test-drb

test-drb@ccmp.vtda.org

101090 discussions

by jba＠sdf.lonestar.org

> VAXmate was a 286 clone, I forget if it was 100% pc or off by a little > from the PC AT. I used to have a VAXmate when it was actually in production, but it was just our home computer. It was 100% AT compatible, and ran just about everything fine DEC did skimp, however, on the graphics. It did not fully implement CGA. I beleive it would only display 8 monochrome shades, while CGA implemented a full 16 shades. While it was compatible with all CGA software, the display sometimes left something to be desired. The ridiculous form factor left something to be desired as well. I've never liked all-in-one designs. And the VAXmate's plastics and construction could best be described as "cheap." I think the idiotic door hiding the disk drive broke off after about a month of use. jba at sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org

18 years, 5 months

*updating* 8088's

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: Re: *updating* 8088's > From: Jim Leonard <trixter at oldskool.org> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:35:14 -0600 > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >Chris M wrote: >> --- Alexis <thrashbarg at kaput.homeunix.org> wrote: >> >>> You might run into an issue of minimum clock speed >>> too. I don't know what >>> the minimum for the 386/486 is. I know RISC >>> microcontrollers can go down to >>> DC, but the 8386/486 might not. Correct they are dynamic internally. The minimum clock is far slower than most would tolerate (under 1mhz). >> Presumably the boards these things come with have >> their own crystals. I would not expect a '486 upgrade >> for a '286 to run at 8mhz or anything comparable (but >> Tony could tell us). > >They did indeed. Which brings us to why these were stopgaps at best: >The processing may have been faster, but the memory/bus interface was >the same, so you were not truly getting the overall performance of the >real machine (that's why the advertised benchmarks were careful to >demonstrate how much faster the upgraded machine was compared to how it >was before, and NOT to a "real" 386). Some resorted to PLL chips top multiply the existing clock to something fast. Allison >-- >Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/ >Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/ >Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/ >A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/

18 years, 5 months

*updating* 8088's

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: Re: *updating* 8088's > From: "Ensor" <classiccmp at memory-alpha.org.uk> > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:49:26 +0000 > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >Hi, > > >....but the 8088/86 was available as high as 20mhz IIRC, > >or possibly even a bit higher.... > >Hmm, I don't ever recall seeing an XT running at anything like that sort of >speed. The higest teh 8088 got in PC or clone was 12mhz. The faster parts appeared later and for the embedded cpu market. >Most "Turbo XT" motherboards which I saw topped out at 10MHz, though I have >a vague recollection of hearing about a manufacturer which produced a 14MHz >(or possibly even 16MHz) board and then had to quickly withdraw it due to >MAJOR instability problems. the biggest problem with XT and fast was teh ISA-8 bus was 8Mhz max and many older cards would get unhappy at another over that. So you set the bios for lots of waits slowing the system. >If you wanted anything faster you generally had to go to a '286 or better. more or less th case. Allison > > TTFN - Pete.

18 years, 5 months

*updating* 8088's

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: Re: *updating* 8088's > From: Chris M <chrism3667 at yahoo.com> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:41:39 -0800 (PST) > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >"I ran a Leading Edge model D (PC XT clone) with an >Intel Inboard-386. >It gave me 2MB ram and a 16mhz CPU (beats 4.77!) and a >bottleneck of >the 8bit ISA. However it ran winders3.1 and was a >whole lot faster >than the 4.77mhz V20. At the time it was far cheaper >than a real 386 >and much better than the 8088." > > 3.1 needed at least a 386, no? Actualy no. However it was so crippled in that mode it was near useless. It was really 386 minimum. There was Win3.0 >(prolly same requirements) and Windows/286. This >wouldn't get you the ability to run any of the above, >but the 8088/86 was available as high as 20mhz IIRC, >or possibly even a bit higher. I don't know what the >'186 capped off at (40mhz at least). > I thought you didn't like throwaway PCs Allison. What >did you finally do with that box? Let me guess, you >threw it away LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL As a matter of fact I kept the Inboard and tossed the D. Allison > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ >Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. >Make Yahoo! your homepage. >http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

18 years, 5 months

Documentation for the AT&T Sceptre Videotex terminal

by chaosotter76＠gmail.com

I've just gotten my hands on a working AT&T Sceptre system, which is a 1983 Videotex terminal that implements the NAPLPS standard for vector graphics transmission (the same sort of graphics that was used by the Prodigy online service, if you remember that). It powers up fine and generates the welcome screen, which includes a "Press [Data] to login" message. Once you press [Data], the screen blanks, and I presume that it's trying to establish some sort of connection over the RS-232 port. I've just started poking at the thing and haven't gotten far, as I need to grab a null modem from elsewhere, but I thought there might be a chance that somebody out there has the documentation for one of these things. Through searching about, I'm fairly certain that it's hardwired to speak 1200/7E1 on the serial port, but what it's expecting to hear is the question. Just a stream of NAPLPS-encoded data? Or is there more negotiation to be done? I have at least found an online source for the NAPLPS encoding itself: http://netghost.narod.ru/gff/vendspec/naplps/naplps.txt

18 years, 5 months

Access to IOPAGE Registers using PDP-11 Opearting Systems

by bqt＠softjar.se

"Jerome H. Fine" <jhfinedp3k at compsys.to> skrev: > When I run under Ersatz-11, John Wilson allows > INSTALL EMEM.DLL > (this was under V3.1 of E11 and hopefully soon with EMEM32.DLL > under V5.1 of E11) to access many MegaBytes of PC memory via an > IOPAGE register. > > For example: > > BaseReg = 177100 > BaseRe2 = BaseReg+2 > BaseRe4 = BaseReg+4 > BaseRe6 = BaseReg+6 > Mov @#BaseReg,R0 ;Get the current value from PC memory > Mov R0,@#BaseReg ;Put the current value into PC memory > > BaseRe4 / BaseRe6 are used as a 32 bit address into the PC memory allocated > during the INSTALL process. > > Under RT-11, direct access to the IOPAGE (address above 160000) is > allowed even using VBGEXE by a reference to PREVIOUS DATA > space. I have written FORTRAN IV/77 interface subroutines to allow > a user to easily access that memory rather than use VIRTUAL arrays > which are much slower and have much less capacity. > > I doubt that RSX-11 or RSTS/E allow a user access to the IOPAGE > even via PREVIOUS DATA space. Can anyone confirm this assumption? > Is there any fast method (only a few extra instructions) that would allow > a user to reference a specific IOPAGE register from a user program? Are > VIRTUAL arrays allowed in FORTRAN under RSX-11? If so, how > is access to the MMU registers controlled and allowed? > > Johnny has helped with such RSX-11 questions in the past and the answers > were appreciated very much! You assume correctly, in that normal, unprivileged programs cannot normally access the I/O page on a mapped RSX system. There are some different answers to how to do this in RSX. I'll try to keep it short. First of all, we have unmapped and mapped RSX systems. Unmapped systems don't use the MMU, so obviously you can access the I/O page on those systems. When we get to mapped systems, it gets trickier. First of all, privileged programs normally do have access to the I/O page. It's mapped in at APR 7 in D-space, unless you explicitly don't want it (that's something you specify when you do the task build (linking in RT-11)). Second, RSX manages memory in the form of partitions. Programs can map in memory regions which are located in partitions, as long as they have the right access privileges (they are protected by a normal protection mask, just as files). The system manager can create a special partition, which maps onto the I/O page, and then user programs can map in that region anywhere in their programs, and thus have access to the I/O page that way, if they want to. Virtual arrays in FORTRAN is mapped to a file unless I remember wrong, which means they don't have anything to do with the MMU. However, in RSX you can manipulate and remap your address space from a program if you want to. There are services in RSX to do that in a controlled way. You attach to a memory region, and then you map whatever part of that region to whatever part of your virtual address space you want to. But as I said before, in order to get access to the I/O page in this case, the system manager must have created a region which is located in the I/O page, and which users are allowed access to. With all this said and done, the "normal" way in RSX is to have a privileged program. After all, fooling around in the I/O page is likely something that "normal" programs shouldn't do, and for which privileges are a sensible way of distinguishing if a program may. I can't really say for sure about RSTS/E, but I think it's atleast somewhat similar to RSX. Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

18 years, 5 months

cctalk Digest, Vol 51, Issue 62

by dm561＠torfree.net

-------------Original Message(s): Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:05:46 -0800 From: "Eric J Korpela" <korpela at ssl.berkeley.edu> Subject: Re: *updating* 8088's On Nov 20, 2007 5:34 AM, Cameron Kaiser <spectre at floodgap.com> wrote: > > > On the other hand, the 386SX could execute 32-bit code. That is, if > > > you had any to run in 1989. > > > > There was plenty of 32-bit code being written in 1989... just not for MS-DOS. > > What about games, DOS/4GW, ... ? I got my 386DX in 89. Very few, if any, MS-DOS games relied on 32bit extenders at that point. It cut out too much of the market that still had 16bit processors. It would have been nice not to push so hard to have 635k low memory free in order to run the latest game. The most used feature of the 386 was V86 mode, and it was mostly used to free up memory for 16bit MS-DOS programs. Eric ---------------Reply: And then there were the MMUs that gave your PC/XT/AT almost the entire 1MB for DOS, and up to 10MB or so of extended memory for running Unix, PC-MOS386 and the like on your XT (if you really wanted to)... m m

18 years, 5 months

VAXmate for Windows

by dgriffi＠cs.csubak.edu

I have seven 5.25" floppies labeled as RX33K which contain: VAXmate MS-Windows v1.03 (two disks) VAXmate Info System v1.1 VT240 Emulator Update VAXmate S/A Install v1.1 VAXmate MS-DOS v3.10 All of these are labeled "For VAXmate operating environment v1.1". I don't remember where it came from, but there's been some recent talk about VAXen. Who wants these? -- David Griffith dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

18 years, 5 months

Micropolis

by blstuart＠bellsouth.net

From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> > > > > > 3) What happens if you copy a -2G file to an otherwise almost full disk? > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Brian L. Stuart wrote: > > It gets you another 2 gig of space, of course. This is the > > ... > > But, what is the resistor color code for negative ohms? > (Octarine?) A pigment that reflects only infrared? BLS

18 years, 5 months

Micropolis

by blstuart＠bellsouth.net

> > 3) What happens if you copy a -2G file to an otherwise almost full disk? > > Beats me. It gets you another 2 gig of space, of course. This is the little secret of drive manufacturers. For the chip guys, it's the magic smoke. For the drive guys, they have the fabulous increases in capacity by copying files of negative size. They just want us to think it's a lot of hard work devising new ways of packing magnetic domains tighter. (Just in case the tounge-in-cheek nature fails to get throught: :-) BLS

18 years, 5 months

Museum in St. Louis?

by jwest＠classiccmp.org

"Appropriate Resources" in St. Louis may potentially be available to start a public Museum of Computation History.... there are discussions going on with people who could easily make it happen in any case, but it's far too early to say anything definite. One of the things I was asked as part of a what-if scenario - Could I anticipate that some collectors on this list would be willing to loan items on an extended term for such an effort? Only top notch museum quality pieces would be sought. We'd pay 100% of the costs to have it crated, shipped, insured, etc. and also full return costs. The length of the loan might be open-ended at your preference. Surely some of you have really nice items that you don't have room for and wouldn't mind it being stored elsewhere for a while so that the public can enjoy it. If anyone has such things, could you let me know off-list? I need to find out if enough artifacts are available, how much floor space may be needed, etc. Thanks! Jay West

18 years, 5 months

Fwd: [comp.sys.dec] four VT100 terminals free

by legalize＠xmission.com

This message has been forwarded from Usenet. To reply to the original author, use the email address from the forwarded message. Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:22:32 -0600 Groups: comp.sys.dec,comp.sys.dec.micro,alt.sys.pdp11,comp.os.vms From: "Lee K. Gleason" <lee.gleason at comcast.net> Subject: four VT100 terminals free Id: <ZvGdnUBzY_35td_anZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d at comcast.com> ======== I'm narrowing the scope of my collection (translation - no room for everything anymore). I have four VT100s, in pretty good shape, and a few additional extra keyboards as well. Free to whoever wants to pick 'em up in Houston Texas, near TC Jester & the North Loop. First come, first served.... -- Lee K. Gleason N5ZMR Control-G Consultants lee.gleason at comcast.net

18 years, 5 months

*updating* 8088's

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: Re: *updating* 8088's > From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:47:51 -0800 > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >On 19 Nov 2007 at 23:03, Allison wrote: > >> Actually it's teh other way around the 386 was more efficient than >> 286 for the same clock speed. > >In 16-bit mode, I seem to recall that the 386SX was a travesty of a >CPU; a 16 MHz SX ran nowhere near as fast as a comparably-clocked >286. Early 386 boxes were nothing to crow about in 16-bit mode--and >a 32-bit software base pretty much didn't exist early on--and the >386SX was limited to 16MB of external memory, just like the 286. Overall it was faster if the ISA bus was 16bits. problem was at that time the code had a lot of 8088 and 286isms in it so there was often no advantage other tha internally the 386 was bit faster. In practice and I have a SIIG 3000 box (386sx) with 5mb to test on the 386 was faster but going from 12 to 16 mhz is not a large increment. >Doubtless the 386SX board designs were low-budged also, which >probably figured into things. Some 286 vendors made a big thing of >the fact that a 286 could execute 16-bit real mode code substantially >faster than the 386SX. For example: Indeed. to save money in that still expensive ram there were a lot of wait states inserted to accomodate 85ns simms. That tended to sharply nullify any internal advantage. >http://www.intersil.com/data/an/an121.pdf > >On the other hand, the 386SX could execute 32-bit code. That is, if >you had any to run in 1989. ; there in lies the point. CPUs as we well know generally run ahead as Moore predicts with software lagging behind. However, in 1989 the 386 as a huge leap ahead and sometimes over the 286 that not every one had. I did that. I went from 8088/4.77mhz XT to INboard386/16 and from there to 486DX/33. However... I didn't "buy in" to the PC world until after the WWW as CP/M z80, PDP-11 and VAX wer faster, easier or on hand where the PC offered limited or no advantage. Allison >Cheers, >Chuck >

18 years, 5 months

What CBM Monitor is this?

by silent700＠gmail.com

I though I knew most of the CBM models, but I don't recognize this one: http://www.shopgoodwill.com/viewItem.asp?ItemID=3167507 I wrote to the seller and he gave me a part# from the back which returns nothing in Google.

18 years, 5 months

cctalk Digest, Vol 51, Issue 59

by dm561＠torfree.net

Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:44:19 -0600 From: "Jason T" <silent700 at gmail.com> Subject: What CBM Monitor is this? I though I knew most of the CBM models, but I don't recognize this one: http://www.shopgoodwill.com/viewItem.asp?ItemID=3167507 I wrote to the seller and he gave me a part# from the back which returns nothing in Google. ------------- Looks like my 1702 except for the colour... Isn't there a number on the front? m

18 years, 5 months

cctalk Digest, Vol 51, Issue 59

by dm561＠torfree.net

Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:58:13 -0800 (PST) From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> Subject: Micropolis (was: "intelligent" disk drives >Micropolis made excellent floppy drives. It is too bad that their hard >drives sucked. I guess I've just got some bad ones then; speed's all over the place on one (belt's OK) and another one stopped altogether; when they were still working a couple of months ago, read errors were pretty common, even with cleaned heads, lubed helix screw, refreshed disks, etc. >Did anybody ever use their OS? (bundled with some of their 5.25" floppy >drives) MDOS? I've got a copy for my Vectors; boots, but I haven't gotten it to do anything; could be that the diskette doesn't have anything on it of course... Anybody know anything about this OS? Anything special that I need to do to get it to accept commands? One that I know about is DIAG, but that doesn't work either; just "Invalid command"s. m

18 years, 5 months

*updating* 8088's

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: Re: *updating* 8088's > From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:31:39 -0800 (PST) > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Alexis wrote: >> I'd like to see an 80286 to 80486 upgrade card. It would need to somehow >> multiplex the 32-bit bus onto the 16-bit bus, perhaps running the >> multiplexing process at double the CPU clock speed. The SX wasn't 16-bit was >> it? Or am I thinking of the 386SX. If it's 16-bit it wouldn't need >> multiplexing. > >Depending on how you DEFINE "16 bit", the 80386SX is a 16 bit version of >the 32 bit 80386[DX]. It therefore is "relatively" easy to retrofit it to >replace a 80286. The 386SX was 32bit core with 16bit databus (modified BIU). While it was cheaper to build systems around and smaller too the performance cost was high compared to the DX. >The 80486SX and 80486DX are the same bit sizes. Their differences involve >whether or not the math FPU is included. > >I ran an 80386 board in a 5150 (8088) machine. There didn't seem to be >much point to it. > I ran a Leading Edge model D (PC XT clone) with an Intel Inboard-386. It gave me 2MB ram and a 16mhz CPU (beats 4.77!) and a bottleneck of the 8bit ISA. However it ran winders3.1 and was a whole lot faster than the 4.77mhz V20. At the time it was far cheaper than a real 386 and much better than the 8088. Allison

18 years, 5 months

IBM PC boards offered

by wpileggi＠juno.com

Anyone interested in the following boards? If so, please email ME and make arrangements for shipping or pickup. Bill/KA3AIS Hard Card - hard disk mounted on 8 bit ISA card with controller. BSM Karddisk 20 (presumably 20 Mb.). AST RAMpage AT=Pak. "Turns your 2MB expanded memory board into a full featured multifunction product". Looks like daughter-card with manual in generic AST box. INTEL Aboveboard/PC boxed. 256kb. >> 2Mb. CGA card with composite connector RCA phono jack. 8 bit ISA. Columbia Data products. Everex Color/Monochrome card. Dual 9 pin connectors + composite RCA phono connector - switch selected. 8 bit ISA. Compaq PLUS Luggable computer...Built-in 9 inch monitor, 5.25 inch floppy, HDD. Very Dirty. _____________________________________________________________ Click now for low cost, approved defensive driving courses! http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2111/fc/Ioyw6iieYCwbKw0PVYD4ROXPC8VNfhT…

18 years, 5 months

"intelligent" disk drives

by dm561＠torfree.net

---------Original Message: Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:21:22 -0800 (PST) From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> Subject: Re: "intelligent" disk drives > >As an aside, IMHO one of the worst mistakes commodore made was that the > >8050 could not at least read the disks of the earlier drives. On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, M H Stein wrote: > Sort of unavoidable because to get the 500MB/side they went to 100TPI drives. Well, 96tpi drives would give pretty much the same capacity as 100tpi ones, with only "half" as many incompatabilities. 'course, if they HAD gotten 500MB/side (v 400-500KB), then it would have been well worth it. -- Fred Cisin cisin at xenosoft.com ---------Reply: Someone actually reads my drivel? Another dent in my forehead ;-) My fingers are typing 500K and the brain, such as it is, is thinking 1/2MB... Yeah, tell me about 100TPI; a couple of us with Vector Graphics are cursing the day Micropolis came up with those; to top it off, they used hard sector diskettes (Vector - the 8050 didn't care) so the disks are almost as scarce as the drives... m

18 years, 5 months

Micropolis (was: "intelligent" disk drives

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: Micropolis (was: "intelligent" disk drives > From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com> > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:58:13 -0800 (PST) > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >Micropolis made excellent floppy drives. It is too bad that their hard >drives sucked. > > >Did anybody ever use their OS? (bundled with some of their 5.25" floppy >drives) > It was called MDOS. Never got a chance to. Allison

18 years, 5 months

"intelligent" disk drives

by tshoppa＠wmata.com

Chuck wrote: >Micropolis floppy drives were very well-made. I wish that modern >drives could be as well-built. All of mine are still operational. I think that like CDC/Imprimis, Seagate, Shugart, etc., Micropolis built drives to different price points for different markets. The ones built for the mini and mainframe market in the late 80's/very early 90's are true tanks and stand up very solidly here 15 or 20 years later. But by the mid-late-90's when capacity was the craze I think that some industrial-duty Micropolis drives were a little too bleeding edge. The MFM ones built for PC-clones, however, seem to simply be "above average", which is pretty good but not stellar. Tim.

18 years, 5 months

what the heck is it

by rescue＠hawkmountain.net

I 'rescued' a unique piece of computer equipment... Here is the data: Raytheon RDS-201E (on badge on front/top) P/N G246101-3010 (from badge on rear) Model VT302 (from badge on rear) This has 2 5.25" full height floppy drives (like the original IBM PC) likely Tandon mechs ? Has a 'built in' (more like 'built on') screen. Has switches for 10 pitch/12 pitch 1/1.5/2 spacing and another I forget (they are on the monitor piece). I don't have a floppy. Ports on the back look like possibly a printer port and the other likes similar like a short printer end centronics interface. So... internet searches have turned up nada.... So.... what the heck is it ? Is it a computer ? Is it some sort of terminal ? I have no media for it... so if it is a computer, I'm doubtful I'll turn up anything for it. Same goes for the keyboard. It is a unique looking enclosure though... very very retro Help me identify what this is, and what I should do with it (if a computer and I can get media, will probably at least play with it, then if no interest find a new owner for it... if some sort of wacked out terminal... if there is no interest, I'm going to yank the drives and anything else useful and scrap it, or if feasable... maybe use it as a 'case mod' for a PC (I usually loath this... but got to admit, this would make a highly unique PC :-) ). -- Curt

18 years, 5 months

Apple Lisa Handbook

by sellam＠vintagetech.com

This cat Michael Posner compiled a book called, "The Apple Lisa Handbook". He's an attorney by day and a geek by night. The introduction is amusing: "In the beginning there was this: 'c:\', and it was hard. But there was an answer, and it came from.....Xerox, yes Xerox. And one day Steve Jobs came to Xerox and said, 'This is great'. So Steve went back to Apple and said, let there be Lisa (allegedly his young daughter out of wedlock). And Apple labored for three years and then (without Steve, who was now raising a pirate flag over at the Macintosh Group) there was Lisa. And Lisa was cool, like no other computer ever made, before or since. But Apple lost heart and Lisa was discontinued. This hurt many people (especially those with vision and a wallet $10,000 lighter). But Lisa lives for those dedicated users. This book is dedicated to them." It's a compilation of articles and announcements from various sources including notes from Apple and magazine reviews. It has a History of Lisa section in chapter one, and includes repair and maintenance tips (towards the middle). It also has an interesting note about Lisa 1 upgrades to the Lisa 2, info I've never seen before: "Upgrades from Lisa 1.0 *To Lisa 2/5, free until June 1, 1984, $595 thereafter *To Lisa 2/10, $2495 until June 1, 1984, $2795 thereafter" The Lisa was announced in January of 1983, so this gives us a small datapoint as to when the upgrades occured (or didn't). Here's an interesting bit: "Sun Remarketing specializes in selling discontinued Apple hardware. It is the only major provider of systems and support for the installed base of 77,000 Lisas." So there were 77,000 Lisas out in the wild according to this. If correct then it was not a very rare machine by any stretch of the imagination (I literally got like 8 in one haul one time, which was distributed between several people) but they are certainly less common these days, now that all the collector's have bought them up. I wonder how many Lisa 1's sold? And then how many were upgraded to Lisa 2's? I wonder if that data still exists at Apple? I like the sell Apple in the product discontinuation letter on page 3. One section has some comments from a CompuServe forum. This one is interesting: "Sb: #121368-#Apple Drops Lisa? 05-Nov-84 18:21:55 I got my INFOWORLD last week and indeed there was a random rumor (not Dvorak) indicating that they heard from a reliable source inside Apple that Apple will drop the Lisa line in '85. Since I got my Lisa in August this year I've been very happy, but now I'm worried. I bought an IMSAI a few months before they dropped their S-100 machine, and she's still working. But it is annoying! Any info would be greatly appreciated." Ah, the good old days, when a juxtaposition between an Apple Lisa and an IMSAI 8080 was normal. Here's a really interesting tidbit: "Infocorp's Gilman estimates that the easy to use computer that inspired Lisa's development--the two year old Xerox 'Star'--has had total sales of only 2,400 units so far. But the Star has only some of Lisa's features and initially costs customers $50,000, or five times as much as Lisa, he points out. Nevertheless, 'because Apple is changing its product and its customer base with Lisa, I would expect it to get of to a slow start,' predicts E. David Crockett, a computer industry analyst at Dataquest, Inc." Wow, I didn't know the Xerox 8010 cost $50K when new. 2,400 units sold by 1983. I would say there are not that many 8010's out there based on this. They are more scarce than I thought. Read Larry Tesler's post-mortem on page 51. Really net. Anyway, an interesting read. Worth spending a few minutes going through it. BTW, check out the author's other interests: http://www.mjposner.com/ He seems to be a pretty interesting guy. -- Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org [ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ] [ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]

18 years, 5 months

Remembering the IBM PC | The Register

by woyciesjes＠sbcglobal.net

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/17/tob_ibm_personal_computer/

18 years, 5 months

VAXmate for Windows

by ajp166＠bellatlantic.net

> >Subject: Re: VAXmate for Windows > From: "Zane H. Healy" <healyzh at aracnet.com> > Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:54:12 -0800 > To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org> > >At 9:23 PM -0800 11/18/07, David Griffith wrote: >>I have seven 5.25" floppies labeled as RX33K which contain: >> >>VAXmate MS-Windows v1.03 (two disks) >>VAXmate Info System v1.1 >>VT240 Emulator Update >>VAXmate S/A Install v1.1 >>VAXmate MS-DOS v3.10 >> >>All of these are labeled "For VAXmate operating environment v1.1". >> >>I don't remember where it came from, but there's been some recent talk >>about VAXen. Who wants these? > >I assume these will only run on a VAXmate? I've only seen one >VAXmate and that was nearly 10 years ago. How good was the VT240 >emulation? VAXmate was a 286 clone, I forget if it was 100% pc or off by a little >from the PC AT. VT240 em was decent, I forget if there were any differnces. Allison > >Zane > > >-- >| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator | >| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary) | OpenVMS Enthusiast | >| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet) | Classic Computer Collector | >+----------------------------------+----------------------------+ >| Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing, | >| PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum. | >| http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/ |

18 years, 5 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

test-drb