Please respond privately if you don't think a 20-year old topic is
appropriate for the list.
I was wondering if anyone's tried to use a Microsolutions Match Point
and/or a Central Point Deluxe option board on a 386/20. I'll be
using an old Micronics system (no custom VLSI) if that's any help.
I'd like to find out if this works before I get out my screwdriver.
Thanks,
Chuck
Hi list,
I'd like to pick your collective brains, if I may?
I have quite a few books here which, though I'd like to keep the
content, do take up a lot of space*. I'm looking at some kind of
solution for scanning them, and so far "cutting the spines off and
loading the pages into a sheet-fed scanner" seems likely to be fastest
- I can't afford an automatic book scanner, and whilst there are units
like the Mustek OpticBook range, it'd take forever to be there picking
the book up, turning the page and replacing it for each scan.
This is only semi-OT inasmuch as I know various people on the list
need to scan classic-computer-related documentation from time to time,
so this info may be useful to others.
So - does anyone know of a make/model scanner which has a high
(ideally 100 pages or more) sheet-feed capacity, is fast (ideally
SCSI, maybe USB2, Firewire is third choice) and produces good results
for this sort of thing? New or secondhand is fine.
Thanks,
Ed.
* nothing of any historic or cultural significance - mainly just
recipe books. I wouldn't destroy anything rare or important.
> So - does anyone know of a make/model scanner which has a high
> (ideally 100 pages or more) sheet-feed capacity, is fast (ideally
> SCSI, maybe USB2, Firewire is third choice) and produces good results
> for this sort of thing?
There are many. I'm currently using a Kodak 2500D, which can be found used
for a few hundred dollars on eBay.
Hi,
Looking for switch setting info for the serial (multi interface?) board
in a Facit 4070 tape punch. The stencilled on labels are a little
cryptic, and there's no stencil for the big chrome toggle switch on the
back.
Thanks,
De
VCF Midwest is happening on April 26-27 at Purdue University in Indiana.
Patrick has told me he's going to literally break the legs of any people
who are able to come but don't. I've seen Patrick do this and it was not
pretty. Please don't piss off Patrick. Start making your plans to attend
NOW.
http://www.vintage.org/2008/midwest/
Both VCF-MW and VCF Europa are occurring on the same weekend. We are
hoping to have some sort of simulcast between the two to the extent
possible in overcoming technical challenges and time zone differences.
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: [FG] [Fwd: viz, Arthur Clarke]
Date: Friday 21 March 2008 11:03
From: Gus Gere <gere at sasktel.net>
To: "fidoguns at fidoguns.org" <fidoguns at fidoguns.org>
Crosspost
<http://www.joyoftech.com/joyoftech/joyimages/1085.jpg>
or via http://tinyurl.com/2hlgpu
-------------------------------------------------------
--
Member of the toughest, meanest, deadliest, most unrelenting -- and
ablest -- form of life in this section of space, ?a critter that can
be killed but can't be tamed. ?--Robert A. Heinlein, "The Puppet Masters"
-
Information is more dangerous than cannon to a society ruled by lies. --James
M Dakin
> I would commit an unnatural act to get a set of CTOS system disks.
It appears Bear Striklin (typewritten.org) has B2x software, though I've not been able to
contact him about it.
Fred Cisin wrote:
> I think you'd have trouble copyrighting a copy of a copyrighted work.
It depends. Certainly when Andy Warhol makes a mechanically-
assisted reproduction of a Campbell's Soup Can, or 32 of them,
he's making original art... just based on a trademarked logo.
I know, trademarks are not the same as copyrights. But other artists
do montages of newspaper clippings to great effect, and there the originals
were protected by copyright.
Or look at Blue Man Group's "Project 13". They didn't own the copyrights
to the original documents, yet they make a perfectly good statement using
them.
At the same time I'm sure BMG pays for the clips of Devo and Freebird
they use to great effect in their shows :-)
His status as a former commercial artist of course has a lot to do with his
other art. I bumped up against that specialty several times over my career
and have a lot of respect for what they do.
I also like Roy Lichtenstein, BTW :-). Others here probably don't like this
kind pop-art stuff. But my experience with commercial artists has really
made me appreciate mechanical processes as well as the results.
Tim.
>>> It is sad that he has passed on. He was a brilliant, visionary man
>>> that, luckily for us, left a legacy of great writings that will
>>> live on.
>> True. But if I remember authors right, 2001 never did come true.
But geostationary communications satellites did.
> Nor did 1984 - however, meanwhile, I hear people call Orwell an
> optimist.
>
> Anyway, the old SF visionaries are leaving us. Asimov, Lem, now
> Clarke;
> the golden times of SF disappear.
>
> Concerning 2001: I doubt I really want to have a HAL9000.
Nothing wrong with the hardware, it had been programmed to be a
serial murderer under certain conditions. Deliberate, not even a bug
and of course contrary to the laws of robotics. Somewhat like HAL,
sadly my father has dementia and likes reciting nursery rhymes (and
gets them wrong), which gets under the skin of the other residents of
his nursing home and he had a fight with an old lady who broke his
glasses and he hit her with his walking stick. The staff took the
stick away and later we got a call to say he had had a fall, hardly
surprising.
Gone slightly off topic there a bit, sorry.
Does anyone here have a use for a BROKEN wide format Hewlett Packard
ink jet printer? I think we got it in 2000, so not ten years old
quite yet but useful for printing schematics if you have the
knowledge/patience to repair it. It might even be a current model,
things move slowly in the wide format side of things where low
volumes force design costs to be recouped over longer periods.
Hi folks,
I want to get a Plessey PMDD/8b get to work on a PDP-8/e. It is not my
system and I currently don't have access to it.
So I would be very lucky to get every piece of information about the
drive. I think it has a cartdridge. That's where my knowledge ends.
And I know that there's no documentation with the machine. So I need the
luck that somebody can help me out.
Is that drive RK05 compatible and works with RK8-E?
Could I hook a RK05 from a 11/23 to an RK8-E controller? Or are there
differences?
Would be great to be prepared when I arrive at the machine...
Many thanks,
best wishes,
Philipp :-)
Forwarding (after confirming with originator) an offer for two
MD2 system located in BC.
If interested, email me off-list and I will forward to you the
email of the originator.
Dave
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Subject: Morrow MD2
Date sent: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:21:34 -0700
I have two Morrow MD2 CP/M computers which I would like to get rid of. One,
when last checked a couple of years ago, was still working and complete with
original software, books, and Lear Siegler terminal. The other was a spare
and although it used to work I borrowed a disk drive from it. And I'm not
sure about the books and software for this one.
I see you already have one of these, but if you are interested please let me
know. I'm in BC.
------- End of forwarded message -------
--
dave06a (at) Dave Dunfield
dunfield (dot) Firmware development services & tools: www.dunfield.com
com Collector of vintage computing equipment:
http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/index.html
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
Subject: Re: S100 archive?
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, M H Stein wrote:
>> I wouldn't call a scan or photocopy of a manual "intellectual property."
>I'd be interested in hearing more of your definition of "intellectual
>property". It seems to be different from that used by the USA legal
>system, in which a copyrighted manual IS an embodiment of intellectual
>property, as is any reproduction, particularly scan or photocopy.
------
My point exactly; a manual, and especially a scan or copy are the
embodiment, not the IP itself; I think you'd have trouble copyrighting
a copy of a copyrighted work.
We were talking about "attribution;" if I were to quote one of Mark Twain's
many witticisms it would still be attributed to him, not me.
So "attribution" of a copy to one of several other copies of the same thing
seems rather meaningless except as a matter of courtesy and I don't
understand why some people seem to think it's useful and important
information.
But, having said that, you're absolutely right: the purpose of the Internet
these days is indeed largely "the free sharing and exchange of other
people's intellectual property," and a large part of that IP is specifically
meant to be shared and exchanged.
m
Hi,
Your posting was from quite a while a go but I thought I'd try dropping
you a line.
I was looking for some information related to the B26 hardware but
there's not too much. I wondered how you got on with your one? I
recently picked one up but I suspect that the floppy/HD card and perhaps
the HD to be faulty so I can get to the 'L' prompt where it stops. The
'L' is where is checks for a floppy drive.
I have changed what I can eg cables, floppy drive, cleaned it out etc
but it does not want to go further.
I picked it up with a pile of manuals, software and system disks.
Did you ever get yours going? Any idea where I could source spares? If
all else fails do you know someone who has an interest in the B26 and
BTOS or CTOS?
Michael Elrick.
Ok, I decided to dive into the PDP-11/05 a bit tonight. First I'm
trying to make sure I have all the right boards for when the time
comes to assemble the system. I have the two CPU boards (M7260 and
M7261, actually three of the latter!), the M9970A SCL connector
board, and two M930 terminators...so now I need some memory.
The stamped silver tag on the side of the chassis says "11/05 SC"
which I assume means it's got an 11/05S backplane in it. This
assumption is supported by the board location sticker inside the card
cage, which is labeled for a 16K core subsystem (H217, G114, G235,
M8293).
The problem is, I don't have that core subsystem...I have enough
boards (in multiple copies) to put together an 8K subsystem, using
H214 (or H215?), G213, and G110 boards. My question is, will this
subsystem function in this backplane, or is the 11/05S backplane only
compatible with the higher-density core subsystem?
There's one other problem...The circuit breaker on the rear of the
chassis is physically damaged. Does anyone have a spare one kicking
around, or know of a currently-available replacement that I can order
>from a component distributor?
Thanks,
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
>The DECmate II (VT100 housing) has the ability to download code into
>the PDP-8 through the terminal port via a special control sequence. I
>haven't tried it on mine yet.
>
Do you know what the control sequence and data format is and/or what
manual documents it?
I though the sequence went VT78 (in VT52), DECmate/VT278 (in VT100),
DECmate II (in big PC like case), DECmate III (in little PC like case),
DECmate III+ (same)
I agree to some extent with Rick. Nevertheless I think no matter what came
to past or didn't the masses have come to accept, sometimes reluctantly, the
technocracy we live in today. Even those in the developing world are being
engaged in the communications and technical revolution. A. C. Clarke showed
us that we need not fear the unknown.
Murray McCullough
Message: 28
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:12:55 -0600
From: woodelf <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca> <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
Subject: Re: Aurthur C. Clarke has passed
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
<cctalk at classiccmp.org> <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Message-ID: <47E12D77.5080206 at jetnet.ab.ca> <47E12D77.5080206 at jetnet.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Rick Bensene wrote:
> It is sad that he has passed on. He was a brilliant, visionary man
> that, luckily for us, left a legacy of great writings that will live on.
True. But if I remember authors right, 2001 never did come true.
> Rick Bensene
>
>
> .
I have a working Data I/O 29B with a 128K RAM module which only had
half of the DRAM sockets populated. From looking at the schematic, it
seemed that by simply populating the remaining DRAM sockets that I
would bring the module up to the full 128K. I tried that, but the 29B
still only reports 64K of RAM. What did I miss?
-Mardy
Hi cctech'ers,
I have an SGI 14" monitor here which needs a new home. Yes, it really is a
13W3 monitor this small. Type number is Wyse WY-851, and it has the "old
style" SGI logo plus the "Silicon Graphics" wording on the front.
I can ship this anywhere in the UK (except highlands, islands and NI) for 8
GBP, you pay PayPal fees. I'll ship internationally if anyone is desperate
for it, but it's likely to cost you more than $100US, so you'd have to be
pretty keen.
If it's not gone fairly soon it'll end up going to the recycler.
Please drop me a mail if you'd like it.
Ed.
Thanks for all the interesting anectodes and tips in answer to my question.
As i am restoring an Imsai, before asking my local car paint shop to repaint the cover, i was hoping to get the exact color reference from someone of our group.
Just for the sake of exactitude of the restoration.
It would be marvelous if Sellam Ismail would give us beside the address of his friend the reference of the paint he used, or was it a "decorative" paint far away from the IMSAI blue?
Living in Switzerland sending the cover to California would be a rather expensive exercice!
Incidentally yes i tend to agree that the original paint was powder coated (at least on on my cover).
Kindest regards
Charles
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Cisin <cisin at xenosoft.com>
Subject: Re: S100 archive?
>On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Alexandre Souza wrote:
<snip>
>> Hey people, why do you do the work? For personal promotion or to help
>> people like you who needed this info sometime and didn't found it?
>"The purpose of the internet is for the free sharing and exchange of other
>people's intellectual property." ?
<snip>
I wouldn't call a scan or photocopy of a manual "intellectual property."
How about:
"One of the goals of the Classic Computer community is the preservation
and free sharing and exchange of documentation and media related to
obsolete computer systems, with the assumed or explicit permission of
the original owner of the intellectual property."
m
Dunno if this will be considered on-topic or not, as it's not about real
hardware - if not, my humble apologies.
Last night I released a Z80 emulator written in perl to the CPAN. You
can download it from:
http://search.cpan.org/~dcantrell/CPU-Emulator-Z80-0.9/
and the source is in CVS on sourceforget:
http://drhyde.cvs.sourceforge.net/drhyde/perlmodules/CPU-Emulator-Z80/
It emulates almost all of the "undocumented" instructions, I/O, and
interrupt mode 1. I am very grateful to the author of FUSE for
licencing it in such a way that I could use his comprehensive suite of
tests.
Now I have to write an assembler, and have the fun of writing an
operating system :-)
--
David Cantrell | A machine for turning tea into grumpiness
On the bright side, if sendmail is tied up routing spam and pointless
uknot posts, it's not waving its arse around saying "root me!"
-- Peter Corlett, in uknot