>From: ard(a)p850ug1.demon.co.uk
---snip---
>
>> different today, how can people relate to this? While there are still a few
>> people who know how to make a horseshoe at a blacksmiths there will be
>> nobody who knows how to run the early mainframes in 50 years, things are
>
>Rubbish!. Are you seriously trying to tell me that these skills can't be
>learnt? I would claim that anybody who _truely_ understood a modern
>machine would have no problems on an older one. The fact that very few
>people understand modern computers is the problem, not that the older
>machines are so different.
>
>-tony
>
Hi
I think these older machines are easier to work on. Things
are more exposed and excessable. Most of the newer machines
one has today are not even as repairable( motherboard fails,
swap out motherboard! ).
Dwight
Anybody know where to get memory (4mb simm or better) for a mac IIfx cheap or
have some they dont want. I think its 64 pin proprietary memory (also used in
a specific mac printer cant recall).
Its funny how apple makes proprietary memory for only 1 specific model
computer (how is that cost effective?), just like the memory upgrade for my
apple 4/600 PS laser (one of a kind).
Hi,
What is the official current subscriptionprocedure
to subcribe to the cctalk list ?
Sipke de Wal
----------------------------------------------------
http://xgistor.ath.cx
----------------------------------------------------
Hello Toth,
Noticed you posted on the web back in Dec of 2002 you
had a pallet full of JC80 parts, we are still using
the JC80 here at the University of Texas, do you still
have those parts?
Thank you,
Jeff McComas
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
This afternoon, I hauled home an IBM System/36 - PC (5364), complete
with dedicated IBM PC (5150), Monitor, KB, cables and an IBM 4224
printer, but no documentation, all from my local Farmer's Insurance
agent. The system is complete, including the "Farmers Master System
Diskette". The components are badged "Farmers Insurance Group 5280Z".
Googling indicates that these systems were fairly common.
The system boots to the Service Control Menu, then continues the IPL to
a IPL Sign On menu.
Does anyone know the Service password or the Backup Service password for
the Service Control Menu? Does anyone know another way into this system?
I am an absolute neophyte on this system, so any help, warnings, war
stories, etc. would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Martin Marshall
I guess this might be slightly OT, and maybe a little bit of a rant,
though lots of Diamond products are easily 10 years old or older...
I just found out today that the massive archive of drivers and firmware
that was on the the Diamond ftp server [ftp://ftp.diamondmm.com/] is gone.
I didn't have the bandwidth to mirror it, but I sure hope someone here got
a copy when I recommended months back (Modem/Supra thread) that someone
archive it.
The support page for Diamond products
[http://www.diamondmm.com/support/diamond/] formerly contained links to
files on the ftp server. It now has the following posted:
S3 or Diamond Brand Support
We no longer support customer service or warranty claims on any of our
legacy products sold under the former S3 or Diamond brand. As we no
longer manufacture these products, and have not for some time, our
customer care and warranty claim call volumes related to these products
are extremely low. Because of this, we made the decision to discontinue
support for these products. If you are experiencing problems with your
Diamond or S3 legacy product please contact an independent repair
professional. We appreciate your understanding in this matter and hope
that this change does not inconvenience you greatly.
The above statement seems totally ludicrous, as how is "an independent
repair professional" (which I think I more than qualify for) supposed to
support these products without the files that were available on the ftp
site?
I put in a call to their technical support staff at (206) 515-1400, and
when I selected option '5' for diamond products, it referred me back to
the above support url, claiming that support files were available on the
website. The phone system then hung up, and I called back again selecting
the Supra support and 'other' products...same thing. I finally got someone
on the line by selecting Supra support and the first and only product the
phone system mentioned. I think it was option 4 and 1. Talk about a
nightmare.
Turns out, they've suddenly had a massive influx of calls from other
slightly annoyed customers who still support and use all this "obsolete
hardware." Personally, I don't see how hardware can be "obsolete" if it
works and does exactly what you need it to. They also seemed to have no
clue that older versions of firmware and such are very important when
maintaining and supporting these things. The ftp server formerly contained
nearly every version that had been released. Now its all gone. Some of
these products were only a couple of years old too. If other hardware
forums haven't had info about this yet, they probably will soon...
If anyone else wants to call and ask questions, the phone number above
should get you though to someone. I've asked them about returning the ftp
site to its former state, as that would seem to be the best solution for
everyone right now.
-Toth
Going to kids garage sale or goodwill....or grab it here...
Its a dual floppy 8088 10mhz laptop.
I am not into x86 boxes
Worked last timed I tried it out.
You supply power supply...
Offers welcome. Trade - not interested in cash (...):
72 pin parity ram, sun sparc 20 cpu module(s)...
Claude
http://computer_collector.tripod.com
On May 27, 21:37, John Honniball wrote:
> vassilip(a)dsl.cis.upenn.edu wrote:
> > So when the BBC + Torch arrived, the genious who was responsible
for
> > assembling the kit, promptly added a mains plug to the power cable
> > and plugged it in, feeding 240V AC to the +5 and +12V rails.
>
> Same thing happened at my Uni when one of the Prime operators took
> home a BBC for the holidays. She had an external disk drive for it,
> that plugged into the BBC's power underneath the machine (not at
> all obvious). So, she went ahead and fitted a mains plug to the
> three-core cable that fed the drive. Usual release of magic smoke...
Ah, yes, that would be one of those drives suplied by a company who
figured that you don't really need two 0V lines, and 3-core mains flex
is cheap.
I can add another to the "240-into-5 doesn't go" list. I ran the
repair and engineering department for a large Acorn dealer/distributor.
One Saturday, a customer with his son bought a BBC B, Torch Z80 with
disk pack, and a high-res Microvitec monitor; well over UKP1000 in
those days. He was back on the Monday, looking very sad. His son had
connected everything together before finding that the "mains plug"
didn't fit. When he changed it, the fuse blew, so he replaced it and
tried again :-(
He was very nice about it, quite philosophical, and so we tried quite
hard to rescue what we could, and find second-hand parts. We salvaged
one of the two drives. We repaired the monitor. We found a spare BBC
B board -- the original was deemed unrepairable. The disk pack PSU was
a write-off, but we got the original Beeb PSU back from the shop. The
Z80 board didn't look healthy, and he let us keep that too.
Eventually, we stripped every IC and some other damaged parts off the
board, fitted sockets everywhere, repaired several tracks with quite a
lot of wire-wrap wire and epoxy, and it became a test bed. The Z80 got
similar treatment, except it didn't need track repairs, and we turned
it over to a teenager who was with us for work experience. We thought
it would be good (de)soldering practice. He was delighted when he
ended up with a clean board, and even more so when the fully-socketed
version worked at the the end of it, so I suppose some good came of it
all -- he'd apparently been something of a problem to the college
tutors before he discovered there was something he could actually
achieve.
Those Torch Z80's were a royal pain. After that incident, we told the
shops not to take out or replace the BBC supply under any
circumstances, and eventually Torch stopped the practice of replacing
the original PSU. The Beeb SMPSU was perfectly capable of running a
fully-expanded machine with a Torch processor, so using Torch's rather
inferior (but more powerful) unit was not a good idea.
The Torch Z80 board is about Eurocard size, fitted with a short 40-way
ribbon cable, and was supposed to be mounted in the lid of the BBC B,
using four PCB mounts of the type that have self-adhesive pads. They
used to fall off after a while. Now you might think that's just
irritating (it's certainly awkward to fit correctly) but it's more than
that. When it falls, it tends to short things out. Unfortunately, the
regulation on Torch PSUs is very poor when they crowbar, and when the
5V rail comes back after it's shut down, it tends to overshoot -- by
about 4 volts, according to our scope. TTL doesn't like 9V. I've seen
at least two Beebs destroyed that way.
One of them looked fine, but didn't work -- something of a puzzle, as
the owner had replaced the original Acorn PSU and we didn't know he had
been using the Torch one. It just went "tick-tick-tick", as they do
when they're shorted, or as in this case, detect over-current. So we
put it on a bench supply, thinking either to blow off a faulty
capacitor or maybe find a hot chip. No, but it drew 9 amps (a Beeb
usually takes about two) and after a little while it was obvious
several LS TTL chips were cooking. So we removed them. Back on the
PSU, still several amps over normal. A few more hot chips after a
short while. And so it went on, until all that was left was the NMOS
(all of which still worked). Another expensive repair.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
>From: "Peter Turnbull" <pete(a)dunnington.u-net.com>
---snip---
>
>Not from a capacitor as a whole, but if you look inside the "black
>box"... The discussion was about electrolytic capacitors. Of course
>they have an insulator (the oxide on the aluminium foil anode) but they
>also have an electrolyte (which is the cathode), and indeed wouldn't
>(don't) work without it. It's the ability of the electrodes to conduct
>electrons that give the capacitor its ability to store them.
>
>--
>Pete Peter Turnbull
The other trick of the electrolytic is that the aluminum is
slightly etched first before forming. This greatly increases
the surface area and gives a higher capacitance per square
inch of foil.
I have a radio that was made in the 50's. I brought the
capacitors in it up slowly. I've checked them on my
bridge and they are all above 45% of the labeled value.
The radio works fine.
Dwight
On May 25, 20:19, William R. Buckley wrote:
> Steve Leach said:
>
> > If you could humor my electronic ignorance, what exactly
> > is a tantalum cap and how does it differ from a normal
> > capacitor? I was never before aware that there could be
> > more to a capacitor than plates (or foil) and an
> > electrolyte. How can a capacitor have a polarity?
>
> Not an electrolyte, an insulator. It is the inability to
> conduct electrons which gives the capacitor its ability to
> collect electrons.
> [...] Now, by being ionic, these electrolytes
> are well suited to the conduction of electron flow. This
> is most definately not the kind of behavior which you wish
> to obtain from a capacitor.
Not from a capacitor as a whole, but if you look inside the "black
box"... The discussion was about electrolytic capacitors. Of course
they have an insulator (the oxide on the aluminium foil anode) but they
also have an electrolyte (which is the cathode), and indeed wouldn't
(don't) work without it. It's the ability of the electrodes to conduct
electrons that give the capacitor its ability to store them.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
This reminds me of a true story regarding a BBC microcomputer.
This was in the early 80s when a company called Torch produced
an auxiluary processor for the BBC (I think so that it could run
CP/M programs).
Anyway the Torch was an external box that contained its own PSU and
connected via a ribbon cable with the BBC micro, which served as
the keyboard/display peripheral for the Torch.
Early BBCs had problems with their own PSU (it overheated), so the
Torch people removed the PSU from the BBC and used another cable to
supply power *to* the BBC from the Torch box. Unfortunately, they
used a cable that looked like a power cable.
So when the BBC + Torch arrived, the genious who was responsible for
assembling the kit, promptly added a mains plug to the power cable
and plugged it in, feeding 240V AC to the +5 and +12V rails.
I looked at that mainboard afterwards and a lot of tracks had melted!
**vp
> From: "Mike Ross" <mross666(a)hotmail.com>
> IBM made a bunch of printer terminals based around the Selectric typewriter
> - 1052, 2740, 2970 etc. Look in any old copy of BYTE, and you'll also find
> several vendors were selling 3rd party terminals based around IBM
> Selectrics, often converted for ASCII/RS-232c operation, as teletype
> alternatives.
>
> Where have they all gone? (I appreciate, from what I've heard, that many
> folks who used them in anger would reply 'I don't know, I don't care, good
> riddance!') Early DECwriters are not uncommon. Teletypes are (almost) ten a
> penny, ASR33s show up frequently enough on ebay, I have several.
>
> But the only Selectric based unit I've *seen* in over ten years of
> collecting is a 2970 Reservation Termainal (see
> http://www.corestore.org/2970-1.jpg ) which I was offered a year or so ago.
> It needs a fair bit of TLC, and it's a print-only device; it can receive
> data from a host and print it, but not send anything back from the keyboard.
>
> I'd love to get a bidirectional equivalent to use as an 'authentic' terminal
> for a 360 emulator I work with... any clues? Can anyone recommend a
> Selectric repair shop? No way I want to try to fettle something THIS
> mechanically-intimidating myself!
Look at my sig...you'll see where they've all gone :) I have a
dozen or so Selectric, Selectric II, and Selectric III typewriters,
mostly in various states of sticky disrepair.
Actually, I don't have any Selectric terminals, although I do have a
Selectric Memory Typewriter. My brother worked at a Byte Shop in the
late 70s, and recalls having either converted a Selectric or making a
conversion work.
I do have a manual from 1962 titled "IBM Customer Engineering Manual of
Instruction, I/O Printer, (Modified IBM Selectric), which shows the
glorious workings of this fascinating machine...the manual has lots of
text and diagrams explaining the Selectric mechanism, but not much in
the way of photos showing the solenoid mechanisms.
We were thinking a few years ago of trying to rig up a homebrew
conversion of one of my typewriters, but never got round to it. But I
did (in 1999?) see a conversion kit sell on ebay...and I was foolish
enough to not buy it.
--
Jim
Visit the Selectric Typewriter Museum!
http://www.mindspring.com/~jforbes2
Subject: RE: Where have all the Selectrics gone?
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 00:36:49 -0400
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
>Are these based on a Selectric?
>http://www.govliquidation.com/auction/view?auctionId=206563&convertTo=USD
Yes!!!! Exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for. Good catch! You can tell
they're the 'I/O Selectric' by the extra-deep chassis, compared with a
standard Selectric typewriter... no idea what interface they might be, but
what the hell...
Guess it's a bid on all 35 of them, or none at all... anyone else in with me
for some?
Mike
http://www.corestore.org
John Allain wrote:
.
> Not only that but I believe that Raytheon would rebuild Vaxes
> from the circuit description using advanced SMD and hybrid
> chips to make them something like 1/4 the size and weight
> of the non-gov. models.
Wow - now that would be something to add to the collection! Does
anybody on the list want to confess to owning such a beastie? If
so, please, don't be cruel - post a link to some pictures.
--Steve.
smj(at)spamfree.crash.com (lose spamfree to get through, m'kay?)
On May 27, 16:34, Greg Elkin wrote:
> Got given a couple of "Dyna 5" BA23-size QBUS enclosures a bit ago -
> a bit tatty (rusted & dirty, must try to get a sandblaster or
> something to see if they can be rescued)
> just looking through the cards, can't ID this one yet :
>
>
> dual height QBUS
> Baydel (http://www.baydel.com) logo on the handles, "Baydel ltd" "CCK
> 2789" "B01079 iss4 C1984 CTS-11" on the board.
> Any ideas? Didn't turn anything usefull up on Google, I've emailed
> Baydel support for a laugh...
Baydel were (are?) latterly quite well known for RAID systems; prior to
that they made (amongst other things) QBus floppy controllers, to
connect to SA800/850 drives. I have a couple of single-density ones
that emulate an RXV11 or a pair of RXV11s. I'd guess this board is an
emulation of an RXV21, to connect to SA800/850 drives. Power it up,
and see if it responds to the RXV21 addresses.
BTW, I found Baydel quite helpful when I wanted some information about
mine (labelled F11-311) -- but that was a decade ago and I don't know
if the same technical staff will still be there.
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York
Hello,
I know that your request is over six months old, so you may no longer be
interested. Did you find the information you need on the 4052? I have a 1981
Tektronix catalog that has a one-page summary of the characteristics of this
device. Let me know if it is useful to you and I will send you a scanned
copy.
Tom Dodds
869 Milwaukee St.
Denver, Colorado 80206
Info request : Tek 4052
Hans B Pufal cctech(a)classiccmp.org
Tue Oct 8 10:51:19 2002
Previous message: OSI disk basic disk
Next message: scsi drive + misc. other stuff (free pentium machines & 10
year rule/windows)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
We are exhibiting a Tektronix 4052 computer and I am looking for some
info on the beastie:
Year of introduction
Price at introduction
Memory size
Processor
Clock frequency
Tape capacity
Tape speed
Screen resolution
The web seems somewhat reluctant to divulge this info and I'd appreciate
your help.
Regards,
-- Hans B Pufal
Ok, I know NOTHING about openVMS. However, this just came up...
A friend of a friend offered me what he says is a complete set of OpenVMS
media. No manuals, just the media.
Several questions:
>From what I understand, isn't there some type of hobbyist free license for
openvms? If so, not sure why I should grab the media from him if I can just
download it. Or is there a value to getting the media from him, as to it
giving me the ability to purchase a license transfer or something... in
short, is there a special reason getting "real" media is desirable?
Lastly... he said it runs on vax's and pdp's. Not sure if he knows what he's
talking about, so I'll ask here. Could this run on my 11/44?
Thanks for any enlightenment!
Jay West
>What is the polarity of the 12V DC connector on the back of the machine?
The middle pin is positive and is commond to battery connector.
_________________________________________________________________
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Well, I must say I'm rather amazed at how quickly I got a response.
Within an hour of my post, two individuals (Steve Thatcher and Scott
LaBombard) both provided the information on the tantalum cap, and I
found the parts at DigiKey. Thanks guys!
I'm so glad to see some hope at getting the Altair back up and running.
When it sizzled popped and smoked, it was like an old friend had died.
If you could humor my electronic ignorance, what exactly IS a tantalum
cap and how does it differ from a normal capacitor? I was never before
aware that there could be more to a capacitor than plates (or foil) and
an electrolyte. How can a capacitor have a polarity?
Another question, does anyone know where I can find a replacement for
the two position front panel switches on the Altair which are marked
"AMERICAN U.S.A ST1-1" These are 2 pos 3 contact switches, and I've not
been able to find anything exactly the same dimensions. I am hoping
that this is some standard switch and I'm just not aware of it :-)
Also, I've come across rumers of Altair manuals online in PDF format.
Does anyone know where I could find such a thing?
I'm sure I'll have more questions once I get the poor machine put back
together and start trying to figure out the disk drives and controllers
:-) The machine was stored for over seven years in a barn wrapped in
plastic bags (not my decision! Don't burn me at the stake!) I wonder
how many more surprises I'm in for?
Went to a flea market today and I picked up and HP 29C in excellent
condition for $2.00
That's it but I just had to brag so there :)
Thank you
Francois
Many years ago Practical Electronics in the UK
published the design of a microprocessor-based system
called the CHAMP. If I remember rightly it was built
on Veroboard. I remember reading the articles in the
school library and wishing I could build one.
Did anyone ever build one of these ? Do the plans
still exist anywhere ?
Also, I'd like to re-acquaint myself with the Microtan
65 which was one of the first systems I ever owned.
Are there any systems still in existence ?
Dave.
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
What about the serial or parallel line printers that
used a type band/belt?
i used to see alot in the add's for pc's now thier
gone too.
i wouldn't mind finding one for the pc just to hear
the noise again;)
i remember the operating noises they made paper
clamp,line feed and the hammers hitting the paper -
the order of printing was(from the back of the printer
to the front of the paper)
hammer's,paper,ribbon then type band.
Bill
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 18:33:01 -0700
From: J Forbes <jforbes2(a)mindspring.com>
To: Cassic Computing <cctech(a)classiccmp.org>
Subject: Re: Where have all the Selectrics gone?
Reply-To: cctech(a)classiccmp.org
> From: "Mike Ross" <mross666(a)hotmail.com>
> IBM made a bunch of printer terminals based around
the Selectric
typewriter
> - 1052, 2740, 2970 etc. Look in any old copy of
BYTE, and you'll also
find
> several vendors were selling 3rd party terminals
based around IBM
> Selectrics, often converted for ASCII/RS-232c
operation, as teletype
> alternatives.
>
> Where have they all gone?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
On May 25, 22:05, Steve Leach wrote:
> If you could humor my electronic ignorance, what exactly IS a
tantalum
> cap and how does it differ from a normal capacitor? I was never
before
> aware that there could be more to a capacitor than plates (or foil)
and
> an electrolyte. How can a capacitor have a polarity?
Almost all electrolytic caps are polarised.
In principle, a tantalum capacitor is just like an aluminium
electrolytic, only using a more exotic metal (tantalum pentoxide has a
dielectric constant about 4-5 times higher than aluminium oxide) and a
solid electrolyte. The anode is the foil (or bead, if it's sintered
tantalum tantalum), the oxide layer on it is the dialectric, and the
electrolyte is the cathode.
Passing current from cathode to anode will build up the oxide layer,
the other way will break it down. From a chemist's point of view,
putting electrons into the cathode and taking them out of the anode
makes some of the metallic aluminium (Al) ionise into Al+++, and if
there are oxygen ions (O--) adjacent, it forms alumina (Al203) --
standard RedOx reaction, exactly the same as anodising aluminium for
protection. You have to maintain the polarity to maintain the oxide
layer; if you reverse it the electrons will break down the oxide layer.
The aluminium ions would gain electrons, the oxygen ions would lose
them, the alumina becomes aluminium and oxygen, and then you have no
more highly-insulating aluminium oxide dielctric.
Think of the aluminium-alumina junction as a junction diode, with a
very high resistance in one direction and a very low resistance the
other way.
There's a brief description of construction at
http://www.chipcenter.com/eexpert/akruger/akruger006.html
--
Pete Peter Turnbull
Network Manager
University of York