Hi,
> As far as I can tell from the crappy, low resolution pictures
>he's got, it probably isn't missing any boards.
I've never seen the inside of an 11/780, and as you say, the pictures are
terrible....
TTFN - Pete.
Hi
As with many things the answer is very simple.
The key is a program called LANCP invoked as $MCR LANCP on the boot
server.
It allows you to associate a name say VAX300 with a MAC address and add
it to a database.
It also allows you to set the name of the file to download and the root
of the system.
So far so good....
Now for the other half of the puzzle. How does the boot server listen
for requests?
Well there's an executable program call LANACP that is invoked by
running LAN$STARTUP.COM Once running it services boot requests from
across the network.
It uses the data from the data base maintained by LANCP.
It gives progress messages when a Node tries to boot.
Once you have done that then, from the target system type >>>Boot EZA0:
(ie the ethernet device on the target system) Lo and behold it downloads
the file.
It may well be the case that clusters use this system to boot satellite
systems but you do not have to be a cluster to use it. We are not trying
to make a cluster here. We are trying to boot a system that has empty
disk drives.
When I worked at DEC we were always warned that whilst .com files were
very powerful things never to use them unless we understood what every
line did.
Further more each command line should be tested by entering it manually.
I can now download a file to a target system just by typing Boot EZA0 at
the >>> prompt.
No Decnet, No Tcpip, No Clusters.
The firmware on a VAX is independent of operating systems be they
System or Network.
Rod Smallwood
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Antonio Carlini
Sent: 03 June 2007 19:52
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts';
cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: Cluster Booting - What they dont tell you.
Rod Smallwood wrote:
> We can rule out @SYS$MANAGER:CLUSTER_CONFIG_LAN which expects Decnet
> and screw's up TCPWARE.
>
> I'm out of ideas at this point.
> Lessons
>
> 1. Never run a .COM file before looking to see what it
does.
cluster_config*_LAN*.com? You aren't meant to run that are you?
At least, I've never done it that way. I've just attached a sample of
invoking @SYS$MANAGER:CLUSTER_CONFIG.COM on my VAX.
If you never at least entered the MAC address of your satellite VAX then
you definitely ran the wrong procedure! I thought you had V6.2 - the
LANACP stuff popped in V7 sometime, for those who didn't want to install
DECnet-Plus.
I would expect the procedure (if you run the right one) to do the right
thing (but I don't have a VAX with that config around to check right
now).
One other thing:
> DEFINE NODE VAX300/ADDRESS=08-00-2B-18-BB-D0/FILE=APB_061.EXE
Before you go to far down this path, this is used to boot an Alpha from
an InfoServer (or at least that's what I think it is, my infoserver
isn't in use right now). So I don't think this is what you want.
CLUSTER_CONFIG.COM should as a few questions, set a bunch of stuff up
and then wait for you to boot your VAX 4000-300. There's no way that you
are expected to delve this deep into this stuff if you run the right
procedure.
Antonio
KRAKAR::SYSTEM> @cluster_config
Cluster Configuration Procedure
Executing on a VAX System
This system is running DECnet-Plus.
DECnet will be used for MOP downline loading.
To ensure that this procedure is executing with the required
privileges, invoke it from the system manager's account.
Enter a "?" for help at any prompt. If you are familiar with
the execution of this procedure, you may want to mute extra
notes
and explanations by invoking it with "@CLUSTER_CONFIG BRIEF".
KRAKAR is a VAX system and currently a member of a cluster
so the following functions can be performed:
MAIN MENU
1. ADD a VAX node to the cluster.
2. REMOVE a node from the cluster.
3. CHANGE a cluster member's characteristics.
4. CREATE a duplicate system disk for KRAKAR.
5. MAKE a directory structure for a new root on a system disk.
6. DELETE a root from a system disk.
7. EXIT from this procedure.
Enter choice [1]:
This ADD function will add a new VAX node to the cluster.
WARNING: If the node being added is a voting member, EXPECTED_VOTES
for
every cluster member must be adjusted. For complete
instructions
check the section on configuring a cluster in the "OpenVMS
Cluster Systems" manual.
CAUTION: If this cluster is running with multiple system disks and
common system files will be used, please, do not proceed
unless appropriate logical names are defined for cluster
common files in SYLOGICALS.COM. For instructions, refer to
the "OpenVMS Cluster Systems" manual.
Do you want to continue [N]? y
For additional networking information, please refer to the
DECnet-Plus Network Management manual.
What is the node's DECnet fullname? LOCAL:.TEST What is the SCS node
name for this node [TEST]?
Do you want to define a DECnet synonym [Y]?
What is the synonym name for this node [TEST]?
What is the MOP service client name for this node [TEST]?
What is the node's DECnet Phase IV address? 1.98 Will TEST be a
satellite [Y]?
WARNING: When the new node is a satellite, the network databases on
KRAKAR are updated by this procedure. You must see to it
that
the network databases on all other cluster members are
updated.
On every boot node that may provide MOP service to the new
satellite, also make certain SYS$MANAGER:NET$LOGICALS.COM
contains the command:
$ DEFINE NET$STARTUP_MOP TRUE
For help, refer to the "OpenVMS Cluster Systems" manual.
Does TEST need to be registered in the namespace [N]?
Verifying circuits in network database...
What is the Cluster Alias fullname?
Note:
KRAKAR has 1 LAN circuit(s) in the ON state, with service enabled.
This procedure will establish circuit CSMACD-0 for KRAKAR's booting
of TEST.
What is TEST's LAN adapter hardware address? 08-00-2b-00-00-01
This procedure will now ask you for the device name of TEST's system
root.
The default device name (DISK$OPENVMS071:) is the logical volume
name of
SYS$SYSDEVICE:.
What is the device name for TEST's system root [default
DISK$OPENVMS071:]?
What is the name of TEST's system root [SYS10]?
Allow conversational bootstraps on TEST [N]?
The following workstation windowing options are available:
1. No workstation software
2. DECwindows Workstation Software
3. VWS Workstation Software (not installed)
Enter choice [1]:
Creating directory tree SYS10 ...
%CREATE-I-CREATED, $1$DKA0:<SYS10> created %CREATE-I-CREATED,
$1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSEXE> created %CREATE-I-CREATED, $1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSLIB>
created %SET-I-ENTERED, $1$DKA0:<000000>VMS$COMMON.DIR;1 entered as
$1$DKA0:<SYS10>SYSCO MMON.DIR; %CREATE-I-CREATED,
$1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSTEST> created %CREATE-I-CREATED,
$1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSMAINT> created %CREATE-I-CREATED,
$1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSMGR> created %CREATE-I-CREATED, $1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSHLP>
created %CREATE-I-CREATED, $1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSHLP.EXAMPLES> created
%CREATE-I-CREATED, $1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSUPD> created %CREATE-I-CREATED,
$1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSMSG> created %CREATE-I-CREATED, $1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSERR>
created %CREATE-I-CREATED, $1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYSCBI> created
%CREATE-I-CREATED, $1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYS$STARTUP> created
%CREATE-I-CREATED, $1$DKA0:<SYS10.SYS$LDR> created %CREATE-I-CREATED,
$1$DKA0:<SYS10.MOM$SYSTEM> created
System root SYS10 created
Will TEST be a disk server [N]?
Updating network database...
On all other boot nodes which may provide MOP DLL service to
TEST, execute the following command:
$ @SYS$MANAGER:NET$CONFIGURE "ALS_CONFIGURE" "ADD_CLIENT" -
_$ "SYS$SYSROOT:[SYSMGR]clu20200205.tmp3" "TEST"
"08-00-2B-00-00-01" "1.
98" -
_$ "DISK$OPENVMS071:<SYS10.>"
Configuration last run by SYSTEM on 28-JAN-1999 10:11:34.08
Node 0 MOP Client TEST
at 2007-06-01-19:36:34.760+01:00Iinf
Node 0 MOP Client TEST
at 2007-06-01-19:36:34.860+01:00Iinf
Characteristics
Addresses =
{
08-00-2B-00-00-01 ,
AA-00-04-00-62-04 (1.98)
}
Node 0 MOP Client TEST
at 2007-06-01-19:36:34.870+01:00Iinf
Characteristics
Tertiary Loader =
{
sys$system:tertiary_vmb.exe
}
Node 0 MOP Client TEST
at 2007-06-01-19:36:34.880+01:00Iinf
Characteristics
System Image =
{
"@net$niscs_laa(DISK$OPENVMS071:<SYS10.>)"
}
Node 0 MOP Client TEST
at 2007-06-01-19:36:34.890+01:00Iinf
Characteristics
Verification = '0000000000000000'H
Node 0 MOP Client TEST
at 2007-06-01-19:36:34.890+01:00Iinf
Characteristics
Phase IV Host Name = KRAKAR
Node 0 MOP Client TEST
at 2007-06-01-19:36:34.900+01:00Iinf
Characteristics
Phase IV Host Address = 1.150
Node 0 MOP Client TEST
at 2007-06-01-19:36:34.910+01:00Iinf
Characteristics
Phase IV Client Name = TEST
Node 0 MOP Client TEST
at 2007-06-01-19:36:34.910+01:00Iinf
Characteristics
Phase IV Client Address = 1.98
%NET$CONFIGURE-I-MODCHECKSUM, checksumming NCL management scripts
modified by NE T$CONFIGURE DELETE
SYS$SPECIFIC:[SYSEXE]NET$CHECKSUM_NCL_LOCAL_SAVED.DAT;12 ? [N]: y DELETE
SYS$COMMON:[SYSEXE]NET$CHECKSUM_NCL_COMMON_SAVED.DAT;12 ? [N]: a
%PURGE-I-NOFILPURG, no files purged
sys$manager:net$dns_clerk_startup.ncl changed to use the new default
namespace.
Your default namespace nickname is LOCAL.
Your default namespace NSCTS is
08-00-2B-0D-C0-9D-5F-FA-A9-88-43-46-95-00.
Clearing old local namespace entries prior to loading new entries
Loading new local namespace node name entries Saving the new local
namespace contents
Maximum number of node names that can be loaded: 190
Number of node names that are currently loaded: 4
%NET$CONFIGURE-I-CONFIGCOMPLETED, DECnet-Plus for OpenVMS configuration
complete d Size of pagefile for TEST [RETURN for AUTOGEN sizing]?
A temporary pagefile will be created until resizing by AUTOGEN. The
default size below is arbitrary and may or may not be appropriate.
Size of temporary pagefile [10000]?
Size of swap file for TEST [RETURN for AUTOGEN sizing]?
A temporary swap file will be created until resizing by AUTOGEN. The
default size below is arbitrary and may or may not be appropriate.
Size of temporary swap file [8000]?
Will a local disk on TEST be used for paging and swapping (Y/N)?
ERROR: Invalid response. Please enter (Y,N or ?).
Will a local disk on TEST be used for paging and swapping (Y/N)?
ERROR: Invalid response. Please enter (Y,N or ?).
Will a local disk on TEST be used for paging and swapping (Y/N)?
ERROR: Invalid response. Please enter (Y,N or ?).
Will a local disk on TEST be used for paging and swapping (Y/N)? y Does
TEST have any RFxx disks [N]? y Enter a value for TEST's ALLOCLASS
parameter [1]:
This procedure will now wait until TEST is a member of
the cluster. Once TEST joins the cluster, this procedure
will ask you which local disk it can use for paging and swapping.
Please boot TEST now. Make sure the default boot device is
set to be the LAN device appropriate for the satellite. See the
hardware user manual or the console help command for instructions
to do this.
Waiting for TEST to boot...
Waiting for TEST to boot...
Just found this on ebay.co.uk:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Vintage-Xerox-terminal-for-the-Star-Office-System-1980
s_W0QQitemZ280119650017QQihZ018QQcategoryZ4193QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZV
iewItem
Could this be used as a terminal for anything other than a Xerox Star Office
System? I?m on the lookout for a quirky terminal for my unix boxen....
-Austin.
>Hi Joshua
>It seems like you are the person to ask. I did some calculations showing
>that one would need a large area of PC boards covered with gold to
>get to an ounce ( w/ typical plating ).
>About how much gold would you expect to recover in 100 lbs of
>average PC boards. My guess would put it in the 1/8 of an ounce
>or less. Surely not enough to pay $500 for a pile of boards.
>Dwight
Well certainly he is trying to rip you off, why else?
TBH, you usually dont handle such small amounts of salvage... to
offset costs we were dealing with 1000lbs or more of scrap. Im not
sure on the actual gold recovered, I didn't handle the precipitation
of the gold from solution, i handled the grunt work of smashing up
chips and stripping boards for the acid bath.
So if your actually looking to make profit in this field you need to
deal in scrap by the truckload
Josh
Hi,
Does anyone on this friggin list LOL LOL own a
Northstar Dimension? I'd like to know it's dimensions
(how quaint) and how much it weighs. I got a line on a
few, and want to help the dude get a carton for it and
all. Thanks so much.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
Your server (the VAX 4000-200) does have to be running DECnet. Er no it
doesn't and isn't. I attended a 1976 DEC engineering meeting where this
was discussed. It just my personal memory has a long access time.
Download and run was around long before Decnet was thought of.
There's no Decnet or any other normal network involved. I am also
beginning to suspect that the whole cluster thing is another GRH (Giant
Red Herring) Whats actually happening is an old diagnostic tool is being
used to download and run a program on a remote system to exclude the
disk drives from the test.
Rod Smallwood
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Antonio Carlini
Sent: 03 June 2007 17:31
To: 'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'
Subject: RE: Repairing the damage.
>I am beginning to wonder if everybody is talking and nobody is
>listening.
>The target machine is not running anything except low level firmware
That's how it works.
>The server has to respond to the request (Remember No Decnet and No
>Tcpip available) somehow or other.
Your server (the VAX 4000-200) does have to be running DECnet. MOP is
not technically part of DECnet but the MOP-handling software is started
as part of DECnet. (Actually, there is a another way with more recent
versions of OpenVMS, using the LANACP stuff but I assume you haven't
done this).
Maybe I've missed a message or to, but does your VAX 4000-200 have
DECnet (either Phase IV or DECnet-Plus) installed and running? It would
be very unusual if it didn't, but it is possible to install without it.
Antonio
arcarlini at iee.org
Works marginally on certain limited hardware (IP30, IP22, IP32,
IP27(Sort of)) NetBSD has slightly better hardware support. Support for
graphics is marginal at best (Newport and some IMPACT).
Go with IRIX, you'll be happier.
>
>Subject: Re: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
> From: Dan <ragooman at comcast.net>
> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 00:33:41 -0400
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only <cctech at classiccmp.org>
>
>Roy,
>
>Thanks for the input. I was thinking about including one with vertical
>rows and one with horizontal rows. That way you can have some flexibility.
>
>One of the recent options for the onboard power supply was to use a low
>dropout voltage regulator. This allowed boards to be installed in S-100
>systems which contained either the original S-100 specs or the IEEE-696
>specs. The latter have a lower power supply voltage on the
>backplane(translates to lower power consumption) which an ordinary 7805
>voltage regulator can't accept. These require at least a 10+ volts on
>the backplane just to get a regulated 5V output. The LO voltage
>regulators need only about 7V input to get a regulated 5v output.
Wrong data. The 7805/lm309/lm323 reguire only 8V. All of the older
3 terminal regulators must have a 2.7V differential to regulate.
The yabut, most of the S100 supplies were so poorly filtered that
at any load the ripple voltage was excessive and didn't meet the minimum
of 8V at the bottom of the ripple trough. A good example of that
was the early Altair 8800 before MITS upgraded the transformer.
With a 8A load the DC votage sat at 8.3V but the lowest voltage was
7.1V due to the AC ripple. Needless to say that ripple fould it's
way to the 5V rail as the regualtor didn't have enough head room to
regulate. The fix was a higher voltage transformer or much heaftier
filter caps or both.
>
>The original backplanes were only 2 layer and couldn't handle the
>current capacity. The local(distributed) voltage regulators were the
>only option. You need at least a 4 or 6 layer backplane with a separate
>copper layer for each voltage and then a layer for ground to have enough
>copper for all that current.
Seals made a decent proto card. Horizontally gridded for power, up to
four regulator pads one of which was for +12 (7812), plated though holes
both hole per pad and for power gridding (two sides).
Allison
>=Dan
>
>[ My Corner of Cyberspace http://ragooman.home.comcast.net/ ]
>
>
>
>Roy J. Tellason wrote:
>> Hmm, good question!
>>
>> I have currently only two S-100 systems, a Cromemco System 3 with problems in
>> the PersSci drive. The floppy that was in the drive when I got it had been
>> in there and run so long that you could see clearly through the track zero
>> location. :-) I have some data on this stuff somewhere, and it appears
>> that they're using incandescent bulbs for such stuff as index sensors and
>> such? And the Imsai, here.
>>
>> Got a Vector S-100 backplane too, that I've started to build, only I lack a
>> few parts. Most importantly the S-100 connectors themselves. :-(
>>
>> I also have a couple of prototyping cards, I *think* they're Vector as well,
>> but haven't done anything with 'em yet to come up with a preference. I guess
>> vertical rows makes more sense in terms of air flow for heat dissipation?
>> That for the heatsinks for sure, though a lot of systems I saw mention of
>> later on in the popular period for S-100 seemed to be inclined to put a
>> regulated switching power supply in place and simply jumper across the
>> regulator positions. I dunno, to me the distributed approach always made a
>> lot of sense.
>>
>>
************************************** Episode 1
***********************************
This is as far as I got to this morning:
I am beginning to wonder if everybody is talking and nobody is
listening.
************************************************************************
***************
* The target machine is not running anything except low level firmware
!!! *
* No DECNet No Tcpip No VMS - Nothing !!!! (It can't-disk drives
inoperable) *
************************************************************************
***************
However after wading around in sea of online manuals I think am
beginning to find out the things they don't tell you.
Given that there has to be some form of communication between the Boot
server and the target. Then what's left is this MOP thing.
As you can specify that the boot device is the ethernet adaptor (EZA0:
in this case) when you try to boot from the target system it must be
sending out some kind of request packet with an ID attached. It can't be
a node name or an IP address. There's no way tell it what they are!!
What it does know, is its MAC address which is hard encoded into the
interface.
The server has to respond to the request (Remember No Decnet and No
Tcpip available) somehow or other.
So what is it that runs on the server does not use Decnet or Tcpip and
can load images into the target machine?
We can rule out @SYS$MANAGER:CLUSTER_CONFIG_LAN which expects Decnet and
screw's up TCPWARE.
I'm out of ideas at this point.
Rod Smallwood
************************************** Episode 2
***********************************
More wading around in on line manuals ...
Then some light ....
The key is a program called LANCP invoked as $MCR LANCP
It allows you to associate a name say VAX300 with a MAC address and add
it to a database.
To do this it uses the DEFINE command.
DEFINE NODE VAX300/ADDRESS=08-00-2B-18-BB-D0/FILE=APB_061.EXE
This refered to as a NODE. Now the Boot server knows about the target
machine and its MAC Address.
So far so good....
Now for the other half of the puzzle. How does the boot server listen
for requests.
Well there's an executable program call LANACP that is invoked by
running LAN$STARTUP.COM
Once running it services boot requests from across the network.
It uses the data from the data base maintained by LANCP.
It gives progress messages when a Node tries to boot.
... and of course it works up to the point where it does not recognise
the file name to down load (I have not found out what thats called yet)
So..
1. Hands up all of you who knew this and did not mention it. -
Shame on you!!!
2. Hands up all of you that did not know this - Well, now you
do!!
3. For MOP read LANACP.
4. Whats the name of the file to be downloaded from boot server
to target to get VMS running on the target.?
Lessons
1. Never run a .COM file before looking to see what it
does.
2. Try and work out what needs to happen first.
Rod Smallwood
>
>Subject: Re: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
> From: woodelf <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 11:39:32 -0600
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>Al Kossow wrote:
>>
>> If you are doing a design with on-board regulators in the 21st
>> century, why not use integrated switching rather than linear
>> regulators?
>>
>> Heat dissipation will be MUCH lower if you do this.
the real problem was NOT the heat from the regulators but the
heat from the rest of the board. 8K of 2102 memory produces
a lot of heat and a box with 8 of them needed a good set of fans
to move that heat.
FYI: even the 2102LP parts were around 50mA each (512 *.05=25.6W)
and the more common parts were around 80-100mA. Add regulators and
that could easily total 40-60W of heat. Add a few IO, Floppy card
and CPU and now your cooking. If the drives are in the box add
fans accoringly.
Dont forget the average 8V bus PSU was (in a decent box) rated to
deliver that voltage at 25A (125W of 5V alone). Some boxes like
the Compupro and Intergrand had CVCC transformers that typically ran
hot as well. So the average S100 grate needed to move between 100
for a small system to as much as 500W of heat.
>True, but with the advent modern chips like CMOS I see that
>power consumption less of a problem. Is the proto-board
>for 8 bit S-100 or 16 bit S-100 as I remember some where the buss
>was upgraded for 16 bit processors? ( Can you say INTEL ? )
>If it where not for that fact, having De-codeing and buffer chips
>laid out as that would save some space rather than in the pro-type
>area.
CMOS will help, denser memories (even back then) really help.
Allison
>
>
>Subject: RE: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
> From: "Rod Smallwood" <RodSmallwood at mail.ediconsulting.co.uk>
> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:20:47 +0100
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
>
>Hi
> Thanks for the positive feed back. Needless to say like all standards
>S100 had different versions.
>For example the Northstar Horizion had some active components on the
>mother board.
The fact that the mother board had IO on it was a savings of a card or two
but made NO difference to S100 standards. The variation of standards
were around timing, use of some specific pins, how memory extension (>64k)
was done and the troublesome DMA.
>However if we look at a basic passive (other than power) back plane.
>What are the potential problems? Firstly the connectors are they
>available? They had two rows of fifty connections.
>Spacing pin to pin .125in. Mother board was thicker than the usual 1/16
>in for rigidity possibily 3/32 in.
>Card guides pretty standard but how high? Then the metalwork supporting
>the card guides.
Generally backplanes were passive and interchangeable excluding mechanical
differences that were generally small. Some however included termination
and that was a plus as S100 can ring badly.
>Possible Parts List
>
>1. Double sided S100 motherboard (Say twelve slots)
>2. Aluminium base plate drilled for backplane and card guide
>supports.
>3. Twelve double sided 2x50 edge connectors.
>4. Card guide support frame.
>5. Twenty four card guides.
>6. Nuts, bolts and screws etc.
An outercase..
Power supplies in the case.
Fans! Lots of fans!
Allison
>Rod Smallwood
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
>[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Dan
>Sent: 03 June 2007 12:59
>To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>Subject: Re: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
>
>Rod,
>
>I see what you mean. I'm just starting off small right now since it's
>mainly a hobby. It's mostly to support the existing vintage computers
>out there. I really don't know what the demand there is for a new S-100
>chassis. I suppose that might be a good kit to build with the right
>parts. I can look into this.
>
>=Dan
>
>[ My Corner of Cyberspace http://ragooman.home.comcast.net/ ]
>
>
>
>Rod Smallwood wrote:
>> Prototype boards are nice but whats really needed is an S100 card cage
>with back plane and PSU.
>> Its normal to build the foundations before the rest of the house!!
>>
>> Rod Smallwood
>>
>>
>
>
>
>Subject: RE: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
> From: "Rod Smallwood" <RodSmallwood at mail.ediconsulting.co.uk>
> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:24:30 +0100
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
>
>Hi
> 1. Where did you see all these crates. (I'm in the UK)
I'm not, New England USA.
> 2. Nice shiny new boards in old back planes ?
Once I run an old backplane through a wash it's pretty good looking.
Whats really needed is smaller backplanes in the range of 8 to 12
slots as most S100 crates wer 18-22 and large.
Of course you also need the power supply(s) and an enclosure.
So an old crate that may be missing boards is actually pretty handy.
Allison
>Rod
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Allison
>Sent: 03 June 2007 12:34
>To: cctech at classiccmp.org
>Subject: RE: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
>
>>
>>Subject: RE: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
>> From: "Rod Smallwood" <RodSmallwood at mail.ediconsulting.co.uk>
>> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:52:27 +0100
>> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only"
>><cctech at classiccmp.org>
>>
>>Prototype boards are nice but whats really needed is an S100 card cage with back plane and PSU.
>>Its normal to build the foundations before the rest of the house!!
>>
>>Rod Smallwood
>
>There are plenty of S100 crates around usually with boards missing or damaged.
>That is rarely a problem, Working bords to fill it or proto on are.
>
>Allison
>
>
>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
>>[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Roy J. Tellason
>>Sent: 02 June 2007 21:10
>>To: CCTECH
>>Subject: Re: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
>>
>>On Saturday 02 June 2007 10:26, Dan wrote:
>>> I've been working on a pcb design for a S-100 prototype board. I
>>> noticed a few people on the forums asking about this. I decided to
>>> make this since this is a big hobby of mine too(member-MARCH club). I
>>> based this design on a old prototype board I kept back from the S-100
>>> days. It's made by Electronic Control Technology.
>>>
>>> Here's a link to the picture
>>> http://pghvintage.home.comcast.net/p...otypeboard.jpg
>>> <http://pghvintage.home.comcast.net/pics/S-100/s-100_prototypeboard.j
>>> p
>>> g>
>>>
>>> There were several different styles made before--each with their own
>>> advantages. This prototype board(in pic) has the rows in a vertical
>>> pattern to allow 300mil and 600mil DIP packages. It also accommodates
>>> 2 voltage regulators. Then there were some which only had a grid of
>>> solder pads to allow any arrangement of 300mil and 600mil DIP packages.
>>>
>>> I like to ask everyone what their preference might be in the
>>> arrangement of the solder pads, eg: vertical rows, horizontal rows,
>>> grid, etc. If I get enough feedback, I can include 2 different styles.
>>> It's not much work to alter the design. I have a panel setup to
>>> include 2 pcb designs at the moment, and it can be any 2 kinds of
>>> S-100 designs. In the future, I like to setup a bigger panel to
>>> include several more S-100 designs.
>>>
>>> Since this is mainly a hobby for me, I thought I might help out and
>>> offer this service. I'm designing this from my home workshop and
>>> intend to make this an affordable hobby. In case anyone is
>>> interested, with enough orders(minimum 30) then I can offer these for only $15 each.
>>
>>Hmm, good question!
>>
>>I have currently only two S-100 systems, a Cromemco System 3 with problems in the PersSci drive. The floppy that was in the drive when I got it had been in there and run so long that you could see clearly through the track zero location. :-) I have some data on this stuff somewhere, and it appears that they're using incandescent bulbs for such stuff as index sensors and such? And the Imsai, here.
>>
>>Got a Vector S-100 backplane too, that I've started to build, only I
>>lack a few parts. Most importantly the S-100 connectors themselves.
>>:-(
>>
>>I also have a couple of prototyping cards, I *think* they're Vector as well, but haven't done anything with 'em yet to come up with a preference. I guess vertical rows makes more sense in terms of air flow for heat dissipation?
>>That for the heatsinks for sure, though a lot of systems I saw mention of later on in the popular period for S-100 seemed to be inclined to put a regulated switching power supply in place and simply jumper across the regulator positions. I dunno, to me the distributed approach always made a lot of sense.
>>
>>--
>>Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a critter that can be killed but can't be tamed. ?--Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
>>-
>>Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies.
>>--James M Dakin
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>Subject: RE: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
> From: "Rod Smallwood" <RodSmallwood at mail.ediconsulting.co.uk>
> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:52:27 +0100
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
>
>Prototype boards are nice but whats really needed is an S100 card cage with back plane and PSU.
>Its normal to build the foundations before the rest of the house!!
>
>Rod Smallwood
There are plenty of S100 crates around usually with boards missing or damaged.
That is rarely a problem, Working bords to fill it or proto on are.
Allison
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Roy J. Tellason
>Sent: 02 June 2007 21:10
>To: CCTECH
>Subject: Re: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
>
>On Saturday 02 June 2007 10:26, Dan wrote:
>> I've been working on a pcb design for a S-100 prototype board. I
>> noticed a few people on the forums asking about this. I decided to
>> make this since this is a big hobby of mine too(member-MARCH club). I
>> based this design on a old prototype board I kept back from the S-100
>> days. It's made by Electronic Control Technology.
>>
>> Here's a link to the picture
>> http://pghvintage.home.comcast.net/p...otypeboard.jpg
>> <http://pghvintage.home.comcast.net/pics/S-100/s-100_prototypeboard.jp
>> g>
>>
>> There were several different styles made before--each with their own
>> advantages. This prototype board(in pic) has the rows in a vertical
>> pattern to allow 300mil and 600mil DIP packages. It also accommodates
>> 2 voltage regulators. Then there were some which only had a grid of
>> solder pads to allow any arrangement of 300mil and 600mil DIP packages.
>>
>> I like to ask everyone what their preference might be in the
>> arrangement of the solder pads, eg: vertical rows, horizontal rows,
>> grid, etc. If I get enough feedback, I can include 2 different styles.
>> It's not much work to alter the design. I have a panel setup to
>> include 2 pcb designs at the moment, and it can be any 2 kinds of
>> S-100 designs. In the future, I like to setup a bigger panel to
>> include several more S-100 designs.
>>
>> Since this is mainly a hobby for me, I thought I might help out and
>> offer this service. I'm designing this from my home workshop and
>> intend to make this an affordable hobby. In case anyone is interested,
>> with enough orders(minimum 30) then I can offer these for only $15 each.
>
>Hmm, good question!
>
>I have currently only two S-100 systems, a Cromemco System 3 with problems in the PersSci drive. The floppy that was in the drive when I got it had been in there and run so long that you could see clearly through the track zero location. :-) I have some data on this stuff somewhere, and it appears that they're using incandescent bulbs for such stuff as index sensors and such? And the Imsai, here.
>
>Got a Vector S-100 backplane too, that I've started to build, only I lack a few parts. Most importantly the S-100 connectors themselves. :-(
>
>I also have a couple of prototyping cards, I *think* they're Vector as well, but haven't done anything with 'em yet to come up with a preference. I guess vertical rows makes more sense in terms of air flow for heat dissipation?
>That for the heatsinks for sure, though a lot of systems I saw mention of later on in the popular period for S-100 seemed to be inclined to put a regulated switching power supply in place and simply jumper across the regulator positions. I dunno, to me the distributed approach always made a lot of sense.
>
>--
>Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a critter that can be killed but can't be tamed. ?--Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
>-
>Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James M Dakin
>
>
>
>
>Subject: Re: Hazeltine 1400 info?
> From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:39:36 -0400
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only" <cctech at classiccmp.org>
>
>On Jun 2, 2007, at 1:28 PM, Richard wrote:
>>> I was working for Hazeltine terminals group at the time, one look
>>> at the
>>> 1400s and I left. There were a few things about it that suggested
>>> with
>>> better firmware it could be nice but didn't happen.
>>
>> That makes me wonder if new firmware could be created now? What uP
>> did it use to control the electronics?
>>
>> Its my first Hazeltine for my collection. And no, I don't expect I'll
>> actually be sitting at it doing coding :-P.
>
> I seem to recall the 1420 being built around the 8080. Not sure
>about the 1400, but I strongly suspect it's a very similar design.
>
It was 8048/9 not 8080. The 1500 series was 8080.
Allison
> -Dave
>
>--
>Dave McGuire
>Port Charlotte, FL
>
>From: "Dave Dunfield" <dave06a at dunfield.com>
>
> > > N = 1;
> > > A[N++] = N++;
> >
> > I'd expect that to evaluate to a[1]=2 and n winds up being 3. But I'm
>weird.
>
>This simple code snippet invokes "undefined behaviour" because:
>
> 'N' is modified twice within a single sequence block.
> 'N' is referenced within a sequence block separately from a modification
> occuring within the same sequence block.
>
>One might expect:
>
> N = 1
> Save address of A[1]
> ++N
> (address of A[1]) = 2
> ++N
>
>Which gives you the result you expected, however a compiler is free to
>perform the side effects occuring within a sequence block at any time it
>wishes, as long as it observes the charactistics of the operator causing
>the side effect. (ie: one instance of N++ cannot increment N before
>retrieving it's value, although the other instance of N++ could have
>incremented it).
>
Hi Dave
I'd expect it to evaluate the left side of the equation first before
determining the address. A[2]=1. Any other order would not make
sense. Algebraic equations do not read left to right. This causes
a sense of ambiguity but shouldn't. Where it wouldn't be clear
as to the result would be for the case:
A = (5*N++) + (6*N++)
But that only goes to show how poor this type of notation is for
defining sequence of execution. This is why I still think RPN notation
is much better for computer programming. This need not be a stack
language like Forth. It is concise. Events happen left to right. No special
rules. It isn't familar to what you learned in grade school but doesn't
take long to grasp.
Dwight
_________________________________________________________________
PC Magazine?s 2007 editors? choice for best Web mail?award-winning Windows
Live Hotmail.
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migrati…
Aren't VAXen similar enough to where you could drop the -300's disk in
the -200, install VMS (or dup from the -200's system disk), reinstall
the disk in the -300, key in the -300's licenses and AUTOGEN? I don't
know as much about VMS as I'd like to, but I've had the disk from a
3100/76 up on a 4000/200 to test functionality, and is seemed to work
fine.
I've been working on a pcb design for a S-100 prototype board. I noticed
a few people on the forums asking about this. I decided to make this
since this is a big hobby of mine too(member-MARCH club). I based this
design on a old prototype board I kept back from the S-100 days. It's
made by Electronic Control Technology.
Here's a link to the picture
http://pghvintage.home.comcast.net/p...otypeboard.jpg
<http://pghvintage.home.comcast.net/pics/S-100/s-100_prototypeboard.jpg>
There were several different styles made before--each with their own
advantages. This prototype board(in pic) has the rows in a vertical
pattern to allow 300mil and 600mil DIP packages. It also accommodates 2
voltage regulators. Then there were some which only had a grid of solder
pads to allow any arrangement of 300mil and 600mil DIP packages.
I like to ask everyone what their preference might be in the arrangement
of the solder pads, eg: vertical rows, horizontal rows, grid, etc. If I
get enough feedback, I can include 2 different styles. It's not much
work to alter the design. I have a panel setup to include 2 pcb designs
at the moment, and it can be any 2 kinds of S-100 designs. In the
future, I like to setup a bigger panel to include several more S-100
designs.
Since this is mainly a hobby for me, I thought I might help out and
offer this service. I'm designing this from my home workshop and intend
to make this an affordable hobby. In case anyone is interested, with
enough orders(minimum 30) then I can offer these for only $15 each.
please send any feedback.
=Dan Roganti
--
[ My Corner of Cyberspace http://ragooman.home.comcast.net/ ]
Hi,
I recently acquired an old Compaq SLT-286, but unfortunately, the power
supply was not given to me. So I had to find a way of making it work by
myself...
I tried to connect a + 12 Vdc to the power connectors that normally are
assigned to the battery. I put the ground on the most right pin, and a
+12V on the most left one. The two middle pins were left unconnected,
and of course, I removed the battery to avoid shortcuts. ( Ooops...when
I say left/right, it's when the computer's screen is facing me, keyboard
is removed, and the battery connector is located on the top/left corner
:-)
Like this :
+------------------+
| **** |
| ABCD |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
+------------------+
A : +12V D : GND BC : left unconnected
With this, the computers boots normally on the floppy drive, but refuses
to boot on the Hard drive. I obtain a 162 error message, inviting me to
run SETUP. Then, I tried to run the compaq "setup.exe" diagnostic
program, and I managed to see that my hard drive is perfectly recognized
!
So, could anyone tell me il if I missed something ? Is my +12 Vdc
connexion enough for powering the whole computer ?
Actually I find very surprising that the battery's power connector has
four pins, and I managed to do it work with only two :-(
Thanks for your help, guys !
Sincerely,
Fred.
Brand new DLTape straight out of the box!!
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of e.stiebler
Sent: 02 June 2007 23:09
To: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: Repairing the damage.
Rod Smallwood wrote:
> Back up did somebody say Back up.?
> The whole reason I attempted doing it this way is because despite the
> fact that both systems have TK 70 tape drives when attempting to do a
> backup on the -200 it keeps telling me the tape is write protected
> which it isn't.
Make sure it isn't a TK50 you put in the TK70, or formatted as TK50.
Probably switch the drives between the systems ?
Richard,
As most of group have mentioned that you need a support contract or
purchase the MIPSpro compilers (C, C++, F77, F90, Auto-
parallelization, GNAT Pro ADA 95) specifically for your host which
you intend to run on. The FlexLM license file is in /var/flexlm/
license.dat. You might want to check your IRIX workstation or
server you are doing your IRIX install on, and see if you already
have any licenses in this file. You might be surprised if your SGI
might have previously been licensed. You can print out or copy this
file for safe keeping. Upgrading within IRIX 6.5.x will not modify
this file.
You will need to contact your local sales office (http://www.sgi.com/
sales/ ) or call SGI at (800) 800-7441 or (650) 960-1980 if you need
a license. You will probably need a quote for a 2CPU license (even
if you are running on a 1 CPU workstation). Depending on the
version of IRIX, it did place some freebie licenses in there.
They also used to produce a "HotMix" CD with all the sample or open
license software. I believe I still have a lot of these HotMix
CDs from IRIX 5.3, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4.
I would suggest that you setup a free Supportfolio account and see
what you have access to. https://support.sgi.com/login SGI will
give you a 30 or 90 EVALUATION license for any software, so you can
try out the MIPSpro compilers and see if you want to go for the cost
of the software http://www.sgi.com/support/licensing/ . The
MIPSpro compilers really take advantage of the SGI architecture and
IRIX, more so than GNU software. But depending on what you need,
GNU compilers might be fine for what you are doing.
Some of the Development tools (http://www.sgi.com/developers/
technology/irix/tools.html more info) you can download and may get a
PERMANENT license for ANY host (HOSTID=ANY in license.dat).
You can download most of the available software (except compilers) at
http://www.sgi.com/products/evaluation/ It will note what type
of license (like FREE or no license needed).
Most of the stuff that might interest you are things like Cosmo
Player, Open Office, Message Passing Toolkit 1.9 and Parallel Virtual
Machine-PVM (I have PDF version of non-copyright books on PVM and MPI
if you need them), Java (1.4.1_06 which is NOT DST compliant without
a patch that they created from a bug report I placed, but should be
available from Supportfolio).
If you don't want to purchase the MIPSpro compilers, the GNU
compilers are available. All Freeware software is at http://
freeware.sgi.com/ and all the manuals/books are at Techpubs in HTML
and PDF format http://techpubs.sgi.com . C++ coding standard for
IRIX and GNU C++ are at http://www.sgi.com/tech/mlc/docs/cc-coding.ps
I suggest if you can get it, to install IRIX 6.5.22 or later. IRIX
6.5.30 is the latest. You can then install the DST (Daylight
Savings Time) patch for IRIX 6.5.22 to 6.5.30 (new patch for 6.5.30).
IRIX 6.5.2f to 6.5.21f (f for Feature set, m for maintenance) require
you to download a new tzdata file (from tp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/),
modify /etc/TIMEZONE, and run the zic compiler for your locale.
I can email you or provide you all this information if you need
it. I also wrote TONS of documentation for work on installing
IRIX, startup/shutdown procedures, backup procedures and I can send
that to you also.
I have expertise on IRIX 4.0, 5.3, 6.2,6.3,6.4 and 6.5.x on all kinds
of MIPS and SGI hardware from MIPS workstations, SGI Personal IRIS,
Indys, Indigos, O2s, Octanes, Crimsons, and Origin servers (200, 300,
3800). But I only have Indys, O2s, Octanes, Origin servers, and
maybe an Indigo Impact for me to use. Most of everything else was
upgraded or replaced.
Let me know if you need anything. I'd be happy to help you out.
-Darin
Hi
1. Where did you see all these crates. (I'm in the UK)
2. Nice shiny new boards in old back planes ?
Rod
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Allison
Sent: 03 June 2007 12:34
To: cctech at classiccmp.org
Subject: RE: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
>
>Subject: RE: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
> From: "Rod Smallwood" <RodSmallwood at mail.ediconsulting.co.uk>
> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:52:27 +0100
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic Posts Only"
><cctech at classiccmp.org>
>
>Prototype boards are nice but whats really needed is an S100 card cage with back plane and PSU.
>Its normal to build the foundations before the rest of the house!!
>
>Rod Smallwood
There are plenty of S100 crates around usually with boards missing or damaged.
That is rarely a problem, Working bords to fill it or proto on are.
Allison
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org
>[mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Roy J. Tellason
>Sent: 02 June 2007 21:10
>To: CCTECH
>Subject: Re: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
>
>On Saturday 02 June 2007 10:26, Dan wrote:
>> I've been working on a pcb design for a S-100 prototype board. I
>> noticed a few people on the forums asking about this. I decided to
>> make this since this is a big hobby of mine too(member-MARCH club). I
>> based this design on a old prototype board I kept back from the S-100
>> days. It's made by Electronic Control Technology.
>>
>> Here's a link to the picture
>> http://pghvintage.home.comcast.net/p...otypeboard.jpg
>> <http://pghvintage.home.comcast.net/pics/S-100/s-100_prototypeboard.j
>> p
>> g>
>>
>> There were several different styles made before--each with their own
>> advantages. This prototype board(in pic) has the rows in a vertical
>> pattern to allow 300mil and 600mil DIP packages. It also accommodates
>> 2 voltage regulators. Then there were some which only had a grid of
>> solder pads to allow any arrangement of 300mil and 600mil DIP packages.
>>
>> I like to ask everyone what their preference might be in the
>> arrangement of the solder pads, eg: vertical rows, horizontal rows,
>> grid, etc. If I get enough feedback, I can include 2 different styles.
>> It's not much work to alter the design. I have a panel setup to
>> include 2 pcb designs at the moment, and it can be any 2 kinds of
>> S-100 designs. In the future, I like to setup a bigger panel to
>> include several more S-100 designs.
>>
>> Since this is mainly a hobby for me, I thought I might help out and
>> offer this service. I'm designing this from my home workshop and
>> intend to make this an affordable hobby. In case anyone is
>> interested, with enough orders(minimum 30) then I can offer these for only $15 each.
>
>Hmm, good question!
>
>I have currently only two S-100 systems, a Cromemco System 3 with problems in the PersSci drive. The floppy that was in the drive when I got it had been in there and run so long that you could see clearly through the track zero location. :-) I have some data on this stuff somewhere, and it appears that they're using incandescent bulbs for such stuff as index sensors and such? And the Imsai, here.
>
>Got a Vector S-100 backplane too, that I've started to build, only I
>lack a few parts. Most importantly the S-100 connectors themselves.
>:-(
>
>I also have a couple of prototyping cards, I *think* they're Vector as well, but haven't done anything with 'em yet to come up with a preference. I guess vertical rows makes more sense in terms of air flow for heat dissipation?
>That for the heatsinks for sure, though a lot of systems I saw mention of later on in the popular period for S-100 seemed to be inclined to put a regulated switching power supply in place and simply jumper across the regulator positions. I dunno, to me the distributed approach always made a lot of sense.
>
>--
>Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a critter that can be killed but can't be tamed. ?--Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
>-
>Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies.
>--James M Dakin
>
>
>
-------------- Original message from "Glen Slick" <glen.slick at gmail.com>: --------------
> On 6/2/07, g-wright at att.net wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a HP 1000 21MX that wont bring up the Power supply. Has AC to it
> > and the fans come on. It has a some what different battery backup connections
> > on the rear than a 2117F. I tried the resister jumper from a 2117F but no
> go.
> > There is no voltage output from the PS on any leg. Is there something
> different about
> > these or do I need to trouble shoot the Power Supply
> >
>
> Is a 21MX a 2105A / 08A / 09A / 12A / 13A? My direct experience is
> limited to a 2113E and a 2117F (plus a 2100A that doesn't quite work
> at the moment).
>
> -Glen
The HP tag on the back says its a 2105A
- jerry
>
>So, how is the "open sourcing" or at least the "prying of the source
>code from HP's hands" going
>or MPE?
>Regards,
>Michael L Gueterman
>Integrated Information Systems, Inc.
>--
Will this machice run the same MPE/V as the smaller systems (IE 3000/42) ?
See ya, SteveRob
Prototype boards are nice but whats really needed is an S100 card cage with back plane and PSU.
Its normal to build the foundations before the rest of the house!!
Rod Smallwood
-----Original Message-----
From: cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctech-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Roy J. Tellason
Sent: 02 June 2007 21:10
To: CCTECH
Subject: Re: New pcb design for S-100 prototype board available
On Saturday 02 June 2007 10:26, Dan wrote:
> I've been working on a pcb design for a S-100 prototype board. I
> noticed a few people on the forums asking about this. I decided to
> make this since this is a big hobby of mine too(member-MARCH club). I
> based this design on a old prototype board I kept back from the S-100
> days. It's made by Electronic Control Technology.
>
> Here's a link to the picture
> http://pghvintage.home.comcast.net/p...otypeboard.jpg
> <http://pghvintage.home.comcast.net/pics/S-100/s-100_prototypeboard.jp
> g>
>
> There were several different styles made before--each with their own
> advantages. This prototype board(in pic) has the rows in a vertical
> pattern to allow 300mil and 600mil DIP packages. It also accommodates
> 2 voltage regulators. Then there were some which only had a grid of
> solder pads to allow any arrangement of 300mil and 600mil DIP packages.
>
> I like to ask everyone what their preference might be in the
> arrangement of the solder pads, eg: vertical rows, horizontal rows,
> grid, etc. If I get enough feedback, I can include 2 different styles.
> It's not much work to alter the design. I have a panel setup to
> include 2 pcb designs at the moment, and it can be any 2 kinds of
> S-100 designs. In the future, I like to setup a bigger panel to
> include several more S-100 designs.
>
> Since this is mainly a hobby for me, I thought I might help out and
> offer this service. I'm designing this from my home workshop and
> intend to make this an affordable hobby. In case anyone is interested,
> with enough orders(minimum 30) then I can offer these for only $15 each.
Hmm, good question!
I have currently only two S-100 systems, a Cromemco System 3 with problems in the PersSci drive. The floppy that was in the drive when I got it had been in there and run so long that you could see clearly through the track zero location. :-) I have some data on this stuff somewhere, and it appears that they're using incandescent bulbs for such stuff as index sensors and such? And the Imsai, here.
Got a Vector S-100 backplane too, that I've started to build, only I lack a few parts. Most importantly the S-100 connectors themselves. :-(
I also have a couple of prototyping cards, I *think* they're Vector as well, but haven't done anything with 'em yet to come up with a preference. I guess vertical rows makes more sense in terms of air flow for heat dissipation?
That for the heatsinks for sure, though a lot of systems I saw mention of later on in the popular period for S-100 seemed to be inclined to put a regulated switching power supply in place and simply jumper across the regulator positions. I dunno, to me the distributed approach always made a lot of sense.
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a critter that can be killed but can't be tamed. ?--Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James M Dakin
Hi
The abortive attempt to cluster the two Vaxes and copy data has left me
much further back than when I started.
The network and terminal server connections are gone because I can't
start TCPWARE up.
It complains about a license and and something called NETCU (What the
hell is that?) and aborts the loading of TCPWARE.
Lesson learned,= the boot from a cluster server idea is flawed and can
damage an existing setup.
Its probably one of those things everybody has heard about but never
actually done.
Back up did somebody say Back up.?
The whole reason I attempted doing it this way is because despite the
fact that both systems have TK 70 tape drives when attempting to do a
backup on the -200 it keeps telling me the tape is write protected which
it isn't.
I'll try to sort that one out to-morrow.
Rod