Hello,
I was referred by a member, Peter Wallace.
We are trying to recover some programs from 9-track backup tapes.
I have a working 92185 drive, and had salvaged a SCSI - Pertec formatted
interface
converter off the back of a Cipher 990 drive at work. The Cipher 990
was total
crap, hardly ever worked. The SCSI converter actually worked for a while, I
was able to read a few blocks of tape (without a proper program to
handle the
format, I just did stuff like
sudo cat /dev/st0
on a linux system, and got info that looked like the first couple
records off a tape.
Then, the converter died, it stopped passing its internal self test.
But, I had proved the
92185 drive is OK. So, now I'm looking for a way to read these tapes.
The best solution
would be an off-the-shelf SCSI - Pertec converter, which were made some
years ago,
but will be hard to find on eBay or such. Another way is to find the
SCSI interface
board for the 92185, but I've never found one to buy. Another way is to
get my
Vaxstation running again, the hard drive blew, so it would take some
effort to get
that back up. I have a Dilog DQ15 controller for it, and if that won't
work, I probably
have another tape controller, too. Another problem with the VAX is I'd
have pull
all the data off the tape over a serial interface, it was last running
VMS 4.7 without
TCP networking.
Anybody got any goodies in the basement, any good ideas of how to
interface it,
etc.?
One other choice is to build my own FPGA Pertec interface. The
formatted Pertec
interface is about as simple as you could imagine, but I'd need to add
an SRAM
buffer to the FPGA to handle up to 64K byte blocks.
Jon
On 2012-03-20 18:00, "Henk Gooijen"<henk.gooijen at hotmail.com> wrote:
> From: "Dave McGuire"<mcguire at neurotica.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 1:58 AM
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Subject: And RA8x too, was Re: RA90 or RA92 disks
>
>> > On 03/19/2012 11:53 AM, Kevin Reynolds wrote:
>>> >> Anyone have working RA90 or RA92 disks that they would like to part with?
>>> >> Send me a private response with pricing and availability. I'm in the US.
>> >
>> > I make the same request, in case someone has a bunch. =) I'm interested
>> > in RA8x drives as well.
>> >
>> > -Dave
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
>> > New Kensington, PA
>
> Haha, I have at least 5 RA82 compete drives, but I really am*not*
> considering shipping them. Pick up only, but this time the chaps
> in the USA are at the wrong side of the big splash.
RA drives, except the RA7x ones, are probably way too expensive to ship
longer distance.
> I also have a few RA90 and RA70 IIRC, I'd have to check.
> I might be willing to sell one or two, but shipping from The Netherlands
> to anywhere will certainly be costly! And My testing will be very limited.
> I have an SA72 which can hold 4 RA9x drives, but I can not test them
> beyond power up to the "READY" state (IIRC). AFAICR, you can not
> simply install the RA70 in the SA72.
Hum. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the SA72 the box that holds up
to 4 RA7x drives? Same physical size as one RA90?
If so, then no, it don't hold 4 RA9x drives. Also, the RA70 works just
fine in it, as do all RA7x drives. RA70 is somewhat unique, though, in
that it was designed to also be usable without any front panel at all.
So there are dip switches on it that can be used to set the unit number.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
I'm trying to identify a battery clip that seems to actually be a lug of
some kind. Would someone please take a look at
http://661.org/tmp/kk2048.jpg and tell me what it might be?
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
At 1:40 -0500 3/20/12, Dave wrote:
> Forth chips are awesome, as is Forth. I've never messed with the
>Novix chips (NC4000 series?) but I have a couple of Harris RTX2010 chips
>here, as well as one of Chuck Moore's new GA144s. 144 hly simple cores
>on a chip! Great stuff. I'll have that on a board soon.
Several of the instruments on payloads we have flown (including 2
instruments going to Pluto) use RTX2010's for the instrument
controllers. (JHU-APL built those instruments (LORRI and PEPSSI) and
did a great job with them and their FORTH software.) So in the
category of out-of-this-world performance and reliability, RTX2010 is
one of my favorite CPU's too. Let us know when you do something cool
with yours!
--
- Mark 210-379-4635
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Asteroids headed toward planets
inhabited by beings that don't have
technology adequate to stop them:
Think of it as Evolution in Fast-Forward.
> From:?Richard <legalize at xmission.com>
> Date:?Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:36:25 -0600
> Subject:?Re: Computer Graphics Museum collection pics
>
>> I didn't see any Calcomp System 25 Workstations in your collection.
>> The RICM has LOTS of them.
>
> I wasn't aware of these systems. ?According to Computerworld, Calcomp
> sold off the division after having an installed base of only 800 units
> in order to avoid competing with its own peripherals customers.
> <http://books.google.com/books?id=3KBPxFKTY6kC&lpg=PA118&dq=calcomp%20%22sys…>
>
> This seems to be a workstation introduced in 1984. ?What kind of
> graphics environment did it have? ?1984 is too early for X11 and also
> I think too early for X10.
The page for the Calcomps is here:
http://www.ricomputermuseum.org/Home/equipment/calcomp-system-25
The RICM has LOTs of documentation on the systems, but have not
powered one on yet.
--
Michael Thompson
FS: Randall Hyde's 1983 "p-Source: A Guide to the Apple Pascal
System". Paperback. Very good condition.
Originally cost $24.95! Yours for just $5 plus postage from US zip
65775.
thanks
Charles
....that could help me out understanding why the exact same program, on the exact same machine, runs 10 times slower under OS-X than it does under either Ubuntu or Windows ?
( Programmed in C with GCC toolchain and using the FLTK toolset. )
Classicmp link : the program is my new release of Emulith, the ETH Lilith emulator.
Jos Dreesen
>> Which was the cause of a bug in the RS232 driver of the original IBM
>> 5150 BIOS... However, I as going to be more charitable in the case of
>> the FDC chip and wonder if it was duw to the fact that IIRC the
>> origianl IBM 3740 format used a sector as the equivalent of a punched
>> card, so only the first 80 chracters were used.
>
>Your charity might be misplaced. The 765 works just fine with 128
>byte sectors in FM mode.
So Chuck ... do you know exactly how this works (as opposed to how it
is documented)?
128 bytes/sector is a special case in the 765 (at least it is documented
as such).
According to the NEC documents, for the sector read and write commands,
if you give it a value of 0 for 'n' (6th byte of the command = Number
of bytes/sector), the actual number of bytes read/written is determined
by the 9th byte written 'DTL' (DaTa Length).
The docs don't go into much detail, and I haven't fooled with it
much - I just set DTL to 128 when I am reading or writing 128 byte
sectors (n=0).
A few questions which are not clearly answered by the docs:
under "READ DATA"
"When N=0, then DTL defines the data length which the FDC must treat as
a sector. If DTL is smaller than the actual data length in a sector, the
data beyond DTL in the sector is not sent to the data bus. The FDC reads
(internally) the complete Sector performing the CRC check, and depending
upon the manner of the command termination, may perform a multi-sector
read operatiohn. When 'N' is non-zero, then DTL has no meaning and should
be set to FF hexidecimal"
under "WRITE DATA" there is mention of N=0 or DTL ... but DTL is shown
as a part of the write commands, and generally described as "DTL - Data
Length - when N is defined as 00, DTL stands for the data length which
users are going to read out or write into the sector".
The read description seems to imply that the FDC "knows" the actual
length of a sector, and only reads the number of bytes specified, while
calculating the CRC over the whole sector.
- How does it "know" the sector size ... the 'n' field in the ID header
is the only place in the sector data that defines the size.
- Does it assume the sector is 128 bytes?
- or Does it actually read (and check CRC) on a smaller sector?
-What is the actual behaviour during write?
- Does it fill the remainder of a 128 byte sector with some value?
- or Does it actually write a smaller sector?
under "FORMAT TRACK" (in the chart notes)
"(3) In MFM mode the FDC cannot perform a read/write/format operation
with 128 bytes/sector (N = 00)"
This implies that 128/MFM simply doesn't work - not even for format
(which you indicated earlier actually does work). Is this a fairly
reliable assumption?
Does DTL have any effect on 128/MFM reads or writes?
You mentioned that 80 bytes get transferred instead of 128. Does
changing DTL make a difference? Or is it always 80 bytes?
Dave
--
dave12 (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
(dot) com Classic computers: http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/
Hi,
I've decided I'd like to reduce down my collection of PDP-11 and PDP-8s and
so I have the following that I may be prepared to part with. All the
machines and parts are located in the UK and at this stage I'm interested
in expressions of interest. Please bare in mind that the machines are for
pickup from the UK and would probably be impactical to ship.
PDP-11/05 - 5.25" form factor
PDP-11/10
PDP-11/15
PDP-11/34
PDP-11/34A
PDP-11/35
PDP-11/40
PDP-11/44
PDP-11/70
PDP-8/E, 3 rack setup with 2 x RK05s, 2 x magtape
PDP-8/L (missing its core memory card)
Various qbus machines (PDP-11/03,11/23,11/73)
Various TU56 drives
PC04 paper tape drive
PC05 paper tape drive
Lots of RL01/02 drives
RK05 drives
All the best,
Toby
We are trying to revive a PDP 8L, and wonder if anyone can
advise us of the equivalent of the DEC1008 transistor, npn
germanium, and also where we might track down any of the following boards:
G228, G826, G624, G221.
Thanks
Charlie Fox
Charles E. Fox
793 Argyle Rd. Windsor Ont.
519-254-4991 N8Y3j8
www.chasfoxvideo.com
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:14 AM, dwight elvey <dkelvey at hotmail.com> wrote:
> ?The one thing I found is that the BASIC on the Apple is really
> slow. It is about the slowest I've ever used. How people put
> up with it I don't know.
Apple Integer Basic was decently fast for the time. Check out say Little Brick Out or Apple Trek.
Yeah Applesoft was mostly a step backwards :-)
Beagle Bros did a lot of cool things in nominal Applesoft BASIC but you know they were peeking and poking and calling machine language routines for most of the cool stuff :-)
If you ever get a chance... Beagle Bag rules :-). "Card Scanner" and "Plenty Questions" were (and are!) my favorite!
Tim.
We have been trying to get working an LP20 printer interface on our
2065. We discovered just today that the issue we have had with bad
control signals was not due to bad boards, but rather was due to the
fact that the bottom 4 segments of the Unibus backplane into which
the control card plugs have no (0) wires wrapped around the pins.
We have the LP20 schematics, but the wiring diagram *for the backplane*
is not included. It also is not to be found on microfiche, although
there is a reference to it, with document numbers. We are specifically
looking for 70-11427, 54-11704, and 50-11703.
If anyone has any of these documents, please let us know ASAP. Otherwise,
a young EE is going to have to spend time with the complete set of LP20
schematics and a spreadsheet program to generate a wire list and re-wire
this thing by guess and by $DEITY, a process that will take several weeks
with no guarantee of correctness of result.
Thanks,
Rich
Rich Alderson
Vintage Computing Sr. Systems Engineer
Vulcan, Inc.
505 5th Avenue S, Suite 900
Seattle, WA 98104
mailto:RichA at vulcan.com
mailto:RichA at LivingComputerMuseum.orghttp://www.LivingComputerMuseum.org/
> From:?Richard <legalize at xmission.com>
> Subject:?Re: Computer Graphics Museum collection pics
>
> The octanes were mostly free and several of the VT100s are "parts for
> spares". ?Also, if you look closely they are not all VT100s. ?There is
> a VT180 in there and also a DECmate.
The VAXserver 8000 on your wanted list should be VAXstation 8000.
I have one, but it is missing the E&S graphics subsystem.
I didn't see any Calcomp System 25 Workstations in your collection.
The RICM has LOTS of them.
--
Michael Thompson
I just started using Google Adwords and I?m trying to figure out how they charge. I just finished the free first time allotment of $75, now I have to add more money.
Does anyone have any experience with this ?
Also I?m looking into the Yahoo/Bing adcenter.microsoft.com. They don?t seem to offer a free first time allotment. Does anyone know of any way to get a free startup allotment ?
Jeff Brace
> (Me)
>>> > > These days, you probably want something more like this:
>>> > > http://www.kryoflux.com/
> (Other chap)
>> > The driver is not only closed-source, but forbids commercial use and
>> > requests donations on top of the EUR100 they charge for about EUR20 of
>> > electronics. The vendor can go fuck themselves. And you can quote me on
>> > that.
> Sorry, chaps, but I really do think you have a bit of a problem here
> that you need to address!
Hi Liam,
I am not sure if it does make much sense to address these polite
"concerns" by the other chap... :)
If the person making this statement can make boards for EUR 20.- each
we'd be delighted to buy from him. For sure such price would be possible
when making 100,000+ boards. We do runs of 100, we have to pay for
electronics recycling (WEEE) registration, we pay tax, etc. I am sure
hobbyists only doing a few boards can get around such things, we can't.
We can't get even near this figure. For the record: the board is EUR
90.-; EUR 100.- is with cables we also have to buy to resell them.
The donations asked for are for the preservation project, maybe it would
have made sense to read the donations text file enclosed. And yes, even
MS Office has student and pro editions available, I don't see anything
wrong in charging companies that can afford to pay more. They keep it
free for private users, at least for our product.
Hello
I have two problems that I need help with, one is an IBM Card
Interpeter model 552 that has 3 broken legs. I think it's cast iron and
one welder told me he could weld the legs back on the unit. Does anyone
if these can be repaired or should we build a box with wheels to set it
in for museum display? The second problem is a set of Apple MAC 20th
Anv pens that have, the pen bodies have turned very soft and sticky and
help on stopping this so that these too can be part of a display?
Thanks,
John
--- On Fri, 3/16/12, Bob Rosenbloom <bobalan at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Could it have been used for testing a processor out in the
> lab before installation on a missile? Note the nice wooden
> sides!
The styling is definitely industrial, not military, which makes
me wonder if there was a commercial version of the D37.
(Univac had an industrial machine what was a repackaged version
of a military processor -- I don't recall the model.) More
likely, there was a repackaged version of the machine for use
in software development, with more appropriate peripherals for
testing code than a gyro platform and a nuke!
--Bill
I'm trying to figure out how to contact the Oliver Klotz who used to sell
HP48 RAM cards on ebay a couple years ago. I'm trying to get my hands on
some and, if possible, schematics for higher-capacity cards.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
On another mailing list that I am on, someone was expressing the
desire to retrieve data off some old BBC Micro floppies to see if it
would be possible to get some of the software running on a Raspberry
Pi. They do not own any machine with a floppy interface.
I suggested KryoFlux as a possible solution.
This was the response:
(Me)
> > These days, you probably want something more like this:
> > http://www.kryoflux.com/
(Other chap)
> The driver is not only closed-source, but forbids commercial use and
> requests donations on top of the EUR100 they charge for about EUR20 of
> electronics. The vendor can go fuck themselves. And you can quote me on
> that.
Sorry, chaps, but I really do think you have a bit of a problem here
that you need to address!
--
Liam Proven ? Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk ? GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com ? Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 ? Cell: +44 7939-087884