This weekend, I was given MikroKolor Color Graphics Interface by the
person who designed the hardware, Paul Andresen. The basic operation was
to interface a TMS9918A VDP chip to a TRS-80, Apple II, and S-100, and
the output was NTSC color composite video. A color modulator was
required to interface it to a TV. A two part article was written for 80
Micro in 1982 by the person who wrote the software, James W. Cole. They
took out full page ads under the name of "Andresen's Electronics
Research & Development, Inc."
>From their ad:
"The MIKROKOLOR Color Graphics interface is designed to provide the new
TRS-80 Model 100 portable computer with high resolution color graphics
and text capability, utililizing a standard color television or color
monitor. The MIKROKOLOR provides 256 x 192 graphics, with 15 colors plus
transparent. Its 3 dimensional Sprite plances provide for simultaneous
display of all levels. I has four modes of operation available:
1. Text mode: Provides 24 lines of 40 characters each using a 6 x 8 dot
matrix, and provides 256 user devinable characters.
2. Multicolor mode: Provides 64 x 48 color graphics.
3. Graphics 1 mode: Provides 256 x 192 color graphics, 24 lines of 32
characters each, utilizing an 8 x 8 dot matrix with 2 colors per
character.
4 Graphics 2 mode: Provides the same as Graphics 1 mode except allows 16
colors per character."
I'm curious if anyone else on the list has one, and has anyone used the
unit? It seems like it is a pretty neat unit!
Greetings, all!
I obtained a Cambridge Digital machine the other week at an auction for $25.
I am going through the box to identify what is in it. Being new in the world
of these sort of machines, I'm pretty clueless. I've figured out some of the
cards, but the following I can't identify. Can anyone help me find out what
they are and some docs or webpages about them?
I have listed the card #, where it's located in the machine relative to the
drives and the PSU, and any numbers, symbols, etc I have found on the card.
I have also on some of them listed what they might possibly be.
I have already figured out the processor card, which is an 11/73 processor
(KDJ11-AA (M8192)) and the hard drive is a Fujitsu 2312K. The floppy
controller is a Sigma Information Systems Floppy Controller. That and one
of the cards is a DRV11-J. The memory is Chrislin Industries 512K board.
The rest I'm rather clueless about.
Thanks in advance,
Nathan
tarsi(a)binhost.com
Card 1: Drive Side - Went to Tape Drive
LSI-50 Alloy Eng C.P.D.
DWG No. 100159 REV D
LSI-50 S/N-342 (C)1981 USA
FW100 159:37 REV 2.0
Card 2: Drive Side - 50 pin dual connectors
Emulex Corp (C)1982
ASSY TU0210401 Rev E
T/A Tc0210201-FSJ P.O.1446 3-25-87
Card 4 Right (Drive Side, Front Side)
digital corp
[CLKOVFL + STIOUT
40 pin connector (written) 76453 328D
EP057 REV J
8-setting DIP
Wire from the CLKOVFL to Card 4 Left
Card 4 Left (Drive Side, PSU Side)
Black Block1 (Smaller)
DC/DC Converter DTI5060-D
Block 2 (Larger)
DTS710-DI-A
DataTranslation
EP077A
20-pin connectors
RTC In from Card 4 Right (there was a wire connecting)
Data Acquisition Module
S/N 85874-345
EP073 REVJ (written) 85874-34J
Card 6 - Drive Side - Almost same as Card 2
Emulex Corp, Santa Ana, CA
ASSY SU0210401 REV G S/N 3332
on the biggest chip:
TODASSY SC0210201-CXL
S/N 73815
SUB ASSY 3332P REV G
W/BOOT
Ditronics 0284
WareExpo 5/85
Opposite side
PWB SU0210701 REV B
Card 7 Right (Drive Side, Front Side) - Terminal Card?
(C)1982 Technical Magic Inc
BOOT-HALT Jumper
S/N 1018
12K
BAUD Jumpers set 0-x,2-A,4-A,6-A
9-pin connectors
The Tape Drive:
Computer Peripherals Inc.
TAPE Products Division
Equip Ident NO BY5A3-B
Series Code 08
P/N 77014021
S/N 1287
50W
That's it! :)
Thank you so much for anyone who can help!
--
----------------------------------------------
Homepage: http://tarsi.binhost.combinHOST.com: http://www.binhost.com
Forever Beyond: http://www.foreverbeyond.org
----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
--
----------------------------------------------
Homepage: http://tarsi.binhost.combinHOST.com: http://www.binhost.com
Forever Beyond: http://www.foreverbeyond.org
----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
--
----------------------------------------------
Homepage: http://tarsi.binhost.combinHOST.com: http://www.binhost.com
Forever Beyond: http://www.foreverbeyond.org
----------------------------------------------
It looks like I'll be making a trip to Europe in late May or June. The
flight is to Amsterdam. Are there any places of interest to visit with
regards to vintage computers, swap meets, or collectors with surplus
wishing a small trade (fit in carry on)?
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
> Consider three hypothetical forms of source code:
>
> A: MOV AH, 2
> MOV DL, 41h
> INT 21h
>
> B: MOV AH, 2 ; character display function
> MOV DL, 'B'
> INT 21h ; DOS API
>
> C: MOV AH, DISPLAY
> MOV DL, OURCHAR
> INT DOSSERVICES
>
> I prefer B, but there were a few cases where I felt that he was tending
> towards C. (and plenty of times when I slip into writing A)
Yeah, the book is pretty much type 'C' code.
> Abstraction is very useful and necessary for some types of portability.
> But I don't like to have to go thorough a separate .H file to find out
> what the code is that is being abstracted.
Yeah, it's a hassle, but I think it's worth it to get easily-portable code.
Only a few lines need to be changed to move the code to another machine.
All in all I would recommend this book. Plus you, Fred Cisin, got double
kudos ;>)
Glen
0/0
> From: Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner <spc(a)conman.org>
> Then you haven't seen BrainFuck:
>
> http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/
>
> And yes, you *can* get a compiler for BrainFuck. Why you would, is
> another question.
Holy Cow! Why on Earth would *anyone* use such a language, or spend the
time to dream it up? I'd rather write machine code!
Masochists!
Glen
0/0
On Feb 28, 11:50, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
>
> Is there info somewhere that shows how symbols are encoded onto paper
> tape?
>
> Ideally it would include the actual hole positions like so:
>
> 8 4 2 1
> A: *
> B: *
> C: * *
>
> (Note: this is not an actual example but just an example of the format
> I'm looking for. Of course.)
Lots of unix (including many BSD/Linux) systems have a program called ppt
(usually in /usr/bin/games or similar) which takes an ASCII string and
outputs a facsimile of paper tape. The dormat is just ASCII in binary
form, with columns arranged exactly as your little sample above, except
there are 8 columns, and a hole represents a '1'. What you do with the 8th
coulmn depends; on PDP-8 systems the top bit was often set for ASCII (but
it has special significance to binary loaders), on some systems it would be
unused, on others it would be the parity bit.
Do a Google search for "ppt paper tape" and you'll find info about "ppt".
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hi,
I have just acquired an IPC with the basic ROM, a 1Mb ram board
and a second HP-IB board. I have downloaded the IPC images from the Peter
Johnson's site but I can't get the IPC to read them.
So I want to check whether the floppy drive works (the mechanism was stuck
and I have to take it apart and clean/oil the mechanism).
I guess that PAM is more or less useless, so I am trying to access the
floppy from Basic. Basic looks similar to that of the Series 80, but I
had no luck with the MASS STORAGE IS command. Is there a list of commands
somewhere.
Also I tried connecting a 9122D external HP-IB dual floppy, the system didn't
seem to notice it was there.
Finally, anybody knows how to format a floppy on the IPC?
Thanks
**vp
Hi,
last night was supposed to be the last time I was going to boot
VMS before it will be forever banished from my house (because
we finally have an Ultrix 4.5 tape and my uVAX-II runs NetBSD
and Ultrix and can write to TK50 :-). The only reason I had to
boot VMS once more was to write myself a uVAX diagnostic tape.
And of course, whenever you start VMS you're in for trouble :-)
I'll cut it short and ask your help for the following matter.
Part of the diagnostics tape procedure is to initialize a file
system on the TK50 with this command (I didn't invent this, it
comes right from a DEC supplied DCL script.)
$ INITIALIZE MUC6: ELAN
When that runs the tape scrunches and spins happily until
suddenly:
%PBC0, Port is Reinitializing ( 45 Retries Left). Check the Error Log.
%INIT-F-VOLINV, volume is not software enabled
What the heck does that mean? Yes I have VOLPRO privilleges and
I think the tape writes fine, as I have used it for other
reads and writes. It happens with both VMS 7.1 and VMS 5.4.
There is probably some "obvious" thing you have to do, but what?
Here is the error log, if it tells you anything:
****** ENTRY 3677., ERROR SEQUENCE 110. LOGGED ON SID 0B000006
ERL$LOGSTATUS ENTRY KA64A CPU FW REV# 6. CONSOLE FW REV# 4.0
XMI NODE # 1.
I/O SUB-SYSTEM, UNIT _MUC6:
MSLG$L_CMD_REF 61F60004
ORB$L_OWNER 00000000
OWNER UIC [000,000]
UCB$L_CHAR 0CC44038
DIRECTORY STRUCTURED
SINGLE DIRECTORY
"SEQUENTIAL BLOCK" ORIENTED
FILE ORIENTED
AVAILABLE
ERROR LOGGING
ALLOCATED
CAPABLE OF INPUT
CAPABLE OF OUTPUT
UCB$L_OPCNT 00000029
41. QIO'S THIS UNIT
UCB$W_ERRCNT 0003
3. ERRORS THIS UNIT
UCB$W_STS 0810
ONLINE
SOFTWARE VALID
CDRP$L_MEDIA 00000000
CDRP$W_FUNC 000C
READ PHYSICAL BLOCK
CDRP$L_BCNT 00000050
TRANSFER SIZE 80. BYTE(S)
CDRP$W_BOFF 0170
368. BYTE PAGE OFFSET
CDRP$L_PID 0001000D
REQUESTOR "PID"
CDRP$Q_IOSB 000001F4
00000000 IOSB, 0. BYTE(S) TRANSFERRED
I think it's got something to do with this "SOFTWARE VALID" status,
but what is that and how can I convince this thing to go ahead?
thanks for your help, this is just about the last time I'm going
to bother you with my silly VMS questions.
regards,
-Gunther
--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 02:18:26 -0600 (CST)
> From: Doc <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Apple SCSI TermPWR; Was Re: This is funny (ebay)
> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0202231908120.394-100000(a)lanshark.lmi.net>
>
> OK, maybe my deal is related to that, maybe not. It's been bugging me
> for a while, though.
> I have a number of older Seagate Hawk narrow SCSI 1G-2G drives. I have
> a couple of LC 475s, the SE/30, and a IIci. I've never gotten one of
> the Seagates to work as the internal drive on any of the older Macs
> without using a cable terminator. I've tried term power to drive, to
> bus, from bus, and IIRC, one of the 1G Hawks allows term power both to
> the drive and from the bus. Never works. Terminated cable always
> works.
> "Somebody 'splain this wonderment to me!"
Easy. Some computers with internal SCSI drives do not have a separate
terminator at the source (host adapter) end of the SCSI bus. They
depend on a terminator being present in/on the first drive.
With no terminator at all, the resting signal level on the SCSI bus is
not pulled up (to about +3V) so the open-collector bus drivers on the
host adapter or on the hard drive can't produce any detectable signal
by pulling the bus lines down to ground.
Computers that are built like this include some Macs, all NeXTs, and
probably others that I don't know about. Not SparcStations, they have
internal bus termination built onto the motherboard.
< http:www.scsifaq.org>
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenstein(a)ucsd.edu
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > Edward Yourdon recounts an episode in one of his textbooks about a
> > large assembly language program that was comment-free, except for
> > a single line (don't know the real processor so I'm faking the
> > instruction):
>
> Edward Yourdon. Isn't he the idiot that played Chicken Little before the
> new "millennium" and screamed that everything run by computer was going
> to break and we were all doomed as a species and we should all buy
> thousands of gallons of water and tons of food and bury them along with
> ourselves in a plastic bin somewhere out in the desert?
perhaps, although that sounds more like james martin's style...
Ken Olsen also said that no one would ever want a computer in
their home, nonetheless the products created during his tenure
remain very important, especially to people here.
Hindsight's 20-20, and lots of people get stuck in their paradigms...
> I don't think anything he says (or has ever said) has much relevance
> anymore.
No, like Brooks, he made points about the development of large-scale
projects which remain valid. Yourdon certainly wasn't alone in the
Y2K chiken-little mentality... and I don't feel inclined to consign
them, lock, stock, and barrel, to perdition, not quite yet, anyway...
:)
-dq
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > > I don't think anything he says (or has ever said) has much relevance
> > > anymore.
> >
> > No, like Brooks, he made points about the development of large-scale
> > projects which remain valid. Yourdon certainly wasn't alone in the
> > Y2K chiken-little mentality... and I don't feel inclined to consign
> > them, lock, stock, and barrel, to perdition, not quite yet, anyway...
>
> Look, as far as I'm concerned, anyone who thought the world would end
> after the clocks turned to the year 2000 are idiots and deserve to be
> ignored.
Ah, c'mon... if a flat-earther suggests wearing seat belts is a Good
Idea, you aren't going to stop wearing them, are you?
;)
-dq
Rest In Peace, Ludwig Van Beethoven is correct.
The programmer had finally figured out the original
coder's intent, and found it had nothing to do with
the program at all. The original coder seems to have
been amused by seeing the composer's year of death at
that address and added the comment.
The point of the yarn was to be careful in relying
on the comments. I've gone through source code where
I had a historical trail of changes, and found that some
programmers change the code but don't update the comments.
They should be shot for this behavoir, but then there
might not be enough programmers to go around...
...if only...
-dq
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Allain [mailto:allain@panix.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:15 AM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: Write only programming
>
>
> > 1827: MOV AX,0001H ; R.I.P. L.V.B.
> > Any guesses as to the comment's meaning?
>
> Didn't read it. Ludwig Van Beethoven (d.1827) seems
> to work so the comment says nothing. IE 1827 is 1827.
>
> John A.
>
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
> Joe Campbell and I spent a fair amount of time together while he was
> writing it, "RS232 Solution", and "Crafting C tools". I didn't
completely
> agree with his level of data abstraction.
Fred, what do you mean here? Too abstract, or not abstract enough? The
code *is* portable, which requires an certain degree of abstraction.
Please clarify -- thanks.
Glen
0/0
On Mar 2, 8:03, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> I'm afraid I can't help you with your list of questions. However, I am
> curious, where is this site? My wife just found me a 4th IPC a couple
> weeks ago, and this one looks to have HP-UX 5.0 in ROM. It's on my list
of
> things to get checked out.
http://www.coho.org/~pete/IPC/integral.html
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hello, <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
Im looking for a contact that would be interested in receiving laser
toner refill
kits for their printers or resale.
ADAM CDMicro
(541) 471-4133 x3105
(fax#) (541) 471-8836
For more info.
http://www.free-irewards.com/cgi-bin/adam/universal_toner_landing.html?m
v_action=returncampaign=ltgrf
Yeah-- After I posted that message, I looked it up.
I was very surprised to find a web page for MOUSE,
not to mention a personal web page for Peter Grogono,
the guy who invented it!
BTW--
He did write what I still consider to be the definitive
introductory PASCAL text: _Programming_in_PASCAL_.
Short. Concise. Just about everything you need to
know, without reference to a specific implementation.
Awesome book. They don't write 'em like that anymore--
it doesn't take up enough shelf space.
Jeff
On Fri, 01 Mar 2002 22:41:26 -0700 Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk(a)jetnet.ab.ca>
writes:
> jeff.kaneko(a)juno.com wrote:
> >
> > This makes me think of another 'minimalist' language:
> > MOUSE. I have a book about it here someplace.
> >
> > Of course, that been said, MOUSE is positively verbose
> > by comparison . . . .
> Somebody has updated it and cleaned up the code. search for it on
> the
> web.
>
> --
> Ben Franchuk - Dawn * 12/24 bit cpu *
> www.jetnet.ab.ca/users/bfranchuk/index.html
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
> I live in Kansas; where did Jim move to?
> Jeff
Yates Center. Southeast corner(ish), about 100 miles East of Wichita.
-jim
---
jimw(a)agora.rdrop.com
The Computer Garage - http://www.rdrop.com/~jimw
Bill,
I sent you a private email this morning, but your mail system won't take
delivery. Anyway, I have several unopened OEM CD's of IE4.01. Let me know if
you want one.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Pechter [mailto:pechter@bg-tc-ppp75.monmouth.com]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:27 PM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Wanted: Win3.1 IE4 or 5 install cabs
> I *believe* I have an original IE4 or 5 CD from M$. When I get home
tonight I
> will check out which version it is and if it has a version for Win 3.1 on
it.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bryan
My ie4.01SP2 didn't have it... I may have found 5.0 on tucows.
Bill
--
d|i|g|i|t|a|l had it THEN. Don't you wish you could still buy it now!
bpechter@shell.monmouth.com|pechter@ureach.com
I live in Kansas; where did Jim move to?
Jeff
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:00:39 -0800 (PST) "Zane H. Healy"
<healyzh(a)aracnet.com> writes:
> > > Jim and I are now working on getting the back rent paid. Once
> that's
> > > under control, we'll then start figuring out the best option for
> getting
> > > the collection back to his barn in Kansas.
> >
> > Hmm Red Slippers??? Well it worked from OZ.
> > Better get more room out there, because on your way back you could
> > make a few stops, wheel and deal and get twice the collection. :)
>
> Hmmm.... If Jim has a barn out in Kansas now, it sounds to me like
> he needs
> to stop by my storage units when he's retrieving his stuff. I've
> got more
> stuff I could dump on him (of course the last time it was his one
> son taking
> most of the stuff).
>
> Zane
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
This makes me think of another 'minimalist' language:
MOUSE. I have a book about it here someplace.
Of course, that been said, MOUSE is positively verbose
by comparison . . . .
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 23:34:28 -0500 "Glen Goodwin" <acme_ent(a)bellsouth.net>
writes:
> > From: Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner <spc(a)conman.org>
>
> > Then you haven't seen BrainFuck:
> >
> > http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/
> >
> > And yes, you *can* get a compiler for BrainFuck. Why you would,
> is
> > another question.
>
> Holy Cow! Why on Earth would *anyone* use such a language, or spend
> the
> time to dream it up? I'd rather write machine code!
>
> Masochists!
>
> Glen
> 0/0
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
I have a couple of extra copies of the November 1994
Walnut Creek CP/M CDROM available for a small fee.
Reply by direct email.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball
http://sports.yahoo.com
> From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
> Are you still playing with the Z-100s? I gave mine to Glen Goodwin.
> You've probably seen messages from him about them on the net. He's really
> giving them a work out.
Yeah, thanks Joe! These babies are *rock solid* and the docs are great!
I'm still working on my email project -- using a Z-100 to handle email via
TCP/IP. It appears no one has ever implemented TCP/IP on a Z-100, at least
under CP/M-86.
As nice as these machines are, I was really surprised to learn that there
is no active Z-100 group, at least not that I can find. There is a usenet
group which gets about one post each month. In contrast the ZX81, my first
love, still has active user groups.
Thanks again,
Glen
0/0