test-drb

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

101090 discussions

by bqt＠update.uu.se

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 Frank Arnold <fm.arnold(a)gmx.net> wrote: > cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 25.02.2003: > >From: <chu(a)verizon.net> > >To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> > >Subject: Help with my PDP 11/73 > >Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:36:31 -0800 > > > >I have gotten my PDP 11/73 to > >start up and go through an initialization > >script for RSX-11Mplus. However, I do not > >know any uids/passwords, so I cannot > >login; I can only watch the script go by. > >I am able, while the script is running, to break > >into MCR and run commands like PDP and DMP. > >I am able to dump in octal > >some of the files like [0,0]001054.DIR;1. > >Does anyone know where the user names/passwords > >are stored? My memory says that the maybe > >they are not encrypted? Is that so? > > The passwords are stored in a file [0,0]RSX11M.sys if I recall it correctley. > Should be a rather small file, just pip it to the printer to see it, it should > be an ASCII-file. > I think that after version 3.2 of rsx11m passwords were encripted, before that, > in plain text. Copy this file to some other media and delete it from your > system disk, After a new cold start you should have an open system. with RUN > $ACNT you can create new user-accounts if you desire. This should probably be in an FAQ for RSX. 1. The passwords along with all account information is stored in LB:[0,0]RSX11.SYS 2. The file is not an ASCII file. 3. Passwords in RSX11M are not encrypted, while passwords in RSX11M+ are. 4. (and this is the important one) to break into an RSX system: When the system boots, abort the startup script. (If it asks for the time, press ^Z, if it just runs ahead, press ^C and type ABO AT. (the period is *not* optional)). Run $ACNT, which is the account managing program. Change password for a system account (anything with a group number <= 10) Reboot, and then log in. A small explanation: When the system boots, the console terminal is privileged. The startup script normally finished by logging out the console. If you stop it before that, you'll remain logged in at a privileged terminal. This can be regarded as a security problem. Normally it wasn't, since people are not supposed to have access to the console terminal of a computer. It's locked away inside the computer hall. If you want to, you can protect yourself against this exploit, but noone does. Johnny Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt(a)update.uu.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

23 years, 1 month

Floppy drive for Zenith 100

by acme＠ao.net

Lawrence -- Most likely the manual you have is for the Xerox 16/8. Later -- Glen 0/0 > Basicly it was the CP/M system ported to the Intel > CPU. Along with the Zenith, the DEC Rainbow used it > (and CP/M-80, CCP/M, MSDOS). TMK both had dual > x80 and x86 processors. I also have a binder put out by > Xerox which has Digital Researches original manual > CP/M-86 Programmers Guide, so possibly Xerox had a > machine that used it. It's dated 3rd edition, January 1983 > I believe the OS is still available out there, possibly on > Tim Olmsteads old site now run by Gene Buckle. > > Lawrence > > > On 25 Feb 2003, , Tillman, Edward wrote: > > > Hmm... Would anyone be willing/able to explain the CP/M-86 > > OS to me -- either on or off the list? I'm still new enough > > that DOS was my world until Windoze came along... > > > > Cheers > > > > Ed > > San Antonio, Tx, USA

23 years, 1 month

Check out this TI99/4 on eBay

by acme＠ao.net

From: TeoZ <teoz(a)neo.rr.com> Date: 02/25/2003 11:18 PM > Its funny to me how a computer with a crappy keyboard like that model is > worth so much more then the better later version with a proper keyboard. The > computers I collect actually get used so if I ever wanted a Ti it would be > the one with the nicer keyboard. My first computer was a timex 2068 and > learning to program on chicklet keyboards sucks. Yeah, well, for those of us who started with a ZX81/TS1000, the TS2068 keyboard was a big step up :>) Later -- Glen 0/0

23 years, 1 month

SCSI cards

by Robert_Feldman＠jdedwards.com

IBM PC-DOS 3.30 could support 4 partitions, one Primary and 3 Extended. The primary partition is limited to 32MB. Extended partitions can be divided into a number of logical drives, each limited to 32MB. What limits the number of ligical drives (beyond the disk capacity) is the availability of drive letters: the primary partition is assigned to Drive C: (unless you have more than two floppy drives), and the logical drives get letters from D: through Z:. By my calculations, with all 24 hard drive letters assigned, the limit is 768MB. -----Original Message----- From: Ethan Dicks [mailto:erd_6502@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:39 AM To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org Subject: Re: SCSI cards --- Geoff Reed <geoffr(a)zipcon.net> wrote: > I'm pretty sure that msdos 3.11 supported multiple partitions :) It does. I have a PS/2 Model 30 (ISA) with a 50MB RLL drive replacing the original IBM IDE-ish drive. Two partitions under MS-DOS 3.11, one 30MB, one 20MB. The problem is that there is a small number of partitions possible (I don't recall if FDISK works the same way under 3.x as it did later), certainly no more than 4 primary partitions. DOS 4.x came out (as bad as it was) before 200MB drives were common. By the time "everybody" was buying "larger" drives, DOS 5.0 was out, solving several problems with historical baggage. > also if I had a SCSI controller in the beastie I'd probably go on the > quest for rainbow Venix :) Hmm... I would expect you'd need a Venix driver for it. If you _really_ wanted a challenge, you could port Minix to the Rainbow. Sources are available. Writing a Minix driver for the FDC might be interesting (not sure how much suitable documentation exists). -ethan

23 years, 1 month

RSX11M passwords, (was: Help with my PDP 11/73)

by fm.arnold＠gmx.net

cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 25.02.2003: >From: <chu(a)verizon.net> >To: <cctalk(a)classiccmp.org> >Subject: Help with my PDP 11/73 >Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:36:31 -0800 > >I have gotten my PDP 11/73 to >start up and go through an initialization >script for RSX-11Mplus. However, I do not >know any uids/passwords, so I cannot >login; I can only watch the script go by. >I am able, while the script is running, to break >into MCR and run commands like PDP and DMP. >I am able to dump in octal >some of the files like [0,0]001054.DIR;1. >Does anyone know where the user names/passwords >are stored? My memory says that the maybe >they are not encrypted? Is that so? > The passwords are stored in a file [0,0]RSX11M.sys if I recall it correctley. Should be a rather small file, just pip it to the printer to see it, it should be an ASCII-file. I think that after version 3.2 of rsx11m passwords were encripted, before that, in plain text. Copy this file to some other media and delete it from your system disk, After a new cold start you should have an open system. with RUN $ACNT you can create new user-accounts if you desire. Frank

23 years, 1 month

Floppy drive for Zenith 100

by Edward.Tillman＠valero.com

Hmm... Would anyone be willing/able to explain the CP/M-86 OS to me -- either on or off the list? I'm still new enough that DOS was my world until Windoze came along... Cheers Ed San Antonio, Tx, USA > -----Original Message----- > From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of acme(a)ao.net > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 4:13 PM > To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org > Subject: Re: Floppy drive for Zenith 100 > > From: Vintage Computer Festival <vcf(a)siconic.com> > Date: 02/20/2003 7:58 PM > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 acme(a)ao.net wrote: > > > > > > OR you can get a copy of MS-DOS 4.00 and patch it to run on the > Z-100. > > > > > > Jeez, Joe, now I'm really gagging. MS-DOS on a Z-100? Yuck. > > > > The Z-100 was intended as a dual OS machine. You had the best > > (presumably) of both worlds: CP/M and MS-DOS. > > Sure -- that's how I set mine up, but to me, running MS-DOS on it makes it > too > much like a run-of-the-mill PC, whereas running CP/M-86 gives it more of a > "vintage" flavor. Make sense? (I'm not feeling very articulate today) > > Later -- > > Glen > 0/0 [demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]

23 years, 1 month

Lambda Compudialer?

by rigdonj＠cfl.rr.com

Anyody know anything about a Lambda Compudialer 729? It looks kind of like a desktop calculator but it's actually a phone dialer. It's not the automatic dialer advertised by those telephone SCAMMERS Compudial. This dates from 1979. Joe

23 years, 1 month

Floppy drive for Zenith 100

by Edward.Tillman＠valero.com

I Don't know that it is, or at least don't know if the system will acknowledge its full capacity. CPUs and RAM were pretty small then, and the BIOS didn't like being pushed for more than 320k. Before asking if the system can handle it, you might wanna look into the BIOS, and see if *it* can handle it. Cheers... Ed San Antonio, Tx, USA > -----Original Message----- > From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of "Hurd, > Kenneth Steven CIV" <kenneth.hurd(a)navy.mil> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 8:58 AM > To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org > Subject: Floppy drive for Zenith 100 > > Hello, > > Do you know if it is possible to install a 1.44MB floppy drive in a > Zenith > 100? > > Thank you. > > Ken. [demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]

23 years, 1 month

SCSI cards

by healyzh＠aracnet.com

> >I just wish I could find the SCSI controller that a German company made > >for the DEC Rainbow. it'd be nice to pull the 20 meg HD out and drop a > >500 meg SCSI in it's place :) > > Wow! Is this documented? That *does* sound cool. Though I'm not sure just > how long it'd take to defragment... :-) > How did it work with the OS's, which were limited to disk sizes nothing > like 500 Meg? > - Mark That's a valid question, how big of an drive will the OS's on a Rainbow support? I'm guessing you might be limited to 30MB, even if you've a bigger drive in the system. IIRC, CP/M and old versions of DOS only support up to 30MB. Zane

23 years, 1 month

STOP! (RE: Let the witch trials begin! Re: OT: Re: Going OT R e: (no subject))

by Edward.Tillman＠valero.com

Concur. > Guys. Stop. Topic. Nuf said. [demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]

23 years, 1 month

Help ID this board...

by petrock00＠hotmail.com

Hey, I was wondering if someone could help me ID this card. I found this board in an old Macintosh IIx at a swap meet... When I opened up the case I saw this big (about 12 inches long and 4 inches wide) BLUE board plugged into one of the NuBus slots. It has two large chips on it with the markings Xilinx XC2018-70 PC84C. There is only one port on the card that looks like a 9 pin VGA or serial port. It has a hand written serial number (1570156), and a part number of 10008 Rev#2. There is only one sticker on the card that says "1990 LTI; All Rights Reserved; Ver DPDII 52290H" Does anyone have a clue? Since the board is blue, I figured that its probably a prototype of something, maybe a video card?? Thanks in advance... --Rob

23 years, 1 month

Help ID this board...

by julesrichardsonuk＠yahoo.co.uk

> I was wondering if someone could help me ID this card. I found this board > in an old Macintosh IIx at a swap meet... > Does anyone have a clue? Since the board is blue, I figured that its > probably a prototype of something, maybe a video card?? Thanks in > advance... if it isn't video, possibly a token ring card? I'm sure somebody made them... cheers, Jules Everything you'll ever need on one web page >from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com

23 years, 1 month

QBUS SCSI card...

by mail.list＠analog-and-digital-solutions.com

Hi Gene, > That's just amazing. I never knew the demand for those things was that > high. I wish the guy that was doing the IDE controllers had entered > production. :) I think a lot of people, "personal users" too, are getting tired of struggling with RD-5x drive unreliability, and/or want the larger storage capacities they could obtain with SCSI Best Regards At 11:00 PM 2/23/03 -0800, you wrote: > > I took a look at the CTP dealer listing index, and the current listed > prices > > for UC08's run from a low of $300 to a high of $750 Out of the 12 listed > > that have prices showing, the average is $511.25 > > > > There was a UC07 recently on eBay in the UK that sold for GBP 252.00 > > (currently approx. US $397.91 ) > > > > EMULEX UCO7 Q-BUS SCSI CONTROLLER FOR DEC > > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=2307510324 > > > >That's just amazing. I never knew the demand for those things was that >high. I wish the guy that was doing the IDE controllers had entered >production. :) > >g.

23 years, 1 month

Final page for John Willis...

by msspc＠rev.net

John, my repeated attempts to get some type of resolution for that CDROM you received in November have met with no response to date from you. Please contact me by March 10th. I'm looking for payment of the agreed-on fees or the return of the CDROM drive. Thank you, Frank Helvey -- ==== M O N T V A L E S O F T W A R E S E R V I C E S P. C. ==== Clayton Frank Helvey President Montvale Software Services, P. C. P.O. Box 840 Blue Ridge, VA 24064-0840 United States of America Phone 540.947.5364 ===================================================================

23 years, 1 month

Care and Feeding of Trolls

by alhartman＠yahoo.com

To Marvin and Mail List... You both make correct deductions... I like this list, and have a lot more fun conversing about Model I TRS-80's and Tandon Floppy Drives than wasting time trying to answer drivel, point by point. And I want to remain welcome on this interesting list. So, the troll can say or do whatever he likes. Being a troll, I can now ascribe any posts from under the bridge to it's proper value. There's been some news on the Amiga Emulation front. It seems that on http://www.umilator.com , Bernd Meyer may relent on his decision never to release Umilator (A 68k Amiga Emulator that runs on a Linux Kernal using some technology Bernd created for UAE-JIT, and some new stuff... Supposedly the fastest and most compatible emulator ever written.). He requires a certain number of people to commit to buying it, as there will be some legal battles with the people who claim to own Amithlon, which is a similar project that Bernd wrote code for. It seems that one person has decided he is the founder and creator of the software (but only contributed some minor code that by all reports is buggy and feature incomplete), and the distributor also claims to own the software as well. So far, nobody has been able to substantiate either paries claims, and Bernie will have to defend his right to market a product that shares little common code (some of the code is GPL, so Bernie is free and clear to use it. And unlike the other parties, Bernie has a legal licence from Amiga to include their IP in his product.), doesn't use the same name, and has significant rewritten code and new features. But intimidation and threats by these parties have kept Bernie from releasing it, as he doesn't have the financial depth to defend a suit in Germany from Australia. Nor, the desire to be put through all the stress of a suit. I guess, he's changed his mind about the stress. And decided that if the project could generate enough money, he'd defend his rights to market it on principle. So, if you want to see Bernie be rewarded for his excellent work, and people who want to keep his product from ever seeing the light of day get their due for their selfishness, go take a look and register in the poll for people willing to buy the product once available. Supposedly it's done and can be released. Bernie is just waiting for enough committed buyers so he can be sure he won't lose his shirt with the court costs when all the frivolous suits get filed. I posted that not only would I buy it, I'd also contribute to a legal defense fund. Sorry for the long message, hope this of more interest to the list than troll droppings.. Regards, Al Hartman (Macintosh Emulation List Host) http://www.topica.com/lists/MacEmuList My Homepage http://www.geocities.com/alhartman Enlightenment means taking full responsibility for your life. - William Blake

23 years, 1 month

Trivia Question

by zmerch＠30below.com

With my contemplation of purchasing a new Sony Picturebook, I was wondering: What was the first portable computer that weighed less than 1Kg? [[I'm assuming that it'd be older than 10 years, so it should be ontopic...]] Any pointers appreciated! :-) Thanks, Roger "Merch" Merchberger

23 years, 1 month

Floppy drive for Zenith 100

by Edward.Tillman＠valero.com

Hmm... Gagging? I ran DOS 2.x and 3.x in the USAF on everything from Z-100s to Z248s. A bit sloggy by current standards, but they ran... Cheers! Ed San Antonio, Tx, USA > -----Original Message----- > From: cctalk-admin@classiccmp.org@PEUSA On Behalf Of Joe > <rigdonj(a)cfl.rr.com> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 2:21 PM > To: cctalk(a)classiccmp.org > Subject: Re: Floppy drive for Zenith 100 > > At 04:49 PM 2/20/03 -0800, Sellam wrote: > >On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 acme(a)ao.net wrote: > > > >> > OR you can get a copy of MS-DOS 4.00 and patch it to run on the > Z-100. > >> > >> Jeez, Joe, now I'm really gagging. MS-DOS on a Z-100? Yuck. > > > >The Z-100 was intended as a dual OS machine. You had the best > >(presumably) of both worlds: CP/M and MS-DOS. > > You forgot to include CPM-86. > > Joe [demime 1.01a removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef]

23 years, 1 month

FYI: 25th Anniversary of Ward Christensen's BBS

by Robert_Feldman＠jdedwards.com

The following link is to the story in the February 16th Chicago Tribune. Not the most detailed story, but still some recognition of an important event in computer history. http://www.chicagotribune.com/templates/misc/printstory.jsp?slug=chi%2D03021 60428feb16&section=%2Ftechnology Bob

23 years, 1 month

Fujitsu MB15140 chips for 2351 Eagle Availiable

by Innfogra＠aol.com

In a message dated 2/24/03 3:36:36 PM Pacific Standard Time, ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk writes: > 'TTL Bipolar 500-gate Master Slice LSI' gate array, set up as the > HDA sequencer for the 2351 Eagle drive. According to the manual for that > drive, this chip handles the sequnce control of the spidle motor and the > generation of machine status information. > Thanks for the help Tony. These chips might have had some value when I got them (early 1990s) but I bet they are scrap now. I wonder how many Eagles 2351 and Super Eagles 2361s that are left working. If anyone is maintaining Fujitsu 2351 Eagles and needs some, please contact me off list at Innfosale(a)aol.com. I am intending to dispose of these soon. Paxton Astoria, OR

23 years, 1 month

Info wanted: IBM vacuum tube digital computer demonstrator

by rigdonj＠cfl.rr.com

I've posted some pictures of the IBM digital demo unit at <http://home.cfl.rr.com/rigdon14/ibm/>. Any info on using it would be appreciated. Also posted is the schematic of the TH-1, "one shot" using the 2D21 tube (SCR with a pilot light!). Joe

23 years, 1 month

More HX-20 questions

by chriss＠kingston.net

Hello, I picked up an HX-20 years ago, and have finally some time to play with it. I have a couple questions that perhaps one of you others out there with an HX-20 could answer. HX-20 Background: Cream Color, Cassette Module, NO 16K expansion, HP HEDS-3000 barcode reader, barcode ROM installed, labeled in Pen BARCODE Z. Everything seems to work fine. I am trying to get the BARCODE ROM loaded. I have read all the EPSON docs on their support site. Have not been able to locate a BASIC tutorial online though. Questions: 1) Should the installed ROM (NOT a module but inside the HX-20) show up automagically in the menu? 2) If not, how to I go about loading it into memory? 3) Thoughts on the easiest way to interface the HX-20 to a Win box or anyone tried a terminal program and a Palm? TIA ChriS

23 years, 1 month

Identifying a Motolora chip - MC14544?

by doug_jackson＠citadel.com.au

>> Wasn't that chip used in the Tandy TRS-80 Model 100 machines. >I thought the M100 uses the 14412 chip... Yep, You are right. >> >> I remember playing with the Band Pass filters to convince the >>TRS-80 to work >> with CCITT tones, instaed of the Bell tones that were used in >>USA. That was a while ago >IIRC, the 14412 didn't demodulate CCITT tones reliably at 300 baud. The >better-designed UK modems that used this chip at all used it for the >modulator only and used something like an XR2211 for the demodulator. Ahh, That explains why it was allways fussy about signal levels. The data sheet said that it could do it, and I had to alter the level of the BELL/CCITT pin. - doug CAUTION - The information in this message may be of a privileged or confidential nature intended only for the use of the addressee or someone authorised to receive the addressee's e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify postmaster(a)citadel.com.au. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of Citadel Securix. Feel free to visit the Citadel Securix website! Click below. http://www.citadel.com.au

23 years, 1 month

PDP-11/04 on Ebay - whats wrong with it?

by fm.arnold＠gmx.net

cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 25.02.2003: >Subject: PDP-11/04 on Ebay - whats wrong with it? >Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:27:37 +1100 >From: "Kane, David (DPRS)" <David.Kane(a)aph.gov.au> > >Hi, > > >A PDP-11/04 on ebay >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=1247&item=3403225 >748&rd=1 > >I have to start by stating I am in Australia. Our dollar might have >crept back up to a smidgen over 60 cents US today, but the opening bid >on the PDP will still be considerable, then add international shipping >and ooooooh ouch. But despite all that I am still toying with the idea >of bidding on the item. I do need a little assistance before making a >definitive decision. For those unaware the item was listed before >recently but was passed in unbid. I did not get interested last time >since the description did not list a CPU card, and the seller did not >reply to an enquiry regarding a CPU card. I notice that this time there >is a CPU card listed (M7263). My quandary is over the seller's comment >that the "Unit powers up and reads 0002777" although the pictures have >it reading 000277. My worry is that the unit is severely broken. Can any >take a stab at guessing what might be wrong, is it possibly just the >lack of a boot device (floppy of hard disk)? > > The lack of boot devices is certainly one reason, but I dont see any memory in that machine either. The seller advertises a Plessey PM1116, a 16 kw module, but it's not in the machine. If you compare the photos, you will see different board-configurations, so they are actively playing with what to take out and what to leave in.... :-(( This is a very bad sign in my eyes, as they say that they cannot test. If thats true, why do they swap the modules around ? Also the far-end unibus-terminator is missing, pointing to a canibalised backplane and/or expansionbox. Will you be able to find that terminator? Without that the machine will never run. Anyway aske a detailed list of all the included modules from the seller. Further this machine will weight some 50 - 60 kg. At the same weight and thus shipping cost you can get an 11/34. Thatone will be a lot more fun, as it will allow you a bigger selection of os's. The 11/04 is limited to 28 (31 with a trick) kwords of memory, has no memory management and will therefore never run the bigger PDP11 SW-packages. If I were to decide, I would leave thisone where it is now, too uncertain at the probably huge cost of shipping. You better stick to a system that hasn't been altered after its decommisioning. Its always better if you can talk to the people that were previousley using the maschine you get, although this happens seldom. Finalley, look at the selles feedback, (which is realley good) he's selling just about anything from anywhere. Don't expect any expertise on the item sold. Frank

23 years, 1 month

TU58 Emulation (was: M9312 Bootstrap Questions)

by fm.arnold＠gmx.net

cctech-request(a)classiccmp.org schrieb am 25.02.2003: >From: "Robert F. Schaefer" <rschaefe(a)gcfn.org> >Subject: Re: TU58 Emulation (was: M9312 Bootstrap Questions) >Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:02:56 -0500 > >> Frank Arnold wrote: >> > I hope you can boot anything else, do you have a DL11-W? You could use >> > this with a PeeCee emulated TU58 for diagnostics ect. >> >> Two questions. >> >>First, has anyone here emulated a TU58 successfully in software? I searched >>through the archives and found lots of posts that say "you could" and none >>that say "I did". If it's doable, what software should I use? There is a true SW-emulation at: http://www.not-compatible.org/PDP-11/programs/tu58sim.html Someone else has done another simulator as well, but don't remember it now >You might want to take a look at >http://www.sparetimegizmos.com/Hardware/TU58_Emulator.htm. Thats a nice HW-emulation, is much faster as the real tape... Frank

23 years, 1 month

Info wanted: IBM vacuum tube digital computer demonstrator

by rigdonj＠cfl.rr.com

Max, Great! Thanks! Joe At 12:56 PM 2/25/03 +0100, you wrote: >On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Joe wrote: > >>Yes, that's the item but I'm pretty certain that he's wrong about it being >a >> field engineer's test set. A couple of list members have tracked down >several >> of these but no docs yet. > >Hi > >The diagrams of the plugglable units should be available at: >http://www.piercefuller.com/collect/ibmpu/ > >Max

23 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb