> From: "Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
> Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Al Hartman wrote:
> > I always preferred Tandon TM-100 drives. They
> > needed a lot less service and maintenance than
> > the SA400's did.
> > And I always liked having the extra 5 tracks.
>
> I agree
> I really like those drives. The pins that hinge the
> doors don't hold up well to the abuse of a college
> lab (unless you catch the culprits and break their
> fingers), but without that abuse, they hold up very
> well.
Oh Man! I forgot ALL about that...
I found it wasn't the pins themselves, it was the
plastic hinges in the doors.
A friend used to keep the broken ones after we'd
replace them (I worked for a company that serviced
these drives.. Cleaned, re-aligned, repaired.
refurbished them...), and refurbish them for his
personal drives with metal hinges.
> > Boy, those were the days...
>
> They sure were. (except for some of the politics
> :-)
I must have somewhere all sorts of patched OS'es for
my old Model I. DoubleDOS, TrsDOS, NewDOS 2.1,
NewDOS/80, LDOS, VTOS, DosPLUS, the list goes on and
on...
I used NewDOS/80 for most things, followed by
Multi-DOS.
I have here a Percom flippy drive. It was a Wangtek
mechanism (I think) that had write protect, and sector
hole sensors on both sides of the drive, so you could
write to both sides of a disk without punching holes.
I got rather good at that, and used to sell home-made
kits for people to punch their own disks. As well as
installing Electric Pencil Lowercase Mods into Model I
Keyboards.
Micros back then were more like cars. You could
customize them heavily. Only now with all these
case-mods and cooling options are we getting back into
what used to be fun about being a Computer Hobbyist.
All things come around in a circle I guess...
My Model I was stolen from my apt twice, and I
recovered it twice because it was instantly
recognizable as mine. A local Model I guru knew my
machine and when it came in to him for service by the
kid who bought it out of the trunk of a car, he called
me and the police.
The kid complained he was out his $100.00 and wanted
it back from me. But, I felt... You buy stolen
equipment, you take your chances...
I didn't press charges when I got the machine back
though.
The first time it was stolen, the guy realized that
nobody would buy it from him, it was so custom.. So he
tried to ransom it back to me.
I said sure...
His ransom payment was me, and 5 friends with baseball
bats.
The police were stunned that I recovered the system
twice.
Those REALLY were the days...
*sigh!*
Regards,
Al
P.S.: though not booted in several years, my Model I
(which just turned 24 yo) is sitting a foot away from
me on a desk. I should hook it all up and give it a
boot for old times sake.
cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 23.02.2003:
----------<snip>-----------
From: Jeffrey Sharp <jss(a)subatomix.com>
Subject: M9312 Bootstrap Questions
>
>First, I'm confused about what version of the module I have. My 11/34 user's
>manual (EK-11034-UG-001 '77) talks about a -YA, -YB, and -YF version of the
>board.
>
I also always wondered about this, and never found any clues. But don't bother,
its not very important. Those variation-codes just describe the situation of
the module at the time the first customer took them from the box, soon as you
change a prom or switch, its something else...
So just run the 9312 diagnostic from XXDP, it will print a nice summary for you
how the unit is momentarely configured and what its capabilities are. It will
also certify correct operation of your M9312 on top of that.
I hope you can boot anything else, do you have a DL11-W? You could use this
with a PeeCee emulated TU58 for diagnostics ect. If you need the Boot-prom for
TU58 write me off-list.
>My M9312 has no -Yx designator and has only one bootstrap ROM installed
>(756A9 for RK03/05/05J or TU55/56). The M9312 manual seems to make the most
>sense in this case, so I've been believing its side of the story. However,
>the DIP switch settings on my M9312 have me puzzled. Here they are:
>
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
> ON ON ON OFF OFF OFF OFF OFF ON ON
>
>This doesn't correspond to anything in either manual! According to the
>manual I'm trusting, this says to start executing at 765406 (in the console
>emulator ROM). It needs to be 765020 (with diags) or 765144 (without diags).
>
>Supposedly, the machine was functional when it was decommed, so my first
>instinct is to assume I am (or the docs are) wrong somewhere. However, its
>previous owner (another collector) was not able **IIRC** to get a register
>printout at power-up. So maybe the DIP switch is pointing to someplace that
>isn't a valid entry point. I don't have access to the complete M9312 print
>set, which would list the ROM contents.
>
>Should I reset the DIP switch to say 765020?
>
That depends on the physical socket-location where the 756A9 is plugged into.
Alternatively, you could use 773000 that will give you console-odt from where
you can interactively select the boot you desire.
Hope you get it to work,
Frank Arnold
Sellam,
You have it reversed again...
The only reason Cuba has economic sanctions is because
Castro refuses to step down, and allow the Democratic
Government that his people want.
Also, that Cuba supports and funds a lot of South
American Terrorism.
Just like Iraq, it is totally in Castro's power to
make life better for his people. Just step down and
let them vote for a new leader.
Again, you blame police for the crime, rather than the
criminals.
> Actually, the only reason Cuba is worse off with
> Castro is because the US continues to economically
> sanction Cuba because our government doesn't agree
> with Castro's politics.
>
> I'm not saying everything the US does is stupid, but
> a lot of the things that the US does is stupid.
I would agree with that, but this isn't one of them.
Personally, I would like to see the sanctions lifted
as they don't seem to make a difference to Castro. He
is determined to stay in power anyway.
The only good thing is he will probably be too sick to
lead, or dead within 10 years, and probably at that
point the sanctions will be lifted.
A lot of mistakes were made in the U.S.'s policies
towards Cuba. And its' handling of the situation. No
doubt about that.
But hindsight is ALWAYS 20/20.
Al
> And you are also one of the people who think America
> is the one who should make the rules for everyone.
> *sigh* *shakes head*
>
> This country does many things of which I am ashamed.
> Anyone whose told me otherwise have never come up
> with any proof.
>
> Peace... Sridhar
Based on the off-list conversation we had, it's much
more likely you decided not to listen to the proof...
I've never said the the U.S.A. should make the rules.
But, how can you quibble with the concept that it's
wrong for a county to attack it's neighbors, or to
build up offensive weapons?
Or, to defy the United Nations when they order you to
disarm?
The only way the U.S. figures into all of this, is
that it has the backbone that the U.N. does not have.
The backbone to back up it's own resolutions.
It's the same in international affairs, personal
affairs and in raising children...
When you make a threat, or set a condition upon
behavior, you have to follow through with the penalty
when the wrong behavior happens. Otherwise, you teach
that person (and others) that rules, threats and
responsibility are meaningless...
Nobody wants war, but in case such as this... This war
will prevent the deaths of millions. Not only by Iraq
and Hussein, but by others in the future who will take
this example to embolden themselves to do evil without
fear of retribution.
The penalty for breaking laws and rules must be swift
and predictable. That's the only way for there to be a
deterrent.
Saddam Hussein can avoid the war in a minute. He
simply can abide by the U.N. agreements, disarm
himself of the illegal weapons and technology, and
dedicate himself to making a good life for his
countrie's citizens.
He would have the added benefit of having the embargo
for sale of his oil lifted upon full compliance and
good behavior.
It's much more in his interest to do that, than the
course that he has chosen.
How can anyone disagree that what he is doing is sheer
madness? The guy can't live without fear of
assasination...
His life must be desperate and awful. And all by his
own choice...
Putting attention on the U.S. or President Bush is
wrong. That's focusing on the wrong end of the
situation.
Why aren't there protests calling for all police
forces to be disbanded? Using the same arguments that
people are using against this war, if the police
didn't carry guns or shoot criminals committing acts
of crime, why... There'd be a lot less death in the
world.
Just let the criminals alone....
In fact, how wonderful would it be for all the prisons
to be empty, and the courts to have nothing to do...
It's all the fault of those crazy police who capture
criminals for the fun of it. Because they LOVE to
shoot and hurt people...
Al
> What he doesn't realize is he is now a permanent
> resident of my ignore list.
Cool!!!
> He actually had the audacity to quote the ten
> commandments to someone whose religious beliefs and
> oaths contradict many of them,
If your religious beliefs contradict:
- Don't Steal
- Don't Murder
- Don't take your neighbors wife or property away
- Honor your parents
- Take a day off to rest
Then, I'm glad I'm not a member of that religion...
> and try to say that it should be the basis for
> international law. He causes me much
> nausea.
I didn't say it SHOULD be. I said IT IS...
Ask anyone who has studied law. Most of today's laws
are based on the 10 Commandments, The Golden Rule and
the Laws of Hammurabi.
The basic concepts carry, even if the details are
different.
If you bothered to actually read my message, rather
than be "offended" by it. You'd have understood that.
I don't claim to be the creator of that concept. I
read it somewhere, and found that I agreed with it.
The 10 Commandments are acutally pretty religion
neutral as most religions have similar "laws" and that
particular set is share between Judaism, Christianity
and several other derivative religious faiths.
But, please be offended by the thought that good ideas
are universal. Or that just because one faith brought
up an idea that it belongs ONLY to that faith and not
to other faiths, or even in the secular world.
So silly.
Good ideas, are good ideas. No matter who created
them.
> Peace... Sridhar
Al
> The platters are very sensitive to fingerprints and other environmental
> contact. What is a good, quick, and cheap way to treat the platters
> before completing the clock that will seal and protect the platters
> without yellowing or cracking?
have you tried using clear laquer on them? They used that on the alloy wheels
on my car and it's only now starting to give up after 30 years - and that's
with outdoor weathering. I suspect that sort of lifetime will outlast any clock
mechanism based on plastic gearing anyway...
cheers
Jules
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Please excuse the brief test. I'm trying to troubleshoot a replacement mail server.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
ARS KC7GR (Formerly WD6EOS) since 12-77 -- kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates that it would be superior
to what I have now..." (Taki Kogoma, aka Gym Z. Quirk)
I have a Shurgart 8" floppy drive available. See at
http://gallery.owt.com/users/a/anheier/61.jpg
It needs to be thoroughly cleaned, but should be restorable. Best offer.
Thanks Norm
> From: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf(a)siconic.com>
>
> Based on the off-list exchanges we had, your "proof"
> was most likely merely jingoistic non-sequiturs
> that Sridhar would have probably found as stupid as
> I did.
Being that you haven't read said reply, you can't
possibly make a comment on them. I notice, as usual
you stoop to personal attacks rather than discuss the
issue.
> > But, how can you quibble with the concept that
> it's wrong for a county
> > to attack it's neighbors, or to build up offensive
> weapons?
>
> Look, every time you open your mouth you contradict
> yourself. When will you realize that everything
> you ascribe as the reasons for which we want
> to go to Iraq, the US has committed the same? Are
> you seriously this dense?
Personal attack.
And what contradiction.
When has the U.S. attacked it's neighbor?
Last I heard Canada and Mexico are unmolested. And
before you bring up stuff that's 100's of years old,
you can't address stuff that old with todays mores.
Iraq attacked it's neighbors in modern times, with
modern weapons.
> This is typical of the mindset of control freaks:
> everyone else is a child and must be punished if
> they don't do as we tell them. I consider this
> deviant psychological behavior.
Personal Attack yet again.
Do you understand a basic concept?
It's called "Being one's word".
When Iraq AGREED to disarm, to not own or develop
weapons of mass destruction, and then broke those
agreements. That's where the problem lies.
It's not about "control" or being a "control freak".
Adults make agreements and keep them.
That's the only way world affairs can work. Treaties
and agreements have to be kept, and there must be
trust that they will be.
When they are broken, they must be enforced. Otherwise
the entire house of cards based on agreements and
"word" collapses.
That leads to chaos.
> > Nobody wants war, but in case such as this... This
> > war will prevent the deaths of millions. Not only
> > by Iraq and Hussein, but by others in the future
> > who will take this example to embolden themselves
> > to do evil without fear of retribution.
>
> Contradiction.
None that I can see.
You'd like there to be one, so that you can attack me
personally.
It's a common tactic of people who are unable to have
intelligent discussions of issues.
Instead of discussing the issue or facts, and keeping
the discussion on that level. You attack the person
directly.
I could be the world's worst idiot. But, if I was
speaking a truth... What difference does that make?
I could be a drooling idiot and point up and burble
"Sky.. Blue..."
The fact that I could be an idiot, doesn't change the
fact that sky is indeed blue.
So keep the discussion on the facts, rather than
making personal attacks. When you do this, you rob
yourself of any power, and ability to have your
opinions considered and respected, and convince people
that they must be indeed, invalid since you needed to
make a personal attack.
> No it's not. It's in our power to change our
> President's ill pursuits because we elected the
> bastard and we can take him down.
I got news for you. Our President is not doing ANY
"ill pursuits". He has the highest sustained approval
rating of ANY President in history.
He is doing the right thing most of the time.
I got that you don't like what he's doing, and don't
agree with it. It doesn't make him wrong.
> He's OUR servant, and our problem. Saddam Hussein
> is someone else's tyrant, not outs.
No. He surrendered to us in a war. He has made
agreements with our Government AND the U.N. that he is
not keeping.
He attacked two of our allies, was defeated and he
must disarm to keep the terms of the treaty.
He is not doing that, and that makes it our business.
Sticking our heads in the sand (or up a bodily
orifice) as you would have us do, does not make the
problem go away, and emboldens others to break
agreements or to attack their neighbors without fear
of reprisals.
> Simple: we are not the police force of the world.
People would like us not to be.
I'm not sure where I stand on this.
Generally, I'm happy when we take principled stands
against terrorism, and agression against neighbors.
> Of course, logic eludes you, Al.
Not at all.
I would recommend you go to college, take some World
History and Civics courses. Also Ethics.
You hold some naive opinions. That sound good on the
face, but don't hold up under rigorous scruitiny.
They only seem good on the face, but when you extend
the consequences of what you would like to see happen
out on a timeline, you see that they don't actually
bring about the things you claim to stand for.
"Peace at any cost" is a misused statement. Often, the
price of peace IS war. Perhaps it wouldn't seem so
contradictory if you consider that in this context...
"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure..."
If there were some science fictional way to look at
alternate timelines where we could see the different
outcomes for different decisions, perhaps there'd be
some data for you that might convince you of this.
Having this stand that I hold, takes some faith. It
takes trust that there are things that never happened
that we will never hear about, because they were
deterred.
If every country or terrorist made a press release
saying...
"I was going to do X, but didn't do it because I was
afraid that the U.N., the U.S., the U.K., etc... Would
punish me for doing it..."
Then, you'd see how well deterrence works.
There was an article in Time Magazine (or it may have
been Newsweek) fairly recently that said, that when
the U.S. pulled out of Vietnam, it emboldened all
sorts of actions.
Within three years of the pull-out, American Embassies
were attacked, Cuba stepped up it's actions in South
America, and more.
Backing down has consequences.
It's a tough row to hoe, and not as simplistic as you
make it.
Al
Does anyone on here know anything about a digital computer demostrator unit made by IBM in the late '50s? It's housed in a nice wooden box about 2 feet wide x 15" deep x 12" tall. On the top of the box is a brass plaque that says "Presented by International Business Machine Corporation". Inside is a grey painted metal box with a row of ten 9-pin tube sockets along the back of top. In front of each socket is a single nean light. In front of that are blocks with small holes for jumper wires similar to those used in the Heathkit trainers. One end of the box has a male Jones plug connector and the other end has a female connector. It looks like the units were made so that additional units could be stacked together. On the front side of the grey box is a tag about 1 1/2" x 3" that says IBM in large letters. In a compartment on the right side of the wood case is a power cable that plugs into one of the Jones plug connectors. Under the grey metal chassis is a compartment with jumper wires, spare neon lamps and other small parts. Along the front edge of the box are two rows of holes that hold modules that plug into the sockets in the metal chassis. Each module is an open chassis about an inch square and 4 to 7 inches tall. Each chassis has at least one vacuum tube in it and some have two tubes, one above the other. Each chassis has a metal hoop or bail that goes up and over the top of the top most tube and back down the other side to form a handle for inserting and removing the chassis. On the top of the bail is a small tag with numbers like "TR-2", etc. Besides the tubes the chassis also have other small components such as resistors and capcitors. There are a total of twenty of the small chassis and each one can be plugged into any of the sockets in the main unit but you have to set a number of jumpers on each socket to a get the correct voltages for each of the tube elements. The tubes can be configured as logic elemements such buffers, invertors, various gates, etc and they jumpered together to form more complex d
e
such as flip flops. Evidently the nean lamps are used to indicate the state of each logic element. The guy that had it was quite specific and said that is is NOT an analog computer but a digital one. I went through it trying to find a model number or date but could only find the number 56 stamped on some of the tubes. I'm not sure if that's the manufacturering date or not but it's probably close.
Can anyone tell me more about this thing or even (HOPEFULLY) have a manual for it?
PS this came from the University of Florida.
Joe
Hi,
I got a strange board in recentley. Made by DEC, Quad-heigh, Dual-width, only
one double sided 2x18 pin edge-connector that is snmaller as usual, aperantley
carrying only power-supply connections. Has some 80 SSI/MSI TTL-chips, one prom
19-10818-02, and 10pcs 93l422 256kx4 ram's. Chips have 1979 date codes.
The strange thing about this board is, that there is hardley any external
connections, there is 1 (one) split-lug terminal, and one 16 pole IC-socket, as
normalley used for automated testing signal connection.
On the solderside there is the wording: "Waveform Generator" and 5012514F-P1
Who knows what this board is, and what it does? In what equipment was it used?
How and for what purpose are the 10 Mbit of RAM filled with what kind of data?
Fieldguide says:
M7071 U Video Display Sys: image memory, RAMs & buffer logic.
I don't understand this, because ther is no unibus-connection on this module at
all. Is it a part of something bigger?
Thanks,
Frank
In a message dated 2/21/03 8:26:42 AM Pacific Standard Time,
fernande(a)internet1.net writes:
> Oh, your one of those people, who thinks it'a about oil.
>
It isn't??? 60 percent of the setup costs from moving our Army/Navy over
there are Fuel costs.
All of Bush's decisions consider how it impacts the price of oil, and how
much money his friends will make.
I have heard Administration Spokespeople say that the Iraqi oil will
reimburse the US for the cost of the war. How else does he expect to pay for
the war when he is running deficits.
It is all about Oil and how much money the oil industry can make before the
resources run out.
Bush's goal is to make as much money for his oil friends as possible. What do
you think the current run up in prices is?
This is also why he is gutting environmental protections and ignoring global
warming.
This is why you can buy vehicles with the worst MPG and get tax credits.
It is all about OIL. If you view each of Bush's actions through an oil filter
it make them quite understandable. Bush and his friends are Oilmen.
Paxton
Astoria, OR
PS: Sorry for the off topic post, It finally just got to me.....
> From: "Fred Cisin (XenoSoft)" <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
>
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Al Hartman wrote:
> > > I am looking for a 5 1/4" floppy drive for a
> > > TRS-80.
>
> > That's fine, but you still haven't provided the
> > specific information about WHICH TRS-80 you needed
> > a drive and cable for...
>
> He sent me a private post clarifying.
> He has a TRS-80 Model 1, and is looking for an
> ORIGINAL drive for it (external, with case, power
> supply, and cable).
> Preferably the original SA400 35 track.
I always preferred Tandon TM-100 drives. They needed a
lot less service and maintenance than the SA400's did.
And I always liked having the extra 5 tracks.
I've seen a few of these pop up on E-Bay.
Unless you have one for him, or someone on the list...
eBay may be his best bet.
I have 4 40 Track DSDD 360k PC Drives mounted in an
old PC Compatible case (XT style), that has a LONG
cable coming out the back. I use this for both my Coco
and my Model I (when it was working, my EI is shot and
while I have an LNW EI, I want a new KB unit as well).
The other thing about SA400 drives, is to make sure he
isn't using a patched version of TRSDOS or NewDos/80
or whatever...
If the stepping speed of the DOS is too fast, the
older drive may not boot properly.
I remember taking a copy of 80 Microcomputing and
applying the patches from it (with SuperZAP) to a copy
of TRS-DOS to make it 40 track, and to speed up the
drive step. The system booted up MUCH faster.
Boy, those were the days...
Al
> I will say this about you Al, you do consistently
> trumpet the bullies logic and the administrations
> spin without embarassment. You would have fit in
> very comfortably with the US supporters of Nazi
> Germany. Thankfully your type is still a minority
> at this time in the US.
>
> Lawrence
I'm sorry but none of the above is true.
Unlike the Clinton adminstration there is no spin
here.
It's all the truth, and policy based on hundreds of
years of human history observed.
You should be ashamed of resorting to trick of
comparing me, Bush or ANYONE to Nazi Germany, or
Germans (I am also of German descent, and proud of
that. Though not proud of Germany in the beginning
years of the 20th Century). It's just low.
Luckly, I don't take it personally because it's on the
same level (and as funny to me) as "Yo Momma!"
And I'm NOT in the minority. Given the approval rating
for the war, AND the President I'm in the majority.
Though Liberals would like Conservatives to think they
are kooks and marginalized in the population.
The truth is, that we're not.
Thanks anyway.
Al
Hello John
How are you. Sorry for late writing. I was out of
station for last couple of days only today I joined my
work.
John I am unlucky I do not have the Kermit S/W in my
winchester disk.
Is it necessary to load any communication S/W like
Kermit in the winchester disk, because I also can not
load any S/W in my winchester disk. Now I think I am
in trouble.
Fortunately I also have VanDyke's CRT404 with me & I
can load this in my WINnt PC.
======================================================
> Then, find the
> file(s) you want, and use the RSK 'type' command to
> list them to the port
> you are attached (logically and physically) to. Use
> your terminal
> program's "logging" or "screen capture" function,
> and... there you are!
=====================================================
Sorry please I could not understand your avobe
sentence.
What you mean by
""""use the RSK 'type' command to list them to the
port
you are attached (logically and physically) to. Use
your terminal program's "logging" or "screen capture"
function,""""
Could you please tell me the process/commands in
detail how to use this software & which is the
sutiable cable (RS232) to link these two PC's.
It would be great help from you side.
Best regards
Kishore
--- John Lawson <jpl15(a)panix.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, nk badoni wrote:
>
> > Hello John
> >
> > Thank you very much for your kind reply.
> >
> > Yes it is a complete system.
>
> Ah... this makes the process *much* easier! A
> bit of info now would
> be: what is the model of your DEC system? (ie PDP
> 11/23, VAX 11/750,
> PRO350... etc)
>
> >
> > I have checked Kermit but I could not find this
> S/W
> > there. Might be my process was wrong.
>
>
> Hmmm... a lot of RSX systems had Kermit as part
> of the Distribution
> Kit.. you can try:
>
> MCR> DIR kerm*.*,*
>
> but if your disk is big and you CPU slow, this can
> take upto an hour to
> complete.
>
>
> OR, you can use a Terminal Emulating program on
> your Wintel machine (I
> use VanDyke's CRT on my IBM Thinkpad running Win2K).
> Then, find the
> file(s) you want, and use the RSK 'type' command to
> list them to the port
> you are attached (logically and physically) to. Use
> your terminal
> program's "logging" or "screen capture" function,
> and... there you are!
> The files are safe on your PC. (This assumes you
> have a multi-port set of
> serial terminal connectors attached to the computer.
> This procedure can
> also be done using the PC terminal emulator attached
> to the DEC system
> console port. The object is to list the files as an
> ASCII stream and
> capture that listing on the PC's HD.
>
>
> This will work with any storage media on your DEC
> computer, HDs or
> Floppies, by the way.
>
> Please write to the classiccmp list during this
> process, and we will all
> try to help out as much as possible.
>
> I will also forward this correspondence to the
> List.
>
> Cheers
>
> John
I am looking for a functioning Data Pheripheral DP100 8 inch
removeable disk drive. Any ideas where I might find one?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Debbie
Hi All,
Today I spent driving up and down to a place that had a bunch of
interesting stuff for me. Amongst others, some VAX 4000 stuff, a
truckload of DSSI disks, and: some StorageWorks stuff.
The haul included two HSCZ40C controller cabs, cables, and several
(empty) BA356-JC storage cabs. I still have a bunch of RZ28's in
their SW trays, so plugged them in, for fun.
Everything seems to be alive, I could use some docs on this,
though.. esp. the HSZ40C controller, which obviously needs to be
configured through its [unknown pinout] serial port...
Thx,
Fred
I have a Visual Commuter laptop which I purchased new and still works. It's
stored securely in a closet. Unfortunately, I didn't purchased a LCD
display for it. Would you by chance know where I may purchased an LCD?
Hi all,
See subject..
They're fine... just got word from John that although he's
extremely busy, he's OK. Site was down since the last time
his ISP rebooted (fri 14th) which indeed was caused by the
storm. He'll check in on the site.
Thanks for noticing!
Cheers,
Fred
Could the many who post from their digest downloads
please put the subject in their replies ? This makes it
much easier to use my delete button and not have to read
the things I'm not interested in. I don't think that's too
much to ask. I'm sure that would make Jay or Jeffries task
much easier also. Not all of us receive in digest form.
Lawrence
lgwalker@ mts.net
> Roger Merchberger wrote:
> You mean, citing war on others despite (or because
> of) the #1 commandment of most [all?] Christian
> faiths: "Thou shalt not kill."
> Despite 2000 years of trying, Christianity (in all
> it's flavors) is still not the dominant faith of
> this planet... Any chance there's a reason for that
Did you ever bother to get the data?
http://www.religioustolerance.org/worldrel.htm
Since your premise is wrong, I'll let you decide
whether your conclusion is too....
Thanks for playing!
Al
All,
Yay... DEC's rigidness in how things Should Be Done did not
disappoint me again... the DS300 was in password protection
mode. I cleared it with the usual procedure, and am now
able to configure it... which is almost as painless as it
was with the DS200's I have !
(*just with TCP/IP added ;-) *)
Thanks to all who have helped/responded!
Now, back to the usual political BS we read here..
--fred
All,
Yeah, well... part of the fun was getting the consoles tied together
using a DECserver 300. The thing works, boots, loads the software,
and then... BANG. Dumps me into a very unwilling mode that just
gives me a # prompt, and then wants me to guess.
Anyone have the (pdf?) docs on this beast? I assumed it would be a
thing similar to the 200, but oh, was i wrong...
--f
One last riposte for these supposed "patriots".
FEMA was brought in by the Reagan-Bush administrations and
now Junior has extended the rights to suspend the rights
enshrined in the US constitution by the founding fathers who
could never have imagined the rapacity of the present bandits.
Check out
http://www.sonic.net/sentinel/gvcon6.html
or if you want a real example of the big sell even extended to your
kids
www.fema.gov/kids/
But of course there is no brainwashing going on in the US of
The New World Order.
Or if you are even capable of reading something other than
spin-doctored news-clips, read " The Praetorian Guard" by
John Stockwell, the highest-ranking CIA officer ever to quit the
agency and expose the truth of it's operations to Congressional
investigators, if the book hasn't been "disappeared" by the
State Department. You might even re-examine the positions of
the "discredited" former US Attorney-General Ramsey Clarke.
Enough of this BS, I'd rather ignore the parroting rabble and go
back to figuring out the workings of "non-computer" micros and
even "non-computer" DEC micros. I shut ma mouth...
Lawrence
lgwalker@ mts.net
Thanks Eric,
I'll take your word for it since I haven't looked at an Apple 1
schematic for about twenty-five years! That may have been another reason
I didn't put video on my board!
Bryan
Eric Smith wrote:
>Your Apple 1 homebrew page is interesting, but the details about
>Woz's design aren't quite correct. The Apple 1 did use 4K multiplexed
>address DRAMs (typ. MK4096) for the main memory. But the video memory
>was entirely separate, and consisted of seven Signetics 2504 1Kbit
>dynamic shift registers and a Signetics 2519 hex 40-bit shift register.
>The video memory recirculated constantly, so it didn't need any explicit
>refresh circuitry.
>
>It wasn't until the Apple 2 design that Woz shared the main memory with
>the display to get automatic DRAM refresh.
>
>Best regards,
>Eric Smith
I received my EMC2 Orion SSD today... I have to say I'm impressed, it
definately is what we'd considering "Enterprise" these days...
The unit is, according to its manuals, 31.4" x 33.3" x 11.5", and weighs
roughly 275lbs.
The Orion has some nine slots in what looks like (but isn't) a full-size
3-connector VME bus cardcage. It has one "Director" (controller) card, and
five 64MB memory cards installed (320MB). In the rear of the unit is one
Maxtor 320MB SCSI disk, for offline backup, and two sealed lead-acid
batteries (So that in an emergency power off situation the unit can back
itself up to the internal SCSI disk and not lose data).
Pictures are available:
http://www.kiwigeek.com/hjp/comps/emc2_orion.html
Now all I need is an IBM that can read from a IBM 3370/3380 DASD - which
is what the Orion emulates...
JP
> From: Mike <kenziem(a)sympatico.ca>
>
> So then why not demand that all countires with
> weapons of mass destruction disarm?
Because none of those countries attacked three of it's
neighbors using them, were forcibly expelled from a
neigboring country and agreed to disarm as part of the
surrender agreement.
We have not picked Iraq out a hat to disarm them.
They asked to be disarmed when they used their weapons
against their neighbors AND their own people (Northern
Kurds).
> Why not start with those that have actually used
> them in the past.
Name some... And I mean a country that has used WoMD
in an offensive manner without provocation.
> And not applied randomly. There are many other UN
> sanctions that are being ignored or have been
> vetoed.
Not that are on the same level as the one Iraq is
flouting.
> He claims to have done just that and the arms
> inspectors have not been able to find anything.
> If the US has been concealing the evidence of this
> then they are as guilty as he is.
Did you not listen to the same presentation of Hans
Blix that I did?
He stated that not only did they find things, they
found more things than Iraq reported. They found Iraq
had developed weapons with a greater range, and in
amounts in excess of the agreements.
What is stunning for any intelligent person, is that
he then followed that by saying he saw no problem with
Iraq and that they were following the agreement.
He basically said they WEREN'T in compliance, but that
is was not a problem for him.
> Because in most countries the police require proof
> before an arrest and then there is a trial before
> an execution. The police do not stop you on the
> street demand proof of your innocence claim you are
> lying and shoot you.
There was such a thing, vis-a-vis Iraq. It was called
the Invasion of Kuwait and the bombing of Israel with
Scud missiles...
What is happening now is of a piece with that. When we
booted them out of Kuwait, they agreed to disarm as
part of the surrender. They have not been keeping
their word.
They are in breach of their obligations, AND have been
continuing to develop illegal weapons.
Al
Hah!
Now *that* is on-topic banter! :)
*saving info for later*
Thanks!
--f
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher McNabb [mailto:cmcnabb@4mcnabb.net]
> Sent: zondag 23 februari 2003 4:30
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: power (ups) systems
>
>
> On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 22:18, Fred N. van Kempen wrote:
>
> > My real question:
> >
> > These UPSes have 3 load segments each. On the Compaq, I currently
> > use *2*. Is this the reason for its screaming? Does the total
> > load come from the three segments?
> >
>
> Fred, I'm betting the Compaq UPS is rated for 800VA per load segment.
> If this is true, then that means you are trying to supply 1650VA from
> two segments, which are rated for a total of 1600VA. Try
> moving some of
> the load to the third segment and see what happens.
>
> --
> Christopher L McNabb
> Operating Systems Analyst Email: cmcnabb(a)4mcnabb.net
> Virginia Tech ICBM: 37.1356N 80.4272N
> GMRS: WPSR255 ARS: N2UX Grid Sq: EM97SD
All,
While rewiring the VAX Lab here, I found something weird is going
on with the power usage on the network.
First, some stats:
UPS 1: 2400VA, mains load 220VAC (Compaq)
UPS 2: 2200VA, mains load 220VAC (APC)
All power is 220VAC, 50Hz, single phase. Regular European power,
so to speak. No weirdness there. The Compaq UPS is connected to
the Compaq servers and related (MicroWalt Corp) equipment. This
is the PROD network.
The APC (new in town) is for the VAX stuff and related equipment,
and powers all of that. For now, an 4100, a 3100 and some hub/
router/DECserver et al equipment.
Here comes the fun part. All this *used* to be on the Compaq UPS,
and it was fine, just at 96% of its load.
Now that things are split out... the compaq screams even *more* at
me, even though its reported load is ~1650VA.
My real question:
These UPSes have 3 load segments each. On the Compaq, I currently
use *2*. Is this the reason for its screaming? Does the total
load come from the three segments?
Call me stupid, this I cant figure it out. I probably should not be
doing this at 4am :)
Cheers,
Fred
> No, I'm one of "those people" who sees no logic
> whatsoever in going to war with Iraq. I don't want
> to say that those in favor are stupid, but those in
> favor are dumb.
What's great about people like you Sellam, is that
every time you think something like this, you get to
have egg on your face when it turns out wonderful.
I remember all the doom and gloom and naysayers, and
the predictions of thousands of bodybags for the
Afghanistan War on Terrorism a year and half ago.
People thought that those in favor of that were dumb
too...
I am not someone who loves war. But, I am someone who
believes in backing up rules, laws, and civilization
with penalties when the rules are broken or in the
case of Hussein, not only broken but flouted.
It will be over fairly quickly once it starts, and as
before (in 1981) it will be a rout.
But, this time we will take Hussein out of power and
set the people in Iraq free. Iran is probably next on
the President's list, and then North Korea. Unless Kim
Jong Il pushes to be the next in line and won't wait
his turn.
It's so wasteful for people like Hussein, Il and the
leadership in Iran to do the kind of things that cause
this, rather than dedicating themselves to providing
the best possible lives and economy for their people.
Since we still have people here in the U.S. who think
ideaology is more important than doing the right
thing, I'm not surprised there are similar people
elsewhere...
I hope the human race outgrows that someday...
It's ok for you to think people in favor of taking
Hussein out are stupid.... It only means you don't
have a clue what it's all about...
Hopefully getting egg on your face a few more times
will make you tired of being wrong...
Al
> It's marked T2000B Exerciser.
It is for the T series disc drives (T40 -> T300)
Not of much use unless you have one of these. Did you get the whole suitcase
or just the T2000 ?
My wife talked me into stopping at a thrift today and in the electrical area
under some stuff I found a Amstrad PPC640. Not able to test it yet not
enough "C" batteries. :-(
Hello Sridhar,
> We shouldn't have tried to prevent it because it's none of our business.
> I think Cuba is worse off with Castro, but it just simply isn't our place
> to change that. That is for the people of Cuba to do.
We were genuinely worried about Castro's wanting to have nukes only
90 miles offshore of the US mainland. Right or wrong, it was a real danger
we wanted not to have happen.
Best Regards
At 01:38 AM 2/22/03 -0500, you wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Chad Fernandez wrote:
>
> > So your basically an isolationist, then? Sounds like many of the people
> > here are.
>
>If by isolationist you mean that I believe we shouldn't be projecting our
>collective penis into everyone else's affairs, then yes, I am an
>isolationist. However, I don't believe that's the proper meaning of the
>term.
>
> > I don't know much about many of items on your list, However.
> >
> > > 1961 : The U.S. attempts to overthrow the revolutionary Cuban
> > > government at the Bay of Pigs.
> >
> > This ones interests me...... are you saying Cuba is better off, now that
> > Castro is in power, and we shouldn't have tried to prevent that?
>
>We shouldn't have tried to prevent it because it's none of our business.
>I think Cuba is worse off with Castro, but it just simply isn't our place
>to change that. That is for the people of Cuba to do.
>
>Peace... Sridhar
Can we please end the endless, mindless discussion and get back to
'puters. I'm getting really tired of all of the anti-this and anti-that BS.
No wonder so many people have signed off this list.
James
--
http://webpages.charter.net/jrice54/classiccomp2.html
> HI:
>
> I am looking for a 5 1/4" floppy drive for a TRS-80.
> The cable would be great too! Please let me know
> the cost. Thank you.
>
> Sorry about my posting yesterday asking for a 1
> 1/4" drive. It was a typo.
That's fine, but you still haven't provided the
specific information about WHICH TRS-80 you needed a
drive and cable for...
That's like asking for a drive and cable for an Apple
Computer...
Please be more specific, and I'm sure there are lots
of people on this list who could be of help to you.
To repeast someone else's request:
- What kind of TRS-80 is it?
- Do you need an internal or external drive (i.e.: a
Model III or IV can use both)
- Do you need a case and power supply?
- Do you need a 35 or 40 track drive? Or do you need
an 80 Track Drive (mostly determined by the model, and
the type of disks you want to read).
If you can be more specific, those of us willing can
be of more help..
Thanks!
Al
Hi Bruce:
When you say that the telex machines used a "high-voltage DC, 60mA current
loop," is that implying a 120V loop as in standard TTYs? The reason I ask
is that the "private-wire" current loop for an M32/33 is a max of something
like 45 volts on the loop supply. I presume then, that the telex interface
box was designed for the HV, 60-mil telex loop, and then in turn drove the
internal 20-mil input to the selector-magnet-driver card of the M32. Was
this telex interface box in the M32 stand?
I had not heard of later M32s having Telex Line Adapters for FSK modem
application. How can you identify which interface an M32 has? Was there a
different dialer CCU, like the one with six pushbuttons used on the twx 33s?
I have some additional telex info from other folks added below.
ps: Bruce, did you see the post about all those TTY machines for free in
Seattle? Lots of good stuff headed for the dump.
gil
-------------------------------------------------
More telex info from George Hutchison:
Using a Teletype Corporation equipped telex machine on RTTY is relatively
easy.
You need a loop supply with a current limiting resistor (2K or so
wirewound pot) a double-pole double-throw switch, and the telex machine.
Connect the DPDT switch in the standard manner for reversing polarity.
Feed the loop supply (Such as one would find in a 28 LESU) through the pot
to the center terminals of the switch.
Wire the reversing terminals of the switch to the telex machine input
cable/terminals.
If you plug the telex machine into 110 VAC, with the loop supply
de-energized, it will run open. Some folks tweek the dial on the telex a
bit to get the machine to lock up, but this is not necessary.
Energize the loop supply. Depending upon the position of the DPDT Switch,
the machine will either stop running open, remain on and be ready to type
uponst, or will shutdown and the motor will stop. Flipping the switch will
result in the opposite condition to occur. With the machine energized and
the loop locked, set the loop current for 60 ma.
When the machine is on and ready to type, it will key the loop that is
coming from the loop supply. From there it is easy to use it to key
another machine, a transmitter, or what have you.
When the machine is in the off condition, motor shutdown, etc, depressing
the "LOCAL" button on the telex will cause it to come to life so you can
type locally.
I have an ST-6 that I removed the 110VAC that goes through the motor
control relay, and set it up with the reversing arrangement as described.
Most ST-6 motor control relays were DPDT. The loop current from the ST-6
goes through the motor control/now reversing relay, so when the ST-6 says
turn on the motor, the loop current flips polarity and turns on the telex
machine. Such a deal.
Thought some of you might like this bit of info.
73,
George, W7KSJ
-------------------------------------------------
More telex info from Don Robert House:
I have always just used the loop rather than tapping into the SMD
circuitry. I set a loop supply of 120-130 vdc to 62.5 milliamps with
two machines wired in series into the loop. The machines usually
have a mounting cord on them for this purpose.
The M32, if it is a former Telex, it uses the ITA2 version of Baudot
code. It is a 7.00 unit code with 1 start bit and 1 stop bit, which
is 50 baud and 67 words per minute.
-------------------------------------------------
More telex info from Jim Haynes:
There are two Telex interfaces to the M32. One is neutral, and the
other is a polar adapter that plugs into the neutral one.
Look in the Western Union Technical Review CD ROM; I think it's all
documented in there.
And yes, it's 50 baud, 7.5 unit code.
-------------------------------------------------
More telex info from Wayne LeTourneau:
Most Telex's are 66 WPM, I have 60WPM gears in mine and I connect the local
loop to terminals 8 & 9 in the rear. Local loop set at 60ma and not to
exceed 100 VDC.
It copies fine, I'M using a Flesher 170 tu. It also has automatic caridge
return and automatic line feed, so can copy those RTTY stations that are
using computers and don't have enough sense to send a LF and CR at the
right time.
I cannot get mine to talk to itself yet, have not figured out how to get
the keyboard in series with the printer.
Actually, the selector Magnets on thease draw close to 500ma, so you have
to use the driver card, which is where terminals 8 & 9 end up.
Wayne WB0CTE
-------------------------------------------------
>From: "Bruce Lane" <kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com>
>
> Now I'm glad I spent those years with Western Union's Field Service
division (when they still had one), fixing those things.
>
> The Model 32 Telex machine did not operate on a standard phone line. It
required a dedicated hookup to a specially-equipped Western Union central
office. The normal interface was high-voltage DC, 60mA current loop. In the
case of longer-than-typical cable pair length, a polar adapter was employed
to create a differential DC interface.
>
> The later Model 32's were equipped with TLA's (Telex Line Adapters) which
used FSK, as you've already guessed. I don't recall the frequencies
involved exactly, but 2200/2000Hz Mark/Space wants to stick in my head for
some reason.
>
> The Telex network, as far as I know, is long dead in the United States,
and some other of the more industrialized countries, replaced pretty much
by the Internet and FAXes. The Telex-ready Model 32's ran at around 67WPM
(Words per Minute)/50 baud. Amateur Radio RTTY standard calls for
60WPM/45.5 baud.
>
> In other words, you've got yourself a true museum piece there. You may be
able to, if you wanted, convert it for ham radio use. However, you would
need to change the motor gearing to bring the speed down a notch. Finding
the necessary gear would be an adventure at best, though I can suggest a
couple of possible sources if you want to try this.
>
> Enjoy!
>
>Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
>Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
>ARS KC7GR (Formerly WD6EOS) since 12-77 -- kyrrin(a)bluefeathertech.com
;-----------------------------------------------------------
; vaux electronics, inc. 480-354-5556
; http://www.vauxelectronics.com (fax: 480-354-5558)
;-----------------------------------------------------------
Wow !
Tony, could you send some photos of your disk drive ?
I'd like to see this "mystical" thing ! :)
The 24" platters of IBM's RAMAC are known to me but 36" platters ???
Who could have built such disk drives ? Any ideas of the company ?
Pierre
> > In about 1976 University of Missouri Bioengineering Program acquired an "IBM
> > surplus image system" from somebody "unknown" out west. They sent a couple
>
> [...]
>
> > There were two clamshell halves that were opened to access the platter, each
> > track had a fixed head over it. Stored on each track was the image on a
> > single display station. By switching between tracks you could access
> > different images. There was a vacuum pump to remove the air if you opened
> > the clamshells to adjust the heads. Each of the display stations had an
> > integrated keyboard and a proximity or optical pen to select menu items.
>
> One of the peripherals I have for my PDP11s is a PPL model 121 display
> system.
>
> It uses a magnentic disk to store the video images. I think it rotates
> once per field (the motor speed is electronically controlled with an eddy
> current brake IIRC). Images are stored using analogue FM modulation on 3
> tracks of the disk (one for each of R, G, B). There are several sets of
> fixed heads which can be selected so you can store several images on the
> disk and display them.
>
> The disk is a lot smaller than the ones described here, though. I've not
> taken the HDA apat (for obvious reasons), but it looks to be a normal 14"
> platter. The HDA fits, disk horizontal, into a normal 19" rack module.
> There's a separate PSU rack module, and a cardcage of electronics. It
> connects to the Unibus via a DR11B interface I think.
>
> -tony
______________________________________________________________________________
Keine Lust, immer Ihre Adressdaten in eine E-Mail zu schreiben? Mit der
vCard ist Schluss damit! Infos - http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021153
I just received a new board set for my VAX 11/750, which includes
an L0004 to replace the one I had before, which would send output
to the console, but wouldn't read input from the console. Now, however,
when I put in the new L0004, it prints garbage on the console. What's
more,
the _old_ L0004 doesn't print anything on the console anymore. Any
ideas?
TIA,
John W.
Hi, I have just bought a nice clean TELEX machine, it's a TTY-32, 5-level
coding,
with what looks like a phone line hookup, dial-type phone.
I wonder if anybody knows what the modem standard is for this, and/or any
phone number I could call to test this thingy out!
Thanks,
George
Patrick -
I dug out my Votrax manual (1982), and can give you the voltages:
Pins 1-3, 26 VAC, 180 ma
Pin 2, 20 VDC, 50 ma
Pin 4 is 0 volt reference
Unfortunately I don't have a PS for mine either.
Be careful if you find a PS from the Votrax Type 'N Talk. It also has the 5
pin DIN, but it puts out:
Pins 2-4, 19.8 VDC, .35A
Pins 1-3, 17.0 VAC, 1.0A
I do have a working TNT, and it is cool!
Also, the DIP switch configuration on the PSS: (1 is up, 0 is down)
1-3 baud rate: 000 - 9600
100 - 4800
010 - 2400
110 - 1200
001 - 600
101 - 300
011 - 150
111 - 75
4 up - xon/xoff for serial port
4 down - rts
5 - unused
6 up - power-up message spoken
6 down - power-up message not spoken
7 up - parallel port used as input port
7 down - serial port used as input port
8 up - self-test - continuously performs diagnostic test - no access to PSS
in this mode
8 down -normal operating condition
Bob Stek
Saver of Lost Sols
Hey,
Here's one for the Military members, and taxpayers, of the list ...
>from the "serial killer", "dick", "genital lice" that we are here in
Virginia ...
The Navy recently needed some Ariel Hydra Plus DSP boards and
contacted me about them. They mentioned also searching eBay.
Well, I ended up seeing some at ...
Ariel Hydra VME single board DSP computer
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=162&item=2302043683
I talked to the seller and he thought he had a thousand dollar reserve on them.
I told him, no, no reserve, just $500 opening bid.
He had made a mistake listing it and ended the auction because of his mistake.
I couldn't buy them. My buying budget couldn't cover $1000 boards that I wasn't
sure were even going to be the right part ( minor difference in last digit
of part
number) and I'm not an extraordinarily strong player.
But I gave the client the seller's phone number, and seems they may have
had possibilities.
Response from client ...
> Bennett:
> Will do. The boards on Ebay do not have the VSB option that we ideally
require, however these boards still may > be workable. We are researching
to find out what the slightly different part number denotes. We are still
> interested in any additional leads you may be able to find. Thanks for
your work on this!
I still want to follow up and see if this worked out.
Wish I could have made a little to cover my bills, but didn't seem doable
on this one.
But I might have saved you all a lot of money, and might have solved a
national need.
Can't post client contact info though. Having anyone pestering my clients
would be a no no.
But, might have built up the karma level. Right now I might see the light
at the end
of the tunnel on a project for the Saudi government. ( They are our allies ).
Also just donated a chassis to Cornell University ...
http://wwwapps.ups.com/etracking/tracking.cgi?TypeOfInquiryNumber=T&Inquiry…
With chassis, you can't get enough for them to make them worth packaging
and shipping.
So my terms were the mailing center had to do it. Plus I didn't have
suitable materials.
Used to wish we could bring some of you with us, but you made it seem
better to go it alone.
Incidently, with the situation overseas, the US military and many defense
contractors
are currently re-evaluating their spares levels.
Best Regards
Mark, I followed your thread about troubleshooting your monitor. I have a
warehouse in Melbourne Florida with some good and probably some bad VT320's
on the shelves. If you zero in on a bad part or suspect something as bad and
would like to replace it send me an email and if I can pull one from a unit
here it's yours for the cost of shipping.
regards,
thom
hello,
I recently inherited an IBM 3151 terminal, but no keyboard! As some of you
may know, this terminal used a keyboard with an RJ-45 jack on it.
I have been able to find pinouts of both the terminal keyboard connector and a
regular AT style keyboard. I connected all the wires appropriatly, but no
go. The terminal still says "Problem in keyboard".
so, two questions.
1) is it even possible to use an AT or PS/2 keyboard with a 3151 terminal?
2) if so, how?
ps, I am not subscribed, so please cc to me.
thanks,
jason pepas
BAU; reply to original author.
---------- Begin forwarded message ----------
From: Mohammad Asim Khan <masimk2003(a)yahoo.com>
Date: Friday, February 21, 2003, 8:49:20 AM
Subject: Required 8" Floppy Drive
I need of Following 8" Floppy Drive. Please send me the detail and price of
it.
Model FDD-412 A Hitachi,
Capacity 1.6 MB HHT
24v / 5v
Thanks
Mohamamd Asim Khan
masimk2003(a)yahoo.com
---------- End forwarded message ----------
--
Jeffrey Sharp
> Er, I don't think the modem was invented in late 50's.
>
While U.S. Robotics did not invent the modem, they were one of the first
companies to sell them for home use. Here are some U.S. Robotics data sheets
that I got in February 1978.
http://www.swtpc.com/mholley/USR/USR_Modem.htm
I don't want to argue about who was first to sell a modem. I just think it
is neat that U.S. Robotics is still around and I have these data sheets
Michael Holley
www.swtpc.com/mholley
Thanks to Jay West for providing the web servers for www.swtpc.com.