead of "begin/end" loops.
Microsoft's justification for suggesting a significant change to the
English language instead of fixing their bug is given as:
"In a SMTP e-mail message, a file attachment that is encoded in
UUencode format is defined when the word "begin" is followed by
two spaces and then some data,..."
Needless to say there is no citation given for this "fact." That's
probably related to the fact that UUENCODE was defined by UUCP, not SMTP,
and that every encoder/decoder I have seen requires a leading blank line
and a octal file permissions code.
But the damage is done - since malware is exploiting this bug we now get
to put into place filters that don't just strip executable attachments or
properly formatted UUENCODED blocks, we also have to strip *improperly*
formatted UUENCODED blocks!
Bear Giles
For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
--
Until later: Geoffrey esoteric(a)3times25.net
"...the system (Microsoft passport) carries significant risks to users
that are not made adequately clear in the technical documentation
available."- David P. Kormann and Aviel D. Rubin, AT&T Labs - Research
- http://www.avirubin.com/passport.html
_______________________________________________
Am-info mailing list
Am-info(a)lists.essential.org
http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/am-info
--
#####################################################
| Put an end to the collusion of unconscionable |
| corporate greed and bootlicking politicians which |
| spawns bad law like the DCMA and UCITA. |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| Take back your rights to make backup copies of |
| software, to own/sell the software you buy, and |
| to use the software as you see fit. |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| "No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be |
| satisfied until justice rolls down like water and |
| righteousness like a mighty stream." MLK 1963 |
#####################################################
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: alg-unsubscribe(a)austinlug.org
For additional commands, e-mail: alg-help(a)austinlug.org
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Doc wrote:
>
> > Yet another Microsoft Outlook exploit is on the loose... and this time the
> > arrogance of the recommended solution is breathtaking. The problem is the
> > built-in support for UUENCODED text within the body of a message. Prudent
> > programmers will use a starting pattern such as
>
> If people are still using MS Outlook inspite of all the viruses and crap
> that have plagued that pathetic piece of shit in the past few years then
> they not only deserve whatever damage gets done to their system via such
> vehicles but they shouldn't be allowed to use e-mail at all since they
> only end up contributing to the greater problem by running it!
Until the govt performs a door-to-door search for all the script
kiddies, whatever is the most-popular-and-prevalent-platform will be
the target for such attacks. You may think that Pine has no way of
being exploited (is Mark Crispin on this list?), but wait'll it's
the only thing we're using...
Seriously, Outlook isn't the source of the stated problems; half-assed,
self-taught, sycophantic sysadmins who can't secure their systems are!
Dick ---
Well, I think I may have found that guy. I need to find out if a
Digital BA 350-SA Storage Shelf is what I'm looking for...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 90581
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> ----------
> From: Richard Erlacher
>
> There's a fellow who routinely sells SCA backplanes to be used in such
> applications for somewher between 6 and 15 dollars on eBay. I'd look for
> those as a starting point. ISTR that he had some for pairs of three
> drives
> and some for groups of 6. 't seems to me like that will be easier to deal
> with than a search for a complete case, which will undoubtedly require a
> redundant 500W PSU as well.
>
> Dick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Woyciesjes"
>
> > I figure I'll try here first...
> > I'm looking for a case for some SCA-80 SCSI drives I picked up. They
> > have plastic Sun drive rails, from their RAID tower, P/N 5402568-03...
> > Those rails are useless to me, and therefore up for sale/trade;
> > unless of course I can find a Sun box to use them in.
> >
> > --- David A Woyciesjes
>
Not the same thing, but similar enough to be relevant: AT&T made box (I
think with an 80486) called a StarServer. It was a Unix box and had a card
that could take two cables that went to "concentrators," which were 12 port
(IIRC) addressible serial
hubs, each with their own wall wart. The output went to a dumb terminal or
serial-interface printer. Concentrators could be daisy-chained, so at least
4 could be hooked to one card in the StarServer. I baby-sat one of these in
a law office half a dozen years ago. The concentrators were a real PITA, as
they were static sensitive -- I blew one out once with a spark while
connecting the RJ45 to a terminal once. Other times I must have looked at
the concentrator the wrong way or some such. Got to know the local AT&T/NCR
service tech pretty well :).
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Tothwolf [mailto:tothwolf@concentric.net]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 11:07 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: StarLink Multi-User System
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Norman Alcott wrote:
> " Introducing StarLink the computer expansion system. The system lets
> you link four "dumb" terminals or microcomputers to a single IBM
> Personal Computer, and function as if it's the only terminal connected
> to the computer."
I believe I have something similar to this stored away. It has a full size
card (can't remember if it is 8 or 16 bit, think it is 16), and a brown
molded plastic "block" with 8 25 pin D-Sub connectors on it. The block
connects to the card via a 37 pin D-Sub.
Does anyone have any information on it or have the software required to
use it?
-Toth
One of the things that I picked up this weekend was an evaluation board
for the Harris H17188 IC. I've checked Harris' site and chip directory but
I can't find anything on the H17188P. Does anyone know what this IC is?
It's in a standard .6" wide 40 pin DIP package and was made in 1995.
Joe
I have docs and software for a similar device made by Digiboard. I think
I have drivers for MS DOS, Novell and Xenix.
Joe
At 11:07 PM 2/11/02 -0600, you wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Norman Alcott wrote:
>
>> " Introducing StarLink the computer expansion system. The system lets
>> you link four "dumb" terminals or microcomputers to a single IBM
>> Personal Computer, and function as if it's the only terminal connected
>> to the computer."
>
>I believe I have something similar to this stored away. It has a full size
>card (can't remember if it is 8 or 16 bit, think it is 16), and a brown
>molded plastic "block" with 8 25 pin D-Sub connectors on it. The block
>connects to the card via a 37 pin D-Sub.
>
>Does anyone have any information on it or have the software required to
>use it?
>
>-Toth
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Claude Ceccon wrote:
>
> > Glancing at their site, they have a number of Opto-22 boards. The
> > Opto-22 series have a number of inputs and outputs all optically
> > isolated. I've got a number of the modules if you are interested...
>
> I know just about everything there is to know about Opto22 I/O systems, if
> you need any help or programming docs or anything...
I used to use Quatech I/O boards containing various Opto22 modules
(and Quatech interface boards) to build materials handling systems
(White carosels, Buschman sorters, scales, etc).
But being a programmer and not an EE, I never understood why we
needed extra load in the A/C output modules to get a light to
turn on. With just a 110v lightbulb, we'd get nothing. But when
we plugged in a soldering iron into the same circuit, it would
turn on and off as we expected.
I can no longer recall how we solved this problem... ideas?
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:foo@siconic.com]
> While I sympathize with you here, a couple points: 1) you
> probably got a
> real good deal on it, which is why you aren't bitching too
> loudly ;) 2)
> you did ask them to make sure it powered up and it did. They
Exactly, and 3) I got it because even in the event that it was
broken, I have another shot LD player which may benefit from a
source of spare parts. :)
> you ask them to stick a laserdics in it and play it on a TV, they will
> probably tell you "we don't have a laserdisc to test it with,
Actually, the conversation went something like that...
> Please note that I am not taking your comments as a
> disgruntled buyer, but
> am simply stating how they operate.
Well, I don't consider myself disgruntled, so that's good. I do hope
that next time I deal with them it will be more smooth.
> > There was a shipping mix-up on that item, and they sent my LD
> > player to somebody else, and send me this guy's mac clone. (I
> > think I'd rather have the Mac clone at this point, though the
> > LD player may be repairable...)
> That's not excusable, but it can be attributed to the
> shortage of people
> resources. They are run so ragged that these kinds of mistakes can
> happen unfortunately. We're working to smooth out the whole process
> though.
I attributed this to the fact that it was ordered just at the beginning
of December, and even ACCRC may have an unusually high volume of orders
at that time.
> There is one person handling the high-end workstation sales.
That's the impression I got...
> One day a
> laid-off geologist walked in and said "I want to learn some
> nifty computer
> skills" so they pointed to a pile of workstations and said
> "go to work"
> (this story is made up but I think it's at least half accurate :)
Well, it's at least half convincing, anyway.
> The guy taught himself everything about SGI, HP, DEC, etc.
> workstations
> and went about putting together and testing complete systems
> for sale on
> Aftermath. He does a pretty good job at it.
He was able to find the faulty part. Honestly, I wish I'd been
able to do that, myself, but I don't have the stack of SGI pieces
to do it :)
> That being said, I think he did his darndest to put together
> a completely
> functional system for you, and I'm sure it was when he boxed
> it up. But
> something probably happened to it in transit.
It seems so -- had you seen the condition it was in when I got it
the first time, you would be even more convinced. I think, but
can't prove, that at least part of the problem may have been UPS.
> Again, lack of resources (specifically people). These guys
> will always
> uphold their end of the deal and will NEVER screw you. You will NEVER
> feel like you got ripped off from them. This is because the
> organization
> is run by one of the most ethical, honest and
> straight-forward people I
> have ever met, James Burgett.
As far as I have dealt with them so far, that seems correct. I
should make it clear that I didn't mean to scare anyone away with
my previous message, but I wanted to give a relatively complete
picture of my dealings with them. My case is probably exceptional,
and I've heard from others who don't have nearly this much trouble.
> Again, they will only test it as far as you ask, or as far as
> they have
> the time and skills to do so. They will never misrepresent
> anything they
> have for sale.
No problem there, of course. They seem to describe their items in
complete and accurate terms.
> They are incredibly decent folk, and all of them have an expertise in
> something, and sometimes it intersects with the expertise you need to
> determine if they have what you want :)
... which is, of course, better luck than you'd have at any local
store, in my experience. ;) Or maybe I'm cursed, and just shouldn't
be allowed to make purchases.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
On State Street, as Russ said. Most were south of the Loop, but there was
one in the north of the loop at Dearborn & Lake until a few years ago. Most
of the active ones are just north of the river now. (I used to work in the
Old Court House building on Hubbard & State, and there was/is one across the
street.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:foo@siconic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:06 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: Dumpster in the alley.
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Russ Blakeman wrote:
> Wacker for bus-only traffic and tore down the adult theaters at the SW
> corner of Wacker and State. Harold Washington College wasn;t there then,
no
They had adult theaters on Wacker Street?
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
Festival
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com
*
> -----Original Message-----
> From: g(a)kurico.com [mailto:g@kurico.com]
> Has anyone tryed purchasing anything from these guys? Their
> site has come up on
> the list before.
I have. Just recently, in fact. I purchased two items -- a
laserdisc player and an SGI Indy.
The Laserdisc player was purchased with the understanding that
they'd test it to make sure it powered up. It did, however
it was trashed internally. Not a big problem, since I understood
that it might be when I purchased it.
There was a shipping mix-up on that item, and they sent my LD
player to somebody else, and send me this guy's mac clone. (I
think I'd rather have the Mac clone at this point, though the
LD player may be repairable...)
The SGI was supposed to be tested and working, but shipped to me
with some problems. The drive sled had become loose in shipping,
and somehow managed to knock the RTC out of its socket half-way.
Needless to say, it wouldn't
power up when I got it. After carefully reseating the RTC,
I managed to get it to turn on, but it wouldn't boot properly.
I ended up having to ship it back. It seems that the power
supply was bad. It was eventually replaced and sent back to
me.
The system is now in working order, however, the CD drive
I got with the system seems to be having some trouble.
(seemingly random read errors, for instance) They have
offered to ship me a second CD drive and allow me to keep
this one (which again may be repairable) for the cost of
shipping. (this is really fine with me, since I like that
drive, and I'd like to get it working for use as a spare)
At any rate, I'm expecting the new drive sometime soon.
The problem is that I placed my orders originally in early
December. They're a little slow in responding.
If you can put up with that, and with the fact that what you
order from them may not be well tested -- if my experience is
any indication -- I don't imagine you'll have a problem dealing
with them.
The prices are certainly good. They also seem like decent
people, and sometimes know what they're talking about.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
On Feb 11, 18:23, Tothwolf wrote:
> There are also Differential versions of Fast, Ultra, Wide, and
Ultra-Wide.
> These use a "high voltage" (+-12VDC IIRC) signaling that is *NOT*
> compatible with standard devices.
That's not correct. Normal differential, sometimes called high voltage
differential to distinguish it from LVDS still uses 5V, same as
single-ended. It uses thresholds of 2V and 3V, zero-referenced, with a
resistive divider asthe terminator, 150 ohms from ground to signal-, 150
ohms from +V (termpower supply) to signal+, and 330 ohms between signal-
and signal+.
> You will literally fry any non HVD
> devices if you connect a HVD drive to the same bus. Ultra2 and newer have
> a Low Voltage Differential bus
Similar to normal differential but based on 3.3V instead of 5V, and the
maximum bus length is halved.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Sridhar,
I have a RS-6000 keyboard that you can use. And I'm in Orlando. My
keyboard was good the last time I used it but that was several years ago.
Joe
At 07:12 PM 2/10/02 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Hi people. I am in need of an RS/6000 keyboard. I need it soon, though.
>It doesn't have to be a permanent arrangement (like a sale or something),
>it just needs to be a loaner. I am in St. Petersburg, FL at Dave
>McGuire's place.
>
>Peace... Sridhar
>
>
Dear Sir and Madam,
We sell Chinese Forklift from 4 tons, 5 tons, 6 tons, and 7 tons
lifting capacity.
Chinese Forklifts are good quality with the most competitive
price. If you are interested, please contact us at:
moonship2000(a)etang.com
moonship(a)heinfo.net
All request will be replyed with photos, specifications
and price list.
Best Regards.
Liu Qi.
president of Moonship International Trade Corporation
http://www.moonship.esmartbiz.com
moonship2000(a)etang.com
moonship(a)heinfo.net
liuqi(a)excite.com
Tel&Fax:+86-315-2737253
使用极星邮件群发,无须通过邮件服务器,直达对方邮箱,速度绝对一流!
下载网址:http://love2net.51.net/,更多免费的超酷软件等你来下……
----------------------------------------------------
INFORMATION
This message has been sent using a trial-run version
of the TSmtpRelayServer Delphi Component.
----------------------------------------------------
I have a connundrum. I want to thin out my collection of computer artifacts
and I'm having problems on what to part with. I also could use the money.
Instead, even in the middle of nowhere, far from Toronto where I accumulated
all this stuff, I find it growing. The problem isn't lack of space as it once was,
but simply to have a manageable hobby.
I admit, I'm a packrat, and I transported most of my treasures 2000 mi.
shedding replaceable things like couches, beds and appliances justifying
that in my waning years I could dribble-sell them off to supplement my
pension. (even that huge Dumont tube scope that had been refused as
a gift by a list member, shipping would be ridiculous.)
Plus the idea of a small computer museum (a Toronto one had once been
a justification) in the center of the continent in a totally unexpected
environment had some appeal.
I don't want to go the route of a massive sell-off like several list-members
did, but clearly I have to take control of this addiction. My first fix was
only to have a couple of Ataris to supplement what was already becoming
a fixation. Then home computers, then CP/M, and you all know the downward
spiral. Thenks got, I never got hooked on minis.
I just went thru my collection and each time I contemplated selling
something off I came up with a valid(?) reason not to. My SCO manuals
because they give a good exposition of UNIX and I MIGHT want to
install it on one of my boxes, an old 83 business computing text
cause it had a pic of my prized Micom system, another text from 73
that had pictures of card processing equipment that I once worked on.
Numerous programming how-to's cause I really have to get beyond hardware
hacking, and then things like do I really need 2 Kaypros or the H89 I'm going
to repair some day. And why in-hell do I have "Lex and YACC", Odysys
Development", Computes 1984 "Guide to Adventure Games". Do I really
need most of the PS/2s as well as several PS/1s for my IBM collection ?
You get the picture.
Sure I have things like my Apple IIc LCD display and DRI GEM volume
I could sell off for wanted cash, but I WANT to keep them.
How do YOU limit your collection when you aren't a Sellam, John Keys
and others with warehouse space. Seriously. It must be a problem that
many of you have made a decision on, even when it wasn't your S.O.
giving an ultimatum. Any guidelines ? Be stern.
Lawrence
Reply to:
lgwalker(a)mts.net
StarLink: I have one unopened package of StarLink.
Information from the package:
" Introducing StarLink the computer expansion system. The system lets you link four "dumb" terminals or microcomputers to a single IBM Personal Computer, and function as if it's the only terminal connected to the computer."
Features:
- Four operating ports
- Onboard 8088 Microprocessor and 64K RAM
- Concurrent PC=DOS
- Shared Data Files
- Intersystems Communications
I am looking to sell this product. Any interest?
Norm
Joe,
Sorry I couldn't make the show.
While I don't have any micromint specific documentation, there's a good
chance I have some of the docs for the STD-BUS computer. Get the numbers off
the cards and I'll see what I have.
The STD BUS supports all kinds of processors. I have seen systems with
processors ranging from a 4004 up to a 486. The most common seem to be Z80
based. What processor is in your system?
The systems fall into two general categories. Dedicated controllers with
task specific operating systems and general purpose computers. If it's a
dedicated system, the OS would be burned in ROM and be of limited use
without reprogramming. If it's a general purpose computer, it would most
likely run CPM or DOS. If it's a CPM based system and you didn't get any
disks, finding a version of CPM that'll run can be a real challenge.
I think you should hand the machine off to someone that specializes in STD
BUS hardware <grin>.
Speaking of Daisy Wheel printers... I prefer to use a daisy wheel for
printing plain text stuff. Currently, I have a DIABLO 630 and am having real
difficulty talking to it. Seems like when I try to print anything, I get
buffer overruns, the wrong chatracters printed, and all kind of other
errors. I have tried every possible combination of comm settings, flow
control, etc... to no avail. Does anyone know where I can find the specs for
setup and handshaking for this printer.
See ya,
SteveRob
>From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
>Reply-To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>Subject: THE best find of the weekend!
>Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:20:14 -0500
>
>Besides that nice trinket I also got two Gould logic analyzers, a
>MicroMint Std-bus computer... <CLIP>
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Hey.
Along the lines of last week's "specialty" thread, I'm kind of curious
where the various members (including and especially lurkers) live.
Maybe more to the point, where our various machines and parts dumps
reside....
I've managed so far never to touch a database, but this strikes me as
an interesting-enough and simple-enough first project. I'm interested
in listing and correlating several things:
Skillset resources - who knows what, where. For instance, if I had an
Amiga with catweasel hardware and I knew Grumpy ol' Fred lived 30 miles
away, I might just drive out one Saturday, set it up, and learn
something. Or whatever.
Collections. Who has what, where. I travel nationwide (when there's
work to do, that is), and if I know a list-member lives in the area I'll
be in, I might arrange to see their collection, or even do some very
rare face-to-face trading.
Commercial regional and local parts and components resources. Most of
us seem to have pet electronics suppliers in our areas.
Wish lists. Who _wants_ what, where.
What do we do when we're not playing with very old toys? (Yeah, I
know. Look for older toys)
We could do this as an online db, although I doubt that we'd want a
lot of it public.
Comments?
Doc
In a message dated 2/11/2002 8:35:34 PM Eastern Standard Time,
normanalcott(a)worldnet.att.net writes:
<< StarLink: I have one unopened package of StarLink.
Information from the package: >>
I think I have this setup as well with software called 10link or something
like that. Isnt it just ethernet?
--
Antique Computer Virtual Museum
www.nothingtodo.org
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002, Jeff Hellige wrote:
> > > But as you pointed out, it will slow it down. My boot hard
> >> disk is a wide SCSI drive, so I'd just as soon not have it drop back
> >> to the SCSI-2 speed of the interface for my scanner, which is an
> >> older Relisys Infinity Scorpio. I also use the narrow interface for
> >> checking out smaller (40MB-1GB) SCSI hard disks that I pick up.
> >
> >A narrow device *will not* slow down a wide bus.
>
> Ok, you're telling me that if I have:
>
> - a wide SCSI adapter, such as an Adapter 2940U2B, running at
> 40mhz and I have the adapter set to SCSI ID# 7
> - a wide SCSI hard disk, such as an IBM DDRS-39130D, set at
> SCSI ID# 0 and also running at 40mhz
>
> The above settings are the default ID# for the 2940U2B and
> ID# 0 is the factory default for the boot drive on the Macintosh both
> are installed in. 15 total SCSI ID#'s available on the 2940U2B.
>
> That if I add a narrow SCSI hard disk, take your pick,
> running at the fast-SCSI rate of 10mhz, that it won't slow the wide
> SCSI bus down? That goes contrary to what I've seen and I've seen
> plenty of narrow drives have a problem running on a bus that much
> faster. That's why Adaptec's PowerDomain Control software allows you
> to manually tailor the bus speed to try and find a happy medium for
> all the devices you have on the bus.
You're adding another variable. You're adding a disk at *10MHz*. If you
add a narrow disk at *40MHz* then it won't slow down the SCSI bus.
Peace... Sridhar
> I'm not trying to be argumentative, but if I'm
> misunderstanding something, and have been for quite a long time if
> that's the case, I'd like to be corrected.
>
> Jeff
> --
> Home of the TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ File
> http://www.cchaven.com
> http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:foo@siconic.com]
> Help them out. Point them to Google. Problem solved.
Well, yes and no. Actually this list has been infinitely more
helpful to me in recent months than google. :) ISTR, veronica,
last I used it, was as helpful as google is now, at least. That's
without nearly so much crap to sift through, too.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
Hi,
Not quite 10-years old, but...
I've misplaced the software development kit (SDK) for my
OnHandPC (the 16-bit DOS computer on a watch).
www.onhandpc.com apparently died, and the domain is now a porn site
(no, not "digital", as in the recent thread :)
www.matsucom.com apparently also died, and is parked.
Does anyone have a copy? (Basically, Cygnus gcc with header
files and (IIRC) a translation/reformatting program.)
BTW, you can allegedly buy an OnHandPC from "shoplite" at:
http://www.shoplite.com/onhand.htm
for $225.
thanks,
Stan
Stan Sieler sieler(a)allegro.com
www.allegro.com/sieler/wanted/index.htmlwww.allegro.com/sieler
Is anyone here familiar with a RK05 tester? Any idea exactly what it is,
and what it is capable of testing? I'm looking into possibly buying one.
-Lawrence LeMay
On Feb 11, 22:21, Tony Duell wrote:
> So yes, it can be got to work. But it's not trivial (as far as I can
> remember, the commericial process involved a catalyst as well).
Both commercial processes do (well, the NO2 in the lead chamber process
isn't strictly a catalyst, but it goes in one end and is mostly recovered
at the other, so it's similar). It's a question of speed and yield.
> I am not saying that there is _no_ SO3 produced without a catalyst (so
> that, for example, I would easily believe that 'acid rain' contains some
> sulphric acid produced by the oxidation of SO2 in the atmosphere)
It does. A good proportion of SO2 is converted to sulphuric acid by the
action of strong sunlight on the SO2 and water vapour. A slow process,
though. The major constituents of acid rain are SO2 and various nitrogen
oxides, roughly 70% and 30% respectively.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>Well, I've seen a few parallel ports that lost their magic smoke after an
>external SCSI zip drive was plugged into them. I'd have to say it at least
>isn't safe to mix up parallel and scsi ports...
I know the Mac SE will survive having its SCSI port connected to a
parallel printer. Although the Mac will not boot unil the cable is
removed (it will sit with a flashing ? as the printer will confuse it,
and it will fail to check the SCSI chain for a boot device).
I know this because I had a location do just this... and then bitch that
the Mac was dead (and then ship it to me FedEx P1 to fix... costing the
company about 10 times the value of the Mac in shipping charges).
They left everything connected (literally, they just took a big box,
dropped the printer in it, then dropped the SE on top, followed by the
keyboard and mouse... leaving ALL cables still interconnected!).
One look at the printer cable and I knew what the problem was that was
keeping the Mac from booting... I wasn't very surprised the office staff
had done this... but I WAS very surprised to see the Mac boot fine as
soon as I removed the parallel cable... I had figured they fried the SCSI
bus.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
On Feb 11, 21:29, Tony Duell wrote:
> There are stories of some UK machine (I want to say BBC Master, but...)
> being shipped with a lithium battery installed in place of a NiCd but
> still having the charger circuit enabled. Apparently it wasn't unheard-of
> for said battery to make a large hole in the cover....
It was an Acorn/BBC Master 128, but it only happened once, and it didn't
make a hole. However, it did happen in a teaching hospital, so there was
rather a lot of fuss about it. When Acorn realised what had happened, they
recalled all the lithium battery packs and replaced them with Duracell
packs.
I worked for Acorn at the time, and was peripherally involved in the
recall. Basically, I had to contact/visit all the dealers, education
authorities, and service centres in my patch and make sure they surrendered
all the lithium packs, both in machines, as held as spares, in exchange for
the replacements. Acorn didn't want to risk any repeat performance.
I can't remember much of the detail now, but I do remember having a
lifetime supply of 3V AA lithium cells (non-rechargable variety).
Unfortunately, "lifetime" means "shelf life" :-(
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On 10-Feb-2002 Tony Duell wrote:
[...]
> Difficult != impossible. I am told it's difficult to repair HP9100
> calculators. Doesn't mean I don't attempt it ;-)
OKOK, I'll try... ;-)
[...]
> That is possible. I worked on an HP9000/835 a few years back (not my
> machine, so I can't check any details now), and I remember that one of
> the 'logic' boards had to be in place for the PSU to start up. And it
> wasn't just a dummy load -- we tried that.
If that's the case I'll have to connect the PSU to the computer
to test it :-(
bye
--
What the gods would destroy they first submit to an IEEE standards
committee.
FWIW
Several times there have been discussions on this list about wheather or
not IBM ever made cassette drives for use with the original IBM PCs. The
general feeling is that they never made any cassette drives or tapes. BUT I
was talking to Mike Haas about this recently and he told me that he has an
original IBM Diagnstics cassette tape! Today he sent a picture and I've
posted it here <http://www.classiccmp.org/hp/ibm/ibm-cass.jpg> . As you
can see it has the same burgundy color as the standard IBM PC diagnostics
disks.
Joe
On Feb 11, 9:22, Russ Blakeman wrote:
> How many pins does the centronics have? Might be SCSI if it's Centronics
50
> rather than 36. The 20 is probably a db25 that is also an alternate SCSI.
You mean "Centronics-style", I think :-) "Centronics" connectors are
36-pin.
Anyway, it's not SCSI. It's a proprietary HP interface, and the 20-pin
connector is for a proprietary HP sheet feeder.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Feb 11, 9:44, Joe wrote:
> I wa swaiting for his. You're right. but SO2 can react with O2 and
> moisture in the air to form H2SO4. In fact, that's how sulfuric acid is
(or
> was) prodused commercailly. I certain proportion of H2SO3 is also
produced
> I'm told that it's only a small amount and it's some how removed and
> retreated to form H2SO4.
No, it's not, and never was. There's practically no reaction at room
temperature and pressure. In fact it's very easy to turn SO3 back into SO2
and oxygen. Just leave it alone for a while.
In the normal "Contact process", SO2 is passed over a catalyst at about 500
deg F, usually VO5 (Vanadium Pentoxide, not hairspray) commercially, or
occasionally platinum (in demos) because it *doesn't* normally react with
oxygen. The SO3 is then dissolved in concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4)
because it doesn't dissolve very rapidly in water, particularly when warm,
and and the heat of solution would boil water. The concentrated sulphuric
acid becomes fuming sulphuric acid ("oleum", H2S2O7) and cold water is
continuously added to reduce that to concentrated sulphuric acid again.
The other practical[1] method uses very hot concentrated nitric+sulphuric
acid as an oxygen carrier -- again, because the oxidation of SO2 is too
slow and the activation energy would be far too high otherwise. The SO2,
at about 500 deg F (again) combines with NO2 (from the nitric acid) and
water to give H2SO4 and nitric oxide; the nitric oxide is then re-oxidised
to nitrogen dioxide, which in water gives nitric acid again. Now all you
have to do is separate the two acids.
[1] Perfectly practical providing you have some concentrated nitric acid, a
whole lot of stainless steel tubing, a couple of lead vessels (this process
is called the "lead chamber process") and a tower built of acid-resistant
bricks, and a water cooling tower.
> Yes, but that's a lot less S02 than the amount in the batteries. I'm
not
> suggesting that everyone of the room is going to die but if one of the
> batteries ruptures, it will certainly empty the room in a hurry!
There's not much in a battery. The equivalent of about 1/4 teaspoonful of
sulphur at most, and I suspect, much less.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:foo@siconic.com]
> Yes, yes, yes and yes. I neglected to mention TK50 (but have
> a drive), I
> don't know what QIC-1000 is but I want a drive for it. And
> with regards
> to the last two, if you read my message you know that I
> already specified
> those.
Sorry. I did read it, but it's been a couple of days, and I'd
forgotten (not surprisingly. :)
QIC-1000 is -- I think -- a higher-capacity cartridge drive
similar to the QIC-120.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
On Feb 11, 23:39, Dave Brown wrote:
> I recently acquired an old HP scanner- 9190AU. Can anyone give me more
> information on this unit- HP don't support it anymore. (it is old!)
>
> It looks to be almost the original Scanjet, as that's what it has on the
> front, HP Scanjet, with no letters or numerals following. The 9190AU
> designator is on the nameplate underneath. It has a Centronics
connector
> on the back and came with a std IBM printer cable, so I guess is a
parallel
> port version. But there is another oddball ( 20? pin) connector on the
back
> too. What's it for?
>
> I don't have any software for it but I believe the original drivers were
Win
> 3.1x only, so suggestions as to getting software to run it would be
useful
> as well.
It is indeed the original Scanjet; 9195 is the Scanjet+ Both used an HP
ISA card with a proprietary parallel interface, but SCSI-like protocols.
There is some support for it in SANE (Scanner Access Now Easy). If you
look in one of my colleagues's ftp directoriues, you'll find a couple of
relevant files:
http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/ftpdir/pub/james/hp.diffhttp://www.cs.york.ac.uk/ftpdir/pub/james/hporig.patch
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> Craftsman tools were available at any Sears store; Snap-On had a few
> outlets, but sold mostly through trucks that went to garages. (One time,
> on a cross-country drive, I started having some serious problems with a VW
> bus, and pulled over a Snap-On truck on the freeway in Ohio in order to
> buy a 30mm (1 3/16) socket)
Never pulled them over, but when a Snap-On socket or wrench breaks
(twice per decade), I carry them in the glove box until I see a
Snap-On dealer truck parked somewhere, then go do business.
> A few years back, Sears closed a lot of their stores, and even closed down
> their mail-order and catalog operations!
The Craftsman Tools catalog remains in publication...
> I think that Craftsman is still owned by Sears, but not sure. Anybody
> know for sure?
Yes, but the firms that actually manufacter the tools no longer have
exclusive contracts with Sears. For example, EASCO is one line of hand
made by one of the Craftsman manufacturers.
Regards,
-dq
In a message dated 2/10/2002 7:23:43 PM Eastern Standard Time,
rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com writes:
> Several times there have been discussions on this list about wheather or
> not IBM ever made cassette drives for use with the original IBM PCs. The
> general feeling is that they never made any cassette drives or tapes. BUT I
> was talking to Mike Haas about this recently and he told me that he has an
> original IBM Diagnstics cassette tape! Today he sent a picture and I've
> posted it here <http://www.classiccmp.org/hp/ibm/ibm-cass.jpg> . As you
> can see it has the same burgundy color as the standard IBM PC diagnostics
> disks.
>
I have the same tape as well. Havent tried it out yet though.
Ouch -- that's cold...
At 11:50 AM 2/11/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>I like to handle these by sending the postmaster at the offending domain
>a nice congratulatory note on having joined the Falun Gong. (I wish I
>could say I was the first to come up with the idea, but I saw it on
>Usenet.)
At 03:48 PM 8/02/2002 -0500, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
> > Ron Hudson wrote:
>
> > Is it just me, or didn't someone here offer to take the
> > lead on setting up a ClassicCmp UUCP map months ago?
> > Or is that just symptomatic of excessive Red Bull
> > intake on my part?
>
>All depends on what you're mixing it with.... ;)
>
>Yes, several of us had a full head of steam to do this...
>I could dedicate a 486 running Linux to it and could
>have it online from 8am to 5pm daily... as long as
>someone puts together a step-by-step...
We should think about tunnelling UUCP over IP. That way we could use our
existing IP links. This would certainly make it easier (read cheaper) for
overseas nodes to exist.
Huw Davies | e-mail: Huw.Davies(a)kerberos.davies.net.au
| "If God had wanted soccer played in the
| air, the sky would be painted green"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Wright [mailto:dtwright@uiuc.edu]
> Just out of curiosity, does this indicate that the tapes I
> gave you actually
> work? ;-)
Indeed. :) Some better than others. I was going to start out
by installing a relatively early version but couldn't get that
particular version to boot. I've taken that to mean that either
the version is too old for the M/120, or that I'm booting it
improperly.
At any rate, I've tried a good three sets of system tapes, all of
which seem to work. (Now to get those other computers running...)
That said, I plan to back the things up onto images sometime soon,
and eventually to try booting one of the M/120s off of a DAT with
the image copied onto it, and possibly a CD-ROM with a dump of the
newly installed system disk. (That would be amusing if it will
work...)
I hear from a friend that I may be able to get an external SCSI
qic1000(?) soon which would read those tapes without making it
necessary to use the MIPS machine for it. I may take that option,
since the CD writer is internal, in a different machine.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay West [mailto:west@tseinc.com]
> Ok, I have been watching the UUCP network thread. I have one
> question - WHY?
Lots of reasons:
JavaScript, Banner Ads, THIS REALLY WORKED FOR ME!!!!,
Registration Required, AOL, Microsoft, "You are not using a
frames-enabled browser," "Your browser does not support
cookies," "These documents are only available in MS Word
format," "This page is best viewed in 800x600 resolution with
internet explorer 4.0 or greater..."
Need I say more? Internet is starting to really suck. Maybe
we can all do better out of our own basements.
UUCP certainly lowers the bar for entry and maintenance of a
useable node to the point where anyone can grab a peesee out
of the dumpster and plug in. (Provided that they know at
least one person who is already connected...) Everybody has
an even chance to participate and contribute. Even those of
us who like to use computers that wouldn't generally use TCP.
:)
A 20 or 30 node UUCP network could probably hold all of the
useful information I've seen on the internet in the last three
years.
As long as the network remains a manageable size, you could
probably count on government to not get involved much, and
the type of business that caused so much trouble on the
internet wouldn't be interested. There's also the fact that
the small level of knowledge required to set up a node, or even
connect to one would be sufficient to weed out utter idiots.
This is no longer true for internet.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> I'm still searching for a hand operated coil winding machine. I've only
> seen a few, and they were all still in use by other people. If anyone
> finds one they don't want, even in non-working or incomplete condition,
> let me know. These things are likely considered antiques now.
I could be wrong, but I believe these are still listed
in the Allied Electronics catalog...
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Kennedy [mailto:chris@mainecoon.com]
> Uh, just _which_ libertarian ethos was that? ARPAnet had no such
> thing, and NFSnet had acceptable use policies up the ass. The only
> thing out there that had any such "libertarian ethos" was the
> bang-path hell of UUCP connected systems.
That's about what I think of it, and personally, I'm all for bringing
that bang-path hell back. ;)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
I like to handle these by sending the postmaster at the offending domain
a nice congratulatory note on having joined the Falun Gong. (I wish I
could say I was the first to come up with the idea, but I saw it on
Usenet.)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Girnius [mailto:thedm@sunflower.com]
> Believe it or not, some of us are. My first computer was a
> Sinclair, I
> learned basic on it, I've even chatted on IRC with it at a
> blazing 300 baud,
> and it was the first computer I ever programmed on, learned
> BASIC on it in
> fact. It had a great manual that someone whom had never
So you learned BASIC on it twice? :)
> seen a computer
> before could learn more about it. The Sinclair, Spectrum, Speccy or
> whatever you wish to refer to them as, was the begining of my computer
> knowledge. This foundation has provided the initial blocks
> for the 12 years
> I have been a Sysadmin professionally for. Oh, did I mention
> we had to
> solder it together as a kit too?
Great. I think there are many people here who love Spectrums, but
the question is, why pay money per game to download Spectrum games
to your home phone and play them for some limited time, when you can
have the real thing probably for much less? :)
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
>
>Anybody have any single-sided, hard-sectored 8" disks they'd be willing to
>part with? Need some for the old Wang OIS.
>
I diverted several dumpster-bound boxes of Nashuas a while back.
They are labeled FD-132D WP-R ss/dd Hard-Sec 9024-300. These are
not notched, look to be unused, NOS.
Let me know if these fit the bill. Yours for the postage.
-nick
Hi everybody.
I have a curiosity which I hope to satisfy with this question,
and I hope that somebody knowledgeable with the history of
Silicon Graphics or MIPS can help me out here.
On working with the MIPS RISComputers that I have (one in full
working order -- no drive light yet -- with three more and a
drive light to follow), it occurs to me that the entire feel of
the machine is astoundingly close to that of an SGI.
To give some examples:
The boot monitor is somewhat close -- using the same or similar
commands, and the same or similar naming scheme for devices.
The install script for RISC/OS and SGIs 'inst' are similar in
ways. The FROM environment variable in the RISC/OS installer,
and the 'from' command in inst, as an example.
Directory structure is very close, and the configuration files
seem to be in very similar locations -- by this, I mean more so
than is normal between different unix systems.
"The System is Coming Up" (Yes, this message is in the default
install for both systems)
These are all just superficial things, but they lead me to
guess that there was a large amount of heritage from RISC/OS to
modern IRIX. I assume this would have shown up around IRIX 2.0
(was 1.0 the IRIS 2000/3000 version?)
Does anyone know whether I've come to the wrong conclusion?
Does anyone know how deep the resemblance goes? I would be
tempted to try a RISC/OS binary on an IRIX system at some
point.
In short, is anyone familiar enough with Silicon Graphics and/
or MIPS to explain this?
Regards,
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerome Fine [mailto:jhfine@postoffice.idirect.com]
> I have a problem - am I the one at fault?
I'm not sure there's a "fault" here. I certainly wouldn't blame you
for wanting to do a proper backup.
> (a) The firmware/software for the "RAID 1" controller seems to
> NOT have anything that will alert the user to be able to identify
> which disk drive might be bad even after a drive failure, let alone
> intermittent errors.
Well, if a drive fails completely, just unplug one, and if the
system still boots, you've unplugged the failed unit ;)
> (b) Even though my current files are (seemingly) all correct and
> I have two duplicate copies, when I said that I was was going to
> restore from my initial back-up from CD (I currently have no
> data files, just the installed software), I was looked at as if
> I was a bit crazy - why would I do a recovery if there is nothing
> wrong? Even though I attempted to explain that a full back-up
Personally, I'd recover to a "spare" disk, and try that disk out
afterwards. No reason to possibly trash a more-or-less working
installation if the recovery fails the first time.
Otherwise it sounds reasonable.
> includes the total recovery from scratch - at least a few times
> at the beginning to establish that the procedure works, that attitude
> is considered overcautious to say the least - at the worst it is:
> "So what if you loose all you files, you can always rebuild the
> system from scratch if you have to?" These individuals seem
> to have never heard of data files - like in a legal office, the
> client records don't need to be kept since everything in published
> law books is how to start all over again after a fire.
I think this is the windows mindset. "We can always re-build the
entire system, data files and all (since our data files will all be
corrupt by then) once a month or so." Some people tell me that they've
had better luck with windows than this, of course, YMMV.
The point is that after losing so much data to poor practices -- on the
part of the user, and the people who wrote the o/s -- what's there to
be afraid of? Taken a step further, what's the point in a backup at
all?
That's not my attitude, but I've seen it. It also seems that most
"new" system management types consider backups to simply be an
annoyance, and more often than not will do anything possible to get
out of having to restore anything...
> Is this attitude common in industry? Am I wrong? I know that
> my wife has a cousin who works for an accountant who
> NEVER makes a back-up of the client files.
I try not to do business with people who have such poor data management
practices... Had you given the name of the business, this would have
probably kept me away from them for life.
> If I am correct, is there any way to get my point across or is
> this a Catch-22 situation?
Wait until there is a failure and they actually need a backup.
Announce that you have a backup, indeed, but it only contains 9000
copies of a file called README. :)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
To all those on the list - I'm finally getting around to severing all ties
with my old company. Please make a note of my new email address
jwest(a)classiccmp.org
The old address (west(a)tseinc.com) is no longer active
Regards,
Jay West
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John R. Keys Jr. [mailto:jrkeys@concentric.net]
> Sent: 11 February 2002 15:44
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: WHERE IS YOUR MUSEUM? Was:Re: What's your specialty?
>
>
> It's nice to see someone else reaching their goal with having
> a museum.
> Where is it located? Best of luck with it.
Ta :) It's in the North-East of England. The building itself needs a lot of
cleaning up since the current occupier has a plaster moulding company - the
whole place is practically white top to bottom! The roof needs fixing and it
needs security measures too, but size wise it's spot on, and the ground
floor is concrete so there's space for some big DEC iron there too......
Best of all it's 50 yards from the house.....
a
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk