1. Model 100 in black plastic briefcase style carrying case from Radio
Shack. In it was a Model 100 with a black leather case, a Radio Shack
cassette player in it's own black leather case model 26-1209, half dozen
different cables, 2 cassette tapes in cases, a two piece acoustic
coupler (25-3805) for the model 100. Pretty cool little setup.
2. Apple LC580 all-in-one unit
3. Tandy 4000 cpu only
4. Apple III monitor
5. Radius Color Pivot monitor
6. Mac 6500/250 tower with built-in Zip drive
7. Tektronix type 561A Oscilloscope comes with a type 3A6 Dual-Trace
amplifier and type 3B3 time Base. Guy let me have it for $2
8. Unisys flat tape drive
9. Atari LYNX unit with ac adapter
10. Manual for the Black Mac TV
And more items than I can list due to their age (less than 10).
willing to do work on classic (read not easily replacable) machines?
Specifically I'm interested in adding SOJ RAM to some proprietary SGI SIMMS,
and possibly SOJ RAM to a SPARCBook2 CPU board. The chip spacing is such
that a soldering iron is not a viable alternative.
Thanks!
Bob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Blakeman [mailto:rhb57@vol.com]
> I remember a patch or add-on that was referred to as Win 3.2 - added
> supposedly 32 bit features to the old WIn3.x and I think was
> just really a
> tinkering project in the development of 95. One of the things that I
> remember in it was the first signs of SolFree but since I
> rarely play games
> it never really grabbed me that much.
Sure. You're thinking of "win32s," which was an add-on to kind of
poorly retrofit windows 3.1 with some "nt features." It is very
similar to the later windows 95, in fact, and some versions of the
microshaft development products would allow you to produce apps that
used a somewhat limited subset of the win32 api, which would work on
any of the three systems.
I seem to remember that win32s may have been rather limited in what
it could draw to the screen -- being still only able to really use
windows 3.1 widgets, and that there were a few file handling
conveniences that weren't added in. It has been a while, though.
FWIW, many windows programs (understandably -- things like mpeg players,
Mosaic, etc, etc...) used to require this. It was distributed, and may
still be distributed, for free.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> Over the last 25+ years, I have known quite a few people who
> have worked
> at MICROS~1, who were nevertheless good people. (fewer and fewer now)
Oops! I wanted to reply to this point too. Since it's only arguably
topical, I'll keep it short.
I agree. It's certainly possible, given the size of their organization,
that some of them are fine, intelligent people. They obviously don't
run the place, but they may be there, nonetheless. I have no personal
problem with any one of their employees, no matter what the company as
a whole does. I'd hope that everyone else thinks that way too, but
obviously that's not the case.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> they will be appropriate. They did PLENTY of stuff to
> complain about that
> is ON-topic! The Windoze 3.10 Beta program (August 1991)
Yep, and the complaints I have mostly regard the quality of
their work in general, and are timeless ;)
> 'Course for us old farts, it's hard to accept that even Amiga
> and Mac or
> on-topic. Were they really THAT long ago?
No (not that I consider myself an "old fart," you understand...),
they weren't. Ten years isn't long.
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Cisin (XenoSoft) [mailto:cisin@xenosoft.com]
> On Thu, 9 May 2002, moog53 wrote:
> > Isn't coco a code for smartcard..if so, how does one
> acquire the code..??
> On THIS list, Coco is short for the Radio Shack "Color Computer".
> All you need to do is disassemble the 6809 code in the ROMs.
Yep. Hmm... You "aint from around here," are you? ;)
Chris
Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
Amdocs - Champaign, IL
/usr/bin/perl -e '
print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
'
That's a good lesson for we scroungers.
I ALWAYS check for unusual parts when I go to a new electronic parts place. I almost always find something interesting. I went in a place a few weeks ago and found a NIB Intel bubble memory. I check for HP-IL cables (surplus places NEVER know what they are!), Intel 4xxx parts, etc etc.
Joe
At 06:18 PM 5/8/02 -0500, Toth wrote:
>This certainly has to be one of my better finds to date. I'm now the proud
>owner of 6 brand new i8008 cpus (sorry, not for trade, as I have plans for
>these.) Finding them the way I did was kinda strange... A couple of days
>ago, on a whim, I called a local electronics dealer and asked if they had
>any i8008 chips in stock, and much to my amazement, he had 6 in the parts
>bin. :)
>
>-Toth
>
>
From: Sellam Ismail <foo(a)siconic.com>
>
>It was in UCSD Pascal (on an Apple ][).
As did the Z80 version and the NS* implmentation.
>Anyway, Pascal blows.
I disagree. The UCSD version was an excellent teaching tool but
slower than sludge due to the P-code thing. Later implementations
namely JRT and Borland were very useful tools.
If Pascal did one thing it whetted the appetite for better languages than
Dartmuth Basic or worse Integer basics.
My own $0.02, Pascal is a good language and well suited to what I call
fairly big tasks like databases and other fairly complex tasks on data
structures. I also use Assembler, C, DCL, PAL and even QB45/dos for
various tasks depending on the platform and task.
Other than that, computer HLLs are like religion, hold the evangelism
to a dull roar as the music section may not listen and the non believers
have left the room. ;)
Allison
On May 9, 0:28, Tony Duell wrote:
> > > To upgrade Indigo 4MB SIMMs, you need to find eight 514400 (or
equivalent)
> > > 80ns DRAMs in 26/20-pin SOJ package, and eight SMD decoupling
capacitors
> > > (sorry, don't remember the value but such caps are usually about
> > > 100-200nF). The capacitors are fitted in positions marked C3, C4,
C8, C9,
> > > C12, C13, C17, C18 on the DRAM side, before the DRAMs (which cover
them).
> >
> > Sounds easy enough. Now all I need to do is find someone with an SMD
rework
> > station. ^_^ This'd be a good time to see about upgrading my
SPARCBook2 to
>
> For something like this you could probably use a fine-tipped soldering
> iron and fine silver-loaded solder. You'll have to work slowly and
> carefully, but SMD soldering is possible with normal hand tools...
Indeed it is, and that's what I'd often do, but in this case the DRAMs are
very close together and I don't think it's possible to get even the finest
tip in between, certainly not at the angle needed to get to the pads under
the J-leads.
I used a hot air gun last time -- similar to the type used
for paint stripping or heat-shrink tubing, except that mine is
thermostatically controlled. Use lots of flux, or tiny amounts of fresh
SMD rework solder paste, keep the board level and firmly supported, and
practice on a scrap item first.
Given the lack of space between the ICs, if you do know someone with a
proper SMD rework station, that would be safer. It's worth mentioning that
last time I showed this to someone who does this sort of rework
periodically, the first reaction was a sharp intake of breath!
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
> Chris <mythtech(a)mac.com> wrote:
> > >Usually gets tossed as the reels are removed from the box as it has
> > >no further function. Unless, of course, your operators are
> > >fun-loving sorts who like to throw write rings at each other and
> > >relish the opportunity to throw something that looks similar when
> > >it's moving fast but is a bit less flexible.
>
> > Like AOL cds. :-)
>
> This was the 1980s. Plans to dominate the computer room based on
> accumulating two solar masses of AOL CDs weren't yet feasible.
heh...
Does anyone recall how environmentalists were in a tizzy about
write-enable rings? Seems that like six-pack rings, they were
being found washed up on shorelines, and birds were getting
caought in them or something like that... I recall a photo
accompanying an article in Time magazine showing a guy knealing
down a picking one up out of the sand...
-dq
> I remember a patch or add-on that was referred to as Win 3.2 - added
> supposedly 32 bit features to the old WIn3.x and I think was just really a
> tinkering project in the development of 95.
You're thinking of Win32S, which was the first attempt at a 32-bit extension
to the Windows API. Not Windows 3.2. :) I think OS/2 can run Win32S programs
natively through Win-OS2.
--
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>, icq=10317253
Nice keyboard and gas plasma display, makes a good semi-portable
terminal and/or text processor.
12 (6) MHz 286, 1MB RAM, 640x400 (25x80) orange display, 3.5 HD FDD,
20/40MB IDE HD, 1 8bit 1/2 length ISA slot (or proprietary T3100).
AC only, external RGB & Kbd, Cen Par or Ext 5 1/4FDD, 2xRS232.
Have owned one since new & have manuals & system utilities if anybody
needs anything.
mike
------------Original Message---------------
From: "Jay West" <jwest(a)classiccmp.org>
I have seen some discussion on the list recently regarding the Toshiba 3100
laptops...
I was just curious - is there some reason that these are sought after?
<snip>
A couple days ago, while dumpster diving I ran across a CD that had "MS
Windows 3.2" on it. Unfortunatly it's Chinese, so I doubt I'd be able to
make much sense of it :^)
Was this a Chinese only version, or was there also an English version? I
think this is the first I've ever heard of such a version.
Zane
>especially if it has
>a cross section in the shape of a sideways "T".
Yes, has that cross section... it would have been much easier to tell
that if I wasn't forced to scan them on the flatbed scanner.
Lucky for me, my mini digital camera comes in tomorrow, so I can start
keeping it at work for these types of things.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
In a message dated 5/8/2002 11:28:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
spectre(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu writes:
> > I was just using Calmira, makes windows 3.1 look like windows 95.
>
> Calmira is indeed very neat. I use it on my lone Windows machine (the only
> other Windows machine in the apartment is the Macintosh! under VPC, natch).
> It makes the W3.1 interface more contemporary, at least. :-)
>
There's also an update that IBM made that makes 3.1 have an OS/2 WPS
appearance. So much better that way!
On May 8, 15:24, Robert F Schaefer wrote:
> I'll spend a little more time looking into that. I believe the ealier
PIs
> take standard parity SIMMs, but I thought the 4D/35s take a differrent
SIMM
> from everything else. Be nice if I could bump them up to 8 MB.
Yes, the early PI's take standard 30-pin SIMMs.
To upgrade Indigo 4MB SIMMs, you need to find eight 514400 (or equivalent)
80ns DRAMs in 26/20-pin SOJ package, and eight SMD decoupling capacitors
(sorry, don't remember the value but such caps are usually about
100-200nF). The capacitors are fitted in positions marked C3, C4, C8, C9,
C12, C13, C17, C18 on the DRAM side, before the DRAMs (which cover them).
I thought I remebered changing a resistor on the other side (ASIC side) but
I just compared a 4MB to an 8MB, and they have the same resistors, so I
must have been thinking of something else.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Just got back from an auction. One of the things that I got in my lot was an Adtech AX/3000 Cell Data Generator. A quick Google search revealed that this is for generating and testing ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode) data on T-1 through OC-3 networks. Can somebody give me a better expanation (in plain english!)? Also any suggestions of what I do with it?
Joe
>The MAC, for example,
I have been ignoring this, but I just can't any more.
Mac, as in Macintosh, as in the computer made by Apple Computer, is not
MAC or MacIntosh, or otherwise. It is either "Macintosh", "Mac", or "mac".
MAC (all caps) means something entirely different. (Media Access Control).
I know you like to make sure your grammer and spelling is correct, so I
figured I should point out the painfully mistake you have been making
thru all your conversations.
And now I return you to the regularly scheduled thread.
>If it were so bad, would people really buy it if something
>better, or even close to equal were offered anywhere?
Yes. Window IS perfect proof of this. You will be hard pressed to find
people that use multiple different OSes including Windows, and honestly
believe Windows is the "best of the bunch". There are some, but then for
any idea, you will always find some that believe the idea is the best. (I
am discounting all arguments regarding having to use windows or any OS by
neccessity. If the app you need is only for one OS, you use that OS
regardless of if it is great or a peice of crap).
And of course you are missing the fact that most people are too ignorant,
and/or don't care enough to educate themselves to the fact that there ARE
viable alternatives, many of which are far superior.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
The 4D20 and 4D25 used standard pc-type simms (w/parity),
the 4D/30, 4D/35 and R3K Indigo used an SGI proprietary
simm, identifiable by the large interleave controller chip
on one side of the simm. Did someone already mention that
you can only have 1 bank of 4Mb simms in a system, due to
a prom bug? There is no restriction on the number of other size
simms.
-al-
-acorda(a)1bigred.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert F Schaefer [mailto:rschaefe@gcfn.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:24 PM
> To: classiccmp(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: Re: IRIX on Personal Iris
>
>
> > On May 7, 20:38, Robert Schaefer wrote:
> >
> >> > You can upgrade a 4MB SIMM to an 8MB one very easily --
> just add the
> > chips
> >> > and change one (? IIRC) SMD resistor.
> >>
> >> Verrrryyyy interesting. Are these the PI 4D/35 specific
> SIMMS you are
> >> refering to? I do have at least four 4MB SIMMS installed.
> >
> > I meant Indigo SIMMs, but I *AFAIK* the 4D/35 uses the same SIMMs.
>
> I'll spend a little more time looking into that. I believe
> the ealier PIs
> take standard parity SIMMs, but I thought the 4D/35s take a
> differrent SIMM
> from everything else. Be nice if I could bump them up to 8 MB.
>
>
> Thanks for the info!
>
> >
> > --
> > Pete Peter Turnbull
>
> Bob
>
> cvisors(a)carnagevisors.net wrote:
> > Hi peoples,
> >
> > sort of off topic but just saw this
> > http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press/07may02b.htm
> >
> > True 64 is being dropped and HP-UX will be hp/compaq's UNIX product,
> >
> > and then this
> >
> > HP also will deliver on the previously announced Compaq OpenVMS. roadmap,
> > including the port to Itanium.
>
> Started to post that last night, but never got around to it. It's not
> that off-topic, and I sure hope the new company keeps tabs on the stuff
> that gets dropped. Several other people besides myself would like to
> know the copyright status and location and accessibility of technical
> info and any remaining parts for the TI DSG assets HP acquired in '92,
> for example.
Unfortunately,
Bob Supnik's been unable to get them to budge on some HP2100
software, and effort by others to get them to free up the
Apollo copyrights have also seen no success.
Sad to say it, but it's always easier to say "no". Less
research involved...
-dq
Does anyone know what these are for? <http://www.mythtech.net/rings.jpg>
Excuse the 2d scan, my digital camera is at home, so I just tossed them
on my flatbed scanner for the pic.
I think they are rings for the tapes used on my old Zebra system (IIRC,
it had some reel like tape canisters that fit in the top of it, but this
is going WAY back).
I found them in a drawer of a desk that was in the room that housed my
Zebra.
I don't want them, and am planning to pitch them, but before I did, I
figured I would see if anyone knew what they were for, and if anyone
wanted them.
I have about 2 dozen of the yellow ones, and 5 or 6 of the orange ones
(although not all orange, some are white/clear).
Anyone that wants them, they are yours for postage.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>