Does anyone have a list of the IOT instructions (and what they do) for
the TD8E simple dectape controller?
--
Christopher L McNabb
Operating Systems Analyst Email: cmcnabb(a)4mcnabb.net
Virginia Tech ICBM: 37.1356N 80.4272N
GMRS: WPSR255 ARS: N2UX Grid Sq: EM97SD
On Dec 9, 0:06, Tony Duell wrote:
> > > and squeeze handle. This snips and crimps over one lead at a time by
> > > hand-power. When done "loose" components is secure and ready for
> > > soldering process. Looks like pistol style.
> > >
> > > Where can I find THAT tool and what it is called?
> >
> > Variously known as a "cut and clench" tool or "cut and squeeze" pliers.
> > Prices for basic pressed steel versions are as low as ten pounds.
>
> They have various alternative names, which can't be used on a 'family'
> mailing list like this one. Such names are used by the poor hackers who
> have to remove the components again :-)
Particularly the type that squeeze the component lead to make it twice as
thick :-)
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> [2] The user types in the string and presses Submit, and it runs the CGI
>
> ...
>
> Now the script generates a page with the real email address as a mailto
> hyperlink. The user may bookmark this page if he/she wishes.
Why expose the address at all? How about you send the (plain text only)
note on to the addressee w/o disclosing the address. If the recipient
wants the sender to know their address, they'll respond to them.
The same script could be used if there are any pages on the classiccmp
web site where a user could/should have an opportunity to send mail,
e.g. to the site maintainer, members listed as contacts or resources
for system XYZ, etc.
Just a thought,
--Steve.
On Dec 8, 17:05, jpero(a)sympatico.ca wrote:
> I once saw on factory electronics assembly tape, a assembler held say
> large cap with untrimmed legs thru circuit board and inserts the
> tool's barrel down that wire w/ barrel end snug against circuit board
> and squeeze handle. This snips and crimps over one lead at a time by
> hand-power. When done "loose" components is secure and ready for
> soldering process. Looks like pistol style.
>
> Where can I find THAT tool and what it is called?
Variously known as a "cut and clench" tool or "cut and squeeze" pliers.
Prices for basic pressed steel versions are as low as ten pounds.
Take a look at Farnell's website, www.farnell.com, and look up catalogue
numbers 147-210 (low cost cut-and-squeeze) and 441-077 (form and crop,
pistol style -- a mere UKP55).
> Oh, don't a tool exists to unbend those bent over leads while melting
> solder with normal solder iron at same time?
My Weller soldering gun came with a tool with aluminium ends, one end
forked to grab component leads while the solder is molten. It wouldn't be
hard to make one (but don't make the whole body out of aluminium or you'll
burn your fingers!).
Farnell 145-462 is similar, but not (IMHO) as good as my Weller one.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Anyone know how to contact the RICM. I need to tell them to change their
web links to the CCC. The webmaster email address bounces - mailbox full!
-- hbp
The only strippers I've ever found that worked
well on wire wrap were those ones that looked like
small pliers and had white plastic shells that would
guide the wire onto stripper blades. I'm not sure who
sells these as they were units I picked up at a surplus
store.
-----
Clauss NO-NIK
they show up on eBay from time to time, sometimes listed
as fibre optic strippers.
Under the "It never hurts to ask" heading:
Anybody want to trade a >>>working<<< commodore SX-64
for the working commodore 64+working 1541+ I'll even throw in the
$19.00 from kmart TV I bought for it?
Last summer, I was at a big ham radio swapmeet in Flagstaff, AZ. There
were two of these printers floating around, which, due to size, got
dumpstered because nobody would take them... we didn't have room even for
one.. and they aren't all that rare anyway.
I saved the ribbons out of them, two that were mounted and one (still
in it's plastic bag) that was spare in one of the machines.
Then I put them in one of the boxed of jun^H^H^H Stuff that I brought
back and promptly forgot about them, until the discussion currently
running reminded me. SO:
Free to someone who *needs* them, you pay USPS priority mail shipping.
Two have been used and might probably need re-inking, one is NOS.
E-mail me OFF LIST please... first come - first served, and hopefully
these should go to someone who is actively using (or restoring for use)
one of these printers and can't find ribbons for it.
Cheers and Merry Newtonsmas
Santa
On Friday, December 6, 2002, John A. Dundas III wrote:
>> Printronix P6000 ~400lpm line printer (biiig data center cabinet .. dot
>> matrix, circa-1985)
>
> I could be wrong, but I think that's a P600. The 600 lpm version of the
> P300 (otherwise identical). I broke my back (literally) on one of these.
My local university surplus in Oklahoma has a P300 on sale for $20. It's in
decent but dusty condition, and one of the casters is borken. I'd buy it,
but I'm (still) short on cash, and I already have a big drum printer that
beats the P300 in cool factor. (It's not made by 'Data Products Corp.' but
instead by 'Data Printer Corp.').
They also have two NeXT laser printers, but they're priced at $50 each. I
think that's a little too high.
--
Jeffrey Sharp
Also note that while at the Montagar site you ask for two different requests
>from a pulldown menu - VMS and Layered products. The Montagar people also
told me that the hobbyist CD issue with 7.3-1 is coming soon. Currently the
web site says they are out of VAX 7.2 CDs, thus my original post. Also note
that a few third party vendors have joined the program, and you can get
hobbyist licenses from them also. Even though it says DECUS number on the
hobbyist PAK site, you can also use your Encompass US Associate number. Note
that Encompass is the HP user group, and that Associate membership is free.
There is a slightly confusing point - Encompass associate membership does not
get you restricted Encompass web site access, so you will NOT be e-mailed a
password, just your Encompass number. So once you have that, proceed to the
Montagar site.
The Montagar process is efficient; your PAKs are emailed within 15 minutes.
The VMS fans on this list should see, for example,
http://www.process.com/openvms/index.html
Process Software has a hobbyist license for some of their products. They
bought up MuiltiNet from TGV. I always though TGV was one of the better
TCP/IP's for VMS. For today's trivia, TGV was an acronym for Two Guys and a
VAX.
Thanks to some help from list member Antonio Carlini, I am now up with VMS
and Multinet, NFS, C and a few other items on a VAXstation 4000-90.
"Jeffrey H. Ingber" <jingber(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> I've been looking at these controllers on and off for awhile. What
> advantages do these have over a Central Point Option Board?
They're documented (at least, Jens was willing to send me a copy of
the programming info when I asked), they're supported by open-source
software, and you can buy new ones without having to wait for one to
turn up on eBay or sifting through a vast pile of PC junk looking for
one.
-Frank McConnell
Unsollicited Commercial E-mail.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:foo@siconic.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 9:47 AM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: AN/ UYK-20X(V)
>
>
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, shirin wrote:
>
> > I have 9 brand new AN/ UYK-20X(V) in stock. Any one interested?
> > Original package plus all accessories.
> > Regards,
> > Shirin
> > Tel: 604- 5522598
>
> What the heck is this?
>
> Sellam Ismail Vintage
> Computer Festival
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> International Man of Intrigue and Danger
> http://www.vintage.org
>
> * Old computing resources for business and academia at
www.VintageTech.com *
> > I think you want _TRS-80 Disk and Other Mysteries_. That was one of
> > the Mysteries books I didn't have, but ISTR that Al turned up a copy
> > recently.
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Tim Mann wrote:
> No, that only covers Model I TRSDOS 2.x and NEWDOS 2.1. Sellam asked
> about TRSDOS 1.3, which I have to assume means Model III TRSDOS.
Fred Cisin wrote:
> True.
> But before we deal with the parameters (MOSTLY minor) that differ, he
> needs a tutorial on how the directory structure works for that family
> of operating systems. Pennington's book provides a good one, unless
> and until one of us has an opportunity to sit down with him and go
> through the details.
Granted, Pennington's book is a good place to start, even though it
doesn't cover the differences in Model III TRSDOS. It doesn't help
Sellam much, though, if he doesn't have a copy.
In my other reply, I gave a pointer to the on-line Programmer's Guide to
TRSDOS/LS-DOS Version 6. Here it is again:
http://www.tim-mann.org/trs80/doc/prgguide.pdf Although the Guide is
denser and not nearly as fun to read as Pennington's book, it contains
the same information (and more) and has the advantage of already being
on-line. It also has the same drawback, namely that it doesn't cover
the differences in Model III TRSDOS.
> For example, for READING files, he doesn't need to know all of the
> details of the H.I.T., but I'm sure that he would appreciate learning
> it ANYWAY, and he will need it sometime in the future when he wants
> to WRITE files.
Does Model III TRSDOS compute the HIT codes the same way as the other
TRSDOS-like systems? I don't recall. Since Radio Shack randomly
changed so many other things (sectors starting at 1 instead of 0, not
having directory entries for the system files, swapping the DAMs,
changing directory entries from 32 to 48 bytes, various smaller
details), it wouldn't be surprising.
--
Tim Mann tim(a)tim-mann.org http://www.tim-mann.org/
Finally (and I mean it, been trying to get to this one for over a year)
dug into an H-88 (H-89? WTD?) that had seen better days (but had this real
nice engraved metal name plate reading "HAL") <G>, and where one might
expect to find the cassette interface board, I instead found a board with
an AY-3-8910 sound generator and MSM5832NS clock chip along with some
other bits.
Kinda neat. Etched on the board is the legend:
Albrektson
Sound/Clock H-89
Now, while these chips are familiar enough... Has anyone else run across
this board and/or have any software for it? Be curious to see what kind
of fun can be had after I get some signs of life out of the machine again.
THanks;
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
> The way I had thunk it, it would need to be both unique and
> reversable.
Nope, don't need to. When you add an email address to the database,
calculate the MD5 hash and store that with it. Make sure you've got
indices on the table for both the hash and the address. When some
user uses the form you get the hash back as an argument, form field,
whatever. Look it up in the table and you get the cleartext address.
Remember the goal is to never put the sensitive data - in this case
the email address - where someone browsing the website can get it.
> It's not. I have jack-asses posting spam to my VCF BBS and
> through my feedback form occasionally.
Good point, Sellam. So make the send/confirmation step include the
bit where the sender has to input some value from a graphic. Seems
like enough to exclude the scripts, provided you're careful about
the filenames of images, etc. Remember, you can have another
database table that relates the gibberish name of these graphics to
the text the sender is suppose to enter.
This is starting to sound like a fun little project...
--S.
Hello all,
I just changed jobs, and the new place has a *TOTAL* lockdown on web
browsing, even for the engineers, so I have not been keeping track of the
list.
I was catching up tonight from home, and saw Adrian's note about me and the
MPF-1. I indeed have one, with manuals, and would be happy to make copies
for whoever needs them. Please email me off-list, and we can set it up.
One small caveat: I have a metric crapload of things going on, so it may be
a few *weeks* before I can get to it. If you can wait, I can make copies...
:-)
Rich B.
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
At 11:25 4-12-2002 -0800, you wrote:
>I'm trying to pull some old word processor and perhaps spreadsheet files
>off some TRSDOS disks using a PC. I already found a utility called
>READDISK that reads TRS-80 disks on a PC and it worked great. Now I need
>to extract the files from the image.
Wouldn't it be easier to install a trs-80 emulator, mount the readdisk
image in it, and print the files to a virtual printer port that you capture
to a pc file?
Kees.
Eric, I saw your post about the chips on ebay, and your right... the seller
(me) didn't know you could get a working cpu board for $25. The only prices
I could find on these chips online were from retailers and they listed them
much higher. So I took a chance at $55. I value your opinion and that of
others on the forum. Thank you for setting me straight. Do you know of a
source that might help me with pricing? I have thousands of Dec and Vax
boards and lots of other stuff that I would like to sell, but fair pricing
is tough. I have been told by other buyers that my prices for items sold to
them has been great. For instance, I sold a complete working Decmate III on
ebay for $49.00, a vr201 for $25, DSD440 dual floppy drives at $185,
complete working pdp8/e with 32k memory, rk05 drive, 4 disk packs, monitor
and keyboard for $800., 10 pack of new 8" floppies for $15, a tested power
supply for a vax 4000 for $25... I try to find as many sources for prices
online as I can then set my asking price below the lowest price I can find.
I will take back anything I sell that dosen't work and I do my best to test
any item before it goes out the door.
Eric, please don't think I'm slamming your post! I am apologizing to you and
those on the forum for missing the boat on pricing these chips. My
intentions are honorable and I welcome all suggestions from other
subscribers. All are welcome to visit our warehouse in Florida and make
offers on anything they see. I have had visits from other cctalk members and
they very pleased with their purchases. You can see a partial list of what
we've inventoried so far at www.tarinc.com
Thank you all for taking the time to read this. Personal emails can be sent
to trestivo(a)tarinc.com
Sincerely,
thom
Hello all,
I recently acquired a Panasonic HHC (the "1400", aka
4K version). However, it didn't include the user
manual. Does anyone have a scanned manual, or can
anyone photocopy and mail one to me? I'll pay the
postage, of course.
-- Evan Koblentz, Boston, Mass.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
working it.... :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: freddy [mailto:nrg@sun.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 6:48 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: OpenVMS VAX hobbysit CD
>
>
> Eric Dittman (dittman(a)dittman.net) wrote :
>
> > > Does anyone have one or know an FTP site?
> > > If one can get real DEC VMS CD's will the hobbyist
> license PAKs work or do
> > > you need the hobbyist CD?
> >
> > You can use DEC/Compaq/HP CDs with the Hobbyist licenses.
>
> can anyone make these for me to download? :(
>
> cheers,
> --
> freddy
>
Today i've added a YARC Systems transputer board to my little IBM-AT coprocessor card collection :-)
Unfortunately, there was no documentation and software included ...
... and YARC Systems seems to be out of business for at least 2 years ...
Does anyone have documentation/software for that little beauty ?
Thanks Bernd
It appears to be the interface for the Tennecomp tape backup system...
Cheers...
Gerald Raine
IBM Global Services
Tel: (206) 674-6688
Fax: (206) 272-8501
Pager: (206) 918-5850
Cellular Phone: (206) 854-7537
"Bill Sudbrink" <wh.sudbrink(a)verizon.net> wrote:
> In high school, we used what I think was called _The_FORTRAN_Coloring_Book_
> (wasn't that what it was called Frank?). That's not the same thing is it?
No, that's a different book from _FORTRAN For Humans_.
Funny, I only remember boring data processing text books, like the one
that told us how to use a keypunch and how to interpret punched cards,
an important skill when I got to U of Maryland and found that the 029
keypunches in the basement of the CS building often did not have fresh
ribbons. (Bill and I attended the same high school, where there was
an HP 3000 Series II (upgraded to a Series III in 1980 I think) for
administrative and academic use.)
But then I might not have paid a FORTRAN text much attention, having
picked that up when we were supposed to be learning BASIC and being
more interested at that time in SPL/3000.
-Frank McConnell
>>John Dundas wrote:
>
>> Anyone have the jumper settings for a 4MB MSV11-QC (M7551-CF) memory
>> board for a PDP-11? I just got one, but don't know how the DIP
>> switches and jumpers should be set. A PDF of the User Guide would be
>> even better, but help or pointers with the jumpers/switches would be
>> great.
>
>Jerome Fine replies:
>
>In general, there should never be a reason to alter the
>jumpers. Since 4 MBytes is the maximum allowed for
>the PDP-11, the hardware would almost always be set
>to use all of the memory. There is probably a bank of
>jumpers for the starting address and a second for the
>ending address. The starting address will probably be
>empty - for zero. The ending address could be full or
>empty. I suggest that if you can't find a manual for the
>settings to just use the board as is. 99.9% of the time,
>I would expect the setting to reflect use of all of the
>memory - if that is what you wish - and I can't really
>understand any other option for 99.9% of the cases.
Based on the MicroNotes, I believe you are correct that the switches are
used to control the starting and ending addresses. The board, as
received, is set to all zero for both. The MicroNote _seems_ to
indicate that the ending address should be set to all 1s. However I'm
wondering if I really need to set the ending address to 4MB - 8KB (for
the I/O page)?
Also, there are quite a few jumpers on the board. They may or may not
be set appropriately. The MicroNote indicates the function of a few of
them, but not nearly all. For example, permit "write wrong parity",
etc.
If anyone has a copy or scan of the original manual, I'd very much
appreciate it.
Thanks,
John
> That's the point that spammers would attack, if they could be
> bothered to try.
I'm sortof wondering what archive sites like the Wayback Machine
are doing to prevent address harvesting, if anything. Seems like
exactly the sort of thing that would be worth some effort prying
open...
> Make damn sure that whatever CGI script you use defends against
> any characters in the email form being interpreted as any sort
> of metacharacters.
Can't stress this point enough. Limiting length is good too, look
to RFCs for figures.
I'd also submit any message via a TCP connection rather than
invoking anything from the script, e.g. `sendmail -bs`. I can
give you a simple example using Perl if you need it.
Hmm, do I have any links/guides for safe web form handling... ?
--S.
Did anyone here learn Fortran from, or just read, any book called "Fortran
for Humans" or "Fortran 77 for Humans"?
I just found out: The CS prof I've been spending so much time with for the
last two years, Rex Page, was the principal author of this book. If anyone
has memories of it (good or bad :-), I bet he would get a kick out of
hearing about it at our next meeting.
--
Jeffrey Sharp
Current idea on spamproofing the archives:
[0] Every email address in the archives is replaced with a shortened form.
For instance:
user(a)domain.com -> user@d...
[1] The shortened address is link to a CGI script like this:
http://www.subatomix.com/cgi-bin/email?asf3uhh0239q0bs
The script generates a page that asks the user to type in a specific
string to prove they're human. The query string above is the email
address with some some simple sort of encryption.
[2] The user types in the string and presses Submit, and it runs the CGI
again, but with the typed string as part of the query string:
http://www.subatomix.com/cgi-bin/email?asf3uhh0239q0bs,abbabdedf
Now the script generates a page with the real email address as a mailto
hyperlink. The user may bookmark this page if he/she wishes.
Surely this is enough to defeat address harvesters. Does anyone see any
problems with this?
--
Jeffrey Sharp
Jim,
The M868 Dectape controller arrived today, and has already surpassed the
usability of the other one I have - it doesn't keep the machine from
running! Now I can get to the business of getting the TU-56 completely
operational. Thanks!
--
Christopher L McNabb
Operating Systems Analyst Email: cmcnabb(a)4mcnabb.net
Virginia Tech ICBM: 37.1356N 80.4272N
GMRS: WPSR255 ARS: N2UX Grid Sq: EM97SD
Anyone have the jumper settings for a 4MB MSV11-QC (M7551-CF) memory
board for a PDP-11? I just got one, but don't know how the DIP
switches and jumpers should be set. A PDF of the User Guide would be
even better, but help or pointers with the jumpers/switches would be
great.
Thanks,
John
How do I get disk images for my C64 from the internet?
Following equipment available:
Apple ibook
usb-> serial port
usb 3 1/4 diskette drive
commodore 64
1541 disk drive
Is there a community of people sharing disks? Preferably physical
disks, perhaps via post (snailmail)?
Company that sells old commodore software?
Thanks...
ron.
>From: "Jeffrey H. Ingber" <jingber(a)ix.netcom.com>
>
>On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 18:31, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>> Hi Jeff
>> This is a manual tool and takes a little practice.
>> You need to first start by stripping about .75 to 1 inch of
>> insulation from the end of the wire. There is a built
>
>Thanks to everyone who provided links. After a few tries I've got it
>figured out =).
>
>I ordered a roll of wire which has a built-in stripper which makes nice
>1" cuts. Pretty easy process, but I find the slit in the tool to be
>annoying, as the wire would continually get caught in it. What is the
>purpose of this? I assume it's to allow you to remove broken wire from
>the tool easily? I just kept a finger over the slit and eventually was
>able to get some good wraps.
>
>If I had to do this more often I would probably spring for a better
>tool, but for a once (or twice-off) this seems to do the job.
>
>Thanks!
>Jeff
Hi
Like any skill, it takes practice. You want to feed the
free end of the wire through the side that doesn't have
the stripper on it. You then push the wire into the
groove with a finger nail. If done correctly, you won't
have a bend in the wire at the stripper and the wire
will not break when you strip it.
You'll find that the spool/stripper unit have the same
problem. The only strippers I've ever found that worked
well on wire wrap were those ones that looked like
small pliers and had white plastic shells that would
guide the wire onto stripper blades. I'm not sure who
sells these as they were units I picked up at a surplus
store.
As for power wrappers. These require some skill to use
as well. With these, one can make a larger mess quicker
than using a manual tool. It is all about practice and
timing. I've used professional electric and air powered
wrapping tools. I also have one of those cheap battery
powered ones at home. With a little practice, I find
that I can do just as good a job with any of them.
I've done larger projects. One needs to plan out the
flow of how you are going to place the wires. Two level
wire wrapping takes planning. Three level is a little
more forgiving but it is easy to bend the pins and cause
shorts.
Dwight
>
>
>> in stripper. Look at the spring steel part in the center
>> of the tool. It has a slit in it that you slide the
>> wire in and then pull the wire from the other side.
>> Now that you have the end, thread the wire from the
>> end, under the small sleeve and along the groove at the
>> side of the shaft. It doesn't have to stay in the groove
>> but make sure it doesn't get kinked or bent badly.
>> Slide the tool and wire over a wire wrap post. Place
>> your index finger at the unwrapper end and twizzle the
>> tool clockwise. This is the tricky part. You need to
>> put enough pressure with your index finger so that
>> there are no opening between wraps but not too much
>> or you'll get overlapped wraps. I also find that the
>> first turn of the tool should have no pressure until
>> the wire has one start wrap. You will also find
>> that you won't be able to twizzle it to completion
>> as one motion. You need to make sure that it doesn't
>> back rotate as you go for another grab with your
>> fingers ( this is where another hand comes in handy ).
>> If you get an opening between wraps, don't think you
>> can just squeeze it down to until it looks OK. This
>> make a loose wrap that will have poor electrical connection.
>> Overlapped wraps should be redone as well.
>> Now, go and practice. You'll get the hang of it soon
>> enough.
>> Dwight
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Does anyone know what system these are for? I've never heard of one before. I had a MD-2 and it used 5 1/4" drives. This is in a biege case about 8" tall x 6" wide x 20" deep. It has ribbon cable header (50 pin?) on the back along with an AC socket and power switch, the drive appears to be a FH Shugart.
Joe
Hi
I forgot to mention. Use a good sharp pair of wire
cutters. If you use some of the cheaper diagonals,
they flatten the wire, rather then cutting it.
This makes the job of stripping much harder since
the covering doesn't slide off easily.
Just more of wire wrap lore.
Dwight
>From: "Dwight K. Elvey" <dwightk.elvey(a)amd.com>
>
>>From: "Jeffrey H. Ingber" <jingber(a)ix.netcom.com>
>>
>>On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 18:31, Dwight K. Elvey wrote:
>>> Hi Jeff
>>> This is a manual tool and takes a little practice.
>>> You need to first start by stripping about .75 to 1 inch of
>>> insulation from the end of the wire. There is a built
>>
>>Thanks to everyone who provided links. After a few tries I've got it
>>figured out =).
>>
>>I ordered a roll of wire which has a built-in stripper which makes nice
>>1" cuts. Pretty easy process, but I find the slit in the tool to be
>>annoying, as the wire would continually get caught in it. What is the
>>purpose of this? I assume it's to allow you to remove broken wire from
>>the tool easily? I just kept a finger over the slit and eventually was
>>able to get some good wraps.
>>
>>If I had to do this more often I would probably spring for a better
>>tool, but for a once (or twice-off) this seems to do the job.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>Jeff
>
>Hi
> Like any skill, it takes practice. You want to feed the
>free end of the wire through the side that doesn't have
>the stripper on it. You then push the wire into the
>groove with a finger nail. If done correctly, you won't
>have a bend in the wire at the stripper and the wire
>will not break when you strip it.
> You'll find that the spool/stripper unit have the same
>problem. The only strippers I've ever found that worked
>well on wire wrap were those ones that looked like
>small pliers and had white plastic shells that would
>guide the wire onto stripper blades. I'm not sure who
>sells these as they were units I picked up at a surplus
>store.
> As for power wrappers. These require some skill to use
>as well. With these, one can make a larger mess quicker
>than using a manual tool. It is all about practice and
>timing. I've used professional electric and air powered
>wrapping tools. I also have one of those cheap battery
>powered ones at home. With a little practice, I find
>that I can do just as good a job with any of them.
> I've done larger projects. One needs to plan out the
>flow of how you are going to place the wires. Two level
>wire wrapping takes planning. Three level is a little
>more forgiving but it is easy to bend the pins and cause
>shorts.
>Dwight
>
>
>>
>>
>>> in stripper. Look at the spring steel part in the center
>>> of the tool. It has a slit in it that you slide the
>>> wire in and then pull the wire from the other side.
>>> Now that you have the end, thread the wire from the
>>> end, under the small sleeve and along the groove at the
>>> side of the shaft. It doesn't have to stay in the groove
>>> but make sure it doesn't get kinked or bent badly.
>>> Slide the tool and wire over a wire wrap post. Place
>>> your index finger at the unwrapper end and twizzle the
>>> tool clockwise. This is the tricky part. You need to
>>> put enough pressure with your index finger so that
>>> there are no opening between wraps but not too much
>>> or you'll get overlapped wraps. I also find that the
>>> first turn of the tool should have no pressure until
>>> the wire has one start wrap. You will also find
>>> that you won't be able to twizzle it to completion
>>> as one motion. You need to make sure that it doesn't
>>> back rotate as you go for another grab with your
>>> fingers ( this is where another hand comes in handy ).
>>> If you get an opening between wraps, don't think you
>>> can just squeeze it down to until it looks OK. This
>>> make a loose wrap that will have poor electrical connection.
>>> Overlapped wraps should be redone as well.
>>> Now, go and practice. You'll get the hang of it soon
>>> enough.
>>> Dwight
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk
>
>> How can I take +6VDC of battery power and get +5VDC regulated power
>> from it? If it matters, the currents involved will be under 1000mA,
>> but probably over 200mA.
>
>Take a look at 'low dropout regulators'. National Semiconductor make
>(made?) them -- LM2940 series I think. They will work down to about 0.6V
>difference between input and output (so for a 5V regulator, you need at
>least 5.6V in). These are similar to the 7805 -- 3 terminals, and you
>need to put a couple of decoupling caps near the chip.
>
>That probably won't let you use all the capacity of your '6V' battery,
>but it should let you use some of it.
>
>Incidentally, I assuem the Zip drive produced 5V internally from this
>battery pack. Any ideas what it used?
>
>-tony
>
>
Hi
He didn't say what kind of batteries he was using
to provide 6V. Different batteries have different
discharge voltages. Even though a lead-acid battery
is fully discharged at 5V. Using it until 5.5V and
then recharging is a good idea for longer life.
Even if the regulator drops below 5V on the output,
most circuits will work down to 4.8V someplace
or lower. A low dropout regulator, as you suggest,
might still be the best option.
Dwight
>From: "Jeffrey H. Ingber" <jingber(a)ix.netcom.com>
>
>Not strictly classiccmp related, but applies to a repair I'm trying
>perform on a "classic" machine. I purchased a wire-wrap tool from
>DigiKey (PN# K104-ND) and a spool of the proper wire. Unfortunately,
>I've never done wire wrap, and it's not obvious how this tool is used.
>Does anyone have any good resources that explains wire wrapping?
>
>For reference, the tool looks like a scredriver, but has two hollow
>ends, one of which has a long slit running down the side.
>
>Thanks,
>Jeff
>
Hi Jeff
This is a manual tool and takes a little practice.
You need to first start by stripping about .75 to 1 inch of
insulation from the end of the wire. There is a built
in stripper. Look at the spring steel part in the center
of the tool. It has a slit in it that you slide the
wire in and then pull the wire from the other side.
Now that you have the end, thread the wire from the
end, under the small sleeve and along the groove at the
side of the shaft. It doesn't have to stay in the groove
but make sure it doesn't get kinked or bent badly.
Slide the tool and wire over a wire wrap post. Place
your index finger at the unwrapper end and twizzle the
tool clockwise. This is the tricky part. You need to
put enough pressure with your index finger so that
there are no opening between wraps but not too much
or you'll get overlapped wraps. I also find that the
first turn of the tool should have no pressure until
the wire has one start wrap. You will also find
that you won't be able to twizzle it to completion
as one motion. You need to make sure that it doesn't
back rotate as you go for another grab with your
fingers ( this is where another hand comes in handy ).
If you get an opening between wraps, don't think you
can just squeeze it down to until it looks OK. This
make a loose wrap that will have poor electrical connection.
Overlapped wraps should be redone as well.
Now, go and practice. You'll get the hang of it soon
enough.
Dwight
Not strictly classiccmp related, but applies to a repair I'm trying
perform on a "classic" machine. I purchased a wire-wrap tool from
DigiKey (PN# K104-ND) and a spool of the proper wire. Unfortunately,
I've never done wire wrap, and it's not obvious how this tool is used.
Does anyone have any good resources that explains wire wrapping?
For reference, the tool looks like a scredriver, but has two hollow
ends, one of which has a long slit running down the side.
Thanks,
Jeff
Do you have any experience using Standard Pneumatic electric wire wrap
tools? 6021 models with bits can sometimes be had on eBay in the $40 range,
which isn't a whole lot more than buying a new manual tool.
Would that be overkill for a small computer project, or would it be nice to
have?
>From: "Jim Kearney" <jim(a)jkearney.com>
>Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
>Subject: Re: Wire wrapping
>Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:06:33 -0500
>
> >From: "Jeffrey H. Ingber" <jingber(a)ix.netcom.com>
> > Does anyone have any good resources that explains wire wrapping?
>
>This web page has some nice, clear explanations and pictures:
>
>http://www.stdpneumatic.com/resource/tech_wire.html
>
>Jim
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
On Dec 6, 22:40, Philip Pemberton wrote:
> Joe wrote:
> > This might be a good time to make a dump of the ROMs before one of
> > them bites the dust.
> I'm not even sure they are 2532s (they might be 2732s). They're TI
branded
> and carry the part numbers "ACE-A" and "ACE-B". I don't have an EPROM
> programmer either...
Besides, the image is on the web:
http://www.home-micros.freeserve.co.uk/JupiterAce/JupiterAce.html
near the bottom of the page.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hello folks,
recently (yesterday) I got a new (for me, of course) AS/400 box, and started
to play with it. Everything started okay, booted with no problems (after a
year unnoticed in the corner). Today a rebooted it (for whatever reason),
turned it on, re-connected the twinax console, but nothing appears. The
green cursor remains in the upper right corner (meaning that the AS/400 didn't
notice the console yet, afaik). Some hints, ideas, places to point me to?
Cheers,
--
freddy
Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote:
> biege case about 8" tall x 6" wide x 20" deep. It has ribbon
> cable header (50 pin?) on the back along with an AC socket and
> power switch, the drive appears to be a FH Shugart.
It's just a drive in an external drive box w/power supply. Morrow
sold S-100 floppy disk controllers and external drives to go with
them.
-Frank McConnell
In a message dated 12/6/02 3:04:32 PM Pacific Standard Time,
rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com writes:
>
>
> Does anyone know what system these are for? I've never heard of one
> before. I had a MD-2 and it used 5 1/4" drives. This is in a biege case
> about 8" tall x 6" wide x 20" deep. It has ribbon cable header (50 pin?) on
> the back along with an AC socket and power switch, the drive appears to be
> a FH Shugart.
>
>
It sounds like it is an external drive cabinet.
Morrow had external cabinets for single and dual 8" floppy and hard drives.
Used with their S100 systems that preceded your MD-2 series. I believe Morrow
got it's start with S100 systems.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
Anyone know what this is? The main unit looks about like a terminal with a builtin CRT and keyboard and has boards in the back that look simialr to STD bus cards (but I didn't look close). There are two other units, one has two 8" floppy drives in it and the other says that it's an expansion unit.
Joe
>I believe he meant 'unlimited users' not 'use'.
PAKs are limited in several ways (not all of which are
used in practice). One typical way was that each PAK would
grant a certain number of "units" for a given product. So
using the FORTRAN compiler on a relatively slow MicroVAX 3900
series box might require say 500 units, while using the
same compiler on a VAX 7000-860 might require
perhaps 10000 units (I'm making up the numbers ...).
Later on, some products switched to activity based licences.
In the above example 500 units allows you as many concurrent
FORTRAN compilations as your MicroVAX can stand. With activity
based licences, your FORTRAN compilation on a certain platform
might eat up 100 activity units so with a 500 activity licence
you could run 5 FORTRAN compiles simultaneously.
Then there were user-based licences ...
In short, it appears that the hobbyist licences are limited
only in time (they expire after a year) but will work without
restriction on both your MicroVAX I and your AlphaServer GS320
during that year.
Antonio
Eric Smith wrote:
> I think you want _TRS-80 Disk and Other Mysteries_. That was one of
> the Mysteries books I didn't have, but ISTR that Al turned up a copy
> recently.
No, that only covers Model I TRSDOS 2.x and NEWDOS 2.1. Sellam asked
about TRSDOS 1.3, which I have to assume means Model III TRSDOS.
> Each track had 10 sectors. They were allocated to files in groups of
> five, which were called granules or grans. There's a Granule
> Allocation Table (GAT) which I think was basically an allocation
> bitmap.
Model I TRSDOS (and single density disks on all TRSDOS-like DOSes that
support single density) uses this format.
--
Tim Mann tim(a)tim-mann.org http://www.tim-mann.org/
I have been trying for the last few days to reach Michael and all my emails
bounce back with fatal errors? Does anyone have a different email address
than these two; editor(a)classictechpub.com and Eletter(a)lyris.dudee.net
Thanks for any help.
> What sort of equipment is this? Old PCs or test gear?
I'll tell once I have it, but it's way cooler than PCs.
Cheers,
Lee.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
I'd agree that the current layout is good. Next, I'd go with the fancier
one, but both are _too pastel_. How 'bout some good, saturated colors?
-----Original Message-----
From: Zane H. Healy [mailto:healyzh@aracnet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:19 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Web Site Question (was: OT: _spam_)
<snip>
Having looked at all three, I rather like the current, but think it would
look better without the busy graphic below the black CLASSICCMP line. Of
the other two, I prefer the 'retro' one, but would recommend white instead
of pale green.
<snip>