So, I'm fooling around with my Tandy PT-210 printing terminal again.
Upon disassembly, these switches are revealed to have rubber domes inside
that electrically connect two isolated semicircles by pressing a circle of
conductive rubber. Wiping with alcohol and blowing them out gives a
closed resistance of around 300 ohms, which is good enough to trigger the
keyboard circuitry. I've come to one that refuses to work at all,
regardless of how I clean it.
So, I have two choices:
1) Glue tiny discs of aluminum to the bottoms of the rubber domes. A
preliminary test of this using water as "glue" suggests this won't work
for long.
2) Find some switches with the same footprint, height, and cross-shaped
acutator. The first two seem easy to get. Mouser lists absolutely no
switches with a cross top.
So, has anyone here any pointers?
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>
>Subject: Re: Bet you didn't know...(PDP-11)
> From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh at aracnet.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:30:40 -0700
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>,
> cctech at classiccmp.org
>
>At 7:09 AM -0400 9/19/06, Allison wrote:
>> >
>>>Subject: Bet you didn't know...(PDP-11)
>>> From: Julian Wolfe <fireflyst at earthlink.net>
>>> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:07:49 -0500
>>> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>>><cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>>>
>>>As of September 30, 2006, the last PDP-11 that rolled off the line
>>>will finally be 10 years old.
>>>
>>>The PDP-11 EOL was actually September 30,1996.
>>
>>Mentec continued it and you can still buy new 11 based boards.
>>
>>Allison
>
>Is Mentec still selling them? From the last time I looked at the
>website, it looked like they were only reselling emulators instead of
>real hardware now.
>
>Still up until recently they were selling new boards.
>
> Zane
They may well have stopped cpu production but only recently.The only CPUs
that have been around near as long in production are:
PDP-8 (cmos 6100 and 6120)
1802
Z80
Allison
Found a USIIi/440, went to put it in, my PROM didn't support it, had to have an update using a 300-333 MHz CPU.
So it goes.
Anyway, that's not a problem. I took a second look at the old card and got it working. For some computers that are almost
on topic now, there's a bit of a hidden catch on the CPUs- they aren't firmly attached, and on some of them (I know that
SGI PMT5 modules do not fall into this category, but HP PA-8000s and USIIis do) the connection is effected with a sheet of
something with conductive rubber blips on it (sound familiar? Wonder how these will work in ~20 years). If you are
not careful to go round-and-round the merry-go-round with the device to snug up the heatsink, the processor becomes canted
and does not make good contact, and becomes generally unhappy and huffy and will not work (how's that for a run-on!)
End of story- I now have an OT Sun Ultra 10 440MHz with Solaris 10 on it- Solaris is much happier on SPARCs than PCs.
Western Digital IDE drives from the late '90s to early 2000s seem to be going bad at shocking rates now, also. Beware.
>
>Subject: Bet you didn't know...(PDP-11)
> From: Julian Wolfe <fireflyst at earthlink.net>
> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:07:49 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>As of September 30, 2006, the last PDP-11 that rolled off the line
>will finally be 10 years old.
>
>The PDP-11 EOL was actually September 30,1996.
Mentec continued it and you can still buy new 11 based boards.
Allison
> > > Does anyone know what sort of interface the AT&T 3b2 uses for its mouse?
> > > I found one which is missing its mouse.
> Sorry. I meant the 3b1 (aka Unix PC)
I think it was a logitech two button rectangular wedge shaped mouse
used by lots of vendors. They came in both serial and parallel, I
think the AT&T one was serial. It has been a long time. Both had a D 9
pin connector.
A picture search on google "3b1" brought up a poor picture of the
mouse with one. Hard to see what it actuually is.
I had several 3B1s go through my hands in the early 1990s.
>
>Subject: Re: CompuPro floppy controller differences
> From: "Dave Dunfield" <dave06a at dunfield.com>
> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 05:45:43 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>> >> You would need quite the desktop case to house an 8" floppy
>> >> drive! :)
>
>> What is more interesting is what a PC with two 8" drives would
>> weigh in at! Most of the good 8" drives were a very solid hunk
>> of aluminum.
>
>There *IS* a (somewhat) PC with dual full-sized 8" drives mounted
>in it - the Nec APC:
>
> http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/nec/index.htm
>
>I can tell you that this thing is big and HEAVY - especially the
>color one.
Having used a color one it was a much better machine than the PCxt
(this is back when they were both new).
The Color CRT besides being big was way over my lift limit!
Allison
>
>Subject: CP/M for Fairchild F8 ?
> From: Jos Dreesen / Marian Capel <jos.mar at bluewin.ch>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:15:05 +0200
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>
>I found a scrapped box today at work :
>
>2 8" floppydrives , RS232 and printer interfaces. Internally an F8
>chipset ( F3850 / F3852 / F3854) with a WD1771 fdc.
>Strangely enough a set of floppies lay on top, labeled Cp/M, Basic CP/m
>Pascal etc.
>
>Was there ever a CP/M version for the F8 ??
>
> Jos Dreesen
No. The F8 at best was a microcontroller. If anything the unit was a smart
floppy controller for a CP/M system.
Allison
>
>Subject: RE: CompuPro floppy controller differences
> From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:22:52 -0700
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
>
>On 9/18/2006 at 8:06 AM Allison wrote:
>
>>3.5" 720k
>
>There were two "standard" versions of the 720K 3.5 format, differing in the
>cluster and FAT size. One was the definition put out by IBM sometime
>around MS-DOS 2.1 and the other, by Microsoft in MS-DOS 4.00 (which was an
>abomination).
>
>So, you haven't used 3.5" 1.3MB DOS diskettes? (2x8x1024)? Many USB
>floppies and Superdrives support the DOS-V format under Windows 2K and XP;
>though FORMAT doesn't appear to understand how to initializae blanks.
>
>...and let's not forget the short-lived "special" distribution formats from
>IBM and Microsoft that got around 1.8MB per 3.5" floppy by using more
>sectors per track+interleave+skew(MS DMF) or differing sector sizes (IBM
>XDF). I suppose you could call those "standard", since they were
>officially-endorsed formats.
>
Just goes to prove PCs and what standards. ;)
They were all over the map just like all the other boxen on storage.
Allison
Hi,
I have been having problems with my Dreamcast
(that I use to surf the 'net) resetting randomly.
After checking out the power lines, it seems
that the stepdown convertor is at fault. It
has a crack and 2 bulging bits (where the
plastic has been molded with lumps instead of
flat) on the underside.
How dangerous is this if it is the cause of
the problem?
It converts a 240V input to a 110V output (not
been able to check the exact specs on it, as
it's in use and very hot), as my Dreamcast I
am using is a Japanese model (my UK model
isn't fully functioning).
Reply to me directly if you believe it isn't of
interest to the other listmembers.
I have just been on eBay to get a replacement.
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 13:58:47 -0500, John Foust <jfoust at threedee.com>
wrote:
> At 02:35 PM 9/16/2006, CRC wrote:
>> The basic problem with commercial CD burners/players is that they
>> keep the laser diodes on when powered, although at the low power
>> required for reading. The life of run-of-the-mill laser diodes is on
>> the order of 10,000 (10.000) hours. Consequently, if you keep your
>> system on all the time you can expect one to two years of useful life
>> from the beast (some longer, some shorter). From <http://
>> www.wtec.org/ loyola/opto/ad_rohm.htm>:
>
> That document dates from 1994. You'd think that manufacturers would
> want to increase MTBF and eliminate failures as quickly as possible,
> so I find it hard to believe that LEDs are left on inside today's
> CD/DVDs just because it's hard to turn them off and they don't want
> to improve lifetimes. This info may be entirely relevant for
> 1980s drives, who knows?
My intent was to address classic computer equipment. MTBFs of Laser
Diodes (LDs - not LEDs) has definitely increased over the last 10
years. However, access to information of the ones used in current CD
equipment is privy only to large scale manufacturers. Looking at LDs
that are used in fiber optic transmission shows a substantial
increase in MTBF over the past 10 years. However, I would hold off on
buying into the BlueRay recorders - blue LDs are still have low MTBFs.
CD equipment production has progressed to commodity class and every
penny represents a margin change of $10k / 1M units - design is done
by taking out things until the unit doesn't work :=)). Adding the
circuitry to turn off the laser is not difficult, but it costs money...
> What sorts of other ancedotes and
> claimed facts do we have?
>
> From the CD-R FAQ: http://www.cdrfaq.org/faq05.html
>
> Subject: [5-2] How long do CD recorders last? (1998/04/06)
>
> The MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) on these drives is
> typically 50,000
> to 100,000 hours, and they come with a 1 year warranty. Compare
> that to
> hard drives rated at between 500,000 and 1,000,000 hours with a 3
> or 5
> year warranty and that should give you some idea. Most of the drives
> available today weren't meant for mass production of CD-Rs. The only
> exceptions are the venerable Philips CDD 522, Kodak PCD 600, and
> Sony CDW-900E.
>
I assume that the FAQ uses manufacturers stated MTBF - there is no
citation for their source.
> By 2004, MTBF for consumer CD/DVD were up to 60K to 100K hours:
>
> http://www.computingondemand.com/reviews/storage-LiteOn-LDW-411S/
> page1.shtml
>
> And perhaps their MTBF was calculated with a 2% duty cycle, which
> would still mean they expect a consumer DVD-R to be able to burn
> several thousand discs. I suspect consumer losses are due more to
> dust and crud on discs... unless of course you simply don't want to
> trust manufacturer-provided MTBFs.
In most cases, the criteria for the MTBF is not stated as indicated
by your suposition. One has to look at MTBF at temperature since
Optek shows a factor of greater than 25 in MTBF between 25 and 70 C.
If the tests were run at 20C and you run the device at 50C you can
expect 6K and 9K hours vs 70K and 100K hours respectively (based on
ratios from the Optek MTBF data for their OPV200 series high
reliability LDs). At 70C it's around 1.5K and 2K hours. It's not
that I don't trust the manufacturer, it's just that there is
insufficient info and the manufacturer's shills will present their
most favorable data.
Besides the mechanical/electrical failures, which there are many, the
LDs power loss generally results in the inability to record and read
reliably. Note that the LD does not touch the disk and unless it is
used in a smoky/cruddy atmosphere there should be no failure in the
optical link. In trying to repair a good number of CDR/W I have
recovered only several units by cleaning the LD lens. Recording
generally uses virgin disks and an occasional brushing of the lens
does help.
>
> Your average $50 Wal-Mart DVD drive has a 70K MTBF:
>
> http://www.liteon.com/prod/getProduct.do?
> cid=1_7_13&xml_id=4_2&menu_id=4_2_7
Note that the stated MTBF is in POH - power on hours - not usage
hours. I guess if you use it all bets are off :=P
CRC
As of September 30, 2006, the last PDP-11 that rolled off the line
will finally be 10 years old.
The PDP-11 EOL was actually September 30,1996.
As an interesting tidbit, the life span of the PDP-11 still has the
PC beat by two years at this point in time.
Here's to many more years of enjoyable service...
> From: David Griffith <dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu>
>
> Does anyone know what sort of interface the AT&T 3b2 uses for its mouse?
> I found one which is missing its mouse.
>
I've never seen a 3b2 with a graphics display. While I've seen an awful lot
of 3b2s (AT&T carpet bombed Gatech with them in the mid-80s), that doesn't
mean there wasn't one.
Do you perhaps mean the AT&T Blit family of graphics terminals
(Jerq/Blit/5620/630/730) that were often serially attached to 3b2s? If so,
http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/retrocomputing/att/5620/5620_faq.html should
be a start, as well as any surviving archive of comp.terminals.tty5620.
These things are nifty.
Ken
Now for what is no doubt a very stupid question that I'm hoping
someone can help with.
I'm using "Turbo Macro Assembler '05", and have verified that it
works with the following simple little program that I got off the web:
* = $1000
loop: inc $d020 ; increment $d020
jmp loop ; jump to label loop
I can get <-- 3 "Assemble and run" to work just fine, however while
<-- 5 "Assemble to disk" seems to work, how on earth do I execute the
program that is created? Obviously I need to do a:
LOAD"FLASH",8,1
It loads just fine, and I assume I need a SYS statement with an
address to start it, but what on earth should that address be?
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
>
>Subject: RE: CompuPro floppy controller differences
> From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Chuck Guzis wrote:
>> You've forgotten the original DOS 1.x 160K SS and 320K DS. I wonder if the
>> conservative 8-sector approach on the part of IBM/Microsoft was the
>> miserable track record of the original (IIRC, Shugart) drives. The one
>While there might be regional variations, I NEVER saw IBM use a
>Shugart in the 5150. For the first year or so, it seems like they were
>all Tandon TM100-1, and later IBM contracted to have drives made with IBM
>front panels by CDC? and others.
Likely because every working SA400 (400L) I have has been repaired or
lightly used, lousy track record for reliability.
>But not Shugart. OTOH, TRS80 and Apple][ both used Shugart mechanisms
>(SA400 for TRS80, SA390?? for Apple(with Apple's own board on them))
>Most of the early Shugart SA400s were 35 track, instead of 40.
By 1980 the SA400 was always the SA400L 40 track version. One issue of
the time was shortages of TTL ICs and disk drive getting scarce due
to demand.
Allison
>
>Subject: Re: CompuPro floppy controller differences
> From: Patrick Finnegan <pat at computer-refuge.org>
> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:42:54 -0400
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Saturday 16 September 2006 16:30, Allison wrote:
>> >As much as I dislike PeeCees, at least they have the benefit of
>> >standardization.
>>
>> Ah, it's using the definitive PC FDC. It was developed well before
>> PCs standardized. PCs however don't offer much choice and if they did
>> keep all the FDC features you could put a 8" on a PC and read SSSD!
>
>I actually *can* do that on a K6-2 box I've got sitting at work (and
>have done it several times).
I have a few that can too, so much for standard. ;)
Allison
Regarding the patents: it is likely that what is being talked about is not the general "trackball" patent but a
specific technique of ruggedizing a trackball for hostile situations.
That would be my read, anyway.
Scott
Well, had a marathon evening over at Bear's place a week and a bit ago - brought over the
disks from my ailing IRIS to see what we could scavenge. They had GL2-W2.5 on
one disk, and assorted projects on the other (looks like this was one of the machines that
Virginia Tech had (what was it's journey over here, I wonder...) and tried to port X11R5 to
IRIS graphics on. (doesn't seem to have worked).
Short answer - PSU seems OK, likely just noise from the improvised scope probes.
Bad news: the pin headers on these beasts seem to be getting fragile. Bear's went out
with the same symptoms (no memory seen, no graphics) after we tried a boardswap
(to verify general functionality of a boardset, not to fix anything).
If you have one of these beasts, pull your PSU apart and replace the 4 green paper caps
on 2 boards (2 caps per board, one board is the 5v welder output, the other is the main
chopper). They seem to be on their last legs, this is the second machine I've seen that
suffered an olfactory capacitor failure.
And the Mac stuff- IIs, IIxes and, perhaps, IIfxes have canned electrolytics on their
logic boards that leak. This effluvium has, on two occasions that I have verified, eaten
through the board trace that links the power-on circuitry to the power-on switch and
keyboard port (one II, one IIx). If you have one of these machines, you might want to
check your boards and clean them if they show signs of leakage. If you have a beast
that will not power-on, I can point you where to look... it was the same area on both
machines. No word yet if it messed with any of the other traces.
At 02:35 PM 9/16/2006, CRC wrote:
>The basic problem with commercial CD burners/players is that they
>keep the laser diodes on when powered, although at the low power
>required for reading. The life of run-of-the-mill laser diodes is on
>the order of 10,000 (10.000) hours. Consequently, if you keep your
>system on all the time you can expect one to two years of useful life
>from the beast (some longer, some shorter). From <http://www.wtec.org/ loyola/opto/ad_rohm.htm>:
That document dates from 1994. You'd think that manufacturers would
want to increase MTBF and eliminate failures as quickly as possible,
so I find it hard to believe that LEDs are left on inside today's
CD/DVDs just because it's hard to turn them off and they don't want
to improve lifetimes. This info may be entirely relevant for
1980s drives, who knows? What sorts of other ancedotes and
claimed facts do we have?
From the CD-R FAQ: http://www.cdrfaq.org/faq05.html
Subject: [5-2] How long do CD recorders last? (1998/04/06)
The MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) on these drives is typically 50,000
to 100,000 hours, and they come with a 1 year warranty. Compare that to
hard drives rated at between 500,000 and 1,000,000 hours with a 3 or 5
year warranty and that should give you some idea. Most of the drives
available today weren't meant for mass production of CD-Rs. The only
exceptions are the venerable Philips CDD 522, Kodak PCD 600, and Sony CDW-900E.
By 2004, MTBF for consumer CD/DVD were up to 60K to 100K hours:
http://www.computingondemand.com/reviews/storage-LiteOn-LDW-411S/page1.shtml
And perhaps their MTBF was calculated with a 2% duty cycle, which
would still mean they expect a consumer DVD-R to be able to burn
several thousand discs. I suspect consumer losses are due more to
dust and crud on discs... unless of course you simply don't want to
trust manufacturer-provided MTBFs.
Your average $50 Wal-Mart DVD drive has a 70K MTBF:
http://www.liteon.com/prod/getProduct.do?cid=1_7_13&xml_id=4_2&menu_id=4_2_7
- John
Hi,
I got some 68000 DIP chips for ?3.00 off of www.vintagecomputermarketplace.com the other week. I finally
got around to checking that they are of use to me (
by comparing them with notes I have on the internals
of my old A600 Rev 1.1) and discovered that they ma
y not be of use to me! :(
Here's the low-down on them:
MC68000P10
2 C91E DIP chip (rectangle with pins on l
ong sides) x 2
QEDB9215
S (large logo S) SCN68000CAN64
2208N19 DIP chip x1
9035KE
Any idea's what computer they are from/for?
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Does anyone have a copy of the HP 64516A PROM Programmer Module manual?
This is for the 27512 chip bucket, not the main control card. I'd like to
build one of these, so I'm specifically looking for the schematic and parts
list from the manual. Thanks.
-- Dave
4D/35 has a seperate fan on the compute side to cool the 35 MHz R3000.
I have a 4D/25 that a prior owner let choke with dust and the heat ate the R3010 and
the RE2 on the graphics side, cooling is definitely an issue on these beasts.
Is it Express or Eclipse graphics? Express will have the stereo connector.
If eclipse, is it Turbo or normal?
Josh, did you get my offlist E-mail?
How many Amps should the fuse in the C64 be rated for? The fuse I
pulled is a 1.5A 250V fuse, yet "Troubleshooting & Repairing your
Commodore 64" says to use a 1A 250V fuse. A quick bit of googling
seems to indicate that it should be 1.5A.
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, |
| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. |
| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |
How does one bolt one DEC corporate cabinet (RK07-PA/H9642) to another
corporate cabinet (H9612-AA)?
The H9612 has the removable black area of the side panel, so I was able to
put them next to each other and it looks seamless.
How does one attach them with hardware, and what do I need?
Thanks
Julian