Hello:
I am new to this listing, so please bear with me.
I have a couple of Apple II+ computers circa 1979-1980 - were working when shut down many years ago. Is there a market for these? or should I put in trash?
Thanks.
Ken Bradley
Ken Bradley
Bradley & Associates
859.344.1965
859.344.1967 (Fax)
bradleyandassociates(a)choice.net
http://users.choice.net/~bradl/
Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
Thank you. Bradley & Associates
In a message dated 1/13/2003 3:20:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jrkeys(a)concentric.net writes:
<< > I am looking for a good, cheap PS/2 Model 25 (sx I think). It's the
> all-in-one model, with the screen built into the computer itself. It
should
> have at least one disk drive, hard drive and a keyboard and mouse would be
> nice.
> >>
they can be found, but are QUITE heavy!
You know you're (I'm) a geek when you're interested in buying CD's with high
rez pix of naked computers <grin>.
I too would love to have a copy of the CD - I wonder if he'd entertain the
possibility of selling *that* on it's own...
Dennis
Glen,
Attached is a ZIP file with two JPEG images that are scans of pages from the
Osborne 1 Technical Manual that relate to the PS and wiring. They might be
useful to you.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: acme(a)ao.net [mailto:acme@ao.net]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 4:03 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Re: Osborne OCC1
From: Joe <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com>
To: Glen Goodwin <acme(a)ao.net>
Subject: Re: Osborne OCC1
Date: 01/08/2003 7:55 AM
> I recently had an OCC-1 that blew something in the PSU. That odd thing
was
> at it kept working! I wasn't really intersted in it so I gave it to Glen
Good
> . I expect that he'll troubleshoot/repai
> r it soon.
Okay, Joe, I get the hint ;>) I'll take a look at it this weekend -- should
be
a quick and easy fix.
Later --
Glen
0/0
Oops! This was not meant to go to the list, but if the images are useful to
anyone else ...
-----Original Message-----
From: Feldman, Robert
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:51 AM
To: 'cctalk(a)classiccmp.org'
Subject: RE: Re: Osborne OCC1
<snip>
If you still have these, I would like to have them.
Please let me know.
> I found a stack (3) of 'Fortran Coding Form' pads with an IBM logo,
> GX28-7327-6 U/M 050, Printed in the USA. Legal size (8x17)Nice light
> green, one stack is pretty nice, the others show a little yellowing.
> Don't know what dates these were available for. The lab I found these at
> was created in 1973, so that's a good limit for the 'Wayback machine'.
>
> I assume these are what Fortran coders would arrange their code on before
> translating the code into the paperpunches.
>
> Header fields are Program, Programmer, Date, Punching Instructions
> (Graphic or Punch), Page Of, Card Electro Number.
>
> The main area is headed up with Comm (comment?), Statement Number, Cont
> (continue?), Fortran Statement, Identification Sequence, followed but
> miscellaneous squares numbered from 1 to 80.
>
> Asterisked comments at the bottom are "A standard card form, IBM 888157,
> is available for punching statements from this form" and "Number of forms
> per pad may vary slightly". [snicker- especially if you pulled a few
out!]
>
> Anyone want For Free? I imagine it'd be a cool prop material for your
> classic cmp. I'll stuff it in an envelope and send it out bookrate.
>
> L
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Hans B Pufal wrote:
>
> > Zane H. Healy wrote:
> > >>It looks like Al Kossow is the high bidder now, and he surpased the
> >
> > > This is one system I *REALLY* hope he gets! I want to see scan's of some
> > > of those manuals :^)
> >
> > Seems like Al has been outbid, is it time to set up a subscription to
> > support Al in snagging the machine? I'd be up to subscribing $50 toward
> > such a project.
>
> Is it only me, or does that listing look like hammered crap in
> Mozilla? I'm on my laptop, which runs at 1400x1050 only, so I have the
> fonts juked up to 14pt. The text runs right over the bidding frame and
> most of the pics.
> It's not the font size either - I turned my fonts down to 10 pt. and
> no joy.
>
> Doc
>
Me to! Had to resort to IE to be able to read the whole page.
-nick
Those binders usually had useful information in them. And at least there was
printed documentation, as opposed to today.
As to the software, I wold hardly call it "infantile." Limited, perhaps. But
remember what programs such as WordStar ran under (64KB RAM for CP/M and
program code). I had WordStar on one 90KB SSSD disk on my Osborne 1, and
could put 20 pages of text on another disk, and do real work. SuperCalc came
on another 90KB disk. Try to do that with MS bloatware.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Tillman [mailto:ETILLMAN@satx.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:13 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org; cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: DOS 1.0
Hmm...
In the '80s, almost everything came in small, tabbed 3-ring binders, and
were all quite funny to read! :) Does anyone remember Peach Text, Peach
Calc, WordStar or any of the other infantile office software? They all had
'em...
Cheers...
Ed
<snip>
Any ideas where to find one now though?
Cheers!
Ed Tillman
Store Automation Tech Support Specialist
Valero Energy Corporation
San Antonio, TX; USA
Phone (210) 592-3110, Fax (210) 592-2048
edward.tillman(a)valero.com <mailto:edward.tillman@valero.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of "Fred Cisin
> (XenoSoft)" <cisin(a)xenosoft.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:02 AM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: RE: DOS 3.20
>
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, John Willis wrote:
> > IBM PC-DOS or Micro$oft MS-DOS? I have the PC-DOS 3.20 manual.
>
> The only difference that I found between them (except for certain highly
> customized OEM MS-DOS versions) was DRIVPARM. It is present in both, but
> is not documented in PC-DOS. It is incompatible with the IBM BIOS.
>
> (DRIVPARM worked with both PC-DOS and MS-DOS with three different generic
> clones; DRIVPARM would not work with either MS-DOS nor PC-DOS on real IBM
> AT and PS/2 (model 50?))
>
>
> Some OEMs included the "technical reference manual" as appendix to their
> MS-DOS manual. IBM sold it as a separate book after 2.00.
>
I found an IBM M$-DOS 1.0 manual (no disks sadly)
It comes in a three ring binder, and is quite funny to read, esp the errata.
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
**********************************************************************
I have been looking for a Calcomp incremental plotter and found one
in Bremerton, Washington but it is pickup only. Since I'm on the other
coast that isn't too practical. Is anybody nearby that might be interested
in picking it up and mailing it FedEx ground to me for some $?
Thanks,
David Gesswein
http://www.pdp8.net/ -- Run an old computer with blinkenlights.
Before the new year I had a lead on some parts and
said I would reveal what they were after I won or lost
the bid on them. Well I won.
What I got was a lot of EuroBeeb cards and parts.
For those that don't know the EuroBeeb was a BBC
Micro compatible computer but in a EuroCard (160mm
x 100mm) format. As well as the standard CPU, VDU
and I/O cards theer are a lot of digital I/O cards, analog
I/O cards and some specials such as EPROM programmers.
I also got the documentation for all the cards, the only
thing I'm short of is some of the system software.
For those who want to look there are some pictures at ..
http://members.lycos.co.uk/leeedavison/6502/eurobeeb/score/index.html
Cheers,
Lee.
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
Foil, or any metallic reflector, can produce hot spots. A large piece of
white poster board works better.
A trick for photographing reflective surfaces is to use a black sheet _in
front of_ the subject, and shoot with the lens sticking through a hole in
the sheet. In this way, you don't get your own reflection in the picture.
Hair spray also works, but might be hard to clean off. Spray laundry starch
might also work, but I haven't tried it.
Watch for glare off chip surfaces, which can make part numbers unreadable.
The trick is to have the light coming in at an angle that does not reflect
into the lens. A common setup is two (or 4) lights, one on either side, at a
45 degree angle (with the camera perpendicular to the subject). In this way,
the fall-off from the light on one side is balanced by the opposite fall-off
of the light on the other side, so the illumination is even across the
subject.
For 3D objects, it is customary to have the (brightest) light coming from
the upper left, so the shadows are on the lower right.
Sean's last comment is a good one -- keep taking pictures until you get good
ones. The only added cost is in your time, but then why take the time to
produce a poor picture?
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean 'Captain Napalm' Conner [mailto:spc@conman.org]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 10:03 PM
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Subject: Re: Old machine photos
> <snip> The goal is to light the computer well and
> eliminate glare - especially on screens.
A large piece of cardboard covered in aluminum foil makes a good
reflector, and to reduce glare on monitors you may want to try hairspray.
Professional photographers use it to reduce glare on glasses so it might be
worth trying on a monitor if you don't think it'll hurt it.
<snip>
If it's a digital camera, go wild with the pictures. Take lots of
pictures; more than you think you need. Then select the best from the lot.
Why not? It's not like you have to pay for developing the pictures.
-spc (Go for quantity, then select for quality ... )
Hello there, for those interested I've got a SEIKOSHA SP1000VC with the
C-64 cable. It has not operated in many years since I sold my c-64 a
very long time ago. But it worked flawlessly and hasn't been dropped or
abused since. For those interested I am asking for the first good offer
over $40us. E-mail me if your interested.
PETER K.
Look,
Just tell me how to remove my name. Please. I can never give any information
or help anyone. I am older and not interested. I have poor vision and to
delete so many emails is more than I can deal with. Someone help me get
unsubscribed...Please
YVONNE
Y
>Bill Bradford wrote:
>
>Anybody know if Mentec (http://www.mentec-inc.com) has just
>dropped their hobbyist licensing/cdrom plans?
The Mentec Hobbyist license is *broken*. Clause 1. says:
'EMULATOR shall mean software owned by Digital Equipment Corporation that
emulates the operation of a PDP-11 processor and allows PDP-11 programs and
operating systems to run on non-PDP-11 systems.'
It's crystal-clear; you can't run under the hobbyist license except on a
emulator which is *owned by Digital*.
There ARE no emulators 'owned by Digital' (or Compaq or HP for that matter).
So the Mentec license is no help to anyone who wants to run pdp-11 OSes on
emulation (SIMH, E11 etc), and stay 100% legal. It's no help at all as
regards running on acutal -11 hardware.
It's a very wierd term to have in a license... I guess this term is a
hangover from the days when Bob Supnik was still at DEC, and SIMH might have
become an official DEC project.
Mike
http://www.corestore.org
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> Then there were/are the Webbies...
>
> WebTV - Get youres' 2dAy!
Hey... I got great use from WebTV... I bought someone's used system for
$10 at a garage sale. Saved me $40 on the cost of the keyboard to work
with my Satellite Decoder... and I got a 1 gig IDE hard drive as a bonus.
:-)
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>> Do you have any tips for scanning books? Such as resolution, color
>> settings, etc...
And to go one step further... recommendations for what hardware people
use for scanning? I am thinking about undertaking some manual archiving.
Mostly so I can get rid of manuals that I no longer need, but might want
to reference once again some day in the future.
I was thinking of using an old HP OfficeJet all in one
Fax/Scanner/Printer for the task. I figured that way I could drop a dozen
pages on it at a time. I don't have a sheet feeder for any of my flatbed
scanners.
Would something like this work for the task? Or am I better off locating
a cheap used sheet feeder for a flat bed scanner.
In the long run I figure I will save to PDF... but with how cheap CDs
are, I will most likely keep the interm scanned image as well, and just
make the PDF more for easy quick access to the pages.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I have an original Compaq portable, that I had hoped to some day gut out and put in a "modern" motherboard etc, with an updated screen, but now it appears as if it may actually be of worth to someone as is. I even have the original receipt from Sears Business Center, where I bought it. Got an IBM proprinter also at the time, but that is now long gone.
Anyway, is there some way to find out what the value of my Compaq is?
Thanks to all who reply.
John Clarke
Philadelphia, PA
I got a mail from a person in Houston who has an 11/44 they needed to get
rid of... but their u-haul truck fell through, and they had to haul it
up here to Austin in batches, in their car.
Tonight I got the first part of the batch - which ended up being a pair of
RL02 drives, and a MINC-11!
pictures: http://www.pdp11.org/minc/
Anybody need the RL02s? Right now, I'm concentrating mostly on getting
all this documentation organized and scanned (finally!) and just messing
around with smaller systems. So, I dont have space for the RL02s, although
I'll be using that enclosure to rackmount some other equipment. Next week
(hopefully), he'll be bringing up the 11/44 if weather and time permits.
Therefore, two free RL02s. Must be picked up in Austin, Texas.
I *might* have a disk pack for one of them around somewhere as well;
need to dig.
Megan Gentry - please email me your postal address again; I have a huge
box of print sets and paper tapes to send your way.
Email me if interested..
Bill
--
bill bradford
mrbill(a)mrbill.net
austin, texas
I was digging in the basement, and found a few things I forgot I had. I think some on the list may be interested in copies of some of this stuff, if so, let me know off list.
A lot of Pick Assembler documentation from my days working on the Pick O/S: The original "rainbow" microdata reality assembler manual, the ultimate pick assembler manual, the general automation pick assembler manual, and the alpha microsystems pick "open architecture" assembler manual. Some of the stuff in this box was "confidential - internal only" and not for public release. I doubt they care these days.
Various info on the M4 Data autoloading 1/2 tape drive: The M4 Data 9900 series tape drive field service manual (very thick, includes schematics), the M4 Data Diagnostics manual for 8900, 9800, and 9903 streaming tape drives (this is really 5 pages of quick reference lists for the diagnostics on the drive). Then there is a 3 page chart showing the jumper settings for the optional SCSI interface card (this drive was most often pertec, not scsi). I seem to recall someone asking about this on the list a while back. I was sure I had accidentally pitched this info - so I was quite happy to find it, since I have a mint M4 in the basement :)
Jay West