<From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
<Intel MCS8i 8080 development system. Well, it was late in the day, my
<money was running out, so I could only buy one of them.
MCS8i, if it was 1972 it could only be 8008 powered as the 8080 was a few
years later. Actually the MCS handle was copyrighted with the 4004. The
8008 was late 1971 and the 8080 a bit over a year later.
<I picked the Intellec. And I am not sorry. Sure it's not going to make me
<rich, but it is _beautiful_ inside. It came with all the manuals
<(schematics and monitor source code), and contains the 8080 CPU board
<(copyright 1972, which must make it a pretty early 8080 design), a couple
<of 4K RAM boards, an EPROM board (1702's, of course) containing the
<monitor, an I/O card, and the programmer for the 1702. The backplane bus
<uses 100 pin 0.125" edge connectors, but the card has a differnt form
<factor (and pinout) to S100 cards
if it was the 100 pin cards (one connector it's the MCS) where the MDS was
multibus with the two backplane connectors. I believe your off on the date
by about two years as the 4004 was 70/71 and the 8008 was first of the
8bitters in late '71 and labeled the MCS-8 and the 8080 was the MCS-80 and
the 8085 followed using the MCS-85. My references are the SIM08/mcs-8 user
manual March 1973. I also I did design work with the 8008 chip in early
'73. The 8080 was not available yet but the intel rep was saying "soon".
It would be nearly 74 before soon arrived.
On the up side yes they were constructed like minis, that was the standard
of the time. Big rugged boxes that had to earn their keep. The MDS I have
is partially gutted as someone pulled the power supplies out but the rest is
intact and last I powered it it ran. FYI the CPU was not even branded in
mine it has some odd penciled ES19-1 on the cpu(8080). I even have the
correct Power One supplies to complete it( same vintage). In time they
could be worth more as they are scarce(low volume production).
<As regards historical interest, well, it has an IOBYTE at address 3,
<divided into 4 2-bit fields that define the console, punch, reader and
<list device - long before CP/M. And there's plenty more things like that.
The first incantation of CPM was on an MDS-800 box and the sources for a
typical bios in the cpm 1.4 and 2 manuals reflect that. IOBYTE is
supported, The docs say it's implemented using the intel standard.
Allison
I've got place to put it and no way to get it there. Maybe someone else
does?
In ba.market.computers, Graham Freeman <graham(a)step.mother.com> wrote:
> FREE - You pick up - VAX 11/750 monster computer. Three units -
>two the size of a full-size home refrigerator and another the size of an
>economy clothes washer. Call or e-mail if you're interested. Units are
>located in Davis, California.
>Graham Freeman graham(a)madre.com
>(530)753-0650 - voice (530)759-4184 - pager
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)crl.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
some guy i bought a mac video card from said he had something called an
apollo workstation. he said it was a 68020/68030 with a 19 inch monitor, can
run *nix, and would only want ~$50 for it. anyone heard of this machine or
know anything about it? he said some local colleges used the machines for
various duties but are obsolete now.
david
At 04:48 AM 11/1/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, Bruce James wrote:
>
>> and my latest find a Amiga 1000 with 1080 moniter and 512k memory
>> anyone have more information on expansion of this computer??
>
>I used an Amiga 1000 as my primary computer for six years. Beautiful
>machine. The darling of my collection. :)
Hi thanks Doug for the reply
I am mostly looking for ways of adding more memory and a hard drive..
picked up a second 3 1/2 external drive and rs1200 modem.
I need a good terminal program and Word Processer..
Also can you give me a hint on what software will work like most stuff for
the a-500 or a-2000??
> I can pull out
>my old manuals and magazines and see what I can dig up. Hopefully I
>haven't made any errors above. :)
>
>Doug Spence
>ds_spenc(a)alcor.concordia.ca
Again thanks Bruce James
kb8kac tech plus
ejames(a)newwave.net
Sure they would.... if the computer was better built then them, then it
would break their head. If it was built worse than them, their head would
only sustain minor damage!!!
----------
From: Kip Crosby <engine(a)chac.org>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Classic Computer Rescue Squad
Date: Saturday, November 08, 1997 3:18 AM
At 23:18 11/7/97 +0000, you wrote:
>I am conviced that a lot of people (probably not on this list) wouldn't
>know a well-designed or well-built computer if it was dropped on them...
Naturally not, they'd be too busy limping around howling.
____________________________________________________________
Kip Crosby, honcho, mechanic and sole proprietor, Kip's Garage
http://www.kipsgarage.com: rumors, tech tips and philosophy for the
trenches
Coming Spring '98: The Windows 98 Bible by Kip Crosby and Fred Davis!
Now.... just for fun, try to get a modern PC, drop it on your toe (A
sacrifice for science) and then watch it break into DOZENS of piece. Chip
out of socket, RAM out of socket, motherboard out of case, power supply out
of case, HDD crashed, disk drive not in a working condition, CD-ROM drive's
laser swears that there's no disk in. They don't make 'em like they used
to!!!
----------
From: Jeff Beoletto <jbeolett(a)ssi.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Classic Computer Rescue Squad
Date: Saturday, November 08, 1997 6:28 PM
On Sat, 8 Nov 1997, Daniel A. Seagraves wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 1997, Hotze wrote:
>
> > At 23:18 11/7/97 +0000, you wrote:
> > >I am conviced that a lot of people (probably not on this list)
wouldn't
> > >know a well-designed or well-built computer if it was dropped on
them...
> >
> > Naturally not, they'd be too busy limping around howling.
> >
>
> I DID THAT! I DID THAT! I successfully managed to crush Jeff Beoletto's
> (One of my friends) toes with
> a PDP-11/44. We were trying to move it sideways. BTW, his foot healed
up
> quite well. And he wasn't limping around, he was curled up in a little
> ball on the floor, cussing a blue streak :) A week ago we were moving
the
> RA81, and I almost did it again...
>
>
>
Seeing how it was me that Dan managed to drop it I can agree to
the limping, and ironically enough it's the same foot that I had broken 3
times in the month before he crushed it. And just yesterday hauling a pc
down to our storagge office on the 5th floor I tripped and fell down the
steps and have just re-broken that very same ankle. Computers are
hazerdous to your health. =+)
In a message dated 97-11-01 22:50:14 EST, Zane Healy put forth:
> I had a good day scrounging the junk stores, first chance I've had in about
> two months to do any serious looking. Among the things I came up with
> today were an Atari 400 and a Atari 800. No Power Supply for either
> though, but then I'm used to that problem. The question is, what on earth
> does it use for a PS? Can I just break out the old Atari 2600 and use
it's
> PS?
on my ps for my atari 400 it says the output is 9v ac but im not sure if the
plug is center positive or not. anyone have tapes for the 400? i have the
"program recorder" but nothing to use in it.
david
<> IE: altair was importnat because it was relatively cheap.
<
<And it spawned a bus architecture that begat the micro-computer
<revolution.
There is something to that but on closer inspection the SWTP, SouthWest
Technical Products SS50 bus was far cheaper and much easier to interface
to. The 100 pin connector was expensive and the redundant signals were/are
a pain. It would take several years to sort out things like bus noise and
compatability. No S100 was a bandwagon and the technology was not at issue
as there were better busses and even at the current time of the altair.
When IMSAI also did it nearly the same people sayw that as important enough
that there were two systems with a similar bus that wasn't too bad to
connect to. Now that is historically significant. When two companies
compete using similar hardware or software that is when it takes
significance as it just became an industry.
As to spawning a revolution, no. That started when the machines became
small enough and cheap enough to be attainable. I still remember in 1970
hanging out in highschool with the guys debating processor wordlength and
actually developing on paper a possible sequencer for one. I could have
had a CIM2000 in '72 (bout the size and performance of an 8e) for $2000!
That was the price of a new ford pickup then! It was there I was in it.
What it did was give us early computer hackers and engineers something
useful without some of the teething cycles of homebrewery. It was also
the industry cranking out components that had potential at attainable
prices. I built my first logic design using a RAM (1101, 256x1) in late
'71 and it was at $23 each. In a year the 2102 (1kx1) would be $16.
Imagine a 1kx8 memory for $128!!! By 1974 that would be 4kx8 for under
$100. This along with TTL prices dropping to pennies for a 7400 gate
made assembling a pdp-8 or somesuch within reach, then the 8008 chip at
$180 (over a weeks take home pay in 1972) made it come a bit closer. A
year before the DEC 1974 Popular Electronics Altair article were the Radio
Electronics articles for the Mark-8 a 8008 machine. So it wasn't a single
event is as much the cumulations of many small events. We would get out
of the basement/garage and started on the next level. Better said we
stopped trying to build a machine and started doing things with it. It
was an accelerator.
There were many of accelerators. There would be many more, the z80 would
be the next one. I also think the 16bit battles that started soon after
would push the envelope some more, as did the 32bit systems. In the middle
of the 8/16 battle graphics started to be seen and that pushed the CPUs
harder and demanded more memory and left a huge vacuum for software.
Allison
<Ehehe... We should build a computer from discrete components, just to
<operate one. And connect it to the Internet. Of course, we'd never
<finish in out lifetimes, and it would fill a room, but it would be awful
<cool!
It's been done and it didn't take lifetime or fill rooms. The machines
were called LINC and they were built in 1964 time frame. Granted the
internet part would take a bit longer.
Over the years many home made machine not microprocessor based have been
built. It is an undertaking but it's not anywhere near impossible.
In reality using moden methods and current discrete parts a better and
smaller machine could be built.
Allison
NS if this is true or not, but it's funny!
The system programmer group writing TOPS-10 use to love fancy
TECO programs and had a weekly contest for them. One guru
working on FORTRAN compilers would read them carefully but never
enter one. They thought he was just concentrating on compilers.
Then one week he submitted a macro that did FORTRAN compilation,
complete with optimization. The TECO program took days to run,
but it worked. Apparently he had written a PDP-10 instruction
set eumlator in TECO and fed the compiler into it!
Hi,
I seem to have a problem. I just got a VAXstation II, and it came with a
whole box of TK50-K tapes. I've a bad feeling that these are blank tapes
though, double bad since I'm suspecting that the system needs to be
reloaded. I'll give a detailed writeup of the problems I'm having later on
(I forgot to make notes when I had it powered up).
The only identificaton on any of the tapes is a small white label with
numbers on it. Some of the numbers on each tape are printed, others hand
written. I've a bad feeling that these are simply backup tapes, in which
case I don't know if they'll do me any good or not. The other possibility
is that they are for something called "RS/1". If anyone can tell me what
these are I'd appreciate it.
Printed Hand Written
------- ------------------
525810 5-0-0 41
525865 6-0-0 (a crossed out 96 with 117 under it)
525869 19-0-1 21
525871 10-1-0 23
525952 9-0-0 81
525959 1-0-0 70
525993 9-0-1 75
526044 23-2-0 57
Since I assume these aren't the VMS distribution tapes, does anyone know
how I can get them? I'm aware of the Hobbiest License for OpenVMS, but I
think it's to new of a version to run on my VAXstation II/RC. There is
also the problem with the Hobbiest version of it comes on CD-ROM. All the
OS manuals that I've got are for MicroVMS/VMS 4.4
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)ix.netcom.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| For Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
| For the collecting of Classic Computers with info on them. |
| see http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/museum.html |
At 06:33 PM 11/6/97 -0500, you wrote:
>I wonder how many non - PC compatibles have used Intel 8088 or 8086 chips. I
>have heard of a machine called an "ACT Apricot", which is said to have had
>voice recognition and a GUI. Could someone tell me about it and others? My
>reasoning is that there are lots of neat things that could be done on an
>8088, but not with a DOS system.
One of the first computer jobs I had was running* a CompuPro 8/16 under
MP/M-16(?). It was an S-100 box with 5 or so terminals. I forget what it
originally had as a processor but we upgraded shortly after I arrived to a
80286/8085 dual processor CPU board.
*Note: this system was so rock solid and self-sustaining that I'm grossly
exagerating here. I wrote some programs, did some data entry, and turned it
on/shut it down. Piece of cake.
P.S., I stumbled across a site that might offer insight into this question.
It's at <http://www.mygale.org/08/samurai/> and offers a listing of
computers by microprocessor (as well as other ways). Only problem is it's
in french. 8^)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
sinasohn(a)ricochet.net that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
Hi Daniel:
Attached is the QD21 manual in a gzipped tar archive format. If you need
ASCII I'll resend it.
Kevin
At 10:52 AM 97/11/08 -0600, you wrote:
>On Sat, 8 Nov 1997, Kevin McQuiggin wrote:
>
>> Yep, you need one. You can use a standard PC cable and ignore the twisted
>> connector, or simply cut and resolder the twisted portion. This works
for me.
>
>I already have a straight-through.
>
>>
>> Here's the plan. Get the drive specs from the IBM web site (this will be
>> tough, their sites are, in my experience, very hard to navigate), and grab
>> a copy of the QD21 manual that explains each of the required parameters.
>> There are copies available online, I can email it to you if necessary.
>>
>
>Email would be good, I've tried looking for the manual but had no luck
>finding it.
>
>> Boot your machine to the chevron prompt, then start up the QD21 firmware.
>> Hopefully you'll have the "newer" menu driven version, if not then you'll
>> have to set up some tables in memory as described in the manual.
>>
>
>I do have the menus. I can get that far.
>
>> The QD21 has a "read disk parameters from device" setting, I'd try that
>> first to see if it works for your drive. I've have mixed success with
>> non-DEC drives on this one. If it works then you're away to the races, just
>> format from the QD21 menus and then INIT DUxx from VMS or whatever's on
>> your VAX.
>
>VAX? The QD21 is in a PDP-11/23+.
>
>>
>> If not then you'll have to enter a bunch of parameters from the drive
>> specs, plus some that you can calculate from the specs as stated in the
>> manual.
>>
>
>OK
>
>> The drive select jumper on the drive must generally be set to "drive select
>> 2". If you're getting no response this may be the problem. The cable must
>> not be of the twisted variety. Make sure your cable polarity is right, etc.
>> etc.
>>
>> I have had success with IBM ESDI drives and the QD21, just keep fiddling
>> and you'll get it going!
>
>That's the usual plan...
>
>> I hope this helps,
>
>If you really have the manual, it will!
>
>
>
>
At 00:02 08-11-97 PST, Tim Shoppa intoned (in response to Dan Seagraves):
>I'm going to make a guess that you're talking about DEC RX33 (5.25"
>half-height drives) or DEC RX50 drives (two 5.25" drives in a full-height
>5.25" form factor) hooked to a RQDX3 controller. If you can specify
>that you're talking about one or the other, you'll get more specific
>answers :-)
<snip>
>A RQDX3 is incapable of formatting RX50 floppies, but it is capable
<snip>
Excuse me, but this does not make sense to me. I have an RX50 and RQDX3 in
my MicroVAX II, and it is perfectly happy formatting RX50 floppies. How do
you think I got that wonderful tape copying program onto the hard drive? ;-)
For my part, Tim, I'd be very disappointed if you unsubscribed from the
list. I value your insights very much.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin2(a)wizards.net)
http://www.wizards.net/technoid
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
<> Ok, first of all I'm pretty amazed at the 3rd grade level of
<> mentality being demonstrated by the whiners complaining about my
<> "foul" language.
Sam, it's not a big thing but there are a few women and I for one really
don't like it. I'm no prude and there are time I can turn the air blue
but I try to avoid it unless there is pain associated with it.
< There's more to a machine that makes it historically important
<than how many were sold or produced. Was the STRETCH important (a
<half dozen or so)? How about the PDP-10 (under a thousand)? Mass
<marketing is not the gauge of importance, especially in a social
<context. Remember - the individuals who designed the machines that
<_were_ mass marketed were brought up knowing about computers, and
<those machines most certainly weren't mass-market devices.
I for one see the imporant machine as those that influenced the direction
of computing. This could be by putting computers where they werent before
or by introducing/solidifying a concept.
IE: altair was importnat because it was relatively cheap.
IE: the PC was impostant be cause IBMs entry in to the market that was
dominated by TRS-80, APPLE and friends somehow ligitemized destop
sized computer to the masses.
< Whether Novas are "wanted" is immaterial to the argument. Folks are
<now virtually unaware of a piece of history, and an important one at
<that. It's also a piece of history that's fast disappearing, which is
<a rotten shame.
That is the point!
< Do multi-thousand dollar speculative prices on Altairs make them
<more "historic" or "valuable" than a PDP-5 (predecessor of the -8)?
<There's more to be calculated into a "value" than the current market
<price, which all too frequently is out of line with reality.
People miss the Mark-8 (8008 based) that preceeded it by nearly a year.
< Nope. Nobody did. That's one of the reasons I have respect for
<the man. He knows machines worth saving, and is willing to take the
<time and (not incosiderable) effort to do so.
Right! To make a point there are few machines with much value other
than history. Those that collect are like archiologists, few will
discover the missing link but the rest will flesh out history
surrounding it. It's that history, the society, hackers, scientists
that are important.
<> If the majority of kids in America had a picture of a Nova tacked to
<> their wall, the newspapers might have run a story on one.
<
< Do you know who I'm speaking of? Hint: he designed one of the early
<mass-market computers that you prize so highly.
What's missed is many Novas were used in places like malls to make T-shirts
with pictures on them (at least in the northeast). They were there on the
bottom shelf doing it. This was at a time when altair, Imsai and apples
were the thing.
The altair... I have one. My opinion of the design is simple, it can
serve well as an example of how not to do it.
Allison
I'm not sure about the actual jumper settings, but if you have web access,
I would check out http://www.computercraft.com for more info. They have
everything from benchmarks to how to upgrade a 486.
Ciao,
Tim D. Hotze
----------
From: Daniel A. Seagraves <dseagrav(a)bsdserver.tek-star.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Subject: Hard drive jumper settings required.
Date: Monday, November 03, 1997 4:44 PM
I'm going to attach this to the QD21, so I need to reset the jumpers.
IBM 115MB ESDI drive, type 0669, sequence # 104040108
There are 6 DIP switched behind the drive terminator. I'm told I have to
use a straight-through cable, so I went and got one.
The drive does nothing. With a crossover cable (Where the pins are
crossed, a normal PC cable) it went click-clunk, click-clunk, and did
nothing. The drive is known good. (I pulled it from a PS/2 which we
upgraded to a SCSI drive)
If anyone works at Advanced Technology Services, the drive came from Cat
origionally and has the ATS sticker "ATS-444862"
Another barcode on top of the drive by the air inlet says "B1AF3092241"
< I was at an auction last Saturday, and immediatly started to drool over
<this beautiful piece of equipment. It was an Intergraph 250 (No, I have
<never seen one before) and it look to be in excellent shape. It was about
<top 7 feet wide, by about 3 feet deep, and 5 feet high, with a beautiful
<blue and white finish. On one side, behind a large black panel, was four
Sounds like a Intergraph/DEC 8650 or in that realm that was from the mid
'80s. Intergraph would take DEC machines and add their stuff to it to
make hopped up machines for their business applications. The drives were
SMD and the controller was of Intergraph design. Nice machine and there are
a bunch around in use.
Allison
Is there a way to disable the M8190 console SLU so as to use another
serial in it's place? The bulkhead adapter for the SLU has been
cannabalized to fix another machine, and I want to get this one running.
I have the DLV-11J that was in my 11/23, I plan to use it.
Any ideas?
<> <Ever read, say, _Soul of a New Machine_?
<>
<> Good read, still have my copy!
<>
<Me too. But I've also got a hard-cover now!
I was given mine when it was first releassed and is hard cover.
<<This prompted me to dig up a Nov 81 copy of a mag called Datamation
<whose feature article was a history of the Route 128 companies and a
<companion piece "Rte128's new Wave Startups" which included Apollo,
<Stratus, SOLV-vation, and the 'revamped"Charles River Data Systems..
<The push was on to 32bit and Data General was offering it"s
<"brand-new" medium-priced supermini,the MV 6000 whose price was on
Therein lies a peice of the story. From 79 to recent I and friends worked
for companies involved in the 128 race. It's amazing how few are left and
how different some are.
< Another "cute" blurb, "CP/M-86 is the 16 bit version of the de facto
<industry standard microcomputer operating system, CPM. Once a user
<slips the 8-inch floppy containing CPM-86 into a (IBM) Displaywriter,
<an entirely new world of data processing will open up on the typist's
<desk." Sounds almost pornographic. ; ^ ))
Call that a snapshot in time before the PC explosion.
What I miss is hearing about Honeywell, RCA, Univac, Borroughs and Sperry
to name a few here in the USA where it started. There are machines that
were unique than and by standards now made by these companies. A example is
the RCA machines from what little I know were patterned after the TX series
of mit. I'd love to hear more.
Allison
On Sat, 08 Nov 1997 02:38:31 -0300, Mr. Richards made the following
statements:
> I have to tell you all about the sad fate of a beautiful machine.
> [...] It was an Intergraph 250 [...]
> I want to add to my misery by finding out exactly what it was, what
> it's speed was, what it was comparable to.
The brains of the machine were a MicroVAX II (KA630-AA). Disks
were primarily Fujitsu 8" Winchester drives controlled by an Inter-
graph proprietary controller called an "InterBus File Processor".
A SCSI tape drive was standard on the 250, also of Fujitsu manufacture
if I recall correctly.
A nice enough little box, but hobbled for the hobbyist community
by the proprietary controller for which no schematics of firmware
listings will _ever_ be available from Intergraph.
______________________________________________________________________
| | |
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:carl.friend@stoneweb.com | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~engelbrt/carl/museum | ICBM: N42:22 W71:47 |
|________________________________________________|_____________________|
I picked up an Osborne-1 last night, but no software. Is anyone willing to
cut me a copy of some 5 1/4" CP/M operating system and utility disks?
I'd gladly replace the disks supplied...
Thanks in advance,
-- Tony Eros
Internet Consultant - Financial/Pharma Services Practice
Digital Equipment Corporation
I wondering if anyone had any info on the Laser 128ex. I lugged an EGA
monitor to a friend of mine this week with the intentions of trading it for
a couple of hard drives, as I really need to clear some space (two bedroom
apartment, and I'm sleeping on a loveseat in the living room). Anyway, when
I got down there, I noticed the Laser on a shelf. I have never heard of this
machione before, so of course I had to have it right then and there :)
It resembles an Apple//c in layout; CPU, keyboard and 5 1/4" floppy in one
unit. As a bonus, the power supply I got with it also fits, my Apple//c. I
also noticed that on the bottom, there is a switch for LCD screen. The
similarities between this and the Apple makes me wonder if this wasn't some
sort of copy.
Does anyone have any ideas about this machine, specificaly I would like to
know how to break into the BASIC. On the Apple, I press CRTL and reset, but
this doesn't work on the Laser.
I would appreciate any help. Thanks in advance...
----------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________Live from the GLRS
The Man From D.A.D
----------------------------------------------------------------