>> http://www.bccc.com/nancy/memorydress.html
>
>Core memory in oscilliscopes? Where did she get that idea?
She also talks about medical equipment, which causes me to believe
that most of the core memory she gets comes out of pulse height analyzers
>from the late 60's to the mid 70's. These look a lot like oscilliscopes
to the untrained idea (they have a CRT, lots of knobs, BNC jacks, etc.)
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Hmmm, this is really odd, I found some more boards that I don't seem to
have inventoried today. Anyone have any ideas on these?
Versatec
PDP-11 Matrix control
This is a dual height board, but I'm pretty sure it's for a UNIBUS system,
thanks to the wierd connector sticking out the side of it for another board.
DILOG DQ342
Quad Height, has a 34 and a 10-pin connector
SCD-RQD11/EC
Quad Height, 4 20-pin connectors, 1 34-pin, and 1 10-pin. 3 LED's 2 green,
1 red. I think it's a Sigma ESDI controller, based on doing a DejaNews
search, it also looks like it _might_ be basically a rebadged WQESD
controller, since the one article talks about WOMBAT. Is this correct, and
can I just use my WQESD manual for it?
Plessey
P/N 705920-100A
Quad Height, RAM board
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
>Or what would your definition of Micocomputer be? I suppose we have to
>establish that first. graphic monitor and floppy drive, with hard drive
>optional, would seem a good start.
By those standards, even an IBM 5150 (aka "IBM PC") wasn't even a
microcomputer. I think that sort of definition is way too narrow. Then a
gain, I despise most any kind of exclusionary definition. But that doesn't
leave one with much in the way of definitions left, does it? :-).
I *do* like the web page that Sam pointed out
( http://www.blinkenlights.com/pc.shtml ). I may not agree with the
final positive, but I do agree with all the previous negatives :-).
And that Arkay CT-560 looks pretty nifty!
Tim.
I have several jars of ferrite cores made by IBM sometime in the late
1950's. I don't know exactly what size they are, but they can be
hand-wired without a stereo microscope.
I know, because I built a plane of 1x64x64 when I was in high school in
1971. (I was very determined to build my own computer.) The project was
abandoned when I went away for college, which was probably a good thing,
because my analog design skills were not up to creating the drive and sense
circuitry.
As I recall, I used something like #60 enameled wire. One of the
challenges was stripping the insulation off the ends of the wires without
damaging the copper.
If anyone is seriously intending to build a demo core memory system, I'd be
glad to provide a couple of hundred cores. I'd recommend something like a
16x16 array, unless you're looking for a project to make a 20-to-life
sentence go faster.
----
John Dykstra jdykstra(a)nortelnetworks.com
Principal Software Architect voice: ESN 454-1604
Enterprise Solutions fax: ESN 667-8549
Thank you man. Lots of work followed by lots of benefit.
Yours in good faith.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
Kevin Stumpf * Unusual systems * www.unusual.on.ca
+1.519.744.2900 * EST/EDT GMT - 5
Collector - Commercial Mainframes & Minicomputers from
the 50s, 60s, & 70s and control panels and consoles.
Author & Publisher - A Guide to Collecting Computers &
Computer Collectibles * ISBN 0-9684244-0-6
.
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, PG Manney wrote:
> I recently acquired a PCjr with a bunch of software. Machine's very clean.
>
> I'm not really that interested in playing with this beast. Should I sit on
> it as an investment? Is it worth anything now? Dnyone interested?
It is a relative situation. Value is what is it worth to you or the buyer. A
few points about the computer. There are not that many floating around for
sale. It was a flop for IBM but it also was IBM's entr?e into the "Home
computer" market. This gives it some weight. The PC and its siblings had
supplanted the PC jr and nailed the lid on the coffin, but I would hang on
to it, it will not become valuable for a while but it is a "place marker" in
the history of computers. What did its introduction mean to the industry?
Altair- first viable personal computer, Apple I computer, first of the
longest lived manufacturer. (Yes IBM has been around longer but not as a PC
maker) 1st Sony PC, the design and implementation of the 3.5" diskette,
Tandy the first mass market machine not only sold in computer stores,
Commodore Pet, First computer to make the cover of a national general
circulation magazine (Popular Science) and from a calculator company no
less; using calculator keys for the keyboard. The Commodore also set a
standard for selling computers to computer dealers in their original selling
agreements. Vector Graphics, first computer company founded and run by a
woman. Osborne, the computer made by the guru of computer hobbyists and
Kaypro, first generally accepted computer for the average business person.
Want to know the value of a computer? Is it a piece of hardware or a point
of computer history, did it change the way things were done? Good luck.
I wrote
> BTW Siemens make some torroidal cores down to 1mm thick ferrite, slightly
larger
> in other materials. RS Components stock some - http://rswww.com/ and go in
> through the catalogue: "Electronics", "Transformers/Inductors/Ferrites",
> "Ferrites", "Torroids" (sic). There are even data sheets but I didn't manage
to
> download them.
So it seems that RS and I made the same spelling mistake. I think "Toroid" and
"Toroidal" are the correct spellings...
P.
NOTE: my problems are at the end of this message, got carried away to the
extent someone might find this to have some useful info :^)
I'm trying to run some tests on my /44 and have been having loads of fun
with my lack of doc's on XXDP+. Note, for people in the same boat, I'd
recommend Pete Turnbull's notes
http://www.dunnington.u-net.com/public/XXDP.ps Though the best help I've
found is having the doc's on the hardware I've tried to test.
The /44 Tech Manual says to run 1-11 of the following tests in order (NOTE:
I added the XXDP+ column).
MAINDEC Operating Title XXDP+ 2.5
Diagnostic Sequence
--------------- ------- ------------------------------- -----------
CKK FA <xy> 1 11/44 Diagnostic ROM*
CKK AA <xy> 2 11/44 CPU/EIS KKAAB0.BIC
CKK AB <xy> 3 11/44 Traps KKABD1.BIC
CKK TA <xy> 4 11/44 Mem. Mgt. Prt A KKTAB1.BIC
CKK TB <xy> 5 11/44 Mem. Mgt. Prt B KKTBD0.BIN
CZM 9B <xy> 6 M9312/11/44 UBI Boot ZM9BE0.BIN
CKK UA <xy> 7 11/44 UBI Map KKUAE0.BIN
CKK KA <xy> 8 11/44 KK11-B Cache KKKAC0.BIC
CZM SD <xy> 9 MSL-M/L Memory ZMSDD0.BIN
MS11-L/M/P Memory Diagnostic ZMSPC0.BIC
CZD LD <xy> 10 DL11-w/MFM SLU ZDLDI0.BIN
CKK AC <xy> 11 11/44 Power Fail KKACC0.BIC
CKF PA <xy> 12 FP11-F Part A KFPAD0.BIC
CKF PB <xy> 13 FP11-F Part B KFPBC0.BIC
CKF PC <xy> 14 FP11-F Part C KFPCD0.BIC
CZK EE <xy> 15 PDP-11 CIS Instr. Exerciser ZKEEC0.BIC
CZK UA <xy> 16 UNIBUS Systems Exerciser Diag. ZKUAE0.BIN
CZK UB <xy> 17 UNIBUS Exerciser Module ZKUBC0.BIN
*Included with the M7098 UBI module.
CKFPA
||\/|
|| |Indicates a series of diagnostics: A= part 1, B=part 2, C=part 3, etc.
|| | (this is what the PDP-11/44 Tech Manual claims, I'm not convinced
|| | that it was followed)
|| Indicates a specific device tested by the diagnostic:
|| "FP" = Floating Point Diagnostic
|| "RK" = RK05 (disk diagnostic)
|"K" indicates a specific diagnostic for the PDP-11/44 system.
"C" indicates a PDP-11 diagnositic (not used on diagnostic disk pack or
magnetic tape).
<xy> = x = Revision Character (alpha)
y = Patch Number (0-9)
My single biggest problem seems to be stopping a diagnostic once I've
started it. So far I've been resorting to stopping the CPU and rebooting,
but one would think that there must be a better way, and that I've missed
it.
My second problem is the first test, I can't find a KKFA*.* test. Is there
another test I can run on the diagnostic ROM?
#3 is #3, but I think this is proper behavior
CKKABD0 11/44 TRAPS
NO FLOATING POINT OPTION PRESENT
NO CIS OPTION PRESENT
CONSOLE
17777707 023252
>>>
Problem #4 isn't that big a deal, the "M9312/11/44 UBI Boot" diagnostic
complains that the DD and DL ROMS are in as DL and DD, while it wants DD
and DL.
#5 may or may not be a problem with the cache (real problem is my not
knowing how to interpret it).
CKKKAC0 11-44 KK11B CACHE
RMI REGISTER (G5179) NOT USED-SKIP HI ORDER BIT ADDRESS TEST
UNIBUS EXERCISER NOT USED-DMA TESTS NOT PERFORMED
END OF PASS # 1
END OF PASS # 2
END OF PASS # 3
<etc,etc,etc>
I solved #6 by finding and substituting the ZMSPC0 memory test for ZMSDD0.
Opps, guess I didn't try step 11, and 12-14 can't be done at the moment as
the FP11 isn't installed, and I don't have a CIS for #15, 16&17 both
complained.
Zane
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Adminstrator |
| healyzh(a)aracnet.com (primary) | Linux Enthusiast |
| healyzh(a)holonet.net (alternate) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.dragonfire.net/~healyzh/ |
Greetings All,
Can you help identify these UNIBUS boards? They were found in a
BA11-K expansion box in a VAX 11/750. The VAX was used to run the
equipment in an MRI trailer. I didn't remove the system and don't
know to what type of equipment it was originally connected.
1) Full size genuine DEC hex board, no "M" number on spine.
"DIGITAL" and "BSWU-T" etched on front. Two stickers, marked
"835084" and "4522 117 2760". 93 TTL chips, 18 PAL chips, 5
DIP switch blocks, two 50-pin connectors for ribbon cables. On
rear side, "4522 111 91963" etched and a sticker with "PR32.4B"
and "MB6024ET".
2) Plessey Peripheral Systems quad board. Marked with "P/N 703680-
100E" on front, "703679-001 REVB" on rear. 7 chips with stickers
"218 101C, 102C, 103C, 104C, 105C, 100 UK30, UK2A". 62 TTL chips.
1 50-pin connector with cable to what appears to be an interface
board (#3 below).
3) 8" by 10" board connected to Plessey board above. 2 50-pin connec-
tors on top. Etched with "C-FTR", "FDD-FTR", "FTR-FTR". 12 26LS31
& 32 chips, 10 TTL. Instead of card-edge fingers, has 2 3-level
male 3x32 pin AMP3485 connectors which plug into corresponding
female receptacles in BA11-K box (one group of hex slots replaced
with these).
Any help identifying these boards is appreciated. Doubt I'll ever use
them, but nice to know what they might be!
BTW - Posted this inquiry to comp.sys.dec & alt.sys.pdp11 awhile back
so it may look familiar.
Thanks,
Jason Brady jrbrady(a)mindspring.com Lynnwood, WA
Well.. amplifying what Sellam has written... the very first
SoCal CompuCrawl is in the history books.
It takes up about two sentences. ;}
The Gathering was small but intense... we had big fun, tho. I
gave away some lonely equipment to a Good Home, and we played with
some of my Geek Toys. I got a cool t-shirt with 'GEEK' emblazoned
boldly for all to see and snicker at. Marvin behaved himself for the
most part, and law enforcement assistance was thankfully not
required at any time during the entire soiree.
Since there were several of Us who apparently had to cancel at the
last minute, I am strongly considering having another next month,
instead of next quarter (september) as I had originally planned.
Also, various folks mentioned to me that logistics and/or
transportation issues affected their participation. Anyone needing
a ride to-from should contact me directly and we'll sort it out.
So again: if there is any interest between now and the next SoCal
TRW swap meet, on the last Saturday of May (the 29th? 30th?) from
local and visiting Listmembers, I will again hold a Vintage Computer
open house after the TRW swapmeet and post-swap Brunch, and
thereafter, quarterly.
Mark Your Calendars! (Use spray paint this time)
Cheers
John
I recently acquired a PCjr with a bunch of software. Machine's very clean.
I'm not really that interested in playing with this beast. Should I sit on
it as an investment? Is it worth anything now? Dnyone interested?
Thanks
P Manney
Is it illegal to yell "Movie!" in a fire station?
Thousands of discounted photo items at http://www.hmcltd.net/pgphoto
Every two years at this time the University of Queensland Alumni Association
holds a large sale of old books donated by individuals plus library
discards. I've found some good collectables there in the past, such as old
manuals, but this time (today) it took me five minutes to just find where
the computer books were - instead of a full trestle table top as in previous
years, there was just 4 inches of space reserved for them - maybe 20 books
in a hall of many many thousands.
I found the lady in charge and asked what had happened to them? She said "we
kept any computer books dated in the 50's or 60's (I didn't find any), and
anything fairly recent, but all donations from the 70's and 80's went out."
I asked "Did you send them to one of the charities to sell at their
bookfests?". Her response "oh no, they just go straight to the shredder! -
we can't get rid of them otherwise."
And sadly, I suspect she was correct. Besides the odd character like me
looking for manuals for long gone models, most of the stuff that went out
for sale was rubbish to 99.99+% of people and stayed on the table at the end
of the day. But I sure wish she had at least given me the chance to look
through that stuff before it hit the shredder.
The good news was that I found amongst the "sets" (encyclopedias etc) a full
set (I think, 22 volumes anyway) of the Time-Life series Understanding
Computers. Lots of good computer history and pictures - but I would be
interested if anyone has any criticism of the facts presented in any of the
articles in that series - they seem authoritative enough, but then some of
the people on this list know more than the usual sources that Time-Life
writers would have used.
Phil
in Brisbane, Australia.
Yesterday, at the KS10 move, I came away with two IBM PCs, but I
don't know enough about them to know if they are the AT or XT
models... they both have a 5.25" floppy and a hard drive, and
both have color monitors.
They are both desktop boxes... the monitors were sitting on top
of them.
So, how do I tell...
Megan Gentry
Former RT-11 Developer
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Megan Gentry, EMT/B, PP-ASEL | Internet (work): gentry!zk3.dec.com |
| Unix Support Engineering Group | (home): mbg!world.std.com |
| Compaq Computer Corporation | addresses need '@' in place of '!' |
| 110 Spitbrook Rd. ZK03-2/T43 | URL: http://world.std.com/~mbg/ |
| Nashua, NH 03062 | "pdp-11 programmer - some assembler |
| (603) 884 1055 | required." - mbg |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
Hum.... Thanks for the tip on the seller! My M series is sick, so I was just
getting ready to fire off an email asking what cards were in the memory
backplane.... with a record like that, I don't think I'll bother (now if it
was a 7900A drive, I'd forge ahead anyways <grin>)!
Jay West
>> Hey, Sallam, couldn't this power thing be a good addition for
>> VCF 3.0? A speach about how to operate Eq. from a different
>> country (and power system) in an acceptable and safe fashion ?
>> Maybe if Philip and me (possible with a thirs, US guy) team up
>> to give an outline of the different circumstances to remember
>> when using foreign (old) computers ? There might be some need.
>
> Yes, I think this would make for a great workshop. I expect more people
> to start trading computers across the world and this will make for a very
> relevant discussion.
I think it's an excellent idea. In fact I have long thought a computer-buff's
guide to power electrics (the mains) would be worth writing.
But I doubt I'll manage VCF 3 this year. A holiday in CA is not something I do
every year, alas...
Philip.
>2. Phase.
>
>As I understand it the usual practice in the US is take _either_ a phase
and
>earth (neutral) _or_ two phases of the HV supply and feed a single phase
>transformer from this. The LV side of the transformer is (say) 240V with a
>centre tap. The centre tap is earthed and provides the neutral connection,
the
>outer two taps are then both hot at 120V, 180 degrees apart. This is true
_even
>if_ the primary (HV winding) is connected between two phases of the HV
3-phase
>system.
Close but not quite right. For single phase installations the power company
supplies 2 hots and neutral. This is a center tapped secondary and the
neutral is earthed at the service entrance. The primary of this transformer
is fed from only 1 high voltage phase.
>In the UK the usual practice is to connect all 3 phases of the HV (almost
>invariably 11kV phase to phase) to a delta-star 3-phase transformer. The
>secondary, the star-connected winding provides 3 phases and neutral.
Neutral is
>earthed at the transformer. Protective earth can be provided by _either_ a
>separate wire from the main earth at the transformer _or_ an earthing
electrode
>at each customer's site _or_ the neutral is earthed at a large number of
points
>on the system and the customer's protective earth is bonded to neutral at
the
>point of entry of the supply. In all cases the customer sees 240V line to
>neutral; if he gets more than one line (hot) connection, they will be 120
>degrees apart.
The delta-star is the same but with 120 phase to neutral and 208 phase to
phase. In the UK it is the same but 240 phase to neutral and 416 phase to
phase.
You can also commonly find 480 3 phase delta- star 277 phase to neutral.
This is then used for lighting (277 florescent is common) and large loads
like air conditioning. In these installations the customer has to provide
their own transformer to 208/120.
>In remote locations, only 2 phases of the 11kV system are taken to the
site.
>Small loads get a single phase 11kV/250V transformer with one end of the LV
>earthed; larger loads get a single phase 11kV/500V transformer with a
centre tap
>earthed. Some farm equipment (I am told - I have never seen this) is rated
for
>480V single phase.
I don't think this is avail. in the US.
>
>It is very unusual for a domestic installation to get more than one phase
and
>neutral. But 3-phase can be done - the supply company don't mind putting
it in
>if they think you'll buy a lot of electricity!
They will here also and I checked into getting it here but I am a few miles
>from the closest point that 3 phase is available for distribution. I would
either have to guarentee a large $ per month usage or pay them to add the
additional lines. Over $10,000 was mentioned.
Dan
Hi all,
I read a web page somewhere that indicated DEC put in the public domain
all the documentation they no longer publish.
Is this true? Can anyone point me back to the original web page?
Thanks,
clint
<Ok after spending much of the weekend trying to get my core driver working
<and feeling really good about having all the parts I needed in my spares
<box, I realized I had built half of an h-bridge. Since I had already
<designed a really nice MOSFET based h-bridge that could switch 10 - 15 amp
<for my robots I slapped my head and went "Doh!"
;) that will do.
<Anyway, so I wired up my #2 nut with sense wire to the h-bridge and start
<slapping current back and forth through my nuts. :-) Seriously though when
<viewed on 'scope it looks something like:
<
< +--+
< | |
<Ch1 -+ +----+ +-----
< | |
< +--+
< +--+
<Ch2 -+ +----+ +-----
< +--+
Transformer action prior to saturation.
<UNTIL you get to about 7.5 amps or so, and then it looks like:
No you know what nuts dont work...
< +--+
< | |
<Ch1 -+ +----+ +-----
< | |
< +--+
< +--+
<Ch2 ---+ +----+ +-----
< +--+
<
<So I stared at it a bit and the little bulb went on between my ears.
<
<The first pulse "writes" a zero to the core, if the core is either already
<magnetized with a zero, or has nothing in it, then the sense line sees the
<deta-B (change in magnetic field) and a current is induced in the wire.
<When the second pulse comes along it "writes" a one into the core, same
<effect on the sense wire. The clever part comes when your "write" a zero t
<a core that has a one already written to it.
Core is one of the few DESTRCUTIVE READ memories. You have to try and flip
it to see if it flips, if it does you had a (one or zero) and if didn't
you have a (zero or one).
Designing circuits the transformer and the "bistable" properties makes for
interesting logic.
<In this case the current in the wire induces its standard magnetic field,
<but that field is _cancelled_ by the field already in the core, thus for a
<period of time the sense line sees no change in magnetic flux, and so no
<current is induced. Then however the core switches to 0 and the sense wire
<sees that change in flux and out comes the induced pulse now delayed from
<the initial point by a time controlled by how long it took to saturate the
<core and switch it.
Yep. Watching that spring snap in interesting on a scope. Those nuts are
slow too! Try a bunch of other materials now that your set up...
<The gap between the pulse start and the sense pulse is used to tell whethe
<or not the core had a 1 in it. Now in the DEC design what happens after th
<read pulse (which is really a "write zeros" pulse, is they take the data
<they just read and re write with the write ones pulse. However this time
<since the sense lines aren't needed to figure out what the cores had in
<them, they use them for "inhibit" currents.
They used seperate wires (four wire cores) in some cases as it was easier
that all that switching.
<--------------------------
<Cool stuff, now it raises some new questions:
< 1) Do you want your pulses to be long enough to switch the
< core exactly, or longer? (eg does writing a zero just cancel
< a one or does it cancel the one and write a zero in its place?)
I forget.
< 2) Why not just gate the write one current pulse? That would save
< on the inhibit current stuff.
well you have to know what your writing back and to do that you have to
read it first. Hence the common write after read cycle on many machines
>from the era of core.
< 3) What properties of a material make it easier to switch at lower
< currents? I don't want to build a core plane with nuts if I need
< 8 amps to switch them.
Good magnetic conductors that hold their magnetizm. Some steels, ferrites,
cobalt alloys, alnico, a few rare earths. Try some of those ferrite beads
used for bypassing in RF work.
Allison
<OK, how about it. Put a ring of compasses around the wire with needles str
<enough magnetised that they will stay pointing N-S around the ring regardle
<the Earth's field.
<
<Can you then flip them with a current? A very good visual demonstration of
<core works!
Yep, That would be good to watch but that's really a demo of the fields
around conductors (imporant building block).
Allison
Hi,
I was about to send this just to ccauction list, but I realized that some
ClassicCmp readers might not read ccauction ... and they might
have an interest.
In a rather misleading title:
"antique Altair-like HP-1000 M-series computer"
dschambe(a)uiuc.edu is selling a partially gutted HP 1000 computer.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=95719221
This seller has consistently refused to respond to my email about
two items that I got for low bids on prior auctions...so I have never
been able to finalize the purchase.
If anyone from this list does bid on the HP 1000, and wins, please
encourage this guy to honor his *existing* committments before
sending him money!
thanks!
sieler(a)allegro.com
Core memory, the saga continues.
Ok after spending much of the weekend trying to get my core driver working,
and feeling really good about having all the parts I needed in my spares
box, I realized I had built half of an h-bridge. Since I had already
designed a really nice MOSFET based h-bridge that could switch 10 - 15 amps
for my robots I slapped my head and went "Doh!"
Anyway, so I wired up my #2 nut with sense wire to the h-bridge and start
slapping current back and forth through my nuts. :-) Seriously though when
viewed on 'scope it looks something like:
+--+
| |
Ch1 -+ +----+ +-----
| |
+--+
+--+
Ch2 -+ +----+ +-----
+--+
UNTIL you get to about 7.5 amps or so, and then it looks like:
+--+
| |
Ch1 -+ +----+ +-----
| |
+--+
+--+
Ch2 ---+ +----+ +-----
+--+
So I stared at it a bit and the little bulb went on between my ears.
The first pulse "writes" a zero to the core, if the core is either already
magnetized with a zero, or has nothing in it, then the sense line sees the
deta-B (change in magnetic field) and a current is induced in the wire.
When the second pulse comes along it "writes" a one into the core, same
effect on the sense wire. The clever part comes when your "write" a zero to
a core that has a one already written to it.
In this case the current in the wire induces its standard magnetic field,
but that field is _cancelled_ by the field already in the core, thus for a
period of time the sense line sees no change in magnetic flux, and so no
current is induced. Then however the core switches to 0 and the sense wire
sees that change in flux and out comes the induced pulse now delayed from
the initial point by a time controlled by how long it took to saturate the
core and switch it.
The gap between the pulse start and the sense pulse is used to tell whether
or not the core had a 1 in it. Now in the DEC design what happens after the
read pulse (which is really a "write zeros" pulse, is they take the data
they just read and re write with the write ones pulse. However this time
since the sense lines aren't needed to figure out what the cores had in
them, they use them for "inhibit" currents.
Remembering that the cores were all written to zero by the 'read' when the
write 'ones' pulse comes along you don't want it writing cores that you
want to keep zero (they had zero before). So a current that is in opposite
direction of the write current is sent down the sense lines where zeros
should be kept. The magnetic field generated by these "inhibit" currents
cancel the magnetic field created by the "write ones" current and thus
prevents those cores with a 'zero' in them from being written to '1'.
--------------------------
Cool stuff, now it raises some new questions:
1) Do you want your pulses to be long enough to switch the
core exactly, or longer? (eg does writing a zero just cancel
a one or does it cancel the one and write a zero in its place?)
2) Why not just gate the write one current pulse? That would save
on the inhibit current stuff.
3) What properties of a material make it easier to switch at lower
currents? I don't want to build a core plane with nuts if I need
8 amps to switch them.
--Chuck McManis
PLEASE REPLY DIRECTLY TO THE AUTHOR OF THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE.
>Reply-To: <kenp(a)trlab.com>
>From: "Ken Peck" <kenp(a)trlab.com>
>To: <kstumpf(a)unusual.on.ca>
>Subject: Computer Hardware for Museum
>Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 16:28:02 -0400
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>Importance: Normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>X-UIDL: e7780be67b36c9d8688e16fdc0bca942
>
>Kevin,
>
>There is a Vax 6500 in Minneapolis,
>Minnesota that will be de-installed in June. I thought perhaps there might
>be some interest in the historical value of it for some collector or museum.
>If you or someone you know might be interested, please let contact me.
>
>Regards,
>
>Ken Peck
>Total Renal Laboratories, Inc.
>1991 Industrial Dr.
>Deland, Fl. 32724
>800.604.5227
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
Kevin Stumpf * Unusual systems * www.unusual.on.ca
+1.519.744.2900 * EST/EDT GMT - 5
Collector - Commercial Mainframes & Minicomputers from
the 50s, 60s, & 70s and control panels and consoles.
Author & Publisher - A Guide to Collecting Computers &
Computer Collectibles * ISBN 0-9684244-0-6
.
The previous comment should have made it obvious it was NOT within the reach
of the "average" American. First of all, it was over a month's pay for the
average American, it was equivalent to six months' groceries for a family of
four, and you could get a refrigerator or a washer, neither of which were
routine discretionary expenditures for the "average" American of that time.
That was during and immediately after the Korean war, when a 4-bedroom house
on a 1/4-acre lot cost $4600. That same house, now, in California would
cost you $4600 a month to rent. People's attitudes about what's important
enough to spend your money on have changed considerably.
$300 was not an expenditure an "average" American would consider lightly in
1952. That was the year I came to this country. There was an election
between Adlai E. Stevenson (Democrat) and Dwight D. Eisenhower (Republican).
It was BEFORE the first test of a hydrogen bomb.
People weren't crazy then as they are now . . . and all the loose nuts
hadn't yet learned to run to California.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Sellam Ismail <dastar(a)ncal.verio.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Thursday, April 22, 1999 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: The "FIRST PC" and personal timelines (Was: And what were
the80s
>On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Richard Erlacher wrote:
>
>> No, what's relevant isn't the technology and its state of maturity, but
the
>> comparison of the relative value of the numbers. Today, it's just
assumed
>> that if you buy an item for $300 and it subsequently breaks, you shrug
your
>> shoulders and throw it away. Back in the '50's, not many people were
silly
>> enough to do that.
>
>So what? $300, even back in the 50s, was still realistically within the
>price range of the average American. A multi-million dollar mainframe was
>not. $300 vs $$$millions is a significant difference.
>
>Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
>
> Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
> See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
> [Last web site update: 04/03/99]
>