???
Ed Tillman
Store Automation Tech Support Specialist
Valero Energy Corporation
San Antonio, Texas, USA
Office: (210)592-3110, Fax (210)592-2048
Email: edward.tillman(a)valero.com <mailto:edward.tillman@valero.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: veeke200(a)tech.nhl.nl [mailto:veeke200@tech.nhl.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 3:09 AM
To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: read it immediately
here it is
Does anyone know exactly what a Smoke Signal Broadcasting DCB-4E cards are
for? It's and EXORbus card and has a MC6821P and a WD FD1791B-02 LSICs and
a lot so SS TTL ICs on it. Does anyone have data for the card?
Joe
I will try to find time on Wednesday (the next day I am at the site where
the floppies are) to zip them up and then I'll contact those interested
off the list.
joe heck
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Is there any interest is such beasts?
Mike
- --
Ottawa, Canada
Collector of vintage computers
http://www.ncf.ca/~ba600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAOrA2LPrIaE/xBZARAmm+AJ9BR2QFdQreualeuf/2KdR28bH1YgCdFQHS
nYdxg0UupzyqUyEdgvPVpHE=
=Si4n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Kevin Handy <kth(a)srv.net> wrote:
> So those thinks plugged into IBM mainframes that look a lot like
> keyboards, are not
> keyboards, because they transmit EBCDIC? And those things on those old
> teletypes
> aren't either because they use BAUDOUT?
I knew someone was going to ask about those! :-) Well, those are Classic and
therefore OK too. My fundamental points are:
1. Every person on Earth must be required to know the fundamental principles of
Computer Science, including the principles of character coding.
2. People must realise (just like ancient pagans did) that codes are more
primary and more fundamental than character shapes. To illustrate my point:
most people believe that letter 'A' is fundamentally a tent with a bar
between the slopes, and that 1000001 is one computer representation of it.
This is what I am challenging, I argue that letter 'A' is fundamentally
1000001 and that the shape with two slopes and a bar between them is merely
one possible representation of this fundamental 7-bit code, a representation
that is a passing fad of a society that uses handwriting, printing, paper,
and other barbaric antiques like this instead of directly transmitting binary
codes from one computer or brain to another.
3. Keyboards, just like all other tools, need to be viewed in this light: it is
not a device for entering a certain set of graphic characters, it is a device
for entering a certain set of codes in some charset. This is what the IFCTF
keyboard definition is all about.
MS
P.S. Oh, and the Latin alphabet needs to be renamed by law into ASCII
International Reference Variant (IRV) alphabet.
John Lawson <jpl15(a)panix.com> wrote:
> > 39th? Shouldn't it be older than that?
>
> No; they're very near Rochester.
But there already were IBM Hollerith machines in World War II, weren't there?
I even remember reading about Nazis using them for bean counting in their camps.
So how can it only be 39 years old? WW2 ended in 1945, so it must be at least
2004-1945=59 years old.
MS
Hi. i don't know if you have it already. I have one,. it is definetely 5V, however, I dont know if the (+) is inside or outside. If you know, please let me know since i need to plug it in too...
Jules Richardson (IIRC) was asking about this chip to repair a classic
computer peripheral (so it is on-topic)...
I can't find it in a databook, but I've found a circuit that uses it --
the 'Head Amplifier Playback' module (board P50) in a Philips VR2020 VCR
[1].It seems to contain 8 NPN transistors and nothing else (at least the
schematic of that board shows the internals of the IC as 8 transistors
only) and consists of 2 identical sections. Each is a long-tailed pair
with a couple more transistors acting as a current sink for the 'tail'.
Anyway, here's a pinout. There may be substrate connections, etc that I
don't know about, and which might matter if you want to design something
round the IC. But this should be enough to understand the circuit the
chip is used in. I assume the chip Jules is looking at is a 16 pin DIL
package.
I'll draw the schematic of half the chip, giving the pin numbers for one
section, with the corresponding pins for the other section in parentheses...
14 (11) 12 (13)
o o
| |
| |
/ \
|/ \|
3 (6) o-----| |-----o 4 (5)
|\> </|
\ /
| |
+-----+-----+
|
|
/
|/
2 (7) o-----|
|\>
\
|
+----------o 1 (8)
|
/
|/
15 (10) o-------|
|\>
\
|
|
o
16 (9)
-tony
Did you guys see this?
<http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2592518771&category=4504
5>. It's a thin manual for an EPROM programmer. This clown wants $9.80 for
shipping AND $2.80 for insurance (REQUIRED no less). Actual postage for
this via USPS bookrate is about 40 cents and insurance is 35 cents! How do
these clowns expect to stay in business!
Joe
Hi, Herb.
On Feb 14, 14:31, Herb Johnson wrote:
> Saw your msg below while searching the Web about Persci drives.
> I have a 277 manual, courtesty of Cromemco, in my inventory.
> I normally sell copies by the page but I would trade for copies
> of some of your manuals. Confirm you are still interested and
> we can work the details. I have the Persci 277, 299, (8-inch)
> manuals; what is the 207 and 272?
At the time, one of the places I looked was your site and I recall (I
think) seeing your manual. I've since been given a PDF copy, though,
so I don't need a "real" one.
As to the models, as you probably know, the 277 and 299 are twin drives
-- they take two disks -- the 277 being single-sided and the 299B being
double-sided. I only have the full spec for the 277/299, so I'm not
sure but I believe the 270/272 are single-mechanism versions (ie they
take one disk, not two).
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi
Actually it won't make a particularly good Jacobs
ladder. If it doesn't blow a breaker, the rods
will most likely melt off. It is not like a neon
sign transformer that is current limited, it is
a transformer that is current rated. Let me see,
60Kv at 30ma is 1800W. How long so you think the
rods will hold up to such power.
I recommend having a fire extinguisher handy.
>From: "ed sharpe" <esharpe(a)uswest.net>
>
>it should make a fine Jacobs ladder!
>ed!
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "ben franchuk" <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
>To: <General Discussion :>; "On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
><cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
>Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 9:37 PM
>Subject: Re: Aargh...It never ends..
>
>
>> Patrick Finnegan wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm. I've got the transformer off an X-Ray generator which puts out
>> > 60kV at probably at least 30mA sitting in my office where I've been
>> > playing with it a bit before bringing it home (and building a Bigger
>> > Better jacobs ladder). I think it'd probably sting a bit to get in the
>> > path of that...
>>
>> Build a demo fusor,that is lots of fun.
>> ( And $$$ and time and parts )
>> http://www.fusor.net/
>>
>> > It's quite funny, actually. When I tell people that I have it because
>> > "it makes sparks," no one seems to understand. But when I show them
>> > what it does, they're usually quite impressed and gain
>> > understanding. :)
>>
>> Wait till you roll out the dead body and show them how you can bring it
>> to life.:D
>>
>> > Pat
>> Ben.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
David V. Corbin <dvcorbin(a)optonline.net> wrote:
> Everybody, remember Hollerith's 39th Birthday is later this week!!!!!!!!
39th? Shouldn't it be older than that?
MS
...whose travels ever take them up near Boston?
Somebody down there has offered me a bunch of Visual 1050 items that I'm
interested in, but he is not willing to pack/ship the stuff and I can't get
down there anytime soon.
Alternatively, if someone is willing to try and handle the packing/shipping
for me let me know what terms you'd consider.
Thanks.
dc
_________________________________________________________________
Click, drag and drop. My MSN is the simple way to design your homepage.
http://click.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200364ave/direct/01/
Just caught Sellam on Media Television here in Toronto. The show is produced by our independent station, CITY - TV.
Is this old news?
Anyway, my 14 year old son called me into the room and we both watched the fairly long (for TV) interview/tour. Besides being very interesting to me, I feel it gave my son some new-found pride in what I do as a hobby. Kind of gave it some legitamacy. If anyone wants more details, let me know.
Brian M.
(seen Sunday Feb. 22/04 at 12:15)
Hi
I thought someone in this group might also be
interested in these books.
For those interested in Forth, the Forth Encyclopedia
( upper left ) is worth more than all the rest of the
items he has. Of course, the Forth Primer is a historic
item as well.
Dwight
>From: "Jimmy Pepp" <onanysunday(a)yahoo.com>
>
>Hi:
>
>My name is Charlie Krajewski. For several years I
>subscribed to and saved Forth literature. I am
>cleaning up and I'd like to find a good home for these
>journals, etc.
>
>Most of what I have can be seen in this pic:
>
>http://www.skcpumps.com/images/forth.jpg
>
>The FORML proceedings are 1983, 1984, 1985
>5 Issues of "The Journal of Forth R&D"
>1984 Forth Rochester Conference
>
>Everything is $5/Journal, Except for:
>"Using Forth" $20
>"Inside F83", $10
>
>All will be sold, first come, first serve.
>
>Make an offer. If I don't receive the asking price I
>will sell for the best offer.
>
>You will be billed for the exact postage. Items will
>be shipped Media Mail to minimize shipping charges.
>
>I may unearth more stuff later.
>
>Charlie Krajewski
>112 Golfview Drive
>McMurray, PA 15317
>724-941-5779
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
>http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
>
Hi
I wish they'd list what boards were in it. The
picture are just right at the edge of being able
to determine what boards it has.
Dwight
>From: "John Lawson" <jpl15(a)panix.com>
>
>
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2788264325&category=4193
>
>
>so far $150 - about a day to go.
>
> Cheers
>
>John
>
>
>
Hi John
You'll note that unlike most I've seen, this one has
the original component holders. Other than some dust
and rust, this looks like a good unit. The fact that
all of the regulators light up is a good indication.
Compared to other units, this one went for below its
expected value. If the seller had taken about 20 mins
to dust it off, he'd most likely got another $100 or
so for it.
Dwight
>From: "John Lawson" <jpl15(a)panix.com>
>
>
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2788209717&category=1247
>
>
>20 hours to go - $130.50 so far....
>
>Kinda funky looking and tried it out, says "it lights up"...
>
>
>Cheers
>
>John
>
>
>
>
der Mouse <mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca> wrote:
> Where did you find this definition?
It will be the IFCTF definition when I get around to posting it. Though it will
say "ASCII or ASCII extension", and I'm sorry that I didn't make the last bit
clear in my message you are replying to.
> (I suppose typewriters old enough
> to not contain computers don't have keyboards?)
Typewriters were a passing fad of the 19th century. Computers have been around
for billions of years and will be around for billions of years to come. Every
living cell has a microprocessor in its nucleus (too bad biologists are still
refusing to use standard computer science terminology and therefore keep
reinventing the wheels of computer science), and the pagan gods and goddesses
who created us (wrote and compiled our DNA program) surely used computers. The
spacecraft they used to get to this planet from theirs were also computer-
controlled. Oh, and ASCII terminals are also as old as humanity: every ancient
pagan temple had a terminal for the priests to communicate with the gods. And
yes, they used a 7-bit code, 7 being the favourite number of Enki, the god who
played the greatest role in the creation of human civilisation. The 7-bit codes
didn't have the graphic renditions we use today, but then the code is primary,
graphic rendition (if you use one at all) is secondary.
Oh, and I often tend to decode ASCII as Anunnaki Standard Code for Information
Interchange, Anunnaki being the ancient Shumerian term for "Those Who from
Heaven to Earth Came" (i.e., ET visitors translated into modern English), which
was also the proper name by which the pagan gods and goddesses called
themselves. (Different human worshippers knew them by different names, but the
only true name is the one by which the gods called *themselves*.)
> For that matter, based on your comment header, your Compose key is as
> evil as the alt keys you're railing against, since the "what ASCII code
> is it supposed to generate?" question is just as forceful - and indeed,
> since you're producing non-ASCII codes, I guess your LK201 will no
> longer be a keyboard when you're done.
See above, I should have said "ASCII or ASCII extension", the latter being
things like Soviet KOI-8 and ISO 8859 series. But when it comes to Alt, you
gotta admit that it originates in the PC (PeeCee, pee sea, etc) world. DEC's
adding of it to LK401 was a consession to the PeeCee world. And I won't make
any concessions to the enemy.
> (I was afraid a bunch of other keycodes would change or
> some such).
That's unlikely because keeping everything else the same simplifies the firmware
both in the LK401 and in the products designed to use it. (The former needs to
work in LK201 compatibility mode, and most of the latter probably accept an
LK201 unofficially.)
> The keypad . key seems to be dead, though I suspect that may be broken
> keyboard hardware rather than anything LK401-specific.
It's dead in both LK201 and LK401 modes, right?
MS
John,
I've been trying to get a hold of you and you aren't responding to my
messages. Before I give up on you altogether I want to make sure it isn't
because you are ignoring me but rather because perhaps you aren't
receiving my messages.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
I've got a PC ISA board here that is interesting and I'm trying to
identify it. The only markings of note on the board are Okidata 21025.
There is a daughterboard fitted to some sockets on the main board and it
has markings of "OKI KV96-X8D" and "PU1036-4924". The main board has an
Intel i960, and two SIMM slots (populated). It's also got two OKI chips
with the following markings:
OKI ATC
IPC Rev.2.0
MSMI0S0980-014
OKI ATC
HCC Rev.2.0
MSMI0S0300-018
The backplate has 2 RJ14
jacks and a DA-15 (er, the connector is actually bigger than an A shell,
like a Mac video connector). It also has an audio jack.
It could be a modem. It could be a voice board. It might be both. What
is it? Anyone? Anyone?
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Ethan Dicks <dickset(a)amanda.spole.gov> wrote:
> Why? We always "mutiliated" ours. The 8080 (8085?) on the 11/730 console
> board caches the tape directory, so if you put the files on the tape in
> the order they are expected, it loads *lots* faster (like 2 min vs 15 min).
>
> I had a script to build consoles from the VMS side using Exchange. We never
> used virgin DEC-written TU58s.
What you did is perfectly reasonable for *use*. It is not appropriate for
history preservation. For the latter purpose one needs a sector image of a
virgin DEC original TU58, and anything else can be described as mutilated for
this purpose.
MS
der Mouse <mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca> wrote:
> As may be. Do they not have keyboards?
Well, OK, I would argue that the keyboard of a 19th century typewriter is still
an ASCII entry device. Any time you produce letter 'A', even if you handwrite
it or type it on a 19th century typewriter, you are actually producing the
fundamental symbol ("symbol" defined as "signal element" in communication
theory) 1000001 in a roundabout way, whether you realise this or not. Kids who
handwrite letters and 19th century people who typed on typewriters certainly
don't/didn't realise that they are actually generating ASCII letters, but
that's what they are fundamentally (see my previous message in response to
Kevin).
> I do? I don't know where it originated.
Well, it's certainly more than 10 years old and on-topic for this list, so if
I'm wrong on this, ClassicCmpers please correct me, but I think the Alt key
originates at the time when people began to stray from the sanctity of the
Terminal and started entertaining the fad of "personal computer" /
"workstation". That's when they moved Esc and Ctrl from where the Gods and
Goddesses of ASCII placed them (immediately to the left of 1 and A,
respectively), thinking that people don't need them anymore. This is the shift
in mentality that I am revolting against: previously everyone was required to
know the ASCII chart by heart and everybody used Ctrl and Esc to enter special
codes. Anyone who typed on a keyboard knew that he (yes, HE!) was sending
CODES to the computer. Then the mentality changed to the current fucking M$
Word mentality, where the luser (a chick) knows nothing about Computer Science
and only know "to invoke this function in Word, I press Alt-this..."
> What _I_ dislike about the LK401 (and LK201, for that matter) is that
> the <X] key and the right Shift key are single keys; I want each of
> those to be split into two keys.
Let me guess... You want it like the VT100 keyboard (and all truly Classic
ASCII keyboards of the Golden Age) where in that area you had 4 separate keys
generating ASCII BS, Delete, CR, and LF, right? If so, I'm in perfect
agreement!
MS
(This one appears to have fallen through the cracks.)
Patrick Finnegan <pat(a)computer-refuge.org> wrote:
> I don't have any images for the 11/730... but I too am searching for
> images - but for my 11/750. If anyone has images of tapes used on the
> 11/750, please let me know.
Original DEC:
ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG:/pub/UNIX/support/mdec/750console
For UNIX:
ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG:/pub/UNIX/4.3BSD-Quasijarus0c/cassette.Z
MS
Brad Parker <brad(a)heeltoe.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have a file image of any sort of 730 console boot? I don't
> care if it's current, I just need something to test.
As I wrote before, I have a mutilated (by VMS) 730 console tape image. Since
it's mutilated, it's not on my FTP site right now. But it's still better than
nothing, so I'll dig it up.
> I have a tape which claims to be current but I can't read it (yet).
> I'll debug the tu58 shortly [...]
When you do, please read a block image of your tape, as I really need a virgin
block-for-block image of an original 730 console tape that is not mutilated by
VMS EXCHANGE.
MS
I wrote:
: As I wrote before, I have a mutilated (by VMS) 730 console tape image. Since
: it's mutilated, it's not on my FTP site right now. But it's still better than
: nothing, so I'll dig it up.
It is now on my FTP site in:
ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG:/pub/UNIX/support/mdec/730console.v58
MS
Patrick Finnegan <pat(a)computer-refuge.org> wrote:
> I don't have any images for the 11/730... but I too am searching for
> images - but for my 11/750. If anyone has images of tapes used on the
> 11/750, please let me know.
Original DEC:
ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG:/pub/UNIX/support/mdec/750console
For UNIX:
ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG:/pub/UNIX/4.3BSD-Quasijarus0c/cassette.Z
MS
Witchy <witchy(a)binarydinosaurs.co.uk> wrote:
> This is why I stopped helping him with the VT420 stuff. It might just be me,
> but I like being thanked for the help every now and then. That didn't happen
> in this case.
Witchy, I'm sorry that I didn't thank you enough. I just happened to hook up my
VT340 (for a different unrelated experiment) and accidentally realised that it
also supports hex compose, which I then used to figure out the answers to all my
questions. But thanks for your earlier help!
MS
My son, who isn't even old enough to play video games, loves our Neo
Geo cabinet. He loves to stand on a stool and play with the buttons,
sticks, and to watch the games. Unfortunately he also loves to put
handprints on the plexiglass in front of the screen.
What is a good way to clean the handprints off without damaging the
plexiglass (I have no idea how sensitive it is to cleaning fluids).
Zane
--
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
Out of curiosity, what were they complaining about? If it's just the use
of the SGI logo, that's easily remedied (I'll replace it with something
non-copyrighted... wasn't there a picture somewhere on the web of a
Rack Onyx sitting next to a dumpster?).
If, however, it concerns contents, (i.e. hardware hacks to the machine)
that may be another matter... however, I don't see how they could
pursue this, as long as you're not reverse-engineering a PROM. I still
believe you're allowed to take things apart, fix 'em and put 'em back
together again.
I will however, state that I don't have the financial means (or inclination)
to get into a legal fight with SGI over this...
-al-
-acorda(a)1bigred.com
-----Original Message-----
From: James Rice [mailto:jrice54@charter.net]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 6:35 PM
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: "This old SGI" page - anyone have a copy?
I'm glad to know the "paralegal from hell" hasn't contacted you yet.
"Never Beige" and "The Sgi Addict" bit the dust due to legal threats
>from SGI. I have enjoyed your site and hope to see it online once again.
James
Corda Albert J DLVA wrote:
>Since this is actually my page, I should probably see what's going on...
>admittedly, I've kind of let it lapse for the past couple of years,
>(things got really busy for a while...). When I first put this together,
>it was the only reference out there of this type for SGI stuff (which is
why
>I did it.) Now, there seem to be a whole host of SGI specific sites, so
>I never really saw the need to update it... the new sites seemed to be
>handling the newer systems quite adequately.
>
...
<Deleted for brevity...>
In my quest to boot my vax 730 I ran into the gummer roller problem. I
fixed that but my tu58 seems to be unhappy. As part of debugging it I
made a little DB-9 adapter for the 10 pin header so I can run tu58sim
and the tu58 emulator.
The 730 appears to run the tu58 at 38400 baud and will talk to the tu58
simulator just fine. So now, naturally I'd like to try and give it some
valid micro code :-)
Does anyone have a file image of any sort of 730 console boot? I don't
care if it's current, I just need something to test.
I have a tape which claims to be current but I can't read it (yet).
I'll debug the tu58 shortly but in the mean time I'd like to see if my
R80 works :-)
-brad
Folks, I realise that I have lost my argument and I'm sorry for starting this
thread in the first place.
I will not post another message in this thread. (Though I'm enjoying some of
the really creative responses a few people have posted.)
MS
Thanks to all...this equipment is spoken for.
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
Hello, all:
I'm considering upgrading the server equipment in my house and before I
shift things around or consider selling stuff on eBay I wanted to see if
anyone may be interested in the system I have. I keep this equipment in the
shop, which in a ranch-style house, is below the bedrooms. The half-dozen
fans are pretty noisy and my kids complain about the drone. So, I'm want to
put together something a bit quiter :-)
The server is a Compaq ProLiant 800R rack-mounted dual Pentium Pro server
with 384mb of RAM, a 9gb boot drive and a Smart 2DH RAID controller. The
RAID array is in a Compaq ProLiant U1 rack-mounted array which contains 5
9.1gb hot-swap ultra-wide 7200RPM SCSI drives. I also have some spare system
components to go along with it.
The stuff is heavy but shippable by UPS in two boxes (I have the original
crate for the U1 enclosure). It's been in continuous service for two years
now. The server came off-lease from Ernst & Young. The U1 crate was new as
were the drives. It presently runs Windows NT4 Server.
If anyone might be interested, please contact me off-list. Shipping would
be from 11791 and figure that one box weighs 50 pounds and the other about
35. I'd be interested in swapping it for an IMSAI 8080...ha ha...just
kidding. About $300 plus shipping would do it.
Thanks.
Rich
Rich Cini
Collector of classic computers
Build Master for the Altair32 Emulation Project
Web site: http://highgate.comm.sfu.ca/~rcini/classiccmp/
/************************************************************/
der Mouse <mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca> wrote:
> Does anyone know of any doc on the protocol spoken by the LK401?
I have the LK201 spec, which appears in Appendix B of VCB02 Video Subsystem
Technical Manual (EK-104AA-TM, a scan is online and listed in
http://vt100.net/manx/), but nothing for LK401. But I like the LK201 better,
though. LK201 is more classic, more real. LK401 is a more flimsy plastic
thingy. I'm also quite pissed off by and won't tolerate the removal of the
Compose and Wait LEDs, and the PeeCee-smelling Alt keys are disgusting.
(What ASCII codes are they supposed to generate? A keyboard is by definition a
device for transferring ASCII codes from a human to a computer.)
> Specifically, both shift keys give me
> the same code, and both "Alt Function" keys and the right-hand "Compose
> Character" key are completely dead.
Yup, the LK401 is in LK201 compatibility mode. It's there so that those who
love LK201 but don't have one can use LK401 as a stopgap substitute until we
can seize state power in a Revolution and order resumed production of LK201s.
> While the shift keys could be
> wired together, the presence of an LK_KEY_R_SHIFT define argues against
> that,
They are wired together on LK201. Separate codes for left and right Shift keys
are an LK401 extension.
> I conjecture that at least some of this is because it's running in
> LK201 mode; on comparing it to an LK201 I note that the three dead keys
> have no obvious analogues on the LK201.
Exactly.
> There are defines which appear to imply that sending 0xe9
> and expecting 0xba in return might put it in LK401 mode,
That's what you need to do.
> but there's no
> indication of what changes (for example, how LK201-compatible it is).
> I can of course just try it and see, but I'd much rather have real doc
> if it's available.
Well, sorry, I don't have any LK401 docs, just LK201, so you'll have to just
experiment.
> I'm not sure whether this is
> strictly on-topic or not,
It definitely is!
Paul Koning <pkoning(a)equallogic.com> wrote:
> I can't offer LK401 specifics, but just in case it helps, you can find
> the complete LK201 description in the PRO 300 series technical
> manual. An online copy lives in
> http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/dec/pdp11/EK-PC300-V1-001_pro300tecV1.pdf
> or ...V2.pdf. I don't remember which of the two volumes has this.
It's probably the same LK201 spec that I have from Appendix B of VCB02 TM. (I
can't look at it, though, as it's a PDF, and I don't look at PDFs. If you want
me to look at something, make it ASCII.)
MS
P.S. I'm right in the process of writing some code for LK201. Here is the
header comment describing what I'm doing:
/*
* This module turns the DEC LK201 keyboard into an IFCTF keyboard. All LK201
* keys are given their standard ASCII meaning, and Compose feature is supported
* for entry of 8-bit characters (see below). Arrow keys generate ISO standard
* control sequences. The keypad can operate in numeric or application mode
* like on VT100, generating the same codes/sequences as on VT100. All function
* keys generate control sequences like on VT220 with some extensions. In
* general, the LK201 operates like the input half of VT220.
*
* ASCII input from the keyboard goes into a UNIX tty. This module can be
* activated by any user on any given tty, in which case the tty line is to be
* connected to the LK201, and input goes into the input queue of the same tty
* via ttyinput. Workstation drivers in the kernel can also attach this module
* in different ways so that the hardware which talks to the LK201 doesn't have
* to presented as a tty, and the input can be routed to another tty that may
* also handle workstation display output.
*
* Input in three charsets is supported: ASCII, ISO Latin-1 and KOI-8. The base
* keyboard always inputs ASCII and supports all 128 possible 7-bit characters.
* If the tty receiving the input allows 8-bit input, Compose key is enabled and
* 8-bit ISO Latin-1 characters can be entered. Hex compose using the numeric
* keypad is supported like on VT340 and VT420, which allows all 8-bit codes to
* be entered, including C1. (While 7-bit characters can also be entered via
* Compose, it is intended for entering 8-bit ISO Latin-1 characters, and is
* enabled only when the receiving tty allows 8-bit input.)
*
* An additional feature not offered by DEC is provided to enter 8-bit input in
* Russian KOI-8 instead of Latin-1. If the tty receiving the input is
* configured for KOI-8, the Latin-1 Compose feature is not available (Latin-1
* characters are garbage in KOI-8 environment) and the Compose key is redefined
* as the KOI-8 RUS/LAT switch. LAT mode is ASCII and in RUS mode Russian KOI-8
* characters are entered per yawerty map. Also in KOI-8 mode a Meta mode is
* provided which temporarily supercedes the RUS/LAT mode, entered via
* Shift-Compose. In this mode the keyboard uses the standard 7-bit ASCII map
* (with Shift, Caps Lock, and Ctrl working normally), but bit 7 is set. Like
* hexadecimal compose in Latin-1 mode, this feature allows all 8-bit codes to
* be entered.
*
* The VT220-like operation of LK201 can be altered in two ways to make it more
* UNIX-friendly. One modification, originating in VT320, puts ESC at E00
* (upper left corner of main keypad), moves the `~ key to B00 where DEC has put
* <>, and puts '<>' over ',.'. This modification makes the keyboard more like
* traditional ASCII keyboards UNIX was designed for. The other modification
* makes the F11/12/13 keys generate ESC/BS/LF like in VT100 mode on VT2xx/3xx
* terminals, while all other function keys generate their "canonical" VT2xx-
* style control sequences. This modification allows people to start taking
* advantage of new VT2xx generation features while keeping the ESC/BS/LF
* function of F11/12/13 keys from VT100 mode. Finally, the character rubout
* key generates the erase character set on the receiving tty.
*
* Autorepeat, bell and keyclick can be customised like on DEC products. A note
* about keyclicks though. The LK201 is misdesigned in a way that makes very
* clear why keyboards should be designed and built as IFCTF keyboards in
* hardware. LK201 was designed so that the host needs to configure it and then
* for the most part let it take care of itself. It implements both autorepeat
* and keyclick internally so that in theory the host only needs to receive and
* accept its transmissions without sending anything back on every key.
*
* The problem is that the keyboard doesn't know whether any given key has any
* function or not in the application in use (in each combination of Ctrl and
* Shift modifiers), and with the VT2xx/3xx terminals we've grown used to the
* keyclick being generated only if the key is defined. The keyboard isn't
* really designed for host control of the keyclick either: while there is a
* command to generate a keyclick, the keyboard is clearly designed for
* automatic keyclick generation. So how do the terminals do it? Magic?
* Well, they do a real kludge. When the keyclicks are enabled in setup, the
* LK201 is configured with keyclicks disabled. When the terminal receives a
* code for a pressed key, it checks whether that key is defined and thus
* should sound a keyclick. If a keyclick is needed, it sends a sequence to
* the LK201 that enables the keyclicks (with the desired volume), sounds the
* keyclick, and disables the keyclicks right away. Of course this is ugly and
* basically defeats the LK201 design. (Actually this is so ugly that I just
* couldn't believe that DEC terminals do it. I had to sniff the traffic
* between VT340 and LK201 to convince myself that it really does this. It
* really does unfortunately.)
*
* In this implementation I've decided not to bother with this and to let LK201
* click on every key. In this implementation almost all keys are always
* defined and generate some code or sequence. The only exceptions are Compose
* in 7-bit only mode and some main keypad keys that are not defined with Ctrl.
* Since these are rare exceptions and they are the only ones, I have decided
* not to bother.
*/
Since this is actually my page, I should probably see what's going on...
admittedly, I've kind of let it lapse for the past couple of years,
(things got really busy for a while...). When I first put this together,
it was the only reference out there of this type for SGI stuff (which is why
I did it.) Now, there seem to be a whole host of SGI specific sites, so
I never really saw the need to update it... the new sites seemed to be
handling the newer systems quite adequately.
The last time I logged into Geocities, it was an independent company...
I just tried it a few minutes ago and I don't seem to have an
account anymore... Also, it seems that Geocities is now owned by
by Yahoo...
Also, I haven't had anyone contact me about a problem with the hacked-up
SGI logo I used, but it could be because the email link on that page seems
to have gone the way of my geocities acount... vanished.
In the past, I have received requests (freely granted) requests by people
to mirror the site, so there should be some copies available... I need to
see if I can dig up my original, or download one of the mirrors so that I
can see about restoring and/or rehosting it somewhere.
I'll see if I can figure out what is going on, and let everyone know...
-al-
-cordaaj(a)nswc.navy.mil
-----Original Message-----
From: ben franchuk [mailto:bfranchuk@jetnet.ab.ca]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 10:48 AM
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: "This old SGI" page - anyone have a copy?
James Rice wrote:
> Sgi has been methodically shutting down all of the hobbyist websites
> that make any reference to Sgi or use any form of any Sgi logos. You
> would think that a corporation that has as many problems as Sgi would
> have better things to do.
Well can we get people to burn CD-roms of web sites with old
computer information least it be forgottion or distroyed as
web sites change and Server's crash?
Does anyone know of any doc on the protocol spoken by the LK401? I've
got one, and while I can deduce some of the protocol from the NetBSD
driver, there are some problems. Specifically, both shift keys give me
the same code, and both "Alt Function" keys and the right-hand "Compose
Character" key are completely dead. While the shift keys could be
wired together, the presence of an LK_KEY_R_SHIFT define argues against
that, and surely the other three keys are not supposed to be dead.
I conjecture that at least some of this is because it's running in
LK201 mode; on comparing it to an LK201 I note that the three dead keys
have no obvious analogues on the LK201.
Looking at the driver I'm using, this appears to be the keyboard's
fault; I see very little translation going on between the keyboard and
the events reaching userland.
This leaves me looking for enough protocol docs to tell the keyboard to
do these. There are defines which appear to imply that sending 0xe9
and expecting 0xba in return might put it in LK401 mode, but there's no
indication of what changes (for example, how LK201-compatible it is).
I can of course just try it and see, but I'd much rather have real doc
if it's available.
I did some looking around and found a number of archived messages
talking about LK401s, but none that said anything about the protocol at
this level.
In case it matters, the keyboard I have is
MODEL NO. LK401-AA
REV. NO. A03
SERIAL NO. HJ203R6565
CAT. LIST. 108RX33S-1E
FCC I.D. A09-LK401
and I'm using it with a DEC 3000/300X. I'm not sure whether this is
strictly on-topic or not, but if not I think it's probably close. :)
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse(a)rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 23:35, Jules Richardson wrote:
> Oh, and if anyone's dishing out Perq wisdom there's also a Perq 1 with
> a
> display fault too - on that one the image is centered on the screen,
> but
> squashed into about 80% of the normal width, and maybe 10% of normal
> height. It's also very non-rectangular in nature.
Chatted with my good buddy who still makes a living repairing
terminals. His guess is that the horizontal yoke isolation cap is
leaking/bad. This will definitely make the horizontal squoosh. Many
terminals derive the drive voltage for the vertical from the horizontal
flyback - thereby causing the problem you are seeing.
His recommendations:
1. look for an oversized cap (electrolytic - yup one of those
beasties...) near the horizontal drive transistor (generally
heatsinked) that has a rating between 35 and 60 volts and a value
between 2.2 and 20 microfarads. This is the isolation cap. If it is in
the 2.2 to 4.7 volt range replace it with a film cap - you will never
have a problem again. You can't reform this one since they put AC
(albeit mostly DC) through the cap and once it goes it's gone.
2. Replace any electrolytic near anything that looks hot.
3. Inspect, clean, lubricate, and replace, if necessary, the yoke
connector socket. His experience is that when the cap goes, the current
through the yoke goes up and fries the connector. The bad connection
will cause early failures.
If the vertical problem persists, you probably have a similar problem
with a cap in the vertical drive or a power supply problem.
Good luck
Claude Ceccon
I have a Sigma floppy disk controller which I believe to be for Qbus.
The assembly number is 400255 rev B and S/N is 4331. It is a dual board
and has a pair of 2901 bit slices and an assortment of bipolar PROMs.
From the field guide, I found this entry:
SDC-RXV31 Q Sigma floppy disk controller. Emulates RXV21/RX02.
(Supports Mitsubishi M2696-63)
I assume this is the one.
Does anyone have a manual for this controller (copy or scan)?
--tnx
--tom
Hi!
A few month ago I acquired a VAXstation 3200. It runs runs very nicely
with a Emulex UC08 SCSI-Controller off a 1GB full-height SCSI-Disk.
There is one QBUS card in the system that I can't identify.
As far as I know the VAX has been used for measurement data aquisition
in a physics laboratory.
The only connector to the outside is for a 40-pin ribbon cable. I got a
very long (10m I guess) cable with the box so I suppose it is using some
kind of differential data transmission.
Unfortunately I don't know what was connected to the other end of the
cable. Probably the card is useless without that second part (maybe a
A/D-Converter?).
The board occupies all 4 slots and is populated mostly with small ICs of
the 74xxx series and some PALs.
The Label says:
KINETICSYSTEMS
MODEL D1571
MODEL 2922-Z1B
I did not find any usable information on he net. Does anyone of you know
what this board does?
Thanks in advance,
Sebastian
> > Rumor has it the Foothill flea market is gone (moving to Lockheed?)
>
> Somewhere near there, details at <http://www.asvaro.org/fleamarket.shtml>.
>
> -Frank McConnell
This isn't too bad, probably easier to get to (better freeway and
even Light Rail Access)....
Trying to save space and not use a real terminal at this time, I
decided to wire my VAX 4000-200's console to a serial port on my Sun
Ultra-1... however, nothing seems to be working when I try connecting
to it with tip (the port, set for 9600 BPS, appears to be ok, since I
can get an OK response from a modem). However, there's no response at
all on the Sun when I attempt connecting to the VAX using tip or cu.
Kermit, even if run as root, is giving me a "Sorry, write access to
UUCP lockfile directory denied." message; need to sort that out, but
I think that's a separate issue.
The LED indicator on the VAX counted dow to three, waiting to boot, so
that seems to be ok.
Here's how I wired the crossover cable (typical crossover cable wiring,
should work, right?):
MMJ DB25
DTR 1 ---- 6, 8 DSR, DCD
TX+ 2 ---- 3 RD
TX- 3 ---- 7 Sig Gnd
RX- 4 ---- 7
RX+ 5 ---- 2 TD
DSR 6 ---- 20 DTR
----------- MMJ pinout I'm using,
1 2 3 4 5 6 - viewed from
-------+ + console
+--+
Any ideas as to what I'm doing wrong? Didn't use my breakout box yet,
since I need to get new batteries for it.
--
Copyright (C) 2003 R. D. Davis The difference between humans & other animals:
All Rights Reserved an unnatural belief that we're above Nature &
rdd(a)rddavis.org 410-744-4900 her other creatures, using dogma to justify such
http://www.rddavis.org beliefs and to justify much human cruelty.
> {SValley} We've only got about half the shops we used to (3 or 4).
> Even in the last couple years a couple more closed down.
What about these:
WierdStuff, Halted, Alltronics, Haltek. All OK?
--
Haltek closed several years ago.
Alltronics moved to South San Jose, haven't been there but it is supposed to
be MUCH smaller.
Rumor has it the Foothill flea market is gone (moving to Lockheed?)