> For me, at least, the hard part of designing a modern Qbus and/or
> Unibus interface would be what to select for bus drivers.
Well, for Qbus...there's an appendix in the KA630 document that's
titled "Q22-Bus Specification". Based on that:
>From the looks of it, for a driver you can use almost any
open-collector TTL output - at least, a quick look at the specs doesn't
reveal anything that stands out as incompatible.
The receivers are a bit more interesting. The spec says that their
threshold must be between 1.3 and 1.7 volts and that their high-level
input current must be no greater than 80?A; it fails to give any limits
on how much current they source into a low-level input, though there
surely must be such a limit. Are there any bus receiver chips that
have a reference-voltage pin, which could be connected to (say) 1.5V?
Basically, a bunch of specialized voltage comparators?
Personally, I'd be tempted to just use TTL and see if it works (LSTTL,
probably, since that sources less current into low-level inputs). But
of course "it works for me" isn't good enough if you're designing for
other people's use.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Ethan Dicks <dickset(a)amanda.spole.gov> wrote:
> Yes, but some devices are not so old and _do_ use ASICs. There are some
> peripherals that came out at the same time as the 11/20 (~1970) that
> they are made up of several square feet of TTL/Linear chips.
Well, what I meant was that UNIBUS and Q-bus were designed to be implementable
without ASICS using only discrete logic, and the simpler devices were
implemented that way.
> Unibus? 8640, 8641, 340, 8881, DC013 (custom DEC chip)
> Qbus? DC003, DC004, DC005, DC006, DC010, 74LS240, 8837, 8838
>
> In other words, with few exceptions, *not* ordinary TTL chips (though ISTR
> one of their busses used hand-selected 7438s chosen for low (1uA?) leakage.
Hmm, 74LS240 for Q-bus? It's just a standard three-state TTL inverting buffer,
isn't it? For driver, receiver, or both?
> designed-as-such bus drivers/receivers from companies like
> National Semiconductor.
Does NS still make them?
MS
Quick question,
What would folks here be prepared to pay for this machine, particularly as
it's boxed and never been used? It went into the workshop to have a hard
drive fitted shortly after being bought in 1992 or thereabouts and for
whatever reason it sat on a shelf forever thereafter.
Or is the general concensus 'oh it's just a 386SX PC running DOS 5'
Pix at http://www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk/ebay/ibm/ibm.php
cheers
--
Adrian/Witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - possibly the UK's biggest online computer museum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - ex-monthly gothic shenanigans :o(
Hello Friend,
I actually have an old Qube box in my closet. The weird thing is that it doesn't work on any other cable systems, except the old qube system.
My unit used to work when we had the qube system. Once they shut off Qube, the unit no longer works.
I remember these things from when I was a kid, that is why I have kept it.
You know much about how they work? I would like to get this one to work. I have opened the unit, but see nothing wrong that would cause it to power up and then the display goes dead.
Glad to see someone has the same interest in these old things
Can anyone tell me what the BC20K is used on?
Thanks
Cynde
Cynde Moya, MLIS
Archives Cataloguer
Vulcan Inc.
www.vulcan.com
Office Tel. 206-223-4901
Mobile Tel. 206.369.3205
Fax. 206-223-4207
Hmm,
well u know what, the system programmers i guess use
the right side of their brain, while the admins use
their left.
i guess, as an admin, u need to look at individual
problems and try to solve them with a more logical and
rational approach
while, a programmer would have to use his creativity,
and intuition to be able to "design" programs/SWs.
and,
i'm neither of them, so no bias here!!!
what do u think, curt???
>
>
>
>Message: 1
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:17:33 -0800
From: Ernest <ernestls(a)comcast.net>
Subject: System programmers vs. administrators
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <1074320253.1586.16.camel@ernest>
Content-Type: text/plain
I was having a discussion with a friend earlier
tonight about
programming, and how I've never been the least bit
interested in
learning how to program -I'm convinced that I have a
mental block
against it, or something like that.
As the discussion progressed, we decided that there
are two types of
advanced computer users -system programmers and system
administrators.
That in itself is debatable but where our discussion
became bogged down
was when we tried to decide which user was left brain,
and which was
right brain.
We started by agreeing that programmers are artists,
while the
administrators are more scientific. But then, as we
talked, we decided
that you could make the same arguement for each side.
So, I thought I would throw the discussion out here,
and see what you
guys think. Assuming that there really are two types
of computer users
-programmers and administrators- which side is left
brain thinking, and
which is right brain thinking?
I pulled the following off some psycho-babble website:
Experimentation has shown that the two different
sides, or hemispheres,
of the brain are responsible for different manners of
thinking. The
following table illustrates the differences between
left-brain and
right-brain thinking:
Left Brain:
Logical
Sequential
Rational
Analytical
Objective
Looks at parts
Right Brain:
Random
Intuitive
Holistic
Synthesizing
Subjective
Looks at wholes
Most individuals have a distinct preference for one of
these styles of
thinking. Some, however, are more whole-brained and
equally adept at
both modes. In general, schools tend to favor
left-brain modes of
thinking, while downplaying the right-brain ones.
Left-brain scholastic
subjects focus on logical thinking, analysis, and
accuracy.
Right-brained subjects, on the other hand, focus on
aesthetics,
feeling,
and creativity.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 12:19:54 -0500
From: "Curt vendel" <curt(a)atarimuseum.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Apple 'Star Trek'?
To: <freddyboomboom(a)comcast.net>, "General Discussion:
On-Topic and
Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <000601c3dd1e$211f6990$1a02a8c0@starship1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hmmmm....
D/L'ing now... curious to check this out :-)
I have a Mac OS X 10.2 Server running in my office, so
I'm curious to
see
how these interact...
Curt
________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Hi folks,
Has anyone got a spare 2.5mm 12V DC power socket that's PCB mounted? The one
I'm replacing looks exactly like these:
http://tinyurl.com/2mhkrhttp://tinyurl.com/3gtau
I can only get 'em in packs of 10 and I don't really want to buy 10!
Cheers all!
--
Adrian/Witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - possibly the UK's biggest online computer museum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - ex-monthly gothic shenanigans :o(
> The receivers are a bit more interesting. The spec says that their
> threshold must be between 1.3 and 1.7 volts and that their high-level
> input current must be no greater than 80?A;
> Are there any bus receiver chips that have a reference-voltage pin,
> which could be connected to (say) 1.5V?
You can use open drain CMOS buffers/inverters in this way by setting
the supply volts to give the desired ViH point (check the data sheet
but ViH * 2 is about right). The outputs are at least TTL volts
tolerant used like this.
Lee.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
> I also can't be the only Outlook 2000 user here, can I?
You're not, I'm stuck with it here at work.
Anyone want to check my message to see if the redundant
"Reply-To:" is there
> I wonder how.....
I don't, because fixing software here has become a summary
dismissal offence. 8^(=
Cheers,
Lee.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
On Jan 20, 0:54, Witchy wrote:
> Bearing in mind a lot of mailing software ignores the 'from' field
and
> instead uses the 'reply-to' field instead. Well, OK, for USENET
anyway :)
Well, anything that replies is *supposed* to ignore the "From:" field
*if* (and only if) there is a "Reply-To:". The "From:" is mandatory,
the "Reply-To:" is optional. There are some other headers that may be
involved but only for errors and control messages.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jan 20, 0:34, Jules Richardson wrote:
> Well hang on.. surely it's legal protocol-wise for witchy to put the
> reply-to field in the header for email that he sends, even though the
> from: field is also present and valid?
The "Reply-To:" field is supposed to override the "From:" field, and
although the standard doesn't expressly forbid setting both the same,
it makes it clear that there is no point unless they're different.
> Isn't it a little quirky for the list software to append to any
existing
> reply-to field rather than overwriting it? (which for a mailing list
> might seem more sensible).
Not really, the standard implies that appending is correct behaviour,
in case replies direct to the originator should not go to the
originator's address as given in the "From:" field (eg suppose Witchy
sent a message from somewhere other than his normal address, or a
machine that didn't have a valid address; the "From:" would show the
not-normal point of origin, the "Reply-to: would show his normal
address).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jan 19, 16:24, Brad Parker wrote:
>
> der Mouse wrote:
> ...
> >Once, years ago, I was involved in building a designed-on-the-spot
Qbus
> >board.
>
> Which raises a question I've been meaning to ask.
[...]
> Seems like a 4 layer board with gold fingers would work - the few
boards
> I've handled seemed pretty thick, however. I'm guessing the
thickness
> needs to be correct.
Small variations shouldn't matter. I've not noticed any Unibus boards
being abnormally thick.
> I have not (yet) looked at a unibus card schematic - would be it hard
to
> create a bus master IDE interface?
>
> Is a unibus controller a relatively straight forward TTL design ?
Dunno about the DMA -- probably not hard -- but the rest is
straightforward.
> And, if I did manage to create a realiable IDE interface, would
anyone
> else want one?
For low enough cost, yes, me!
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
On Jan 19, 23:03, Witchy wrote:
> > It *is* your mailer. It appears to be putting an unneccessary
> > "Reply-to:" header in, and when the list software sets its
"Reply-To:",
> > it gets concatenated to yours instead of replacing it:
>
> I know microsloth stuff has a mind of its own, but if I've not
changed
> anything since well before pre-upgrade days and both my 'from' and
> 'reply-to' addresses are the same what more can I do?
But you don't need a "Reply-to:" if it's the same as the "From:" and it
shouldn't really be there unless it's diifferent.
> I'll have a nose through the options, but I doubt 'include from AND
reply-to
> address when replying to mails' is in there. It's microsloth, what
more can
> I say :)
:-)
I'm fairly sure there's a way to tell it not to include the
"Reply-to:". I'll ask the M$ people at work.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
I've listed (3) DEC VT520 terminals on the Vintage Computer Marketplace.
Search for items #372-374.
I'm asking $25 each. These are fantastic multi-purpose terminals. Check
out the listing descriptions for more information.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Looking for peoples estimate of the value of an ASR-33 with working paper
tape reader/punch (and of course keyboard/print), modem is quite optional.
I am starting to search for one to add to my collection and am not sure what
price range is reasonable these days....
Also if anyone has one that they want to sell (especially if located in
North East US), please contact me directly.
David Corbin
dvcorbin(a)optonline.net
If you need one for your collection, I thought someone might find this
listing of interest.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2781740056
If anyone has any other Berkeley Enterprise items for sale, please let me
know. I would also like to purchase a number of other early computer
artifacts. Any suggestions besides ebay? Can I submit a "want list" to this
group? Thank you for your time.
I was searching around the net for information on Datapoint the other day
and came across information on ARCNET. I never realized ARCNET was still
in wide use today. There is even a 100Mbit version of ARCNET over RG58(!)
Check out the links below for more interesting reading and history of
ARCNET:
http://www.tcpmag.com/archives/article.asp?EditorialsID=58http://www.arcnet.com/abtarc.htm
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
I have a working "no-name" laptop (it doesn't seem to have a brand
name, just "Notebook Computer" on the label) made around 1991.
It's a 486-66 with a whopping 8Mb RAM, 540 Mb hard drive, color
LCD screen, and a PCMCIA 33.6k modem card. It's running Win95
(albeit slowly). It works just fine for email and word processing
but bogs down trying to run Web browsers (not sure if more RAM can
be added or not). The battery pack won't hold a charge for more
than a day or so, and the CMOS battery is dead, but aside from
that everything works fine. I just bought a more modern Dell used
laptop so I no longer need this "classic" ;)
Is anyone interested in purchasing it cheap? Make me an offer...
thanks
Charles
Just a quickie folks,
Does anyone have the power cable pinouts for the Osborne 1 motherboard? Got
one here from Kevan that doesn't boot at all - consistent garbage on the
nice'n'bright screen. Before I start further messing with the beast I want
to make sure it's getting enough juice. Suppose I can always check the CPU
and RAM chips for +5V couldn't I - it's been powered up in this condition in
the past so I'm not going to do any more damage to it :)
Got to dig out my hot glue gun too - in their infinite wisdom they've glued
the mountings for one of the daughterboards onto the motherboard :-/
Cheers!
--
Adrian/Witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - possibly the UK's biggest online computer museum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - ex-monthly gothic shenanigans :o(
Finally cleaning out around the house, started with the PeeCee junk. It's in
a pile next to the trash, let me know if anyone needs any of this, quick, I
want it gone! Cost = Shipping (shipping included) :)
All these are ide hard drives, most all western digital caviars, a couple
quantum & fuji
five 2.0gb
two 2.1gb
three 2.5gb
five 1.6gb
(figured some might want these for SBC6120 projects, probably 95% of these
drives work, one or two may be bad)
CTS 212AH modem - didn't know if this might be old enough to be collectable
Mitsumi CD with non-ide interface card
Several quad speed ide cd's
a 5.25 1.2mb floppy drive
Many misc cards that go in 486 type systems - serial/parallel I/O cards,
sound cards, modems, etc.
On Jan 19, 9:14, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
> So, is there a document anywhere that explains the 'programmatic'
> interface to MSCP-type controllers (or for any particular
controllers)?
> And I'm looking for disk MSCP not TMSCP. Basically, I'd like
something
> that explains the registers, command packets, etc. for hardware like
a
> RQDX3 or KDA50 or...
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated. I tried with little luck on google
> last night to find thist kind of stuff.
What you need is the "UDA50 Prograsmmer's Doc. Kit", QP-905-GZ. It's
not really UDA50-specific; I last used it to figure out what was wrong
with the DU: driver in RT-11 5.01, such that it wouldn't work with an
RQDX3 (DEC didn't follow their own protocol properly, was the answer,
and the bug happened to get past an RQDX1 but not some other
controllers).
Mine is labelled "First Edition April 1982" and consists of:
AA-L619A-TK Ver.1.2 MSCP Basic Disk Functions Manual (approx 170pp)
AA-L620A-TK Storage System Diagnostics and Utility Protocol
( 46pp)
AA-L621A-TK Storage System Unibus Port Description (58pp)
The first deals with MSCP itself; gives an overview, a bit about the
comms side of it, algorithms, message formats, and a subset of commands
for disks. The second deals with DUP, which is what's used for
diagnostics and formatting. The last is about the port driver, which
you can think of as the layer under the class driver (MSCP/DUP).
Has the MSCP patent expired, or do you still need to license it?
And can you get copies from DEC/Compaq/HP, and if not, do they come
under the permission DEC gave to make copies?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Any thought been given to porting PUTR to FreeBSD/Linux/Unix??? Was hoping
to use it but really don't want to install a dos partition on my Unix PC.
Other solutions out there?
Jay
So, is there a document anywhere that explains the 'programmatic'
interface to MSCP-type controllers (or for any particular controllers)?
And I'm looking for disk MSCP not TMSCP. Basically, I'd like something
that explains the registers, command packets, etc. for hardware like a
RQDX3 or KDA50 or...
Any help is greatly appreciated. I tried with little luck on google
last night to find thist kind of stuff.
Pat
--
Purdue University ITAP/RCS
Information Technology at Purdue
Research Computing and Storage
http://www.itap.purdue.edu/rcs/
>From The Register: "Intel and HP find oldest working PC"
(http://www.theregister.com/content/67/34933.html)
"Dutch company PHI DATA yesterday received a € 18,000 prize from Intel, HP
and Dutch IT weekly Computable for still owning and operating a vintage IBM
5160 (Intel 8088) computer from 1983. PHI Data uses the IBM to test matrix
printers. It is now officialy the oldest obsolete-yet-active PC in the Low
Countries."
<snip>
"When Dell ran a contest in the USA back in 1999 for the oldest
small-business PC still in use, the winner was the Altair 8800b. Still
running a 1960 Digital PDP-1 to do your maths? Let us know."
I suspect that a number on this list can do better.
Bob
_________________________________________________________________
There are now three new levels of MSN Hotmail Extra Storage! Learn more.
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=hotmail/es2&ST=1
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:15:27 -0700
From: ben franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
Subject: Re: Emulators of Classic Computers
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <4008C4EF.10003(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
format=flowed
Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner wrote:
> It was thus said that the Great Tony Duell once
stated:
>
>>Steve Ciarcia's bomebrew computers (he did several
-- I remember an
8088
>>system in 5 chips, a sort-of PC compatible, a Z8
board without even
>>thinking about it) were based on microprocessors.
But I do remember a
>>Byte article on making a homebrew CPU (from TTL). I
think it was
called
>>'EGO', and hung off a Tandy 2000.
>
>
> I remember that. I still have the Byte magazines
the EGO appeared
in.
> Neat CPU, made for floating point operations if I
recall.
>
> -spc (Fondly remembers bytes from the mid 80s ...
)
But it was micro programed with EPROMS. Nice idea.
Ben.
hey, can u also fwd me a copy of the 'EGO' article ur
talking about. plss.......
i need it desperately...........
pls......
subs here
________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
If I remember correctly, the MINC-11 is just a Q-bus machine with extra
analog/digital I/O for laboratory work. The standard serial I/O on every
DEC machine I've used has been just 3-wire (recieve,transmit, ground),
XON/XOFF, 9600 baud, no parity, 8 bits. You can use Hyperterm IF you
set it up for software handshaking. If you forget to change it, then
the default is hardware handshaking and hyperterm will appear hung.
the m8012 (BDV-11) has two switches on the edge, halt enable and restart.
Halt enable is used to put it into ODT.
Lights: The green led is power ok. if all 4 red leds are on, then the
system is hung; halt switch or power up mode wrong. At least that is
the message in the interfaces handbook.
Make sure your VT102 is not in local mode, they like to switch to that
sometimes.
Joe Heck
Thanks, seems like when I turned the intensity up on the CIT-101 video
terminal the error was
"checksum error NVR 00" and the error was there, even with the MINC-23 off.
NVRAM in the terminal must be bad.
I replaced the C.ITOH model CIT-101 video terminal with a DIGITAL VT-102, I
get the flashing cursor in the upper left hand corner of the VT-102 with no
errors in NVRAM , but the terminal does not talk to the MINC-23. I am not
familiar with how the MINC communicates to the terminal. I have baud rate
on VT-102 set at 9600 for both RX and TX. I do not see even an echo on my
keystrokes on the VT-102. I have no docs on the terminal or the MINC. Can I
use a PC running hyperterm or procomm to talk with the MINC? The M8012 boot
card has 5 LEDs, red,green,red,red,red and all of them are continuously
illuminated. What are the functions assigned for these LEDs?
Hutch
ard(a)p850ug1.demon.
co.uk (Tony Duell) To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Sent by: cc:
cctech-bounces@cla Subject: Re: DEC MINC-11 question
ssiccmp.org
01/16/2004 06:26
PM
Please respond to
"General
Discussion:
On-Topic Posts
Only"
>
>
>
>
>
> Classic comp lister's,
>
> I have MINC-11 ( seems to be a MINC-23 in a MINC-11 box) with the
The field upgrade from MINC-11 to MINC-23 was basically just swapping the
CPU card. Sounds like somebody (not DEC failed circus?) did this and
didn't change the nameplate.
> following:
> It only has these cards inside:
> M8186 CPU
> M7506 MEM
> M8029 RX02 DISK CONT
> M7954 IEEE CONT
> M8043 4510 MUX Card
> M8012 Boot Card
>
> This was a working unit until recently when I consistantly get
> "checksum error KVR 00" on bootup.
That doesn't sound like a DEC bootstrap message. Are you sure it's coming
>from the MINC and not from whatever you're using as a terminal?
-tony
>From: "John lambert" <cncmedic(a)sbcglobal.net>
>
>JACK --- CHEAP QUICK EPROM ERASER--
> SANYO DENKI GERMICIDAL ULTRAVIOLET LAMP
> NO. G6T5 WITH ADVANCE TRANSFORMER CO. NO. LC-4-8-C
>BALLAST 120 V. AN FS-4 FLOURESENT STARTER. A
>RECEPTACLE TIMER TO CONTROL LENGTH OF TIME LAMP IS ON.
>MOUNT LAMP 2.5 CM ABOVE PROMS LOCATION IN AN ENCLOSED
>LIFT LID BOX. A LIMIT SWITCH ON THE LID TO SHUT LAMP
>OFF WHEN LIFTED. SAFETY MEASURE THAT LAMP WILL BURN
>YOUR RETINA'S. JACK AT ESHOP.
Hi
Actually it doesn't hurt your retina, it damages your
cornea. This frequency of uv doesn't penetrate very far
into the eye. This means that extra care is needed
since it isn't just a matter of looking at the light.
Any direct path from the lamp to the surface of your
eye can cause damage. Most reflected uv light is attenuated
quite a bit and is not as dangerous but one should still
design their box to avoid reflective surfaces like
aluminum. Even though 90% or so is lost, these lights
are intense. Cardboard or conductive foam has about
0% reflections. One can get an idea of the reflected
quantity by placing a piece of 'T'shirt near. It will
glow if hit by the uv.
Dwight
Jay West <jwest(a)classiccmp.org> wrote:
> Also have a bunch of old pc monitors that will be hitting the trash,
> not gonna post those!
If there are any original IBM (not clone) VGA monitors or cards, I would be very
interested, so don't trash those please!
MS
Has anyone seen or do they HAVE the Wyse 9000 multiprocessor chassis? This was
a machine built by Wyse around 1990 that was based on Sequent's bus
technology that was a multi-processor system based on 386's or 486's running
Sys V?
Steve Wilson
OK, using a 1 million gate FPGA to replace a 7400 is
overkill, but it would work
--
Not if the FPGA isn't 5v tolerant.
It isn't very likely that a device produced in five years
will be useful as a replacement for 7400 series logic, much
less in 50.
We've left the days of logic level compatibility behind us
unfortunately. 3.3v logic is even disappearing pretty quickly
now, and that didn't last a decade.
Looking for peoples estimate of the value of an ASR-33 with working paper
tape reader/punch (and of course keyboard/print), modem is quite optional.
I am starting to search for one to add to my collection and am not sure what
price range is reasonable these days....
Also if anyone has one that they want to sell (especially if located in
North East US), please contact me directly.
David Corbin
dvcorbin(a)optonline.net
Looking for peoples estimate of the value of an ASR-33 with working paper
tape reader/punch (and of course keyboard/print), modem is quite optional.
I am starting to search for one to add to my collection and am not sure what
price range is reasonable these days....
Also if anyone has one that they want to sell (especially if located in
North East US), please contact me directly.
David Corbin
dvcorbin(a)optonline.net
I pulled out my Model 100 the other day and discovered that the foam in the
hard case has begun to disintegrate. The hard case is the Radio Shack
original-issue hard case, so the foam is a pretty big size.
I'm sure that others have experienced this already and I was searching for
replacement options that didn't involve gluing together small pieces of foam
to fit the case.
Any thoughts? Has anyone found a foam supplier that can do small quantities?
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
Ok, we took the HDA out of one of the RA81 drives yesterday. The
bearings seem good - no excessive play - and we think the motor
capacitor is fine. Some wear on the motor + HDA spindle pulleys, but the
drive belt has a huge amount of grip so I don't think there's any belt
slip problems.
The front panel lights just indicate a "spin error", whilst the logic
board status LEDs indicate a code of 01 - pointing at the spindle
sensor.
I made sure this was dust-free, but still no joy, so either it has gone
bad or there's a fault with the logic board bolted to the top of the HDA
itself (sensor seems more likely as we have two drives giving the same
symptoms)
The sensor appears to be optical in nature - with four wires (red,
black, yellow and white).
So:
1) Anyone know the connections to the device? If so we'll stick the
output side on a 'scope next weekend and see if it outputs anything (of
course we have no working unit to see what the waveform *should* look
like, grr)
2) There are a couple of unknown-status RL01 and RL02 drives in store.
Long shot, but anyone know if they use the same sensor in any part of
their mechanism so we can do a temporary part swap with a (hopefully
good) unit?
3) Anyone have a RA81 HDA in the UK that's suffered a head crash or
other destruction and may yield a working sensor for us? :-)
cheers
Jules
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh(a)aracnet.com> wrote:
> > I just decided to test a TLZ06 on my system, and it don't want to
> > work. I normally play with an Exabyte 8200, and that works just fine.
> > (This on a 11/84 with a CMD controller)
>
> I managed to dig up a TZ30 and a couple TK50's last night, though I didn't
> get a chance to try it. If an Exabyte 8200 works just fine, I think I might
> try the Exabyte 8500, as I can hook it up to my PDP-11/23+ fairly easy
> (hooking an external drive up to my /73 as I mentioned would require
> rewiring the SCSI Bus). I just wish I'd thought to dig out a couple 8mm
> tapes while I was digging.
The 8500 should work fine as well, according to documentation I have.
> BTW, what do you mean by "didn't want to work". Do you mean that it wouldn't
> work at all with your PDP-11/84 and CMD controller? The TLZ06 works just
> fine on my PDP-11/73 with Viking controller. It's just with RSTS/E ANSI
> tapes that I seem to be having a problem.
I just tried with RSX, using BRU, DMP and INI. With DMP I tried a tape I
wrote on another machine with tar.
I got some funny error. I can send you the RSX error log of the occasion,
if that makes you happy. Both BRU and INI will create small blocks.
Btw, I also created small blocks on the NetBSD machine I have a DDS drive
on, and it went just fine there.
But I did notice that someone else said that the TLZ06 will not like DDS2
tapes, which is what I had. The NetBSD box appearantly have a DDS2
drive... (since it works fine)
Johnny
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt(a)update.uu.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Hi folks,
Just thought I'd report in after an excellent couple of days on the vintage
trail! Yesterday gave me a genuine MicroVAX I with a fully stuffed backplane
I haven't investigated yet, though there's definitely the 2-card CPU,
memory, RQDX disk controller (for the RD52) installed and a 4-line serial
option which will probably be a DHV11. I'll find out tomorrow. The system
came with a Tektronix 4019 colour display which is the biggest monitor
(physically) I've ever laid eyes on I think, complete with keyboard and
drawing tablet. Not sure what I'm going to do with it as yet - it's got to
be a 19" screen! Apparently the RD52 has some sort of CAD package installed
so I'll find out hopefully once the machine's stabilised itself to the house
temperature.
Also in the bundle was a boxful of Tangerine Microtan 65 bits including the
machine itself (with TANEX expansion) in a lovely home-made wooden box, what
looks suspiciously like an Apple ][ keyboard, full documentation and the
first 30 or so issues of the Tangerine User Group magazine. More on that
later. There's a handful of DEC cards too:
M7944 x2 - 4K RAM
M7680/M7681 - RK05 control cards
M7258 - LP11 driver
M7860 - DR11 driver
as well as a 4-slot self-contained backplane containing:
M7270 - KD11-HA LSI 11/2 CPU
M7944 x2 - 4K RAM
M8027 - LPV11 driver.
Also several copies of the MicroVAX II diagnostic kit on RX50 and RX33
floppies as well as (I think) most of VMS V5 on RX50. I don't think there's
enough disks for it to be a complete set :-/
Today brought a couple of visits, one to see Nick Toop who some of you may
know was involved with many early UK home computing projects including the
Science of Cambridge MK14 (supporting hardware), Acorn Atom (designer) and
the should-have-been-venerable Enterprise 64 (graphics chip and supporting
hardware). Lovely bloke - he sorted out my 'suspect' Atom and brought it
back to life! Excellent.
Second visit was to help Kevan Heydon of this 'ere list empty some of his
garage with Jules Richardson, so new museum additions are a cased Ohio
Superboard II (with docs), Memotech RS128 with FDX floppy subsystem (yay!),
boxed NeXT Station (double yay!), 2nd Microtan 65 with extended backplane
and more cards, and a CST Thor - Sinclair QL that's been massively expanded
and recased. Thanks Kevan :)
Faaaaaaantastic! Now where is it all going to go....
--
Adrian/Witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - possibly the UK's biggest online computer museum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - ex-monthly gothic shenanigans :o(
Anyone know if this story is true?
http://www.phonehelp.com/p-1-50.htm
(story about bell labs experiment where handset cords are made shorter
and shorter and help desk calls are monitored to find 'knee' in help
call curve to use as optimal length of handset cords)
certainly a little off topic - if there is a better place/list someone can
suggest I'm all ears. (alt.bell-labs.stories? :-)
I'm pretty gullible, so I believed it the first time I read it. I ran
into it again recently at this URL...
-brad
All this talk about emulators has got my juices flowing again.
I use emulators alot, and have always been fascinated with machine
emulation.
It's always been a desire of mine to code up an emulator of my own for some
box but I've never been confident enough in either my coding chops or
understanding of really low-level machine details to think I could pull it
off (I am an application programmer by day and have done little serious
system-level and below coding).
Recently I've been toying with maybe trying to do something, but where to
start? I picked a candidate like the Visual 1050 because my first thought
was "there's alot of free existing, debugged code that can be utilized" i.e.
no need to write a Z80 or 6502 core as there are quality ones available.
Being a cpm machine would appear to be another plus in this area. And, I
like this machine and I don't believe there is an existing emulator for it.
Now the part that I'm hoping someone who has written an emulator can shed
some light on: how much machine docs/specs does one need to hope to have a
fair shot at pulling this off successfully? For example, I'm pretty sure
that there must be some 6502 ROM code somewhere in that box that provide
graphic routines services. If you had a listing of this I'm sure that you'd
be that further ahead towards your goal. Or even if you knew where it was
mapping into memory you could at least dump it and disassemble it. Thing
is, all the docs I have are user guide/usage type things which obviously do
not go into these sort of technical details. I'm sure there are those that
could reverse engineer the entire machine soup-to-nuts but it certainly
seems like that is trying to find the needle in the haystack (which is maybe
some of the fun?).
Comments?
Hello all,
I have the following items available. If you want one, send me an email
OFF-LIST, and include your ZIP code (for shipping quotes). I'll take emails
until Wednesday morning to be fair to all. I will use my patented
name-in-a-hat method to resolve multiple people wanting the same items. I
will contact all winners on Wednesday afternoon. Thanks!
- (*FREE* + shipping) Wilson SX-503 Disk Exerciser. Good photo at
http://www.wilsonlabs.com/testers/sx530p.htm. According to the website this
item tests SMD Interface Disk Drives. It's about the width of an IBM PC
case, but a little shorter, and a little thicker. I guesstimate somewhere
around 25lbs or so in weight. Lights up when plugged in, but I have no
manual, so I cannot test. Comes with all cables seen in the photo. As a
bonus, it has a "Property of U.S Gov't DOT/FAA" sticker on it :-)
- (*FREE* + shipping) - Paper trays for an HP LaserJet III (no idea if
they'll fit other LaserJets)... 3 Letter, 1 Envelope, 1 Legal. All are
working, but very worn and used.
- (*FREE* + shipping) - Tecmar expansion chassis for IBM PC. Adds 7 8-bit
slots. Comes with card and cables that go in the PC. Case has some
scratches and light surface rust. About the size and shape of a PC case,
and weighs a ton!! Never powered it up, so it's untested and as-is. No
manuals...
- (*FREE* + shipping) - Two font cartridges for HP LaserJet III (no idea if
they'll work in other LaserJets) "Persuasive Presentations" and "Polished
Worksheets"
- ($5.00 + shipping) - Pacific Page PE Postscript Emulation Cartridge for HP
LaserJet. Working condition. Label on back says "010570 REV G. VERSION
4.1" and "IIP Single Slot; IID/III/IIID Left Slot"
- ($20.00 + shipping) - Intel series 310 Multibus I chassis. Picture at
http://www.northwesttechnical.com/multibus/chassis/syp310.jpg No drives, no
cards. Just chassis, power supply, backplane. Powered up at last use,
about a year ago. About the size of an IBM PC case, and quite heavy.
That's it for now ... If nobody wants them, they get trashed...
Rich B.
On Jan 18, 10:01, Richard A. Cini wrote:
> I pulled out my Model 100 the other day and discovered that the foam
in the
> hard case has begun to disintegrate. The hard case is the Radio Shack
> original-issue hard case, so the foam is a pretty big size.
>
> I'm sure that others have experienced this already and I was
searching for
> replacement options that didn't involve gluing together small pieces
of foam
> to fit the case.
Is this foam for dust filtering? Or thin foam for holding boards in
place? Or thick foam for cushioning against shock?
For the first, I use the filter material sold for cooker
hoods/extractors. It's cheap, available in many hardware stores and
kitchen suppliers, and doesn't impede the air flow too much. It can
also be pulled apart to get a half-thickness.
For the other two, I go to the nearest upholstery shop, or any place
that repairs furniture or car seats. They sell various densities and
thicknesses, often cut to size, or in standard small quantities (like
15" or 18" square).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi,
There's a PDP11/34, three RK07s and 20+ platters on uk ebay right now.
I don't have the space or any way of transporting it so I won't be
bidding, but hopefully there's someone who'll appreciate it.
Starting bid is 500 gbp. 14 hrs left...no bids so far.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3070793388&category=14…
--
Cheers,
Stan Barr stanb(a)dial.pipex.com
The future was never like this!
There is some hidden wisdom here! There are several plastics used for
making foam. One of these is polyurethane, others are polypropylene and
polyethylene. I have often thought that manufacturers who put high valued
goods in polyurethane should be responsible for the repairs even after 30
years; this stuff is often terrible, turning to either dust or paste,
neither of which is good for a camera or a computer. The paste variety is
very hard to completely remove.
Conversely, those camping mats can be made of PP or PE, which I have never
seen undergoing the transformation into a viscous liquid. You computer
should still be clean after you pass it on to the next generation.
Bob
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 17:49:35 +0000 (GMT)
From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
Subject: Re: Foam replacement options
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Message-ID: <m1AiH3K-000J2AC@p850ug1>
Content-Type: text/plain
>
> I pulled out my Model 100 the other day and discovered that the foam in the
> hard case has begun to disintegrate. The hard case is the Radio Shack
> original-issue hard case, so the foam is a pretty big size.
A tip I got from Amateur Photographer magazine, relating to foam for
camera cases, was to use a camper's sleeping mat. They're fairly hard
foam, about 1cm thick, and are larger than any carrying case I've ever
seen :-). And they're not too expensive.
Dunno if this would work for the M100 case, but it might be worth a try.
-tony
.
Was at the local thrift tonight and there are 4 apparently intact
Kaypro II units there. They want $20 each, and do not dicker.
I'd be willing to schlep them and ship them for a modest honorarium.
I don't know anything at all about Kaypros, and really don't care to
learn, so ALL I'll check for is huge dings in the box, obviously hosed
keyboards, and cracked screen. The thrift doesn't allow testing, either.
Reply off-list, please.
Doc