Does anyone know of any list, group or museum for vintage (1970s) professional Audio/Video equipment enthusiasts? Of course vintage computers were a part of some of this A/V equipment, especially for control systems.
If this is off topic, any replies can be sent to my email directly ics65 at sbcglobal.net
,George
*There's several old computer items I'm in the market for. Is this an
appropriate venue to post? Any recommendations (besides here) for
posting vintage "want ads"?
Is it more effective to post an entire list within one post, or to have
one post per item wanted?
Thanks very much for any comments.
jS
*
Hello Roger,
Do you only need to convert the frequency for the motor or for
the whole unit?
If it is only the motor, you might look for a converter which is
used for jukeboxes. Some people here in the Netherlands use a
frequency converter for the motor which drives the turntable,
the rest of the electronics does work without problems on 50Hz.
Regards,
Ed
> Thanks for whoever it was who posted the info on the IBM 029 keypunch
> on eBay. I have won it, nobody else bid. After it has been shipped
> across the Atlantic I will have to think about converting it from 60Hz
> to 50Hz. I have the remains of a 50Hz verifier which has a 240v / 50Hz
> motor I should be able to use. Hopefully the rest runs on DC, so a
> step down transformer before the transformers and bridge rectifiers
> might be enough. Shipping costs more than the item of course.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts if it is worth trying the whole thing with
> just a 240 - 110 transformer? If the motor burns out, not the end of
> the world.
>
>
>
--
Certified : VCP 3.x, SCSI 3.x SCSA S10, SCNA S10
Richard <legalize at xmission.com> wrote:
> In article <f4eb766f0904031640g7c90507eo92411f16365021e1 at mail.gmail.com>,
> Ethan Dicks <ethan.dicks at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> > Back in the day, we used to move copies around on magtape, bypassing
>> > all sorts of stream-of-bytes issues. Today, of course, most things
>> > expect streams of bytes, so that's how most things are presented.
>
> How does magtape avoid the stream-of-bytes issue?
By the simple fact that a tape is *never* a stream of bytes?
Unix tries to mimic a stream of bytes on a tape, but as far as I know,
noone wants that, and never uses it, instead going to the raw device,
and doing all the operations a tape requires anyway.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Hi there.
I'm currently using "nose pickers" (a friend at work related that
pleasant name) aka XKM grabbers
(http://us.st12.yimg.com/us.st.yimg.com/I/webtronics_2042_10920298) to
attach my low-cost pc-based logic analyzer to some old DIP chips.
They are pretty nice but when you start using a bunch in a row, they can
get pretty cumbersome.
I'm looking for DIP IC test clips for both 40-pin and 48-pin chips.
40-pin doesn't seem too hard to come by, 48-pin seems harder.
Here's a picture of what I'm basically looking for:
http://www.ap-products.com/images/tc02.gif
They clip on the already socketed IC and provide square male header pins
on the top of the clip to attach.
These are for personal use, and I don't want to spend $100 on clips.
Anyone have a line on cheap clips or happen to have any around you want
to get rid of?
Thanks
Keith
P.S. I can find plenty of online datasheets from various manufacturers
but trying to find a stocking reseller that will sell them onesy twosy
to hobbyists is harder.
There are no operational differences that you'll notice between
a DEQNA and a DELQA cabinet kit if you're using a PDP-11.
There are two extra signal lines on the DELQA vs DEQNA cables,
which correspond to "Control in, circuit "A", and "B".
The purpose of these, I'm not sure; maybe some sort
of throttling or flow control. I doubt the PDP-11 driver
uses it. Not so sure about the MicroVax.
For basic operations, with a DEQNA-compatible driver,
the cables should perform identically, as they are
pin-compatible.
T
> I
> have been told that the DEQNAs had problems and would lock up or
> experience
> other reliability issues. DEQNAs are not supported after about VMS
> 5.4/5.5,
> which is why I need a DELQA. I am not sure what the minimum VMS
version
> is
> for DELQA though.
DEQNAs never worked right, even after 12 revisions. That's why they
were dumped and the LQA was created. For moderate loads a QNA should be
ok, though. The big problem was that they weren't good enough for Local
Area VAXcluster use, which was a big thing in those days. I don't think
DECnet was thrilled with them either but DECnet was more tolerant of
misbehavior.
I don't remember DEQNAs being dumped by the PDP11 operating systems.
paul
"Paul Koning" <Paul_Koning at Dell.com> wrote:
>> > I
>> > have been told that the DEQNAs had problems and would lock up or
>> > experience
>> > other reliability issues. DEQNAs are not supported after about VMS
>> > 5.4/5.5,
>> > which is why I need a DELQA. I am not sure what the minimum VMS
> version
>> > is
>> > for DELQA though.
>
> DEQNAs never worked right, even after 12 revisions. That's why they
> were dumped and the LQA was created. For moderate loads a QNA should be
> ok, though. The big problem was that they weren't good enough for Local
> Area VAXcluster use, which was a big thing in those days. I don't think
> DECnet was thrilled with them either but DECnet was more tolerant of
> misbehavior.
>
> I don't remember DEQNAs being dumped by the PDP11 operating systems.
That's because they haven't been. :-)
I actually have an interesting reverse behaviour, where I can get a
DELQA to freeze on my 11/93 running RSX, while a DEQNA will continue
working fine.
(I do suspect it is because the extra care DECnet takes to keep a QNA
ticking which saves me, but anyway... Interesting...)
And to answer the OP: the cab kits are the same, modulo the letters
under the connector.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
There's a fellow in town selling a used Xerox 2825 laser printer with
duplexer for $100. I'm interested because it will do 11x17.
Does anyone have any experience with one of these? Worth looking at
or run away?
Thanks,
Chuck
I purchased the Godbout 85/88 card, seems to be working fine so far,
although
not at 5Mhz. I must have a memory card that can't handle the blazing 5 Mhz
access.
I am looking for a PLM86 compiler. I have the PLM80 compiler and
linker/locator
(if anyone needs this, please let me know) but am struggling finding the
PLM86
compiler and associated linker/locator. I am currently loading code into my
system via a HEX loader I wrote and sending the hex file in via the serial
port
>from my Mac Pro (yes, a $5000 quad-processor computer serving as a dumb
terminal
to my 2Mhx 8080).
I want to be able to write PLM86 code and do the same for the 8088 on the
GodBout card.
Anyone know where I can find PLM86?
Jeff Erwin
Hi gang,
I ask every now and then here if anybody has run across one of these machines or might know sombody willing to part with one.
I had one once, new, and want to go back to those days.
If you help me find one, I will cross your palm with cash to feed YOUR vintage computer habit.
Thanks,
Randy
_________________________________________________________________
Quick access to your favorite MSN content and Windows Live with Internet Explorer 8.
http://ie8.msn.com/microsoft/internet-explorer-8/en-us/ie8.aspx?ocid=B037MS…
Anyone have any info on rebuilding the head for a regular 9-pin dot
matrix printer? I have an open pin-5 coil on mine, and I would like to
take it apart to see if I can repair/replace the coil, BUT I am a bit
concerned about taking these things apart. Springs flying off, etc.
Looking on-line does not turn up anything (so far) on dismantling these
suckers. If necessary I will document it myself, but was hoping the info
was already out there!
The head I have is an Anadex DPH-100, and the only place on-line that
shows them no longer repairs 'em! Nor did the tech I spoke to recall any
details...
John :-#)#
--
John's Jukes Ltd. 2343 Main St., Vancouver, BC, Canada V5T 3C9
Call (604)872-5757 or Fax 872-2010 (Pinballs, Jukes, VideoGames)
www.flippers.com
"Old pinballers never die, they just flip out"
This is quite off-topic, but we have such a knowledgeable group here I
thought I'd ask:
I just bought a pair of MyVu Shades 301, a head mounted display
system. However, I don't see the RCA connectors I was expecting, but
there *is* a cable that says it goes to "standard DVD players". It has
a green stereo 1/8" plug, which I assume is audio, and then a yellow
two-conductor plug. I'm guessing this last one is composite video, but
I'm just not sure. Have any of you seen this? I figure if I can't find
an adapter at Radio Shack I can probably whip one up in a few minutes,
but I wanted to get your opinions before I go messing around.
John Floren
--
"I've tried programming Ruby on Rails, following TechCrunch in my RSS
reader, and drinking absinthe. It doesn't work. I'm going back to C,
Hunter S. Thompson, and cheap whiskey." -- Ted Dziuba
My PDP11/40 had a high speed paper tape reader/punch when it was new
(PC04 I think). I have the hardware, but not the Unibus card. I think it
failed and was replace with a Facit punch with a serial interface.
So, does anybody have a M7810 they want to get rid of? That is the PC11
interface. I don't know if that is a quad SPC board or a dual that needs
a M105 address board and an M7821 interrupt board. I think it needs the
extra boards.
Any lead or information is welcome...
-chuck
Hi, all,
Also in the same box with the DELQA was an M9313 UET module. It
reminds me that I have a loooongstanding problem with my VAX8300...
the Unibus interface (DWBUA) has been a problem since I moved the 8300
to my house 15 years ago. The machine works perfectly sans Unibus.
It worked in its former location with Unibus. When I first got it
home, I fried the DWBUA module - literally. There was a cracked IC
and a burned trace. Some sort of cabling problem. I have replaced
the cables, replaced the module (so except for the paddle card, pretty
much a new system), and the last time I fired it up, I didn't get
smoke, but it didn't come up as a Unibus.
I have all the standard install docs and such. The normal arrangement
is to have either some sort of DD-11 Unibus backplane in your BA32 CPU
chassis *or* have long cables off the back of the VAXBI backplane to
an external BA-11 with a standard DD-11DK or DD-11CK. I have the
external BA11, the same one that was used with the 8300 in its former
home. The "Unibus in" spot is filled with a paddle card that accepts
the 4 cables from the user-defined area under the DWBUA module. The
Unibus terminator *must* be a UET. The firmware on the DWBUA looks
for it. I can tell from inspecting the BIIC registers on the DWBUA
that my module is unhappy somehow with the UET. I have, now, 4 UETs.
I think the last time I tested things, one or two gave me different
BIIC-register results than the rest, suggesting that there are actual
hardware problems with one or more of my UETs. The one I found
tonight has probably not ever been plugged into a backplane by me,
given what else I found in the box (*nothing* in the box has been
plugged in since the box came home).
What would help me increase my confidence about my testing procedure
is how to actually *test* a UET. I have enough different sorts of
hardware that I don't think I would have to get anything new to set up
any sort of software test. I have close at hand an 11/04 and an
11/750, and can lay hands on various Unibus PDP-11s and an 11/750
without leaving town. The piece of the puzzle that I'm missing (and
always have) is how to test it.
AFAIK, it's a terminator and several loopback registers, but the
specific nature of them is unknown to me. I presume that the
termination is likely to be robust and probably not faulty - it's
probably a problem with a bus driver/receiver or perhaps with some
sort of internal register that the DWBUA firmware is writing to or
reading back. There are a number of DEC-specific ICs, a lot of 74LS
parts, some Nat'l Semi and AMD parts, and a few DIP resistor packs.
There's one empty 24-pin 0.6" socket (which is empty on all the UETs
I've seen, so it's either some sort of option or a test plug for some
other use), and no jumpers what so ever. There are nine 8641 Unibus
interface chips, but fortunately, I have a stack of those from
COMBOARD spares. There are five DC013s, but I have those from
COMBOARDs, too (two per board, socketed, thankfully).
Before anyone suggests grant jumpers, I used to make dual-height grant
modules. I always populate every slot with one so I don't have to
worry about NPR (and because they are easier to remove than genuine
G727 knucklebusters).
I could probably figure out whatever I needed to from the UET
maintenance printset (which I don't have handy, unfortunately), but
I'm hoping that someone on the list has some experience that goes
beyond just plugging one in and seeing no errors from the system.
Perhaps someone has read a Field Service bulletin that talks about
this module and perhaps they remember some useful fragment of the
title or has a copy of it handy. I don't *think* either the primary
or secondary Unibus adapters for the 11/750 care if there's a UET or
even if they can directly tell there's a UET, and that's the system I
have the most experience with. There may be some simple sort of ODT
sequence that I could tickle the Unibus with and see clearly that "bit
4 is stuck" or something like that. If not, reading diagnostic source
could be revealing about how it interacts with the UET registers.
Thanks for any helpful tips and pointers. I miss having the Unibus on
the 8300 - I can run and test COMBOARDs on it, which is one of the
reasons I want to get it working - so I can go through the pile of
stuff in the basement and scrap out the boards that didn't work then
and aren't likely to work now. I have a few VAXBI COMBOARDs still, so
one "fun" thing one can do is hook any two boards back-to-back through
a (synchronous) modem eliminator (one board is told to be the
"central", the other is the "remote") and move files around and
exercise the software by pumping bytes from one process to another -
you don't "need" a second machine to demonstrate HASP or 3780 (though
it can be easier to explain when data are actually *moving* from one
CPU to another).
-ethan
I picked up a Radius "Stage II" Rocket, which appears to be a rather
nifty "accelerator" of sorts which is more or less a second 68040 mac on
a nubus card.
I've found the necessary software to drive it, RocketShare 1.3.1, but it
wants a serial number from me before it'll start up... I don't have the
original software disks, but I'd like to think owning the physical card
would grant me rights to it, since they were only sold together. Anyone
out there have a serial for this they can share?
(Why would software that requires possession of a $3500 card in order to
do anything require a serial number? Gah...)
Thanks,
Josh
Anyone have a manual/schematics for Microangelo MA520 S-100 card ?
All the sites that I bookmarked come up empty.
I'm trying to fix the one I have here.
It's also missing a chip at U5
I don't have a photo of the card either to determine the part#, just the
early revision model.
thanks !
=Dan
--
[ = http://www2.applegate.org/~ragooman/ ]
While picking over the remains of a local office depot that was going
out of business, I managed to get a 500 sheet box of tractor feed
printer paper for $3 (last one). I'm surprised they stocked it.
Although they had box upon box of 2, 3, and 4 part tractor feed paper,
so I guess that's the target audience.
All I need now are tractor feed labels for 3.5" floppy disks. Does
anyone know of a good source?
brian
> From: s shumaker <shumaker at att.net>
> What's the location for this stuff?
Oxnard is about 45 minutes south of where I live. If someone REALLY
wants this stuff, I could stop by to pick up the stuff and drop it off
somewhere to be packed and shipped (I just don't have the time to pack
and ship that much "stuff".)
I have added an 8088 to my Imsai 8080 (using the CompuPro/Godbout 8085/88
dual processor card). I have been all over the internet and have not been
able to find a copy of PL/M86 and associated linker and locator. I know
they must be out there, but none of the CPM86 sites have the tools.
As an alternative, I could use a C86 compiler, but the C language overhead
is huge. The AZTEC C86 compiler creates about 5K of 'stuff' for a main()
with no #includes that simply returns. I suspect there is a ton of DOS
support stuff that gets dragged in. PLM86 is designed more for creating PROM
code, which is what I really need.
Can anyone out there point me in the right direction? PLM86 or a C compiler
that understands the concept of PROMable code?
Jeff Erwin
>
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:05:08 +0100 (BST)
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> I don;t understnad this. How come if I put in my high bid several days
> before the end of the auction does it make others bid higher?
Because many of the buyers on Ebay are not rational--or at least, not what
you and I would consider rational. Rather than deciding ahead of time on
their maximum bid, they check the item over an over again during the
auction and if they've been outbid, they enter a higher bid--usually $2 at
a time, until theirs is the highest bid.
If you come along and outbid them, they will do this again. If there are
two of them, they'll do it to each other in a rather comical fashion (not
so comical if you want the item in question).
The only way to defeat these jokers is to not bid until the last moment,
depriving them of the chance to come nickel and dime you to death.
Even if they don't outbid you, several of their little increments will
drive your price up. Remember, you don't pay your bid amount, you pay a
fixed increment higher than the second highest bid amount.
Of course, from a seller's point of view, these folks are (maybe) useful.
Jeff Walther
Anyone have a manual/schematics for Microangelo MA520 S-100 card ?
All the sites that I bookmarked come up empty.
I'm trying to fix the one I have here.
It's also missing a chip at U5
I don't have a photo of the card either to determine the part#, just the
early revision model.
thanks !
=Dan
--
[ = http://www2.applegate.org/~ragooman/ ]