I do indeed remember those manuals - those sturdy binders which let you know
these systems meant business. There were never enough of the binders
available in the IBM PC dealership I worked in. And lest we forget: the
infamous "This page intentionally left blank" page. What's up with that??
I do also memember Wordstar and it's arcane command sequences. Those
commands persisted though, through a number of ordinary text editors for
programmers & such.
Speaking of infantile and utterly bizarre, does anyone remember that abysmal
IBM attempt at a word processor, the name of which escapes me at the moment.
I think it was vaguely based on their mainframe product, typical of IBM at
the time. It's command set was last seen wandering about in their "e"
editor in PC DOS 6.xx. It's an amazingly powerful editor in a lot of ways,
loads of options and features if you can figure them out. But I'll be
danged if I can get the thing to insert a new line...
Cheers,
Dennis
On Jan 19, 11:12, Jules Richardson wrote:
> > Well, someone else has offered to copy Disc 1 for me. I've also found
a
> > few other people who have ARM Evaluation Systems, so once I get a good
Disc
> > 1, I'll put the set of six on my website (and if anyone from any of the
> > Beeb sites wants to make a copy, that's fine by me). Any suggestions
as to
> > format to use for the images?
>
> I expect you know far more about this than I do! "Pete's own undocumented
image
> format" is probably not a good idea :-)
No, probably not :-) The trick with Acorn files is preserving the load
and execute addresses. A spark archive will do that, but as far as I know,
there's no spark dearchiver for a Beeb. It would be easy on an Archimedes
or a RISC PC, but not everyone will have one of those -- and even if they
did, they might not have a way to attach a 5.25" drive to it.
I'm open to suggestions...
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>Message: 28
>Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:13:38 -0600
>From: Jeffrey Sharp <jss(a)subatomix.com>
>To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
>Subject: Re: ADMIN: What if ClassicCmp were a blog?
>Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>
>
>> You can't attach eMails to the list can you?
>
>Yes. If a message is accepted for deliver, it is delivered with only the
>standard Mailman header modifications. No other filtering takes place. Of
>course, we could do this now by piping messages through a filter before they
>hit the Mailman posting script. Easy.
>
I am reading the list in digest-format. HTML and attachments are anoying in
that list-format, therefore I would very much apreaciate a filter for
HTML-parts of multi-part mails and attachments to be applied to a message
before it is added to the digest.
>What if ClassicCmp were a blog?
If I had to choose between Web-access and mail-access, I would take the mail
variant, as it is now. I like it.
Thank you for providing the list!
Frank Arnold
I gave up (for the moment) trying to find the problem with the
memory on my 8/L. It never returns anything but all-0's to the MB,
but all the control pulses and timing are correct. To make matters
worse, while scoping the output of the bit 5 sense amp I
discovered it would change every time when I changed bit 0 of the
switch register and hit DEP!
Meanwhile I decided to go after another problem (when you hit
START at 0000 it runs up to 0100 and "hangs" with the BREAK and
RUN lights on.) If it's executing 0000's (AND instructions) it
should just keep running. The only way to wake it back up is to
flip the SING STEP switch (which is NOT how it's supposed to work;
LOAD, EXAM, etc. should also clear the RUN flip flop). And nothing
was requesting a data break, either! So after some scoping and
extender card work, I found the backplane wire from the BRK SYNC
flip flop was broken in two. This made for a continuous break
request. I fixed it, now it starts and stops like it's supposed
to,...
And then I looked closely at the backplane and saw three more
broken wires! All of them are crossing the gap between the AB row
of sockets and the CD row. Guess 33 years of flexing and vibration
did them in. They are buried too deep to be mouse bites (besides,
the nest was in the back on the module side).
Unfortunately I ran out of wirewrap wire and the wife rang the
dinner bell. We'll see what ELSE is screwed up next week!
-Charles
First thing a discussion copyright probably does belong on this list
since people are discussing making copies of manuals, scematics, eproms,
paper tapes, etc to preserve and keep old systems running and all these
fall under copyright and reproducing them is a infringe of copyright
without the author's consent even if it is done for non-commercial
purposes under current US law.
... now my rant ...
Companies generally are not interested in maintaining their old
copyrights and preserving them, in the vast majority of cases old works
are is only maintained by dedicated people like hobbyists, scholars or
librarians. This is why "hard copyrights" like we have with the DMCA
with encryption and digital restrictions entering firmware and severe
criminal or civil penalties for *any* violation, without the character
of the infringement even being considered.
This is very wrong.
Before 1973 the owners of a copyright had to actively acquire it by
first claiming copyright on the work and second by registering their
copyright to keep it active after the initial 28 years. Before the "No
Electronic Theft Act" in 1996(7?) it was not considered infringement to
reproduce works as long as the work was not being actively maintained
i.e. publicly available and the reproduction was not done for profit.
So if I had a copy of a manual or schematic for an old piece of
equipment I was free to make a copy and give it to you as long as I did
not profit directly from the act.
There is no logical reason that many technically infringing uses of
abandoned copyrights should be perfectly legal as long as it is not for
profit. If your argument to refute this is that the author has a right
control of the work, I would say that this right is not absolute since
it is legal for me to make a dub of a CD for my car, to sing happy
birthday (still copyrighted) at a birthday party in my home, and to
record TV off the air without having to pay royalties to anyone. I see
it as once an author makes a works publicly available, additional
non-commercial uses should fall into fair use if the author does not
continue making the work available to the public to prevent useful works
>from disappearing.
My point is that anybody trying to maintain/restore an old piece of
equipment is almost certainly violating copyrights if they have had to
rely on information reproduced by anybody other than the copyright
holder. Thus under US law, as it stands, you are as guilty as anybody
who has use NAPSTER, KAZA, etc to download music, and if you want to
continue your hobby you should write your representative to get the laws
changed to put some reasonable exclusions to infringement.
::sigh::
OK, I have that off my chest for now.
Regards,
Paul
----------------Original Message------------------
From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
Subject: Wanted : Pinouts for 9311, 93L14, 8273 chips
To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 23:31:33 +0000 (GMT)
Reply-To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
I'm fixing some old HP computer hardware (a 9830 computer and its 9866
thermal printer), and I've come up against a few ICs I don't have pinouts
for :-(.
If anyone has them, could they fill in the tables below :
Fairchild 9311 (4 bit -> 16 line decoder?)
1 : O/
2 : 1/
3 : 2/
4 : 3/
5 : 4/
6 : 5/
7 : 6/
8 : 7/
9 : 8/
10 : 9/
11 :10/
12 : Gnd
13 : 11/
14 : 12/
15 : 13/
16 : 14/
17 : 15/
18 : E0/
19 : E1/
20 : A3
21 : A2
22 : A1
23 : A0
24 : Vcc
Fairchild 93L14 (latch?)
1 : ENABLE/
2 : SET 0/
3 : D0
4 : D1
5 : SET 2/
6 : D2
7 : D3
8 : Gnd
9 : MASTER RESET/
10 : Q3
11 : SET 3/
12 : Q2
13 : Q1
14 : SET 1/
15 : Q0
16 : Vcc
Signetics 8273 (10 bit serial-in, parallel out shift register)
1 : Q6
2 : Q7
3 : Q8
4 : Q9
5 : Q10
6 : Clk/ 1
7 : Clk 2
8 : Gnd
9 : Clr/
10 : Serial In
11 : Q1
12 : Q2
13 : Q3
14 : Q4
15 : Q5
16 : Vcc
Note: The unused Clock performs the INHIBIT function.
---------------------------------------------
Thanks in advance for any help
-tony
---------------------------------------------
You are MOST welcome; delighted to have an opportunity
to repay you for the many times you've helped us.
Let me know if you need detailed tech data; I have the Fairchild
Data and Application Books and the Signetics Data Book.
I even have a fair bit of 9300 ICs, but alas, no 9311s and
only the regular power 9314. Probably no 8273s but I can
have a look.
Good luck & thanks again for all YOUR help!
mike
>A: Yes.
>B: Google is your friend.
Oh look at that... tons of hits.
Gee, I figured it might be the kind of thing that Apple would have
protected... maybe it was the thread on copyrights just soured me into
forgetting that not everything in this world is locked away in a vault.
>It's *extremely* difficult to find some of the Apple I parts, which have
>been out of production for over years. Particularly the seven 1024-bit
>MOS shift registers, and one hex-40-bit MOS shift register.
Bummer! Maybe Tony will chime in with a list of readily available, drop
it alternatives... or the plans to make replacements using common
household cleaning products :-)
>Not quite, since they had a PCB. (Unless you plan to lay out a PCB
>yourself.)
I really hadn't thought that far in advance.... I was honestly under the
wrong impression that the Apple 1 plans would be hard to come by.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
I'm wondering if anyone has documentation on my 68010-based MVME-110-1 CPU
boards. Google doesn't help much. Is there a standard debugger that
(should) be in its ROMs? Does anyone have an image available? I think
that these boards might have a custom ROM image on them, but I'm not sure.
Thanks for any help,
Pat
--
Purdue Universtiy ITAP/RCS
Information Technology at Purdue
Research Computing and Storage
http://www-rcd.cc.purdue.edu
From: Jim Arnott <jrasite(a)eoni.com>
Date: 01/18/2003 9:11 PM
> From an admitedly small sample. The local schools grab every obsolete
> Mac I offer them. Everything from SEs to early nubus PPCs. The
> instructors love them. They also say, "Windows don't do music
> composition." What Windows programs score from MIDI?
Check Digital Orchestrator Pro, downloadable from www.voyetra.com for $69.95.
Low cost, gigantic number of features, and the interface is much simpler to
use than Cakewalk.
Later --
Glen
0/0
>
> Jim
>
> J.C.Wren wrote:
> > Say WHAT? There are dozens of music programs for the PC, and some are good
> > enough for studio production work (like Cakewalk and Pro Tools). Where'd
> > you ever get that idea?
> >
>
>Interestingly, the "Bill Gates Open Letter to Hobbyists", that is often
>cited as being the origin of the word "piracy" being applied to software,
>turns out to NOT use the word "piracy". It always helps to check
>citations before relying on them. Someday, I'll learn to do so.
I just read the letter... first time I ever have.
I found two things that make me go hummmm:
1: MS Software is probably one of the highest pirated groups of software
out there (no figures to back this up, its a wild assumption based on the
fact that I know lots and lots of people that have various versions of
Windows and/or MS Office, and haven't paid for all the copies they are
running. Compounded by the vast market share, it seems that there is a
good chance they rank at or near the #1 spot). Yet despite this, Mr.
Gates seems to have done pretty well for himself. Actually, I have often
wondered, if MS Software didn't get pirated, and every copy that every
company and person ran was a fully paid for copy, would MS have the
market share they have today.
So it seems to me at least that MS has had a piracy problem from the get
go... and it didn't really hurt them in the least.
2: His parting line in the letter:
"Nothing would please me more than being able to hire ten programmers
and deluge the hobby market with good software ".
I just have to laugh when I read that. Well, he got the deluge part
right. :-)
(Disclaimer: Yes, that is a clear MS bash statement, but it is tongue in
cheek... yes, I personally don't care for MS software over many of the
alternatives... but in the long run, most of their stuff really isn't
THAT bad... its just fun to say it is).
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
>Oh, and FYI, no
>matter what Apple says, if you can track down 8 4meg 32 pin simms
>(remember those?) your se30 will happily address 32 megs of RAM.
Apple never denied that the SE/30 would address 32 meg of RAM. Its part
of the spec.
What they denied was that it can address 128 megs of RAM (8 16meg 30 pin
chips). That has been reported by many to work just fine.
-chris
<http://www.mythtech.net>
Ok folks, I'm officially desperate. I can't figure out what is wrong with
the 2100 IOP cpu memory section on my 2000/Access system. So, just thought
I'd post this to the list....forgive my begging, it isn't pretty *Grin*
Anyone have a working HP 2100 cpu available? I will pay real $$$ at this
point, or trade probably just about anything I have for one. If anyone has
one they will sell, or trade for, or give away to a place (me) that will
actually use it and not throw it on a shelf, I would like to know. I'd also
welcome any leads as to where one might be stored, etc. Or, as an
alternative, if anyone has a magical device that will instantly transfer all
of Tony Duell's repair knowledge and ability to my brain, that might work ;)
FYI - I need either a 2100A or 2100S cpu. Don't need or want any 21MX or
1000 type cpus.
Thanks!
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
Ethan: thanks for the info; I've never seen a
dynamic RAM 2001N, although a friend of mine
home-brewed a static > dynamic conversion.
4032s of course, but I take it you're talking
about a real small-B/W-screen 2001.
I sometimes toy with the idea of building
a PET using modern chips; shouldn't be too
big a deal (very low on my to-do list though).
Adrian: Was working on adding my .02 to the
discussion, but read on and saw that you're
in business. If you can't find any locally,
I've got several tubes of 2114s here in frosty
Canada. And they are used in pairs because
they're only 4 bits wide (x 1K).
One of my PETs, with an MTU graphics board,
is dead as well; this discussion just might
motivate me to have a look at it.
Good luck!
mike
I have a 13 year old apple macintosh that works like a dream. It's loaded with programs, and this great little machine got me through law school and helped me launch my career. When my employer switched over to a compaq system, I could no longer use this machine to work on projects at home and was forced to pick up an etower package instead. For the last 5 years, it's sat in my basement waiting. Everything works perfectly, including the printer, and all of the parts are original. Any tips on where I might take this machine so that it can be used? It's a shame to let it sit here and rot.
Ken Donchatz
kendonchatz(a)yahoo.com
Columbus, Ohio
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
On Jan 18, 13:07, David Holland wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 23:19, Brian Chase wrote:
> > I'll wait to get an Onyx. Actually, the Origin 2000s are quite lovely,
> > too. They're still really off topic for this list.
> Wot about SGI Crimson's? (Or in my case, a Power Series frame, w/
> Crimson boards in it) Or are they too new (and LARGE :-) ) for the
> list?
I think Brian may have meant Onyx2, which is basically an Origin2000 with a
shedload (or at least half a rack's worth) of graphics engine. Crimsons
and Power Series are certainly on-topic here.
> (The optical mouse I have for it is in too bad a shape to be really
> usable anymore - the felts shot, and it sticks to the metal plate/mouse
> pad too much for my tastes.)
Why can't you clean it, and replace the felt?
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Mike,
Thank you! This is incredible. I can't believe you wrote an AM100
emulator, and not only that, HOW FAST you've done it. It works great,
too! This is just fabulous. I cannot believe my eyes. I can't wait
for the 1.0 release! Is this a pure hobby for you? I am a 16 year
coder, and i gotta say, i am 100% humbled by your work. This is just
amazing. I am a huge AM fan and OASYS (old theos) for Z80 fan. I have
Theos, but i sold my old am100 w/ 2 cdc hawks years ago (and believe me
- i am pissed beyond reproach that i did that!!! )
Nice work, mike!
Kirk Barrett
PPT
<mailto:kirk@pptnet.c>
I'm testing the code I've written to spamproof the ClassicCmp web site and
archives. I call the system SpamCamo. The file filter works great and
produces links as it should. The CGI program is not behaving and is giving
me some *very* wierd behavior. I'm stumped.
First, if I compile with this:
$ cc -o spamcamo.cgi cgi.c spamcamo.cgi.c -lcipher
I get a "Bus error (core dumped)" exception from the first statement in my
program, which is printf("DEBUG: 0\n"). I have used gdb to verify this, and
it tells me that SIGBUS is occuring inside isatty() in libc.
Now, if I compile like this, switching the order of the source files but
making NO changes to the source files themselves:
$ cc -o spamcamo.cgi spamcamo.cgi.c cgi.c -lcipher
The program proceeds to the first call of strdup(), which returns NULL and
sets errno to EINVAL. strdup() is definitely receiving a valid string.
Furthermore, malloc(1) (as in "allocate one byte") in the same place also
fails with EINVAL. The machine is not low on memory. Even furthermore, the
code that is failing in this case (in cgi.c) works correctly when compiled
against a test program (proof: http://www.subatomix.com/test_cgi.cgi?a=b)
instead of spamcamo.cgi.c. This is what the program does (i.e. not much)
before calling strdup():
printf()
function call
function call
getenv()
return
strcmp()
funcion call
getenv()
return
strdup() <--- SIGBUS occurs here
I get the same results on two FreeBSD boxen. One is running 4.5-RELEASE and
the other is running 4.6-STABLE. I'd like to think this is something I've
done wrong and not a bug in libc. Any ideas?
--
Jeffrey Sharp
i do have a multia ... what needs to be done?
--f
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antonio Carlini [mailto:arcarlini@iee.org]
> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 1:33 PM
> To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org
> Subject: RE: VMS command question and help, off-topic
>
>
> > Antonio Carlini (arcarlini(a)iee.org) wrote :
> >
> > > Can you zip it up so it's easier to download?
> >
> > didn't help very much,
> http://www.kotelna.sk/freddy/multia_v72.bck.gz
> > (913652 bytes), along with the original
> > http://www.kotelna.sk/freddy/multia_v72.bck > are there.
>
> I didn't mean to make it smaller - I just didn't
> want it to download as a text file. ZIP files
> download correctly, other random stuff depends
> on the server settings (IIRC).
>
> Anyway, I managed to get it using a download
> manager and I've managed to restore it to
> a floppy. I don't have a Multia so I won't
> be able to test it. I can either dig out
> rawread or try using dd on my Solaris
> box - just let me know which you would
> find easiest to deal with (and the exact dd
> command you would prefer, if that matters).
>
> I can email the result or ftp it to you
> if you have a server.
>
> Antonio
>
> --
>
> ---------------
> Antonio Carlini arcarlini(a)iee.org
>
>
Anyone ever seen someone out there trying to get rid of a Yamaha CX5M? It's
about the only MSX machine I have significant curiosity about due to its
specialised music abilities.
--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser(a)stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- I used to miss my ex-girlfriend, but then my aim improved. -----------------
Pete,
> Well, someone else has offered to copy Disc 1 for me. I've also found a
> few other people who have ARM Evaluation Systems, so once I get a good Disc
> 1, I'll put the set of six on my website (and if anyone from any of the
> Beeb sites wants to make a copy, that's fine by me). Any suggestions as to
> format to use for the images?
I expect you know far more about this than I do! "Pete's own undocumented image
format" is probably not a good idea :-)
Other than that anything that has some supporting documentation available would
seem sensible - it'll always be possible to convert between formats then.
I get lost trying to remember all the issues regarding writing to discs in
different machines (wish there was a website that collected all that
information together, for various platforms) - I can't for the life of me
remember if it's possible to write to beeb discs with a PC, which would
probably be my preferred option. My BBC Master can emulate an XT so maybe
there's something on that side that can take a PC format 5.25 disc and write
out to a beeb disc. I have no idea...
I'm more concerned about the disc set being archived somewhere than delving in
and playing around with my ARM unit now though - same goes for other systems.
I've already got machines that are non-runners at present because the software
has gone and is unobtainable :-(
> so 50 or 100 seem likely
> numbers for the quantity of ARM Development Kits made to fit Beebs.
hmm, mine was pretty late then if they did only make 50. Mine came from Kent
uni; I have no idea what it was doing there, but the same place sourced quite a
few bits of beeb equipment. Maybe they did some official product testing or
something.
cheers
Jules
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Thanks muchly, Jeffrey!
The problem was that the archive list on the main page only goes up to Nov. 2001,
but these URLs did the trick.
m
-----------------Original Message-----------------
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:08:32 -0600
From: Jeffrey Sharp <jss(a)subatomix.com>
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, M H Stein wrote:
> with the previous system I could retrieve the missed messages, but am
> apparently too dense to figure out how with the present system. Help?
http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctalk/http://www.classiccmp.org/pipermail/cctech/
--
Jeffrey Sharp
---------------------Original Message-------------------------
From: "Tim Myers" <tim.myers(a)sunplan.com>
To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: PerSci Model 277 Dual 8" Floppy Drives - Info Needed
Does anyone have any info on these drives? I have some in a CP/M system
(Ithaca Intersystems DPS-1), and they seem completely dead. They have an
electric load mechanism, but when I insert a disk, nothing happens.
Popped the case and can't see anything obviously out of place.
Tim.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cromemco used these in early models of the System 3; not exactly the most
reliable. Sorry to say, I scrapped several of them a year ago and, although I've
got manuals for most Cromemco stuff I don't think I've got any docs on these.
But I'll have a look and let you know if I find anything. Meanwhile, there are
probably several people on this list who have them and could perhaps at
least compare notes with ya. They are getting power?
Good luck,
mike
I *can't* believe I'm actually doing this.....I'm in a situation wherein I
need the MB, if you still have it.
How's it outfitted? uP and memory, is what I'm thinking of; and does it have
the standard 8-expansion slot count?
If you still have it, please do let me know, and I'll get back with you
quickly. Unfortunately, time is pushing me in this situation.
Also, if you *happen* to have a CGA video adapter with at least RGB DB-9
output, composite out (RCA) would be cool, but not necessary. I'd like to
get ahold of it at the same time.
--
Allan Gabston-Howell
"Be wary of any school of thought whose very name is an oxymoron.
They're telling you up front that they intend to travel on square wheels."