On March 20, Ethan Dicks wrote:
> In theory, I support this, but if it's possible to filter them down
> to their textual content on the way through, that might be good, also.
> I know that some people (very few) have technological impediments that
> force them into HTML (Outlook, etc., I think).
Nope. Even LookOut Express can be told not to HTMLize messages. Some
people use webmail services which spew huge amounts of HTML...but
quite frankly, there are plenty of such services that don't...and
anyone who chooses one that does should probably be suspended by their
toenails and pummeled into unconsciousness with an organically-grown
cucumber.
In short...there is *no* excuse for sending HTML email other than
inexperience or stupidity.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "Watch those lateral G's man,
St. Petersburg, FL I've got sandwiches in my lap!" -Sridhar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Lawson [mailto:jpl15@panix.com]
> Press-fit roll spindle with shaft encoder attached to one
> serial port on
> a PDP-11 running a backround job counting total turns,
> comparing against
> approximate turns-to-roll-exhaustion, and triggering (thru
> another serial
> port) an appropriate alarm, or perhaps printing out a TP-LO Warning.
Actually, I think it may be better to mount a strategically
placed laser diode, and a reflector on the opposite side.
That would take a visual cue at the point the roll got thin
enough to let the laser hit the other side...
> Now how do you tell if the previous occupant actually washed their
> hands?
A very low-power line running to the edge of the drain, that
would allow the water to complete the circuit when it hit
the bottom of the sink. You could couple that with a soap
dispenser sensor (Is that anything like conjunction junction?)
and get a pretty good test.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
On March 20, Doc wrote:
> > > Go stand in the corner.
> >
> > Oh c'mon Doc. Surely I didn't get you with THAT one. ;)
>
> It was just so *lame*!
Yeah, I know...I'm sorry. I'll try to do better next time. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "Watch those lateral G's man,
St. Petersburg, FL I've got sandwiches in my lap!" -Sridhar
> From: Ethan Dicks
>
> --- Hans Franke <Hans.Franke(a)mch20.sbs.de> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ben Franchuk wrote:
> > > > Glen Goodwin wrote:
> > > > > 1 -- Build an interface for every device under the sun, including
> > > > > the toilet seat.
> > > > That is easy -- a micro switch ... now how do you tell if the ROLL
> is
> > > > almost empty ?
> >
> > > Press-fit roll spindle with shaft encoder attached to... a PDP-11...
> > > counting total turns, comparing against approximate turns-to-roll-
> > > exhaustion, and...printing out a TP-LO Warning.
>
> Or an optical sensor mounted parallel the axis of the roll that would
> trigger when the diameter was too low. How about a color-based sensor
> that could detect the difference between the cardboard core and the
> paper? What about a shaft encoder that measures angular velocity...
> for low velocities, there must be lots of paper (when the roll is full,
> 3 squares per second produces, say, 1/60 RPM; but when the roll is nearly
> empty, the same linear pull rate produces 1/20 RPM - kinda the opposite
> of linear bit-density calculations on variable zone recording floppies
> and hard disks). There's probably a way to embed an inertial sensor in
> the holder to measure the force it takes to start the roll moving... the
> possibilities are endless!
>
- How about a TP holder that measures the weight? Or a spring loaded
arm, that contacts a switch when it get near empty. With a wheel at the end,
you can also have it provide drag on the roll, for spin control. Then it
won't be so easy for my cat to run all around the house with it...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> ----------
> From: Cini, Richard
>
> Jay:
>
> I like the HTML filter, although the number of HTML posts is pretty
> small.
>
> The only thing I ask you to consider is somehow obfuscating member's
> email addresses in the searchable article database. I've noticed spam in
> two
> email accounts that I've previously used when posting to the list. These
> two
> accounts I don't use in any Web-related way that could be clipped by a
> spambot (like posting in newgroups). That's why my MSN account is mostly
> spam but my work account and Optimum Online account are virtually
> spam-free.
>
> Obviously this makes it hard for off-listers to contact individual
> members relating specifically to that post. Comments?
>
> Rich
>
> ==========================
>
They can always send a message to the list itself to find someone.
Jay - Is there a reason that the Reply To All field only goes back to the
list?
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
> From: Jay West
>
> 1) Ok, here are the two things I was considering doing to change the
> mailing
> list settings....
>
> A) Reject posts to the list which contain any kind of HTML content...
>
Sounds good to me.
I think a Reply To Sender telling them why it got rejected might be
a good thing. Then we might not piss off some 70 year old guy trying to give
his F-1 a good home...
> B) I also like the 'self-policing' idea of making posts to the list from
> non-subscribers get a subject tag of [OL] or something like that. This one
> I
> am not sure how to do off the top of my head, but would think it pretty
> straightforward. Comments?
>
Another good idea.
Can't the system compare the From or ReplyTo field against the
subscriber list, and take action from there?
People like me might need some assistance here. You see, my _actual_
e-mail address is DAW(a)yalespress3.unipress.yale.edu. Yale ITS just provides
an alias for me which is David.Woyciesjes(a)Yale.edu. Both work fine, and I
think both are in the headers of my messages. Confuses some other automated
mail systems...
> 2) WRT the archives at www.classiccmp.org THAT is a project I have fallen
> far behind in. When I moved the list from the old ISP to the new ISP (me
> in
> both cases, long story)...
>
Understandable.
> 3) This isn't really important - just random "what if" thinking out loud -
> I
> was considering moving the mailing list and mail list archives off to a
> separate machine that does nothing but classiccmp. This is being
> considered
> for logistics reasons, not for horsepower/load reasons.....
>
Makes sense. Sorry I can't help with a case tho...
Many thanks to you and for your effort here...
--- David A Woyciesjes
--- C & IS Support Specialist
--- Yale University Press
--- mailto:david.woyciesjes@yale.edu
--- (203) 432-0953
--- ICQ # - 905818
Mac OS X 10.1.2 - Darwin Kernel Version 5.2: Fri Dec 7 21:39:35 PST 2001
Running since 01/22/2002 without a crash
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, minespower steel wrote:
> VERY CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS ATTENTION STRICTLY FOR YOU ONLY
>
> FROM THE DESK OF
> ALHAJI USMAN YERIMA.
> IKOYI, LAGOS.
> PHONE;234-803-3088-100
> BUSINESS ATTENTION.
> URGENT BUSINESS DEAL
If the number of these Nigerian scam offers I get is any indication, we're
now on a mailing list for these freaks and are doomed to receive at least
2-3 of these a week.
Now it is really time to clamp down on non-subscriber posts. I mean for
real. This is really getting annoying.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
Jay:
I like the HTML filter, although the number of HTML posts is pretty
small.
The only thing I ask you to consider is somehow obfuscating member's
email addresses in the searchable article database. I've noticed spam in two
email accounts that I've previously used when posting to the list. These two
accounts I don't use in any Web-related way that could be clipped by a
spambot (like posting in newgroups). That's why my MSN account is mostly
spam but my work account and Optimum Online account are virtually spam-free.
Obviously this makes it hard for off-listers to contact individual
members relating specifically to that post. Comments?
Rich
==========================
Richard A. Cini, Jr.
Congress Financial Corporation
1133 Avenue of the Americas
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036
(212) 545-4402
(212) 840-6259 (facsimile)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jay West [mailto:jwest@classiccmp.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:54 AM
To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: list changes & RFC on archives & rack chassis
1) Ok, here are the two things I was considering doing to change the mailing
list settings....
A) Reject posts to the list which contain any kind of HTML content. I think
this would be fairly unobtrusive - most people don't want HTML posts here
anyways. And - I would bet that most all SPAM contains some form of HTML, so
this might not get rid of all SPAM forever, but I think it would make the
very few that come here dwindle to even less. Comments?
B) I also like the 'self-policing' idea of making posts to the list from
non-subscribers get a subject tag of [OL] or something like that. This one I
am not sure how to do off the top of my head, but would think it pretty
straightforward. Comments?
2) WRT the archives at www.classiccmp.org THAT is a project I have fallen
far behind in. When I moved the list from the old ISP to the new ISP (me in
both cases, long story)... something broke in getting emails from the list
to the archive mechanism. I noticed this maybe a month ago, and when I
started digging into it I realized it was time for a change - the archives
there are not searchable and that just isn't acceptable. So - I have been
looking for software to HTML'ize the mailing list that allows searching as
well. I really need suggestions here as my initial searches came up less
than satisfactory. The archives are currently using hypermail. My criteria
is something that is FreeBSD and Sendmail friendly, and allows searching the
archives OR viewing them by thread. I don't mind if the emails need to get
stored in a database, but if they do, mysql must be the database used (picky
aren't I). The only package I found had statements all over it to the effect
that "this package will no longer be supported by the author". I did notice
the list archives for netsaint that are stored at sourceforge look REALLY
nice, and do allow searching, but didn't see a good way to follow threads. I
would greatly appreciate it if anyone can point me to mail list archives
that work well (for the user) and look nice (or to software for unix that
does the same). Please send these suggestions to me off-list at
jwest(a)classiccmp.org
3) This isn't really important - just random "what if" thinking out loud - I
was considering moving the mailing list and mail list archives off to a
separate machine that does nothing but classiccmp. This is being considered
for logistics reasons, not for horsepower/load reasons. I have all the
spare components (cpu, memory, drives, etc) but no spare rackmount chassis.
I can just order a rackmount chassis under my company which I'm perfectly
willing to do, but was wondering if anyone had a rackmount chassis just
laying around that they didn't need and would donate to the cause. The key
criteria - EIA units (space!). I would strongly prefer a 1U (1 EIA unit, or
1.75 inches) tall unit. We charge on rackspace by the inch, so I want the
machine to take as little space as possible so I can obviously sell the
rackspace to other paying customers. I would consider a 2U (2.5 inches) tall
unit (which I already have spare) as a fall-back plan, but definitely
nothing taller than that. Anyone have a spare laying around? If so, please
contact me OFF LIST at jwest(a)classiccmp.org
Regards,
Jay West
> Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
> >
> > I know there is going to be a catch to this...
> >
> > But which interface card will I need to add a TS05
> > (Cipher streamer 9-track drive) to a PDP-11/23?
>
> Why a catch? - The 11/23 has a low-order digit of three, which
> identifies it as a Q-bus machine. So you need a subsystem called TSV05
> (as opposed to the UNIBUS TSU05), and the controller is M7196. Takes
> 6.5A @ 5V, counts as 3 AC / 1 DC loads on the logic lines.
Why would I suspect a catch? From the conversations I follow
here regarding PDP-11s, it always seems to "depend"...
You should know this: I have *never* *ever* used a PDP-11.
I did use a DEC-10 extensively (including a little MACRO-10)
and a Harris 1200 (PDP-8 clone).
> > Like "which version of the 11/23", and there's an
> > 11/23+ too, isn't there?
>
> Right, but shouldn't matter for this purpose. Sure, the TSV05 is a DMA
> controller, so the number of address lines in the system is a concern,
> but, the /23 has at least 18 address bits, and that should do. (See the
> addresses from the manual: these show 6 octal digits = 18 bits!)
>
> Ah, well, there is an "extended features switch" (pack at E58, position
> 9). This switch must be "on" for 22-bit addressing (and for streaming in
> 100ips mode, IIRC). Maybe this is the catch you're looking for?
>
> I have not yet installed mine, however... - will be in a /23-PLUS.
> Currently, I only have a TSU05 available (and am still looking for the
> switch desingations...).
Ok, so I need to locate a TSV05 if the box by some chance doesn't
already have one (not in my posession yet).
-dq
Anybody need Indigo R3000 parts? I've got four or five machines with
system board and LG1 framebuffer and at least one SCSI drive sled
each, and at least 16meg RAM. No keyboards or mice tho.
If you're in the Austin area and ask nicely, I may just give you one
if you come pick it up and ask nicely.. If you're anywhere else, I'd
prefer small trades to make it worth boxing up and hauling to the postal
place (and you pay shipping, of course).
Just trying to clean out the garage...
Bill
--
Bill Bradford
mrbill(a)mrbill.net
Austin, TX
> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:10:09 -0600 (CST)
> From: Doc Shipley <doc(a)mdrconsult.com>
> To: Classic Computers <classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org>
> Subject: MVII Diags Chapter 2
> Sender: owner-classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Reply-To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
>
> OK, Friends & Neighbors.
> First, I'm starting to think that the original tape is damaged. The
> cptape utility suggested by Jochen seems to be Doing The Right Thing,
> but gets errors. dd has no qualms at all as long as the TKZ50-GA is set
> to a variable blocksize, but errors out on file #7. If I set
> "conv=noerror" for dd to ignore read errors, it saws away forever at
> the same file. And, if I boot the uVAX from either the original or the
> one "probably good" copy [1], sometimes it sees the RD53 disks as RD51.
> Not consistently. When it does, it hangs solid on a custom format.
>
> I'll be putting the -GA on a VMS box this evening and try the VMSTPCE
> copy. It makes sense to make the tape in its native OS.
>
>
> [1] I did get a good set of files with the TUHS cptape. Problem is
> that AFAICT the partner program, maketape, only understands 512*N
> blocksizes. The diags tape has a lot of files in 80B blocks. The good
> copy was made with dd, setting blocksize file by file. 82 files,
> that is....
Here are a few shell scripts that might be useful. Originally run on
Ultrix 1.2 on a VaxStation II but should be more general than that.
Written for the specific purpose of investigating and duplicating
MVAX diagnostic TK50 tapes.
carl
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
#! /bin/sh
# This is a shell archive, meaning:
# 1. Remove everything above the #! /bin/sh line.
# 2. Save the resulting text in a file.
# 3. Execute the file with /bin/sh (not csh) to create the files:
# tapemap.sh
# read_tape.sh
# write_tape.sh
# This archive created: Tue Jan 5 08:21:44 1993
export PATH; PATH=/bin:$PATH
echo shar: extracting "'tapemap.sh'" '(161 characters)'
if test -f 'tapemap.sh'
then
echo shar: will not over-write existing file "'tapemap.sh'"
else
sed 's/^X//' << \SHAR_EOF > 'tapemap.sh'
X#!/bin/sh
Xwhile :
Xdo
Xdd if=/dev/nrmt0 cbs=80 conv=unblock >>logfile
Xdd if=/dev/nrmt0 of=/dev/null 2>>logfile
Xdd if=/dev/nrmt0 cbs=80 conv=unblock >>logfile
Xdone
SHAR_EOF
if test 161 -ne "`wc -c < 'tapemap.sh'`"
then
echo shar: error transmitting "'tapemap.sh'" '(should have been 161 characters)'
fi
chmod +x 'tapemap.sh'
fi # end of overwriting check
echo shar: extracting "'read_tape.sh'" '(356 characters)'
if test -f 'read_tape.sh'
then
echo shar: will not over-write existing file "'read_tape.sh'"
else
sed 's/^X//' << \SHAR_EOF > 'read_tape.sh'
X#!/bin/sh
X# read_tape.sh
X# read MicroVax diagnostic tape into an assortment of files
X#
Xdir=/data
Xtape=/dev/nrmt0
X
Xmkdir $dir/hdr
Xmkdir $dir/txt
Xmkdir $dir/eof
X
Xmt -f /dev/rmt0 rew
Xi=1
Xwhile [ "$i" -le 108 ]
Xdo
X dd if=$tape bs=80 of=$dir/hdr/$i
X dd if=$tape bs=512 of=$dir/txt/$i
X dd if=$tape bs=80 of=$dir/eof/$i
X i=`expr $i + 1`
Xdone
X
Xmt -f /dev/rmt0 rew
SHAR_EOF
if test 356 -ne "`wc -c < 'read_tape.sh'`"
then
echo shar: error transmitting "'read_tape.sh'" '(should have been 356 characters)'
fi
chmod +x 'read_tape.sh'
fi # end of overwriting check
echo shar: extracting "'write_tape.sh'" '(348 characters)'
if test -f 'write_tape.sh'
then
echo shar: will not over-write existing file "'write_tape.sh'"
else
sed 's/^X//' << \SHAR_EOF > 'write_tape.sh'
X#!/bin/sh
X# write_tape.sh
X# write MicroVax diagnostic tape from an assortment of files
X#
Xdir=.
Xtape=/dev/nrmt0
X
Xmt -f /dev/rmt0 rew
Xi=1
Xwhile [ "$i" -le 108 ]
Xdo
X echo " file $i"
X dd of=$tape bs=80 if=$dir/hdr/$i
X dd of=$tape bs=512 if=$dir/txt/$i
X dd of=$tape bs=80 if=$dir/eof/$i
X i=`expr $i + 1`
Xdone
Xmt -f $tape weof 2
Xmt -f /dev/rmt0 rew
X
SHAR_EOF
if test 348 -ne "`wc -c < 'write_tape.sh'`"
then
echo shar: error transmitting "'write_tape.sh'" '(should have been 348 characters)'
fi
chmod +x 'write_tape.sh'
fi # end of overwriting check
# End of shell archive
exit 0
On March 20, Doc wrote:
> > Hmm, what about buffer overflow detection?
> >
> > Excessive packet...erm...length?
> >
> > UDP...User Droppings Protocol.
> >
>
> Dave,
> Go stand in the corner.
Oh c'mon Doc. Surely I didn't get you with THAT one. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "Watch those lateral G's man,
St. Petersburg, FL I've got sandwiches in my lap!" -Sridhar
> Does anyone here have any info on this old hard
> drive I bought at "Weird Stuff"?
It's a rebadged Fujitsu. AED used them in the WINC 08 product.
>From memory, it's 20mb.
Ian King wrote:
> Does anybody have a Digital DEClaser 1100 manual - I need one for
> a machine I have recently obtained.
I found the Installation Guide and Operator's Guide for this on a
colleague's desk at the weekend. I will scan it if no one offers the URL
of an existing copy.
Regards,
Paul
At 10:28 PM 19/03/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>With all this talk about making a LK201 work on a PC or vice versa - and
>this moderately-broken Amiga keyboard I have laying around - I was
>wondering if anyone could give me some info so I design/build an adaptor
>to make a PC (perhaps mac or some other KB) work with an Amiga? With the
>lack of a surplus of Amiga kb's on the eBay market, I was thinking it
>might be a worthwhile hack.
>
>Mostly I guess I just want a source of info about the Amiga keyboard (this
>is for an A2000 btw) so I could think about how I might design it.
>
>Thanks
>
>-- Pat
What is the problem with the Amiga keyboard? I repaired one of
mine (dead enter key) with parts from a Commadore 64.
Cheers
Charlie Fox
Charles E. Fox Video Production
793 Argyle Rd.
Windsor Ontario Canada N8Y 3J8
519-254-4991 foxvideo(a)wincom.net
Check out the "Camcorder Kindergarten"
at http://chasfoxvideo.com
> Now how do you tell if the previous occupant actually washed their
> hands?
On entry, the PDP-11 signals a bank of ultraviolet
lights that illuminate whatever bacteria are hanging
around ont he various fixtures...
-dq
> Hi,
> Does anyone here have any info on this old hard
> drive I bought at "Weird Stuff"?
>
> It's a Memorex model 214 - weighs about 50 lbs, has
> 4 6" platters I think.
>
> I'm interested in it origin, use, size, etc.
Dunno, but it's pretty cool. Any more available?
-dq
> From: Tony Duell <ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk>
> But surely, if you link up a different keyboard (good idea as the Zx81
> keyboard is unusable IMHO), and then use an LCD display then there's not
> much of the original ZX81 left.
Sure there is. If you change the keyboard and monitor on a PC it's still a
PC -- same for the ZX81. In most cases we're just adding peripheral i/o
devices, RAM, and beefier PSUs and mounting the whole mess in a larger
enclosure.
OTOH I saw plenty of plain black ZX81s at this year's meeting, used to
demonstrate software.
> > Sure, some of these operations are slow, but the point is that we're
doing
> > a *lot* with "obsolete" hardware. If we can get this kind of
functionality
>
> That applies to a number of serious old-computer user groups, actually...
Yup, it's great that there are so many people out there still fanatically
hacking so many different machines . . .
Glen
0/0
> From: Pete Turnbull <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
> > Wasn't the ZX81 board already prepared to use a 6116 instead ?
>
> Yes, it was. I put 6116's in several.
Pete, what modifications to the board are required in order to use a 6116?
Thanks,
Glen
0/0
Hi,
this was my first 5 hours trying to do just some useful work
with the VAX 6460 (phicus) under Ultrix 4.5, now that the
worries are beyond getting it booted and getting free from
VMS, I remember again how hard UNIX can be in terms of
compatibility (of course that's all nothing as compared to
how hard it would be on VMS :-).
I was going to build the essentials of the amenities of the
modern times, like gzip, GNU tar, bash and less, and Emacs
and gcc and GNU make.
All I did accomplish was to make Ultrix's date(1) Y2K complient
warping my system time from 1976 up to 2002 :-). The patch
is attached for those who have the sources. That was easy.
Now gzip would build and install without remaking everything
all the time because of my system time being decades behind :-).
Gzip was easy too.
Next was tar, and here came the first problems. The fact that
Ultrix' cc is a k&r compiler and cpp is somehow not up to date
is causing great pains. Lots of stuff fails because of this.
I did try the VAX C compiler (vcc), which supposedly is ANSI-C,
but it made the confusion worse.
Some locale stuff was a common theme of stuff failing, which
of course I hate. I never cared for locales, and I get
upset if some locale crap goes in the way of getting things
to work. But I figured, I needed to fast-forward my build-
efforts to GCC.
I have GCC-2.9x.3 (latest before 3.0) with an eye on making
NetBSD from that platform. First I had to make GNU make,
because the GCC installation procedure has become more
sophisticated. Building make almost failed too had I not
applied some broad strokes to make cpp and the locale stuff
happy.
Now with GNU make, that GCC build would still fail quite early
for some strange syntax errors reported by cpp.
I could actually build cpp and cpp0 without all the rest,
but putting GNU cpp in front of Ultrix cc didn't do much good
at all. Of course there may be lots of other things wrong, for
I doubt anyone at GNU/Cygnus has tested the autoconf process
on Ultrix/VAX lately :-).
So, I decided I have to get some super old version of GCC,
like 1.42 or earlier, that has a chance of having been tested
on Ultrix back then. From that platform I might be able to
move on to a more recent GCC version.
Tried to build at least bash, but once again cpp woes in
the lib/readline build (and readline is really my main reason
for wanting bash!)`That's where I gave up on GNU stuff for
today.
Tried some kernel making again, on Ultrix, both 4.5 binary
and 4.2 source. I think config(8) is indeed doing the symlinks
to the BINARY objects, so doconfig should not be required
indeed.
However, I cannot seem to be able to bump up my MAXUSERS
variable effectively. I have set maxusers to 128 but when
I try my 3rd telnet connection I am being sent away. I
somewhere read that Ultrix had some hard restriction to
cut more money out of per-user licenses. Any idea what I
might be doing wrong in terms of maxusers?
Tried to build the Ultrix-4.2 kernel from sources. Need to
supply the -s option to the config(8) command (to use
sources instead of binary symlinks.) However, the 4.2
sources seem to be incomplete!!! I am missing at least
sys/kern_lmf.c. Has anyone here ever built successfully
>from the Ultrix-4.2 sources? kern_lmf.c seems critical
and cannot be optioned out.
Tried to play with 4.3BSD sources, Tahoe and Quasijarus.
I must have FTPed the Quasijarus files in ASCII mode or
Michael is using a strange compress format, as neither
Ultrix compress nor gzip recognizes it as theirs. Noticed
that the TUHS archive's Tahoe version has some broken
files (as noted in BROKEN) that's sad. Tried to un-tar
the src.tar.gz of Tahoe to get to 4.3BSD's config(8)
tool (it's a good idea of Ultrix to put the config(8)
tool into the sys/ tree rather than the usr.(s)bin/
tree.) That's where I noticed that the src.tar.gz
is broken very early in the process. May be with GNU
tar it could find a point to continue after the error,
but then I need to build GNU tar first.
Ah, the worries of UNIX. But it was always fun and never
so frustrating as to make me want to throw hammers
like I want to when I am stuck with VMS. Of course I
appreciate tips as to how modern GNU stuff is built
on Ultrix.
regards,
-Gunther
--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D. gschadow(a)regenstrief.org
Medical Information Scientist Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960 http://aurora.regenstrief.org
Hi,
Does anyone here have any info on this old hard
drive I bought at "Weird Stuff"?
It's a Memorex model 214 - weighs about 50 lbs, has
4 6" platters I think.
I'm interested in it origin, use, size, etc.
Thanks!
Steve.
pics here:
http://68.5.43.239:8000/amigapics/hd1.jpghttp://68.5.43.239:8000/amigapics/2.jpg
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/
I know there is going to be a catch to this...
But which interface card will I need to add a TS05
(Cipher streamer 9-track drive) to a PDP-11/23?
Like "which version of the 11/23", and there's an
11/23+ too, isn't there?
I'm not sure of which it might be; I have a photo,
but it's not very high-res.
tia,
-doug q
On March 20, Doc wrote:
> > > 1 -- Build an interface for every device under the sun, including the
> > > toilet seat.
> >
> > That is easy -- a micro switch ... now how do you tell if the ROLL is
> > almost empty ?
>
> Ummm, an infrared laser & sensor array at the crucial point?
Hmm, what about buffer overflow detection?
Excessive packet...erm...length?
UDP...User Droppings Protocol.
Eeew.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire "Watch those lateral G's man,
St. Petersburg, FL I've got sandwiches in my lap!" -Sridhar
Almost two years ago I received a VAX 4000 100 on "long term loan"
>from a local university.
It has served faithfully, building three OpenBSD/vax releases and many
snapshots between then and now, but... last night it quit!
Luckily, it appears to be only the power supply at fault. Results of
two attempts at firing the machine up:
: KA52-A V1.1, VMB 2.14
: Performing normal system tests.
: 72..71..70..69..68..67..66..65..64..63..62..61..60..59..
: KA52-A V1.1, VMB 2.14
: Performing normal system tests.
: 72..71..70..69..68..67..66..65..64..
It runs for a bit, and powers off.
I've isolated the power supply from the machine, and nothing is
obviously burned out, but it still only runs for a second or two.
So I find myself in need of a replacement PSU. I believe that even an
older MicroVAX 3100 system can donate a compatible unit, and if you have
such hardware you can raid, please find a screwdriver and let me know.
It's important this machine or its successor be back building soon, and
if desired I will pay for shipping of suitable hardware from anywhere in
North America to here, Vancouver, Canada.
BTW, if you happen to be in South America or Western Europe, and have a
VAX you don't know what to do with, let me hear about this as well. We
have developers in Argentina and France who are eager to obtain machines
of their own to hack on.
Thanks folks,
/Hugh