Against better judgement, I attempted to low-level format a Plus
Hardcard 20 and completely borked it (with the wrong format, the
controller won't init and the thing is now a brick). Does anyone have
the Plus Hardcard 20 install diskette?
The HardCard is shipped in a partitioned and formatted state, with a
number of files included on it. The directory of files is as follows:
INSTALL EXE 47479 1-01-80 12:06a
HCD BAT 30 1-01-80 12:07a
HCD1 BAT 128 1-01-80 12:07a
HCD2 EXE 54769 1-01-80 12:07a
HCD3 DAT 13440 1-01-80 12:07a
HCD3 DIF 704 1-01-80 12:07a
HCD6 SCR 4224 1-01-80 12:07a
PREPARE BAT 235 1-01-80 12:08a
SHELL BAT 18 1-01-80 12:07a
LIGHT COM 145 1-01-80 12:07a
SOUND COM 145 1-01-80 12:07a
PATCHFMT EXE 12670 1-01-80 12:08a
INSTALL DAT 425 1-01-80 12:06a
The original Plus install program creates a floppy diskette containing
the Plus files, as above, but also performs several other operations to
make it what they refer to as the "REINSTALL" diskette. This Reinstall
diskette can later be used for reformatting the HardCard.
Anyone have this?? I am killing myself for bricking the card and would
really love to get it back.
--
Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
Help our electronic games project: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.wordpress.com/
Eric J Korpela wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:16 AM, Al Hartman <alhartman at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Why not try adding a PCI IDE adapter? It will have it's own BIOS that will
>> over-ride the internal BIOS.
>
>With an Award 486 BIOS v1.01, this machine doesn't have PCI slots. In
>fact I doubt that it would even have VESA Local Bus (VLB) slots. I
>would make a wild assed guess that this is a reworked 386 motherboard
>with 7 ISA slots, 3 of which are 16bit and one of which has a
>proprietary 32bit ISA extension for use as memory expansion.
>
>How close did I come, Kurt?
>
>Eric
>
>
I don't know exactly. This machine was bought used and I am only just
starting to learn things about it. I wish I could be of more help.
Fred Cisin wrote:
>
>Does the Packard Bell hardware support cable select?
>
I honestly don't know. I had thought they all did.
>> Can someone suggest a good book that goes into this type of thing?
>
>Scott Mueller's Repairing and Upgrading PCs
>prob'ly 3 or 4 editions before the current one. Try maybe ed 12 or 13
>
>
>
I will look for a copy of it. Thanks.
Michael Lee wrote:
>
>As for books, just an old copy of Upgrading and Repairing PCs is a great
>reference in my opinion.
>
>
Thanks, Michael. I'll look for a copy of it.
Chuck Guzis wrote:
>
>Given that this is a 486, I don't think that the BIOS is your
>problem. I've used OPTI chipset 486s with two drives with no
>problem.
>
>What kind of IDE cable are you using to hook up the second drive? If
>it's an 80-conductor (UDMA) cable, then it's likely that the old IDE
>controller can't see the drive. You need the 40-conductor cable.
>You may also have to jumper the drive to restrict it to 8GB or less
>(some drives can do this).
>
>FWIW,
>Chuck
>
>
The cable is a 40-pin ribbon cable (the old kind).
Hi!
I am continuing work on the N8VEM project. So far the SBC phase appears to
be a success. There are many successful builders.
The next phase has started. I just received an order of ECB backplane PCBs.
I am assembling my own ECB backplane using standard off-the-shelf-parts.
The ECB backplane can be used with the N8VEM SBC for IO expansion. It is
intended for the "heavy" IO devices like Disk controllers and video boards.
I am presently working on an ECB bus monitor to assist in the development of
builder developed ECB peripherals.
However, the ECB bus monitor will probably not be available for several
weeks.
After the ECB bus monitor project, I will continue on with the N8VEM Disk IO
peripheral. It will have an IDE and NEC765 based FDC.
All hardware and software information is freely available and I will help
you the best I can to build your system.
Obviously, most builders are highly skilled individuals who choose to highly
customize their systems and don't need any of my help.
Builders are encouraged to share their experiences on the N8VEM forums to
help others. This has been quite successful in identifying and resolving
various bugs.
If you are interested in either the N8VEM SBC or ECB backplane PCBs to build
your own home brew Z80 CP/M computer, please contact me offline.
The SBC and the ECB backplane PCBs are available for low cost ($20 each plus
shipping).
Thank you in advance. Have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
PS, you can get additional information here:
http://groups.google.com/group/n8vem
You can find a Terak emulator here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bk-terak-emu/
Schematics of the boards would be nice to find.
I have pics of the boards on bitsavers.
If it ends up you're missing boards, I have a CPU, but
no monitor or keyboard, and at this point it seems about
as likely to finding a kb/monitor for my PERQ.
Geez, that hurts. They're 'investment grade'
systems now. Major bummer.
I saw a couple, some years ago, rusting away in a
scrapyard in the midwest. They used to belong to
Boeing. Damaged beyond all repair.
Lots of heartache to go around . . . .
-- Steven Hirsch <snhirsch at gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's listed for $199 plus shipping for the main unit
<sigh> I picked up three or four units with disk drives about 12 years
ago at University of Vermont's surplus sale. Had no idea what they were
and could not find anyone who did. Ended up parting them out and keeping
the drive mechanisms.
Blast.
Steve
--
____________________________________________________________
Click to make millions by owning your own franchise.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3m6iRzCLyaA7qgoeQCz0rN6r7…
Does anybody have a PC board cad layout of the DEC card edge connector?
I was hoping to find it in PCB (http://pcb.sourceforge.net/index.html)
format.
I would like to have some boards fabricated that were just fingers and
connection pads. I will attach the fingers to some Vector boards and do
point-to-point wiring. I have some project ideas for OMNIBUS and QBus,
but DEC protoboards are rare and/or expensive.
I have little experience with layout work and so far have been
frustrated by my attempts.
-chuck
Hi Dave,
> I'd love to see something like this happen. Are the Lilith's
> internals documented well enough to allow for something like this?
They weren't until Jos Dreesen provided the ftp address:
ftp://jdreesen.dyndns.org/ftp/lilith
What there was effectively user documentation / research papers on
the Lilith hardware / software and the Medos operating system and
a PC version of the Lilith modula-2 compiler (with an MCode interpreter)
in both source and object form.
But now we have systems disks, source code, microcode and schematics.
So we can emulate lilith at a variety of levels from, say, a simple
Linux/X11 software version to a low-level TTL reproduction (thought you'd
have to source AMD29xx bit-slice processor parts). Importantly for me
the new information contains it's bitmap formats so my MCode interpreter
in 'C' can support the missing graphics opcodes.
Lilith is really an impressive European graphics workstation, which
although not as revolutionary as the Alto was certainly radical for the
time even though it predated the Macintosh by only 2 or 3 years.
Amongst its many interesting facets:
* The display was geared to PAL video standards, hence the 768x594, 50Hz
interlaced format (of course this means it can be emulated on any SVGA or higher-resolution display).
* MCode is well suited to microcode and cpu emulation making it easily
ported to the pdp-11, and 8086.
* They used a kind of 8086 segmentation scheme to get around 64kW limits.
* It could run Modula-2 about 3x faster than an Alto could run Mesa.
* It was a true programmer's machine running Modula-2 from the
ground up. In that sense it was an experiment in using the latest GUI
ideas for systems development (wheras Alto was primarily an experiment in
easy-to-use personal computing for non-technical people).
In the end it's the use of MCode which should allow a firmware-level emulation to run original systems disks on a simple Microcontroller and that kinda interests me: A lilith for only a few ?/?/$ :-)
So, one day I'll have my own Lilith, and it will fit in my pocket ;-)
-cheers from Julz @P
---------Original Message(s):
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:24:55 -0700
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
Subject: Re: Upgrading early BIOS
On 14 Aug 2008 at 10:55, M H Stein wrote:
> Well, I never knew that just replacing the cable in my 386 and 486 systems
> would speed things up; live and learn. I always thought that if the mobo
> wasn't pin 34 aware and UDMA capable then the cable wouldn't have much
> effect on the transfer mode. AFAIK in order to use UDMA all three items
> have to be UDMA capable, the mobo, the cable and the drives, although
> I'd say that, assuming it's UDMA aware, the mobo controls the speed
> depending on what kind of cable and drives it sees. Semantics?
Partly, I suppose. I can speak only from (a pile of) experience.
Using a UDMA cable can create some real problems with older systems.
And some early supposedly-UDMA-capable systems can't handle the full
transfer rate of UDMA-133.
IDE's pretty much been a mess from Day One. For example, I've got an
early IDE drive that flips the endian-sense on the word pair returned
for the total number of sectors on the drive. It was not uncommon
for drives from two different manufacturers not to work as master-
slave on the same cable.
At any rate, for the OP my advice stands. Use a 40-conductor cable
and forget about cable select--jumper for master and slave. And
cross your fingers and offer up a chicken or two to whatever deity is
in charge of IDE operation.
Cheers,
Chuck
----------Reply:
Ah, now those 3 paragraphs I agree with 100% (although I'm not sure that
IDE deities care for chicken); anything else was surely just semantics ;-)
m
Hi,
I am writing a little 68000 ASM code so I can add a few of my own commands to AMOS Basic. Whilst searching online I found this great page:
http://www.virtualdub.org/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=84
It mentions a "green-covered" issue of Byte with programming tips for the 68000 (eg. moveq #0 is faster than clr.l 0!). Does anyone have this issue and can I have a copy of it? Or at the very least, the issue number so I can hunt it down, please?
Regards,
Andrew B
aliensrcooluk at yahoo.co.uk
Hi,
I found a program, which converts a .brd file into Protel format. I
can import Protel format into my Altium designer system.
If you still interested, please send me your files. Thanks.
By the way, I used EAGLE more than 20 years ago, but it doesnt meet
any of the design creterias of commercial PCB development, so I drop
it. Maybe the system is better now, but I can tell you, I dont need a
day or a week to create a component, I just need 10 minutes to create
components with 20 to 40 Pins, including different packages (Through
hole and SMD). And I am not a?professional PCB designer, I only do two
or three simple projects a year.
Cheers
Gerhard
Something over a year ago you posted that you had a backup copy of the
software for the Intronics Pocket Programmer. Is this perchance the original
parallel printer port version? Due to a calamity of stupid human tricks when
the Company I work for sold off one of its product lines the software for
the programmer (which we still have) went with the sale and I suddenly have
a need to burn some 2764 EPROMS to upgrade the firmware in a old system but
I can't get approval for a new burner "because we'll never need it again"
(famous last words) so if you still have the software I'd be interested.
TIA,
Bob Fay
Bob Fay
Mutualink
Mail: rf.technologies at gmail.com
----------Original Message(s):
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:49:02 -0700
From: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
Subject: Re: Upgrading early BIOS
On 13 Aug 2008 at 9:12, Eric J Korpela wrote:
> The concept of "cable select" hadn't been invented when this machine
> was built. Use master/slave.
Is not the operation of "cable select" a function of the cable and
not the mobo? If the OP is using a "cable select" IDE cable, he can
use CS with no problem.
That business with him mentioning CS is what made me wonder if he
wasn't also using a UDMA cable (which by the standard also supports
CS). (It's starting to get pretty hard to find *new* non-UDMA cables
nowadays). If that's the case, then any UDMA-capable drives will be
operating in that mode, which will not work with his old system. If
he's using non-UDMA drives, then the cable won't matter.
Cheers,
Chuck
---------------Reply:
AFAIK cable select has always been an option with Parallel ATA drives,
although it was rarely used in pre-UDMA days; the cable was obviously
different (40 conductors with standard connectors vs. 80 conductors and
unique special connectors) and the order of the drives was usually reversed
(i.e. the slave on the end of the cable).
It's the motherboard that determines the cable type and mode from pin 34,
which is grounded at the mobo end in a UDMA cable, so if the mobo isn't
UDMA-aware I don't think the drives would be, and the cable wouldn't matter.
Also, not all drives supported CS.
Bottom line: don't use CS with pre-UDMA drives, cables and/or motherboards
unless you're certain that all three support it, and even master/slave can be
problematic with very old IDE drives.
More info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_Drive_Electronics
m
------------------------------
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:02:51 +0100 (BST)
> From: ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk (Tony Duell)
> Subject: Re: IBM EGA Programming manual: anyone have a copy?
> To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> Message-ID: <m1KSnuA-000J1gC at p850ug1>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
>
>> I'm searching for a copy of the official IBM EGA programming
>> manual/reference manual.
>> If I recall correctly, in order to actually GET that manual you needed
>> to have bought the $150? CGA/MDA programming/reference manual (or
>> something like that) and have sent in the little registration card, and
>> IBM sent you the EGA one in the mail.
>> Does anyone have a copy of it?
>>
>
> I assuem this is not the EGA section from the O&A Techref. I have that,
> it inculdes the BIOS ROM source listing, schematics, and details of all
> the I/O ports used, but no explict programing info with examples.
>
>
>> (a copy of the cga/mda one would be nice too, but isn't nearly as important)
>> Contact me off-list (or on-list if you'd like) if you do, I'm quite
>>
>
> Again, I have the apporopriate TechRef sections...
>
> -tony
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
Yes, it was that. Barry Watzman sent me a scan of his photocopied copy
of it.
--
Jonathan Gevaryahu
jgevaryahu(@t)hotmail(d0t)com
jzg22(@t)drexel(d0t)edu
More stuff I'd forgotten I had. I was starting to build an
8080-based S-100 computer in the late 1970's, but lost interest
when I bought an Apple IIe system for "only" $2000 (in 1982
dollars!)
Anyway, there is:
1) Wameco CPU-1, mostly populated including the 8080A. Looks like
the 8224 and 8228 are not there, though.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=1zef37s&s=4
2) Ithaca Audio 8K 2102 board, fully socketed and populated.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=29lefr8&s=4
3) Piiceon 8K Program Saver (2708 EPROM programmer). Complete
except for the TL497CN switching regulator chip. Includes two
2708's.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2r7x7jt&s=4
NOTE: The above three boards were never powered up or tested. No
idea if they will actually work or not!
4) Solid State Music VB-1B Video Interface. This one was actually
working with a different (homebrewed) 8080A board way back in
1979. I think it's 64 characters x 16 lines, monochrome of course.
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2qa6bde&s=4
Please make offer on one or all. Shipping will be from zip 65775
(US).
Somewhere I have a Wameco "Little Mother Board" backplane too, but
haven't gotten that far down into the junkpile yet.
thanks
Charles
Why not try adding a PCI IDE adapter? It will have it's own BIOS that
will over-ride the internal BIOS.
You can even add a PCI SATA adapter for that matter.
Computer Geeks have them pretty cheap.
IF your 486 Board has PCI Slots. I know I have an ISA IDE Adapter from
Future Domain here that I've never used, but I don't know if it's going
to work any better with newer drives.
Al
If anyone on the list is aware of Sigma equipment still in existence,
please
contact me. I am aware that Honeywell forcibly retired the systems as
service
contracts expired in the early 80s, and that this will be very rare if
it does
exist at all.
Thanks,
Rich
Rich Alderson
RichA at vulcan.com
Server Engineer, PDPplanet Project (206)
342-2239
Vulcan, Inc., 505 5th Avenue S, Seattle, WA 98104 (206)
465-2916 cell
----------Original Message:
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:48:09 -0600
From: "B M" <iamvirtual at gmail.com>
Subject: Paper Tape Reader
Does anyone know of a source for a [relatively] cheap paper tape
reader suitable for reading standard DEC paper tapes? I have several
paper tapes from a PDP-11/20 that I would like to read, and of course,
share :-). Something like the OP-80 from Oliver Engineering would be
suitable.
Thanks.
--barrym
----------Reply:
I've got 4 or 5 different models of PPT readers (and some perfs), but
none quite as simple as the OP-80 and they'd all require some custom
interfacing; what's [relatively] cheap ???
Contact me off-list if interested; thanks.
mike
Does anyone here have a collection of Questbusters newsletters? I just
acquired some from my brother who asked me to sell them. I'd like to see
if I can get scans gathered together.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi at cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
About the web page I posted the link for yesterday:
http://www.4004.com/
I emailed the owner of the site to ask a question and got an interesting response:
The right-hand 4004 exhibit photo at the top of the page looks like a 4004 reproduced with surface mount devices on a PC board. Is that what it is? If so, where is it specifically discussed in the text?
Thanks,
Bill
Hi Bill,
Those are indeed surface-mount transistors positioned where the original transistors are on the chip, but the photo is of a non-functional prototype currently on exhibit at the Intel Museum. Alas, we are still working on our ultimate goal of building a fully functional reproduction of the 4004, and displaying that in a museum or two. There is no write-up because this ambitious part of the saga is still in-progress, and because we're all busy professionals with "day jobs," there is currently no estimated completion date.
Since you expressed an interest, here's where we're at: we have a verified netlist from the schematics, and an unverified netlist we painstakingly extracted from the mask artwork. It contains key geometry information we need for layout and routing, but also some errors we need to find and fix. We ran into a snag reconciling the two netlists (it is an "NP hard" problem), but I think we're getting close to a solution. Then we can move to the PC board layout stage, build another giant prototype, and start debugging... I'm crossing my fingers and praying that we can finish the project by this upcoming 37th anniversary of the 4004 product announcement back on November 15 of 1971.
--Tim
> It's listed for $199 plus shipping for the main unit
It's being watched.
Thanks to sniping, and eBay hiding of the bidder name, there
is no incentive to 'tag' anything with a bid any more.