Data General has a neat "museum" of influentional systems. Find the
personal computer section at:
http://www.dg.com/about/html/microprocessors.html
Here's the machines they feature (with pictures)
MITS' Altair 8800 (1974)
Apple II (1977)
Tandy TRS-80 (1977)
Osborne 1 (1981)
IBM PC (1981)
Compaq Transportable (1982)
IBM PCjr (1983)
Data General's DG/One (1984)
Sun 3/50 workstation (1986)
Data General's AViiON AV 9500 SMP server (1989)
-Mike
Thanks. I'm in Ohio, 44857
As I understand it, you have a complete system, with a (fuzzy?) monitor? Is
there a HDD, or is that the bernoulli? Is there software?
Thanks,
manney(a)nwohio.com
----------
> From: classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu
> To: Manney
> Subject: Re: Stuff, while we're at it...
> Date: Sunday, February 01, 1998 9:51 PM
>
> Manny:
>
> Sorry I haven't responded, I've been in Vegas since friday am.
>
> The MAC stuff is yours, if you desire. The only exception is the 5mb
> bernouli which was spoken for (but not yet taken) if that works out it's
> gone. I do have another 20MB bernouli, but I need the enclosure, you
> can have the drive though, if you like.
>
> Lemme know you're address and I'll check the shipping and send you back
> a total for your decision.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike Allison
>
> PG Manney wrote:
> >
> > I'd be interested in the Mac stuff
> >
> > manney(a)nwohio.com
Can anyone point me to an on-line reference showing the necessary
voltages for programming various EPROMs? I'm especially interested
in the oldies-but-goodies: 2708, 2716, 2732, and 2764's. In
particular, it seems some of them want 25v while others want only
21v, and I suspect that even the same chip number from different
manufacturers may want different voltages.
Thanks,
Bill.
>Now that you've said that -- how about a Centronics-type connector, with
>the female end on the end of the monitor cable, and the male end recessed
>into the card bracket, where it would just be another feature connector of
>sorts? This exact combination, when used for parallel printers or external
>SCSI, is almost indestructible.
One problem with that is that the average centronics connector is wider
(thicker?) than the standard PC slot allows for. I believe this may be
true of Mac slots as well.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- O-
Uncle Roger "There is pleasure pure in being mad
roger(a)sinasohn.com that none but madmen know."
Roger Louis Sinasohn & Associates
San Francisco, California http://www.crl.com/~sinasohn/
Those of you who have been dreaming of your own Kennedy 9400, take a
look at this...
-=-=- <snip> -=-=-
Path:
Supernews70!Supernews73!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!WCG!news.oru.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.mathworks.com!mvb.saic.com!info-pdp11
From: Dan Lanciani <ddl(a)deas.harvard.edu>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.pdp-11
Subject: Kennedy 9400 tape drive available
Message-ID: <199802040522.AAA06277(a)endor.das.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 1998 00:22:34 -0500 (EST)
Organization: Info-Pdp11<==>Vmsnet.Pdp-11 Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List
Lines: 11
Xref: Supernews70 vmsnet.pdp-11:9192
I have a Kennedy 9400 drive here (Gloucester, MA) for the taking. This
is a tri-density upright unit with formatted Pertec interface. It worked
the last time I used it, but, as I look at it now, it appears that the
backup
battery on the CPU board has failed. It would likely be necessary to run
through the calibration procedure after replacing the battery. (I recall
doing the calibration before, so it must be in the manual. These drives
have an RS232 port to control the diagnostics.) I also have an extra
drive
(with mechanical problems) for spare parts; they should probably go
together.
Dan Lanciani
ddl(a)harvard.edu
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, SysOp,
The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fido 1:343/272)
kyrrin2 {at} wiz<ards> d[o]t n=e=t
"...No matter how hard we may wish otherwise, our science can only describe
an object, event, or living creature, in our own human terms. It cannot possibly
define any of them!..."
> Not quite (at least for PS/2's). PS/2 models with a number lower than
> 50 (ie, mods 25, 30, 35, 40) have an ISA (or is it EISA?) bus.
25 and 30 are ISA, anyway.
> Am I the only person
> to have been brought up with a Keuffel & Esser ivory covered mahogany
> rule? Also, what was the name of the manufacturer who made a bamboo core
> rule?
K&E made a bamboo one, too. (At least mine looks like bamboo -- it
certainly isn't mahogany).
I was told that bamboo has a low coefficient of linear expansion, which is
why they used it.
manney
> >Slide Rule Trading Post
> >http://www.comcen.com.au/~adavie/slide/
> >
> >On my site you will find a link to JavaSlide on the main menu. That's a
> >JAVA slide rule I wrote some while back, so you can reminisc even if you
> >can't find your old faithful. Its quite good, actually.
It is -- vary well done! There are still people interested in them...I
didn't know there were so many slipsticks around!
(btw, I bought about 10 at an auction awhile back...still have a few left,
sans cursors. Anyone want one?)
manney(a)nwohio.com
First of all, did MS Xenix run on PC hardware?
Secondly, was there ever a Windows NT 1.0 and 2.0? How did they compare
to a cheap version of UNIX?
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>The divergence from OS/2 and windows3.x was also influenced by MS getting
>Cutler an OS heavy that created DEC RSX-11 and early VMS incantations.
>the idea of NT was clean sheet 32bit OS with multitasking, multiprocessing
>and inherant networking all of which were glueons for windows. OS/2 was
>a different path from NT with a different base designer.
It is interesting that many of the error messages in the pre V3.1 beta releases
referred to OS/2. Maybe it was an almost clean room.
bw
In a message dated 2/4/98 5:38:18 PM Eastern Standard Time,
mallison(a)konnections.com writes:
<< PS/2 = MCA
PS/1 = EISA
Agreed??
-Mike >>
nope.
ps/2=some ISA and mostly MCA
ps/1=ISA
<example, certainly is. I'm not saying we don't need 15 pins; I say we ne
<15 THICKER pins, and since this connector is typically the only connecto
<on the back of a VGA adapter, there's plenty of room.
Par of the resoning was that it should have a connector that is not like
any other. if it were a standard db9 or db15 you'd have people plugging
into the serial port screaming it don't work. It's bad enough that you
have people that will force things no matter what.
Allison
>First of all, did MS Xenix run on PC hardware?
Yes.
>Secondly, was there ever a Windows NT 1.0 and 2.0? How did they compare
>to a cheap version of UNIX?
No, the first Windows NT was V3.1 which matched the current shipping version
of Windows at that time. IMHO it was not even close to any reasonable version
of Unix but was/is much easier to configure.
Regards,
Bob
<NT prior to 3.x was called MS LAN Manager, and didn't compare particularl
<well to anything.
NT prior to NT wasn't. NT was a divergent design that is non dos
filesystem. LANMAN is the networking component of WFW3.11.
The divergence from OS/2 and windows3.x was also influenced by MS getting
Cutler an OS heavy that created DEC RSX-11 and early VMS incantations.
the idea of NT was clean sheet 32bit OS with multitasking, multiprocessing
and inherant networking all of which were glueons for windows. OS/2 was
a different path from NT with a different base designer.
In reality NT is not a stand alone OS as it requires windows as the user
interface wher OS/2 it was a add on. Also the roots for OS/2 go back
further and it was the DOS replacement with all the things that DOS
still does not have.
Allison
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kip Crosby [SMTP:engine@chac.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 1998 2:16 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: Re: Microsoft OSes
>
> NT prior to 3.x was called MS LAN Manager, and didn't compare particularly
> well to anything.
>
Hmm, couple of misconceptions there. First off, LAN Manager was a network
product, not an operating system. LanMan Server ran on top of OS/2 1.x, and
LanMan clients were available for MS-DOS and OS/2. LAN Manager 1.x was an
OEM product and was not sold by Microsoft. It was available as 3Com 3+Open,
IBM LAN Server, etc. LAN Manager 1.x was a first generation product, but
LAN Manager 2.x performed well and was the first network product to capture
significant market share away from NetWare, where many others had previously
failed. LAN Manager 2.x was also the first network server sold directly by
Microsoft.
Kai
Ok, if Xenix runs on PCs, does anyone have a copy they could send me?
(Piracy won't work, I want the manuals as well)
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
First of all, did MS Xenix run on PC hardware?
Yes, 286 and above as I recall. Introduced August 1984.
Secondly, was there ever a Windows NT 1.0 and 2.0?
In a sense, this was OS/2. OS/2 1.x was a cooperative venture between
Microsoft and IBM, with the majority of the OS/2 core designed by MS
architect Gordon Letwin (ref: the 80s book _Inside OS/2_ by Letwin, MS
Press). The first version of Windows NT, 3.1, arose from a difference of
opinion between Microsoft and IBM over the future of advanced operating
systems; a difference of opinion created by the huge unanticipated success
of Windows 3.0. After the Win3.0 release, IBM and Microsoft development
paths diverged, with IBM focusing on OS/2 2.x, and Microsoft on Windows 3.x.
Both continued work on their 3.0 releases of advanced operating systems,
which became OS/2 Warp and Windows NT respectively.
Kai
My opinions not Microsoft's, etc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Max Eskin [SMTP:maxeskin@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 1998 1:02 PM
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
> Subject: Microsoft OSes
>
> First of all, did MS Xenix run on PC hardware?
> Secondly, was there ever a Windows NT 1.0 and 2.0? How did they compare
> to a cheap version of UNIX?
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<The manual/documentation I have gives a procedure you can follow (manuall
<flipping the switches all the way) which is a self-test. Following the
<procedure you can check if your 8800b is working correctly. Using this
<procedure I tracked down several problems (loose wires to fron panel) bu
<still have the address light problem.
<
<I'll track down the procedure and explain further, if there is any intere
Having done that (owner of a 8800 early, early one) I know it well.
Allison
I keep an 8" floppy disk in the front of my store to amaze people ("Just
fold it twice and stick it in your drive...it holds a lot!")
Just how much do (did?) they hold? (I'm sure there were different data
densities...just a range is all I want!)
manney
Sun Hemmi, of course.
>With all of this dialogue about slide rules, I am appalled to note that
>Pickett & Eckell is the only brand name mentioned. Am I the only person
>to have been brought up with a Keuffel & Esser ivory covered mahogany
>rule? Also, what was the name of the manufacturer who made a bamboo core
>rule?
> - don
<At 19:20 2/3/98 -0500, PG wrote:
<>"Slipsticker"?!? I thought I was the last one! C'mon -- who else here ha
<>his old slide rule _and_ still remembers how to use it?
I have my 10" white aluminum pickett handy and grab it when a quick
"good to three places" answer will do. I also use a E6B which is a
circular aircraft slide rule for time, speed, distance, fuel use and
wind correction. That one is in the plane as I'm absolutely certain
it works as the calculator version of the E6B allways seems to need a
new battery.
Allison
Hi. There's this guy, in Bahrain, who's got a PS/1 386 2MB RAM, that's been
"sitting in his closet." Now, he wants to know what it would be worth. I
want to know what it'd be worth, too. (There's going to be arguements....
I'm sure.) Anyway, condition is currently unknown, but assumed in working
condition.
Dollars, please. C'mon, I'm not THAT far away. (PS-The guy's here now...
might be handy.)
-----Original Message-----
From: John Higginbotham <higginbo(a)netpath.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Wednesday, February 04, 1998 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: PS/1 How Much?
>At 09:21 PM 2/4/98 +0300, you wrote:
>>Hi. There's this guy, in Bahrain, who's got a PS/1 386 2MB RAM, that's
been
>>"sitting in his closet." Now, he wants to know what it would be worth. I
>>want to know what it'd be worth, too. (There's going to be arguements....
>
>Shekels or dollars? :)
>
>- John Higginbotham
>- limbo.netpath.net
>