Pete:
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. What a lack of etiquette!!! I had
no idea I had posted in HTML.
The information in text follows.\:
A piece of computer memorabilia well worth mounting on the wall or giving as
a gift is a stack memory card from the UNIVAC computer. It is the LAST time
the home of a bit of information could actually be seen - a tiny doughnut on
a grid of wires.
http://www.netw.com/~drfcline/univac.htm
>>Any chance that you could post in plain English (ie ASCII) pine chokes on
HTML and there are many others on classiccmp who don't use graphical
readers.
Thanks ;-)
Pete
Foster W. Cline, M.D. wrote:
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
><HTML>
><HEAD>
><META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1
>http-equiv=Content-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3
>HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
><META content='"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=GENERATOR>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=#c0c0c0>
><DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>A piece of computer memorabilia well
>worth
>mounting on the wall or giving as a gift is a stack memory card from the
>UNIVAC
>computer. It is the LAST time the home of a bit of information could
>actually be
>seen - a tiny doughnut on a grid of wires. </FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2>See it at <A
>href="http://www.netw.com/~drfcline/univac.htm">http://www.netw.com/~drfcli
ne/univac.htm</A></FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>
And then you will be remembered for generations to come as the father of
computer collection. In 50 years or so, people will write your
biographies and refer to the Technical Manual as the Tony Book. I guess
I'd better get your autograph ahead of time...
>Well, I guess I'll write some of these technical descriptions one
>day, if only to fix in my own mind how the machines work. Some of
>them will get distributed to a few interested friends. But I doubt if
>any of them will ever be of mainstream interest.
>
>-tony
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Hi all,
I just have to tell everybody some good news, but anybody with a space
problem and of a jealous disposition may want to stop reading now...
We have just got to sale agreed on a house that has a 41' x 41' garage at
the bottom of the garden. That is about 1600 sqft or 11000 cuft of storage
space. The garage has solid floors, cavity walls, a good roof and thus dry
and clean inside.
If you ever here me talking about space problems again, then you have the
right to slap me.
--
Kevan
Old Computer Collector: http://www.heydon.org/kevan/collection/
Found on Usenet. If you can help, please contact this guy directly.
Thanks. Attachment follows.
-=-=- <snip> -=-=-
On Sun, 28 Jun 1998 23:11:32 -0500, in comp.sys.dec you wrote:
>>Message-ID: <359713F4.DA351ACA(a)intop.net>
>>Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 23:11:32 -0500
>>From: "J. S. Havard" <enigma(a)intop.net>
>>Reply-To: enigma(a)intop.net
>>Organization: intop.net
>>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
>>Subject: WANTED: VAX (any variant)
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-dialip074.intop.net
>>Lines: 18
>>Path: blushng.jps.net!news.eli.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!204.…
>>
>>If you are going to throw out a VAX, working or not, and are in
>>Mississippi, eastern Louissiana and Arkansas, or western Alabama, please
>>let me know and I will look into it.
>>
>>Also, anybody with any old CDC, Honeywell, Imprimis, or Magnetic
>>Peripheral drives, please contact me. I have a Honeywell DPS6 and the
>>strange front loading discs have a broken belt.
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>John Havard
>>--
>>----=(enigma(a)intop.net)=---------------------------------------------
>>A novice was trying to fix a broken Lisp machine by turning the power
>>off and on. Knight, seeing what the student was doing spoke sternly:
>>"You can not fix a machine by just power-cycling it with no
>>understanding of what is going wrong." Knight turned the machine off
>>and on. The machine worked.
>>------------------------=(www.intop.net/~enigma/)=-------------------
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave (Fido 1:343/272)
http://table.jps.net/~kyrrin -- also kyrrin [A-t] Jps {D=o=t} Net
Spam is bad. Spam is theft of service. Spam wastes resources. Don't spam, period.
I am a WASHINGTON STATE resident. Spam charged $500.00 per incident per Chapter 19 RCW.
On Jun 27, 19:34, Doug Yowza wrote:
> Subject: Re: OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac Classic prob (was
Macintoshes..
> On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, Pete Turnbull wrote:
>
> > On Jun 27, 16:50, Hotze wrote:
> > > Most Windows CE devices are based on HP/NEC PA-RISC (IIRC)
> > > processors, or SGI MIPS processors.
> >
> > Or Acorn/Digital StrongARM.
>
> Are you guys both smoking the same stuff? CE does not exist for PA-RISC
> or SGI MIPS, and while it does exist for Acorn/Digital/Intel ARM, it
> hasn't shipped on any real hardware platform that I know of.
>
> It has shipped on a couple of NEC MIPS derivatives and Hitachi SH.
MIPS chips are MIPS chips. SGI own MIPS, but don't manufacture the
devices. NEC, Philips, Toshiba, amongst others, do, but they didn't design
them. The VR4xxx series that NEC use are derivatives of the standard R4000
and R5000 series.
You're possibly right about ARM and CE, though. Several companies have
licenced the technology, but most of the ARM-based devices (eg the Psion 5,
Newton) use Psion's OS or JavaOS, not CE.
> There
> is also support for ARM, PPC, and x86, but I haven't heard of any
hardware
> shipping for those platforms.
> ObCC-Q: What was the first microprocessor-based box to run Unix?
>
> ObCC-A: The Z8000-based Onyx C8002 in 1980.
What about the 11/23 systems Bell Labs were using in 1978?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
A couple of weeks ago someone thrust this bag into my hands and
suggested that I find out about it. In the finest tradition of
getting the 'net to do my homework for me, I did a few web searches
that gave me a lot of false leads and no real info, and now I'm
pestering y'all.
So what's in the bag? It's a Z80 singleboard, 4 15/16" x 6 3/4"
(12.6cm x 17.1 cm for you metric-threaded folks). Legends in the
component-side traces include an "EXO corporation" logo, "(C) 1982"
(where (C) is the C-in-circle copyright symbol), and "1010A" which I
guess is a part or model number. There's a terminal strip off to one
side which I am guessing (from the ICs and a little bit of
follow-the-traces that is about the limit of my know-how) is intended
to be connections for power, interrupt lines, and a serial port. And
there are three 34-pin (2x17) plugs in about the middle of the board.
Significant ICs would seem to be an SGS Z80A, a National 2716 EPROM,
nine Hitachi HM4864P-2, Zilog Z8410A (DMA) and Z8440A (SIO/O),
National MC1489P and two TI SN101057 on the way to that terminal
strip, and a couple of what I guess are some sort of programmable
logic in 20-pin DIPs whose markings have been removed so that "(C)
1981... EXO SYS. CORP." can be stamped on top.
Anybody know what this is, or anything about the company, or any
better places to look? I'm guessing "singleboard for control system"
but that is pretty much outside my know-how.
And how did I get into this fix? I suspect it's karmic payback for
something I said a couple hours before at the Foothill swap meet.
Someone showed me a 68000 singleboard (not too different) and I said
something like "once upon a time I'd have found that a really neat
hacker toy, now I don't think I have time for it." There's clues in
here somewhere, but I don't think I've figured out which ones I'm
supposed to pay attention to.
-Frank McConnell
Well, this month's TRW Swapmeet haul was pretty expens^H^H^H^H
good: I found some old computer books, and some electronic music
and acoustics texts from the 60s... and a neat HP 1/4" data
recorder, four channels, FM, four speeds... nice for my restoration
work. And an Edison cylinder recording for $10... (cool!)
BUT.... (here's the on-topic part) I found a Tomy 16-Bit Graphics
Tutor, along with another Commodore 64 and printer. [Anyone in SoCal
want two C-64s, a disk drive and printer? Not really my 'thing'..
free to good home, you pay FedEx shipping...] Anyway..
This unit is slightly larger than the C-64, has a cartridge port
on the top, an expansion bus port on the back, as well as a DIN for
the cassette and a DB9 marked 'controller', and audio/video/RF RCA
jacks. I have yet to plug it in. It is stock # 800, model # TP 1000.
Is this thing anything? Is it priceless/worthless?
Interesting/boring? I have never run across one in all my years
collecting...
ALSO: I'm still looking for the vacuum column door for a Kennedy
9300 9trk drive.... if another drive was available within
reasonable going-and-getting distance I'd go for that, too.
ALSO ALSO: The formatter card for the above, to fit a PDP 11/34a.
Cheers
John
You could have said single chip CPU but in reality what does that mean
as 8088 required a 8084a clock driver and many other chips in practical
use are never quite single chips unless you mean an 8048 or 8051!
<I didn't mention the 11/03 because although it's often described as a
<microprocessor, it's actually a set of 4 40-pin chips (5 with optional
<EIS/FIS instructions) called a D-11. That's the one often called an
The KD11 was four chips (5 with EIS/FIS) but the distribution was CPU core
and Micoms (microcode roms) around it.
<sure there was a stand-alone system using RX02s. Of course, you could al
<count 11/23 systems running standard 7th Edition Unix (1979) on RL02s, li
<the one I have here.
And here too!
Allison
<I class that as a micro, but I don't know if others would.
11/23 was called a micro by it's vendor DEC! What could be more official
than that. Also the LSI-11 (KD-11).
Allison
At 04:06 AM 6/28/98 -0500, Doug wrote:
>I picked up an ET-3400 6800 CPU trainer today. It was obviously abused by
>several students in a past life. I've resoldered its broken connections,
>and it seems to work OK, but I can't fully test it yet because I'm missing
>the seven-segment LEDs and the monitor ROM.
>
>I happended to have the manual for a 1977 version of this trainer, but my
>trainer appears to be from 1987 or so and has a few differences (for one,
>it uses a 6802 rather than a 6800). Luckily, the manual has a listing of
>the monitor ROM. But I don't have a 6800 assembler.
>
>So, does anybody have any of the following:
>
>1) A monitor ROM image (preferably for a 1987 model)
>2) A 6800 assembler (preferably Linux-hosted, but DOS will work)
>3) The EPROM part number for this board (the man. mentions MCM6830A, but
>that doesn't ring a bell with me)
>4) Part numbers for the 7-segment LEDs (I only have Heathkit part nos.)
>5) A spare "1" key for my keypad :-)
>
I kooked on the net, but didn't find any info on the ET-3400. I did find
this page on the EC-1, however:
http://www.cyberventure.com/heathkit/computers/ec-1.html
At least the LED's should be able to be replaced if uou know their sizes and
whether C Anode or C Cathode. Looking in catalogs like Jameco, the part
numbers don't help my memory, but the size/descriptions do.
Have wished to see a Heath cross reference for things like IC's, transistors.,
collected from a large number of their manuals. I have at least 1 2716 with
a Heath number on it- have no idea what it's for.
-Dave
Remember: I'm the same copyright as the C-64
>Thanks for posting a more complete response than mine. I didn't think
>that perhaps Max is too young to remember using a cassette recorder and
>cassette tapes for program storage. I just assumed that everyone on
this
>list would know that computers used to use tape recorders in olden days
>before disk drives came along.
>
>Sam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Ever onward.
>
> September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2
> See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
> [Last web page update: 06/11/98]
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>I have to plead DEC-hardware ignorance. Did the 11/23 use a single-chip
>micro (the LSI-11, according to Allison)? If so, then please add
>"non-DEC" to my Q :-)
The 11/23, 11/23+ and 11/24 all used the same chip set. The actual
processor existed as two chips mounted on one carrier. This was
the DCF-11 (the 'Fonz') chip. The memory management unit was a
second chip and the floating point unit was a third chip (again,
actually two chips on one carrier). In addition, there was a
CIS (commerical instruction set) chip which was 6 chips on a single
carrier (I have a couple of 11/23+ boards with CIS).
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry(a)zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg(a)world.std.com |
| Digital Equipment Corporation | |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
On Jun 28, 13:29, Doug Yowza wrote:
> Didn't SGI recently re-spinoff MIPS as an independent concern? In any
> case, while the core ISA should be the same, NEC developed the VR4101 and
> VR4102 specifically for CE, and I doubt that you'll find the chips in any
> SGI box. I got invalid links when I tried to look at the specs at NEC's
> site, but I think the CE-specifics were probably in areas of power
> management and on-chip peripherals.
Yes, lots of companies like MIPS, Digital, ARM, Motorola, etc etc make the
core designs available for others to incorporate in their customised
processors, and I had no doubt that that's just what NEC did. Sometimes
the design owner does the customisation, sometimes the company who want the
custom version. NEC would have the experise to do it themselves, I'm sure.
All I meant was that it would still basically be a MIPS core, with a
standard architecture and instruction set.
I hadn't heard about MIPS being separated again. Given what SGI are doing
at the moment, I wouldn't be surprised.
> It's public knowledge that Microsoft added ARM support for WinCE 2.1, but
> that version of the OS is not shipping for any platform. In fact, 2.1
was
> still beta last I checked (a couple of weeks ago).
I confess that I pay little attention to WinCE and even less to version
numbers :-)
> I have to plead DEC-hardware ignorance. Did the 11/23 use a single-chip
> micro (the LSI-11, according to Allison)? If so, then please add
> "non-DEC" to my Q :-)
Yes, the 11/23 used the F-11 chip, which is a single 40-pin package. There
are optional add-ons, but the basic processer is just one ceramic object --
though anyone who looks at it will immediately see that it's actually two
smaller packages (essentially, one for ALU and one for microcode) mounted
on a common carrier with a few chip capacitors for good measure.
I didn't mention the 11/03 because although it's often described as a
microprocessor, it's actually a set of 4 40-pin chips (5 with optional
EIS/FIS instructions) called a D-11. That's the one often called an
LSI-11, although strictly speaking LSI-11 refers to a particular processor
board. And I deliberately didn't give more detail about the unix systems,
because I can't remember what Bell called those little systems, and I don't
have the reprints of the AT&T Technical Journal to hand :-) I'm fairly
sure there was a stand-alone system using RX02s. Of course, you could also
count 11/23 systems running standard 7th Edition Unix (1979) on RL02s, like
the one I have here.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Dept. of Computer Science
University of York
Makes for some interesting reading, anyway.... talks of Microsoft,
Apple, Atari, IBM, Xerox, HP, and others as the story traces a
time-line of Microsoft Windows.
Here's a cut and paste to get you to the story:
Microsoft's latest OS offering didn't invent itself, and neither did
the
first Windows apps. It was a long, sometimes painful evolutionary
period
spanning at least the last 30 years. Would it surprise you to know
that
Atari was a contender for the OS crown? Find out how, and more, in
our
feature story "30 years of Windows: a retrospective." It's an
enlightening look at the history of the Windows OS, and the history
of
computing itself.
http://www.cnet.com/Content/Features/Special/30Years/index.html?dd.sd
--
____________________________________________________________
| Cord G. Coslor : archive(a)navix.net |\
| Deanna S. Wynn : deannasue(a)navix.net | |
| on AOL Instant Messenger: DeannaCord | |
| http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/4395 | |
|------------------------------------------------------------| |
| PO Box 308 - Peru, NE - 68421 - (402) 872- 3272 | |
|------------------------------------------------------------| |
| If you don't have AOL (like us) but want a great instant | |
| chat feature, just go to http://www.aol.com/aim | |
|____________________________________________________________| |
\_____________________________________________________________\|
This is a coincidence! I just got an SE/30 and a Mac IIx too. I also have
some of those Asante SCSI Network adapters. I'm wanting to network one of
these with my PC, but I don't know where to start. I know linux supports
Appletalk right out of the box so to speak, but I dual boot between in and
Windows 98, and 98 is my primary OS for the most part. Now, I've never
heard mention of Appletalk as a protocol under 95 or 98. Is it available?
What other option do I have besides Appletalk?
BTW, my only networking experience is with Novell Netware server and
DOS/Win95/NT boxes.
At 05:08 PM 6/27/98 PDT, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>I bought an SE30 w/ Ethernet recently for $80 through the net. The
>owner showed up at my office one day recently and delivered it. The
>next week I also bought a Mac IIx w/ 8 megs of RAM for $25 at a
>Silicon Valley swap meet. A friend gave me a couple of Asante SCSI
><-> Ethernet adapters which can normally be had for around $20 on
>eBay.
-
- john higginbotham ____________________________
- webmaster www.pntprinting.com -
- limbo limbo.netpath.net -
The Commodore systems have been spoken for, thanks for all of the
replies from the list. I will also reply to each of you who wrote me
personally.. but a public thanks is in order as well.
Cheers
John
>i've never had a problem cracking macs
Just make sure you don't mix a Platinum front panel from a Mac Plus with
one of the older beige backs. I inadvertantly did this a few months ago
and they're still together.
Tom Owad
--
Sysop of Caesarville Online
Client software at: <http://home.earthlink.net/~tomowad/>
I have the same inventory tracking problems, too. I don't have a
complete invetory of anything but my 11/34a stuff. In the accounting
profession, what we need is an "inventory locator system."
I have the beginnings of this in an Excel spreadsheet. The spreadsheet
indicates the DEC "M" number, description, and the location: the main
chassis, expansion chassis, or in "stores."
I, too, want to go the barcode inventory route. Thinking out loud, if
someone could get their hands on a shareware point-of-sale inventory package
for a PC, that might do the trick. I see ads in PC Magazine all the time for
POS systems and software, but I don't want to spend several hundred $$$$ for
it.
Rich Cini/WUGNET <nospam_rcini(a)msn.com>
- ClubWin! Charter Member
- MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
- Preserver of "classic" computers
<<<< ========== reply separator ========== >>>>>
At 11:31 PM 6/27/98 +0100, Tony Duell wrote:
>the battery cover and 2 in the handle. You need a long Torx driver for
>the latter 2.
For what it's worth: I have been using screwdrivers with the interchangable
bits for some time now. When I first came into contact with a Mac SE, I
went to sears and bought an extension for my present screwdriver. I keep
that torx bit in the extension so it's right there whenever I need it,
which has been quite alot lately, since I am rebuilding about 17 SE, SE/30,
and Classic machines.
Also, seems that every compact mac I have messed with has already had the
case popped (according to the marks). What do I do if I come across a
virgin that's never been popped so to speak? Is it harder to get the case off?
-
- john higginbotham ____________________________
- webmaster www.pntprinting.com -
- limbo limbo.netpath.net -
Dave, I hope you don't mind me copying this reply to ClassicCmp as I think
it may interest others as well.
On Sat, 27 Jun 1998, dave dameron wrote:
> Well I should see if I can visit up to the bay area at the VCF II time
> and meet some people.
That you should do! :)
> Will there be registration later on the web site, or do you just show up
> at the door? Are there a lot of individuals showing a few things (vs.
> groups that appear to be the "private museums")? Thanks -Dave
The web page has registration information now (see URL below), so if you
go there you can get all the details. But basically, if you register now
you pay $15 for full admission to both days and save $5. Otherwise its
$10/day.
The exhibition will consist of numerous private individuals and various
user groups exhibiting their collections. There will be no overlapping,
and everyone who is exhibiting is being selected for their particular
genre. There will be Doug Salot and Roger Sinasohn doing a portables
exhibit, Paul Zurikowski from the local Mac user group doing a complete
Mac exhibit, Jordan Ruderman will be doing a Sol-20 exhibit, Larry
Anderson will be doing a Commodore exhibit, I'm working with a guy who
wants to do a PDP-8 exhibit, etc. I'm still looking for more exhibitors
so if anyone is interested contact me.
There will also be various museums making a presence, although they won't
all be exhibiting. I'm currently working with The Computer Museum History
Center to bring some of their artifacts to exhibit (I'm also working on
scheduling tours to the History Center from VCF so out-of-town guests get
a chance to see their amazing collection); David Hale, who is in the
process of assembling a museum in Pennsylvania that will follow the
progress of computers in different fields of technology will be driving
out and bringing some computers with him to exhibit and some to sell (he
was going to come to VCF 1.0 but got stuck in a big snow storm in Chicago;
he also got a very rare kit computer from the 60s that he was
bringing to VCF stolen while he was snowbound in the airport...long
story); and finally I've invited David Weil, the curator of the
Computer Museum of America in San Diego, to come up and setup a booth.
So there will be at least a couple museums having a presence at VCF. I
hope to get more, and I hope the VCF eventually becomes an event where
computer museums from around the world gather once a year to share
information and strategies.
If you have anymore questions please ask!
Sam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever onward.
September 26 & 27...Vintage Computer Festival 2
See http://www.siconic.com/vcf for details!
[Last web page update: 06/11/98]
OK... I've made some progress. The fault light problem with my RA82 drive
was cured by reseating all the connectors and pushing in the socketed chips
(they crackled most satisfactorily).
So now the RA82 passes all its tests, but I can't get the KDA-50 to see
it. I've tried a couple of different boards. System is a MicroVAX II, 8
megs (well, 9 counting the CPU resident) memory, RQDX3 in one cabinet and
the KDA50 board set in the other. RQDX3 has an RD52 and an RX50 on it, all
of which are seen no problem by the diagnostics. The RQDX is at 772150 and
the KDA-50 is at the next available MSCP floating address.
Question: I've currently got both A and B port cables from the hard drive
connected to ports 0 and 1 of the KDA-50 controller. Is this correct, or am
I confusing the thing by feeding it back on itself?
I'm glad this one's going better than my 11/44 did earlier today...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce Lane, Sysop, The Dragon's Cave BBS (Fidonet 1:343/272)
(Hamateur: WD6EOS) (E-mail: kyrrin(a)jps.net)
"Our science can only describe an object, event, or living thing in our own
human terms. It cannot, in any way, define any of them..."
>This in combination with looking for a cassette port should be a good
>way to tell.
I know we've been through this, but could someone summarize for me about
the cassette port? What can be used with it?
>
>==================================
>Rich Cini/WUGNET
> - Charter ClubWin! Member (6)
> - MCP Windows 95/Windows Networking
> - Collector of classic computers
><<========== Reply Separator ==========>>
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
At 11:15 PM 6/27/98 EDT, SUPRDAVE(a)aol.com wrote:
>loosened screws to the front half of the mac. that usually pops it loose. you
>can apply the same technique to the bottom screws also. i've done this to all
>compact macs except for the classic and cc models since i dont own one.
hope i
>explained it clearly.
Thanks. I had heard of a "specialized" tool that Apple sold that would
accomplish the task. Figured it was just a way for them to make more money. :)
-
- john higginbotham ____________________________
- webmaster www.pntprinting.com -
- limbo limbo.netpath.net -
Well, I know that the HP's run off of PA-RISCs, and that Phillips Velos are
SGI's. Also, theo ther processor support isn't in H/PC's, and it probably
won't be. x86's used in the Elan SC400 based devices, I know that they're
some mapping hanheld that uses that. PPC, and so forth will probably show
up in the Jupiter-class 2Lb devices.
Ciao,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Yowza <yowza(a)yowza.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Sunday, June 28, 1998 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: OS's In ROM's (was: Re: Mac Classic prob (was Macintoshes..
>On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, Pete Turnbull wrote:
>
>> On Jun 27, 16:50, Hotze wrote:
>> > Most Windows CE devices are based on HP/NEC PA-RISC (IIRC)
>> > processors, or SGI MIPS processors.
>>
>> Or Acorn/Digital StrongARM.
>
>Are you guys both smoking the same stuff? CE does not exist for PA-RISC
>or SGI MIPS, and while it does exist for Acorn/Digital/Intel ARM, it
>hasn't shipped on any real hardware platform that I know of.
>
>It has shipped on a couple of NEC MIPS derivatives and Hitachi SH. There
>is also support for ARM, PPC, and x86, but I haven't heard of any hardware
>shipping for those platforms.
>
>ObCC-Q: What was the first microprocessor-based box to run Unix?
>
>ObCC-A: The Z8000-based Onyx C8002 in 1980.
>
>-- Doug
>
>