Hey guys,
I have a second SWTPC 6800 system I got recently and have it all running.
It came with a Gimix 8K PROM board and, thankfully, the manual. It has two
EPROMs installed:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4pq0-BHd2x6R29LVy03d3c4dTA/view?usp=sharin
g
I'm assuming this board is used for things like storing BASIC in ROM, etc.
Based on the manual with DIP switch 7 set it is set to use C000 - if I
wanted to try and init whatever is on those chips, would it be as simple as
J C000 at the SWTBUG prompt?
Many thanks,
Brad
In a message dated 2/19/2017 8:06:50 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
mouse at Rodents-Montreal.ORG writes:
> - PDF/A is [...]
> Those are all good archival properties! However, it's also R/O.
Maybe if you stick to Adobe's tools. As demonstrated by this thread,
it's entirely possible to modify such files, even if the currently-easy
ways to do that involve a trip through a completely different
representation.
I find it astonishing that anyone would seriously call any documented
file format read-only. (If PDF/A isn't documented, then IMO it's not
suitable for archival under any circumstances. But this thread makes
it sound as though it's documented.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse at rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
======================
OK .. (correct me if I am gong in the wrong direction) so the
important thing is that there is...
- data in a format that is readable by others and a description of
formats so if needed a reader can be constructed at a later date if needed.
-non-commercial tools to access it or have the ability to modify the data
in the future for all of time.
-a reader/writer can be redone to work under a new operating system since
source code is freely available for it?
.... yea... makes sense...
I do know what I do in any given week here is not necessary for the
present but for years and sometimes lifetimes far removed from the
present moment.
#Ed _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
Adobe claims " PDF/A ? the ISO standard for long-term archiving"
-I am confused about all the versions etc..
-which are good which are bad?
-are there good programs for opening hesitant to open pdf file?
- what is a good freeware PDF generator? / modifier?
- are older versions of the reader better than the newer ones?
-my HP scanner software makes PDF files eiher as graphics or as graphics
with OCR
-is my HP scanner making "good" pdf files that can be read into the
future?
Sorry if I seem confused on this... but I am!
thanks for any help Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 2/18/2017 11:24:14 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
bobalan at sbcglobal.net writes:
On 2/18/2017 10:04 AM, Paul Birkel wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Al
Kossow
>> Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 12:50 PM
>> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>> Subject: Re: PDP-11/24 CPU later version
>>
>> PDF-A
>>
>> which is the reason it's not on bitsavers
> Thank you Al. It's not just me then who has heartburn with that format
...
>
> ----
>
>
I removed the /A format and put the copy up here:
http://dvq.com/docs/EK-11024-TM-003.pdf
Bob
--
Vintage computers and electronics
www.dvq.comwww.tekmuseum.comwww.decmuseum.org
If you are near Atlanta, there is an immediate opening for someone who knows
terminals and keyboards. Must be able to drive fork lift, climb ladders,
carry 50 pounds, etc. Email me if interested. This is a long term, full
time, good paying job.
Cindy Croxton
If you are near Atlanta, there is an immediate opening for someone who knows
terminals and keyboards. Must be able to drive fork lift, climb ladders,
carry 50 pounds, etc. Email me if interested.
Cindy Croxton
So I was recently provided (thanks!) with a copy of the later rev of the
PDP-11/24 Tech Manual (EK-11024-TM-003), which I have had scanned for a while
now (waiting for a quite period on the list ;-), and is now available for
upload here:
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/EK-11024-TM-003.pdf
(Bitsavers et al, please pick this up and distribute.)
So it has an Appendix D, which described the -YA later rev of the CPU card
(in which a bunch of gates were replaced with a couple of custom gate arrays.
Does anyone have one of these? I'd love to get a photo of one, if so.
Thanks!
Noel
I'm looking at what I suspect is a labeled Harris VOS (Vulcan) tape.
Is it the case that the Harris minis are incapable of writing tape
records that aren't a multiple of 3 bytes in length? The reason I ask
is that the VOL HDR, etc. records all seem to be 81 bytes in length.
All other records on the tape are also a multiple of 3 bytes long.
Anyone remember anything like this? The Bitsavers documents are of no
help as far as I can determine.
--Chuck
> From: Al Kossow
> PDF-A
Sorry, what's the issue with PDF/A?
Since it's supposedly the 'archival' version, that's what I asked for; I
wanted to maximize the lifetime of these things.
What version of PDF should I be asking for? (I'm not doing the PDF'ing. The
person who is is using Acrobat.)
> which is the reason it's not on bitsavers
Are any other of the things I've scanned that aren't up for the same reason?
List here (first two sections):
http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/tech/pdp11/PDP-11_Stuff.html
Please let me know, and I'll get them re-PDF'd into an acceptable form.
Noel
Wow from 2013
> I've put together a small box of old TTL books, computer references
> of all sorts that I simply do not want anymore. If someone really
> wants to collect old databooks instead of me sending this stuff out
> to pulp let me know. It would be easiest if someone local to me here
> in Ottawa could deal with it.
I had a nibble from a local but somehow we never got the move
arranged and it has grown to two smallish boxes now.
I'll throw in DEC books and maybe a few other goodies.
Toronto/Montreal is a possibility too if you can arrange a pickup.
Diane
--
- db at FreeBSD.org db at db.nethttp://www.db.net/~db
Hey folks,
after my OmniUSB-thread has gone down the teleprinter way... I'll start
a new thread.
Did you now how I came to vintage computers? How I became some kind of
computer engineer? Probably not. It's so easy. Listen. Long story ahead.
In 1999 I started to study computer science. Java and algorithms and all
that clean stuff.
One day in autumn 2000 I had that idea: I need a Fernschreiber
(=teleprinter)! I had nothing to do with that stuff. And I did no know
how it worked. I even did not remember having seen one. It was just that
word in my head.
So I bought my first Siemens T100 (still here in the house, two floors
below me). It was a machine with strange connectors which made awful
noise when connected to power.
So I went to the library and found a good book from 1934. That told me
how the teleprinter works.
I then somehow soldered a simple interface to connect that beast to the
parallel (!!!) port of my Linux server (the first hachti.de server was a
mainboard and a harddisk in the corner of my student home where we had
10mbit LAN acess and fixed IP. I even did a DNS reverse mapping
philipp.vorstrasse.uni-bremen.de for my IP).
At that time all about programming I knew was Turbo Pascal, some Z80
machine language (not assembly language, I programmed that beast in hex)
and a bit Java. I didn't even know much about Linux. The server back
then had been setup by someone else who was in need of a server. So he
used it as well.
I used the parallel port because I had an idea how to control the pins.
I knew that there was something ugly called serial port but I had not
yet made the connection that this was EXACTLY what I would have needed.
To program that thing I needed some software. So I went to the bookstore
at noon. Will never forget that. Bought the O'Reilly Linux Kernel
drivers book (the one with the horse) and started to write my first C
program ever. It was a kernel module. The Kernel must have been Linux
2.2. It was frustrating. But after a decent 30 hour nonstop session and
hundreds of reboots (haha, of my web and mail server which was also
running X from time to time) I really had some bitbang code which made
the teleprinter say what I wanted it to say.
I soon realised that with a multitasking OS like Linux I had the choice
of outputting correct data using busy wait in Kernel or outputting a
mess when the system gets under load. So I learned THAT lesson.
I decided that I needed something else. Because I had heard of other
people working with something called PIC Microcontroller, I bought one
and a programmer. And a breadboard. That evil 16f84 was sitting there on
my desk, naked, and did - nothing.
Getting the PIC up and running was pure horror. The hardest architecture
I've ever mastered. Since then I know: PIC is a load of complete shit!
In the end I failed to create a RS232 (had learned that in the meantime)
to teleprinter converter but had the idea to hook up two teleprinters
using modems. TelexPhone was born. The project (telexphone.net) was
eventually kind of stolen a few years later and continued to something
still in existence called i-telex over internet. That was never what I
wanted because the V21 modems (hard to find!!) are bit transparent. That
means that the teleprinters on both sides of the wire run as synchronous
as with a real wire between them. Very cool. The TelexPhone used a
16f876 with a approx 2k cooperative multitasking system written entirely
in assembly. It was somehow modular. I managed to hook in modules with
private main loop and init parts by writing an impressive linker script
which automated that.
Hey, I was 21 and did all that on my own! Please do NOT laugh!
In the meantime someone somewhere invented something called eBay. And
because It's always good to have several different devices of the same
type and even better to have several examples of each those different
devices, I had an eBay search for "Lochstreifen" which means punched
paper tape. Paper tape for teleprinter, of course.
One day I found an offer "Honeywell H316 minicomputer" which sounded
interesting. With paper tape. And no pictures. In Switzerland. A quick
search (probably already google? I used altavista.digital.com before)
told me that this could be an interesting toy. So I bought it for the
incredible amount of SFr 450.
Borrowed a car and went there. What I found was some messy stuff
somewhere on an uninsulated attic in Switzerland. Very dirty. I nearly
turned down the deal because it all looked so crappy. The seller
admitted that he had kept the stuff in that open attic since beginning
of the 1980s.
I took it home. Had to drive TWICE from Bremen to Switzerland to get it
all. And it was a lucky buy.
After fiddling and cleaning around some weeks (never seen a minicomputer
before!) and reading the manuals, I found out that the PSU had a slight
problem which lead to unjustified shutdown. After I had solved that by
pulling out one of the security circuit card from the PSU, it powered up
the computer. And it magically worked instantly exactly as the manual
told me. That was in 2004. The H316 has never since then failed a single
time. Only issue are some contact issues with some memory cabling which
may happen after moving the machine.
Since then I have never had to switch a chip or a lamp or whatever. No
single failure. Not one failed CPU or memory test (except when I stress
the cable's card edge connector). It's so amazing that it became boring.
Programming in FORTRAN IV? Read the manual, punch tape, use the
compiler, linking loader and libraries as described in the manual -
works. No secret shit. And The machine came with all that software as
nice source code listing and binary paper tapes.
While still wandering around on my Olympus of quality, I got a call by a
teleprinter friend who asked me if I would take a pdp8 computer. I
thought that bit of that infamous DEC mess could be a good counter
example for my H316's unlimited quality and went to pick up the pdp8.
The day ended with my yellow car completely stuffed with rusty pdp8/l,
and lots of other stuff. It were three machines. The tape drives and
racks were fubar and went to scrap.
http://pdp8.hachti.de/gallery/haul/dscn0750_full.jpghttp://pdp8.hachti.de/gallery/haul/dscn0751_full.jpghttp://pdp8.hachti.de/gallery/haul/dscn2109_full.jpg
That was the beginning of the end. It just happened. Later 8/e, lab8/e etc.
And I had to admit that playing with Omnibus pdp8 is absolutely amazing!
It's a great toy! I think the pdp8/e (not straight-8, 8/i, /s or
whatever) is one of the greatest toys ever made. There are many games,
it breaks regularly while still giving you a chance to be satisfied
after fixing it. And it's so versatile!
And digging through those blurry schematics is a game in its own right!
For the Honeywell everything comes in high quality print, completely
correct, no derivations and workarounds. With DEC it can be an adventure
to get an overview over a hardware, its features, ECOs and FCOs and what
else could happen.
Someday I also made a pdp8 in an FPGA. That was during the time I wanted
to be a chip designer. But the only place where I could to ASIC design
(I did my diploma thesis about a video generator FPGA design) was closed
down instead of hiring me. Thank you, Silicon Image!
Currently I'm working for a Bosch/Denso joint venture doing Linux
security for car multimedia systems. In my free time I have just started
to construct a M?rklin model railroad digital decoder which I will try
to sell commercially (the competition use closed source PIC stuff. I use
GPLv3 AVR code). And I run a letterpress print shop with the biggest
machine being over 5 metric tons.
In the printshop there's also an 8/e. And I have inherited a forklift.
Don't know why I wrote this... Just wanted to write it. The teleprinter
discussion... It was the teleprinter discussion....
I never learned to get that paper... I just had the right toys.
That's it for now :-)
Sorry I don't recall his name, but wondering what the progress is on the
11/70 version of this. Raspberry pi, functional front panel with
blink'n lights which functions like the 11/70.
My back archives are in a bit of a scramble, so can't search it either,
again apologies.
thanks
Jim
My B&L Stereozoom microscope didn't have any protection for the
objective lens assembly. It uses a rather oddball 38 mm threaded mount.
I thought that those with the same scope might be interested in the
adapter being sold as eBay 401250097157. It fits the 38mm thread on
the B&L perfoectly and adapts it to a standard 52mm filter thread.
Cheap--less that $3 shipped. Just got it today and it fits like a glove.
FWIW
--Chuck
________________________________________
From: cctalk [cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] on behalf of cctalk-request at classiccmp.org [cctalk-request at classiccmp.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 9:31 AM
To: bill.gunshannon at hotmail.com
Subject: confirm e3191f334ef584df40dccf9737f54f4dcd016a5d
______________________________________________
There was some talk a short time ago about accounts being shutdown because
of excessive bounces. Well, a couple days ago I got one of these messages.
I have not stopped receiving messages from the list. I think there is a problem
with the mailing list software. :-)
bill
Anybody interested in a copy of:
Communications Options Minireference Manual (EK-CMINI-RM-001)
USPS Flat Rate would be under $15.00 Throw in a couple more fo the trouble of
taking to the PO and it's yours.
bill
Don't laugh
http://w2hx.com/x/New%20Shack/0224151752b.jpg
________________________________
From: ben <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
Sent: Feb 14, 2017 1:54 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: New batch of pdp8 OMNIBUS to USB interface! Please Read and react!
On 2/14/2017 6:27 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> FWIW, Mini-B connectors are on their way out, nor USB OTG compliant.
> Though agreed that they are flimsy... Why not just a type A or
> something? Easy, big, and robust.
>
Why not mini and regular?
Ben.
PS: Add a 45.5 baud serail port. Control everything with a 5 level TTY. :)
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Tony Duell <ard.p850ug1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think at one time radio amateurs (at least over here) had to use 5 bit
> ITA2
> machines for RTTY.
Same here.
> It may even be to this day that RTTY implies that, and
> that ASCII is classed as 'data'.
The FCC order authorizing Amateur Radio use of ASCII went into effect in
March of 1980, but at the moment I can't track down a copy of the actual
order. The current FCC regs (?97.309) are more recent, and lump RTTY and
"data emission" together, allowing ITA2, AMTOR, or ASCII, or, with
additional limitations, "an unspecified digital code". I suppose I could
use EBCDIC, FIELDATA, or the IBM Stretch character code, as long as I
didn't use it for the purpose of obscuring the meaning of the
communications, or to communicate with a station in a country with which
the US doesn't have an agreement allowing those codes to be used.
But the 5 level machines that were used over
> here tend to be Creeds (Creed 7s, 75s and 444s mostly).
>
I'm told that Teletype models 15, 19, and 28 were very common here. I've
mostly seen models 15 and 28. I've only once seen a mdoel 32 (ITA2
five-level version of model 33).
I've seen some Kleinschmidt teleprinters, but I've never seen a Creed.
Hi,
Phil emailed me out of the blue -- I'm not interested but anyone on the
list want his 029 keypunch in Ohio?
--Toby
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Fwd: ibm 29
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:25:44 -0500
From: Phil Masturzo <pmasturzo at neo.rr.com>
To: toby at telegraphics.com.au
My name is PHiL and I live in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio. I got your email
>from a computer museum who thought you may be interested in purchasing
my IBM 29 computer. If so, email me back or call me on my cell
phone at xxx-xxx-xxxx, if I can answer any questions you may have.
Thanks,
Phil
They are really neat looking! Phillipp!
http://www.radista.info/tt_units/teleprinter_T-68d.jpg
Yes I like the colors! what is the weight!
Anyone heading to western US with large suitcase soon? (grin!)
Another one our favorite sortta cute teletypes we like here at the SMECC
museum is the model 31. we are looking to get all possible variants of this
machine.
We have some interesting stuff at this link here
http://web.archive.org/web/20170103075925/http://www.smecc.org/teletype_mode
l_31.htm
And... we are interested in more of them, any photos of them or scans of
them in various uses to continue to build this section out. Please drop us
a line offlist at couryhouse at aol.com
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 2/15/2017 11:22:51 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
hachti at hachti.de writes:
Hi,
On 02/15/2017 03:16 PM, COURYHOUSE at aol.com wrote:
> there are one of the Siemens teletypes that print tape and has a
dial
> on the front from Germany I have seen very compact nice unit used
for
> telex I would love to have.
It's the t68d. Exists in very different versions. With paper tape,
without, with dial, black, brown, etc.
I have a few of those.
I even have one sitting in Morocco. I brought it there by car...
Always good to review what the terms of each is. Newcomers may not
understand completely.
Same with photo usage and video and music usage - there are various
terms of usage for these media types.
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 2/15/2017 9:13:36 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
hachti at hachti.de writes:
One should also be aware of the difference between public domain, open
source, free software and the different license models and have an
understanding of the applicable rights and obligations.
Kind regards
Philipp
there are one of the Siemens teletypes that print tape and has a dial
on the front from Germany I have seen very compact nice unit used for
telex I would love to have. shipping on teletypes from overseas is
expensive though.
If one was local ad inn really nice shape we would be a candidate fro
it for the telecom display at SMECC.
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 2/15/2017 7:12:47 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
hachti at hachti.de writes:
>> I could swap something for a nice creed machine.
>
> I suspect they're more common in the UK than elsewhere. They were used
> by the Post Office
> for the Telex service, for example.
I know. Here everything is full with Siemens and Lorenz.
Je aussi voudrais avoir une machine de Sagem...!
> are wondering). Obviously these machines are normally 'collection
> only' the sellers will not ship
That's the main problem :-(
But teletypes are easier to find here than in US :-P :-P :-P
From: william degnan <billdegnan at gmail.com>
> that's fine, but the reasoning was totally political and narrow minded.
I'd be fascinated at a justification for this opinion that squared
with "John C. Calhoun?s legacy as a white supremacist and a national
leader who passionately promoted slavery as a ?positive good?".
On Wed, 2/15/17, jim stephens <jwsmail at jwsss.com> wrote:
> I saw her speak twice...
I got to hear her speak once when I was a freshman in
college before I really knew much about who she was.
Yet there were still several things she said that have stuck
with me ever since.? Years later I was talking with a retired
Navy admiral that I worked with and if I remember correctly
how he put it, Hopper was the only person Nimitz was ever
scared of.
>? But she had only brought a couple of "nanoseconds" and so I
> missed a chance to snag one.
Alas, I never got one of her nanoseconds either.? But I
still love telling my students the story about them.
> Very nice lady.
>From everything I've heard she was indeed, in addition to
being a force of nature. Always wished I had gotten a
chance to meet her.
BLS
Indeed! It is fun to learn what got people interested in the
history... and their
replies are in some cases interesting history itself!
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 2/15/2017 10:03:05 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
nf6x at nf6x.net writes:
Thanks for sharing. That was a delightful origin story.
--
Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net>
http://www.nf6x.net/
> From: Toby Thain
> Even if your argument weren't absurd and offensive
Absurd and offensive is in the eye of the beholder. Can we please drop
this topic? Thanks.
Noel
Personally, i don't care about lead free solder. I am quite happy with lead. Is there a rohs requirement for small production, non profit, prototyping project?
________________________________
From: Philipp Hachtmann <hachti at hachti.de>
Sent: Feb 14, 2017 11:54 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: New batch of pdp8 OMNIBUS to USB interface! Please Read and react!
Hi,
> I'm interested. How much did a board from the previous batch cost?
Was different. I first made a poll and sold a batch of boards in my
online shop for a certain price. It was somewhere about 105 EUR without VAT.
After I received the payment, I made the boards and delivered them (I
announced exactly that procedere!!).
Later, as a few boards were left, I increased the price up to nearly EUR
200. I did it like with kickstarter - the people who trusted and funded
got it cheaper. The whole thing barely covered the costs btw.
> And
> will that be any indication of what the new boards price?
No, not really. But I already have some rough idea.
The board will most probably be full size again. Reducing the size does
seems not to offer enough benefit with respect to the hassle of adding
enlargement afterwards.
After my poll it looks as if there will be the following options:
- Kit with full size board and SMT already soldered RoHS compliant.
This will most probably go for short under EUR 100 (without VAT where it
applies).
I have to check with the assembly house. This time I try not to sit
there and solder lead free SMD by hand for days. I like soldering SMT
but that lead-free stuff and masses of boards can get quite annoying.
The last boards were all hand soldered by me.
One problem could be the gold fingers: My usual board house finally
realized that their calculation tool was plain wrong when it charged me
extra EUR 1,50 per board for the hard gold fingers.
The board will be like the old ones but:
* some unused (upper bit) IC positions removed
* The diode stuff moved away from the edge (that was so stupid, sorry!)
* The USB connector will be moved away from the edge, I will think about
some holes to fix the cable using a strap. The USB will become mini USB.
- Wonderful handle/set of handles to attach to the board. Probably made
of milled wood, still thinking about it.
This will be extremely expensive, I have no idea yet. Perhaps EUR 30 per
"one piece" or set.
And if someone really insists, I will manually complete and test a
board. That would add another EUR 65 to the game. And perhaps an USB cable.
If I continue to sell boards in that way, it will take not even 5 more
years until it has paid for my Eagle 6 and 7 licenses..
Please continue to add to the doodle "calendar", if you are interested.
Kind regards,
Philipp
I have not heard of 40 mil loop here on ttys... generally 20 mil or
60 mil. - At least what I have encountered. Is the 40 mil. standard in
Europe?
Ed# _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org)
In a message dated 2/14/2017 2:24:15 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
hachti at hachti.de writes:
On 14.02.2017 22:18, geneb wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, ben wrote:
>
>> On 2/14/2017 6:27 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>>> FWIW, Mini-B connectors are on their way out, nor USB OTG compliant.
>>> Though agreed that they are flimsy... Why not just a type A or
>>> something? Easy, big, and robust.
>>>
>> Why not mini and regular?
>> Ben.
>> PS: Add a 45.5 baud serail port. Control everything with a 5 level
>> TTY. :)
>
> Dirty casual. 20mA current loop or nothing.
The 45 baud machines do NOT run on 20mA. They usually run on 40mA :-)
20mA is the domain of model 28, 32, 33 etc.
> From: Josh Dersch
> Sorry, typo.
Ah, no wonder I couldn't find it... :-)
The memory card (?) - the hex board leaning up against the wall in the middle
- does look a lot like the MS95 memory card from the manual (three horizontal
DuPont headers at the top, two vertical ones at the bottom, etc) but it also
has differences - it doesn't have the two large square chips, etc. (And
there's an MS95 in the board list, IIRC.)
None of the other boards seem to correspond to anything in the QED 95 manual,
though. So, rather a mystery. Quickware Engineering does still have a Web
page (http://quickware.com/) which says that "Our core business is providing
custom PDP-11 processor emulator upgrades", but it contains little content.
Noel
Does anyone know what the QED board (4th image) in this eBay lot:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/322414100718
is? The large chip looks like a J11 chip. However, the only QED PDP-11 board
I found mention of online is a high-performance hex board UNIBUS processor,
the QED 95.
Noel
Perhaps a silly question but have you poked around local social media for a local unix group? Or a local craigslist ad for someone to borrow a key? I wouldn't think they'd be thst uncommon although admittedly I also stopped/paused a project for similar lack of results a while back (much different system though).
> From: Tony Duell
> Having other hardware decode instructions that appear as NOPs to the
> main processor is not uncommon in HP machines.
Ah, so you actually had some prior knowledge that helped in working out that
puzzle, that that's what's happening here! :-)
Noel
Its literally Christmas for me today.
I came into physical position of a well optioned-out SPARCserver 1000e,
accompanied by several SPARC Storage Arrays.
I'm doing a physical review of the 1000e, i.e. re-seating boards, physical clean
up, etc. And reviewing all the appropriate hardware documentation, still
available, directly from Oracle.
Anyway, on the front of the case is a (4) position power switch (i.e. standby,
on, DIAG, lock), that is unfortunately not set to the on position.
Hoping that someone out there either has a key that they will part with, or,
knows of another (presumably Sun) key that will work in the 1000e key switch.
Thanks for looking,
Jerry @ 75077
Hi CC folks:
Been trying for several years now to find the vital parts I need to
get a Nova 3/12 from my old Univ. up & running. What I do have now is
the chassis with PS, front panel, CPU and FPU boards, some of the
documentation, and, hopefully pending, a disc drive (not sure if it
has controller). Most of all, of course, we badly need Mag or MOS
memory, plus I/O boards/peripherals. Have posted on "vintage
computers" several times and also contacted a DG specialist but so far
no success with parts. ANY help in getting this thing going before,
at pushing 70, I get too old to ever see it run even a simple routine
or ancient game, (or care !) would be very deeply appreciated!!
Please eMail: firesweep "at" verizon "dot" net if you can help or have leads!
regards,
Roger A. in NY
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Philipp Hachtmann <hachti at hachti.de> wrote:
>>> PS: Add a 45.5 baud serail port. Control everything with a 5 level
>>> TTY. :)
>>
>> Dirty casual. 20mA current loop or nothing.
>
> The 45 baud machines do NOT run on 20mA. They usually run on 40mA :-)
The M19 is 60mA at 100VDC... takes a bit to pull that relay.
> 20mA is the domain of model 28, 32, 33 etc.
Yep. That's all I have in my own pile... (33 and 35).
-ethan
> From: Tony Duell
> Personally I _do_ care about lead free solder. I won't have it. The
> fact that part of this board comes pre-assembled with that horrible
> muck means I won't even consider buying one.
Gee, Tony, why don't you tell us what you _really_ think! :-)
Noel
Hi there,
I've got a couple of DEC QBUS boards (including a quad SLU) for which
configuration is set by wire-wrap jumpers. I don't have a wire-wrap tool,
and have found that trying this by hand without one is not workable.
Has anyone come up with a clever way to permit reconfiguration of these
boards without semi-permanent changes? Or, alternatively, what wire-wrap
tool would you recommend?
Thanks!
- Earl
That is a very nice and robust part you linked to. Looks perfect
________________________________
From: Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com>
Sent: Feb 14, 2017 10:03 AM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: New batch of pdp8 OMNIBUS to USB interface! Please Read and react!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt <ams at gnu.org> wrote:
> FWIW, Mini-B connectors are on their way out, nor USB OTG compliant.
> Though agreed that they are flimsy... Why not just a type A or
> something? Easy, big, and robust.
This is a peripheral. USB OTG doesn't apply, and USB-A would be
"inappropriate". Pretend this is an inkjet printer. What plug would
you expect to find on that?
I don't _mind_ Mini (I have a number of devices and cables that are
mini) and it _is_ more robust than Micro (I have seen plenty of phones
and tablets with broken micro plugs).
I have a suggestion... put 4 vias on 0.1" spacing next to the micro
connector so we could, for example, add a chassis-friendly exit cable
of our own purchase/manufacture if we choose, to have a nice fat USB-B
on the outside of the case.
https://newnex.com/images/UHR1-B-0005Blarge.jpg
-ethan
AT&T 3B2 Computer UNIX System V User Reference Manual
Original red hardcover, 3-ring binder, 9"x9"x2" Published July 1985
Excellent condition, never used
Best offer plus $10 for shipping.
Tony Duell wrote:
> My first thought, and it's probably wrong, is that these instrucitons
> (which differ by one bit, so might be
> setting/reseting something) are NOPs to the CPU, but are interpretted
> by the memory mapping hardware in those
> 9825s that have more than 64K or RAM and ROM total.
This seems likely. According to your schematics, gate U47 detects the pattern 0701xx. This signal feeds into the U43c flipflop, which appears to latch the state of the low 4 bits of the MAD bus into register U42, which sets the state of the /ForceRAM (bit 3), /ForceROM (bit 2), /DiagRd (bit 1) and ALLROM (bit 0) signals. Thus, these two instructions appear to toggle the state of the /ForceROM signal.
If I?ve wrapped my brain around the details it appears that 070113 deasserts the /ForceROM signal, and 070117 asserts it?
I agree quite a unique bit of code
On Feb 13, 2017 4:07 PM, "Noel Chiappa" <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
> From: Tony Duell
> My first thought, and it's probably wrong
Apparently not... :-)
> these instrucitons (which differ by one bit, so might be
> setting/reseting something) are NOPs to the CPU, but are interpretted
> by the memory mapping hardware
Ooh, very clever/cool.
Noel
> From: Josh Dersch
> (while installing the MMU and Stack Limit Register in my own 11/40)
BTW, I think I found out why the MMU requires the SLR. The SLR is not
operative in User mode. I haven't checked out the circuitry to see exactly
what the interaction is, but it has to be something associated with that.
> you *will* need an LTC to run V6 UNIX
Actually, it will work with a KW11-P, too; those are actually more commmon
than the KW11-L's, I've found. But as Guy pointed out, the DL11-W will do too
- and those are _very_ common (since they were used in the 11/34's, etc).
Noel
> From: Tony Duell
> My first thought, and it's probably wrong
Apparently not... :-)
> these instrucitons (which differ by one bit, so might be
> setting/reseting something) are NOPs to the CPU, but are interpretted
> by the memory mapping hardware
Ooh, very clever/cool.
Noel
Looking for a DATAC 1000 if anyone has one for sale or trade (or a site
with pictures). This is a Philadelphia USA origin 6502 trainer. I am
interested in it for the local history.
Thanks
Bill
> From: William Degnan
> PDP 11 KE11E M7238 EIS board (for PDP 11/40) which causes the CPU to
> crash when installed; front panel not responsive
> ...
> I installed a removable jumper so I can flip jumper configs back and
> forth between EIS installed/not installed. Without the EIS the system
> works fine
To understand this symptom, one needs to understand how the EIS interacts
with the main CPU. Both include microcode, and what is supposed to happen is
that when an EIS instruction happens, control is passed to the microcode on
the EIS board (the actual microcode words being fed back to the main CPU
through those three over-the-back jumper cables). The microcode on the EIS
board can then control the data paths, etc in the main CPU, to feed the EIS
data, and take back the results of the computation performed on the EIS card.
I'm trying to understand what W1 does, but I'm not there yet. It's shown on
the KD11-A print K3-8 (pg. 48), in the lower left corner, but its effects are
somewhat obscure.
To start with, the array of odd chips E6-E7 (74H60's) and E17 (74H53) are
expandable AND-OR gates. I'd never seen these before, but the lines running
to and from pins 11 and 12 on the 'H53 join the other three gates below it
into it - i.e. that whole array of AND gates all feed into one NOR gate
(output on pin 8 of the 'H53).
So far, so good, but from there I'm still lost. When W1 is inserted (no EIS)
it grounds the signal ECIN00, which comes in from off-board (as shown by the
"A05S2", which is the pin it arrives on). The output of that giant NOR gate
is CIN00, which is immediately sent off-board (pin 'A05P1'). I have yet to
try and chase these signals down, and work out what they do; the KD11-A Tech
Manual is fairly cryptic on the subject.
Note also that, IIRC, the front console operates under control of microcode.
So I'm _guessing_ that what is happening is that somehow the EIS is, when
enabled, messing up the operation of the microcode in the main CPU, causing
it to freeze.
> Thought - I don't have a LW11L, M787 installed. ... Do you think that
> maybe the EIS board requires this for some reason
No. I've looked at the KW11-L prints in the past, and it's just a very simple
UNIBUS device. I don't see any way it not being there could cause the
symptoms under discussion.
> I could swap out the current 11/40 backplane with a backplane that has
> the jumpers for the M787 already removed
I think it's only one jumper - for BG6, no?
> I neglected to mention I had no M787
To run Unix V6 you'll need either a KW11-L or KW11-P (see previous
discussion about how Unix needs a clock - both at a low level, because
it will panic() if it doesn't find one, and at a high level, because
even if we patch the panic, stuff won't 'work right' without one).
Noel
Question - I am working on a PDP 11 KE11E M7238 EIS board (for PDP 11/40)
which causes the CPU to crash when installed; front panel not responsive,
can't boot XXDP. I installed a removable jumper so I can flip jumper
configs back and forth between EIS installed/not installed. Without the
EIS the system works fine, can boot OS's that do not require it like RT11.
As discussed before the EIS is required if I want to boot up UNIX 6 on the
11/40, which is a goal of mine.
Thought - I don't have a LW11L, M787 installed. This is a the Line TIme
Clock option card. Do you think that maybe the EIS board requires this for
some reason, even though there are no references to this as a requirement
in any docs I can find? Maybe the docs writers assume it's installed? I
only wonder because any time I have seen the M7238 installed in an 11/40 I
have also seen a M787.
I could swap out the current 11/40 backplane with a backplane that has the
jumpers for the M787 already removed, but I only want to do this if it's
necessary. When we were talking before I neglected to mention I had no
M787, you may have assumed I did.
Bill