Most of the tandy printers where serial. Does the DMP have a DIN cable, a
D cable or a Centronics cable. Most had a serial DIN cable and you would
have to make a custom cable that went from a PC"s serial port to the DIN on
the printer. If it's a D connector you should be able to use a straight
through serial cable. Getting it to talk, will be the next interesting
part. Im not sure how they communicated, but you might be able to get at
least text out of it. Let me know how it comes out.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Deschamps <erdesch(a)HEMPSEED.COM>
To: Multiple recipients of list COCO <COCO(a)PUCC.BITNET>
Date: Friday, January 02, 1998 4:45 PM
Subject: Radio Shack TRS-80 DMP 100 Printer info needed.
>I was wondering if I can connect my DMP-100 to a PC through the parallel
>port in the back and if I need a special cable ? According to the manual,
>this port was made for TRS-80 only. It doesn't talk about PC in the manual.
>If someone was able to connect it to a PC, please let me know how and which
>driver did you use in Windows?
>
>I was wondering if someone has a spare cable to connect this printer to a
>TRS-80 COCO II or III (using the DIN connector) to giveaway ? If not, which
>part number
>do I need to order from Radio Shack ?
>
>Many thanks!!!
>
Um, I'm not sure what you just said, but:
a) I'm sure this has nothing to do with old computers, unless God stands for
Graphic Output Device :)
b)I think you mean that if one tries to disprove Jesus, they automatically
God's followers, but,once again, I'm not sure
Original Message:
<< > Two thousand yeare since Bethlehem and still we hear the lie,
> that after years of hopes and fears the best part's when we die.
Yup, that's what I used to think. I felt sorry for all those poor
misguided fools, Christians. (Didn't occur to me that some of them
were very bright, and very skeptical, and had spent years studying
to seek truth, & only then became Christians.)
And then one day, I was forced to examine my 'beliefs', & was a
little surprised to see that they were assumptions only. Bummer.
So I had to check it out for myself. Sure is a ton of info out
there, some good, some not, but anyway I was finally able to go
1%, & God went the other 99.
So I now believe that anyone who diligently tries to disprove the
teachings of Jesus, or seeks truth or whatever terminology you can
live with -- with any kind of open mind at all (none of us can truly
have an open mind, all we can do is try) -- will become His followers.
Go and do likewise. Don't be chicken.......
Regards,
---mikey >>
At 01:06 AM 1/3/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>> A LINC!!???!?!?!
>>
>
>Wirehead - Anthony Clifton
>
>PS: Notice I haven't WHERE I'm getting the stuff from. I'll just keep
>THAT little secret until they're safely in my basement. ;-D
>
>
That's even better, that way it will be all packed and ready. Just tell
us where your basement is :-)
At 10:01 AM 1/3/98, you wrote:
> While we're on the subject, I'll throw in my gripe. Why can't we copy
>old computer manuals? Most of the computers and software are worthless
>with the manuals. HP and the other companies gave up all
>sales/support/service of these things years ago, why should they care if
>we copy manuals that they don't sell any more?
They care because they can keep a xerox copy of those manuals around to sell
to us for the unholy figure of $35-$50 if someone ever actually asks them
for one. (Not naming names, but one company that does this rhymes with Sandy.)
- John Higginbotham
- limbo.netpath.net
I am just starting to use this 1985 Z80 computer and wonder if
anyone else has one. It has a built in 3" (not 3.5") drive.
Its the last of the Sinclair computers. It also runs CP/M 3.0.
I'd be interested if anyone knows about a UK company called
Spectre Communications that made a plug in RS232 board and
comunication package for it.
Don Walterman
Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net> wrote (after me):
> >Every once in a while I see a flavor of 9000/200 that is built into or
> >around an HP 2382 terminal housing: small, beige skin, brown bezel around
> >9" monochrome CRT.
>
> That sounds more like the 9000 216 aka 9816. Look at
> "http://www.intellistar.net/~rigdonj/hp9816.jpg" and see if that looks like
> what you're thinking of.
Yep, that is what I was thinking of.
> This was a box about the size of a 9133 disk
> drive and had 8? expansion slots in the back and no attached monitor or
> keybaord. it said 9000 217 on the front top corner.
Hmm. I'm going to have to pull my old /320 out to look at it, but
that was about the same cross-section, only deeper than the 9133. The
CPU plugs into the bottom slot (and has a special connector), then
there are several DIO slots above it.
> BTW Do you know where I can get a keyboard for a 9816? Do you know if any
> of the other keyboards will work on it? I have a bunch of HP-HIL keyboards
> and they use that same style connector. I'm not sure if it's the same size
> or number of contacts though. I do know that the 9816 keyboard has one
> latch on top and the HIL keybaord has two latchs, one on each side.
The 9816 keyboard in your picture looks something like the
small/standard 2382 keyboard, except the 2382 keyboard has wider
function keys across the top row (typical HP terminal) and doesn't
have the knob.
The 2382 keyboard had a similar modular connector and was not HP-HIL.
I don't think I'd chance it. You might want to ask on
comp.sys.hp.{hardware,misc} and see if anyone there knows.
[Integral PC]
> I have heard it called a 9807, ONCE. It's also shown as a 9807 in the
> '87 catalog. The IPC is one of my favorites! I have two of them and lots
> of software. If you run across any IPCs or accessories or software, I'M
> INTERESTED!
Yep, they are fun boxes. Unfortunately the only spare bit I have for one
right now is a 256KB RAM card.
Hmm, what would I like to find? Technical BASIC. I gather it installs into
the ROM cartridge in the back of the machine. Mine just seems to have the
System V version of HP-UX for the IPC.
-Frank McConnell
At 01:11 AM 1/3/98 -0500, you wrote:
>And none of those ganes were ever as good as the "Big-5" series on
>the old TRS-80's with their monochrome 128x48 "graphics". The Linux
>fight is over, it's time for an arcade-game dicksize war. (And I've
>never been good at arcade games).
The best to me back then weren't the arcade games. I mean you have to admit
it's a little hard to conceptualize something in a 128x48 grid. Nope, the
games that did it for me back then were the text parsing adventure games
(infocom, etc.) Although there were some games that never die, and I still
play (Anyone remember Space War?) and of course Combat on the Atari 2600.
I've got a CD full of abandonware games that I have slowly put together from
websites that seem to go down as fast as they come up. There are ancient
games on that CD that I have never played.
<rant>
Which brings up an interesting point: Why do the self appointed software
cops go after software archives of "abandonware" that most of today's
computers usually run too fast anyway? Do these ancient games really hurt
todays software market? Anything 10 years old or older should be
freeware/public domain as far as games are concerned. They don't increase
productivity, and the collectors of these old games aren't doing any harm
are they?
</rant>
- John Higginbotham
- limbo.netpath.net
I don't remember who asked for the part number for the HP 85 printer drive
belt but I finally dug out my service manual and found the numbers. There
are two belts in the printer. One drives the carriage and is PN 1500-0529.
The other drives the paper advance and is PN 1500-0572. If one is bad you
should go ahead and replace both. During the week you can call HP's
automated ordering line at 1-800-227-8164 and order them if they're still
available. Let me know if these are still available and what they cost. If
you can't get them, let me know and I'll open up one of my 85s and measure
the belts and to to match them up with something from Small Parts Inc or
one of the other companies.
Joe
At 02:48 PM 1/2/98 -0600, you wrote:
>get all those pretty colors... (Thank goodness *somebody*'s coloring all
>those boring old black and white movies! 8^)
They used to do that with older games that were originally in 4-color CGA,
going back and redoing them in VGA 256 color. Just a few though. Space Quest
springs to mind...
- John Higginbotham
- limbo.netpath.net
pvhp(a)forte.com (Peter Prymmer) wrote:
> I am brimming with curiosity about the MPE OS: What is it like?
ObAdvocacy: <BIFF> K00L3R THAN L1NUX!!!! </BIFF>
It's stable like a rock, and doesn't need a lot of maintenance. You
want a system that can stay up for a year? Choose MPE.
> Having tried to glean some info from the HP web site I can only
> surmise that the target market is mid to large businesses and
> might be comparable to IBM AS/400 or Mainframe type computing
> environments. Am I right?
Yep, pretty much. Historically, 3000s have been aimed at
transaction-processing environments. There have been efforts to push
3000s into office automation roles but they really didn't stick, both
because PCs got cheap and because 3000s (particularly the classics)
really didn't do interactive character terminal I/O very well.
> If that is the case I am curious: does MPE run with ASCII or EBCDIC
> character sets?
ASCII. But there's some presumption (in many applications, including
some of the configuration tools) that you will be using an HP terminal
that supports block mode, which (approximately) lets the application
use the terminal's memory as a buffer for a form, so that the user
can do his editing in the terminal then transmit the completed form
to the 3000 in a fast block transfer.
> Does MPE support a UNIX like environment - even as an option?
If you're running MPE/iX, yes. :RUN SH.HPBIN.SYS and you will get a $
prompt.
> What is the shell like?
The MPE command interpreter...well, I can't speak for the MPE/iX CI.
I haven't used it enough.
The classic MPE CI is not really like a Unix shell -- there are a
bunch of internal commands that look like they do their own filename
globbing depending on whether they handle filesets or not, there
aren't really pipes (instead there are "message files" which are
sort of record-structured FIFOs with disc-file backing store).
> What is the C compiler like?
For MPE/iX, it's available and seems to be a somewhat modern C compiler
for PA-RISC 1.0. GCC has also been ported to MPE/iX.
At Wollongong, we used a third-party C compiler that sometimes made me
wish SPL supported structure/record declarations. It was a slow compiler,
and it had a really conservative approach to addressing modes...though
I managed to find ways around some of its conservatism.
> Editors?
Well, you get EDIT/3000, which is a line-oriented editor that is
suitable for use on all manner of terminals, even the printing ones.
I believe someone ported MicroEMACS to MPE/iX a while back, and you
definitely get vi with it. There are also several third-party
editors, some in the Interex contributed software library (e.g. QUAD,
which includes a pseudo-screen editing mode) and some commercial
(e.g. Robelle's QEDIT, which lots of 3000 folks swear by).
> How long has it been on the market?
25 years.
-Frank McConnell
At 07:13 PM 1/2/98, you wrote:
> Did you see the ad on there for the KayPro 4 on there for $10,000 !
>Honest! I'm not making this up! Gee, my Altair must be worth millions!
>I wish!
Some yahoo on www.haggle.com had an Apple Lisa listed for $15,000.00. People
collect these old machines, but not for the money, for the nostalgia mostly.
At least that's how it is in my case, although I do use some of my machines
on a daily basis. (Mostly for playing my collection of ancient games that
just seem to run like greased electrons on my Cyrix 200 system. :)
- John Higginbotham
- limbo.netpath.net
classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu, fmc(a)reanimators.org
Subj: Re: Frank Knows his stuff was Re: What is this HP 9000/220?
Frank McConnell wrote:
>I've been doing stuff with HPs for over 20 years now (mostly with
>3000s and HP PCs), and some of it stuck. But I've never worked with
>Series 200s so don't know that much about them, just what I've picked
>up here and there. And I still think I have a lot to learn.
>
>Why do I know about Series 500s? In 1989 I took a job at a little
>company called The Wollongong Group, supporting a product for the HP
>3000 called WIN/TCP for MPE/V. Little did I know, they also had a
>product for the HP 9000 Series 500s called, straightforwardly enough,
>WIN/TCP for HP 9000 Series 500. They expected me to support that too
>-- after all it's all HP stuff, it's all weird/how different can it
>be? (yep, that's how they thought) -- so I did.
<snip>
>-Frank McConnell "I want my MPE" (w/apologies to Dire Straits)
> <fmc(a)reanimators.org>
I am brimming with curiosity about the MPE OS: What is it like?
Having tried to glean some info from the HP web site I can only
surmise that the target market is mid to large businesses and
might be comparable to IBM AS/400 or Mainframe type computing
environments. Am I right? If that is the case I am curious: does
MPE run with ASCII or EBCDIC character sets? Does MPE support a
UNIX like environment - even as an option? What is the shell like?
What is the C compiler like? Editors? In short - what is MPE like?
How long has it been on the market?
Sorry, but I have never personally known anyone/anyplace that runs
MPE, until I came across a UC campus with a web site that several
MPE freeware packages available. However, from that (as well as
any possible newsgroups) it is difficult to determine what the OS
is like for the user/admin/programmer and I would appreciate some
info.
Thanks very much to anyone who can respond.
Peter Prymmer
> I mentioned a while ago that I saw a copy of Apple II visicalc. Well, I
> finally got it. It has all the stuff, and is a 1981 copy. I was wondering
if
> there was a PC version or port for DOS?
Sure was. -- I've got one (no manuals, tho'). I messed with it a
little...works sorta like early Lotus.
IIRC, there was one for the PCjr, too.
manney(a)nwohio.com
In a message dated 98-01-02 17:36:09 EST, you write:
<< Why do I know about Series 500s? In 1989 I took a job at a little
company called The Wollongong Group, supporting a product for the HP
3000 called WIN/TCP for MPE/V. Little did I know, they also had a
product for the HP 9000 Series 500s called, straightforwardly enough,
WIN/TCP for HP 9000 Series 500. They expected me to support that too
-- after all it's all HP stuff, it's all weird/how different can it
be? (yep, that's how they thought) -- so I did.
>>
Oh cool. from 89-92, I managed 2 500's, a 540 and a 560. I don't remember
the exact differences between the two. but, they were great. we had the
wollongong software on them.
my favorite was the 400 Mb had disk that looked and sounded like a dishwasher.
Kelly
At 03:32 PM 1/2/98 -0800, you wrote:
>Here is one that I got today from someone offering "Rare Apple Computers
and Hardware". Seems that the prices are about as far disconnected from
reality as his web page. It's there, but has no content other than a splash
screen.
>Apple Macintosh 512K - 200.00
I feel so stupid... I sold a Mac 512ke for $40 about 3 months ago. Man, I
better go update my prices... I'm sitting on a fortune!!!!
- John Higginbotham
- limbo.netpath.net
Two quick questions:
1. What is a disk substitution for a DEC RX-50 diskette?
2. How can you get a DECmate terminal working as a regular "dumb"
terminal in stead of a word processor?
TIA!
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
In a message dated 98-01-02 20:03:36 EST, you write:
<<
> Right. And if you ran MS Works 2.0 for DOS on an XT, which was
unfortunately
> what had to be done for a while with me, it would show characters maybe a
> second after they are type, especially on a Leading Edge Model D, which
was
> first priority to replace among the 8 XTs that were slowly being phased
out.
I've used MSW on XT's (even a PC), and I don't remember its being all that
slow. What were you doing? Editing War & Peace?
> MS-DOS edit or Windows Write works very much faster. (Don't get me wrong
here,
> I love the Leading Edge Model D, it's just so damn slow)
I think they're pretty quick (faster than the IBM XT, anyway!)
>>
Actually, It took a few minutes for works even to start up! We were editing
one-page documents. The Leading Edge Model D I have had two experiences with.
In one case it was ENIAC-speed (clock? oh, yeah, it's 3:30!) and the other it
was 286-speed.
Another thing: I saw a copy of Lotus 123 for the Rainbow 100. Anyone want
that?
In a message dated 98-01-02 19:06:16 EST, you write:
<< Actually I think VisiCalc WAS the early version of Lotus 123. I don't
remember all the names but VisiCalc was originally developed by some guy as
a school project. One of the other students liked it and bought the rights
to it for something like $100 and formed Lotus Developement Corp (I think
that's the right name). It was first marketed as VisiCalc and was
virtually unchanged from the original project software except for being
ported to different systems. Later the name was changed to Lotus 123 and
the product was further developed. Another case of the inventor ending up
sweeping floors and a promoter becoming rich with someone else's idea.
(Tesla >> George Westinghouse) (Henry >> Oliver Winchester) etc etc. >>
Joe <rigdonj(a)intellistar.net> wrote:
> Frank knows his HPs! I know the 200 series pretty well but he's got all
> of them down pat.
I've been doing stuff with HPs for over 20 years now (mostly with
3000s and HP PCs), and some of it stuck. But I've never worked with
Series 200s so don't know that much about them, just what I've picked
up here and there. And I still think I have a lot to learn.
Why do I know about Series 500s? In 1989 I took a job at a little
company called The Wollongong Group, supporting a product for the HP
3000 called WIN/TCP for MPE/V. Little did I know, they also had a
product for the HP 9000 Series 500s called, straightforwardly enough,
WIN/TCP for HP 9000 Series 500. They expected me to support that too
-- after all it's all HP stuff, it's all weird/how different can it
be? (yep, that's how they thought) -- so I did.
Somewhere along the way I decided I wanted a windowing environment
that could handle HP terminal emulation on my desk, and after fooling
around a bit with PCs I saw some guy up in Berkeley trying to be rid
of a 9000 Series 320. So I bought it, and it was good. That sat
there 'til early 1994 when I got retreaded into a Windows device
driver kind of guy. Now I guess it's part of my collection -- it sits
in the storage closet.
> FWIW the 9000 Vectra series computers (or some of them anyway) used
> 80286 CPUs and were MS-DOS compatable.
9000 Vectra? My recollection of the Vectra family is that it's all
IBM-compatibles (well, mostly, I remember the earliest Vectras and
they were about 99% if you allowed for the HP-isms that snuck in, like
the HP-HIL interface for the keyboard and mouse, the HP keyboard with
the f1-f8 keys across the top, and the funky HP Multimode MDA/CGA
display adapter) and never was a part of the 9000 family.
Though I think I remember something about a coprocessor card (set?) you
could stick in ISA slot(s) to run Rocky Mountain BASIC. Of course HP
would have sold that in/for Vectra boxes.
> NOW My turn. Does anyone know exactly what a 9000 217 model is? I found
> one but I've neverheard of it before and it's not in any of my catalogs.
Every once in a while I see a flavor of 9000/200 that is built into or
around an HP 2382 terminal housing: small, beige skin, brown bezel around
9" monochrome CRT. I think some of the ones I've seen were hooked up
to 91[23]x disk drives, and can't remember whether the processor was in
a similarly-sized box or in the terminal. Could that be it?
I think the HP Integral PC was also the HP 9000/207 though I don't know
if it was ever sold under that name.
-Frank McConnell "I want my MPE" (w/apologies to Dire Straits)
<fmc(a)reanimators.org>
<> > second after they are type, especially on a Leading Edge Model D, w
I have a Leading Edge model D here in active use. Nice machine and
locked (no turbo) to 4.77mhz. Mine has had a hard disk controller
added and a souped up floppy controller to do 1.44 3.5". That and a V20
it's stock and runs well.
Save fpr I'm using it for other things I've had Win3.0 running on it
and it's not that bad considering.
Currently it has Wordperfect works on it and it's very useful for text
work.
Allison
At 11:38 PM 12/31/97, you wrote:
>You should have read the ad. It says "WANTED TO BUY AN IMSAI COMPUTER WITH
>OR WITH OUT MANUALS. ALSO ALTAIRS, PROLOG, KIMS, SBC-80-10 BY INTEL YEARS
>1975-1982 DECS, JUPER-II BY WAVE MATE. I WILL PAY UP TO 200+ FOR CSOME
I should have actually read the ad. I'm *really* sorry to have wasted
everone's time with this.
>Classifieds2000 is a waste of time IMO.
I'm beginning to think so too.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
I think that MAI produced an accounting system "solution" for businesses
consisting of a multi-user computer system and proprietary accounting
software.
I remember running into them occasionally during field audits of some of
our clients.
Rich Cini/WUGNET
<nospam_rcini(a)msn.com> (remove nospam_ to use)
ClubWin! Charter Member (6)
MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
============================================
In a message dated 98-01-02 16:38:35 EST, you write:
<< >When I first ran winders it was on a 386/16 with 4mb of ram
> it seemed fast enough to do a lot of useful work.
>
>
> Allison
Well, yeah. But, that was when a Winders program came on a couple of
floppies, before the code -- and graphics -- bloat. A program, then, did
less and had less junk (toolbars and suchlike).
Still, some things _have_ improved in speed. My Corel Draw 3 on my laptop
handles text in a rather leisurely fashion, wheras Corel Draw 7 is quite
snappy.
manney(a)nwohio.com >>
Right. And if you ran MS Works 2.0 for DOS on an XT, which was unfortunately
what had to be done for a while with me, it would show characters maybe a
second after they are type, especially on a Leading Edge Model D, which was
first priority to replace among the 8 XTs that were slowly being phased out.
MS-DOS edit or Windows Write works very much faster. (Don't get me wrong here,
I love the Leading Edge Model D, it's just so damn slow)
> True story.
>
> When my sone was about 5, he had very interesting taste in TV shows. It
> went something like this:
>
> - If it is animated, watch it.
We all love Windows 95 :)
> - If it is live-action in color, change the channel.
We all love Windows 95 :)
> - If it is live-action in B&W, watch it for a while to see if it's funny.
Not that strange. Remember that Charlie Chaplin, The Three Stooges, and MS-DOS
1.0 are the three all-time comedy classics!
>
> Roger Ivie
> ivie(a)cc.usu.edu