>I went to their web site and searched for all stores in and around
>Houston within 100 miles and got zero hits?
There are NONE in Houston or the surrounding 100 miles?!?
Man... I have 2 in Paramus and 1 in Ramsey... all within 5 minutes of
each other! And other 3 more that I can think of within a 15-20 minute
drive.
You poor Texans must feel left out (now I see why my mother left TX and
came to NJ)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>Jay West wrote:
>
> I have noticed a few pieces of spam lately on the list. Our mail server
> checks all the normal relaying databases, so that has kept most of the
spam
> out for ages. However, now a few have trickled in and it bugs me a bit.
In
> the past it has been suggested that the list be closed - ie. only
> subscribers could post to the list. I have always avoided that because
> fairly frequently someone will post from a non-subscriber that they have
> equipment available, and I don't want to take that opportunity away from
the
> list. I see two options:
>
> 1) I can close the list from non-subscriber posts
> or perhaps
> 2) I can require non-subscriber posts be approved before I send them to
the
> list
>
> I would prefer to do number 2 above. However, this does give me the
ability
> to occasionally see available equipment before the rest of the list. Of
> course I wouldn't abuse this, but - I don't even want that perception.
> So.... advice please?
>
> Regards,
>
> Jay Wests
Frankly, I'm getting tired of the off topic posts, the spam, and the other
trivial BS that is being posted. IMHO, the list should be moderated. If that
means that you'd have first shot at some really cool gear... So be it.
That's one of the reward's for hosting the list.
My $.02
SteveRob
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
The one nearest me is so bad...
>1. You learn that the Radio Shack slogan, "you've got questions, we've got
>answers"' is true. They have answers alright, it just may not be the right
>ones!
They don't have answers... their conversation skills are limited to
chatting with other clerks, or trying to explain to me why I should drop
my cell phone plan, and sign a contract with them.
>2. The people that work there think you are trying to contact someone from
>Mars or outer space, with all the cables, adapters, connectors, etc., that
>you buy there every week.
They don't know what any of them do... nor where (or what) Mars is.
>3. You think of opening your own store, because with a name like Radio
>Shack, they ought to sell lots and lots of amateur radio equipment.
Nah... then I would be forced to employee morons. Oh wait... I do that
now anyway.
>4. You know your way around the store better than the employees that work
>there.
That is a given... and god forbid one of them TRIES to help... I end up
wasting more time trying to explain that I don't need what they are
saying, I know what I am looking for, get away (and NO I don't want a
freaking cell phone from you!)
>5. You spend so much time and money driving there, you think of buying one
>of everything.
The only reason I still go is because I am too impatient to wait 3 days
for parts to be shipped to me (that and most dealers have a $25 or so min
order... when all I need 99 cents of resistors)
>6. The people who work there think you own one heck of a radio station, (in
>a way it might be a little truth to that), or you're trying to build a bomb.
And god forbid you try to purchase a portable auto dialer... if they
think everyone makes red boxes out of them... WHY do they continue to
sell them?!? (although, I'm not sure I have seen them recently... but now
they have mini digital audio recorders... which are even easier to turn
into all sorts of cool fun toys.)
>7. You realize you know more about electronics and computers than they do.
I think we have already established that cats know more about electronics
and computers than any run of the mill clerk does.
>8. You spend more money in a week at Radio Shack than you do on food.
Humm... not recently, but I can think of a time in my life when I did
(now I spend more on old computers, or odd Mac parts)
>9. You know everyone who works there by their first name.
Nope, that would require looking at them... only one clerk is worthy of
looking at... and only because she is REALLY REALLY attractive (but once
she starts pushing those cell phones... I want to choke her too)
>10. You have your own private parking spot there.
Its in a mall, so no luck on that one
>11. When they call you for a stocking item because they are out.
They can't call me... I still give them my parents info when they ask my
name, phone number, address, zodiac sign, favorite color, and pets names
just so I can buy a freaking battery.... and NO, I do NOT want a cell
phone!!!
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>I've come up against a few companies that do that. It's the reason I'll
>no longer consider Sharp products, for example.
Odd... here in the States, Sharp will deal directly to the public... you
don't even have to go thru a reseller (I have actually picked up Sharp
parts by driving up the road to the Sharp factory and just walked in... I
got a bunch of drive tires that way). Unless their policy has changed in
the last 5 or 6 years (last sharp part I bought was a remote for a TV
about 6 years ago).
>Hmmm... Is there a PAL equivalent to this deck?
Don't know... I'm not even sure how to check, as the TV/VCRs are OEM'd by
Funai, but sold under the name Symphonic, and there is almost no info
about them on the company web site (too old I guess)
>There are also sets of felt washers available to
>be used to rebuild worn-out VCR clutches if it's that type of device. Or
>can you do the old kludgers trick of turning the friction washer over or
>something?
They are felt clutches... and I tried rebuilding them with new felts...
no luck... I couldn't seem to get it exactly right (never found exactly
the right thickness). It always ended up either too little friction and
it ate the tape, or too much friction and it stretched the tape.
At least the TVs still work fine... so I gave them out to family/friends
to use as 13" remote control, cable ready TVs. I still keep my eyes open
hoping some day to find a way to get the replacement parts so I can get
the VCRs working again.
Its actually about time for me to give Funai another call and see if they
will sell me parts (I bug them about every 6 months, figure maybe one of
these times I'll get someone who doesn't know any better and will sell me
the stuff... of course, one of my pit falls is, they will only sell via
part number, and the clutches aren't stamped, so they need to look up the
part, which keys them off that I am not an authorized repair center, and
they nix the order... so I guess if I can just find the part number I
might be golden to sneak thru)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
but at that precise time something will happen which has not
occurred for 1,001 years
exept for the time 11:11 11/11 1111.
As the clock ticks over from 8.01pm on Wednesday, February 20, time
will,
for sixty seconds only, read in perfect symmetry 2002, 2002, 2002,
or to be
more precise - 20:02, 20/02, 2002.
and will never happen again.
exept for the time 21:12 21/12 2112.
Lee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This email is intended only for the above named addressee(s). The
information contained in this email may contain information which is
confidential. The views expressed in this email are personal to the sender
and do not in any way reflect the views of the company.
If you have received this email and you are not a named addressee please
delete it from your system and contact Merlin Communications International
IT Department on +44 20 7344 5888.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:21:05 -0800
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)aracnet.com>
> Subject: Re: Honeywell 316 Question
>
> >I suppose "picked up" was a bit of an understatement. However I don't think
> >the reality of the fact that a Honeywell 316 is sitting in my sun room has
> >quite sunk in. Thank you for the advice. I will certainly follow it.
>
> Which brings up the point of what I'm wondering. Just how big is a
> Honeywell 316? What peripherals does it support, and what OS's? I'm only
> familiar with DPS-6, DPS-8, and DPS-8000 systems, and of those, even the
> DPS-6 isn't exactly small.
Google is your friend. See
< http://users.ids.net/~mikeu/h316/index.shtml >
A contemporary of the PDP-11/20. the H-316 was about the same size.
19" rack width, about 30" deep. Somewhat taller, perhaps 8U (14").
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu
***Yes, this is off topic, but I know some of you can help a little,
off-list that is...
Well, I am the proud new owner of a Sun Ultra1 Creator machine ( p/n
600-4385-01). It came with 128 MB of RAM (2 pieces - 501-2480-78431410 and
501-2480-78431417), and a Creator video card. The video card has the 13W3
connector, and looks like a 1/8" jack.
No drives included. But then again, what do you expect for $50?
Couple quick questions, and yes, I do know about SunSolve online...
- The info I found on the Creator card, (501-4127-061144) says the 1/8" jack
is stereo. Okay, stereo what? Sound in or out?
- I have the Sun/Hitachi 19 inch tube. It's safe to assume that the Creator
can handle the weight, and the Hitachi can handle the video output, right?
- Apparently, the Creator3D is listed as not supported in NetBSD, and the
SBus cgsix is. I assume the Creator I have is lumped with the 3D. I guess
I'll yank the video from my 1+ for now. Anybody working on the Creator
support?
This is my To-Do/To-Get list. Hopefully someone will correct me if
I'm wrong, or help out with parts...
- Take floppy drive from SPARCstation 1+
- Install CD-ROM, need to find power wire harness (p/n 530-2176)
- Need to find speaker and LED wire (p/n 530-2175), or at least a pinout...
- Get a fan in the front there by the HDDs... Looks like a wrestling match
to get that out.
- Wait for the HDD spuds to arrive in the mail...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 90581
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
You guys would know if anyone does...
Is there any market for used HP Laserjet Font cartridges? I just fell
into an apple box full of them and don't know whether to keep, sell or pitch.
Jim
Hello People,
I just set up a new shelf unit from InterMetro for my TV and my
audio/video system in my living room. My Amp is an old Onkyo from the
early 70's. I need to clean the switches and pots. I get reduced sound
output occasionally and I can usually fix it by wiggling a few of the
switches, so I'm thinking a good cleaning is in order. I tried once
before, but used an electrical cleaner, probably not meant for fine
electronic use. Also, I didn't remove the faceplate, so I didn't have
very good access.
What can I buy, hopefully at Radio Shack, that I can clean the switches
with? Also, is there some sort of lubricant I should spray into the
switches afterwards? I like my audio/video system as it's a mix of new
amd old, but I need it to sound good besides look cool!
Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Donzelli [mailto:aw288@osfn.org]
> about some relatively new Windows bug, slamming AOLers
> because they are
> such "losers", and pot shots at Bill Gates. There are plenty of other
> places to rip these people to shreds. On this list, it is
> just plain old
> _noise_.
I guess I can agree there. The impression I got was that that you'd
like not to see any of it. I might even agree with that, but given
the topic of the list, it's bound to come up, and that was my point.
> > PeeCees (I assume in the IBM sense) older than 10 years, are,
> > according to the FAQ, and no matter how much you or I may dislike
> > them _on topic machines_
> The term "PeeCee" generally means cheap clone. Real IBMs get better
> respect that that. I am talking about crappy 386plus
> machines. Talking
> about them really dilutes the interest in this list.
I agree, except (I'm not good with chronology) that I think some cheap
generic 386 clones may be on topic these days. Again, according to
what I've read about the topic of this list, they can't be considered
off-topic. I don't like them, but I'm sure some people do.
> With this argument, almost _anything_ electronic can be
> related to classic
> computers. You have to draw the line somewhere. Are digital watches
Ok, so I was on a roll ;)
> included? Microwave ovens? Alarm systems? Radios and Radars?
> CD players?
> Audio amps? All of these _could_ be called "computers", simply because
> they have some sort of analog computation or digital electronics, but
> I think that might really be going over the line.
Seriously, though, I think at least any digital computer should be
considered (and perhaps analog computers). That's personal opinion;
take it for what it's worth.
I'd also note that I haven't seen any spark computer (as opposed to
sparc computer) discussions in the old car threads.
> The problem here is that _almost_invariably_ the threads turn
> to "Linux is
> so great, Windows sucks, I have Linux running on
True, though, again, strictly speaking, a thread on the historical
ratio of bugs in windows vs. linux may be on topic.
> such-and-such Pentium".
This, of course, wouldn't.
> This is NOT classic computing at this point, and should be moved to an
> appropriate forum (and there are several hundred of them, at
> least). This
True -- the minute you remove the "classic" stuff from the discussion,
it becomes off-topic.
> is _not_ a Unix sysadmin list. If you want to run Linux on an
> old machine
> - great (although I don't see why - the fastest way to
> cheapen a VAX is
> to have it run Unix - personal opinion) - but keep the topic
FWIW, I share that particular opinion too.
> focussed on the old machine, _not_ the newest version of Linux. Linux
> _itself_ is basically off topic, as only a tiny percentage of the talk
> about it refers to the early releases.
In that sense, yes, but there are plenty of 10+ year old computers
that will handle running it, so if the discussion were on how to get
one of these computers to talk with linux, I'd consider it on topic.
> It just might be common sense, however. I am _not_ saying that these
> threads should be nipped off at the bud. If a moderator was
> to exercise a
> little control when the threads get out of hand, perhaps throwing the
> offenders in the "penalty box" for a short amount of time,
I'm not a big fan of "penalty boxes," but you're right in saying that it
might help. My original beef with the idea was only that the subjects
you mentioned as off topic were sometimes very plausibly "dead on."
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
>MCM Electronics, amongst others, carries various clutch felts. I don't thik
>it's so much the thickness as the density and possibly some sort of additive
>to make them stiff.
I have tried MCM (actually, that is my supplier of choice), and using
assorted different premade clutches that are similar... as well as just
buying assorted felts, and even a clutch rebuild kit (comes with a dozen
different felts)... I have just struck out on getting it right.
It has gotton to the point that I am not willing to just randomly try
parts anymore... I have sunk around $50 into "trying" and struck out...
and we are talking about bringing back to life, cheap, low quality, 2
head, mono VCRs... in my book... not worth the continued experimentation
costs. When/if I find the correct part... I will buy a dozen of them, and
fix the 5 units I have (and keep the others as spares)... but until
then... they have been religated to plain old TV duty.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Douglas Quebbeman [mailto:dhquebbeman@theestopinalgroup.com]
>
> > My understanding is that it ran a small single-user disk-based OS
> > and possibly a realtime OS... Bill Poduska and David Udin & Co.
> > worked with these a bit and based the architecture of the first
> > Prime Computers on the Honeywell 316. I always assumed that the
> > early Prime DOS and RTOS were made to resemble something they'd
> > used before (they weren't ready yet for their magnum opus).
>
> According to what I've read in preparation for picking one up,
> later Prime systems also have the instruction set(s) for these
> in the core.
Oh yeah, they've got the same sector-zero-relative addressing mode;
I mostly worked with the later 50-series instruction set, but I did
a little disassembly of some older code, and it was an enlightning
experience.
-dq
> > I would like to see some reasonably strict moderation, so we can cut out
> > all of the off topic stuff before it (always) gets out of hand. Off topic,
> > meaning Microsoft/AOL bashing, PeeCees, cars (antique or otherwise),
>
> Not to be picky, but:
>
> AOLs early (still bad) software ran on _on topic machines_
>
> Microsofts early (still bad) software ran on _on topic machines_
>
> PeeCees (I assume in the IBM sense) older than 10 years, are,
> according to the FAQ, and no matter how much you or I may dislike
> them _on topic machines_
Bill wasn't complaining about dull topics, just flamewars:
* AOL SUX!
* MICROSOFT SUX!
* COMMODORES RULE!
* MY PET WILL SMOKE YOUR 11/23
&c.
-dq
As seen on Slashdot:
Debian Planet: Installing Debian GNU/Linux on Alphas:
http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?sid=605
This article makes reference to an article on Sellam's website titled
'Finding Vintage Computers - A Primer'.
-Toth
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay West [mailto:jwest@classiccmp.org]
> 1) I can close the list from non-subscriber posts
> or perhaps
> 2) I can require non-subscriber posts be approved before I
> send them to the
> list
> I would prefer to do number 2 above. However, this does give
> me the ability
> to occasionally see available equipment before the rest of
> the list. Of
> course I wouldn't abuse this, but - I don't even want that perception.
> So.... advice please?
Personally it bugs me more when nobody takes these machines than
it does when I'm not the one who takes them. :) In other words,
go ahead and use the approval process, and if that gives you an
occasional edge over everyone for picking up this or that, then
so be it.
Honestly people see these things that we all collect as garbage
anyway, so anyone who waits long enough and looks hard enough
will probably find exactly what they're looking for -- and with
little or no money required, usually.
Well, that's my opinion.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas Quebbeman [mailto:dhquebbeman@theestopinalgroup.com]
> My understanding is that it ran a small single-user disk-based OS
> and possibly a realtime OS... Bill Poduska and David Udin & Co.
> worked with these a bit and based the architecture of the first
> Prime Computers on the Honeywell 316. I always assumed that the
> early Prime DOS and RTOS were made to resemble something they'd
> used before (they weren't ready yet for their magnum opus).
According to what I've read in preparation for picking one up,
later Prime systems also have the instruction set(s) for these
in the core.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doc [mailto:doc@mdrconsult.com]
> THERE on the BOX! 'Windows95 certified!" Jeez. "Linux??? Is that a
> game?"
Tell them "Yes."
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
Jay ---
My vote is for Roger's idea, and if that's not feasible for some
reason, go with #2. Maybe have two people be the authorizing agents (someone
else has volunteered a couple times for this position) to provide an honesty
balance?
Also, what about attaching an identifier to the subject line for not
subscribed addresses? Like, there's "FS" = For Sale, "FA" = For Auction,
etc... Something like [UNK]
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 90581
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> ----------
> From: Roger Merchberger
>
> Rumor has it that Jay West may have mentioned these words:
>
> >2) I can require non-subscriber posts be approved before I send them to
> the
> >list
>
> Jay, I don't want to insult your intelligence, but I've been doing
> listserver & mail server admin for ~~7 years, so if you do need some
> advice, lemme know.
>
> There is a 3rd option, and it's called TMDA, or Tagged Message Delivery
> Agent. (or pretty darned close) It can go right with your list, and
> automatically whitelist anyone who's subscribed, but anyone who's not
> subbed to the list, the message is held in a seperate queue for around 48
> hrs. or so (it's configurable) and a confirmation message is sent back to
> the original sender. If the confirmation is replied to, then the original
> message gets submitted to the list. If it's not, after the timeout period
> the message just falls into the bit-bucket behind the server. ;-)
>
> >I would prefer to do number 2 above. However, this does give me the
> ability
> >to occasionally see available equipment before the rest of the list. Of
> >course I wouldn't abuse this, but - I don't even want that perception.
> >So.... advice please?
>
> TMDA would not give you any opportunity of "early browsing", as you
> wouldn't see the message any sooner than the rest of us. (Unless you were
> combing thru the "waiting for confirmation" queue, and you'd have to catch
> the message before confirmation which for most folks wouldn't take long.)
>
> TMDA can be configured to automatically whitelist anyone who confirms
> their
> first message, then is trusted after that so the only time they'd see a
> new
> confirmation message is if they mailed from a webmail address, or it can
> be
> set up to confirm every time an email arrives from a non-subscriber.
>
> Check here:
> http://software.libertine.org/tmda/
>
> Oh, it can also be set up in a "blacklist" configuration as well.
And 12:11 11/11 1121, etc.
And 22:12 21/12, 2122, etc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Merchberger [mailto:zmerch@30below.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 8:51 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: OT: Once in a Lifetime, Twice in Forever
Rumor has it that Joe may have mentioned these words:
[snip]
>
>The last time there was such a symmetrical pattern was long before the days
>of the digital watch and the 24-hour clock - at 10.01am on January 10,
>1001.
What about 11:11 11/11 1111?
> And because the clock only goes up to 23.59, it is something that
>will never happen again.
Bzzzt. Wrong again. What about:
21:12, 21/12, 2112???
<snip>
> TMDA would not give you any opportunity of "early browsing", as you
> wouldn't see the message any sooner than the rest of us. (Unless you were
> combing thru the "waiting for confirmation" queue, and you'd have to catch
> the message before confirmation which for most folks wouldn't take long.)
Jay-
Either your choice number two, or Roger's TDMA suggestion...
But if you go with #2 and the volume gets excessive, I see
no other choice but option 1.
-dq
In a message dated 2/21/02 9:44:45 AM Eastern Standard Time,
jwest(a)classiccmp.org writes:
> 2) I can require non-subscriber posts be approved before I send them to the
> list
>
>
I think this would work fine Jay.
-Linc.
In The Beginning there was nothing, which exploded - Yeah right...
Calculating in binary code is as easy as 01,10,11.
I think that moderated non-subscriber posts seems to provide the best
balance so long as the volume of non-subscriber messages is relatively low.
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
Congress Financial Corporation
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jay West [mailto:jwest@classiccmp.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:32 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: SPAM - RFC from list admin
I have noticed a few pieces of spam lately on the list. Our mail server
checks all the normal relaying databases, so that has kept most of the spam
out for ages. However, now a few have trickled in and it bugs me a bit. In
the past it has been suggested that the list be closed - ie. only
subscribers could post to the list. I have always avoided that because
fairly frequently someone will post from a non-subscriber that they have
equipment available, and I don't want to take that opportunity away from the
list. I see two options:
1) I can close the list from non-subscriber posts
or perhaps
2) I can require non-subscriber posts be approved before I send them to the
list
I would prefer to do number 2 above. However, this does give me the ability
to occasionally see available equipment before the rest of the list. Of
course I wouldn't abuse this, but - I don't even want that perception.
So.... advice please?
Regards,
Jay Wests
Subject: Once in a Lifetime, Twice in Forever
Once in a Lifetime, Twice in Forever... unless we adopt a new calendar.
8.02pm on February 20 this year will be an historic moment in time.
It will not be marked by the chiming of any clocks or the ringing of bells,
but at that precise time something will happen which has not occurred for
1,001 years and will never happen again.
As the clock ticks over from 8.01pm on Wednesday, February 20, time will,
for sixty seconds only, read in perfect symmetry 2002, 2002, 2002, or to be
more precise - 20:02, 20/02, 2002.
The last time there was such a symmetrical pattern was long before the days
of the digital watch and the 24-hour clock - at 10.01am on January 10,
1001. And because the clock only goes up to 23.59, it is something that
will never happen again.
--Tim VanSant
> >I suppose "picked up" was a bit of an understatement. However I don't think
> >the reality of the fact that a Honeywell 316 is sitting in my sun room has
> >quite sunk in. Thank you for the advice. I will certainly follow it.
>
> Which brings up the point of what I'm wondering. Just how big is a
> Honeywell 316? What peripherals does it support, and what OS's? I'm only
> familiar with DPS-6, DPS-8, and DPS-8000 systems, and of those, even the
> DPS-6 isn't exactly small.
My understanding is that it ran a small single-user disk-based OS
and possibly a realtime OS... Bill Poduska and David Udin & Co.
worked with these a bit and based the architecture of the first
Prime Computers on the Honeywell 316. I always assumed that the
early Prime DOS and RTOS were made to resemble something they'd
used before (they weren't ready yet for their magnum opus).
-dq
p.s.: Didn't the 316 share basic architecture with the 516 & 716?
Y'all,
I went on a donation pickup today (30-odd Compaq P133 junkers) and
after we collected the crap, the guy said "Y'all don't have a way to
dispose of mainframe type stuff, do you?"
They have a PDP11/93 in their IS control room that's still plugged in.
Evidently was in service till a few months ago.
<Quoting Wayne from "Wayne's World", as he ogles that guitar>
Ooohh, yes. It WILL be mine.
<End Quote>
The first problem is that my boss was discussing disposal/hauling fees
with them, so I couldn't act very interested.
The second problem is that I'm completely ignorant of QBus systems, so
even if I had been able to crawl around on it, I'd still be clueless.
Well, I'd probably know the PSU requirements.
It's in a ~36" rack, has 2 tape drives showing with "PDP11/93" badges
on each, in 3U modules. One blank [1] 6U front cover that I assume is
the QBus backplane? and 2 blank [1] 4U units. The rack itself has the
2-inch louvred side-plates.
It looks like it just came out of the crate. Hell, it looks like
somebody polished it yesterday.
So the questions:
Can anybody point me to pictures of an 11/93 that's NOT in a BA23?
What's it worth, obsession aside? It's probably going to cost me about
$0.50/lb, USD. That's delivered to my garage. I'm guessing that's in
the $200 realm.
What's the power input? 110V? 220V? Single/triple phase?
The tape drives looked like the media would be about the size of a
TK50, but there's a horizontal locking lever. I think. I did look at
the badges next to the drives; they just say PDP11/93. Does that mean
there may be 2 CPUs?
There are also a couple of Digital line printers there. I didn't get a
model, but I did see ribbon spools about an inch wide. The one that
comes with its own table.... They are also reputedly working, and also
look like they were polished yesterday. Are they useful?
Aquiring minds want.
Doc
HELP SAVE THE COMPUTER GARAGE!
Jim Willing's Computer Garage has been around for ages. Due to a series
of unfortunate events, the Computer Garage collection is in peril, and
your help is needed.
Jim moved to the midwest last year and has been trying to relocate his
collection. The people in whose hands he left the remainder of the
collection didn't do a good job of keeping up on storage rent, and so now
the collection is in jeopardy of being lost. Additionally, Jim has fallen
on hard times.
Jim is a very swell guy, has been a computer collector for longer than
most of us, and has been a speaker at every single VCF since the
beginning, so I feel I owe him a debt of gratitude and have decided to try
to help him.
For those of you who don't know Jim Willing or have never visited the
Computer Garage, go here:
http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
The Computer Garage is impressive, and needs to stay intact.
I'd like to announce the formation of the Save The Computer Garage Fund.
All proceeds from anything I announce for sale to the list will go towards
this fund. The goal is to raise $1000.
I will be putting up a webpage on the VCF website to solicit donations.
In the meantime, if you would like to contribute to the fund, please
e-mail me and let me know what you can give. Time is of the essence.
I'll be pulling out stuff that I have excess of and posting them to the
list for sale. Watch out for that in the next 24 hours.
Please help if you can. I know times are tough but even $5 will suffice.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
I have often visited Jim's website.
Are donations possible by VISA/MasterCard?
Or by snail-mail, what's the address?
(this is the easiest option for me)
- Henk.
http://home.hetnet.nl/~tshaj
> HELP SAVE THE COMPUTER GARAGE!
>
> Jim Willing's Computer Garage has been around for ages.
> Due to a series of unfortunate events, the Computer Garage
> collection is in peril, and your help is needed.
> For those of you who don't know Jim Willing or have never
> visited the Computer Garage, go here:
> http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
>
> The Computer Garage is impressive, and needs to stay intact.
>
> I'd like to announce the formation of the Save The Computer
> Garage Fund.
> All proceeds from anything I announce for sale to the list
> will go towards this fund. The goal is to raise $1000.
> In the meantime, if you would like to contribute to the fund,
> please e-mail me and let me know what you can give.
> Time is of the essence.
> Please help if you can. I know times are tough but even $5
> will suffice.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vintage Computer Festival [mailto:vcf@vintage.org]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 11:10
> To: Classic Computers Mailing List
> Cc: Bay Area Computer Collector List
> Subject: Fundraiser for Jim Willing's Computer Garage
>
>
>
> HELP SAVE THE COMPUTER GARAGE!
>
> Jim Willing's Computer Garage has been around for ages. Due
> to a series
> of unfortunate events, the Computer Garage collection is in peril, and
> your help is needed.
I'll link off my museum site (Binary Dinosaurs) too. How can us UK types
send in donations?
--
Adrian Graham, Corporate Microsystems Ltd
e: adrian.graham(a)corporatemicrosystems.com
w: www.corporatemicrosystems.com
w2: www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk (Online Computer Museum)
On February 20, Joe wrote:
> As the clock ticks over from 8.01pm on Wednesday, February 20, time will,
> for sixty seconds only, read in perfect symmetry 2002, 2002, 2002, or to be
> more precise - 20:02, 20/02, 2002.
>
> The last time there was such a symmetrical pattern was long before the days
> of the digital watch and the 24-hour clock - at 10.01am on January 10,
> 1001. And because the clock only goes up to 23.59, it is something that
> will never happen again.
I remember 12:34 5/6/78 quite well...it was amusing...
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
St. Petersburg, FL "Less talk. More synthohol." --Lt. Worf
I have complained, via email, to the registered admin contact and the
registered billing contact.
I humbly suggest that everyone do so, *politely*.
Doc
Domain Name: KEYSTONELEARNING.COM
Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.
Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com
Name Server: NS.XMISSION.COM
Name Server: NS1.XMISSION.COM
Updated Date: 30-oct-2001
Registrant:
KeyStone Learning Systems (KEYSTONELEARNING3-DOM)
2241 Larsen Parkway
Provo, UT 84606
US
Domain Name: KEYSTONELEARNING.COM
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
Roth, Jeff (RJ538-ORG) isd(a)KEYLEARNSYS.COM
KeyStone Learning Systems IS Dept.
2241 Larsen Parkway
Provo , UT 84606
US
801-375-8680
Fax- 801-373-6872
Billing Contact:
Clint Argyle (CA59-ORG) clinta(a)KEYLEARNSYS.COM
KeyStone Learning Systems
2241 Larsen Parkway
Provo, UT 84606
US
801-375-8680
Fax- 801-373-6872
This only happens if you happen to record your day/month in the
european order mm/dd (20/02) instead of the us order dd/mm (02/20)
so, for the us, it is
2002 0220 2002
which is not the same effect as you describe..
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg KB1FCA |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
>I am in need of a top cover for a IIe Platinum, the one with the numeric
>keyboard.
This is from a beige colored IIe (at least I think.. it is pretty dirty,
but it really doesn't look platinum... I'll give it a quick squirt with
Simple Green... but unless I tell you otherwise, it is beige).
If you want it anyway, I am sure I can fit the cover in a Priority Mail
box, so shipping will only be $3.50.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Just wanted to let everyone know that 3M Super Strength Adhevise is
absolutely THE WORST adhesive to use on plastics. I bought it
specifically for gluing borken plastic pieces as it is advertised as being
for such, but all it has done in the two projects I've used it with is
make a big mess and ruin everything.
All it does is melts the plastic, causing the broken edges to no longer
fit snugly, and then it gets all over your fingers when you're trying to
press the parts together, which they don't do. It either doesn't make a
good bond and requires regluing which then builds up glue along the edge
ruining the fit, or adheres but the end result looks shitty.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
>> however... I can't believe my $60 VCR had any sweeping effects on store
>> policy).
>
>It wories me that you would consider paying $60 for a new VCR. I'd not
>want to pay less than $500....
Well... I had a specific need for six VCRs... the criteria: Must be
Stereo, Must be same model, Must be disposable.... that last one is why I
bought the on sale, $59.95 models.
For my PERSONAL use... I haven't bought a VCR in ages... I am still using
my old $2000 Sony editing deck (bought from a building landlord's
clearance when the tenant was arrested by the FBI and jailed for printing
his own bank checks... I paid $15 or there abouts). My 2nd VCR is a VERY
old GE VCR... and my 3rd is a recent hitachi salvage from work. All 3 are
older VCRs, that have parts readily available, and I do regular cleanings
and maintenance on them (not crappy cleaning tapes... open them up and
clean them out).
I won't buy a VCR for personal use that I can't readily get repair parts
for. And I REFUSE to buy any made by Funai... since they won't sell parts
except to authorized Funai repair centers... which means I have 5 VCR/TV
combos with useless VCRs because of bad $5 clutches... which the repair
centers want $100 to replace, and won't sell me the *#&#*%# part!
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:15:30 -0500
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> From: Jeff Hellige <jhellige(a)earthlink.net>
> Subject: RE: OT Quad audio amps (was: cleaning pots on my vintage audio am
> p)
>
> >Seriously, though, it's just an amplifier. It shouldn't matter
> >what you're running through it. The signal will be analog only,
> >of course, so no SPDIF without a converter.
>
> I'm about to experiment with hooking a 20 year old Technics
> turntable up to my B/W G3 using a small pre-amp between them. It'll
> allow me to convert all my old vinyl to MP3 as well as provide a
> means of listening to any vinyl without having a full stereo stack
> sitting here. The line-level input on the Mac ought to pass the
> signal on out to the Harman/Kardon Soundsticks without a problem.
Presumably the "small pre-amp" has RIAA equalization. Otherwise you
will have an interesting signal-processing problem.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Chris Wren [mailto:jcwren@jcwren.com]
> Like most netnews groups, SlashDot does not check the
> accuracy of every
> submission. So before you go bashing /. as being stupid
> enough to think a
> DECstation is Alpha based, try bashing the author. Get *your* facts
> straight.
Veering further off topic, I have noticed -- as a personal
observation -- that there is an over-abundance of idiocy on
slashdot. That's even compared to other similar venues.
It's part of the reason I don't read it much any more.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
I have just finished stripping an Apple IIe, and have remaining the shell
(no filler plates for the back), the cover, and a broken keyboard (don't
know if it works, but it is missing a few keys that have been snapped
off, as well as the light cover), no keyboard cable.
These items are free + shipping for anyone that wants them (your IIe
missing a cover? want keyboard parts to rebuild another broken one?). Or
you can pick them up in NJ (07450).
I'm not holding these long... they are on my cart to head to the dumpster
already.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I need the remote control for a Hero Jr. and some cartridges for same.
If any one has spares they want to sell or trade contact me offline at
jrkeys_at_concentric.net. Thanks.
I've missed the beginnings of some of these threads (digest mode -- It's
hard to scroll through and catch all the good bits), but people are looking
for some drive manuals, I gather....
I have a photocopy of a Tandon TM-100 manual, and I also have a photocopy of
a YE Data 8" floppy service manual, but I'm not sure of the model number....
Those looking can contact me off-list for more...
Also, I have some spare TM-100 drives that I'd be willing to give for
postage only. Again, off-list please...
Rich B.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
> Allied Electronics (www.alliedelec.com). Like I said, I cleaned out
> their stock, thinking it might be nice to have a few spares for the
> Mark-8 or my IMSAI. They seemed to indicate they could get more, with
> a 6-8 week lead time, though.
Allied Electronics (a Tandy company for a few years) provided me
with most of the parts I used to build my SOL-PC into a working
system (a few parts from James Electronics and even fewer from
The Outhouse)...
Love 'em!
-dq
I'm getting together parts to build a Mark-8 (using a set of the PC
boards and docs that Steve G has been selling on eBay). I've got
everything but the case either on order or on hand, but I've searched
high and low for about 8 C&K #7108J4ZQE2 black lever-handle toggle
switches with no success. I found the SPDT switches, but I still need
the momentary ones. Any suggestions? Tried Mouser, DigiKey, Jameco,
JDR, Newark, and Allied (which is where I found the first type) as
well as several other smaller parts houses with no luck.
C&K/ITT/Cannon has offered to make me up a couple as samples, but I
need at least 6 and would be more comfortable if I had a couple of
spares.
-Bill Richman (bill_r(a)inetnebr.com)
Web Page: http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bill_r
Home of the COSMAC Elf Microcomputer Simulator, Fun with
Molten Metal, Orphaned Robots, and Technological Oddities.
Contact them directly if interested.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cletus Schertz" <scher002(a)tc.umn.edu>
To: <jrkeys(a)concentric.net>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:43 PM
Subject: Apple IIe computers
> Read an article that you may be wanting old computers. We have two
Apple
> IIe computers. Are they of interest to you??
>
Hello:
I have a problem with a pdp11/24 after I boot the switch my device appears on my console I type DU0 and return but after test the memory 40000000 it test it again and not rt11 software comes in.
Thank for any help Ricardo Tejada
With all this talk of RS/6000s, I've become a little interested in what
these machines can do / are capable of. Is there a hardware FAQ like the
FAQABOSS or Sun Hardware Reference?
--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said.
<kris(a)nospam.catonic.net> | IM: KrisBSD | HSV, AL.
-------------------------------------------------------
"Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chad Fernandez [mailto:fernande@internet1.net]
> Wow, what's it made of depleted Uranium? I can barley carry
> my MicroVax
> 3400 by myself up the stairs. I think your machine is
> bigger, However.
Let's just say I don't intend to move it past the first floor.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'