>From: "Alex Welti" <lxwelti(a)comcast.net>
>
>I have been handed down a room full of electronics - my
>brother-in-law's father passed away - and I am the nearest relative who
>has a career in electronics, so... I am spending my evenings going
>through and identifing parts, most of which I am familiar with and have
>datasheets on. However, I can't find anything on these i C8702A. A
>web search brought me to your posting. I am hoping you have a datasheet
>or know where I should go to find one.
>
>Thanks,
>Alex
>
Hi Alex
8702A is mostly the same as a 1702A and can be programmed
with any programmer that supports 1702A. The only difference
is that I know of was that the threshold for data was
a slightly different voltage. The 8702A was designed to
tie directly to a 8080 or 8085 without additional buffering.
Otherwise, the 1702A spec will work. If y9ou want the
exact levels, I can look it up.
Most current programmers do not support the 1702A's. You'll
need to find an old programmer someplace.
Dwight
UPS has already come by and they agreed
to process a claim. My options are to get
my money back and give them the machine
or to get it fixed and they pay for the
repairs or replacement -- up to my costs.
I don't think replacement is very possible.
The UPS guy suggested that I go to circuit city or
Best Buy and buy the replacement parts....
Uhhhhh.....
Dave Chu
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:03:22 -0600
From: Jeffrey Sharp <jss(a)subatomix.com>
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Request for help with a PDP 11/73
Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, chu(a)verizon.net wrote:
> I just bought a PDP 11/73, but unfortunately UPS dropped it on the way.
My suggestion would be to attempt an insurance claim. All UPS shipments are
insured for at least $100 automatically. Hopefully you had more on this...
--
Jeffrey Sharp
--__--__--
You may have run out of interrupts for the CF card -- it requires two, one
for the drive interface and one for the card, IIRC. On a laptop I had at
work, I had to disable the modem (which I seldom used) in order to free up a
second interrupt so I could read PCMCIA flash RAM cards that I used in my HP
95LX palmtop.
-----Original Message-----
From: gil smith [mailto:gil@vauxelectronics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:28 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: OT: Compact Flash (CF) cards
<snip>
I got a couple of Compact Flash (CF) cards to play with, and I also got a
CF-PCMCIA adapter to try the cards in my laptop. Unfortunately, I cannot
get Win-frickin-98 to see the card.
<snip>
Does anyone remember what was required to convert an IBM Selectric
Typewriter to a computer printer? I seem to recall a kit of some sort
was available, but my memory is
*really* hazy about that.
>>But DEC as a company is long gone. I am *well* aware of what happened
>>with the DEC -> Compaq -> HP thing.
>
>I don't know. A friend of mine still has his DEC e-mail address.
>
>That doesn't mean anything... up until I was layed off from HP, my
>DEC email address (@zk3.dec.com) still worked, though that domain
>is scheduled to go away at some point. They've been working site
>by site to remove the old dec stuff and replace it with @hp.com.
That's true. However, as long as a computer company's domain exists, as
long as it has a presence on the net, the company still exists in some
little way.
alan
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, chu(a)verizon.net wrote:
> UPS has already come by and they agreed to process a claim. My options are
> to get my money back and give them the machine or to get it fixed and they
> pay for the repairs or replacement -- up to my costs.
Personally? If it's borken enough, I'd give 'em the machine and take the
dough. /73s are common enough that another will come along within a year,
probably sooner.
--
Jeffrey Sharp
Hi,
I am new here; I've been lurking (reading the archives) for a while, decided
to join. Since I retired I've taken up "retrocomputing" and see a lot of
discussion here about systems I'm interested in and hopefully I'll be able
to contribute at times. I am certainly having fun reading the posts - the
recent posts about "middle posting" really cracked me up!
I am interested in 6502 based systems, especially the KIM-1 and SYM-1. I
currently have a VIM-1 and a SYM-1, having years ago been thickheaded enough
to sell my KIM-1. Wish I had one now, can't afford one on eBay. I have
nothing against the AIM-65, I just have never fooled with one and haven't
been able to pick one up yet.
My interest in small 6502's has been extended to small "trainers" with
different CPU's, like the Heathkit ET-3400 and the HP 5036A. One of these
days I may get around to fooling around with PIC's, but I'm still having too
much fun with the old stuff. I'm looking for a copy of the HP book
"Practical Microprocessors, HP part number 05036-90003" if anyone has an
affordable source for one. I have inquiries out to several "manual" sites
and am awaiting replies.
I also have history with PDP-11's, using RT-11 and RSX-11M. I have a
PDT-11/150 at the present and run RT-11 on it. What I'd really like to have
is a H-11 (yeah, I can really afford that...no way) or better yet, a DCT-11
trainer. I saw 3 of the DCT-11's go by this fall on eBay and wasn't in a
position to bid.
In recent years I worked with VAXes and have several VAXStations and
MicroVAXes, in the 3100 and 4000 series. I'm not sure these qualify as
classic (3100-10e, 4000-VLC, 4000-60, 4000-90). I also have a few Alpha's. -
Multia, AlphaStation 200 4/100, and AlphaServer 1000A. I spent the last 10
years of my career as a systems programmer working with OpenVMS in a process
control (SCADA) environment.
I am not so much a collector as a user and builder of computers and
peripherals. By that I mean I'm not trying to corner the market, open a
museum, or that I consider these computers as "investments". I am not likely
to sell anything, but might be interested in buying a few things, especially
documentation for some of the machines I have. What documentation I have I
may at some time convert to PDF and publish for anyone else interested to
play with.
Stuart Johnson
ssj152 AT charter DOT net
New York Times
June 11, 2001
Court Restricts Heat-Sensor Searches
By David Stout
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court today reiterated the right of privacy in the
age of technology, ruling in an Oregon drug case that the police cannot use
a heat-seeking device to probe the interior of a home without a search
warrant.
-----Original Message-----
From: vance(a)neurotica.com [mailto:vance@neurotica.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 8:10 PM
To: Zane H. Healy
Cc: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Collecting, Hacking and the Spooks (was: Gulf War, dummies,
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Zane H. Healy wrote:
<snip>
>
> What I've been wondering about is, how long before we start setting off
> alarms in some Government agency due to our abnormally high use of
> electricity? Or due to the abnormally high level of heat in area's of
> our home?
Back when I used an ES/9000 in my parents house, I managed to attract the
attention of the law. There were two DEA agents from the local office
with one of the local sheriff's deputys with him. They showed up and
asked me if I was growing marijuana. I said something to the effect of,
"What gave you that idea?" They showed me a report from the power
company. I laughed and told them to come look for themselves. They were
quite unprepared for the size of my computer, I can tell you that. 8-)
Peace... Sridhar
Hi folks:
This is off-topic, (and if you are in the sbc6120 group you have already
seen it):
I got a couple of Compact Flash (CF) cards to play with, and I also got a
CF-PCMCIA adapter to try the cards in my laptop. Unfortunately, I cannot
get Win-frickin-98 to see the card.
I have a similar Smartmedia-PCMCIA adapter for camera cards, and it seems
to work fine in the same machine (ibm thinkpad 600e).
In both cases, I inserted the card/adapter, WinBlows sees it and starts the
device wizard to install a "Standard IDE/ESDI Hard Disk Controller." For
the Smartmedia card/adapter, the card automatically appears as a drive in
Explorer, and all is well. For the CF card/adapter, it asked me to reboot,
and even then does not see the card. The Device Manager Status for the
controller says "device not present, not working properly, or does not have
all drivers installed (code 10)." There are no resource conflicts to
correct. However, the controller driver is seen by the PCMCIA utility that
allows me to stop the card for removal.
I've searched at ibm and microsoft, and various google finds, but cannot
make sense of this, and have already spent way too much time on it. Has
anyone had problems or success reading CF cards in Win98 with a PCMCIA
adapter? Is a usb adapter a better choice? Upgrading the o/s is not an
option, since I never intend to give microsoft another penny.
thanks in advance,
gil
;-----------------------------------------------------------
; vaux electronics, inc. 480-354-5556
; http://www.vauxelectronics.com (fax: 480-354-5558)
;-----------------------------------------------------------
I am after some baby at 286/386/486 motherboards of size aprox 8 3/4 inches
x 6 3/4 inches
Can you help
Graham Challis
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of IMSTP.gif]
[demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type Image/jpeg which had a name of 2.jpg]
Recently obtained a *BLUSH* old PC. Normally wouldn't post about it here
but... someone may be interested in a copy of the software on it.
This thing is kind of a slimline desktop case, has a 3.5 floppy and 5.25
floppy. It's a leading edge model 5000AT. I think it is a 286. But what
might be interesting to some is, it comes with something called "windos" I
believe, and is a leading edge specific "make the computer simple" GUI sort
of. Basically just lets you point and click to call 123, easywriter, etc. I
thought someone might be interested in the software & gui files.
God I feel dirty now *G*
Thats what I was hoping. I think that
it is trying to boot from the disk
that I think is dead.
I have a vt420 to hook up, but
I do not have the cabling that I need.
I just bought a gender changer and a
null modem on eBay. When they get here
I will hook it up to see what the console
output says.
Thanks,
Dave Chu
>I just bought a PDP 11/73, but
>unfortunately UPS dropped it
>on the way. So I am trying to
>what ever documentation and
>diagnostics that I can locate
>to figure out how badly it was
>damaged.
>The mounts for the tape drive and
>disk drive were broken as well as
>all of the external plastic.
>The machine powers up and goes through
>some self diagnostics, stopping with the
>LED's reading "01". The disk drive stays
>quite and unlit, my conclusion was that it
>appears dead.
>I am looking for any help that I can get.
>
>TIA,
>Dave Chu
>
>
>
What is reported on the console port?
Plug in a terminal/etc and see what it tells you.
If there is a problem, it should display a more useful
error message.
I believe that at 01, it is trying to boot the software
>from wherever it is set up to boot from.
Sellam raged:
> Here's what I see when I get an index of the my mailbox:
[ pine display removed]
> Here's what it would look like with a pre-pended tag:
[ more pine removed]
> 3/5 of the message topic lines are now gone, making them practically
> useless for getting a quick scan of the message subjects.
Oh. You mean, your stupid mail client cant even widen its display? Get
a real mail client then, dude.
See how fucked-up that comment is? Right. Same goes for another comment
stating that "every decent mail client can do processing". It's simply
not true. Like my statement above. People use all sorts of clients, and
they all have different capabilities.
> I just read and delete through as I go through my inbox.
Try that on my mailbox.
> But, what I'm saying is, we did already go over this in the Great
> Divergence. MUST we REPEAT this STUPID ARGUING over HOW the LIST is
> PRESENTED TIME and TIME and F0!KING TIME aGAIN?
Settle down, dude.
> I mean SHIT! I have never met a more whiny-assed group of nerds in my
> life! If the whining on this list over all the stupid little shit that
> gets whined about could be converted into energy, we'd be able to power
> Asia.
I don't feel like powering Asia. Just my own home would be nice, given the
VAXen here.
I still vote for a small [cc] tag. In front of the subject.
> Just accept it already and SHUT UP!
No.
--fred
>I think that you all didn't saw that i was forgotten to put an 's'
inbetween
>the b and the c of unsub(s)cribe.
>That's why I posted it two times... so the one who clames that I posted
>'unsubscribe' twice ... lies...
>Read your messages closely!!!!!!!
>Michel
Bye now !!!
Rich
Have you ever considered that you are making yourself an excellent
target, your attitude is amusing and you certainly do not play well with
others.
(Is this a top post ?)
Rich Stephenson
California
>What's the difference between spam and these ridiculous mails... I don't
>now...
>Please stop this crap....
>Michel
I am needing to burn PLCC-packaged chips in my DIP programmer. I
expect I need to locate a PLCC<->DIP adapter of the right size
(for 29C010 and 28F101 Flash chips, at the moment). Thinking about it
made me wonder if any of the sockets were ZIF or LIF.
Any ideas? Any recommendation on a source for adapters?
Thanks,
-ethan
I need an 11/93 CPU board Willing to pay top dollar
Steven Keane
Apogee Data Systems
11 Bricketts Mill Road
Hampstead, NH 03841
Phone: 603 329-5676
Fax: 978 964-0561
Toll Free 866 287-2996
Cell: 603 231-8400
Email: skeane(a)apogeedata.com
I have one of the original IBM compatible clones made by Multitech (Plus
700 model). But can not find any of the documentation. Does anyone on
this forum have any information on the internals of this PC?
I have been handed down a room full of electronics - my
brother-in-law's father passed away - and I am the nearest relative who
has a career in electronics, so... I am spending my evenings going
through and identifing parts, most of which I am familiar with and have
datasheets on. However, I can't find anything on these i C8702A. A
web search brought me to your posting. I am hoping you have a datasheet
or know where I should go to find one.
Thanks,
Alex
marvin - still got any Cado hardware/software for sale?
Gary
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Yow, Grumpy Ol' Fred is top-posting:
> But the absolutley most OFF-TOPIC post of all, is sending an UNSUBSCRIBE
> message to the list. Everybody makes mistakes. But doing that TWICE
> invalidates one's rights to gripe about off-topic posts.
Here's a little clue for everyone. Every message from this list
(and others run by Mailman I think) has some headers in it that
tell you (among other things) how to subscribe and unsubscribe:
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk>,
<mailto:cctalk-request@classiccmp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk.classiccmp.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cctalk@classiccmp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cctalk-request@classiccmp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk>,
<mailto:cctalk-request@classiccmp.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/>
Some of these are even valid webby links, so may be usable by the
pointy-clicky set.
> Time to return to discussions of guns and automobiles!
Don't forget the molten iron!
-Frank McConnell
Hi,
May have a line on one of those... I know they're interesting, I've heard
they have something resembling an operator panel, but I've never actually
seen one and I can't find any pics on the web... can anybody point me to
some?
Thanks
Mike
http://www.corestore.org
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> I play games on mine mostly, but want to get a HD to do some programming on
> the system. Flipping floppies is starting to get annoying.
there are a few schematics for Amiga hard disk controllers floating around the
'net, of varying degrees of complexity - I'll see if I've still got any
bookmarked. I seem to remember that the most promising one was all in Russian
though. I went overseas before I could try wiring anything up unfortunately,
but maybe I'll get back on the case someday...
cheers
Jules
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Amazing to see a thread about a computer game with good family values
evolve into a discussion about french postcard porn.
I guess the computing hobby involves a bit too much time spent alone.
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, chu(a)verizon.net wrote:
> I just bought a PDP 11/73, but unfortunately UPS dropped it on the way.
My suggestion would be to attempt an insurance claim. All UPS shipments are
insured for at least $100 automatically. Hopefully you had more on this...
--
Jeffrey Sharp
I'm looking at building a personal lighting project possibly using white
LEDs instead of regular miniature bulbs, and as I browsed the Mouser
catalog, I got a whole lot more confused than less...
I'm trying to get the maximum amount of light for current expended, and the
numbers seem to be nonstandard, or at least not enough info is provided... :-/
Example:
P. 217, "Super Flux LED Lamps"
The white one shows at 20mA it will put out 400-600 "Iv (mcd)"
P. 216, "Blue & White LED Lamps"
The brightest white they have is listed as: "2200->3200
"Luminous Intensity" but with no mention of current or value
(mcd? ucd? )
P. 199, "Thru-Hole White LED Lamps"
"Luminous Intensity" ? current would output 1.7->2.3->2.6
(min/typical/max) mcd...
and on P. 206, there's a few colored LEDs output listed as "Foot Lamberts"...
And Digi-Key has these Surface Mount Incandescent Lamps... :-O The look
cool, but how hot do they get? (It's a very small installation area... It's
still an idea I'm forming, but if it works out, it's a *kewl* idea...)
Any good websites w/info on how to figure out how many LEDs I'd need to
make about a 40W (or more) lightbulb worth of light?
-- Also, my college electronics braincells are rather weak, as I can't
remember if the wattage rating means "total dissapated wattage" or "total
wattage of the circuit branch it's in"... [1]
... I'm getting too old for this ...
Any help/pointers would be *massively cool*...
Thanks!
"Merch"
[1] - I want to use SMT current limiting resistors [2] (fewer holes to
drill...) and the highest wattage ratings I can find is 1/8W... in a 6V
20mA circuit it's running real close... (I could run ~17mA to get a margin
of error... but I want the max light I can get...) RatShaq has 1.2A 6V
wall-warts for a reasonable $, and I wanna build a "different" light
fixture. Of course, I want a *usable* light fixture... ;-)
[2] - I wish I could find SMT white LEDs... :-/
--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger -- sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
zmerch(a)30below.com
What do you do when Life gives you lemons,
and you don't *like* lemonade?????????????
All,
Thanks all for the info. Basically, there's a whole myriad of
cards and monitors for DEC systems, and there's no single tube
that works with them all.
Solution (for me, ymmv) was to get a (cheap! :) multisync monitor
with BNC connectors and sync-on-green capability - I was able to
get a used Iiyama MF8117T (known to US people as IDEK MF8117T)
17" tube. Works like a charm, rock-solid picture on all systems
I could set up for testing. Neat!
I am typing this in a window on that thing, connected to the
VXT2000+ X Terminal, which in turn is connected to my OpenBSD
VAX (4100). Yay!
--fred
At 12:36 AM 2/4/03 -0800, you wrote:
>> Does anyone remember what was required to convert an IBM Selectric
>> Typewriter to a computer printer? I seem to recall a kit of some sort
>> was available, but my memory is
>> *really* hazy about that.
>
Speaking of interfacing Selectrics. I was talking to my father about Teletypes the other day and he told me that he had thrown out an old "word processor" (my term not his). He said that it was a desk sized mechanical unit that had a keyboard and mechanical printer along with a paper tape punch/reader. He said that you could type in a letter and insert a pause any place where you wanted to insert unique data such as a name. The unit would save everything on punched paper tape. You could then feed the PT back into and it would type the letter. When it got to the pause it would stop and let you manually type in the name or other data and then it would continue and finish the letter. Does anyone know what these thing was? I think he must have gotten this after I left home because I don't remember ever seeing it. Unfortunately he threw it away several years ago.
Joe
On Feb 4, 12:49, Jay West wrote:
> That being said - this has come up for discussion several times in
the past,
> and pretty much the majority of people said don't put it in so I left
it
> out. However, if the majority opinion has changed, I'd be happy to
add it
> back. Tis up to you folks! :)
My vote is to leave it as it is, ie no tag, please.
I dislike the wasted space in the subject line (and yes I can make it
wider but I choose not to do so because it suits everything else the
way it is, thanks), and there are plenty of other things in the headers
I can filter on. Besides, once a thread has started I can recognise
the subject lines; I don't need tags.
FWIW, I'm on several other lists, either at home or at work, only a few
of which use tags -- and all of those have at some time exhibited the
recursion problem, apparently because some MUAs munge the subject lines
when replying.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Roger Merchberger" <zmerch(a)30below.com>
>
>I'm looking at building a personal lighting project possibly using white
>LEDs instead of regular miniature bulbs, and as I browsed the Mouser
>catalog, I got a whole lot more confused than less...
>
>I'm trying to get the maximum amount of light for current expended, and the
>numbers seem to be nonstandard, or at least not enough info is provided... :-/
>
>Example:
>
>P. 217, "Super Flux LED Lamps"
> The white one shows at 20mA it will put out 400-600 "Iv (mcd)"
>P. 216, "Blue & White LED Lamps"
> The brightest white they have is listed as: "2200->3200
> "Luminous Intensity" but with no mention of current or value
> (mcd? ucd? )
Hi
I'm not sure what "Luminous Intensity" means but mcd means
milli-candles and ucd means micro-candles.
>P. 199, "Thru-Hole White LED Lamps"
> "Luminous Intensity" ? current would output 1.7->2.3->2.6
> (min/typical/max) mcd...
>
>
>and on P. 206, there's a few colored LEDs output listed as "Foot Lamberts"...
>
>And Digi-Key has these Surface Mount Incandescent Lamps... :-O The look
>cool, but how hot do they get? (It's a very small installation area... It's
>still an idea I'm forming, but if it works out, it's a *kewl* idea...)
>
>Any good websites w/info on how to figure out how many LEDs I'd need to
>make about a 40W (or more) lightbulb worth of light?
This is not so easy to figure. You need to know how efficient
the LED's are, relative to standard bulbs. It seems like I saw
something that said that LEDs were not quite as efficient as
fluorescent lamps but still better than incandescents. If we figured
them at twice as efficient, you'd need 20W's of LEDs. Watts is
just the current times the voltage. You figure this for each LED
and add them all together. LEDs do require a circuit to limit
the current. When you figure your total light output, you don't
count the loss in the control circuit. Of course, for the final
tally, you'll need to include this as well.
When driving a number of LED's, it is better to drive a large
number in series because you only need one current limiting
circuit. The count of LED's would depend on the voltage source
you have available. You'd have the total LED voltage plus
the drop needed across your current limiting cicuit.
Dwight
>
>-- Also, my college electronics braincells are rather weak, as I can't
>remember if the wattage rating means "total dissapated wattage" or "total
>wattage of the circuit branch it's in"... [1]
>
>... I'm getting too old for this ...
>
>Any help/pointers would be *massively cool*...
>
>Thanks!
>"Merch"
>
>[1] - I want to use SMT current limiting resistors [2] (fewer holes to
>drill...) and the highest wattage ratings I can find is 1/8W... in a 6V
>20mA circuit it's running real close... (I could run ~17mA to get a margin
>of error... but I want the max light I can get...) RatShaq has 1.2A 6V
>wall-warts for a reasonable $, and I wanna build a "different" light
>fixture. Of course, I want a *usable* light fixture... ;-)
>
>[2] - I wish I could find SMT white LEDs... :-/
>
>--
>Roger "Merch" Merchberger -- sysadmin, Iceberg Computers
>zmerch(a)30below.com
>
>What do you do when Life gives you lemons,
>and you don't *like* lemonade?????????????
Well,
Intergraph still makes computers, they're just PCs.. But you guys missed
Concurrent, the descendant of Interdata and Perkin-Elmer, who specializes in
Video On Demand solutions.. they also bought Harris's computer division, for
the nighthawk. I think MODCOMP is still around in some form also..
Will J
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> I just bought a PDP 11/73, but
> unfortunately UPS dropped it
> on the way. So I am trying to
> what ever documentation and
> diagnostics that I can locate
> to figure out how badly it was
> damaged.
> The mounts for the tape drive and
> disk drive were broken as well as
> all of the external plastic.
Jeez, man, that REALLY sucks. My sympathies, and I hope that some of the
DECsters here on the list can help you revive the beast. Please keep us
posted.
Glen
0/0
Case dismissed, I'll drop the subject (without tags, even) now
that I am getting personal attacks about it.
I'll just unsubscribe, that will get rid of the OT banter as well.
--fred
From: Fred N. van Kempen <Fred.van.Kempen(a)microwalt.nl>
To: Glen Goodwin <acme(a)ao.net>
Subject: OT/Admin: tags
Date: 02/04/2003 12:10 AM
> Given the volume of the list, and the many off-topic (lets not discuss
> what is and is not on-topic here) talk, I would like to propose [again]
> that we do like other lists do: insert a tag [cctalk] in the Subject:
> line of the postings, so it's easy to distinguis the postings from
> other, perhaps more pressing e-mail.
[snip]
> I don't want to start Yet Another Discussion, a mere vote would do, as
> we're all techies who know what this is about.
My vote, FWIW: the list works fine the way it is.
Later --
Glen
0/0
"Fred N. van Kempen" <Fred.van.Kempen(a)microwalt.nl> wrote:
> See how fucked-up that comment is? Right. Same goes for another comment
> stating that "every decent mail client can do processing". It's simply
> not true. Like my statement above. People use all sorts of clients, and
> they all have different capabilities.
If your mail software doesn't do what you need it to do, maybe you
need to complain to whoever sells and supports it, or find other mail
software that does do what you need done. Asking the rest of the net
to change so that you can keep using losing software is not nice.
> I still vote for a small [cc] tag. In front of the subject.
Here's how that works out here: I set up my mail software to strip the
tag so I don't have to see it. (Clearly, my mail software wins: it
doesn't just do what I need, but also what I want.) Then, when I
reply to the list, my reply's subject does not have the tag. So
messages in the thread can have at least three different subjects:
[cc] foo
Re: [cc] foo
[cc] Re: foo
I'd bet that there's a fourth possibility based on phase of the moon:
[cc] Re: [cc] foo
Do you begin to understand why I think subject tags are not a good
idea?
> > Just accept it already and SHUT UP!
> No.
Yep, that's the problem. The way your message came across out here
in Sillycon Valley was: "I know we've been over this before, so there's
no need to discuss it, just vote to do this and then us folks who cling
to our losing software will stop bringing it up." This is not the way
to win friends and influence people, not that there's much hope of
influencing me on this point.
-Frank McConnell, filtering his incoming e-mail since 1994
>But another problem with prepending something to the subject line could be
>the recursing going on...
>
>Notice subject line...
That's why I vote for no prepending.
I am on some lists that do this, and long discussions (like this list is
notorious for) end up quickly becoming nothing more than a subject line
of "Re: [cc]" repeated over and over.
And no, a smart list server that can handle tags (and thus not insert
them on messages that already have them, or insert them after the Re:)
doesn't always help. Some mail clients/services munge them. And all it
takes is one person in the discussion with an effected client, and the
whole thing gets thrown out of whack.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
> John wrote"
> > Yes, please... *every* other maillist I subscribe to has [mailistname]
> > prepended to the "Subject" field...except for Classiccmp, which
> > generates three times the message traffic the others do combined...
>
> Please DON'T do this. Only about 5% of the mailing lists I subscribe
> to have this, and it annoys the heck out of me because it just keeps
> me from seeing that many characters of the subject line in the summary
> view.
I'd like to agree with Eric, and also to remind people that this has been
tried on the CLASSICCMP mailing lists, and it annoyed the H*** out of so
many of us that it was stopped.
One major problem I have with it is that it prevents the email software I
use from being able todproperly sort the messages!
Zane
Hi everyone,
A number of people have complained to me about not being able to unpack the
tarball with Ultrix V4.20 sources that has been on my FTP site since May 2001.
I have finally found the time to look into the problem and indeed the file was
corrupt. Fortunately, I was able to read my old backup tapes (from Cleveland,
OH, 1999-07-15) without any problems, and discovered to my great joy that this
file was good on my Cleveland machine. (It apparently got corrupted in one of
the turbulent moves from Cleveland to Dallas, TX and then to Orange County, CA.
I don't have any idea how.)
ivan.Harhan.ORG:/pub/UNIX/thirdparty/Ultrix-32/sources now contains *good*
Ultrix V2.00 and V4.20 sources. (Be warned, though, that this machine resides
in my cave which is connected to the outside world through a modem which
usually connects at 31200 BPS, sometimes 28800. Feel free to set up a mirror.)
For what it's worth, I have also put up my Ultrix V4.20 distribution tape
images in /pub/UNIX/thirdparty/Ultrix-32/ult420vaxdist-tk50. They are quite
incomplete, however, as when I had the tape in my hand (at CWRU in spring 1998)
I was unable to read it entirely without errors. Therefore, the V4.00 tape
images in /pub/UNIX/thirdparty/Ultrix-32/ult400vaxdist-tk50 will probably be
more useful for most people. If you have the guts, install V4.00 and then
recompile V4.20 from the sources!
--
Michael Sokolov
Programletarian Freedom Fighter
International Free Computing Task Force
Let the Source be with you
Programletarians of the world, unite!
"Jay West" <jwest(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Nope, this was graphical, not character based. The computer booted into the
> gui, and when you clicked on like "program manager" it gave you a gui list
> of programs configured (you could add & modify). If you clicked on those
> with the mouse, the computer switched to character mode and ran the
> character based application.
So tell us, Jay, how do you feel about PAM on an HP Vectra? As near
as I can tell the only difference is how fancy they get with the video
controller.
-Frank McConnell
Hello, all:
I bought a STDBUS instrumentation computer off of eBay last week for
$9, and it has some interesting boards in it. Unfortunately, the boards are
mostly older Pro-Log models and information is sparse. I've made contact
with the "legacy" manufacturer who wants $50 per manual for two of the
boards. I found information for two of them on VersaLogic's Web site.
So, here's the list of boards. If any one has original Pro-Log
manuals for these that they can copy and send me, please contact me
off-list.
Pro-Log# Description
7303 DSKY (Display/keyboard module)
7502 Relay output module (8 relays)
7605 Programmable I/O
7806-1 Z80 CPU card (I have copy of VersaLogic's manual)
Other P-L boards from another system I have:
Pro-Log# Description
7805-1 8085 CPU card
7604A 64-bit digital I/O (I have copy of VersaLogic's
manual)
Thanks again for any help.
Rich
Hi everybody:
> Space Shuttle issues other than the computers are off-topic.
Having in mind Eric's recommendation, I do this change of subject to
difference this thread from others more, ehh... "off-topic".
> Does anyone have the manuals for HAL/S, the language used for the
> AP-101 software? There's some info on it at:
> http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/computer
Some time ago appeared one manual on eBay. I couldn't obtain it.
But my interest is still active.
Greetings
Sergio
Anyone in the south or east bay have a spare Apple IIe with disk controller or
just a spare disk controller they would part with cheap or free?
I'm finally getting through a couple of higher-priority projects and have time
to start on my "Get a ddial up and running again" project.
Thanks!
Does anyone know where I could find documentation for a *rackmount*
DEC7000? HPaq has plenty for the cabinet model, but I need to get into
a rackmount unit and I'd like to RTFM *before* I take wrenches to it.
I know that's heresy, but that's the way I am....
Doc
I got this thing (Dolch Logic Instruments 8086 Trace Module) along with a
bunch of other stuff at auction. If it is of any use to anybody, let me know
right away. Otherwise it will soon get scrapped or trashed or binned or
skipped, and it looks too nice a piece of work for that.
Best regards,
Dan McDonald
Bellows Falls, Vermont
USA
>>But DEC as a company is long gone. I am *well* aware of what happened
>>with the DEC -> Compaq -> HP thing.
>
>I don't know. A friend of mine still has his DEC e-mail address.
That doesn't mean anything... up until I was layed off from HP, my
DEC email address (@zk3.dec.com) still worked, though that domain
is scheduled to go away at some point. They've been working site
by site to remove the old dec stuff and replace it with @hp.com.
Megan
The gentleman below is looking for a replacement video card for his DEC
Pro-350. I don't have anything for him, but I was hoping someone on the
list might be able to help him out.
Please contact him at the email address shown below if you can do
anything for him.
Thank you,
Erik
-----Original Message-----
From: michael allegretta [mailto:mikeallegretta@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:13 PM
To: webmaster(a)vintage-computer.com
Subject: DEC Pro 350
I have a DEC Pro 350 that I value for running Fortran programs. The
monochrome video generator board is on its way out. Is it possible to
get a replacement?
Regards,
Mike
>> Actually, DEC is still somewhat around -- it was absorbed into Compaq
in
>> 1997, and, of course, Compaq was absorbed into HP last year. As such,
>> HP now holds all the rights and histories to everything DEC and
Compaq.
>> DEC/Compaq provided contract on-site tech support to my current and
past
>> two retail firms. HP provides those services now, with the same (if
>> older) DEC and Compaq field techs. I still work with many of them in
my
>> current tech support position.
>
>But DEC as a company is long gone. I am *well* aware of what happened
>with the DEC -> Compaq -> HP thing.
I don't know. A friend of mine still has his DEC e-mail address.
>> And, while we're asking, does anyone know what happened to Burroughs?
>> As I left the Air Force in 1991, I was working with a cantankerous,
>> already jurassic, cobbled-together system produced by "Convergent
>> Technologies -- an abortive fusion of Burroughs and NCR. It's
"banded"
>> 512K memory board nearly neasured a square foot by 1.5" thick, and was
>> banded to *prevent* it from accessing a full 1Mb of memory.
>Burroughs and Sperry merged to form Unisys.
OK, what happened to the things that made Burroughs Burroughs? I worked
there from 1986 to 1989. The B1000 machines were EOL'ed when I got
there and I pretty much had the B1965 at Lake Forest (Orange Co., CA) to
myself doing support for HOSTLINK and GEMCOS. I think Art Sorkin (Mr.
B1000 MCP) had one in Mission Viejo doing MCP support. I never cared
much for the Pasadena machines (the V-Series or Medium systems) and I
don't know when they were EOL'ed. There was a lot of B5000/Large
System/A-Series hardware development after I left, but I don't know what
happened to those machines. Is anyone still commercially running any of
this hardware?
I am not sure which CT machines you are talking about or if you have the
full story on CT. When I joined Burroughs, they were selling a line of
desktop computer called B20 (even though there were B3x machines).
These machines were made by CT and ran an OS called BTOS (a variant on
CT's own CTOS). They were kinda cool because the form factor for each
component was something like a 10" tall by 10" deep by 4" wide box
(called a 'slice') and you added slices together (say, a CPU slice, a
display slice and a disk slice) to make a working computer.
alan