--- Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com> wrote:
After I wrote:
> >I just bought the bare [Quest Elf] board.
>
> It was available as a kit but rarely did I ever buy the kit if I could get
> the bare board. I had (and still have) a very deep junk box.
In high school, I had enough of a junk box to build most of the Elf with
scrounged parts (I did screw up and stick in some 4001's instead of the
4011's the first time I assembled the Elf. It didn't work so well ;-)
Now, my junk box is *much* deeper. I could probably assemble an entire
PET PCB and Amiga PCB, just from spares. Thankfully, I don't have to.
-ethan
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
That was the traffic signal control system they wrote software for before
they got the MITS contract. They mumble its name briefly in the dialogue.
"TrafficNet" or something, I forget.
Kai
-----Original Message-----
From: LordTyran [mailto:a2k@one.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 1999 5:18 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: WTF?
I'm watching Pirates of Silicon Valley on TNT right now (yes, I'm so lame
I have my computer in front of the television) and Bill Gates is working
on a box... the dialogue infers that it is supposed to by an Altair,
but it's just a big box with four blinking lights (alternates - 2 red,
2 green) and reading paper tape.... next scene he's working on a PDP-8/?
(I I think, but I'm not up on my PDPs... not so much working on it as
having the machine open on his table... no soldering iron, manuals,
cards... I could have made the scene a lot better with the stuff in my
basement...)
Oh well.
Kevin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
"It's you isn't it? THE BASTARD OPERATOR FROM HELL!"
"In the flesh, on the phone and in your account..."
-- BOFH #3
<I don't doubt that it was possible to build quite a good computer from the
<board selection that the CompuPro line had, at one time or another. I
<bought about ten combinations they recommended, however, and not a one of
Try this,
STD Compupro s100 crate.
CPU-Z Z80
Ram17
MPX-1
DISK1
DISK3
InterfacerII
Runs killer, no repairs needed depite the boards last being powered in '92.
<Once there was a standard, I don't believe that any other single
I could never figure it out. If anything after working with Multibus,
Qbus and Omnibus s100 was pure anarchy though somewhat tolerent of bizzare
variations.
<manufacturer did more to undermine the standard than CompuPro. Their board
<were not all claimed "compliant" to the standard and even those about whic
<that claim was made often had little footnotes disclaiming certain things
<and indicting where they felt their board didn't comply precisely. Since
<that set a model for others, even if they didn't originate the practice,
Based on the manuals I have (fairly complete) and expereince they were
pushing IEE696 and no question their interpretation was somewhat off.
Then again my NS*, Computime and CCS systems don't come close either.
IEEE spec was pretty late in the game and was influenced more by the
intel cpu timings (8085 and 8086 series).
<non-compliant boards were proliferated throughout the S-100 world, spreadin
<non-interoperability throughout. This lead people to throw up their hands
It was already there, that was what IEE696 was supposed to fix long after
the barn emptied and burned. Like none of the Teltek (or Konan) cards
work in NS* crates due to some lines being grounded and the expectation of
address mirroring on IO.
<at the prospect of continuing to use S-100 systems in favor of the
<relatively risk-free SBC's which were becoming VERY popular, e.g. Ferguson
<Big Board, Ampro, et. al. and offered CP/M standard media compatibility at
<the disk level and all the basic features built-in.
That part I can't agree with more. S100 interoperability was at best
terrible and generally systems integration was a true challenge. My
Ampro and SB180 systems are compact, fast and worked (and still do) as
advertized! Bus based systems are flexible, but without well established
standards it can be tough to make them work with third party boards.
My qbus and multibus experience also shows with a good solid specification
it's still possible to produce a third party board that is marginal.
<The IEEE Std.696 board scheme couldn't survive if it wasn't sincerely
<implemented.
True.. it required lot of stuff including timing specs that most Z80s
didn't meet. It's worst fault was the adption was near the end of the
S100s life span when there were already a flooded market of non conforming
boards. While I was a user and adopted it S100 was a terrible bus!
Allison
I don't doubt that it was possible to build quite a good computer from the
board selection that the CompuPro line had, at one time or another. I
bought about ten combinations they recommended, however, and not a one of
them worked, so I sent them back. I still have a couple of their
motherboards in various cardcages. I will say one thing against the
CompuPro line, though, and I doubt it can be denied.
Once there was a standard, I don't believe that any other single
manufacturer did more to undermine the standard than CompuPro. Their boards
were not all claimed "compliant" to the standard and even those about which
that claim was made often had little footnotes disclaiming certain things
and indicting where they felt their board didn't comply precisely. Since
that set a model for others, even if they didn't originate the practice,
because they were at the bottom of the price scale, their non-standard and
non-compliant boards were proliferated throughout the S-100 world, spreading
non-interoperability throughout. This lead people to throw up their hands
at the prospect of continuing to use S-100 systems in favor of the
relatively risk-free SBC's which were becoming VERY popular, e.g. Ferguson
Big Board, Ampro, et. al. and offered CP/M standard media compatibility at
the disk level and all the basic features built-in.
The IEEE Std.696 board scheme couldn't survive if it wasn't sincerely
implemented.
(now I'll get off my soapbox . . .)
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison J Parent <allisonp(a)world.std.com>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: Compro, S100 & 8" drives
><That's a risky proposition. CompuPro produced some of the best but much o
><the worst S-100 hardware ever made. It seems that Bill Godbout would buy
><couple of boxcar loads of j-k flipflops and the next 5 boards his guys
><produced would be made from them. Nobody cared if they worked. People
><bought them because they were cheap. Interoperability was never a concern
><for Godbout. If it worked with ONE of their other boards, that was good
><enough.
>
>I have two systems and spares for two more and am using some of them in
>other systems, all work. From some 10 systems I aquired and parted out to
>several here. Those 10 systems ran a small company and I know their
history
>and the original owner would also argue they were solid. Generally the
>later IEE696 complient boards are very good and my experience over 20 years
>says they were one of the better vendors. HOWEVER::: The 696 complient
>boards often did not work in systems that were way off the spec or were
>pre696. My ALTAIR and the NS* systems are amoung them for the most part.
>the NS* mis uses a few lines so the timings are off and a few liknes are
>ground that would be otherwise assigned. Standard S100 problem till about
>'83-84ish.
>
>The most interesting and scarce bord they did was the MPX-1 an IO
>processing slave. I'm running one with a DISK-1 and DISK-3 in a z80
>system to offload the IO (most of the bios) and it's really a sweet deal.
>
>Allison
>
One other item, aside from speed to be considered when using this part, is
the current it will sink. The LS variety was slower, basically because it
used a slower technology. The 8T97 used essentially the same technology
internally as the SCHOTTKY parts the various vendors sold, but it had
stiffer outputs, i.e. could sink/source more current. Almost any part which
was as fast and would source/sink as much current, will generally bring
about the same behavior in the rest of the circuit. If the edges become too
steep, as you might see in the form of too much ringing or
overshoot/undershoot, soldering little 1/8-watt resistors in series with the
outputs will help. I'd say start with 47 ohms and go as far to the smaller
side of that as you like. Fairchild actually made a version of their
"F-series" logic with 33-ohm resistors built in to minimize problems from
both ground bounce and output edges being too steep. One other thing that
helps somewhat is to solder a small (<.001uF) high-frequency cap between
power and ground on the IC, straight across the back. The leads are long,
but it will maintain enough local storage to help with the ground bounce.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Monday, June 21, 1999 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: N8T97N IC, what is it?
>>
>> Jim:
>>
>> The 8T97 was also recently discontinued by Jameco.
>>
>> How does the propogation delay compare to the LS367? Tony said that
the
>> 8T97 has an 8us delay. ISTR that the reason to use the 8T97 was that it
had
>> a shorter delay.
>
>
>Yes, you're right. The same Signetics data book lists the 74LS367 as
>having a typical propagation delay of 10ns. Incidentally, if I claimed
>8us for the 8T97, that was a typo, I meant 8ns, of course.
>
>Anyway, the 74F367 (I looked in the Philips databook) claims a typical
>delay of 5ns, so that should easily replace the 8T97 (provided decoupling
>an layout is OK - these FAST chips like to cause ground-bounce, etc).
>
>
>-tony
>
<That's a risky proposition. CompuPro produced some of the best but much o
<the worst S-100 hardware ever made. It seems that Bill Godbout would buy
<couple of boxcar loads of j-k flipflops and the next 5 boards his guys
<produced would be made from them. Nobody cared if they worked. People
<bought them because they were cheap. Interoperability was never a concern
<for Godbout. If it worked with ONE of their other boards, that was good
<enough.
I have two systems and spares for two more and am using some of them in
other systems, all work. From some 10 systems I aquired and parted out to
several here. Those 10 systems ran a small company and I know their history
and the original owner would also argue they were solid. Generally the
later IEE696 complient boards are very good and my experience over 20 years
says they were one of the better vendors. HOWEVER::: The 696 complient
boards often did not work in systems that were way off the spec or were
pre696. My ALTAIR and the NS* systems are amoung them for the most part.
the NS* mis uses a few lines so the timings are off and a few liknes are
ground that would be otherwise assigned. Standard S100 problem till about
'83-84ish.
The most interesting and scarce bord they did was the MPX-1 an IO
processing slave. I'm running one with a DISK-1 and DISK-3 in a z80
system to offload the IO (most of the bios) and it's really a sweet deal.
Allison
Sellam doesn't like the movie because he's an early Apple devotee, and the
movie portrays Steve Jobs as an acid-dropping, drug-pushing, commune-living,
personal-conviction-abandoning, illegitimate-daughter-fathering,
beyond-workaholic, universally-disliked-yet-adored, employee-abusing,
god-complex-nurturing, business-disrupting idiot whom one expects to have
his employees drink hemlock-laden Kool-Aid at any moment.
Oh, and Wozniak is portrayed as a small, fuzzy bunny.
Does that about sum it up?
Kai
p.s. the Microsoft contingent gets off rather lightly by comparison, with
Bill Gates shown as merely a shrewd, somewhat ruthless, absent-minded
businessman with personal hygiene issues. Paul Allen is indistinguishable
>from Wozniak in the film, just standing in the background of shots, and has
about 30 seconds of screen time. Steve Ballmer, however, is played by
Krusty the Klown from the Simpsons.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:dastar@ncal.verio.com]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 11:33 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: Re: That awful show on TNT
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Tony Duell wrote:
> > I'm virtually apoplectic about this garbage that some of you may watched
> > tonight on TV (I certainly did NOT watch it).
>
> For the benefit of those of us who don't get American TV, could you
> please explain what this programme (show?) was and what it got wrong?
Its a "story" (fictional) about the early days of Apple vs. Microsoft. I
don't even want to talk about it really. Just know it was horrible in
every way possible.
If anyone dares to pipe up and say they actually liked it I swear to you I
will unleash such a torrent of rage upon thee so please don't. Keep it to
yourself for your own good.
Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
<I just bought the bare board. I may have mis-remembered the price. I
<know I got the CPU chip and 1822 RAMs from Hughes-Peters here in Columbus.
<also got the RCA VIP docs from them, too, when a friend cleaned out his fil
<cabinet.
It was available as a kit but rarely did I ever buy the kit if I could get
the bare board. I had (and still have) a very deep junk box.
Allison
Anyone know of a company/person who fixes/refurbishes/aligns floppy drives?
I need some old floppys worked on.
How about hard disc repair shops?
----------------------------------------
Tired of Micro$oft???
Move up to a REAL OS...
######__ __ ____ __ __ _ __ #
#####/ / / / / __ | / / / / | |/ /##
####/ / / / / / / / / / / / | /###
###/ /__ / / / / / / / /_/ / / |####
##/____/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_____/ /_/|_|####
# ######
("LINUX" for those of you
without fixed-width fonts)
----------------------------------------
Be a Slacker! http://www.slackware.com
Slackware Mailing List:
http://www.digitalslackers.net/linux/list.html
Hello, can anyone provide me with the voltages for the motherboard
connector of a Panasonic Businessmate (286) PSU? On the floppy
connectors, I assume that the red it +12V, the 2 blacks are GND, and the
yellow is +5?
Thanks,
Kevin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It's you isn't it? THE BASTARD OPERATOR FROM HELL!"
"In the flesh, on the phone and in your account..."
-- BOFH #3
This coming Saturday, 26th June 99, will be another in an endless
series of TRW Ham Radio and Electronics Swap Meets.. at the TRW
Plant in El Segundo, CA, from 7:30 to 11:00 am. The meet is held on
the last saturday of every month, no matter what.
From the 405 (San Diego) freeway, take the Rosecrans exit and go
west 1 mile to Aviation. Turn left (south) on Aviation [under the
Metrolink bridge] and go down about four blocks. The TRW facility
will be on your right, and the Meet is held in the southernmost
parking lots.
I will be in spaces J21 and J23, if anyone wishes to come by and
heckle me in person.
If someone has an item or two to sell, let me know via private
e-mail and Arrangements will be made.
Due to Ham Field Day activities, no brunch or will be held after
the meet this time. *Next* month, however....
Cheers
John
In a message dated 6/20/99 11:36:32 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
dastar(a)ncal.verio.com writes:
> I'm virtually apoplectic about this garbage that some of you may watched
> tonight on TV (I certainly did NOT watch it).
>
> If the facts and how they are perceived in the public's mind weren't
> already distorted enough, this show totally trivializes the recent history
> of computing. They would not do this with the Holocaust or Vietnam, so
> how dare they create such a blatantly falsified story?
>
> It will take years to undo the misconceptions and outright falsehoods this
> show has promoted.
was it really that bad? I wasnt able to view it. Please give some examples of
what was wrong with the show.
Despite your best efforts to keep me from helping you by dissing Microsoft
in your help request :), here is the solution to your problem from the MS
KnowledgeBase
(http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q191/0/64.asp)
Kai
Error Messages When Running TCP/IP-Based Utilities or Programs[win95x]
ID: Q191064 CREATED: 06-AUG-1998 MODIFIED: 28-MAY-1999
WINDOWS:95
WINDOWS
PUBLIC | kberrmsg kbtool win95
\* Security : PUBLIC
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
The information in this article applies to:
- Microsoft Windows 95
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
SYMPTOMS
========
You may experience the following symptoms when you attempt to use a
Transmission
Control Protocol/Internet Protocol-based (TCP/IP-based) utility or program:
- When you attempt to use the Winipcfg utility, you receive the following
error
message:
Fatal Error! Cannot read IP configuration.
- When you attempt to ping a Web site name or TCP/IP address using the Ping
utility, you receive either of the following error messages:
- Bad IP address <Web address>
- PING: transmit failed, error code 10091
- When you attempt to load a Web page using Internet Explorer, you receive
the
following error message:
Internet Explorer cannot open the Internet site <Web address>. A
connection with the server could not be established.
- When you try to uninstall Microsoft Personal Web Server 4.0, you receive
the
following error message:
WINSOCK2 is required to run this setup utility. Please click OK to exit
setup.
CAUSE
=====
This behavior can occur if you attempt to uninstall the Winsock 2.0 update
for
Windows 95, but it is not uninstalled completely.
RESOLUTION
==========
To resolve this behavior, follow these steps:
1. Click Start, point to Programs, and then click MS-DOS Prompt.
2. At the command prompt, type the following commands, pressing ENTER after
each
command
cd\<windows>\ws2bakup
ws2bakup.bat
exit
where <windows> is the folder in which Windows is installed.
NOTE: If you are prompted to abort, retry, or fail the operation, press
A.
This causes the Ws2bakup.bat to continue restoring up all the necessary
files.
NOTE: If you receive sharing violation error messages when you run the
Ws2bakup.bat file, continue with step 3.
3. Click Start, click Shut Down, click "Restart in MS-DOS mode," and then
click
OK.
4. Repeat step 2.
NOTE: If you receive error messages when you run the Ws2bakup.bat file
stating
that some programs cannot be run outside of Windows 95, disregard them.
MORE INFORMATION
================
For more information about the Winsock 2.0 update for Windows 95, please see
the
following article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
Q182108 Availability of Windows Sockets 2.0 for Windows 95
Additional query words: wsock
======================================================================
Keywords : kberrmsg kbtool win95
Version : WINDOWS:95
Platform : WINDOWS
Issue type : kbprb
\* Edit Status : Published
\* Tech Status : Reviewed
-----Original Message-----
From: Sellam Ismail [mailto:dastar@ncal.verio.com]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 11:15 PM
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
Subject: OT: Desperate for immediate help with Win95 IP stack
I would normally not post such a lame question to this list but I need
help desparately and don't have time to go wading through a haystack for a
needle. Its bad enough I have to keep re-visiting this problem of windows
deciding to kill itself every few months for the joy of it.
My IP stack is hosed on my Win95 machine. When I try to ping any host I
get "Transmit failed, error code 10091". If I try to run WINIPCFG I get
"Fatal error: cannot read IP configuration".
Since MS is fucked and doesn't have any sort of technical documentation
anywhere useful that would list these errors I must now try to go
searching for what this bullshit means. Unless you already have the
answer?
This started to happen after I had to re-install windows over the existing
install, because it all of a sudden started coming up with a "Windows
exception" during boot and would not boot any further.
TIA.
Sellam Alternate e-mail:
dastar(a)siconic.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
Hi. I got a Xeros workstation recently, probably a Daybreak. I
was able to hack the monitor a bit and connect it, but I'm totally
puzzled by the keyboard. Does anyone has any info about Daybreak
hardware (ou Xerox ws. hardware in general), namely pinouts, etc. I'm
really in need for that kind of info.
Thanks,
Cheers,
--
*** Rodrigo Martins de Matos Ventura <yoda(a)isr.ist.utl.pt>
*** Teaching Assistant and MSc. Student at ISR:
*** Instituto de Sistemas e Robotica, Polo de Lisboa
*** Instituto Superior Tecnico, Lisboa, Portugal
*** PGP Public Key available on my homepage:
*** http://www.isr.ist.utl.pt/~yoda
*** Key fingerprint = 0C 0A 25 58 46 CF 14 99 CF 9C AF 9E 10 02 BB 2A
> On the chance that someone else here might be interested, the
> arcade video game song classics Pacman Fever, etc. have now
> been released on CD. Check out:
>
> http://www.bucknergarcia.com
>
> Now maybe I'll replace my vinyl copy.
You throwing out the vinyl version? I'll take it! :-)
(seriously, I buy vinyl whenever possible, but I'd mainly rather buy secondhand
than pay new CD price for something like that.)
More seriously, I checked out the URL you gave, and it says "the 8 songs from
the vinyl version" but doesn't say what they are!
Does it contain the Space Invaders song? That's the only video game song I
remember hearing...
Philip.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
Power Technology Centre, Ratcliffe-on-Soar,
Nottingham, NG11 0EE, UK
Tel: +44 (0)115 936 2000
http://www.powertech.co.uk
**********************************************************************
That's a risky proposition. CompuPro produced some of the best but much of
the worst S-100 hardware ever made. It seems that Bill Godbout would buy a
couple of boxcar loads of j-k flipflops and the next 5 boards his guys
produced would be made from them. Nobody cared if they worked. People
bought them because they were cheap. Interoperability was never a concern
for Godbout. If it worked with ONE of their other boards, that was good
enough.
Dick (owner of lots of Godbout's hardware -and some even works!)
-----Original Message-----
From: Arfon Gryffydd <arfonrg(a)texas.net>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 8:38 AM
Subject: Compro, S100 & 8" drives
>I can grab a big Compro (model:?) computer that the junk guys says is a
>S100 computer. it includes two 8" drives.
>
>Anyone know anything about this box?
>----------------------------------------
> Tired of Micro$oft???
>
> Move up to a REAL OS...
>######__ __ ____ __ __ _ __ #
>#####/ / / / / __ | / / / / | |/ /##
>####/ / / / / / / / / / / / | /###
>###/ /__ / / / / / / / /_/ / / |####
>##/____/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_____/ /_/|_|####
># ######
> ("LINUX" for those of you
> without fixed-width fonts)
>----------------------------------------
>Be a Slacker! http://www.slackware.com
>
>Slackware Mailing List:
>http://www.digitalslackers.net/linux/list.html
I would normally not post such a lame question to this list but I need
help desparately and don't have time to go wading through a haystack for a
needle. Its bad enough I have to keep re-visiting this problem of windows
deciding to kill itself every few months for the joy of it.
My IP stack is hosed on my Win95 machine. When I try to ping any host I
get "Transmit failed, error code 10091". If I try to run WINIPCFG I get
"Fatal error: cannot read IP configuration".
Since MS is fucked and doesn't have any sort of technical documentation
anywhere useful that would list these errors I must now try to go
searching for what this bullshit means. Unless you already have the
answer?
This started to happen after I had to re-install windows over the existing
install, because it all of a sudden started coming up with a "Windows
exception" during boot and would not boot any further.
TIA.
Sellam Alternate e-mail: dastar(a)siconic.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't rub the lamp if you don't want the genie to come out.
Coming this October 2-3: Vintage Computer Festival 3.0!
See http://www.vintage.org/vcf for details!
[Last web site update: 05/25/99]
On the chance that someone else here might be interested, the
arcade video game song classics Pacman Fever, etc. have now
been released on CD. Check out:
http://www.bucknergarcia.com
Now maybe I'll replace my vinyl copy.
-----
David Williams - Computer Packrat
dlw(a)trailingedge.com
http://www.trailingedge.com
One of these beasts is available for the price of shipping (from zip 97339)
if someone responds to be by Thursday (6/24/1999). Please save this guy
>from the scrap heap. A short (two or three foot) cable is included, though
the power cable is missing. (Connectors appear to be 37 pin D-sub (DC37?)
at both ends.
Guestimate weight is about 20 pounds. Check your preferred method of
shipping.
No media.
Only one, so first-come, first-served.
Gary
I sold mine to a local guy last week for $300. The last one on eBay about
three weeks back went for $565.
good luck!
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom howe <howet(a)ohsu.edu>
To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp(a)u.washington.edu>
Date: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 3:23 AM
Subject: MITS ALTAIR 8-inch Floppy Auction
Hello:
I put an original 8-inch floppy drive for the Altair on Ebay. Go to this URL
to see a picture of the unit and to place a bid:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=120678854
--Tom
>Wait a minute.... You can order out of print manuals from Compaq? How
>much, and who do you contact? This sounds even more interesting than the
>pair I've got!
You call 1-800-DIGITAL, give them the part number (often EK-xxxxx-UG
or -MM or whatever), and they'll tell you about availability. Not
everything is available, but a fair amount of stuff from the 60's
and 70's is available as kind-of nicely Xeroxed copies of the originals.
Some of the copies are from microfiche and aren't so nice. It's hard
to tell beforehand how nice the copy you end up getting will look!
If you don't know the part number, a very handy tool is the DAS
(Digital Assisted Services) searchable catalog, at
http://www.digital.com/info/DAS-Catalog/dassearch.htm
For example, I typed in "RX0" and it came back with these part numbers
and prices:
H771-A Pow Supply RX01 (RX11) 60 Hz $276.00
M7726-00 RX01 Controller $405.00
M7727-00 RX01 R/W Control $152.00
M7846-00 RX01 Unibus $426.00
M8029-00 RXV21, Q-bus RX02 Interface $381.00
M8256-00 RX211 Unibus RX02 Interface $518.00
EK-ORX01-MM RX01/08/11 Maintenance Manual $ 84.00
EK-ORX01-OP RX8/RX11 RX01 Floppy Disk Sys $ 21.00
EK-ORX02-UG RX02 Floppy Disk System Users $ 21.00
EK-RX012-PS RX01/RX02 Pocket Serivce Guide $ 42.00
Now clearly not all the RX01/02 parts that ever existed are in
the above list, but it's a start. And it also shows you how DEC
manual part numbers are often constructed; "-MM" is Maintenance
Manual, "-UG" is User's Guide, "-PS" is the Pocket Service Guide,
etc.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927
Does anyone have a copy of the "IBM PC Network Technical Reference Manual"
(c. 1984) that they could part with / copy/scan a few pages out of for me?
I'm trying to write an RPL loader daemon and can't seem to figure out a
few things about the protocol. (I'm trying to boot an IBM 8227, which is
not-so-classic as the above book is.)
Also, does anyone know of something (besides LANtastic, which I can't get
to work), that will speak such an old thing as IBM "FIND/FOUND" RPL?
Thanks
af
---
Adam Fritzler
{ mid(a)auk.cx, afritz(a)iname.com}
http://www.auk.cx/~mid/
"Behold the power of cheese." -- National Dairy Council
>I just got a box of doc's today in the mail, and I'm totally fascinated by
>two of them. They're nicely done copies!?!? They have semi-heavy cream
>coloured covers with the actual cover xeroxed onto them, and the pages are
>xeroxes, but the right size. They're bound with the spiral plastic things.
>Does anyone know what the story is with these? Are these copies that DEC
>made, or did a 3rd party go to this much trouble?
If you order out-of-print manuals from DEC (err, Compaq) today, they
run Xeroxes off from originals - there's a special name for the facility
they use to do this, but I can't remember it at the moment. The
resulting document sounds very much like what you're describing.
--
Tim Shoppa Email: shoppa(a)trailing-edge.com
Trailing Edge Technology WWW: http://www.trailing-edge.com/
7328 Bradley Blvd Voice: 301-767-5917
Bethesda, MD, USA 20817 Fax: 301-767-5927