Hello All,
>
>While I was checking the spelling, I notice that wikipedia mentions
>another name for pop rivets is blind rivets.
>
I _love_ Wikipedia, but it certainly has its share of errors. Please: Never equate
pop rivets with "blind" rivets. Blind rivet is a sort of generic term -- meaning that
it's a form of rivet that can be used even though you do not have access to the other
side of the rivet. Blind rivets are used on commercial aircraft, but only in relatively small
quantities -- and -- each catagory of (blind) rivet is carefully chosen to perform a certain
task. Most times, when we install blind fasteners (rivets fall into the broad catagory
of fasteners), we have to get Engineering approval. Most installations of blind rivets are
actually considered temporary. They will usually be removed during a Heavy Maintenance
Visit (often several years later).
Pop rivets fall at the very bottom of the rivet catagory. Pop rivets are never used on commercial
aircraft structure, although I've used a lot of (a certain higher quality catagory of) them to fasten
things like nutplates (all they are doing is holding what amounts to a nut, in place, while a bolt is tightened).
Once tight, the bolt is tight the rivets are meaningless until you need to remove the bolt again. If the "pop" (type)
rivets don't hold, then a veritable stream of cursing insues, while you go and try to find the right drill bits
to remove the offending nutplates. Then, the little buggers almost always spin while you curse more and
try to get a small pair of ViseGrips on the bottom of them (often very difficult due to space constraints), so you
can smash them into submission, while you continue to drill them out.
"Cherry-Max" rivets are a very popular form of blind fastener (in this case, blind rivet). They have a solid
core of wickedly hard stainless steel that remains in place as the rivet is "pulled" into its compressed final
product. Not only are they relatively heavy, they do not expand in the same way that solid rivets do -- plus
you now have a dissimilar metal situation.
Speaking of pop rivets: There is a kitplane (an excellent work horse of a plane) that makes use of thousands of
closely spaced pop rivets. I used to be able to recall its name off the top of my head, but this library computer
will not allow me to open another instance of my browser (to search google and figure it out). It was a sort of ugly, boxy, utilatarian looking plane. It was so "ugly" that it was actually very cool!! It's supposedly nearly
"indestructable."
Oh, BTW, "regular" solid aluminum rivets are only very slightly smaller than their correctly drilled, and in some
cases, reamed holes. When the are compressed (bucked), they expand and tightly fill the hole. It's certainly an
impressive art to get a properly shaped "bucked" head (also called "shop head"). If the bucked head is smashed
too much or "leans" over, you've got to remove them. Technically, you are supposed to go to the next larger
size because the material around the hole is now work hardened. If everyone actually removed ever screwed
up rivet, there would be little hope of repair at a later time (because you don't have much leeway as to size).
I'm pretty sure that that's how ships remained fairly water-tight. The final result of solid rivets are not always perfect. Upon close inspection of any commerical airliner, I can find dozens of leaking or "smoking" rivets. Technically speaking, they should be replaced. Realistically, it's a case of "what are you going to do?" I did a lightning inspection on a 757 that said they were hit on short final. It was raining and miserable (and very dark). It wasn't until the last section of inspection that I realized that I'd forgotten to check a few antennas. One thing led to
another, and we eventually found way over 100 affected rivets (and outright holes). The plane was taken out of service for a couple of months, but I saw it again (with lots of very large rivets, which were used to "fill" some
of the lightning strike holes).
Always choose the correct rivet for the job(!!!).
Regards,
Robert Greenstreet
> Does anyone have any recollections or information
> about the DTC MicroFile? Data Terminals and
> Communications made it. It's a piece of furniture
> on wheels, contains a box with a dual 8" floppy drive and
> appears to be designed to sit in between a terminal
> and a daisywheel printer -- a primitive word processor?
> Haven't had a chance to crack the box open yet, and am
> curious if anyone has any concrete information.
>
> Cheers
> Brian
I just uploaded several documents on it to
http://bitsavers.org/pdf/dtc/microFile
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:52:14 -0800
> From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
> Subject: RE: Compuserve wayback machine
>
> On 10 Jan 2007 at 21:29, Richard A. Cini wrote:
>
> So, exactly the same thing happened to you that happened to me.
>
> > They actually want you to pay $18/month for access, which I guess
represents
> > the legacy dial-up business.
>
> Which is exactly the opposite of what you'd expect. When I dropped
> service at the end of 2004, my monthly bill was about $9.50
/month.
> How do they expect to compete with the likes of NetZero and
PeoplePC?
>
I've actually kept my Compuserve account alive all this time as an
emergency travelling ISP.
One of the incarnations of my cable internet provider didn't allow off
net access to POP and SMTP
so I discovered that the extensive network of dialups was useful.
Under the later revs of their network, you can dial in, authenticate,
and then just use PPP to access the internet directly. You get about
3/hours/mo dial-in time for free and usage rates there after.
I logged in yesterday via the web.... it takes a little redirection to
the "native" Compuserve site as the inital screen wants a "Screen Name"
and won't accept a PPN. I thought I set a name for my account but I
don't remember it and I didnt write it down anywhere (it was too
"obvious" ;^} )
There is a Vintage Computing forum still active, and the files area
still has stuff dating way back at least to the 80s.
I am still carrying a $9.99/mo legacy subscription, but I don't think
they'll let you sign up for that anymore.
They now have a BYOA (Bring Your Own Access) rate advertised.
I noticed someone in a support forum mention some sort of backup rate
of $3/month. I'm guessing that they'll have deals to try to keep
getting some money from you if you may quit.
I just got a Cingular 8525 and an unlimited data rate, so I'll
probably drop this soon. I'm off to learn more about Windows CE.
Dave.
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:56:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com>
Subject: Re: only on govliquidation.com could this happen....
> <http://cgi.govliquidation.com/auction/view?auctionId=1090219&convertTo=USD>
>
> Lot includes....
> ...
> 10 RECTAL SPECULUMS - what?!?!
That's for inserting the typing element.
---------------------------------
ROTFL!!!
Cameron, your humour (and medical expertise) make
wading through the dreck worth while; thanks for a
good laugh!
mike
At 11:30 -0600 1/12/07, Mike wrote:
> I just checked my TI-58C, and it does indeed take a 3.3VAC 500ma power
>pack. The links I posted earlier agree. The connector is keyed. The
>part number is AC-9131. Are you sure that's the right pack, Stan? The
>references say the TI-58 uses the same AC-9131 pack.
The numbers so far are not totally inconsistent. The wart might
supply 6.x V open-circuit or low-current, but rely on the battery
pack to pull it down to 3.3V at 500 mA, running or charging. The
circuit diagram on xgistor seems to indicate there's just a 4.7 Ohm
resistor keeping the bus from being completely battery-limited.
That said, the battery pack definitely contains 3 Ni-Cad cells, each
typically around 1.1 or so V. (I have had mine apart, rebuilt with
stock Ni-Cads, ond not fried anything.) Therefore 3.3 V to the
electronics makes good sense.
One thing I would *not* do would be to plug in the calculator without
a good battery pack in place, based on the circuit diagram and on
Tony's advice pertaining to the dire consequences of similar actions
with HP calculators.
FWIW, there is one more factor in the story. TI made a printer base
(PC-100?) that you could place the calculator (TI-58, -58C, or -59)
on to generate printouts. The method of connection was to take out
the battery pack, and place the cavity that it just vacated over a
protrusion on the face of the printer, which would then expand to
lock the calculator into place. (There was also a compartment to put
the battery pack into so it could charge while you printed.) Whatever
the power supply in that doohickey was, it circumvented the battery
completely. If anyone has one of those and could measure the voltage
on its power pins, that would likely shed lots of light on what the
calculator expects. (Sadly, mine went at a garage sale while I was
away from home.)
--
Mark Tapley, Dwarf Engineer
(I haven't cleared my neighborhood)
210-379-4635 Dwarf Phone, 210-522-6025 Office Phone
>From time to time, I've wondered about riviting whenever I come across a
piece of computer cabinet metal that has rivits that have come loose or
fallen out. The current case in point is the tilt latch on an 11/44 when
it's in the 11X44-CA configuration (it's in the top of the rack, and tilts
up on gas pistons). There is a little latch on the side (best way I can
describe it is a metal rectangle cut on a diagonal) which is spring metal.
You pull this latch in from the front with a pen or screwdriver, and it then
clears the tab on the outer rack so it can tilt up. At the very back of this
spring metal latch is a rivet holding it in place. This rivit has come
loose. You can really only get to one side of it, that's when the cpu
chassis is tilted up. I believe that in other (more common) rackmount
configurations of the /44 when it's on slides that telescope out the front,
this same latch is present but it's used to allow the cpu to slide forward
rather than tilt up.
I've seen riviters working on F18's at Boeing, and it sure appears to be a
higher art form. Not sure it's something I could do, but thought I'd ask
here. I've seen all kinds of rivits - different sizes - on an H960 I believe
there are a couple? Anyways, what tools are required, where can one get
rivits, what different types are there, and is it something a neophyte like
me who has never done a rivit before can do? I'm looking for the basic intro
to replacing a rivit for someone who has never done it.
Jay West
Another of the interfaces I purchased is called an HP11284 data
communications interface, it's part of the 11285 datacomms option (which
also included firmware ROM modules for the HP9830).
Anyway, this thing is complicated. It's 2 modules that plug into the 9830
I/O slots, each contains a PCB. One is stuffed with TTL and RS232 buffers
(1488s and 1489s), the other has more TTL and 4 custom ICs. 2 20 pin ones
(no idea) and 2 40 pin ones (maybe transmitter and receiver logic).
The modules are linked by a cable, there's another cable from the first
PCB I mentioned to the podem (or whatever). It ends in a 36 pin
microribbon connector, I believe there was another cable which I don't
have that connected to that and which ended in a pair of DB25 plugs, one
for the RS232 signals to the modem, ther other carrying RS336 signals to
an aautodialler.
My first question is simple. Does anyone have this interface with that
last cable and could 'buzz out' the connections so that I can make said
cable, and/or figure out a little of the internal hardware?
-tony
Well, the subject: line says it all really, but I'd better explain if
only to avoid the 'You should be able to figure it out for yourself' (I
could, if I have the drive) and the 'Most of it's the same as the drive
in an HP9830' (it is, but it's the different bits I am interested in)
type of replies.
I've bought a few interfaces for the HP98x0 series of 'calculators' [1].
One of them is the interface for said tape drive, it's a single PCB
containing about 10 TTL chips. What I am looking for, though, is a pinout
of the interface connector on the drve iteslf so I have some idea what to
expect on the end of this interface's cable.
[1] They're called 'calculators' to get past the purchasing depatrments
of the time. They're really computers -- the 9830 in particular
programmed in BASIC, has an alphanumeric display and supports HPIB and I
believe a hard disk. Other machines in the family (9810 and 9820) are
more like calculators, but haev the same bit-serial 16 bit proceessor, etc.
-tony
We are looking for documentation on HP 500 Series BASIC software. Our
immediate need is to learn the syntax of the MSI (Mass Storage Is)
statement. Unfortunately, the form of the statement is not the same as with
HP RMB or 9845 BASIC (we've tried those).
Jon Johnston
HP Computer Museum
http://www.hpmuseum.net
Should be TSB and IPL
Bob,
TSB assumes that it is the OS, so it is assuming that it ?owns? all of
its peripherals, DMA and the Interrupt system as well. As long as these
false assumptions are accounted for under IPL I would think that a
single CPU TSB such as TSB E may run without many problems.
The real problem comes with dual processor configurations of TSB.
Ether processor can initiate communication to the other, although
the Main is generally the one ?Calling the shots?. Ether way, they
assume that their partner is listening attentively, and they don?t
have much tolerance for a sluggish response.
If ether one gives up on the other the result is DEATH.
Under SIMH we had problems getting the timing right between the two
virtual processors, but it does work, and on some platforms it still
needs tweaking.
On real hardware if you stop all user activity, you can get away with
halting the Main processor, exploring memory from the front panel and
pressing Run without causing a crash. But if any terminal were to strike
a key while the Main was halted the IOP would give up on the main and die,
when the main came back the IOP would be dead, so the Main would die too.
If you try to halt the IOP with the system running the result is always
death. I think that it may be the result of a lost clock interrupt,
because we see the same thing under SIMH.
TSB is rather particular about addresses of it IO devices, so running
both processors on the same CPU may take a bit of creativity when allocating
devices. The IOP of Access would give you the most flexibility, but it?s
still rather strict.
On the 2100 version of Access the IOP microcode went into the same sockets
as the Main Processor?s floating point microcode so they were mutually
exclusive and both required, but on the 21MX versions I think that was
changed. So it may be possible to have both floating point instructions
and IOP instructions in the same CPU. Although I seem to recall that the
IOP instructions needed a stack pointer, and since they were not using
some register of the memory subsystem they just used that register for
the stack. I want to say that it was a ?memory fence register?, but I?m
not sure. And the IMS that describes it refers only to the 2100a/s
microcode, so I really don?t know what they did in the MX microcode.
It?s possible that the IOP microcode for MX may interfere with something that
IPL is counting on and Jay, Al, or Bob may be the best people to speak
to that. Of course, this would only apply to real hardware, under SIMH
the instructions are simulated without the constraints of the real hardware.
It would be really cool if the interconnect kit (the channel between
the two processors) could be virtual through IPL and perhaps even cause
the change of context to running the other processor. The device drivers
in the IOP are well organized, but the Main Processor is not. Sometimes
it looks more like spaghetti code, with IO instructions all over the place
in seemingly unrelated routines. (I?m sure they did that because they had
both memory and CPU time constraints, ;-)
None the less, my hat?s off to them. The last version of HP2000 Access
had only one bug found in it that I am aware of. With that bug patched,
I don?t think any other bug has ever been found. I don?t think I shall
ever again see such perfection.
On the special boot strap loader issue for Access, I don?t see it being
a problem. We don?t use it or even load it under SIMH. We just let SIMH
load the second half of the bootstrap paper tape image in low memory of
the Main processor and start it. We also let SIMH load the whole image
of a preconfigured IOP and start that. Sure someone could change the
SIMH startup scripts to be absolutely true to the recommended boot
procedures, but then again, a lot of these short cuts were well known back
in the day of real production systems and we are trying to boot the system
with minimal operator intervention.
TSB E sounds like the place to start. Then I would try Access on two CPUs
then each running under IPL. And finally Access with both running on
the same CPU.
If you decide to run tests with IPL and TSB under SIMH I would also caution
that the simulated interconnect between the two processors has only
(as far a I know) been working under Windoz. I think it has something to do
with the ?Socket Connect? library code, which last I checked was only used
by this device. Some day some other device may use it, and someone may take
the time to fix it. But for now we are just so happy to be able to run dual
CPU TSB that we put up with running it on Windoz.
The quickest way to boot up a TSB E system is under SIMH. The URL for the
ZIP is in the links section of the HP2000 Yahoo Group. The binaries are images
of original HP paper tapes (Thanks, Al and Jeff), so they should be quite
useable on real hardware if ported to a suitable media.
Hope this helps,
Mike Gemeny
Jay West wrote:
> I've seen riviters working on F18's at Boeing, and it sure appears to be a
> higher art form. Not sure it's something I could do, but thought I'd ask
> here. I've seen all kinds of rivits - different sizes - on an H960 I believe
> there are a couple? Anyways, what tools are required, where can one get
> rivits, what different types are there, and is it something a neophyte like
> me who has never done a rivit before can do? I'm looking for the basic intro
> to replacing a rivit for someone who has never done it.
There's a type of rivit called a pop rivit that I've used before. I get the impression
that it's not as good a the sort used in manufacturing, but for this kind of
purpose, I'd think it would do fine. The basic tool is a squeeze handle device.
You take a rivit that has a shaft running trough it similar to a finishing nail
with a bulge on the inside end of the rivit. You put the shaft into the riviting
tool and insert the rivit into the hole. When you squeeze, it pulls the "nail"
inward and the bulge streches a cylindrical part of the rivit pressing it against
the back side. Then the tool cuts the "nail" and the two pieces are tossed.
What's left is the rivit pressed in place. I think most tool shops carry these
as well as supplies of the rivits.
BLS
I have the top panel of an 11X44 that is pretty scuffed up and needs some
paint. That's the white/beige/creame color on the DEC "corporate cabinets"
(not H960's). It is also the same color as the front of an RL01, RL02, RAxx,
etc. Before someone says "just mount the RL0x at the top", that wouldn't be
appropriate since this is an 11X44 configuration (11/44 cpu at the top with
a full length door under it that has an opening for two TU58 tapes). The
scuffs on the top panel are pretty bad so just a "paint stick" type of
approach won't help. I'm going to be looking at wax & grease remover,
sanding, self-etching primer, chipguard, and paint. What fun.
In addition, I also have a lot of tiny touchup spots on various boxes -
mostly the front of RL0x's - that needs just a tiny "paint stick" type of
approach.
So I took the panel into a metal paint shop in town well known for their
expertise to see about getting the paint matched. They said that since the
top is textured, the peaks & valleys will look brighter/darker and thus you
can't put a piece like that on one of those optical scanners and get a good
color match. They said it may give a starting point but it'd have to be
matched by hand (eye) because of the type of textured surface the panel has.
To come up with an exact match paint (done by hand/eye), I could get a quart
for $50.00 USD. Then from that quart I could have spray cans made (they put
custom paint in spray cans) at $7.00 each. I would envision having perhaps a
can or two made for spraying, and leave the rest in the quart container for
"paint stick" type of touchups - when there's a small scratch that just
needs to be dabbed with a matchstick, etc.
Since I know absolutely NOTHING about paint/painting, I wanted to toss this
out on the list to see if what this place is suggesting sounds right, and if
the prices seem reasonable. If so, then I also wanted to offer some spray
cans of the paint to other listmembers to help defray the cost for myself. I
know that one can probably buy a color that is sortof close right off the
shelf, but I'd rather have an exact match...
Thoughts?
Jay West
> Is rivit a US variation or a typo? (it's 'rivet' this side of the pond)
You should probably put your money on typo. Checking with
google seems to confirm that.
> Anyhoo... agreed that for this kind of work it should be fine. The tool needed
> should cost virtually nothing (I'd certainly expect it to be less than $10US)
> and is really easy to work with.
While I was checking the spelling, I notice that wikipedia mentions
another name for pop rivets is blind rivets.
> I've always wondered how the massive rivets on ships are put in, in particular
> how on earth they get them to also be watertight around the hole!
I normally can't think that hard on a Friday :-)
BLS
At 11:30 -0600 1/12/07, George Currie wrote:
>Someone in San Antonio has 45+ IIe's plus accessories for sale. Here is
>the url for his Craigslist ad:
>
>http://austin.craigslist.org/sys/261497853.html
>
Wow. Almost a supercomputer of Apple-IIe's, if only we had the networking. ;-)
I'm in San Antonio. I have an Apple-II, and don't have the skills to
be in the computer-refurb/sales business, so I'll pass on this for
myself, but if help is needed with pickup or shipping, let me know.
--
Mark Tapley, Dwarf Engineer
(I haven't cleared my neighborhood)
210-379-4635 Dwarf Phone, 210-522-6025 Office Phone
Hi,
I recently received my new PDP-8/A that I bought on eBay.
The good news is that it arrived in useable condition, and
comes with a 10Mb disk drive (Shugart 4004) and high-speed
paper tape reader.
The bad news seems to be that the software is all specific
to the machine's former life as a CNC machine controller
(MM180).
The configuration seems to start with a standard 8/E cpu
with EAE in the 8/A chassis with 32K of memory and the
usual option cards. But for the disk and tape (which were
the exciting parts, for me), there is a 3-card set with a
6800 on it that controls the disk, the paper tape reader,
the CNC servos, and a bunch of other stuff. Effectively,
all the non-console I/O is given over to the 6800 as a
kind of I/O processor.
Anyone have any experience with these? The 6800 board is
KT (Kearney & Trecker) 1-20410, the board with the PIO chips
is KT 1-20411, and the disk interface board is KT 1-20666.
Thanks,
Vince
I got a TI 58-c calculator a while back but there was no transformer
with it... I was hoping someone would have one and could give me the
specs on it and if it plugs into the calculator in either rotation...
thanks, bob laag
Hello, Jay, especially, but any other HP types,
Well, I went and did it. I am now the proud owner of an HP-2117F,
if I can identify it correctly, shown here:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320067174880
... and, FPU, shown here:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320067174671
My experience with the HP 1000 series machines is, almost
exclusively, programming them in TSB on HP-200B, C, and F systems, many
moons ago. Jay, you seem to be an alpha geek when it comes to HP iron.
(A term of respect, no offense intended...) So, could you look at the
above auctions, and tell me what I need to make a good system.
Obviously, a disk system comes to mind... but, if you could be
specific, I would appreciate it. Also, what are the chances of this
being a suitable machine to run Time-Share BASIC, or TSB? I imagine I
would need microcode boards or ROM for the microcode boards already
there, but, for all I know, it already *IS* a TSB machine. Thanks for
your consideration.
Peace,
Warren E. Wolfe
wizard at voyager.net
>Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:10:26 -0800
>From: BOB LAAG <RLAAG at PACBELL.NET>
>I got a TI 58-c calculator a while back but there was no transformer
>with it... I was hoping someone would have one and could give me the
>specs on it and if it plugs into the calculator in either rotation...
>thanks, bob laag
If the TI 58-c is the same or similar to the old TI-58 which was the
same as the TI-59 but without the card reader and half the memory,
then it is TI Model AC-9131, 3.3VAC 500mA.
In other words, the above AC adapter is for a TI-59 ca. 1979.
It shouldn't matter which way it's connected, because it is an AC
adapter. Inside the battery compartment of the TI-59 you can see
the four diodes of the bridge rectifier.
Jeff Walther
Chuck Guzis wrote:
There used to be a "rattle can" textured finish that deposited
various-sized blobs of differently-colored paint. I wonder if this
might be a close texture (used as an undercoat).
When repairing fiberglass-resin cases, a bit of foam rubber (such as
that used to pack old hard drives) works pretty well for giving
things a fine texture.
Cheers,
Chuck
-----------------------------------
And these days, you can get a spare can of almost any texture you want at
Home Depot or Lowe's. I've tried some of the "orange peel" with good
results to match the old crackle texture.
I agree it's not the best but it is hard to pick out without very close
examination. So far, no problems with it coming off either (knock on wood!)
Billy